Tag Archives: replacing founding/settler people. Eric Kaufmann

Trudeau’s 500,000 per year immigration plan should be his Waterloo

Posted on by

A number of Canadians have previously had doubts about openly opposing Trudeau’s relentless immigration intake. But they should not have any doubts now. His latest words should change their minds : Trudeau has just announced an aggressive plan to bring in 500,000 immigrants a year by 2025. 


Let us repeat : Trudeau plans to increase Canada’s immigration intake to 500,000 per year !! And he seems to think that he can get away with this outrageous plan.


His intake has been increasing every year for the past few years. It is already over 400,000. No logical reason has ever been given for such high numbers. The “Aging population” argument was refuted many years ago. The “Worker shortage” argument is probably the latest version of a sick cheap labour plan or an outright lie.


If Canada had journalists who had not been outrageously bought off by Trudeau, Canadians would have the detailed information to dismiss immigration industry arguments.


Trudeau’s 500,000 intake proposal is obviously the worst of all the stupid things he has done. As insane as it sounds, it is clearly more of Trudeau’s overall plan to have immigrants outnumber Canada’s current European-based population and make it a minority.


At the very beginning of Trudeau’s reign in 2015, he revealed his clear anti-Canada mindset. Trying to sound intellectual and capable of the analysis he is obviously incapable of performing, he described Canada as a “post-national state” with no clear identity”. Most Canadians concluded that he was a fool. Many concluded that he was obviously very hostile to Canada and that he intended to undermine and destroy Canada. Since then, he has taken many immigration and other measures to achieve that goal and erase completely the traditional identity of Canada.


The fact is that is that Canada’s European-descended majority population had long ago succeeded in making Canada one of the most successful countries in the world over the past 150 years. In fact, Canada was universally envied for its success.Foreigners wanted to come here to be part of the success. Now, Trudeau is importing huge numbers of immigrants who have actually announced that they are hostile to Canada and want to re-create here the politically corrupt cesspools they came from.


 It is no exaggeration to say that allowing such people into Canada is very dangerous. It is also no exaggeration to say that allowing such people in may ultimately lead to civil war and to a national breakdown.
For his actions, Trudeau at the very least would have been put on trial in most parts of the world. . There is also no doubt that he would have been sentenced to life in prison for treason. In fact, in many other parts of the world, he would have been quickly executed for treason.


For his contempt for Canada and especially its European-based population, Trudeau is already despised by a significant part of Canada’s population. His latest announcement should leave no doubt that he is a shameless and despicable traitor. He has obviously betrayed Canada’s majority population. Strong measures have to be taken to stop him from going any further . In most countries of the world, there are laws against treason. Even Canada has such a law. In fact, in the next few months, Canadian judges will have to sentence a Canadian military officer who has been convicted of treason. His crime was selling Canadian military secrets to Russia. Canadians should pay careful attention to the sentence that judges give to that man.


Why? Trudeau’s crime is infinitely worse : Trudeau is promoting the overwhelming of Canada’s majority population and the sale of Canada to groups that are openly hostile to the very existence of all Canadians.   


Trudeau has to be stopped immediately. The immigration idiocy he has already committed has to be corrected immediately. His latest idiotic announcement has to be withdrawn immediately


If Parliament were doing its job, it would have long ago reined in Trudeau at many points in the past few years. However, not a single MP has objected to any of the immigration actions that Trudeau has performed so far. (Sikh Heritage Month is one of the exceptionally stupid.) If Parliament repeats its behaviour of the past five years, it will not oppose Trudeau’s 500,000 proposal. If that happens,Canadians can justifiably conclude that Canada’s MP’s are a useless collection of deadbeats.


In Many countries, most of them would have been thrown out of the building that housed them. In a significant number of countries, the building and its occupants would have been declared useless, bombed and the wounded traitors left to rot.


Sounds appropriate for this latest mess in Canada, doesn’t it?

