Tag Archives: Tucker Carlson

The Assisted Suicide of the White Race

Posted on by

The Assisted Suicide of the White Race

It’s not “hate” to object to extinction

Donald Jeffries

Years ago, Howard Stern used to have a Grand Wizard of the KKK on his show as a regular guest. They loved to share his signature, “Wake up, Watt people!” This was when Howard was entertaining. I hate referencing a Grand Wizard of the KKK, but White people really do need to wake up. They’ve been turned into the Walking Dead.

Picture background

If you’ve read my work, you know that I always champion the underdog. I will always be on the side of the weak and the vulnerable. Regardless of color, creed, religion, or gender. I would surely have felt differently during the time of lynching and cross burning. Today, however, the most obvious underdogs are those same Watt people the Grand Wizard tried to awaken in vain. Collectively, we are going extinct. Whites meet every qualification for an endangered species. No one is concerned about that, least of all Watt people. Young White women today are opting out of marriage and childbirth, to such an extent that for the first time in recorded history, more thirty year old females are single rather than married. Corporations are funding special baseball clinics to bring more Blacks back into Major League Baseball. No corporation is funding any program to bring more Whites back into anything. Affirmative Action, DEI, mass self-hatred- the total package. The influence of Whites is disappearing.

The new movie The Odyssey illustrates the woeful state of the formerly White West. Director Christopher Nolan utilized every “Woke” element possible. There are Asian soldiers in this ancient Greece. A real life Black rapper, wearing the dreadlocks that all Greeks of that era were noted for, was cast, as was former cute and plucky actress Ellen Page. Who has transitioned into a very angry and sad little “man” named Elliott Page. He/she/they/them is cast as a warrior. A really small warrior. And Helen of Troy, with such a beautiful face that it could launch a thousand ships, is now a very dark African. Those of us who noticed all this (an astonishing percentage of Whites literally don’t notice it), have been counseled by “Woke” keyboard warriors, that there were Africans in ancient Greece. Yes, and I’m sure they were in leadership roles as well. Launching ships and all that. I’m surprised that they didn’t have the real life rapper rapping onscreen. It’s well known that there were rappers in ancient Greece.

We all know this cultural appropriation only works one way. The simple equation is: less Whites. Whites are being replaced, in the real world, and in the culture. There are countless Black “celebrities” I’ve never heard of. There has to be more famous Black people than White people at this point. Which is hard to happen organically when Blacks are only 12-13 percent of the population. They’ve kind of become a special underclass, disproportionately poor and prone to violent crime, but also featuring a disproportionate number of wealthy athletes, entertainers, and “influencers.” I suffer from Black Fatigue, but I’m especially fatigued with famous Black people I’ve never heard of. Black Fatigue is at the heart of the Great Replacement. I’m Fatigued with endless videos, providing clear cut evidence of the ghetto pathological behavior that is largely unknown in any other racial group. They feel “disrespected.” Well, I feel disrespected, too. Whites as a whole didn’t do anything to warrant being replaced.

Canada, as you may know, has this especially Orwellian law whereby a depressed person can simply call a hotline, and someone from the government will come to their home and suicide them. The kind of ghoulish house calls that doctors stopped making decades ago. If it can be believed, suicide is now the leading cause of death among young Canadians. Talk about a successful government program! This Medically Assisted Dying program has the support of as much as 90 percent of Canadians. This meshes nicely with those who actually use this program being 95.6 percent White. Who, you know, kill themselves. As of 2024, White males in America commit the most suicides, at 26.4 percent, with White females at 6.5 percent. There is also a category for “non-Hispanic Latinos,” which I’m guessing are Whites, at 15.9 percent. So, we seem to be pretty far ahead in the suicide sweepstakes. And judging by the poll numbers, public support for assisted suicide assures even more aborted White lives.

Picture background

Considering the level of self-hatred we see in so many Whites, especially White females, it’s not surprising that many would feel suicidal. After all, if you’re part of this horrific cancer on the overall population, whether you include yourself or not (they rarely do), then I imagine it would be hard to go on. And with an assisted suicide hotline, you don’t need to think about it too much. Just do it, as Nike used to say. Is your chronic pain especially bad today? There’s a solution only a phone call away. Did you just get dumped by someone you loved? Fired from your job? I can relate to artistic types, whose work was just rejected in some particularly nasty way. Someone close to you die? The bereavement process can easily turn suicidal. The possibilities go on and on. Now, if you’re having a bad day, you can make it your last day. With ease and convenience. No messy cleanup for others, from that gunshot to the mouth. No terrifying hanging figure for loved ones to discover. It’s clean, quick, and paid for.

The cultural conditioning we each experience everyday, and have experienced all our lives, is primarily directed at White people. Especially White females. Don’t have children until you can afford them. Or until you’re “ready,” whatever that means. An unexpected pregnancy is an unwanted pregnancy. My body, my choice (except for vaccines). Unless the birth is scrupulously planned, every White pregnancy is cause for worry, not joy. Compare that to the Hispanic community, which largely considers every pregnancy a blessing, regardless of the circumstances. When you cease to value the miracle of birth, you start to dwindle as a population. Whites are dwindling. In 1900, 36 percent of the world’s population was White. Today, it is 8 percent. That would be cause for alarm if we were talking about the White rhino, or the White tiger. But not for the White human being. The dreaded Caucasion. Whites actually cheer when a Jimmy Fallon announces they’ll be a minority soon. Wake up Watt people.

