Replacing the European Founding/Settler People Just Can’t Wait: Holidays are cancelled due to COVID, but immigration

Posted on by

Holidays are cancelled due to COVID, but immigration resumes

Holidays are cancelled due to COVID, but immigration resumes

Canada’s immigration and border restrictions are set to ease up tomorrow after an extended coronavirus lockdown. 

Starting October 8, extended family members of Canadians, as well as those visiting Canada on compassionate grounds, will be allowed to cross the border provided they quarantine for 14 days. Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship Canada has also announced that beginning October 13, permanent residents and new Canadians will again be allowed to apply to sponsor grandparents and parents to immigrate to Canada. The refugee hearing process resumed in August. 

But despite an easing of restrictions for refugees, immigrants and visitors to cross the border, holidays are being cancelled across Canada as politicians urge Canadians to not celebrate in an attempt to stop the spread of COVID-19. 

In New Brunswick, at least one town is cancelling Halloween, banning the door-to-door festivities out of fear of the virus. Many municipalities in Ontario are likewise considering pulling the plug on the ghoulish night. 

Ontario Premier Doug Ford has also urged families to stay apart this Thanksgiving, stating “This Thanksgiving, we’re asking that you spend the holiday with just your household.” He continued on to clarify, “That means sitting down for dinner with the people you live with.”

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau echoed Ford’s sentiments, going so far as to suggest that Canadians should be concerned about the fate of their Christmas. Trudeau went on to say that Canada’s largest provinces were already experiencing a “second wave” of COVID-19.

In August, Chief Public Health Officer Theresa Tam stated the coronavirus pandemic could extend into 2022 according to new models, which also predict up to 16,000 dead by the end of 2020. Later, Tam asserted that up to 50% of Canadians would have to be vaccinated in order to “shift towards normal.”

Category: Uncategorized

Teacher Who Showed Pictures Of Mohammed BEHEADED In France By Man Shouting “Allahu Akbar”

Posted on by

Teacher Who Showed Pictures Of Mohammed BEHEADED In France By Man Shouting “Allahu Akbar”

SpencerFernando

October 16, 20200

A brutal and savage terrorist act.

A horrific and savage act of terrorism has been perpetrated in France.

A middle school history teacher had shown photos of the Muslim prophet Muhammed to students.

Then, a student shouting “Allahu Akbar” BEAHEADED the teacher in the street with a knife.

Afterwards, the student was confronted by police in the town of Eragny-sur-Oise near Paris, and shot.

The terrorist later died of their injuries.

According to someone who spoke to the French paper Le Parisien, “‘The victim had recently given a lesson to his students on freedom of expression and had shown the caricatures of Muhammad’. The murdered teacher was later identified as Samuel P.

His lesson led to an enraged man confronting him with a knife, and then cutting his head off, said the source.

The dead suspected terrorist was described as an 18-year-old who was born in Moscow, and who had links with the school.”

It is believed the student is a Chechen, one of about 30,000 Chechens who fled the war in Russia and went to France – including many with past combat experience.

The terrorist also apparently put up a video of the attack, including him holding the severed head of the teacher.

The authorities have said they are investigating the attack as terrorism. French President Emmanuel Macron is set to visit the area after holding an emergency meeting.

Spencer Fernando

Photo – YouTube Recommended

If Trudeau Was Really 'Focused On Canadians,' He Wouldn't Have Shut Down Parliament

If Trudeau Was Really ‘Focused O…spencerfernando.com

Despite Being In Power For 5 Years, Trudeau Just Blamed Harper For Canada's Pandemic Failures

Despite Being In Power For 5 Years…spencerfernando.com

WATCH: Poilievre Destroys Trudeau In Question Period

WATCH: Poilievre Destroys Trudeau…spencerfernando.com

WATCH: Arrogant Trudeau Brags About Bribing The Media With Your Money

WATCH: Arrogant Trudeau Brags Ab…spencerfernando.com

WATCH: The Video The Liberals Don't Want You To See

WATCH: The Video The Liberals Don’t…spencerfernando.com

Conservatives Right To Warn Bank Of Canada Against Doing Trudeau's Bidding

Conservatives Right To Warn Bank Of…spencerfernando.com

The Elites Want Us Scared, Desperate, And Unhealthy

The Elites Want Us Scared, Desperate…spencerfernando.com

NDP Props Up Liberals Again, Blocks Investigation Of WE Charity Scandal

NDP Props Up Liberals Again, Bl…spencerfernando.comAddThis

TRENDING NOW

0 Article Rating

Like this:

Loading…

Related posts

FBI Arrests Man For Plotting ISIS-Style Terrorist Attack On San Francisco

December 22, 2017

Louvre Attacker Came To Paris From United Arab Emirates On Tourist Visa

February 3, 2017

Islamist Yelling “Allahu Akbar” Kills One, Wounds Six Others In Hamburg Germany

July 28, 2017 Posted in News, PoliticsTagged France, France Beheading, Terrorism Subscribe

guest

0 Comments

SUBSCRIBE

Enter your email address to subscribe to spencerfernando.com and receive notifications of new articles by email.

