Blog Archives

Justin Trudeau is no Friend of Canada

Posted on by

THE CANADIAN RED ENSIGN

The Canadian Red Ensign

THURSDAY, JUNE 14, 2018

Justin Trudeau is no Friend of Canada

 
I, as long time readers will be well aware, am a Canadian and a patriot of my country. Many Canadians seem to think that being a patriotic Canadian means being anti-American but I like to quote one of my two favourite Prime Ministers, (1) John G. Diefenbaker, who said “I am not anti-American, I am very pro-Canadian.” Of course, for a Tory like myself, being a Canadian patriot does involve a firm belief in my country’s own institutions and traditions rather than those of the United States. I believe in parliamentary government, reigned over by a king or queen, rather than republican government presided over by an elected president, and have argued this point at length. I have a very low view of sedition, rebellion, and revolution, which history demonstrates almost always produce a worse and more oppressive government, and so cannot share the common American belief, born out of their founding mythos, that these are the well-spring of liberty. I say rather, with the long-neglected Canadian conservative John Farthing, that “freedom wears a crown” and believe the tradition of loyalty upon which our country was founded and which led us to stand by Britain from the beginning of the Second World War to be a virtuous tradition worthy of honour. I trust that you can see the difference between this attitude and the juvenile, left-wing, anti-Americanism that the Liberals, NDP and Greens seem to think is part and parcel of Canadian patriotism.

I see, therefore, no patriotic reason to come the the defence of Her Majesty’s First Minister in Ottawa simply because he has been on the receiving end of a barrage of insults from the American President and members of his administration. Frankly, he deserved them. While I have no problem with a Canadian Prime Minister standing up for our country – it is his job, after all – Justin Trudeau, in his choice of time and place to say that Canada “will not be pushed around” displayed a stupidity far in excess of that for which his reputation is already well-established. When the G7 summit in Charlevoix, Quebec, commenced, a trade war was already impending between our two countries. Somehow, the leaders had managed to come to an agreement of sorts and an official communication of this had been sent out before Donald Trump took off to Singapore to negotiate what will hopefully be the end of hostilities on the Korean peninsula with Kim Jong-un. It was then that Trudeau called a press conference and uttered his now infamous words, which, given at that particular moment, could only be understood as gloating at having won one over on Trump. This earned him, as was undoubtedly his intention, the admiration of anti-American leftists around the world, but, as with so much other of his grandstanding, it is ordinary Canadians who will have to pay the price in the upcoming trade war which our country simply cannot win. Trudeau has shown his contempt for the teachings of the Holy Scriptures on many occasions but it would have served him well to have read over Luke 14:28-32 before he shot his mouth off and applied its literal meaning even if he continued to ignore the intended spiritual application.

Not only was it the wrong time and place for Trudeau to boast about standing up for Canadians, he was the wrong person to do so. He might have thought that he was simply imitating Trump’s Mr. Tough Guy nationalist rhetoric but there is a huge difference. Trump, for as long as he has been in politics has taken his stand on a hard core, America First, Buchananite, populist-nationalist platform. Trudeau, on the other hand, has worked hard to establish the reputation of being the same kind of left-liberal, cosmopolitan, globalist citizen-of-the-world that his father was. The idea that he would ever put the interests of Canadians ahead of whatever inane brain rot is the latest fashion among liberal intellectuals (2) is laughable.

Consider his track record. His biggest concern in picking the Ministers to fill his Cabinet was not their competency but that the levels of estrogen and testosterone be equal. Feminist ideology and the adoration of the multitudes of young people who have been brainwashed by universities into swallowing that mindless tripe, took precedence for him over the interest of ordinary Canadians in the Ministries of Her Majesty’s government being competently administered. One of the very first things he did in office was to take Canadian taxpayers’ dollars, use it to bring large numbers of the economic migrants invading Europe under the pretence of being refugees from the Syrian Civil War over here, and then take more of the Canadian taxpayers’ dollars to bribe Canadian employers into giving the “refugees” jobs instead of Canadians. He then bullied anyone who objected to this by accusing them of racism. (3)