I would feel the same way if any other racial group was on the way towards extinction. I still feel sad over the loss of the Dodo bird. All life is precious. And yet, because of nonstop propaganda doled out to the last several generations, Whites have devolved into largely weak, cucked males, and angry, aggressive females. The hardest thing for young White people to do nowadays is form a romantic relationship. Unless they’re both “transitioned” to some new imaginary gender. In which case, they can’t have biological children. And that’s the goal. The goal of the eugenicists who loom large in this story. Yes, the hand of the non-Irish is front and center, too. How many quotes do we have to read from rabbis about eliminating the White race? I’ve yet to read a quote from a Catholic priest, fantasizing about ridding the world of a particular race or religion. Our leaders are like the distasteful half non-Irish “comedian” Bill Maher, who once proudly proclaimed that he was pro-death. Pro-death of Whites, that is.

No less an establishment source than Bloomberg News reported, in a September 25, 2023 article, that of the 300,000 jobs added by the S & P 100 after the BLM protests, 94 percent went to nonwhites. Just six percent to White workers? And this was announced gleefully by the state controlled media. You know, what pretty much every Black person calls the “racist” media. Run by invisible White Supremacists. Who are so bad at Supremacing that they can’t stop themselves from hiring those they supposedly hate. I find that to be an incomprehensible, frightening statistic. DEI gone wild. But I suspect most Watt people wouldn’t agree. As long as they had jobs, I guess. If you can curtail Whites from reproducing, and don’t hire them for whatever rare employment opportunities are left in this rigged economy, you’re orchestrating a soft genocide. Yes, I know the non-Irish invented that term, and claim ownership of it. They’d undoubtedly condemn me as “anti-Semitic” for saying such a thing. So be it.

Picture background

No one with a large public platform will touch this issue. Tucker Carlson has nibbled around the edges, as have some successful podcasters in our alt media world. But they never go as far as I do. Every White is afraid to grieve for the potential loss of the White race. Why? Can you imagine the Chinese being afraid to address, or even acknowledge, being an endangered species? Species has become yet another controversial word recently. Controversial as in “racist.” WNBA mediocre “influencer” Angel Reese accused a White coach, who comes from Australia, of calling her a “protected species.” Which she most assuredly is. As the hapless coach explained, this is a common term in Australia, and has nothing to do with race. Doesn’t matter. An angry Black complained about something a White said, and the White issued the obligatory apology. As they always do. Apologizing their way towards extinction. Have you ever heard a famous Black apologize to a White person?

Apologizing, like cuckoldry, is a White thing. I think of White people the way Homer Simpson thought of beer, in an early classic Simpsons episode: the cause of, and solution to, all of life’s problems. I’ve certainly spent a lot of time writing about, and talking about, the corruption and criminality of famous White people. Rich, greedy White people. But I don’t think we should be allowed to go extinct. When a species of animal is endangered, zoos forcefully couple them, in an attempt to increase the numbers. If only some zoo would couple young White people, and force them to procreate, we might be able to save the race. Those who look like us. That’s not a bad thing to want to do. I won’t apologize for advocating the preservation of a race that produced Shakespeare, and Michelangelo, and Da Vinci, and Thomas Jefferson. A race responsible for the Enlightenment. For the great inventions like the light bulb and the computer chip. But these accomplishments are scorned, not celebrated.

The 1965 Immigration Reform Act flipped our immigration policy on its ear, as we went from mandating 90 percent of immigrants to be from Europe, to mandating 90 percent come from places other than Europe. A very blatant darkening of the population, which subsequently spread to England, France, Australia, and other majority White nations. Nonwhite migrants and immigrants inserted into White societies. But never nonwhite societies. No migrants for China. Or India. Or Saudi Arabia. Not exactly subtle. It’s so obvious they might as well be hitting you over the head with it. And yet there has been little resistance to what is by any definition a Great Replacement. The protests in Ireland provide a little hope. But the hour is late. There’s a reason London has become Londonistan. Most Whites still won’t admit that this is a problem. For the very survival of their race. And too many approve of it.

How many Whites have been murdered by Black criminals in this country, and now in England and other nations undergoing the joys of diversity? To the near silence of the state controlled media. To such an extent that we are now learning that the police and justice department are rigging the numbers on race and crime. They are literally categorizing obvious Blacks and other nonwhites as “White” on official criminal reports. Look at the photo below. How overt does this agenda have to be? Again, conservatives; the police are not your friends. Despite this rigging of reality, the FBI claims Blacks- at just 12-13 percent of the population- commit some 38 percent of all murders. Some sources list a higher figure. As for interracial crimes, Blacks commit 90 percent of them. Yet in every Hollywood production, the situation is reversed, with evil White criminals, and innocent Black victims. This is the definition of indoctrination. Why do they want you to believe such lies? And the lies are working.

