Blog Archives

Importing Politics Punjabi Style

Posted on by

Brampton Deputy Mayor Harkirat Singh helped direct $24M in taxpayer funding to his own corporation

  • Muhammad Hamza, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter & Joel Wittnebel The Pointer
  • 14 hrs ago

Brampton Deputy Mayor Harkirat Singh has voted to give more than $24 million in public funds to Niwaas Living, a not-for-profit organization he registered and founded, and where he currently serves as the head of fundraising. Singh has never declared a conflict of interest during the meetings when applications for funding from Niwaas Living to build two affordable housing projects in the city were being discussed by council, and he has not mentioned his leadership position with the organization when council considered millions of dollars in taxpayer-funded grants for the initiatives Singh pushed.

Council approved grants to Niwaas Living for $10.8 million and $14 million earlier this year for two affordable housing projects, despite the organization’s lack of experience—it had no history building affordable housing, and did not yet own the land where it was proposing to build the projects, documents shared with The Pointer reveal. Council approved $10.8 million for Niwaas Living before it was even officially incorporated, documents show. 

During council meetings when Singh’s push for funding was dealt with, no members raised any issues with the obvious risks, or questioned Singh’s connection to the organization, despite at least two of them being aware of his role. Councillors Gurpartap Singh Toor and Navjit Kaur Brar also sit on the Fundraising Cabinet for Niwaas Long-Term Care. 

The Municipal Conflict of Interest Act (MCIA) outlines the responsibilities of elected council members, emphasizing their duty to perform “with integrity and impartiality, in a manner that will bear the closest scrutiny.” To meet this high standard, the MCIA dictates the actions elected officials must take when they are involved in a legislative meeting where a matter related to their personal financial (pecuniary) interest could be impacted. 

Singh told The Pointer he has no financial stake in Niwaas Living, and receives no compensation for his volunteer position, and therefore he is not in a conflict.  

“I have no direct or indirect pecuniary interest in any Niwaas entity, nor do any of my family members. Neither have I nor my family members received any compensation,” Singh told The Pointer. “I have no conflict of interest and have confirmed this with the Integrity Commissioner.”

According to Singh, Niwaas Living is separate from Niwaas Long-Term Care. 

“The Cabinet does not fundraise for Living,” he said.

Councillor Toor and Councillor Brar did not respond to questions. 

Both, along with Councillor Singh, are part of a large bloc on council loyal to Mayor Patrick Brown, who named Singh deputy mayor this term. 

Singh provided no further details about the advice given to him by Brampton Integrity Commissioner Muneeza Sheikh and declined to share their communications to back-up his claim.

Sheikh, who was given the position despite having no experience in municipal law and no experience as an integrity commissioner, was heavily criticized for taking on the role due to her connections with Brown. She was fired during the previous term of council. Reporting detailed how she had billed the City of Brampton more than seven times the amount of previous integrity commissioners. In 2022, she was rehired by Mayor Brown. An image of the two was used during one of Brown’s political campaigns, and she voiced support for him after allegations of sexual assault forced him to resign as Ontario PC Leader in 2018. Brown denies the allegations. When Brown quietly opened up a City hockey arena so he and friends could play during the pandemic lockdown, when such use was prohibited, Sheikh ignored key facts, failed to interview witnesses and relied on Brown’s word despite video evidence of his wrongdoing. In the face of widespread public criticism over Brown’s conduct, she exonerated him. 

Singh has been a staunch supporter of Brown throughout numerous controversies that have engulfed the mayor, and voted in 2022 to cancel sweeping investigations into alleged misconduct by the mayor, another council member and senior staff in procurements, hirings and other matters, after the probes had been launched by a majority group of councillors during the last term.

Sheikh’s own hiring was one of the controversial decisions that was being investigated, until Singh, Brown and three other council members had enough votes during a snap Friday afternoon meeting the mayor called when councillor absences allowed him to cancel the sweeping probes in August of 2022.