Trudeau’s attitude towards the Canadian energy industry can only be described as one of arrogant hostility and while this might earn him brownie points with the green gang it does not benefit the average Canadian and works against the interests of all the Canadians employed by the energy industry directly but also those who depend upon the jobs available in an economy that itself is heavily dependent upon affordable energy to survive. He has shut down most of the pipeline projects that would have benefited Canadians across the Dominion, constantly sided with anti-pipeline agitators that are funded by foreign energy interests, and, rather than use force to protect the rights of the petroleum company that had jumped through all sorts of ridiculous loops to obtain legal permission to expand an existing pipeline, opted to buy out the pipeline at the taxpayers’ expence. He has imposed a carbon tax upon the country, driving the cost of gas through the roof, for absolutely no good reason, (4) hurting the most those who were already just barely getting by on the wages from jobs that require vehicular transportation to get to. He has imposed massive debt on future generations of Canadian taxpayers with his runaway defecits, which include large amounts of spending on global projects that do not benefit Canadians, and has increased the cost of living, while reducing the ability of most Canadians to pay through tax increases.

If Canadians have only recently begun to feel the impact of Trudeau’s green agenda on their pocketbooks, we have so far been shielded from the full impact of his anti-business agenda on Canadian employment by the relatively free trade that has existed between our country and the United States, thus allowing us to benefit from economic boom the United States has seen since the election of Donald Trump. That will no longer be the case if Trudeau has gotten us into an unwinnable trade war. Note that I say this as an economic patriot not as a doctrinaire free trader. The basic idea of economic patriotism is that of doing what is best for the economic interests of your country. (5) It is not in your country’s best interests to piss off your largest trading partner, especially if that partner has much more economic clout than you do. Neither, however, is it in your country’s economic best interests to sign free trade agreements that make your country that vulnerable in the first place. Trudeau’s foolish words today would not have the potential to harm us today if Brian Mulroney had not betrayed his party’s historical platform (6) thirty years ago and signed the Canada-US Free Trade Agreement that later evolved into NAFTA and which plunged us into three decades of addictive dependency on free trade.

What will eventually come out of all of this only time can tell. What we do know is that we have no reason whatsoever to be proud of our lousy Prime Minister who serious needs to learn to keep his hubristic tongue in his mouth.

(1) The other, of course, being Sir John A. MacDonald.

(2) When I use the word “intellectuals” I have in mind the way Paul Johnson uses the word in his book of that title (Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1988) and the following quotation from the late, great, Tom Wolfe: “We must be careful to make a distinction between the intellectual and the person of intellectual achievement. The two are very, very different animals. There are people of intellectual achievement who increase the sum of human knowledge, the powers of human insight, and analysis. And then there are the intellectuals. An intellectual is a person knowledgeable in one field who speaks out only in others. Starting in the early twentieth century, for the first time an ordinary storyteller, a novelist, a short story writer, a poet, a playwright, in certain cases a composer, an artist, or even an opera singer could achieve a tremendous eminence by becoming morally indignant about some public issue. It required no intellectual effort whatsoever. Suddenly he was elevated to a plane from which he could look down upon ordinary people. Conversely — this fascinates me — conversely, if you are merely a brilliant scholar, merely someone who has added immeasurably to the sum of human knowledge and the powers of human insight, that does not qualify you for the eminence of being an intellectual.”

(3) Berkeley professor and former Clinton cabinet secretary Robert Reich maintains that blaming economic stress on immigrants is the sign of an ascending tyrant. This is nonsense. A much more reliable observer, Aristotle, noted almost two and a half millennia ago that a tyrant, unlike a true king, prefers and trusts foreigners over his own people. Politika, Book V.