Picture background

I shouldn’t be the one to have to defend the right of White people to exist. Don’t they have the same right to exist that Israel is always telling us they have? And yet, who is defending this right to exist? The Great Replacement extends back into history. Retroactive virtue signaling. If they did ever make that big budget film about the fight for American independence, you know Sally Hemings would be heavily featured. They’d probably have her coming up with key phrases in the Declaration, which Jefferson just culturally appropriated from her. George Washington would have some hip Black aide, who was his real second in command. To advise him and correct him, just like so many magical Black actors do in all those commercials. There would be Asians at Valley Forge. And Hispanics. Perhaps Abigail Adams would have a clandestine lesbian affair. Overall, the Founders would be depicted as racist dunces, fortunate just to have nonwhites and gender fluids there to guide them.

Our society is not now, and never has been color blind. I don’t know if that is even possible. But if you create a society where the majority race is castigated as incompetent yet “supremacist,” and those within it discouraged from even mentioning their skin color unless it is to apologize for it, you’ll eventually wind up on the road to extinction. You can’t have all other groups encouraged to be proud of their skin color, and wildly exaggerate their accomplishments, while forcing the majority race to apologize on cue for things it never did, and expect racial harmony. We are either all free to speak our mind, or no one is. The word “racist” has lost all meaning and become beyond redundant. If you value your ancestors, you’ll want descendants. If you value life, you’ll want to bring new life into the world. All men/women/they/thems are created equal. We all have the same inalienable rights that come from God, not any government. That includes Watt people.

Tucker Carlson is Right About the Genocide of Whites in Canada

Posted on by

Immigration Reformer Peter Brimelow and Tucker Carlson: The Transcript

Posted on by

Brimelow and Carlson: The Transcript

“Thirty years ago William F. Buckley banished Peter Brimelow from Con Inc. for saying that immigration was destroying the country. Turns out Brimelow was right.”

https://singjupost.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Peter-Brimelows-interview-on-The-Tucker-Carlson-Show-January-20-2026.jpg

Peter Brimelow writes: Tucker Carlson’s reach is amazing. This interview was posted at 2:30 p.m. January19 and at 7 p.m. two people came up to me at a meeting I was attending in downtown Berkeley Springs WV to congratulate me.

I’m posting here the lightly-edited transcript with supporting links provided by my long-time VDARE.com lieutenant James Fulford (subscribe to his substack).

P

Thanks to everyone.

Replacing America: Peter Brimelow on the Invasion of America, Who’s Behind It, and How Long Until Total Collapse

TC: Peter Brimelow, thank you so much for doing this. I thought of you last week when I read this. I don’t know how much you follow X, but there were a couple exchanges that suggested to me that things are changing very, very fast.

This is a tweet less than a week ago from a basically anonymous account and I’m quoting: “If white men become a minority, we will be slaughtered. Remember, if non-whites openly hate white men, while white men hold a collective majority. Then they will be a thousand times more hostile and cruel when there are a majority over whites. White solidarity is the only way to survive.”

Elon Musk retweets it and says “100 percent .” And then Elon Musk writes this: “If current trends continue whites will go from being a small minority of the world population today to virtually extinct!”

All of that, in my opinion, is obviously true, and I think most people know it.

But I read that and I thought, here’s the world’s richest man, who owns this platform and a lot of other things, saying this. And Peter Brimelow, whom I know, who’s a thoroughly decent person, has had his life turned upside down and basically been destroyed in some ways, professionally anyway, for saying things that are way more restrained for than that.

So I have to ask you what it feels like to see that.

PB: It feels kind of tingly!

TC: Tingly?!

PB: On the one hand, I’m happy that the debate has moved in that direction and the things that we were talking about 25 years ago on VDARE.com, which was my website, about Birthright Citizenship and so on, are now in the public debate.

On the other hand, we’ve been ruined, and we’re now facing personal ruin of course, because of this attack on us by New York Attorney General Letitia James.

As nobody knows who I am Tucker, I should say that, in spite of my accent, I’ve been here for 55 years and I’m a long-time financial journalist. I worked for Forbes and Fortune and Barron’s and so on.

And I wrote for National Review a lot. I wrote a cover story on immigration in 1992, “ Time To Rethink Immigration,” that’s sometimes credited with kicking off the modern debate.

And there was a brief civil war within the Conservative Movement, which we lost. Buckley stabbed us in the back and purged the magazine of immigration patriots.

And for the next while, the Wall Street Journal Editorial Pagewas absolutely dominant, they were going on about the need for Amnesty and so on, and there was no way to combat it.

So I set up a website, which I named VDare.com after Virginia Dare, the first English child—not white child as they always say— born in the New World. And over a period of about 25 years, we built it up into quite a force until about two years ago it was destroyed by the New York Attorney General, Letitia James. She just basically subpoenaed us to death. And she has in fact now sued us both personally and through the foundation.