Singh, along with Brown and Councillor Rowena Santos, were the key members who pushed the heavily criticized Brampton University plan, which involved lucrative payments to friends of Brown and Santos. All three voted to cancel the investigation into the failed project after damning evidence had already been brought forward through the probe.  

“It just reinforces this pattern of friends and family always seem to find their way to the front of the line,” Brampton lawyer Wesley Jackson told The Pointer, regarding Councillor Singh’s efforts to secure $24 million from taxpayers for his own organization’s projects. Jackson provided the land transfer documents and business registry files for Niwaas to The Pointer. “What really concerns me, though, is that (Singh) didn’t mention it in the council meeting. Other councillors, at least one other councillor was aware (of Singh’s position with the organization) and didn’t mention it in the meeting, and not one councillor asked to do any due diligence,” Jackson said. 

“Niwaas was not even in diapers yet…$24 million is a lot of money to give to a charity in its infancy.”

The timeline of the creation and early work of Niwaas Living and Niwaas Long-Term Care, and the relationship between the two are unclear. Councillor Singh wrote in his own City of Brampton biography that he founded and established Niwaas Long-Term Care, and that the organization later created Niwaas Living.

Niwaas Living first appeared before Brampton councillors during a Planning and Development Committee meeting in August 2024. Sunny Yashpal and Daniya Dhillon requested “support” in the organization’s work to build affordable housing in Brampton.  

The pair outlined two affordable housing projects. One on Clarence Street to construct 90 units, and a second on Bramalea Road for 100 units. 

Yashpal and Dhillon said councillors could help them by “referring this delegation to staff”.

Singh, who was chairing the meeting, was the only one to speak to the proposal.

“I think it’s an interesting opportunity,” he said. “A faith-based organization building housing for all.”

Singh did not disclose that he had created Niwaas Long-Term Care which, according to his own bio, launched Niwaas Living.  

Immediately after, a lengthy motion was put up on the screen in council chambers referencing the City of Brampton’s housing plan, the 113,000-unit housing target mandated for the city by the PC government, and a recommendation to send the Niwaas Living request to staff for “further consideration, including opportunities for the City to provide support for the delivery of the affordable housing units in the Niwaas Living projects.” 

Singh moved the motion, which carried. 

It’s unclear when Niwaas Living was first created, and whether Councillor Singh was involved at the time of the August, 2024 meeting. Singh later wrote in his bio that the organization was “launched” by Niwaas Long-Term Care, which he “founded”. 

According to the August, 2024 presentation to council the “organization’s formal structure is currently under construction”. 

As of April, 2025, Singh’s biography on the City of Brampton website detailed how he “founded and established Niwaas Long-Term Care, a 160-bed facility, and chairs its Fundraising Cabinet.” 

Singh’s bio continues: “Most recently, Niwaas Long-Term Care launched Niwaas Living, an affordable housing non-profit developing 90 family units in Brampton, 40 of which will be deeply affordable.” 

The October 2024 version of Singh’s biography on the City of Brampton website does not mention Niwaas Living. Using the Wayback Machine website, it shows the mention of Niwaas does not appear until April 2025

Niwaas Long-Term Care has been working to build a long-term care facility to cater to Brampton’s Sikh community since 2020. It is currently under construction at 380 Fernforest Drive. 

Business registration documents show Niwaas Living was officially registered by Singh on April 4, 2025. He told The Pointer this is the extent of his involvement with both Niwaas Long-Term Care and Niwaas Living.

“After helping structure and set up the non-profits, my participation has been very limited.” 

Singh has appeared at least twice in videos on social media this year to provide updates on the progress of construction on the long-term care facility on behalf of the not-for-profit organization. 

“I want to acknowledge the hard work of the Niwaas Long-Term Care team. I want to acknowledge our provincial partners and the City of Brampton for all the support,” Singh said in a post in July of this year. He appeared again in a September post.