(4) A carbon tax is an idiotic notion dreamed up in hell by the devil himself. A) CO2 is not a pollutant – it is naturally exhaled by all human and animal life and the more of it in the atmosphere, the better for plant life. B) Over 90% of the Greenhouse Effect is produced by water vapour and CO2 is only a fraction of the remainder. C) The Greenhouse Effect is a good thing not a bad thing – without it the earth would be a lifeless ball of ice. D) Climate has been constantly changing throughout all of history and until all of the causes of this are understood and taken into account – and climate science is not even remotely close to starting to have done this – there can be no way of telling how much recent climate change has been caused by human factors. E) The modern warming trend that is blamed on the burning of fossil fuels actually began with the end of the Little Ice Age decades before the industrial boom and included a forty-year period of cooling after World War II which coincided in time with a large rise in CO2 emissions due to accelerating industrialism. F) The “proof” for the theories of climate-change alarmists is not evidence from real world observations but the simulations of computer models. G) The global warming/climate change scare has been a deliberate fraud since day one. The day on which it was presented to a US Senate Subcommittee in 1988 was consciously chosen to be the statistically hottest day in summer, the summaries of the UN’s IPCC’s reports on climate change were written by environmental bureaucrats and released prior to the science reports which were then redacted to fit the summaries. H) “There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. Period” – Michael Crichton. I) Scientists funded by governments and international agencies like the UN are just as likely to provide the results they are paid to provide as scientists funded by petroleum companies.

(5) Adam Smith and David Ricardo’s theories of absolute and comparative advantage ought to be considered, when determining what is best for your country, but they ought not to be treated as outweighing all other considerations.

(6) The Conservative government of Canada’s first Prime Minister, Sir John A. MacDonald, introduced its “National Policy” to the public in 1876 (they had been discussing it internally since the 1860s), campaigned on it in 1878, and put it in practice in 1879. The policy was similar to that adopted by the new Republican Party in the United States a decade earlier and that which would be adopted by the government of the newly unified Germany – protecting domestic manufacturers with tariffs and the use of government revenue on internal infrastructure improvements, which in Canada’s case meant the construction of the Canadian Pacific Railroad. The policy worked quite well in developing the manufacturing base of all three countries, by contrast with the free trade practice introduced in England, the birthplace of industrialism, at the behest of the Manchester manufacturers. While it was agricultural tariffs (the Corn Laws) the latter sought to repeal, their practice of free trade in this same period that America and Germany were practicing economic nationalism led to their falling behind the USA in industrial development. The Canadian Conservative “National Policy” was something of a last-option-available measure initially, but it worked for Canada for almost a century, and it became a fixed plank in the Conservative platform until Mulroney removed it. The old Conservatives believed it to be necessary, not only for the protection of Canada’s own industries and resources, but for her political and cultural protection as well (at least the cultural protection of English Canada, the Victorian-era British culture of which did not have the built-in protection against Americanization of a language barrier like French Canada). The Liberals were the party that wanted free trade and Americanization. Today’s Grits are not likely to admit to being the party of the latter, although they obviously base their policies on what the craziest trend in Hollywood is at any given moment, spewing left-wing anti-Americanism of the sort that Jean-François Revel so ably exposed as irrational in his 2004 monograph of that title. Nevertheless, it was openly admitted by Liberal thinkers of the past such as Goldwyn Smith and John Wesley Dafoe. Their economic arguments and historical interpretations in favour of the Liberal project of undoing Confederation and moving Canada into the American orbit were fully rebutted by Harold Innis, Donald Creighton, and Eugene Forsey.

Patriot Faith Goldy Leads Hundreds In Quebec Border Protest Rally

Posted on by
Patriot Faith Goldy Leads Hundreds In Quebec Border Protest Rally
As the waves of blue Quebec flags and Canadian Red Ensigns moved forward on June 3rd, they were joined by another wave of supporters bearing red Ontario and Mohawk flags.
A very small and ineffective group of Antifa’s arrived holding banners displaying misspelt messages against “patriarchy,” “racism,” and “hate.”
Faith Goldy spoke, thanking the participants and thanking Quebec for being the centre of modern Canadian patriotism.
We at Immigration Watch Canada wish to thank each of you who helped support this important event.
HIGHLIGHTS:
For sensible immigration policies for the 21st century.
See what’s happening on our social sites

“Albert Einstein, both a scientific fraud and a racial hypocrite.

