MARK YOUR CALENDARS: HEAR PAUL FROMM ON WHITE GENOCIDE IN SOUTH AFRICA, TORONTO, WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 21, 8:00 P.M

Posted on by
MARK YOUR CALENDARS: HEAR PAUL FROMM ON WHITE GENOCIDE IN SOUTH AFRICA, TORONTO, WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 21, 8:00 P.M.

The Canada First Immigration Reform Committee Proudly Present

Paul Fromm
Director, Canadian Association for Free Expression
Winner of the George Orwell Free Speech Award, 1994

White Genocide in South Africa
* Research from my trip to South Africa for a book on plight of Whites in ANC/Communist Party ruled S.A.
* Genocide Watch Dr. Gregory Stanton says S.A. is in the 6th of 7 stages of genocide
* 70,000 Whites murdered since 1994
* Brutal Affirmative action denies Whites jobs or promotions

TORONTO. Wednesday, September 21, 2016. YOUR WARD NEWS Office — 163 Main Street, just south of Gerrard. It is a 5 minute walk south of Main Station on the Bloor-Danforth Subway line Free parking on the street. 8:00 p.m. [$10 admission]

* Sorry, I can’t attend. Please send me the audiotape of Mr. Fromm’s talk. $6.00
* I’d also like to assist with the cost of this meeting. Here is my donation of $_______.
Name:___________________________________Phone:____ __________________________________________________ ______
Address:__________________________________________ __________________________________________________ ________
C-FAR, P.O. Box 332, Rexdale, ON., M9W 5L3.

 

 

Second Deadliest Birthrate Affecting All of Humanity, Part II: India

Posted on by

Second Deadliest Birthrate Affecting All of Humanity, Part II: India

by Frosty Wooldridgefrostywooldridge.com

Part I | Part II | Part III | Part IV

Congested Indian city
Future Look of Canadian Cities with coming Massive Migration from India

India expects to jump from 1.252 billion to 1.55 billion crammed humans within 34 years. It adds 16 million, net gain, annually. Today, Indians flood into America with chain-migration and added birth rates. Indians do not believe in birth control. As Indian’s population grows, its human misery index explodes off the charts, and ever more Indians migrate to European lands for better living standards. Let’s take a look at what ramifications we face from immigration from India.

In 1960, India reached 500,000,000 (million) people. Today, driven by multiple ancient religions that prohibit birth control, India suffers every kind of social and environmental consequence known to humanity with its 1.252 billion people. Even more catastrophic, it adds 16 million more people, net gain, annually.

India’s major river, the Ganges, which I once rafted, flows into the ocean with the most polluted, toxic and contaminated waters known to humankind. It features trillions of gallons of untreated sewage, industrial waste, hundreds of chemicals and millions of pieces of plastics — that flow into the ocean 24/7. That watery, chemicalized conveyer belt creates a 20,000 square mile dead zone at the mouth of the Ganges. Once it hits the Indian Ocean, those contaminated waters spread all over the planet — poisoning marine life, avian life, reefs, the ocean floor and cause deadly acidification throughout the planet.

Of note, the USA, China and India dump the most plastics into the world’s oceans. Latest estimates show 5.25 trillion pieces of plastic float above and flow under the surface around the world — killing millions of marine creatures annually. As per investigations by marine biologist Julia Whitty, 46,000 pieces of plastic trash float on every square mile of Earth’s oceans. In a word: sickening! Why? Because we’ve known this for 20 years, but no action to stop it by creating incentive-driven deposit-return laws internationally.

Within India, hundreds of millions of people lack a toilet. Therefore, theydefecate-urinate on the land daily. In fact, the Indian Express said, “Best experts tell us that 60.4 percent of Indians lack a toilet.” As you can imagine, the stench in the cities, the filth in the streets and the total contamination of soils and rivers by that many people injecting their waste upon the lands and waters 24/7 — cannot be comprehended.

Thus, everyday of the year, 1,000 Indian children under the age of 12 die of dysentery, diarrhea and other waterborne diseases die from drinking contaminated water.

Yet, as India’s population accelerates by 16 million net gain annually, they grow so fast, they cannot solve any of their problems. Disease and squalor top the “human misery index” beyond the concepts of the American people.

You can only imagine that India cannot support jobs, classrooms and housing for that many people added annually. Yet, not one word about population stabilization from India’s leaders. At one point, Indira Gandhi attempted to bring birth control to India when I visited in 1984, but she failed because of religious-cultural norms that overpowered reasoned thinking.