Following the referral from Council’s planning committee, the request from Niwaas did not come back to council until March of this year. 

A motion, again introduced by Singh, requested council support to give $10.8 million to the 90-unit Niwaas Affordable Rental Project on Clarence Street through the City’s Community Improvement Plan (CIP) for affordable housing. According to the motion, the investment would be funded through the Building Faster Fund and Housing Accelerator Fund. 

The motion also orders the City Treasurer to “transfer funding from reserves and close identified capital projects to fund the new capital project.” 

There was no staff report to accompany the motion. Typically, such large grant requests are vetted through staff to ensure there are adequate funds available, and whether there are any risks to the City. 

There does not appear to be any staff report assessing the Niwaas project, with typical studies to review traffic flow, compatibility with official and master plans, environmental requirements, various engineering regulations or other municipal work that has to be done when approving such an initiative, especially when millions of taxpayer dollars are being used.    

It’s unclear how the City’s reliance on the Building Faster Fund to reimburse it for the investment will be impacted after the City of Brampton missed out on $25 million in funding this year due to slow housing development. It’s also unclear which capital projects, if any, were closed to accommodate the Niwaas Living investment. 

The motion carried. 

A second request came to council in May, this time accompanied by a staff report, recommending the approval of $14 million for the Niwaas Living project on Bramalea Road. The development will include 100 units; 52 are proposed to be affordable. Staff recommended the funding also come from the City’s Community Improvement Plan, a program that includes funds from builders usually paid in exchange for expanded development projects; which is also supported by the Housing Accelerator Fund. 

According to the report, the City has $55.3 million remaining of the $114.5 million allocated by the province through the Housing Accelerator Fund.  

“In the unlikely event that there is an interruption in the receipt of future funding installments, the City will assess impacts to funding and at the Treasurer’s discretion may consider reprioritizing its capital program to avail alternative funding sources,” the report explains. 

During the meeting, a visibly frustrated Councillor Michael Palleschi, expressed concern that organizations were “jumping before the queue”, leaving others to wait for funding assistance. In particular, he questioned staff on the status of approved funding for Home Opportunities, one of the first agencies to receive assistance from the City of Brampton (which is building the most affordable units) who he indicated had yet to receive its funding. 

“This isn’t fair,” he said. “Funding is becoming an issue.” 

He was assured by staff that the funding for Home Opportunities was secure, and linked to project milestones that needed to be achieved for dollars to flow. 

Councillor Dennis Keenan, while supportive of the report and its recommendation, also questioned the process. Neither Palleschi nor Keenan mentioned any connection between Niwaas Living and Deputy Mayor Singh. 

“We’ve had a few applications in and we set those guidelines around what is supposed to be happening so I want to confirm this also follows those same guidelines,” Keenan said. “As well that those people…no one is jumping any queues.”

He continued: “I want to make sure those other organizations are receiving their funds as well.”

Steve Ganesh, Brampton’s Commissioner of Planning, Building and Growth Management, assured council that the Niwaas Living application was following procedure. “All of the protocols and practices that have been in the previous examples and brought before council will apply here.” 

Singh spoke in favour of the recommendation to give $14 million to Niwaas Living. He appeared to admit his connection to the organization. 

“I know we’ll get all these shovels in the ground very soon,” he said, apparently using “we” in reference to the project’s proponents.  

The status of these projects is currently not known. When council approved the $24 million in funding, Niwaas Living did not own the land for either of the projects it was proposing. When the first grant was approved in March, Niwaas Living had not even been incorporated yet; Singh would register it in April of this year. 

According to the March motion, the Clarence Street project had reached “key development milestones and is close to shovel-ready, with construction expected to begin within 30 days, pending financing.” 

This appears to be a mischaracterization. 

Land transfer documents shared with The Pointer show Niwaas Living did not yet own the property at 17 Clarence Street when the motion was approved in March 2025. The company did not take ownership until July 31 after the land was sold through a power of sale. 

