Monthly Archives: September 2015

The Illegal Migrant Invasion of Europe: Just Another Day at the Office for the CBC

Posted on by

The Illegal Migrant Invasion of Europe: Just Another Day at the Office for the CBC

by Tim Murray

Asylum applications for Germany in 2015
CBC: “Carrying capacity? What’s that?”
Estimated asylum applications in Germany in 2015: 800,000 — and no end in sight

August 28, 2015 was just another day at the office for CBC television’s flagship news hour The National.

Since the beginning of the year, viewers have become accustomed to seeing one or two news clips or features each night that are designed to draw attention to the inherent bigotry and racism of whites — the new “blacks”. Every time you sit down to watch The National, you can always count on the CBC to present a story about the evils of Residential Schools or the high rates of violence against native women, or the lack of parity with whites in medical care, or past discrimination against Chinese, Sikhs and blacks, or the barriers that they faced in rising to athletic or military fame, or the plight of “undocumented” immigrants in Canada… the list goes on. The message: we have much to be ashamed of, much to apologize for, and many amends to make. We owe our standing to “White Privilege”, and we must proceed with haste to relinquish it.

Last night viewers saw another installment of this ongoing campaign. This time, however, the issue was the current refugee crisis in Europe. The lead story was about 71 “asylum-seekers” who were jammed in a truck and found dead by a roadside in Austria, the victims of suffocation. Then viewers bore witness to disturbing scenes of corpses washed ashore in Libya, all drowned in a failed attempt to reach Europe. Of course, this footage was provided to give a human face to the statistics that the CBC spewed out in machine gun fashion. Statistics like the number of migrants who had so far drowned in the Mediterranean (2500), the number that had arrived so far this year (340,000), and the staggering number whom Chancellor Angela Merkel and her collaborators will have processed before the year is out (800,000). This will be quadruple the number who came last year.

Stopping the flow of illegal migrants to Europe? Not even an option at the CBC. Instead talk about how Canada should follow the — suicidal — European example. How should Europe cope with this flow? Stopping it was not an option. It was not on the table. This is the CBC we are talking about, after all. No, instead we heard from people like an Austrian official who said that we must “build legal channels” for these people to get here. It is about getting EU member states to “fairly share the burden”. After all, Germany is “a big and prosperous nation”, and there is lot of room in the nations to the north (Scandinavia).

But how many will come? How many more will come when the news gets out that entry into Europe will be safer and easier? The possibility that the queue is never-ending does not factor into the Cultural Marxist equation. But why should we expect otherwise? You might get Cultural Marxist politicians to talk about immigration, but you will never get them to give you a number. Like Samuel Gompers, when asked about what trade unions wanted, they simply answer “more”. Neither Merkel nor Cameron nor Jeb Bush nor Thomas Mulcair nor Justin Trudeau will tell you how many people they ultimately want to live in their respective countries. They will only tell you that we must do “more”. Some might concede that we can’t absorb new waves of migrants indefinitely, but in the meantime, the sky is the limit. Carrying capacity? What’s that?

Ian Hanomansing, the National’s anchor this night, in referring to the fact that the Canadian government relies heavily on private sponsorship to determine refugee intakes, stated that “Canadians must step up to the plate”. But then came the good news. There is a coalition of people in Toronto who are doing just that. People of disparate faiths. One of them was a descendent of Holocaust survivors who felt it here obligation to do for Syrian and Iraqi refugees what Canada did for her relatives. Oh yes, the Holocaust card. Play it and you win the argument every time. That is why the phrase “None is Too Many” is always thrown out whenever a critic introduces a word of caution about opening the floodgates too widely and quickly. “None is Too Many” is the infamous reply that Prime Minister MacKenzie King gave to a question as to how many German Jewish refugees Canada should admit.

To cap this formulaic narrative, viewers were subsequently treated to one of those famous CBC “Panel” discussions, where veteran commentators or experts who are on the same ideological page pretend to offer a genuine debate about the issue. Their opinions typically range from the centre-Left to the far Left. This time, however, there were only two panellists, Janice Stein, Director of the Munk School of Global Affairs, and Saeed Khan, a lecturer in Near East and Asian Studies at Wayne State University — and there was a hint of division.