Posted on by
“Albert Einstein, both a scientific fraud and a racial hypocrite.
 https://www.theguardian.com/ books/2018/jun/12/einsteins- travel-diaries-reveal- shocking-xenophobia”
Einstein

You Must Watch This Video: China’s Millionaire Migration (100,000) to Vancouver

Posted on by

You Must Watch This Video: China’s Millionaire Migration (100,000) to Vancouver

Over 100,000 Chinese millionaires have moved to Vancouver, sparking everything from a reality show to a property boom making housing unaffordable. Dateline asks if the millionaire migrants are a blessing or curse. For more on Aaron Thomas’ story, go to the SBS Dateline website… http://bit.ly/27ZRLXz
Comments are disabled for this video.
 
 Note that the comments section is disabled. There must have been some red pilled or newly awakened Canadians angrily responding to this invasion in which we were never consulted.

RALLY AGAINST THE ILLEGALS

Posted on by
RALLY AGAINST THE ILLEGALS
Hosted by Faith Goldy
Rally: Border Action NOW
CANADA IS BEING INVADED BY ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS!
Since PM Trudeau sent out his #WelcomeToCanada tweet to the world, over 50,000 illegals have entered Canada.
Of those who have illegally entered, over 20,000 have done so by foot across Canada’s southern border, which has been erased without a democratic mandate.
THERE IS A SIMPLE SOLUTION: MAKE THE ENTIRE BORDER AN OFFICIAL PORT OF ENTRY.
With this, RCMP officers would be relieved of their bellhop duties and CBSA could get to work turning away illegal migrants.
NOTES FOR EVENT:
- Canadian maple, Red Ensign, and provincial flags ONLY
- please be respectful in any signage you bring
- no face masks
- no single group is hosting this event but we want to ensure the best representation of nationalists and patriots for any media who might be present
INVITE ALL YOUR FRIENDS AND FAMILY!
Sunday, June 3 at 3 PM – 6 PM
Category: Uncategorized | Tags: ,

Would You Invite a Rattlesnake Into Your Home? Canada Did!

Posted on by
Would You Invite a Rattlesnake Into Your Home? Canada Did!
May 29, 2018
PART 1

If Trudeau and his government need more evidence of China’s sinister intentions in Canada, here is a summary of the evidence that a joint RCMP-CSIS report gave Ottawa about 20 years ago. This report is even more relevant today.

(1) The report was sub-titled “SIDEWINDER”. That is a comparison of Mainland China to a rattlesnake. It is another way of saying that it was foolish to have allowed a rattlesnake into Canada. The purpose of the joint RCMP-CSIS project was “to assess the extent of the threat posed by the acquisition and control of Canadian companies by members or associates of Chinese triads (organized crime) and those with affiliations to Chinese Intelligence (Spy) Services”. (P.3)

(2) When Deng Xiaoping took over China in the late 1970’s, he introduced his economic reforms with the slogan “To get rich is glorious”. However, he and his regime knew nothing about how the West and capitalism operated, so they went to the richest Chinese in Hong Kong and to Chinese organized crime (triads) for advice. In return, Deng gave these groups privileged access to China’s economy. Triads were involved in illegality: gambling, extortion, prostitution, human trafficking and even political assassinations. Deng referred to the triads as “patriotic groups”.

(3) A significant presence of organized crime was detected in “investor” immigrants from Hong Kong to Canada from the mid-1980’s on. This presence consisted of two groups (A) Very rich Chinese business people who had been known to be co-operating with the Mainland Chinese government for years and (B) Associates and relatives of China’s leadership and the Chinese Intelligence (Spy) Service (ChIS). Co-operation between Hong Kong tycoons, triads and the Beijing leadership raised the level of the threat. Mainland China was looking for Canadian technology and for ways to interfere in Canada. In order to understand what Mainland China intended, Canadians had to be made aware of unique Chinese concepts such as “debt of honour”, “duties” “Hou Tai or backers, and “Guanxi or connections”. These concepts placed cultural obligations on Chinese to one another vs to Canada.