Email Address

Recent Articles

Follow Spencer Fernando on Facebook

Search for: National Citizens Coalition

Spencer Fernando is writing a weekly column as a Campaign Fellow for the National Citizens Coalition. Visit their website at the link below:

National Citizens Coalition ***TRENDING***

Despite Being In Power For 5 Years, Trudeau Just Blamed Harper For Canada's Pandemic Failures
China Is Openly Threatening 300,000 Canadian Citizens
After Threats, Canada Must Order China's Ambassador To Leave Our Country
Conservatives Right To Warn Bank Of Canada Against Doing Trudeau's Bidding
LIES: While Liberals Block Investigations, Trudeau Falsely Claims He's Been "Open And Transparent"
WATCH: Poilievre Destroys Trudeau In Question Period
WATCH: Arrogant Trudeau Brags About Bribing The Media With Your Money
WATCH: The Video The Liberals Don't Want You To See
If Trudeau Was Really 'Focused On Canadians,' He Wouldn't Have Shut Down Parliament

Comments PolicyPrivacy

Terms of Service Search Search for: Menu

Copyright © 2020 Spencer Fernando. All Rights Reserved. Boston Theme by FameThemes

aBeheading.png%26width%3D640%26height%3D366&csi=undefined&rev=v8.28.7-wp&ct=1&xld=1&xd=1″>

Read more

Disturbing: The Real Agenda Behind The United Nations Push Against Global Warming

Disturbing: The Real Agenda Behind The United Nations Push A…spencerfernando.com

Trudeau Government Ripped For Forcing Canada To Partner With Chinese Military On Vaccine

Trudeau Government Ripped For Forcing Canada To Partner Wit…spencerfernando.com

Why Do 'Environmentalists' Support Increasing Immigration Levels?

Why Do ‘Environmentalists’ Support Increasing Im…spencerfernando.comAddThis

GET THE LATEST UPDATES!

Enter your email below to receive updates from Spencer Fernando.

Category: Uncategorized

The West should cease trading with China – and yes, there are alternative sources of rare Earths

Posted on by

The West should cease trading with China – and yes, there are alternative sources of rare Earths  – Don’t Panic about Rare Earth Elements. If that happened the odds are that it would result in the  overthrow of the  CCP.  Anything less than that and China will become ever stronger. RH 

Don’t Panic about Rare Earth ElementsJeremy HsuThe materials used in iPhones and Tesla cars need not become a long-term casualty of a U.S.-China trade war

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/16300/china-containment

The Containment of China

by Lawrence A. Franklin
August 4, 2020 at 5:00 am

Share395
The Containment of ChinaLawrence A. FranklinAfter China’s many transgressions over the past 50 years… the military containment of Chinese expansionism and…

Translations of this item:

FrenchGermanItalianSpanish
  • After China’s many transgressions over the past 50 years… the military containment of Chinese expansionism and Communist Party Chairman Xi Jinping’s stated goal of world domination needs to be the highest foreign policy priority of the Free World.
  • Countries could also be enjoined to cancel all commercial activity with China. Why fund one’s enemy and make him stronger?
  • China’s walk-in-the-park takeover of Hong Kong — an illegal appropriation — undoubtedly served to whet China’s expansionist appetite.
  • The firm tone of Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s July 13 declaration that the U.S. rejects China’s fake claims in the South China Sea as mostly illegal will probably be seen as “just words.” The U.S. might need to convince Beijing that the U.S. and its allies have the political will to implement this containment.
  • China’s leaders are surely hoping that the current U.S. administration’s aversion to war will enable the Communists to pick off new territory with relative ease; the U.S. should not even let them think of such a possibility.
  • The Chinese Communist Party’s narrative is that the U.S. administration is threatening all the people of China. One Chinese state CCTV anchor added that the “U.S. fights for greed and arrogance,” but that “China will fight for a new world.” It certainly will — if we let it.
After China’s many transgressions over the past 50 years, the military containment of Chinese expansionism and Communist Party Chairman Xi Jinping’s stated goal of world domination needs to be the highest foreign policy priority of the Free World. Pictured: China’s Long March 10, a new Jin-class nuclear submarine, participates in a naval parade Shandong province on April 23, 2019. (Photo by Mark Schiefelbein/AFP via Getty Images)

After China’s many transgressions over the past 50 years — including the theft of $600 billion of U.S. intellectual property each year; Beijing’s malignant cover-up of the Covid-19 virus; the Communist regime’s attempts to blind US airmen with lasers; constructing military islands in the South China Sea, and last month sending a massive fleet of 250 Chinese fishing vessels near the Galapagos Islands off the coast of Ecuador, to name but a few — the military containment of Chinese expansionism and Communist Party Chairman Xi Jinping’s stated goal of world domination needs to be the highest foreign policy priority of the Free World.

The ultimate objective of this initiative would be to prevent Communist China’s aggression against the independent states of the Indo-Pacific region and beyond.

China’s walk-in-the-park takeover of Hong Kong — an illegal appropriation — undoubtedly served to whet China’s expansionist appetite.

The first military containment of China could encompass a broad and multi-tiered defense perimeter in an arc extending from Japan’s coastal waters, southeast to the continent of Australia, and northwest to the Himalayan borderlands between China and India, where China has already been attempting a land invasion. Although China’s recent record of malign behavior has drawn the ire of many, China is encouragingly vulnerable. Fourteen states share sections of China’s land borders, and the Chinese already have territorial disputes with 18 countries.

The leaders of China’s Communist Party have been clear about China’s territorial claims, particularly in the South China Sea. China’s claim there, if realized, would include about 85% of the waters off China and most of the island archipelagos within the South China Sea. The United States needs to be unambiguously clear that it will physically block any Chinese effort to realize any baseless assertions of Chinese sovereignty. America’s determination also needs be transparent so that Chinese leaders do not doubt U.S. resolve, in case China might be tempted to check it by staging a violent incident.