So we’re a bit like General Flynn, you know. No middle class family can stand up to this. General Flynn had to sell his house and we’re going to be driven into personal bankruptcy, I guess.

TC: It’s a horrifying story. I’ve kept abreast of it through your wife who texts me and is a wonderful person. And I know that you’re a man of great personal decency and restraint and basically a great citizen and the kind of immigrant we need, and I’m grateful to have.

So the whole thing is shocking and so revealing.

But I’d like, if you don’t mind, to start closer to the beginning of this story, with your experience at National Review. You said you wrote this piece saying Time To Rethink Immigration, which I remember well.

At the time, National Review really was a forum for conservatives to think through what it meant to be conservative. So that was a significant piece at the time. And then you said the then editor William F. Buckley Jr., stabbed you in the back. Can you tell the story?

PB: Sure. I was never on staff at National Review, I was what they called a Senior Editor, and I wrote for it a lot. In 1992, I wrote this very long cover story, it’s about 14,000 words. Bill had retired as the Editor by then, he was just circling around in the background, but the then-editor, John O’Sullivan, went with this story.

And for about five years, we basically directly challenged the official Conservatism Inc. line, which was that immigration is good, more immigration is better, illegal immigration is very good. That’s what the Wall Street Journal said, and is still saying as far as I can tell.

Then in 1997, Bill just abruptly, without any warning at all, fired O’Sullivan and purged the magazine of immigration patriots and basically told them to shut up about immigration, which of course they all eagerly did. He put the Washington Bureau in charge, Rich Lowry and Ramesh Ponnuru.

And so for two or three years you couldn’t get even the basic facts about immigration out to the public. But then the internet came along and rescued us. And I started VDARE.com.

TC: But why do you think Bill Buckley, who was retired and letting John O’Sullivan run it (another Brit—

PB: Yes, indeed.

TC: —who now is in Budapest) stepped back in to shut down that conversation specifically?

PB: Of course, I’ve had nearly 30 years to think about that. Over time, my answer’s evolved.. At the time I thought he was just jealous. This is actually a thing that you see–I was a financial journalist for a long time—in the corporate world. The original entrepreneurs will come back and fire the managers that they put in to replace themselves.

Also, I think the Congressional Republicans hated us talking about immigration because it upsets the donors, That was influential with Bill. He liked being lionized by the then-Republican majority in the House.

TC: So the Republican leadership, Newt Gingrich, etc., who came in in 1994 to much fanfare, achieved not a lot, they’re the ones who pressured Bill Buckley?

PB: I think that was true, but I also think that the Neoconservatives in New York hated the line. And Bill was very, very leery of offending the Neocons, people like [Commentary Magazine Editor] Norman Podhoretz. And I think they pressured him—I mean, I know they pressured—to get rid of John.

TC: Now, why would they care?

PB: Oh, because the Neoconservatives were a predominantly Jewish faction. They had this sort of Ellis Island view of America. And they were extremely frightened of the white majority in America becoming self-conscious because they felt as Jews that it might leave them out in the cold.

TC: Despite the fact there’s never been any real anti-Semitic movement in the United States—there’s no evidence that white people becoming aware of the fact that they’re white is a threat to Jews?

PB: Right

And I actually think there was a certain jealousy there. If you look at ideas on the Right in recent years, a lot of them originated out of neoconservatism. But here was a non-neoconservative faction—we would have then described ourselves as paleoconservatives—coming up with a whole new issue .

Because the immigration issue was completely dormant from 1968 when Hart-Celler kicked in, until the early 1990s. There was no discussion of it at all. I actually went through National Review’s archives and I found that they hadn’t discussed immigration between the passage of the 1965 Act until the early 1990s. People simply didn’t realize what was going on.

TC: Why?

PB: I think there are a couple of reasons. One is that there was a pause in immigration from 1924 to about 1968. So a whole generation grew up when there was essentially no immigration at all into the U.S. And so it just wasn’t an issue to them.

It’s like academic life. Where there’s a new academic theory. It’s not that it conquers the other theories by having better arguments. It’s just that the people who hold the earlier theories die off, and they’re replaced by younger academics.

And that’s true for politicians too. A whole generation of politicians had never thought about this issue. I include Ronald Reagan in that. Immigration simply wasn’t an issue when he was growing up.

And that’s why he was hornswoggled by the IRCA Amnesty in 1986. He genuinely thought that the permanent government would exchange Amnesty for serious enforcement. Whereas in fact they just took the Amnesty and didn’t enforce the law against illegal immigration at all.

TC: But I’m a little bit fixated on William Buckley because he was such a dominant force.

PB: Let me just back up a second. Looking at National Review now, it’s obviously donor-driven. And we weren’t aware of that in the 1990s. I didn’t think about donors and their role in politics really until some years later than that. We thought that people just got up and argued about issues. We just simply didn’t realize how dominant and how important the donors are.

Particularly given that Bill was not as wealthy as he wanted people to think. He depended on National Review financially. It financed his lifestyle to a considerably extent. And I think that—

TC: Wait, he depended on the magazine?

PB: Yeah, yeah—

TC: I think the rest of us thought the magazine depended upon him.