Land transfer documents for 11556 Bramalea Road show Niwaas Living did not take ownership until July 23 of this year. 

Singh did not answer questions about his knowledge of the power of sale process, or why he introduced a motion to hand millions of dollars in taxpayer money to an organization that did not yet own the land they proposed to build on. 

“I don’t question what you’re doing. I’m questioning how you’re doing it,” Jackson said to The Pointer, acknowledging the desperate need for affordable housing in the city. “It is an abuse of his position to put his own charity in front of the line.

“He’s in a position to know when these new federal programs are created and when the funds are available to the city, and he’s in a position to immediately incorporate a new organization and table a motion to get them the money,” Jackson continued. “Whereas other organizations in town aren’t even necessarily aware that the program is available yet. So it’s an abuse of his position to put, like I say, friends, family and his own charity at the front of the line. So fine, you don’t have a pecuniary interest, I can accept that. I still don’t understand how your organization got to the front of the line.”

Jackson sees a familiar pattern with the current council and Mayor Brown.

“It’s a pattern of asking for forgiveness instead of permission. Yeah, it’s always after the fact that everything is now being disclosed. Nothing’s ever disclosed in advance,” he says. “I would certainly trace it back to the last term of Council, when Councillor (Rowena) Santos and Mayor Brown voted on their own motion to cancel an audit of their own conduct.”

In August 2022, Brown, with the support of a majority of council, voted to close investigations into his conduct during the Brampton University scandal that saw $630,000 of taxpayer money handed to friends of his and Councillor Rowena Santos. Investigators were looking into his connections to a consultant hired for the work when Brown, supported by Santos, Singh, Palleschi and Councillor Paul Vicente, voted to cancel the investigations. Taxpayers have been provided no information about the failed university project, the funds that were spent, and whether anyone was held accountable for a plan that seemed doomed from the beginning. The Ontario Ombudsman, despite twice directing Brown and the rest of council to complete the probes, has declined to investigate himself. 

“It’s something that permeated Council all through this term, and it started in the last term of Council, where conflicts of interest are essentially ignored unless somebody shines a light on it,” Jackson says. “I think citizens need this sort of information…they need to know that the councillors are actually doing what’s in the best interest of the city, not themselves, not the charity they established.”

Email: muhammad.hamza@thepointer.com

Email: joel.wittnebel@thepointer.com

At a time when vital public information is needed by everyone, The Pointer has taken down our paywall on all stories to ensure every resident of Brampton, Mississauga and Niagara has access to the facts. For those who are able, we encourage you to consider a subscription. This will help us report on important public interest issues the community needs to know about now more than ever. You can register for a 30-day free trial HERE. Thereafter, The Pointer will charge $10 a month and you can cancel any time right on the website. Thank you

Five East Indians in Canada accused of Amazon Fraud

Posted on by

Why wasn’t this covered in the lamestream media — CBC, CTV, Global — that tend the keep ethnic crime from Old Stock Canadians who just might catch on to the fact that they are the Disposssessed Majority

l.

ll.

Maxime Bernier Says Canada’s Identity is Being Erased

Posted on by

Seven years ago, the People’s Party was founded to sound the alarm.

Today, that alarm is a siren.

Canada is being erased—not by accident, but by design.

We were never meant to be a loose collection of ethnic enclaves, a patchwork of foreign cultures with no common story, no common ground, no common future.

Yet that is exactly what decades of Liberal and Conservative policy have delivered: a nation stripped of its identity, defined only by divisive dogma—radical multiculturalism, woke ideology, and the cult of diversity.

But Canada has an identity. A real one.

Built on Indigenous, French, and British foundations, and strengthened by generations of immigrants who came not to replace our heritage, but to join it.

Since the 1970s, this identity has been under attack. 

Mass immigration without integration, official multiculturalism without unity, and now, the toxic spread of DEI (Diversity, Equity and Inclusion) and anti-white racism—all aided and abetted by successive Liberal and Conservative governments.