The firm tone of Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s July 13 declaration that the U.S. rejects China’s fake claims in the South China Sea as mostly illegal will probably be seen as “just words.” The U.S. might need to convince Beijing that America and its allies have the political will to implement this containment. Pompeo also drew a line by asserting that the U.S. will defend the sovereignty of smaller South China Sea states — a conflict with China’s own often-stated claims.

For the U.S. to secure the endorsement of the Archipelago of Southeast Asian states, they first must be certain that the U.S. commitment to defend their sovereignty is unequivocal and permanent.

Many regional countries have been threatened by Chinese military assets and pushed to abandon their sovereign fishing and energy exploratory activities in waters claimed by China. In mid-June, for instance, a Chinese vessel rammed a Vietnamese fishing boat in disputed waters near the Paracel Islands, an archipelago chain claimed by both China and Vietnam. China in 2019-2020 continued to infuriate Indonesia by claiming sovereignty of waters inside Indonesia’s 200-mile economic zone, an area that would give Beijing sovereignty over the Indonesian Natuna Islands. In mid-April of this year, Malaysia was apparently shocked into the reality of China’s aggressive claims when a Chinese vessel, along with several Chinese Coast Guard vessels, boldly entered Malaysian waters clearly within Malaysia’s internationally recognized 200 hundred mile economic zone.

It seems to have been, however, the June 9, 2019 ramming and subsequent sinking of a Philippine fishing boat off Reed Bank in the Philippine Sea that had geopolitical ramifications. The incident happened shortly after Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte reversed himself and decided to keep a military defense pact with the U.S. His turnabout permitted continued U.S. access to Philippine air and naval bases, thus preserving the decades-long defense treaty between the U.S. and the Philippines, an important link in any wall to contain China.

Given the many examples of China’s aggressive behavior toward its neighbors, and with Taiwan now being openly threatened as well, another U.S. option, already undertaken, to lend substance to the military wall against China, was to send more U.S. military ships to the region to seriously increase the protection of the South China Sea, the American island of Guam, Ecuador and whatever else might be challenged.

A diplomatic plan might include a request that Australia — which has not only been unbudgeable despite Chinese pressure, but also has friendly ties with all governments in the area — host a summit of regional state political and military leaders. Representatives from the U.S., Japan, India, and Taiwan could attend, while permitting the host nation, Australia, to elicit the views and, one hopes, the commitment to contain the threat.

Subsequently, the U.S could dispatch policy and military teams to several regional states to discuss bilateral defense arrangements. These bilateral understandings could, in time, be linked up with already existing multinational defense organizations, such as “The Quad“: Japan, Australia, India and the U.S. In September, for the first time, all four members of the Quad will probably participate together in the India-hosted Malabar military exercises. This multinational barrier for containment could be further concretized by continuous regional military exercises, arms sales, military training exchange programs, and operational planning, as well as ports, bases, and airport visitations. Countries could also be enjoined to cancel all commercial activity with China. Why fund one’s enemy and make him stronger? This program functioned well in the Free World’s “Cold War” with the Soviet Union.

For this multinational initiative to survive and evolve into a formidable edifice to frustrate any Chinese territorial aspirations, the U.S. must lead “from the front” by frequent “Freedom of Navigation” operations through contested straits and other sensitive waterways to reinforce the legitimacy of international law on the high seas. Some of these freedom of navigation operations could be conducted in the Formosa (Taiwan) Strait between Taiwan and China. Another exercise could be in the disputed waters of the Tokara and Miyako Straits near Japan and China.

Another U.S. move, in coordination of member states, would be to extend the existing program of the “Five Eyes” (the U.S., UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand) arrangement of intelligence sharing, when it pertains to China, to other allies, perhaps initially India and Japan. The U.S. and its allies should probably be prepared for an attempt by China to initiate provocative action against one or more of the states in the region. In response, they might dispatch combat vessels to confront aggressors or rescue those who might need rescuing.

If China should respond to allied containment activities in a more robust military fashion, the massive naval and air power of the U.S. 7th Fleet, based in Yokouska, Japan, should be sufficient to check any aggressive Chinese moves. The 7th Fleet could also be substantially reinforced by U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, headquartered in Hawaii. Any decision by the U.S. to adopt the military containment of China as a policy must assume that China might retaliate. China’s leaders are surely hoping that the current U.S. administration’s aversion to war will enable the Communists to pick off new territory with relative ease; the U.S. should not even let them think of such a possibility.

Spokespersons for member states should not hesitate to declare that it is the mandatory duty of free states to oppose the universal ambitions of the totalitarian Party-State of the People’s Republic of China and its aim eclipsing the United States. This goal is made abundantly clear in their own publications, such as the May 19, 2019 Chinese Communist Party official organ, People’s Daily and the Xinhua News Agency declaring “People’s War” on America. The Party’s narrative is that the U.S. administration is threatening all the people of China. One Chinese state CCTV anchor added that the “U.S. fights for greed and arrogance,” but that “China will fight for a new world.” It certainly will — if we let it.

How “Diverse”: Shoes Thrown at RCMP in Surrey

Posted on by

How “Diverse”: Shoes Thrown at RCMP in Surrey

The joys of “diversity”. It is noteworthy that not only is Newton, Surrey 58% South Asian but throwing shoes at people is a public act of disgust. BC has undergone truly massive demographic change, as a result of immigration.