PB: That’s what he wanted you to think!

TC: And the winters in Gstaad and the sailing across the Atlantic, the Bermuda race and-

PB: I don’t know how much, but there was certainly quite a lot that was deducted or expensed to the magazine.

In any case, he just didn’t want to disrupt the donor flow. The more I think about it, the more I think that probably was the reason.

TC: Basically a species of fraud. I don’t mean against the tax code. I mean intellectual fraud. You’re making the case that you believe these things because they are true, when in fact you’re taking money to say them.

PB: My experience with Bill is that he actually was not very interested in politics. When you went to those dinners he used to put on at [the Buckley NY pied a terre] 73 East 73rd Street, it was very hard to get him to talk about politics. He was always wandering off in odd directions. And you can see that in the way he lived his life, latterly, in writing these silly novels and so on. He basically didn’t do any serious thinking about politics.

I have a letter from him, actually, saying how wonderful my immigration story was. I forget exactly what he said, but he said it was beautifully organized and beautifully argued and the tone was perfect. That sort of stuff.

He never admitted that he changed his mind on immigration. He just told them to stop covering it. The official line of the magazine was that immigration was questionable. They just didn’t do any journalism on it.

Which is how he was about drug legalization. He was officially in favor of drug legalization, but he very rarely let the magazine write about it.

TC: Huh!Why?

PB: I guess he was balancing a number of issues.

In the case of immigration—immigration was a very unfashionable subject in the early 1990s…

TC: I remember!

PB: As we were talking earlier, I was watching Ben Shapiro on Megyn Kelly. And he was attacking you for some reason or other, I forget what. And then he suddenly says, well, ““Tucker has been a wonderful advocate in the past, particularly on the immigration issue.”

Well, as I understand it, you’re interested in the idea of an immigration moratorium.

TC: Of course.

Well, this is news to me!—that’s what Ben Shapiro thinks is good about your views on immigration! Just about five or six years ago, in National Review, he called me a White Supremacist basically for no other reason than advocating immigration reduction.

In those days, if you advocated immigration control, you were immediately suspected of being an anti-Semite—even though there’s no direct connection at all.

And now they’ve changed their mind on this, they’ve fallen back. I was very friendly with Norman Podhoretz—he didn’t talk to me for the last 10 years of his life, he died just a few weeks ago, at the age of 95—and just before he’d died gave an interview in which he said he’d changed his mind on immigration! He thought there was a limit to how much immigration could be absorbed!

And he credited John O’Sullivan, the Editor of National Review, for helping change his mind. He didn’t mention me!

TC: Why didn’t he speak to you for the last 10 years of his life?

PB: Well, I think he just decided that I was a suspicious character. And I had deviated on the immigration issue.

I had the habit of calling the National Review, the Goldberg Review, because at that stage, briefly, it was dominated by Jonah Goldberg, who I think is a complete fraud and lightweight, and of course was absolutely boneheaded on the immigration issue.

TC: He’s certainly a lightweight. It’s hard to know what he believes or doesn’t, but if Jonah Goldberg is your intellectual force, then you’ve been degraded.

PB: Well, Norman emailed me and said you’ve got to stop calling National Review the Goldberg Review because it sounds anti-Semitic.

Actually, my understanding is that Goldberg is not technically Jewish. His mother was a Gentile.

TC: I knew her. She was a great person, actually.

PB: So I replied and said that. And he didn’t get back to me. He just gradually suspected me more and more of Thought Crime.

And Norman was an extremely passionate man—

TC: [Laughing] Oh, so famously!

PB: He didn’t socialize with opponents.

I miss him. I really liked him. I was sorry that….

TC: There was a lot about him that was appealing. He was a man of great energy, and I admired him in a lot of ways, kind of repulsive in others, but certainly he was not standing still. He was constantly in motion and I admire that.

PB: And we actually owe his wife Midge Decter a lot because she was the Chairthing of the Philadelphia Society, which is a conservative affinity group, and she invited me to speak on immigration in 2005. My first wife had just died, and that’s where I met my current wife, Lydia, who of course ran the VDARE Foundation with me, she was the publisher of VDARE.com. And you’ve had her on of course.

Tucker Carlson Visits Hungary, A Country that Protects Its Borders, & The Fake News Media Go Crazy

Posted on by

Tucker Carlson Visits Hungary. Apoplectic Rage on the Left

August 7, 2021/6 Comments/in Featured Articles /by Kevin MacDonald

Liberals and leftists are absolutely apoplectic about Tucker Carlson’s week-long visit to Hungary. His shows featured views of the border as well-fenced (built after the 2015 attempted invasion) and peaceful, with migrants from Serbia being turned back—a far cry from Biden’s unofficial policy of welcoming migrants and putting them on planes and buses to be sent around the country to dilute any remaining places that are seen as too White, with the assumption that they will eventually vote Democrat when they get amnestied or they change the voting laws. (The NYTimes recently published an op-ed arguing there is no good reason why illegals can’t vote, so it’s definitely on the left’s wish list.)