Khan said that Europe can expect one million, not 800,000, refugees this year, but, not to worry. Since there are 740 million Europeans, one million will be a “small percentage”. Moreover, they will be just popping over for a visit, an overnight stay if you will, as once the dust settles in the Middle East, and Syria and Iraq are sorted out, these asylum-seekers will want to go back. They will “re-migrate”.

Yeah sure they will, Dr. Khan. It seems that Khan was reading from the same script that the late Senator Ted Kennedy read from in 1965 when he assured opponents of his proposed changes to immigration policy that it would not result in a significant change to the ethnic profile of the United States or to the country’s population level.

Stein, to her credit, was not so optimistic. She pointed out that there are 4 million displaced Syrians, and there is no end in sight. Then came a shocking revelation. “Europe does not want nor is it capable of accommodating these numbers”, Stein pointed out. One wonders how the CBC faithful survived this sudden injection of reality.

CBC health warning logo
CBC health warning logo. The broadcasting station is liable for a heavy overdose of anti-European propaganda.

It is clear that the CBC has a mission: Manufactured Consent. Indoctrination by increments. Watching the CBC should come with a health warning.

As any good official State Broadcaster would do, the CBC is softening us up for the coming invasion, whose proportions would boggle our imagination. Think not of a million refugees. Think in terms of tens of millions of refugees. Think even of a billion people on the move in the next decade or two — and that may be a conservative estimate. The consequences will be lethal to our nation, and to those in Europe, America and Australia.

By the time the masses come to their senses, it may be far too late. And you can bet that as more take to the streets or protest outside migrant centres, as more so-called “far right” parties rise in strength, the propaganda campaign waged against them will grow ever more intense. “Anti-immigrant” groups will be vilified with greater vigour, and politicians like Chancellor Merkel will be praised for taking “a real leadership role” in turning a deaf ear to the people. Germany, she has declared, is a nation proud of its diversity, and “has no room for violence or intolerance”, or “those who are not willing to help where help is needed”. But one day most Germans will have no room for Angela Merkel.

We are headed toward an epic storm

The Surrender of Europe September 5, 2015: A Day that will Live in Infamy

Posted on by

The Surrender of Europe September 5, 2015: A Day that will Live in Infamy

The walls have come tumblin’ down. The Germans and Austrians have thrown their borders wide open. Syrian migrants in their tens of thousands are pouring in. Soon there will be almost a million of them, with an endless queue forming behind them. Word will get out to Africans and Asians: “The West is weak. They have given up. Their resistance is broken. Pick up your bags and let’s  join the stream.” Jean Raspail’s nightmare has come to pass.

The Camp of the Saints

[French journalist Jean Raspail’s prophetic novel The Camp of the Saints predicted the Third World “refugee” invasion of Europe, aided by political traitors and a rotten anti-white ruling class.. Available for $25.00 postpaid from C-FAR Books, P.O. Box 332, Rexdale, ON., M9W 5L3, CANADA.]

We will remember this day for the rest of our lives. 

This is the day we lost our civilization. The enemy is within our gates, and more and more will pour in. We are finished. This is the end. Or at the very least, the beginning of the end.  And to think that it took just one image, one photo of a three year old boy lying dead on a Turkish beach, to shatter our resolve and turn the tide. One image was the straw that broke Europe’s back. 

I can’t find any words to describe my feelings at this point.  A composite of impotent rage, despair, fatalism? It is hard to say. 

 What does one say when he bears witness to the unfolding displacement, conquest or extinction of his tribe, and the destruction of a legacy that reaches back to ancient Athens? What do say when you realize that the people in your family who gave their lives to save Europe seven decades ago evidently died in vain? And what of the heroes centuries ago  who beat back the Muslim invaders at Tours and the Battle of Vienna? It seems in retrospect, that their victories were just a holding action. Europe survived the Muslim and Mongol invasions, but it has succumbed to an incursion of an unarmed army of wretched refugees. 