Putting Canadians Last: Homeless Shelters for Illegals, Not Canadians

Posted on by
True North

Breaking Canadian News and Opinion

stories

GORDON: Homeless Toronto men not offered hotel rooms like illegal border crossers

Refugee claimants are staying in four hotels and an undisclosed number of motels for upwards of six months

by True North Wire

Three men staying at a 24-hour homeless shelter in downtown Toronto told True North they were not offered hotel or motel rooms to live in like the many refugee claimants who illegally entered Canada have been provided by the City.

“There were [some] Nigerians. And they got hooked up with housing pretty quickly,” says a 28-year-old man from Whitby who has been in the shelter system for the last 12 months. The past couple months he has been staying at Fred Victor, a temporary homeless shelter located at 545 Lake Shore Blvd West and known for the majority of its occupants being drug addicts.

“The showers are dirty, the washrooms are dirty. There are needles everywhere,” says the 28-year-old man.

He also said if he had a few months to live in a hotel room he believes he would be able to get his life together, but is finding it difficult living surrounded by drug addicts (he is not one himself).

True North has previously reported that refugee claimants are staying in four hotels and an undisclosed number of motels for upwards of six months at a time.

The amenities at some of these hotels include WiFi, personal TVs, cleaning services, food allowance, etc, far better than the one TV and telephone, as well as extremely slow WiFi, available to those staying at Fred Victor.  

“Every other night there’s a fight going on at three in the morning or there’s an OD or something like that. … A guy died here the other night, people die here. It’s traumatic, for sure,” says the young man from Whitby.

In contrast, a Syrian man illegally entering Canada recently and staying at hotel in downtown Toronto the past months said it was “five star” accommodations compared to living in America the past four years.

The Whitby man says the social workers in charge of helping them find permanent housing “aren’t as engaged” in actively finding places for homeless people at certain facilities compared to others.   

Last week, City of Toronto chief communications officer Brad Ross told True North there is no preferential treatment given to certain homeless people within the system.

“Hotel, respite or shelter all provide different services — they are not positioned along a continuum from ‘better’ to ‘worse’. The City works with each individual client to identify and respond to their specific needs — including the right facility, e.g. hotels work much better for families who can all live together on the same room, while respite tend to accommodate people with more dynamic schedules, as the curfew requirements are unique to that program.”       

A Canadian man originally from Tanzania living in the shelter system the last five months and staying at Fred Victor also says the majority of his fellow occupants are drug addicts openly using inside the facility despite the rules forbidding it.

“Damn right, damn right,” he says laughingly when asked if he would rather live in hotel room. “Have you ever been here at all? It’s just an open area [with beds].”

“I think the [City’s] rationale is that somebody who is new doesn’t know where to go, doesn’t have any way to know anything… They tend to get better facilities than Canadians.”  

With the influx of thousands of asylum seekers into the Toronto shelter system over the past two years, the city has spent tens of millions of dollars in additional funding to add thousands of additional beds.

However, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration general manager Paul Raftis still warned City officials the shelter system is in “immediate danger of being overwhelmed.”

A 26-year-old man, addicted to crystal meth and fentanyl, was turned away from Fred Victor on Saturday night.

“Oh yeah, sometimes I’m out in the cold… All night man.”

On the same street as Fred Victor, but on the east end a couple blocks away from the Distillery District, up to 100 homeless people are staying in one of three tented structures costing $2.5 million each.

Two of the prefabricated structures opened at the end of January, including the one next to the Gardiner which is an empty lot of land closed off to the public by a locked gate and barbed-wire fencing.

Check out our newest product – The True North Field Report

Listen on iTunes


Listen on Spotify


Listen on Soundcloud

We’re asking readers, like you, to make a contribution in support of True North’s fact-based, independent journalism.

Unlike the mainstream media, True North isn’t getting a government bailout. Instead, we depend on the generosity of Canadians like you.

How can a media outlet be trusted to remain neutral and fair if they’re beneficiaries of a government handout? We don’t think they can.

This is why independent media in Canada is more important than ever. If you’re able, please make a tax-deductible donation to True North today. Thank you so much.

The White Inferiority Complex

Posted on by

Throne, Altar, Liberty

The Canadian Red Ensign

The Canadian Red Ensign

Friday, September 18, 2020

The White Inferiority Complex

For decades, hurling the epithet “racist” was the liberal’s go-to method of acknowledging anyone who disagreed with him from a standpoint somewhere to his right. In this same period this method served its purpose of discouraging disagreement with progressive liberalism well. Those who belonged to the mainstream of whatever was considered to be conservatism at the time, which was generally what had been considered liberalism a decade or so earlier, were, for some reason that has never really been explained, particularly sensitive to this accusation, and every time the liberal used this dreaded word they would rush to be the first to throw whoever was on the receiving end of the accusation under the bus. 
Eventually, however, this word lost most of its bite. It had simply been used too often and against too many people. When everyone is a racist, nobody is a racist, and people stop caring when you call somebody a racist. While it made something of a comeback this year, when used with the modifier “systemic”, for a few years now it has been largely replaced in liberal usage with “white supremacist.”


By trading the worn out “racist” for the fresh “white supremacist”, liberals exchanged an insult that had lost most of its meaning through overuse for one that was more powerful than the original had ever been, but in doing so they made themselves look absurd. For one thing white supremacist has a much narrower range of meaning than racist, with connotations of ideology, zeal, commitment, and activism that the word racist does not. There are very few actual white supremacists left and when liberals try to use this expression in the way they used to use racist they invite ridicule upon themselves. 