On Monday Carlson opened his show with this:

If you care about Western civilization and democracy and families, and the ferocious assault on all three of those things by the leaders of our global institutions, you should know what is happening here right now.

That quote appeared in an article in The Daily Beast where the author, Jared Yates Sexton, couldn’t resist referring to “so-called ‘Western Civilization.’” You definitely know where that train of thought is going.

Here’s most of the show from last night.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=KwENbteI5U0%3Fwmode%3Dopaque%26rel%3D0

At the beginning there is a clip from an interview with Victor Orbán who reasserts the right of Hungary to decide who comes into their country, and that they have a right to decide on their culture. If they want a family-friendly culture and oppose LGBT+ propaganda and Critical Race Theory in their schools, they should be able to do that. If they would rather not have a post-Christian society or a Muslim counter-culture, it’s their right. Their culture is up to them, not globalist elites residing in Brussels or Washington dictating what they must do. And that’s what they have done.

Mr. Orban’s party recently adopted a law restricting depictions of homosexuality; critics said it was being used to target the country’s L.G.B.T.Q. community. And the government-aligned media regularly rails against the destabilizing effect that Western “woke” culture has on traditional society. (Benjamin Novak & Michael M. Grynbaum in the NYTimes)

One can only imagine the horror at such things among our ruling class. “Authoritarian!” they’ll say—while happily mandating their own totalitarian ideology in America.

As Orbán notes, the globalists basically want to force other societies to be multicultural—to admit Muslim communities, for example—in the belief that these disparate groups will get along just fine. But, he says, it’s “obviously risky.” So true. Multiculturalism is a utopian ideology, and what evidence we have thus far is not encouraging—even apart from the argument from ethnic genetic interests. As Orbán says, Germany has gotten what it deserved for bringing in millions of Muslims. Now Europe has no-go zones and organized crime by family-based cartels. You can import people out from of the Middle East, but the magic dirt of Europe doesn’t obliterate their clannishness or their criminal tendencies. And minimally, the multicultural United States has never been more polarized, with the polarization essentially along racial lines.

Carlson’s comment on the effect of immigration on crime infuriated Salon. All they had to do was quote him commenting on a case where an illegal beheaded a woman in broad daylight in Minnesota after authorities did not deport him:

The Biden administration did this on purpose, and they’re still doing it. And that is exactly why Democrats become hysterical when you mention the obvious successes that are on display here in Hungary on the immigration question. They don’t want you to know that there is an option to the chaos and filth and crime growing all around us.

“Chaos, filth, and crime.” But the idea that there are globalist elites seeking to impose multiculturalism and massive non-White, crime-prone (and low-IQ) immigration on European societies is a complete fantasy in the eyes of the Daily Beast writer:

Using fellow Hungarian [???] George Soros as a catch-all bogeyman, Orbán prides himself as a champion against a massive global conspiracy that involves wealthy and powerful liberals, and international organizations determined to undermine the authority of the state and break the back of nationalistic thought.

The idea that there is no globalist, wealthy, liberal elite that opposes nationalism is absurd. But this elite doesn’t generally undermine the authority of the state. Only if the state is trying to enforce nationalism.

The left loves authoritarianism. It’s a recurrent theme that globalists want to force conformity and obedience on any dissenting entity to produce a homogeneous culture of the left. Later in the show he interviews the always interesting Michael Anton, who notes the same thing about the U.S.: Blue states want to impose their values and way of life on the red states, but the red states just want to be left alone to decide on their own culture, whether it’s energy policy, mask mandates for schoolchildren, or teaching White students to hate themselves (here).

But as I said, the left is apoplectic about seeing such ideas in the conservative mainstream. A recurrent theme is that Hungary under Orbán is authoritarian—that he has dismantled democracy so that there are only sham elections. Here’s Zach Beauchamp at Vox:

Fidesz justified its power grabs by demonizing a series of outgroups and external enemies. If you read the state-aligned press, you’ll learn that only Viktor Orbán can save Hungarian civilization from the threat posed by Muslim immigrants, liberals in the European Union, the LGBT community, and the Jewish billionaire George Soros.

Orbán won reelection in 2015 and 2018, in votes that were formally free but in no sense fair. Fidesz benefitted from massive resource advantages, backing from government-aligned media, and rules designed to tilt the playing field. Though Orbán’s party won less than 50 percent of the vote in the 2018 election, it still won a two-thirds majority in parliament — thanks in part due to gerrymandering.

Today, political scientists see Hungary as a textbook example of something called “competitive authoritarianism”: a kind of autocratic system where elections happen and aren’t formally rigged but are so heavily stacked in the incumbent party’s favor that the people don’t have real agency over who rules them.