It is as if, before our eyes, European-based culture in North America, Australia and Europe is being torn apart by a pack of wild dogs. One dog is Middle Eastern, one dog is African, one is Central American, another is Chinese and another is South Asian. And many of them are Muslim. 

Some of us are fighting back. Donald Trump. The Prime Minister of Hungary. The President of the Czech Republic. Populist politicians who are vilified by the mainstream media and shut out of power.  But they are the beleaguered few.  Will this be their Last Hurrah?

We could have stopped the flood. But our leaders lacked the will, and too many people were making money selling out their country. There is no conceivable punishment that could be meted out to these despicable traitors that would be commensurate with their crimes. What retribution would be fitting for Angela Merkel? What is the penalty for betraying one’s people and murdering their heritage?     

Tim Murray
September 5, 2015


White Privilege? — One Fed Up White Woman

Posted on by

White Privilege? — One Fed Up White Woman

Attachments area…

See More

This video is about Stop White Genocide

The Truth About the “Refugee” Invasion of Europe

Posted on by

The Truth About the “Refugee” Invasion of Europe

Refugees and migrants wait to board a bus following their arrival onboard the Eleftherios Venizelos passenger ship at the port of Piraeus in Greece

Illegals in Greece — the unarmed invasion of sovereign countries

Published on Sept. 7, 2015

The migrant crisis is being exploited by governments to impose mass immigration on western countries whose voters have overwhelming rejected the failed policy of multiculturalism

Cutting through the “Refugee” Hysteria

Posted on by

Cutting through the “Refugee” Hysteria

During the past week the media has omitted mention of pertinent factors quite deliberately.  Communist China showed off its military to remember the end of the Japanese war effort.   The media left one to assume that these Chinese had defeated Japan.   The USA defeated Japan and Chiang Kai-Shek’s Nationalist Army was the most successful opponent of the Japanese within China.   The communists under Chairman Mao were scarcely more than a rabble.  They had more impact on civilians than Japanese.  Memory of these facts gained little attention.

So it is also with the recent migration issues in Europe.   The contextual factors that matter in shaping pubic opinion have not been outlined by the media although they are well known.   The reason for this deliberate silence, awaiting signs of the politically correct stance to take, informs the following notes.

  1. Who is a refugee and who is an economic migrant?   The acquirement of privileges  depends upon an answer to this question.  Commonsense answers and not media and German usage should apply.   A person becomes a refugee at the very first place at which he or she finds shelter and protection when fleeing from a situation that threatens this person’s life.    Even if his sojourn is brief.     Should this refugee seek to leave this shelter he abandons the status of a refugee.   He moves from the status of a refugee to that of other migrants, perhaps an economic migrant (in the 17C there were religious emigrants from England).   Once safety is first reached a refugee can make a decision that now he is safe there are other options available for future life.   In this he is utterly no different from a migrant escaping a famine or simply trying to achieve a more rewarding existence.  Thus Syrians who choose to leave Lebanon, Turkey or Jordan, where they have refuge, and travel to Europe by so doing acquire the status of economic migrants.   The media and Germany choose to overlooks this critical semantic.   They decide who is a refugee by identifying his place of origin.  They ignore whether he started his journey to Europe from a place of safety outside his place or country of origin.
  2. Let us confront the reality that the Islamic faith of any migrant imposes a burden for any European country.   France has notably failed to assimilate Muslims.   Admitting more Muslim migrants will compound this difficulty.   This is true in Britainand elsewhere.   Eighty per cent of Muslims in the UK have attested in a poll that being a citizen of the UK is subordinate in importance to their religion.  Disloyalty and security issues arise.    Non Muslim migrants avoid this problem.
  3. The UK and the Netherlands like to see themselves as multicultural societies.   With the present ethnic mixture comes considerable integration.   Sadly this will become a passing reality in the UK that is now a host to 8 million people not born in the country.   Globally, since the 1960s academics have recorded situations where people from different backgrounds move towards parity in numbers.   The almost invariable consequence is tension, conflict, and broken heads.   It is now happening in Ulster where the Catholics are outbreeding the Protestants.   Thus in-migration just builds problems of civil cohesion.    The invasion of Europe that is now occurring lowers civic unity and encourages the perseverance of extremist nationalist politics.
  4. Many in-migrants, perhaps most, from Syria have been involved on all sides of the civil war.  Many have been combatants.    They want to avoid documentation until they have disguised their identities.    One day some will be prosecuted for war crimes in Syria because of poor documentation and identity checks due to the excitement over this issue generated by the encouragement of the immigration of undocumented Syrians to Germany.
  1. The politicians who talk about the past movement of people within Europe as a reason why the first wave of the new invasion should be accommodated have got it wrong.   If we’ve done it once why cannot it be done again?