If everything can be Canadian, then nothing is Canadian.

And if we continue down this path, Canada will not survive.

Quebec will leave. Alberta will go its own way. What remains may simply dissolve.

We are running out of time—and Pierre Poilievre’ Conservatives offer no vision, no courage, only pandering and a thirst for power.

This is not a drill. This is the fight for Canada’s future.

We must raise $200,000 by December 31 to fuel this fight. 

We’re one-third of the way there—but we need you now.

Maxime Bernier Says Canada’s Identity is Being Erased

Seven years ago, the People’s Party was founded to sound the alarm.

Today, that alarm is a siren.

Canada is being erased—not by accident, but by design.

We were never meant to be a loose collection of ethnic enclaves, a patchwork of foreign cultures with no common story, no common ground, no common future.

Yet that is exactly what decades of Liberal and Conservative policy have delivered: a nation stripped of its identity, defined only by divisive dogma—radical multiculturalism, woke ideology, and the cult of diversity.

But Canada has an identity. A real one.

Built on Indigenous, French, and British foundations, and strengthened by generations of immigrants who came not to replace our heritage, but to join it.

Since the 1970s, this identity has been under attack. 

Mass immigration without integration, official multiculturalism without unity, and now, the toxic spread of DEI (Diversity, Equity and Inclusion) and anti-white racism—all aided and abetted by successive Liberal and Conservative governments.

If everything can be Canadian, then nothing is Canadian.

And if we continue down this path, Canada will not survive.

Quebec will leave. Alberta will go its own way. What remains may simply dissolve.

We are running out of time—and Pierre Poilievre’ Conservatives offer no vision, no courage, only pandering and a thirst for power.

This is not a drill. This is the fight for Canada’s future.

We must raise $200,000 by December 31 to fuel this fight. 

We’re one-third of the way there—but we need you now.

What’s happened to Tim Horton’s?

Posted on by

What’s happened to Tim Horton’s, once a Canadian icon? It’s now part of the Great Replacement — replacing Canada’s founding/settler people.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/Qk7xYINZ8Vg3

SCANDAL: Grimsby, Ontario, Tim Hortons employees at 4 different locations get pink slips for Christmas – and are being replaced by foreigners

Posted on by

SCANDAL: Grimsby, Ontario, Tim Hortons employees at 4 different locations get pink slips for Christmas – and are being replaced by foreigners.

Still don’t think you’re being replaced?SCANDAL: Grimsby, Ontario, Tim Hortons employees at 4 different locations get pink slips for Christmas – and are being replaced by foreigners.

Still don’t think you’re being replaced?

Young Canadians — The Unhappy Generation

Posted on by

Flooding Canada will millions of Third Worlders might be the reason.

Antidote to the American Poison

Posted on by

Absolutely brilliant analysis of where “we” are at as Whites(European Americans) and  of Whites around the world and of Europe proper. .Do not be put off by the tittle , because the American poison that he refers to is the Judeo American ruling class and their poisonous antiWhiteism (multiculturalism ) that “they” have inflicted on us .

His solution .. Tribe up stick together.. separate from other ethnicities (physically) .

Diversity is a codeword for White genocide ! The best speech that I have heard in my life advocating for White unity !

Sir Robert Menzies, 12th Prime Minister of Australia, on the White Australia Policy:

Posted on by

Sir Robert Menzies, 12th Prime Minister of Australia, on the White Australia Policy:

“We ought to aim at having a homogeneous population; I don’t want to see reproduced in Australia the kind of problem they have in South Africa, or in America, or, increasingly, in Great Britain.

The Great Replacement and Independence in Alberta, Canada

Posted on by

The Great Replacement and Independence in Alberta, Canada

White Papers Policy Institute

Dec 12, 2025

Canada’s wealthiest and most developed province is cruising rather quickly towards independence, at least rhetorically. The Provincial government of United Conservative Party Premier Danielle Smith has lowered the number of signatures required for independence advocates to force a referendum on the issue while Smith herself has said that Albertans are deeply discontented with the Canadian Confederation and its current constitutional structure.