One thing that’s obvious about the left these days is that they are not self-aware. They routinely project what they are doing throughout the West onto their enemies. It’s quite reasonable to argue that the left stole the 2020 U.S. election, certainly via biased media coverage, and at least partly by changing the voting laws under cover of the Covid crisis. And quite possibly much worse. Now the left is going all out to continue those laws, rejecting voter ID laws and other election security laws as Jim Crow 2.0. And, despite several of the articles cited here condemning Orbán for imposing a gerrymandering regime favorable to his party, they don’t seem to notice that it’s very mainstream among them to want to get rid of the electoral college, pack the Supreme Court with leftist judges, and get rid of two senators per state. Their entire program promoting maximum levels of legal immigration, amnestying illegals, allowing illegals to vote, disbanding the border patrol, distributing migrants to red states, and pathologizing criticism by Whites that they are being replaced is aimed at creating permanent hegemony—the sort of hegemony that they already have in blue states. Yes, the left loves authoritarianism.

But here’s Vox: “Competitive authoritarian regimes survive, in part, by tricking their citizens — convincing enough of them that democracy is still alive to avoid an uprising.” Exactly what’s happening here. We still have the flag (although even that is in jeopardy) and we have the illusion of free elections. In fact, the vast majority of the media in 2020 was propagandizing for one candidate, demonizing the other, and ignoring anything unsavory about the one they like—Hunter’s notorious laptop.

The left loves authoritarianism, but only when they have power. When they were out of power during the 1950s, they were all about the civil liberties of communist professors and how evil Joe McCarthy was. There developed a whole literature on the evils of suppressing free speech, such as Arthur Miller’s The Crucible which implicitly condemned the  House Un-American Activities Committee by comparing it to the Salem witch trials. But now that they have power, they have used their power to basically end free speech at universities and for anyone in the private sector who they might be able to get fired from their job by calling him a racist or anti-Semite. As this recent article by Glen Allen of the Free Expression Foundation shows, there is already a double standard of justice where the system throws the book at right-wing protesters, including solitary confinement for January 6 protesters awaiting trial, while leftist rioters from last summer who burned and pillaged a great many American cities and attacked police have gotten off scot-free. But here’s Sexton in The Daily Beast complaining that Hungary now is hostile to free speech, impartial law, and representative government:

Within this system [i.e., the former regime], certain rights were considered inalienable and automatic. Expression. The press. The right to representative government and the rule of theoretically impartial law.

The left is now firmly in charge of the entire federal bureaucracy, including the FBI and other national security organs. Dissidents are being purged from the military. It’s gotten to the point that even if, by some miracle, a real populist was elected, he or she would have to direct a massive purge of the federal bureaucracy, from top to bottom, to get their policies implemented and to prevent these agencies from actively working against the administration—as certainly occurred at the FBI with Trump-Russia collusion hoax.

And the media. Vox complains that 90 per cent of the media is in government hands, and The Daily Beast complains about lack of press freedom in Hungary. From the perspective of the dissident right, it’s more like 99.9 percent of the media in the U.S. is in hostile hands, and for mainstream conservatives, 90 percent is probably a good estimate. Here the left benefits from the wokeness of the corporate media, including social media. But the result is the same. A façade of democracy in which most people are simply unaware of what’s really going on. And dissenters from the left, such as Carlson, who have a significant media following, are subjected to activist campaigns against their advertisers.

And The Daily Beast complains that the government is pushing its nationalist ideology in schools, completely ignoring the left’s push for everything from holocaust education to Critical Race Theory and LGBT+ propaganda in public schools. Same outcome, slightly different way of getting obtaining it in the U.S. while paying lip service to liberal democracy.

But for The Daily Beast, in order to make their argument, all they have to do is claim that Orbán, Carlson, et al. are nothing more than lunatic conspiracy theorists.

There is importance in western civilization, they maintain, that must be protected at any and all costs, particularly from evil, criminal traitors determined to undermine it. They are in league with foreigners and constantly manipulating people of color. Behind the scenes lies a shadowy threat pulling the strings. They control the media. They control culture. And liberal democracy, with its freedoms, its espoused equality, with its acceptance of diverse identities and ideas, brings with it the contagion of the very populations and creeds that will dilute the country and undoubtedly destroy it.

If you are on the left, there’s no need to really make an argument that liberal elites are not in control of the media or culture, or that they are not really interested in bringing in in people of color in order to further their agenda. The fact that non-Whites vote Democrat is complete happenstance. And the people who run the media are of no discernable ethnic group, and they are nothing but truth seekers. When you have the kind of power the left has today, all you have to do is just accuse those evildoers of believing in conspiracy theories.

Vox quotes Rod Dreher, Senior Editor at The American Conservative:

The unhappy truth is that liberalism as we Americans have known it is probably dead. Our future is almost certainly going to be left-illiberal or right-illiberal. The right-of-center thought leaders who want to figure out how to resist effectively will be coming to Budapest to observe, to talk, and to learn.”

Vox condemns this because Dreher sees a role for the state in creating a right-wing regime, but, as usual, the author seems blissfully unaware of the obvious authoritarian trends on the left—trends they are doing their best to enshrine with state power. I’m afraid Dreher is right. It’s going to be an authoritarianism of the left or of the right, take your pick. The old conservative values of limited government are non-viable. The old America is dead. And right now, I certainly wouldn’t want to bet on the right eventually winning. While the left is pretty much united around a program of authoritarian control—they love censorship, whether by government or corporations, and would embrace prison terms for thought crimes, as they already do in Europe—the right remains fractionated between idiotic libertarians, traditional country club, business-friendly conservatives (even though corporate America hates them), and religious fundamentalists.