(4) As of 1997, over 200 Canadian companies were under the direct or indirect control of China. Many Canadians will be shocked to learn that one of those 200 companies is the CIBC, one of Canada’s five largest banks. Another major bank in Canada under Mainland China’s control is the Hong Kong Bank of Canada



(5) Also as of 1907, examples of other Chinese-controlled “Canadian” companies were CITIC, Norinco, Husky Oil, Grand Adex Properties Inc., Merril Lynch, Gordon Capital Inc., Tai Foong International, Ramada Hotels, China Vision, and Semi-Tech Corporation). (Editor’s Note: Because Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien’s government ignored the recommendations of Sidewinder and even ordered it to be destroyed, the number of companies now controlled by Mainland China is almost certainly exponentially higher.)

(6) The Chinese government has gained influence in Canadian politics by maximizing their presence over some of this country’s economic levers. The steps in Chinese strategy were as follows : (a) Buy a “Canadian” company so as to obtain a “local identity”, legally concealing their foreign identity. (b) Under the “Canadian” banner, the Chinese-Canadian company then invests or buys other companies in various Canadian economic sectors. Control lies in Hong Kong or Beijing. The financial benefits of research, often paid for by Ottawa or the provinces are likely to go to Asia. The financial network of Chinese entrepreneurs (connected with triads or Beijing) has grown exponentially and very rapidly in Canada. Their influence over local, provincial and national political leaders has also increased. Chinese entrepreneurs have offered company board positions to Canadian politicians. Many of these company boards are China-owned.

(7) These companies are eligible to receive Canadian government subsidies for research or to bid on classified contracts from Federal Departments. The risks to Canada were that : (A) After the research is done, it can be transferred to China. and (B) Access gained to classified contracts is gained for China. Two examples of noticeable risk: (a) A Canadian company under Mainland Chinese influence competed for a contract to set up and run a classified communications system that linked the main agencies of the Canadian Intelligence community!!! This would enable the Chinese to obtain access to sensitive information. (b) A Chinese multinational bought a Canadian company that specialized in video surveillance. Both of these companies may have installed security systems for various Canadian government institutions or Canadian research industries. China thus had access to information it would never have obtained directly.

 

Canada: Trudeau’s “dishonest” speech to NYU blasts nationalism, draws ridicule

Posted on by

Canada: Trudeau’s “dishonest” speech to NYU blasts nationalism, draws ridicule

In an article from Maclean’s Magazine: “Trudeau and his team have worked hard at sucking up to Trump,” yet Trudeau delivered “a borderline rebuke” of Trump. While doing it, he clumsily tried to extricate himself from being the divisive, Islamic-supremacist pushing, morally defunct leader that he is. Trudeau told New York University students to “embrace diversity” and “reject nationalism.” Those were his code words for “support open borders and the Islamization of the West.” He went on:

Let me be very clear: this is not an endorsement of moral relativism, or a declaration that all points of view are valid. Female genital mutilation is wrong, no matter how many generations have practiced it.

Indeed, FGM is wrong. So are honor killings, wife-beating, stonings, murdering gays, rape of infidels, beheadings, killing infidels, persecuting Christians, restricting the freedom of speech, etc. This is why the former Conservative government of Canada introduced the Zero Tolerance on Barbaric Cultural Practices Act, an Act that was rejected by the Trudeau Liberals.

Trudeau also stated:

“Let yourself be vulnerable to another point of view” accompanied by rote denunciations of accompanying sins. One must not “cocoon ourselves in an ideological, social or intellectual bubble,” he implored, or “engage only with people with whom we already agree,” but instead “fight our tribal mind-set” and the dreaded “identity politics.”

Had Trudeau been advising Islamic supremacists, his words would be sensible, but he is referring to conservatives who pride themselves on the standing for principles including free speech,  diversity of thought, and the equality of rights of all people before the law. How can anyone trust Trudeau on tough issues such as the global jihad when he’s busy on tours humiliating himself and his nation? Canada’s Prime Minister was even the subject of a hit piece in, of all places, the Washington Post, entitled “Justin Trudeau’s appallingly dishonest speech to NYU.”

The two articles below — from Maclean’s and the WaPo — expose a man who is unfit to be a leader. While they expose his silliness, the larger issue is his promotion of Islamic supremacists. In the words of Alberta United Conservative leader Jason Kenney (former Citizenship and Immigration leader under Stephen Harper): “Trudeau is an empty trust-fund millionaire who has the political depth of a finger bowl.”