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith

Numerous polls in May of 2025 showed that support for separation from Canada has risen as high as 45% (at times) and a recent poll from September of 2025 showed the pro-independence Republican Party of Alberta garnering roughly 11% in the event of an election.

White Papers is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

The reasons for these growing sentiments are varied and range from a deep distaste over Canada’s transfer system (wealthy, productive provinces’ tax money extracted to fund welfare in other provinces) and of course, immigration.

In the National Post of Canada, an Alberta columnist who doesn’t think separatism has much of a chance (despite his “near-total sympathy with most of Alberta’s grievances against Canada”) explains what some of these are:

he very constitution of the country is explicitly rigged to diminish our electoral and senatorial power. Our heavy funding of the rest of Confederation seems to earn us nothing but contempt from central Canada. I don’t have major complaints about explicit fiscal equalization between provinces per se, apart from the unceasing ad-hoc updates, but equalization is just the questionably necessary top layer of a cake.

Other provinces’ economies are all to some degree engineered around employment insurance, and around contrived seasonal industries that wink in and out of existence to allow for the hoovering of implicit labour subsidies from the federation. And unlike most of what the species calls “insurance,” eligibility to collect is lowered for the regions that use EI inveterately, not raised. The long-term effects of this haven’t been good for anybody.

Alberta’s contributions to the Canada Pension Plan are also, as the recent controversy over a project for an Alberta Pension Plan showed, enormously disproportionate. The most important source of Alberta’s relative wealth is its oil and gas, and perhaps the rest of Confederation is now prepared to stop treating this industry as a despicable moral poison. But what the RoC certainly won’t stop doing is dismissing Alberta hydrocarbons as a lucky endowment from heaven to which the province has no legitimate moral entitlement — unlike, say, nickel mines, or ocean fisheries, or hydropower, or potash and uranium, or old-growth forests and coastlines. [Links added]

Coastlines are something Alberta definitely lacks: it’s due north of Montana:

A map of canada with red and black text

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Polling from October of 2025 showed that 56% of Canadians feel there are too many immigrants in Canada while data published by the Canadian government in September of 2024 showed that among Albertans 56% felt there were too many immigrants in their province and just 7% felt there were too few. 63% of Canadians feel there are too many permanent immigrants in their country while about half of Canadians feel their government is admitting too many refugees and asylum seekers. In all of these cases the figures are higher in Alberta than in any other province safe for the rapidly changing Ontario.

The message is quite clear, Albertans are unhappy with the status quo in Canada. Yet, independence will not resolve these issues if it is not consciously pro-Canadian or in this case pro-Albertan. An independence movement rooted in post-war liberalism—which includes a dedicated to multiculturalism—will see Alberta created as just another rootless cosmopolitan country on the world stage. One whose native population of Westerners is rapidly being shuffled out the door in favor of disparate Third Worlders. In other words, not substantially different from the situation in Alberta right now.

Between 1941 and 2021 Alberta’s population of White/European Canadians (the country’s foundational stock) declined from roughly 96% of the province’s population to about 65.4% of the population. Projections provided by the Canadian government estimate that White/European Canadians will be a minority in the province by 2041. The same elite that have advocated for and enabled this radical demographic transformation are the same elite that would be entrenched in a newly independent Alberta. Nothing would change.

Instead of pouring their energies into a sovereignty movement that is unlikely to succeed and even if it does unlikely to make demographics better, Albertans need to redirect the clear energy they exhibit for politics and begin to push for a reversal of the Great Replacement in their province. They could advocate for powers similar to Quebec and thus enable the Albertan government to curtail the number of new economic migrants and Albertans could and must begin to actively campaign against the Great Replacement in the same way so many are currently campaigning for independence.