If you look at the beauty of the Taj Mahal, one of the most famous landmarks of India, a short trip to the river next to it shows millions of pieces of plastic clogging its waters. And, the water features endless chemical poisons leaving it unfit for human or animal use.

Typical Indian river
Typical Indian river


In the cities, air pollution poisons the lungs of everyone breathing that toxic air 24/7. You see everyone tapping into electrical wires illegally at every juncture. You see filth, trash and stench everywhere. When you see the traffic, it’s a free-for-all that confounds and confuses the Western mind. The National Nutritional Monitoring Bureau estimates that only 15 percent of Indians receive adequate nourishment daily.

As can be imagined, because of adding that 16 million more people annually, India’s wilderness suffers encroachment via roads, housing, mining, lumbering and other development. Animal extinction rates soar in India. The Bengal Tiger and the Snow Leopard will not survive in the wilds within several decades. Elephants face an uncertain future. Birds of all kinds face extinction from loss of habitat. Fish and plants vanish as Indians invade and demolish habitat.

With all the realities facing the people of India, no one will raise a finger to address their population predicament. Even in the face of so much human misery, their leaders live in “cognitive dissonance” also known as “intellectual denial of reality.”

Please realize that I am covering the tip of the iceberg in this series. At any time, we may witness horrific outbreaks of cholera and other diseases that will kill millions in Asia.

But what does it mean for all of us in the USA or other western countries like Canada, Europe and Australia?

To be frank, we face a global mess that will ultimately arrive on a big platter forced down our throats. Today, millions of Indians clamor for visas to move to the USA and Canada. The rich ones buy their way into America. Some Indians discovered how to gain loans to buy all the motels across America. They continue accelerated chain-migration with that niche.

Indian masses
Indians scrambling for transportation to the West


By 2050, a scant 34 years from now, India expects to out-populate China to reach 1.55 billion people. As it stands, they lack the ‘arable land’ to grow enough food. They clearly lack clean water as they dry up their ground water supplies.

If you think the refugee crisis facing Europe last year and continuing this year, you haven’t seen anything yet.

When India starts facing hunger crises via lack of arable land, lack of rainfall, and growing ‘catastrophic climate destabilization’ with its 1.252 billion people — we’re all in trouble. Hordes upon hordes of them will push their way into the West, ransacking everything in sight.

Yet no amount of immigration will solve anything for Indians. No amount of international aid will help them. Why? Because they keep growing human numbers beyond any solutions. Instead, Indians will export their demographic plight to the West, along with millions upon millions of Africans thirsting for European lands.

Deadliest Birthrate Affecting All of Humanity, Part I: Africa

Posted on by

Deadliest Birthrate Affecting All of Humanity, Part I: Africa

With the highest fertility rates in the world, Africa’s population will explode in the next decades and the plan of the corporations and the cultural Marxists is to settle millions upon millions of Africans in the West to “solve” this crisis.

by Frosty Wooldridge

Auguste Comte: Demography is destiny

As immigration, both legal and illegal, continues flooding into the United States of America — it also pours into Canada, Australia and Europe. Note that all Western countries stabilized their populations since 1970 by averaging 2.0 children or less per female.

Unfortunately, as first world countries created stable and sustainable societies since 1970, their leaders chose unending immigration from overloaded third world countries. For the United States, the late Senator Teddy Kennedy created the 1965 Immigration Reform Act that added 100 million people to America by October of 2006. If continued, that same act expects to add another 100 million people within 34 years. Where do those immigrants originate? Answer: the third world that adds 80 million, net gain, annually.

Unknown to most countries and people living on this planet, an accelerating birthrate in Africa threatens all Western nations in the 21st century. At 1.1 billion in 2016, Africa screams toward 2.1 billion by 2050 and 4 billion by the end of this century.

As an example, the average Burundian woman births 6.3 children, double the international fertility rate. Burundians expect to jump from 10 million to 20 million in a few decades. Egypt, currently 85 million, expects to reach 105 million by 2030. Ethiopia, at 98 million, expects to double to 210 million by 2060.

Ironically, Egypt imports most of its food to feed its current population in 2016. As the human race adds 1 billion more people, net gain, every 12 years, Africa expects to quadruple its population within 85 years. Africans grow so fast; they cannot water, feed, house, educate or sustain the expected 4 billion people about to land on that continent.