There is another aspect to the absurdity of the charge of white supremacism being flung around like so much monkey excrement. It is quite evident to anybody with open eyes that if any sort of bad racial thought presently infests the minds of the white people of Western Civilization it is not a sense of superiority over others, much less a feeling of supremacy over others, but rather a sort of inferiority complex. 
What other explanation can there be for the fact that even though the United States, after its Supreme Court abolished all de jure discrimination against blacks, established de jure discrimination against whites in 1964, and Canada, the United Kingdom, and all other Western countries decided to follow this foolish American precedent, and for over a generation anti-white discrimination has been the only established racism in Western Civilization, nevertheless white people have been willing to affirm the proposition that Western countries are “white supremacist” and that they therefore enjoy “privilege” on the basis of their skin colour? 
How else do we explain all the white people who are enthusiastic supporters of Black Lives Matter? BLM, despite the organization’s innocuous if also truistic and banal name, is not about a positive agenda of promoting the security and well-being of black people. Abortion rates have been disproportionately high among black people for decades, but BLM couldn’t care less about all the black lives lost to abortion. They are, in fact, allied to the pro-abortion, feminist cause. Nor does BLM care about all the black lives taken by black perpetrators of violent crime. Blacks are overrepresented among both the perpetrators and the victims of violent crime in general, which has been the case for as long as statistics have been kept about this sort of thing and shows no sign of ceasing to be the case any time soon, and this overrepresentation is even larger for homicide. The inevitable and natural corollary of this is that blacks are also overrepresented among crime suspects, arrests, convictions, and incarcerations. The black lives lost to black crime are not black lives that matter to BLM. BLM cares only about blaming the overrepresentation of blacks among suspects, arrests, etc., on the racism of white police. For this is what BLM is truly about – spreading hatred of police officers, Western Civilization in general but with a focus on the United States, and especially of white people. 


It makes about as much sense, therefore, for white people to support BLM as it would for black people to go around wearing white robes with pointy hoods. Yet this year, in which BLM has, ahem, removed its mask and revealed its true colours like never before, it would have been difficult not to notice the prominent participation of whites in the record-breaking wave of race riots and the “Year Zero” Cultural Maoist assault on historical monuments and statues. That is even without taking into account the lionizers of BLM and its cause among white newspaper and television commentators, white university professors, white clergymen, white corporate executives, white celebrities, and white politicians. 


There is a name for this sort of inferiority complex. It is called liberalism. While there are many different liberalisms with many different meanings, the one that I have in mind here is that of the liberal whom Robert Frost defined as “a man too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel.” Although I must say that when the poet penned that worthy diagnosis it probably never occurred to him that the disease would progress to the point where those infected actively take up arms against their own side. 
This, however, is the stage of the condition in which we find ourselves today and it may very well prove to be the terminal stage. 


Today, whether they seriously believe it to be true or not, a sizeable portion of whites are willing to affirm that racism is a moral offence for which light-skinned people of European ancestry bear a unique guilt, that they are guilty of it even if they are not conscious of having thought a racist thought, said a racist word, or committed a racist act, that this unconscious racism supposedly built into the very fabric of society is worse than the overt racial hatred that is often directed against whites by blacks and others with an anti-white axe to grind, and that it is their moral duty, therefore, to express contrition or shame whenever any non-white person chooses to take offence at something they have said or done or merely the fact that they are living and breathing, and to ignore or excuse explicit expressions of racial animus directed against them, even when these are violent in tone. 
Western liberalism has clearly undergone a mutation from when its humanitarian and universalist ideals merely generated a blindness to the legitimate particular interests of Western nations and peoples. It now actively opposes those interests. 


Think about the implications of the ubiquitous calls to end “systemic racism.” Many, perhaps most, white people have been jumping on board this bandwagon. Perhaps they do not understand that “systemic racism” is a technical term, from neo-Marxist Critical Race Theory, and that it designates this idea of an embedded racism which all white people and only white people are guilty of whether they are conscious of racist thought and actions or not. Perhaps they think it means institutional policies and practices that explicitly discriminate on racial grounds. If the latter is what they think, however, then they are mistaken if they think that racism of this sort, other than the kind that is directed against them, exists in Western countries today. This crusade against “systemic racism” in the Critical Race Theory sense of the term can only have the result, if successful, of making the explicit discrimination against white people that has been institutionalized in all Western countries since the ‘60’s and ‘70s of the last century, worse. 


There is a far worse manifestation of this mutant strain of the liberalism virus. Taken together, a number of liberal policies that have been in place in most if not all Western countries for over four decades, constitute an existential threat to white people. One of these policies is the use of large scale immigration from non-Western countries to offset the declining fertility that has been produced by, among other factors, the anti-natalism of social liberalism’s pro-contraception, pro-abortion, views. The result of this policy having been in place for decades has been the massive demographic transformation of Western societies to the point where in several countries that in living memory were almost entirely white, whites are on the verge of dropping to minority status. When you add to this the introduction in the same time frame of the aforementioned anti-white institutional discrimination, and the vilification of whites in the news media, popular education, and the revisionist educational curriculum, what you end up with is a recipe for a sort of self-inflicted genocide. Indeed, for decades now, Critical Race Theorists such as the late Noel Ignatiev have couched their anti-white ideas in explicitly genocidal language such as “the abolition of the white race”. When called out over this they have defended their rhetoric by saying that the “white race” they are talking about is a social construct, but their arguments have a rather hollow ring to them when we consider that these people would be the first to cry genocide if the same language were used about any other race and that the activist movement that has been built upon the foundation of their theory has translated such rhetoric into even cruder terms and actions that are not so easily explained away. These same people insist that “it is okay to be white” is a dangerous and offensive racist slogan. 