There will be no Alberta if there are no Canadians, no Albertans, left to inhabit it.

How to Support White Papers:

We keep our policy analysis free because we’re dedicated to the independence and prosperity of our people. But we rely on our paid subscribers to grow and thrive!

White Papers is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

White Papers is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Consider giving to our mission using one of the methods below.

Zelle: whitepapersinstitute@protonmail.com

Linktree: https://linktr.ee/wppi

Snail Mail: White Papers Policy, PO Box 192, Hancock, MD 21750

20 Likes

7 Restacks

Former Political Prisoner Bill Whatcott Asks: Should Alberta Become the 51st State

Posted on by

These are just a few of my thoughts as to why I think Albertans should be open to the idea of becoming the 51st state.

Here in Canada I got charged with a hate crime for criticizing (completely non-violent speech, quoting STD statistics, and Bible verses) the taxpayer funded Toronto Pride parade. The parade gets municipal, federal and provincial tax dollars so homosexuals can run around with their genitals exposed in public and act out their weird fetishes. The US on the other hand, when I went to their border, they were aware of the outstanding charge, and said such speech is no crime in their country and they let me in.

I have a low income friend who had heart issues in North Dakota. When he got sick Medicaid paid for an air ambulance and he received state of the art medical care in Fargo which saved his life. In contrast another friend of mine in Lacombe AB who got cancer, was put on a waitlist to see an oncologist and literally died six months later as the cancer spread and killed him, and he never saw an Oncologist. He died untreated on a waitlist.

In America you can criticize and hate on the orange man all day long, and many woke Americans do just that. In Canada more than a half dozen Canadians faced criminal charges for criticizing Trudeau online when he was emperor.

Trump got 17,000 illegal Punjabi truckers off the roads in California alone last month. Some woke Canadians think that is mean. American truckers are grateful, the roads are safer and it is not hard for born Americans to get a job in their trucking industry. White Canadians are not getting jobs in our trucking industry, even if they have experience and safe driving records. If you don’t believe me look at Highway 2 between Calgary and Edmoton, 90% of the truckers are Punjabi and the few whites that are still behind the wheel will have a very hard time finding another job if they ever quit their current job or get laid off.

Over the past 5 years the Liberals have flooded our country with more than 4 million East Indians (exact stats are hard to find on Google but since 2021 the Liberals granted 4 million student visas. Most of these so-called student visas are to fake schools and in reality the East Indians in Canada on these visas work in trucking and fast food and just stay in Canada when their “student” visas expire. We also have millions more East Indians who came to Canada as so-called refugees and TFWs, marriage visas, just illegally cross over the border, etc….) I believe Rebel News reported on one of their programs we have over 10 million recent East Indian migrants in our country, fundamentally shifting our demographic balance, obliterating our Canadian culture, and leaving many Canadians without homes or jobs.

Unlike Americans, Canadian youth and many adults are facing long term unemployment, and housing insecurity. Trump’s tarrifs are not popular with many Canadians, but if you turn off your fake, taxpayer funded, Canadian news; those tarrifs are doing what they are supposed to do for Americans. They are bringing back manufacturing jobs to the United States and more than 10,000 good paying manufacturing jobs left Canada for the USA already, as America has a more friendly business environment and businesses that relocate to the US can avoid the tariffs that way.

Law abiding Americans get to legally own guns down that Canadians can’t legally own, unless we are an elite and get a very difficult to obtain special permit to own “prohibited” firearms. Judges, police chiefs or high ranking politicians get these permits, no one else.

I dunno, I’m good with Alberta being a 51st state. I note Alberta companies like Enbridge are making pipelines right now in the USA and to date they are still not able to make any pipelines up here. The average American has 40% more disposable income than the average Canadian and unlike Canadian army bases, US army bases don’t have tampons in their men’s bathrooms. That’s a plus as well……

— Former Political Prisoner Bill Whatcott