However, it’s somewhat encouraging that 23 percent of Republican men have a favorable view of White nationalists, and actually shocking that 17 percent of Democrat men have a favorable view; and discouraging that only 7 percent of the  electorate have a favorable view of White nationalists—again  highlighting the problem of White women, especially unmarried White women, being more likely to buy into the contemporary zeitgeist of White guilt and the left generally. I’d be interested in a poll where they also asked about attitudes toward Carlson. I suspect that Republican men with favorable views of White nationalists overlap to a large extent with those who are fans of Carlson.

I realize Carlson is not ideal. But there’s no one else even close to him in continuing to hit on the issues that vitally affect White America. It’s no surprise that his trip to Hungary set off a firestorm on the left,  or that the ADL was furious when he referred to White replacement. I think he’s waking a lot of people up, and that terrifies the leftleft%2FWhatsAppEmailPrintFriendlyShare

Share this entry

6 replies

  1. todd hupp todd hupp says: Orban is upfront-very direct. Great interview. He wants Hungary reserved for the indigenous white people.Interestingly he pointed out : the central european countries -who recall Russian communism- largely agree with the Hungary policies.Poland in particular.They were pro Trump. BTW: The Russian takeover as sole gas provider to Europe(via Nord Stream) is a very dangerous situation.From Germany pipelines will distribute Russian gas to most of Europe and the UK.Trump had negotiated a portion natural gas would be USA LNG.Biden has dropped this requirement-inexplicably and against USA policy.The left US press is not reporting on this.Russian control of energy=Russian control. The equity for Nord Stream @ 30% comes from European pipeline operators and Gasprom.70% is debt from large European banks.It is reported that a well connected/well funded DC lobby group made this happen against US interests , Reply
  2. Tim Folke Tim Folke says: It is encouraging to see a few bright spots in this darkening world, such as Hungary, Russia and to some extent Poland. These countries know that, in order to survive, their folk, culture and children must be protected. Courage is contagious, and I am grateful for people like Tucker Carlson, as well as the writers on this and other sites. There are still good places in America as well. Last June we went to the Bigfoot Festival in Metaline Falls, WA (NE corner of Washington State). I would guess there were several thousand people there. No weirdos, no unnatural hair colors, no rainbow flags, kids were well behaved and the women wore the jewelry. Just a lot of our folk having a good time and telling Bigfoot stories, some of which may have even been true! Reply
  3. Jo Jo says: The Right is divided. Their most charismatic and articulate spokesman, Jared Taylor of American Renaissance, ignores the JQ entirely. Whether that is for pragmatic reasons — why take on another powerful enemy — or out of conviction is unclear. The most firmly held assumption of postwar morality, that the Nazis were irredeemably evil, has led us ad absurdum. They adopted policies in extremis to overcome a similar predicament to the one we now face. The assumption must be dropped. Reply
  4. Tom Tom says: I’ve been watching Tucker’s broadcasts from Hungary and they are fantastic indeed, not to mention a big F#*k You at the American Left also. The guy’s got balls, but of course he also knows how to choose his words and targets carefully so as to avoid something along the lines of the sacking of Pat Buchanan from mainstream media.
    The mind-boggling thing about the American Left is its hippieish, totally adolescent conception of morals. For a modern leftist, EVERYTHING is a human right, from defecating on sidewalks to illegal alien voting “rights” to free food and college. Basically, if you want something, they see it as a duty of the state to either deliver it or safeguard it. Those who disagree are then considered “illiberal” and “authoritarian”. This stupidity is the reason for the Left’s cocksure confidence in their visions for a new society. It literally is like dealing with rotten children who demand anything and everything from their parents. In this case however, the “parent” now becomes the state. Reply
  5. tito perdue tito perdue says: I urge Carlson to get into elective politics Reply
  6. CM CM says: Thank you for reviewing this program segment from Tucker Carlson. I’ll take his faults to have the benefits of the really good coverage Carlson gives topics like this. Especially interesting to me is that Orban is a member of the Calvinist Hungarian Reformed Church connecting him to the movement of Calvinists – Presbyterians, Dutch Reformed, French Huguenots – which formed the US. Calvin advocated for the republic as the best form of governance and to support it also instituted schools which educated all the people, men, women, and children since he was fully aware that only an educated populace would be capable of self-rule. Hungary’s most recent Constitution also asserts that Hungary is a Christian nation. I regret that our Christian founding fathers let Jefferson and others get away with not including such a statement in our US Constitution. Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Name *

Email *

Website

Notify me of follow-up comments by email.

Notify me of new posts by email.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

More Anti-White Hatred in Academe

Posted on by

More Anti-White Hatred in Academe

Yale did absolutely nothing about her talk until mainstream conservatives started talking about it.

Here’s Tucker Carlson from last night (~40′).https://youtu.be/4NsjZUBE9lE – taken down –

Expressions of Anti-White Hatred in High Places: Aruna Khilanani at Yale