Yet despite all of this, liberalism has been largely successful at convincing a large segment of the white population to regard anyone who dares to speak out against this suicidal combination of policies as being a bigger and more real threat than that combination itself. Indeed, there are several liberal organizations in North America that do nothing else except identify those who speak out against white liberalism’s racial suicide pact and wage a campaign of character assassination against them. 


Liberalism is usually wrong about everything and it is certainly wrong about this. The West does not have a “white supremacist” problem in this day and age. What it is suffering from is rather that many, perhaps most, white people have become infected with a sick-minded racial inferiority complex in which they regard their skin colour as a badge of racial guilt which can only be atoned for through racial suicide. You will be waiting a long time, however, for liberals to acknowledge this. That would mean admitting that liberalism is the problem. Liberals would sooner demonize all those who share their own skin colour than admit that liberalism could be wrong. Posted by Gerry T. Neal at 6:15 AM Labels: abortion, antiracism, Black Lives Matter, contraception, Critical Theory, feminism, immigration, liberalism, Noel Ignatiev, racism, systemic racism, Year Zero

People’s Party Vows to End Trudeau’s Divisive Race Policies & Anti-White Quarter-Billion Dollars for Black Businesses

Posted on by

People’s Party Vows to End Trudeau’s Divisive Race Policies & Anti-White Quarter-Billion Dollars for Black Businesses

The Trudeau government announced last week a $221M business loan program for Black entrepreneurs.

What is this if not systemic racism?!

Systemic, or institutional racism is a form of racism that is embedded as normal practice within society or an organization.

That’s exactly what this kind of program does.

It explicitly favours people belonging to one group and discriminates against others.

How will this program be administered?

Many Canadians have a mixed racial background. Will applicants have to be tested for the darkness of their skin or the percentage of black genes they have?

Will the government also create loan programs for every other racial minority.

It’s completely absurd to divide us along racial lines.

We are all Canadian.

Positive discrimination is discrimination.

Reverse racism is racism.

You cannot redress injustices for minorities that were discriminated in the past by creating new forms of discrimination that will further divide us.

The only way to prevent racism and discrimination is to ensure equal rights and freedoms for all.

A People’s Party government will abolish all these programs that divide Canadians.

The Liberal cult of diversity has to end.

We must emphasize what unites us, not what divides us.

If you oppose these racial and racist policies of the Trudeau government, please help us fight them with a $2 donation today.

Many thanks,
-Max


PS: I thank you if you recently donated. You can still help us by following the PPC on social media (see links below) and by sharing our content with your friends. Or by inviting them to subscribe to our free newsletter.

Share

________________________
People’s Party of Canada
Follow the PPC on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube.
To make a donation with a cheque, please use this address: 15 Boulevard Montclair – PO Box 30019 BP Montclair – Gatineau (QC) Canada J8Y 2E2. The cheque must be made payable to People’s Party of Canada. To make an online donation, please visit our website: www.peoplespartyofcanada.ca. Thank you!
This email was sent to paul@paulfromm.com. To stop receiving emails, click here.
Vous voulez plutôt recevoir nos messages en français? SVP envoyer un courriel à messages@partipopulaireducanada.ca en écrivant « Français » dans l’objet.

CBC’s Chang Continues His Attack On Canada

Posted on by

CBC’s Chang Continues His Attack On Canada

by Dan Murray, Immigration Watch – September 11, 2020http://immigrationwatchcanada.org/ Andrew Chang, one of the CBC’s hosts on its flagship program, The National, has lately been gleefully accusing Canada’s European-based population of so-called “systemic racism”. 

andrew change cbc.jpg

Since he has no qualms about biting the hands that feed him, let’s bite back. Chang is one of two male hosts on “The National”. He is ethnic Chinese. His male host counterpart is East Indian Ian Hanomansing. Their main and only qualification for the job as hosts of The National, is the race each belongs to. Like most journalists in Canada, they are mediocre. In fact, like journalists in mainstream media, both are compliant parrots. Let’s be blunt: In replacing the former host, Peter Mansbridge, CBC administrators chose Chang and Hanomansing in order to stick Chang’s Chinese face and Hanomansing’s East Indian face into the collective face of Canada.

According to CBC reasoning, Canada’s majority population might be able to flee in revulsion from close physical contact with a huge number of unnecessary immigrants. However, Canada’s majority population would find it difficult to flee if the CBC message and its messengers like Chang and Hanomansing were dumped into the television sets in the living rooms of Canadians. A few months ago, Chang took particular delight in piling abuse on the head of Calgary Flames Head Coach Bill Peters. Peters had supposedly used the “N” word twice against one of the players he had coached several years ago. Let us repeat: Peters sinned twice. Since Chang apparently thinks he is superior to people like Peters, let’s see how many times he has used similar words.  Let’s do that by asking Chang, who has Cantonese/Mandarin speaking parents, how many times he has used words similar to the “N” word. For example, let’s take the Cantonese word “Gwailo ” or its Mandarin equivalent. It is almost certain that even if his parents did not use this word, that he almost certainly heard it in the Chinese contacts he grew up with and used it himself to show contempt for Canadians of European background. The word means “foreigner”, “outsider” or in some cases “barbarian”. It implies that people of such background are inferior. Simultaneously, it implies that the Chinese think they are superior.