These politicians have overlooked the fact that these shifts in population involved people who derived from mainly Christian backgrounds and accepted the subordination of religion to the affairs of states.   The migrants, in other words, were cousins.   What of the Jews?   They do not proselytize.   They accommodate themselves to their hosts.   Many rapidly drift away from Judaism.    This is quite a contrast to the insular Muslim who tenaciously cling to their belief and ways of ordering their lives.

  1. There has been mention that the interwar exodus from German lands was an undocumented tide.   The USA and Canada rarely admitted immigrants who at the point of entry did not possess valid documents.   These must be issued by Embassies in Europe.   The overwhelming number of the 600,00 inter-war in-migrants to the UK bore documents of entitlement to entry issued by British Embassies in Europe.
  2. Queen  Angela Merkel  2 or 3 weekends ago declared that Germany at the time had 400,000 would be recent migrants.   She declared that Syrians, even without documentation, would be preferred because they were refugees.   Her spokesman let it be known that each Syrian would receive a monthly subsistence allowance of 365 Euros, free housing and medical attention.  Now the number has risen to 800,000.   It will require 10 bn euro a year to look after them.   And think what this will do to unemployment figures.   In such a way the invasion was encouraged and became a German Problem in August 2015.    Now the Germans are frightened and seek to deflect responsibility.  With the aid of France and Brussels they are desperate to declare this is now an European Problem.
  3. The Pope in Rome believes that man is born with a quiver full of rights.   The victors of war in the 1940s shared this belief that has informed the heart of refugee policies ever since.   But recorded history show that rights are man made and situational.   Hence the different degrees, statuses and fortunes of men.   A reality that has been pushed aside since the 1940s.   This limited and provisional view of the rights of man is the only one that I relevant to this present Century.    Authoritarian regimes are many.   By reason of their nature they encourage dissidence.   In turn this creates refugees.  For every democratic regime there is a matching authoritarian government.   Hence the numbers of potential dissidents and refugees might amount to 30 to 40 percent of global population.   It is beyond the resources of the democratic regimes to provide havens for all these possible dissidents.   Just think of the size of possible dissidence in modern China.  The application of the 1940s beliefs and outlook about refugees cannot cope with the sheer scale of authoritarian regimes.  The United Nations and the European Union should close their institutions devoted to 1940s refugee missions.    They are not entitled to judge the varying responses to refugee pressures by democratic nations who interpret the world through the eyes of their elector citizens.
  4. Finally, let us remember 17C England.    In the parishes the fear contained in this nursery rhyme summed up the migration debate.

“Hark Hark the dogs do bark

The beggars are coming to town

Some in rags and some in jags

And one in velvet gown”

(A jag was a slit in a gown.)

In 1601, an Act for the Relief of the Poor was succeeded in 1662 by an Act of Settlement.   Our first national policy for the poor was contained in these Acts.  Each parish became responsible for its own poor. A poor person had to have a  “settlement” in a particular parish in order to be entitled to remain within its boundary.   When a person was unemployed, after 40 days in a parish, he would be chucked out unless he could prove that he was born in the parish.   Then these unemployed beggars would migrate to parishes where they might be treated more leniently.   Beggars banded together and menaced parishes.  Such parishes demanded better protection, improvement in the pooling of responsibility across parishes (how modern!).   This is what the 1662 Act bestowed upon them. – P. Dilaveri

Category: Uncategorized | Tags: ,