What does it mean? It means that every living creature featuring feathers, hooves, claws, fins or fur that lives in Africa will become food for the human mob. It means relentless extinction of rhinos, lions, gazelles, wildebeest, giraffes and elephants — and, well, just about any creature that breathes.

Nonetheless, the Pope condemns birth control in Africa. Islam promotes as many children as possible as it expands across the globe by birthrate and/or violent jihad. World leaders see the carnage, poverty, disease and futility of Africa in 2016, but fail to call for a world conference to discuss what’s coming and what can be done to change course.

Therefore, those burgeoning populations flood into first world countries with no end to the line.

Question: what will humans do once the planet faces another added three billion people by 2050 — a scant 34 years from now? They will need to be watered, fed, housed, warmed and sustained in a finite world with finite resources? If you think the flood of 1,000,000 (million) refugees knocking on Europe’s door today spells disaster for the civilized West, what do you think any Western country faces in the next 84 years when Africa hits four billion desperate people?

Right now, America annually imports 1.2 million legal refugees from around the world. According to The Center for Immigration Studies with research by Dr. Steven Camarota, the illegal alien flow jumped back to 500,000 illegal alien border crossers in 2014-2015. In other words, the line never ends as Mexico remains on course to add another 20 to 30 million people by mid century.

Somali refugees in Minnesota
Somali refugees in Minnesota: One of every five refugees resettled in Minnesota by the federal government tested positive for latent tuberculosis in 2014, according to the state’s Department of Health

One look at Minneapolis, Minnesota shows 105,000 African Somalian legal refugees now overwhelming welfare services across that city. And that is not all. Now, Somalia at 11.1 million in 2016, expects to reach 13.1 million within six years by 2020:

The country is rapidly expanding with almost 3% annual population growth and a high fertility rate of 6.26 children per woman, which is the 4th highest in the world.

Therefore, the pressure by Somalis to enter the United States will only grow in the next few years. Question to ask yourself and your kids: what is the point of endless immigration from Somalia in 2016 when that country, along with the rest of Africa, refuses to solve its own birth rates? What’s the point of adding more of their people to our country so we become like their country?

How do you think your kids will survive the onslaught? What are you doing to raise a national-international discussion on human overpopulation? What kind of a civilization do you expect to bequeath your children? Answer: if we continue on this path, we will become a new third world country where everyone suffers and no one may lead anything like “quality of life” or a decent standard of living. Not to mention a degrading environment!

None of us will escape the growing consequences of Africa’s population bomb. Here is a video on how non-profit groups in the US are planning to bring thousands of Muslim refugees from the Africa, as well as the Middle East, almost completely funded by the US Government through grants and contracts:

Coming to Europe and North America with the Third World Rivers of blood: Streets of Dhaka turn red after Eid animal sacrifices (PHOTOS, VIDEO)

Posted on by

Coming to Europe and North America with the Third World

Rivers of blood: Streets of Dhaka turn red after Eid animal sacrifices (PHOTOS, VIDEO)

© Amir Hossain
The streets of Dhaka, Bangladesh have turned into ‘rivers of blood’ after floodwaters absorbed the bloody effluent from animal sacrifices marking the Islamic celebration of Eid al-Adha.

Thousands of sheep, goats and cows are slaughtered as part of the annual Muslim holiday marking the end of Dhu al-Hiijah and their meat is traditionally distributed to the poor. However, heavy rain on Tuesday, combined with the city’s poor drainage, has resulted in highly unsanitary conditions.

Images and videos shared online show the shocking scene as residents try to get on with their day-to-day lives despite the bloodied waters around them.

The conditions didn’t stop people from attending mosque and continuing with the sacrifices, according to India Today.

Khandker Millatul Islam, deputy chief waste management official from Dhaka South City Corporation, said that waterlogging has been a problem for a long time and that the corporation was working to resolve the issue.

Citizens have criticized the clean-up efforts of the two city corporations. The agencies in turn accuse residents of using areas close to their homes for sacrifices instead of the locations designated for the religious activity.

The two city corporations designated 1,000 areas – 496 in the north and 504 in the south – for slaughtering animals. However, locals say they were not aware of the selected sacrifice sites as there was not enough done prior to the festival to spread awareness.

READ MORE: 180,000 Muslims celebrate ‘Feast of Sacrifice’ in Moscow (PHOTOS, VIDEO)

“Last year the city corporations launched a mass campaign to encourage people to use the designated spots and that caught our eyes. I went to a spot in Mohammadpur last year, but this year, I don’t even know where the spots actually are,” one resident told The Dhaka Tribune.