“Justin Trudeau delivers a borderline rebuke of Donald Trump”, by Stephen Maher, Maclean’s Magazine, May 16, 2018:

Justin Trudeau came as close as he should ever come on Wednesday to denouncing Donald Trump.

Standing at second base of Yankee Stadium—where the U.S. president has box seats—Trudeau spent 20 minutes telling the 2018 graduating class of New York University to embrace diversity, to reject nationalism.

Young New Yorkers like Trudeau, seeing him as the anti-Trump—the handsome young feminist from Canada—and the students cheered whenever his smiling face appeared on the jumbotron during the commencement address.

If they have heard about his misadventures in India, they showed no sign of it.

Trudeau didn’t mention Trump, but none of the thousands of students and parents sitting in the drizzle listening to Trudeau could have missed the point.

He didn’t just mention in passing, as he does in every Canadian speech, that diversity is strength. It seemed to be the whole point of coming to Trump’s home ballpark to address the students of one of the most Liberal colleges in the United States.

He is walking a fine line with this kind of thing. No political issue is more important to the government of Canada than managing the trade relationship with the United States.

Trudeau and his team have worked hard at sucking up to Trump and his team in the hopes of stopping him from destroying NAFTA. You can tell that the Trudeau team has done a good job at it—involving business people, diplomats and former prime minister Brian Mulroney—because the Conservatives don’t accuse them of flubbing it. It’s the one issue that is so important to Canadians that it’s beyond partisan politics……

“Let me be very clear: this is not an endorsement of moral relativism, or a declaration that all points of view are valid. Female genital mutilation is wrong, no matter how many generations have practiced it. Anthropogenic climate change is real, no matter how much some folks want to deny it.”

Here in the Bronx, where Trump won just nine per cent of the vote in the 2016 presidential election, the students gave their loudest cheers of the day for that line.

Trudeau told the students that appealing to tribalism is the easiest way for leaders to rally support, but building common ground between tribes is a higher calling……

“Justin Trudeau’s appallingly dishonest speech to NYU”, by J.J. McCullough, Washington Post, May 17, 2018:

As is common among sheltered men of extreme privilege, when Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau attempts to share relatable thoughts on modern life, his words tend to expose a speaker who has no actual familiarity with social trends but has clearly been briefed to their existence. The commencement speech he delivered Wednesday at New York University is a classic study of an obliviously cloistered poseur trying desperately to feign compliance with current fashions. A belabored reference to Pokémon Go was the least of it.

Trudeau — or whatever team of speechwriters and handlers who do the heavy thinking on his behalf — seems broadly aware that North America is mired in a state of intense sociopolitical polarization, and that amid all this shouting and anger, it is the role of great minds to reassert the case for virtues of free speech and intellectual diversity.

Such was the tone Trudeau’s NYU speech correspondingly struck, with tender protestations to

“let yourself be vulnerable to another point of view” accompanied by rote denunciations of accompanying sins. One must not “cocoon ourselves in an ideological, social or intellectual bubble,” he implored, or “engage only with people with whom we already agree,” but instead “fight our tribal mind-set” and the dreaded “identity politics.”

To be sure, these are good sentiments. Unfortunately, there is no evidence whatsoever that Trudeau takes them seriously in the context where his opinions most matter: his performance as Canada’s ruler……

 

We’re Being Colonized—With Ottawa’s Help—Part 3

Posted on by

We’re Being Colonized—With Ottawa’s Help—Part 3

Tue, May 01, 2018   |   Author: Ron Gray   |   Volume 25    Issue 18

We’ve looked at what has made the current colonization of Canada possible and how the Trudeau Liberals have abandoned their responsibility to protect us. Now the question must be asked, “Does Islam need protection from us or do we need protection from Islam?”

Do you really think the money pouring into the coffers of our universities is intended to improve higher education in Canada? Why would Saudi Arabia, with about 60 percent illiteracy, want to improve education in Canada and the USA?

(Oh, I know the official statistics say that 96 percent of Saudis are literate; but you have to understand that Saudi citizenship, officially, is mostly limited to the lineal descendants of Aziz ibn Saud and his 13 wives; about ⅔ of today’s residents of Arabia are not Saudis, but immigrant workers—slaves, in fact—from Pakistan, Indonesia, and Africa. So the real literacy statistics are very, very different from the official ones.)