So, Chang, how about it? How many times? It definitely won’t be twice. Realistically, he has probably used it hundreds, if not thousands of times. So how about punishing Chang in the same way he wanted Peters to be punished. Remember this: For using the “N” word twice, Peters lost his job. So, at the very least, in the interest of fairness, CBC executives should kick Chang out of his job. And don’t stop with that word. How about the Cantonese words “Cha” or Acha” and its Mandarin equivalents? Many Chinese will squirm when asked to define these words because the true definitions will present the Chinese in a very negative light. In fact, when combined with words that the Chinese have for many other ethnic groups, the definitions will make China look like the world’s truly “systemically racist”country

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Western_sentiment_in_China See examples of Chinese slurs against other groups :  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_issues_in_China#Ethnic_slurs 

meaning of “Cha” and “acha” ranges from “bad” or “worst’ to “sand nigger”. The Chinese reserve those words for East Indians. And when the Chinese use those words, the Chinese imply that East Indians are not only inferior. They are the “worst” of all the races. By implication, of course, the Chinese are saying that they are the best or, at the least, infinitely superior. So, Andrew Chang, how many times have you used those words to refer to East Indians. In fact, what did you really think when you first looked at Brown Face Hanomansing? And please, don’t tell us you said those words just once or twice. Your racism runs deep and you know it.  Again, let’s not stop there!! The ultimate goal of Canada’s quisling CBC and “Chinese First” Chang is to see that Canada’s European-based population is relegated to the position of a minority by mass immigration to Canada. It is clear that Chang would love Canada to be mostly Chinese. There is no question that the “systemically putrid” CBC would love to annihilate traditional Canada. The ultimate and hoped-for result that many Canadians have for the CBC is that Canada will annihilate the CBC. Chang lives in a glass house. Yet he sees no problem throwing stones. Much more could be said. We’ll end there for now. 

Police Should Focus on Social Catastrophes, Not Trivialities Such as Use of the Word ‘Chink’

Posted on by

Police Should Focus on Social Catastrophes, Not Trivialities Such as Use of the Word ‘Chink’

Dan Murray, Immigration Watch Canada – August 27, 2020http://immigrationwatchcanada.org/2020/08/27/police-should-focus-on-social-catastrophes-not-trivialities-such-as-use-of-the-word-chink/ Immigration Watch Canada sent the following letter to the Vancouver Police Department. Other police departments in Canada should take very careful note. The Vancouver Police Department has severely blundered.


Staff Sargent Dale Weidman,Vancouver Police Department: On August 19, in response to a CBC interview you did on so-called “HATE SPEECH”, we sent an e-mail to you. In our e-mail, we asked you to tell us the number and nature of recent complaints the VPD had received about so-called “Hate Crimes” in Vancouver. In your reply, you mentioned that you would not tell us the number and nature of the complaints that Asians were making because you had to abide by “Privacy” laws. No offence, but that sounds like a typical bureaucratic weak excuse. Here’s the important question for you to answer : What is so “private” about the number of complaints? Second, what is so “private” about what happened in a sample of the so-called “hate” incidents that occurred? We were not asking you to give us names of victims or perpetrators or the location of the incidents. We were just looking for a rough idea of what happened in a few incidents so that we could determine  the seriousness of the incidents. For example, were most of the complaints mere incidents in which Chinese were called “CHINKS” “? Again, what’s so private about that? Remember something: Most Cantonese refer to people of European origin as: “GWY LO” meaning “barbarian”, that is “a person inferior to Chinese”. Mandarin speakers have a similar word. To coin a phrase, “Put that into your pipe and smoke it !” Here is a big problem you have to deal with: Many White People (maybe including you and other Vancouver Police officers) have been brain-washed into thinking that they can achieve “HERO” status by championing the cause of so-called Chinese “victims”. Our disgraceful CBC/Private media and equally disgraceful politicians have been working tirelessly for years to program Canadians to react that way.

CHINESE.jpg

 Before you go further down that road of thought, please remember that the Chinese in particular (Chinese investor immigrants specifically) are responsible for one of the greatest social catastrophes (namely, Unaffordable Housing) that has happened in Metro Vancouver since Confederation. Immigrant investors from Hong Kong, Taiwan and Mainland China were allowed into Canada principally because they promised to start a business here and employ Canadians. In return, they were given immigrant status for themselves and their dependents. In addition, their dependents received a large number of free social benefits such as free elementary and secondary schooling and cheap university education. However, almost all of the investor immigrants shamelessly did not open businesses. Instead, they speculated on housing and drove hundreds of thousands of Canadians out of home ownership. Worse still, a large number of the investor immigrants were brazen tax evaders from the start and continue as such. In summary, all Canadians have good reason for being indignant about the presence in Vancouver and elsewhere in Canada of these crooks. As for whether the numbers of these crooks are significant, consider this : Several hundred thousand of those Chinese arrived here. I’m not excusing physical violence, but I am saying that Canadians have ample justification for extreme resentment. Our cowardly politicians have done almost nothing to effectively correct this disaster. In fact, almost all of our politicians cower in their basements at the thought of being forced to take action against these crooks or of legislating a major correction (such as a major reduction in immigration intake) which would end this continuing social catastrophe. Consider this : The Vancouver Police Department and other police such as the RCMP might have mitigated this social catastrophe by investigating such activities as Chinese money laundering and real estate speculation. As far as we are aware, the Vancouver Police Department has not instigated any such investigation. Correct us if we are wrong. Disgracefully, you have chomped at the bit to investigate so-called “HATE CRIMES” against “Asians”. Let us repeat, the Vancouver Police Department could have done something to mitigate an ongoing social catastrophe, but instead you have focused on a social triviality. If you would like an example of another very important issue (also immigration-related) that you and other police should have gotten involved in, here is one: The Muslim Brotherhood has entered Canada in large numbers. It has vowed to destroy Western Civilization from within. Yes, I said “destroy”. Doesn’t that sound serious? Shouldn’t such a threat take precedence over investigating a White Canadian for calling a Chinese person a “chink”. The Muslim Brotherhood uses the word “America” to denote the place they want to destroy. However, they have a substantial presence in Canada and apply the same goal here and in all other Western countries. Instead of spending your time trying to present yourself as a hero to Chinese and other Asians, why don’t you and your VPD colleagues do some investigating of the Muslim Brotherhood? I am sure you will uncover something significant to pursue. We can help you to find other information. For details about the Muslim Brotherhood, see this link:https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2010/10/26/fbi-captured-muslim-brotherhoods-strategic-plan/ We hope to hear from you or one of your colleagues soon. Dan Murray,Immigration Watch Canada