Canada replacing its population a case of wilful ignorance, greed, excess political correctness, says former Ambassador Martin Collacutt

Posted on by

Canada replacing its population a case of wilful ignorance, greed, excess political correctness, says former Ambassador Martin Collacutt

Vancouver , B.C.  July 1,  2013 Colourful way to celebrate as thousands take in the  Canada Day parade  in downtown Vancouver on July 1, , 2013.  Here the crowds at Burrard and Georgia wave to the parade performers on Georgia Street.    Mark van Manen/PNG Staff    Vancouver Sun ProvinceNews stories  and WEB stories     Trax    #  00022168A  Vancouver Sun ProvinceNews stories  and WEB stories     Trax    #  00022168A [PNG Merlin Archive]
Canada Day in Vancouver. Commentator Martin Collacott says that while a moderate degree of diversity can make society more vibrant, it’s different when it develops to a state where it overwhelms and largely replaces the existing population. MARK VAN MANEN / PNG

SHAREADJUSTCOMMENTPRINT

According to University of London professor Eric Kaufmann, almost seven out of 10 Vancouver residents will be “visible minorities” within two generations and 80 per cent of the Canadian population (compared to 20 per cent today) will be non-white in less than century.

Kaufmann notes that, with its continuing high immigration intake and the fact that four out of five newcomers are visible minorities, Canada is undergoing the fastest rate of ethnic change of any country in the Western world.

Questions must be asked about why such drastic population replacement is taking place and who is benefiting from it.

While Canada has been helped by large-scale immigration at various times in its history, the current high intake causes more problems than benefits for our current population. Our economy grows because of the increasing population, but the average Canadian gets a smaller piece of the bigger pie. The cost is huge — with latest estimates indicating taxpayers have to underwrite recent arrivals to the tune of around $30 billion annually. Young people in large cities such as Vancouver and Toronto are being crowded out of the housing market by sky-high prices caused largely by the ceaseless flow of new arrivals, and the quality of life of most residents is negatively affected by increased traffic and commute times, along with congestion and pressure on the health care and education systems.

Despite this, those who profit from mass immigration continue to laud its benefits. Their claims are not supported by the facts, however. We are not facing looming labour shortages that we can’t meet with our existing workforce and educational infrastructure. Immigration, moreover, does not provide a realistic means of dealing with the costs associated with the aging of our population.

Those who seek to benefit from continued high immigration include leaders of political parties bent on expanding their political base with policies designed to make it easier to come here from abroad and acquire the full benefits of citizenship. Also active are leaders of immigrant organizations eager to expand their support base and influence. Another important influence has been contributions from developers who want an endless supply of new homebuyers and are major funders of politicians and parties — particularly at the municipal level.

In this regard, it is worth noting that not too long ago, leading politicians in Vancouver on both sides of the political aisle — such as former mayors Art Phillips and Mike Harcourt — were readily prepared to identify high immigration intake as one of the leading causes, if not the main cause, of rising house prices. Now, however, no Canadian politician has the guts or integrity to connect the two.

RELATED

This is not only because they are so heavily indebted to the real estate industry in one way or another, but also since criticism of mass immigration is treated in many quarters as xenophobic, if not racist, since newcomers are overwhelmingly visible minorities. While a moderate degree of diversity can make society more vibrant — and my own family is an example of this — it is quite a different matter when it develops to a level where it overwhelms and largely replaces the existing population, particularly when there is no good reason for allowing this to happen.

With current policies, we will have to find room for tens of millions of more newcomers, most of whom will settle in the already densely populated areas of the country where most of the employment opportunities as well as their relatives are located.

We will also have to contend with the fact that many will bring with them values and traditions that may differ in key respects from those of most Canadians, such as gender equality and concern for protection of the environment.

If Canada continues along its present path as described by Kaufmann, we will become one of the first and perhaps the only country in the world to voluntarily allow its population to be largely replaced by people from elsewhere.

Is this what Canadians want for their children and their descendants? Almost certainly not.

And yet we are letting it happen through a combination of wilful ignorance, political and financial greed and an excess of political correctness.

Are we prepared to do something about it? Sadly, it appears that most Canadians are too supine or short-sighted to do so — at least at this juncture.

Canadians deserve a full and informed public debate on the extent to which immigration policy will determine the future of the country. This should form the basis for a sensible public policy based on the long-term interests of the existing population, rather than those of special interest groups. Without this we cannot expect our descendants to inherit a country that is anything like the Canada of today.

Martin Collacott lives in Surrey and served as Canadian ambassador in Asia and the Middle East. He has testified on numerous occasions before parliamentary committees as an expert witness on immigration, refugee and security matters