No, that money pouring in to our universities is intended to lay the groundwork for the on-going colonization of Canada, in preparation for adding us to the emerging global caliphate.

In the Islamic world view, according to all four strains of Islamic jurisprudence, the entire globe is divided into two houses: Dar al-Islam, which means “The House of Submission”—that is, submission to the ideology of Islam; and Dar al-Harb, which means “The House of War.”

Folks, they already declared war on us a long, long time ago! Now they’re infiltrating a fifth column—with Justin Trudeau’s eager help: he’s not really importing “refugees”—because they’re not real refugees at all; almost all of them had already been resettled in Jordan, Lebanon, or Turkey—what he’s importing are Liberal-voters-in-training, to ensure his continuing majority in Parliament.

Did you think his concern was humanitarian? Think again! When a reporter asked him, as he began to fulfill his campaign promise to bring 25,000 Syrian refugees to Canada, whether he would give preference to the most-endangered victims of the Syrian civil war—the Christians and Yazidis—his answer was revealing: “Absolutely NOT!”

What Mr. Trudeau doesn’t realize is that pro-Islamic politicians, like Omar Alghabra and Iqra Khalid will only support democracy until the colonization of Canada is sufficient to crush our pandering politicians clinging to their naive mindset that all world views are equal; after that, democracy is just a dead camel, to be dragged back out of the tent. So is nationalism, because the Islamic world view visualizes a global ummah, ruled by a central caliphate, with no borders… just like the Ottoman Empire that ruled most of the Middle East for 500 years, until it was dismantled at the end of the First World War.

Let me repeat: we’re being colonized—with our own money, and with the eager help of Justin Trudeau’s dumber-than-dirt Liberal government. They’ve sold our freedom for their political gain. Our children, rather than learning to think logically, are being spoon fed political tripe imported, ostensibly for our good, by dictators. On the chopping block are our freedom and equality

Wait a minute: am I being Islamophobic?

No! To quote Justin Trudeau: “Absolutely not!”

A phobia is an irrational fear. But when more than a billion and a half people are being led by imams inspired by a book that many of them have never read, a book that commands them, more than 100 times, to kill all non-Muslims, or to reduce to slavery the few they might allow to live, it’s not irrational to take them at their word. It’s prudent. Scripture says a wise man sees danger coming, and takes steps to protect himself and his family.

Political Islam is deadly, and it’s dangerous; so is Justin Trudeau’s appeasement of militant Muslims like Omar Alghabra, Iqra Khalid and Omar Khadr and the next three jihadis waiting in line for their ten million dollar payouts; and so is our importation of tens of thousands of un-vetted queue-jumpers and border-hoppers, and our Parliament’s gullible, ignorant contemplation of M-103.

Three Islamic nations are competing right now to become the hegemon of a revived Ottoman Empire: Saudi Arabia, Iran and Turkey. Whichever one wins that struggle plans eventually to take over the whole world, because that’s exactly what the Koran commands.

So—do we really stand on guard for Canada, glorious and free? Or will we allow ourselves to become a colony in submission to the Caliphate?

It’s time to stand up with the CHP and all freedom-loving Canadians and oppose creeping Sharia.

Otherwise, hold out your wrists, and accept your shackles.

RCMP Build Hostel for Illegals on Quebec Border & Are Hostile to Investigative Reporters

Posted on by
RCMP Build Hostel for Illegals on Quebec Border & Are Hostile to Investigative Reporters
 
 
faith-goldy
 


 
 FBM and Faith Goldy Reporting From Illegal Border Crossing Point on Quebec/New York Border

 

WHITE GENOCIDE CELEBRATED AT EIFFEL TOWER

Posted on by
WHITE GENOCIDE CELEBRATED AT EIFFEL TOWER

By Mike King 

Here at TomatoBubble.com, your favorite investigative reporter and his ferocious feline sidekick scour the Internet to bring you news and views that “they” don’t want you to know about. Often times, we end up dismissing some of our most outrageous findings simply because, upon closer inspection, the claim cannot be substantiated to our satisfaction. We simply refuse to play the “anonymous sources” game.