For information on Chinese immigrant tax evasion, see http://www.vancouversun.co/news/Douglas+Todd+Thousands+Metro+Vancouver+mansion+owners+avoiding+taxes/11390940/story.htmlhttp://www.scmp.com/comment/blogs/article/1851003/bizarro-vancouver-25000-households-declare-less-income-they-spendhttp://immigrationwatchcanada.org/2016/12/05/11491/

Category: Uncategorized

CBC’s Chang Continues His Attack On Canada.

Posted on by

CBC’s Chang Continues His Attack On Canada

by Dan Murray, Immigration Watch – September 11, 2020http://immigrationwatchcanada.org/ Andrew Chang, one of the CBC’s hosts on its flagship program, The National, has lately been gleefully accusing Canada’s European-based population of so-called “systemic racism”. 

andrew change cbc.jpg

Since he has no qualms about biting the hands that feed him, let’s bite back. Chang is one of two male hosts on “The National”. He is ethnic Chinese. His male host counterpart is East Indian Ian Hanomansing. Their main and only qualification for the job as hosts of The National, is the race each belongs to. Like most journalists in Canada, they are mediocre. In fact, like journalists in mainstream media, both are compliant parrots. Let’s be blunt: In replacing the former host, Peter Mansbridge, CBC administrators chose Chang and Nanomansing in order to stick Chang’s Chinese face and Hanomansing’s East Indian face into the collective face of Canada. According to CBC reasoning, Canada’s majority population might be able to flee in revulsion from close physical contact with a huge number of unnecessary immigrants. However, Canada’s majority population would find it difficult to flee if the CBC message and its messengers like Chang and Hanomansing were dumped into the television sets in the living rooms of Canadians. A few months ago, Chang took particular delight in piling abuse on the head of Calgary Flames Head Coach Bill Peters. Peters had supposedly used the “N” word twice against one of the players he had coached several years ago. Let us repeat: Peters sinned twice. Since Chang apparently thinks he is superior to people like Peters, let’s see how many times he has used similar words.  Let’s do that by asking Chang, who has Cantonese/Mandarin speaking parents, how many times he has used words similar to the “N” word. For example, let’s take the Cantonese word “Gwy Lo” or its Mandarin equivalent. It is almost certain that even if his parents did not use this word, that he almost certainly heard it in the Chinese contacts he grew up with and used it himself to show contempt for Canadians of European background. The word means “foreigner”, “outsider” or in some cases “barbarian”. It implies that people of such background are inferior. Simultaneously, it implies that the Chinese think they are superior. So, Chang, how about it? How many times? It definitely won’t be twice. Realistically, he has probably used it hundreds, if not thousands of times. So how about punishing Chang in the same way he wanted Peters to be punished. Remember this: For using the “N” word twice, Peters lost his job. So, at the very least, in the interest of fairness, CBC executives should kick Chang out of his job. And don’t stop with that word. How about the Cantonese words “Cha” or Acha” and its Mandarin equivalents? Many Chinese will squirm when asked to define these words because the true definitions will present the Chinese in a very negative light. In fact, when combined with words that the Chinese have for many other ethnic groups, the definitions will make China look like the world’s truly “systemically racist”country. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Western_sentiment_in_China See examples of Chinese slurs against other groups :  https://en.wikipedia.org\

/wiki/Ethnic_issues_in_China#Ethnic_slurs The meaning of “Cha” and “acha” ranges from “bad” or “worst’ to “sand nigger”. The Chinese reserve those words for East Indians. And when the Chinese use those words, the Chinese imply that East Indians are not only inferior. They are the “worst” of all the races. By implication, of course, the Chinese are saying that they are the best or, at the least, infinitely superior. So, Andrew Chang, how many times have you used those words to refer to East Indians. In fact, what did you really think when you first looked at Brown Face Hanomansing? And please, don’t tell us you said those words just once or twice. Your racism runs deep and you know it.  Again, let’s not stop there!! The ultimate goal of Canada’s quisling CBC and “Chinese First” Chang is to see that Canada’s European-based population is relegated to the position of a minority by mass immigration to Canada. It is clear that Chang would love Canada to be mostly Chinese. There is no question that the “systemically putrid” CBC would love to annihilate traditional Canada. The ultimate and hoped-for result that many Canadians have for the CBC is that Canada will annihilate the CBC. Chang lives in a glass house. Yet he sees no problem throwing stones. Much more could be said. We’ll end there for now.

Category: Uncategorized | Tags: ,