We recently stumbled across an item which we found so profoundly disturbing that we initially suspected it to be a hoax for the simple reason that it was just a bit too“in your face” to be true. But alas, because the hour of “their” final triumph approaches so rapidly and so unimpeded, “they” evidently believe that there is no longer anything to fear about such blatant in-your-faceness as what we are about to present. We are sorry to have to say that the following story of the Paris White Genocide mural, and its creator’s background and connections, is indeed accurate.

WARNING!

SOME OF THE IMAGERY BELOW, THOUGH CARTOONISH IN NATURE, IS OBSCENE AND VIOLENT

A giant mural painting on the floor below Paris’ iconic Eiffel Tower was completed in September of 2016 by a Los Angeles-based artist named Cleon Peterson. The bizarre “work of art” is titled, “Endless Sleep” — an obvious reference to the coming “endless sleep” of the White Race. There is really no need for us to interpret the meaning of Peterson’s obscenity. To all but the most brain-dead libtard, the massive 500 square-meter image, best viewed from the top of the Eiffel Tower while looking straight down, speaks for itself.

Have a look:

 

 

1. Cleon Peterson    2 & 3: Black figures are superimposed over the White characters, as a Black male and White female embrace passionately in the center. The linked arms of the Blacks form a 6-pointed Star of David

 

The Star of David at the center is an obvious tribute to the terrible Tribe that is behind White Genocide and to the House of Rothschild in particular. But don’t take our word for it. Here it is, from a tweet, from Peterson himself:

 

 

Peterson, an “ex” heroine addict, tweeted out his gratitude to French banking couple Benjamin and Ariane de Rothschild. We suspect (though we have no solid evidence to present) that the “gratitude” is related to Peterson (with 10 helpers) having been commissioned to paint the disgusting White Genocide mural.

 

Should there be any remaining doubt as to what the Eiffel Tower floor mural truly symbolizes, a review of the self-loathing artist’s earlier works — depicting what he refers to as “the hedonistic triumphs of those who recognize themselves as victorious in the unfolding mirror of history” — clearly confirms what Peterson and the Rothschilds are dreaming about. Be forewarned, these images are obscene and unsettling.

 

DON’T SAY WE DIDN’T WARN YOU!

– and don’t send us nasty E-mails for publishing them.

***

 

Before hooking up with the Rothschilds and painting Paris, Peterson was known for churning out scenes of torture, rape and mass murder of White people at the hands of Blacks — a perfect hireling for the Rothschilds!

*

Plenty more such as this.

 

In his 1925 book ‘Praktischer Idealismus’, the half-Austrian / half-Japanese Globalist Count Richard Coundehove Kalergi boldly declared that the citizens of the future “United States of Europe” will not be White people anymore. In his own words, the man who is today regarded as one of the founders of “modern Europe” revealed the game:
“The man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-negroid race of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with the diversity of individuals.

 

Of course, Kalergi’s chosenite paymasters will not be replaced or blended out by this “Eurasian-negroid race of the future”. Wrote the hired hack of his beloved Rothschild bosses:

 

“Instead of destroying European Judaism, Europe, against her will, refined and educated this people, driving them to their future status as a leading nation through this artificial evolutionary process. It’s not surprising that the people that escaped from the Ghetto-Prison, became the spiritual nobility of Europe. Thus, the compassionate care given by Europe created a new breed of aristocrats. This happened when the European feudal aristocracy crashed because of the emancipation of the Jews.”

 

The artistic abomination at the Eiffel Tower is “The Kalergi Plan” — in paint. The end game is upon us, and for those who think that the final stages of genocide will be manifested by a peaceful and gradual blending-out of the last remaining non-elite White Europeans, Peterson’s previous paintings, and Rothschild’s evident affinity for them, ought to dispel that delusion once and for all.

 

 

  

Kalergi, writing on behalf of Rothschild & Friends, foresaw the current Turd World invasion of Europe. If they have their way, the end to an aging and morally decadent White Europe will come violently for many. 

.