Other people pointed out that the chosen spots were too far from their homes.

Eid celebrations began Monday and continue until Thursday. The religious festival is also known as the Feast of Sacrifice and commemorates the Prophet Abraham’s willingness to sacrifice his son to Allah.

 

Yesterday Sung to the tune of the Beatles’ hit song

Posted on by
  Yesterday
Sung to the tune of the Beatles’ hit song

Image result<br />
          for picture of musical notes

Yesterday, all our troubles seemed so far away.
Now it looks like hyper third world immigration is here to stay.
Oh, I believe in yesterday.

Suddenly, this is not half the Canada it used to be.
There’s a shadow of thought control hanging over me.
Oh yesterday, came sudden-ly.

Why Anglo-Celtic Canada had to go away, I don’t know—-politicians wouldn’t say.
I said something politically incorrect so I long for yesterday.

Yesterday, freedom of speech was such an easy game to play.
Now I need a place to hide away, is there a Euro-Canadian ethno-state where I can stay?
Oh, I believe in yesterday.

Why free speech had to go, I don’t know—–the Thought Police wouldn’t say.
I said something Islamophobic, now I long for yesterday, day, yeh yeh.

Yesterday, Euro-Canadian pride and patriotism was such an easy game to play.
Now I need a place to hide away, is your bunker A-OK? Eh?

Oh I believe that European Canada will once again have its day……mmmmmm…..

Tim McCartney Murray
Image result<br />
          for red ensign canada
Anglo-Celtic Canada R.I.P.

Everybody Else Gets Racial Differences Except Equality Addled White Liberals

Posted on by
Everybody Else Gets Racial Differences Except Equality Addled White Liberals
Everybody else in the world understands racial differences and differences in behaviour. The Chinese, especially among themselves, are racially conscious and have a backpack full of choice terms for foreigners. Whites, for instance, are “gwailo” — “pale ghosts. They are underwhelmed by the alleged joys of “diversity”. To suggest to the Chinese that they could use a couple hundred million Africans to improve their diversity and “grow their economy” would be to ask to be consigned to a looney bin.
 
Only equality addled White liberals believe in the equality of the races. This doctrine is foisted on us by the Cultural Marxists and the followers of Coudenhove-Kalergi who want to abolish European nationalities and replace us, via massive Third World immigration, with a new mixed race rootless and easily manipulated and ruled people.
 
A recent tip to passengers on an Air China inflight booklet is a case in point: “Like most seat pocket airplane magazines, Wings of China features anodyne articles, along with tips on cities served by Air China, the country’s flagship state-run airline.But the September issue, dedicated to tourist attractions in London and other well-known British towns, took a sharp detour into an international social media uproar and national embarrassment with some ill-chosen words on safety.

The passage, written in Chinese and English, said tourists should take precautions “when entering areas mainly populated by Indians, Pakistanis and black people.” It added: ‘We advise tourists not to go out alone at night, and females always to be accompanied by another person when traveling.'” (New York Times, September 7, 2016)

The advice was sound and sensible and based on racial reality.

An article in a recent issue of Wings of China, an Air China in-flight magazine, has drawn criticism as being racist. CreditKim Kyung-Hoon/Reuters

There was the predictable outrage over the Twittersphere. Equally predictably  was a swift Air China apology for “inappropriate expressions”, not for inaccuracy. Basically, they had got caught out telling the truth, truths which cannot be told in Western nations enchained in a dopey ideology of equality.”Air China was quick to apologize, saying on Twitter that it did ‘not condone discrimination in any shape or form’  and that copies of the magazine were being removed from all flights. Joyce Zhang, a spokeswoman for Air China in Beijing, said in an statement on Thursday that the article in Wings of China contained ‘inappropriate expressions’ and that in general its articles did not represent the opinions of Air China. The magazine apologized as well, blaming an ‘editing error’ for the travel warning.”

Apologies are always comical. The advice appeared in an Air China publication, How could it not represent their views? If not, whose views? British Airways. An “editing error”? No, it wasn’t a misplaced adjective or the failure to use a comma. It was the factual content which, quite sensibly, Air China refused to disown.

Advice to McCallum : It’s Time to Go Back To School

Posted on by

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Advice to McCallum : It’s Time to Go Back To School

OUR ADVICE TO IMMIGRATION MINISTER MCCALLUM : IT’S TIME TO GO BACK TO SCHOOL AND STAY AWAY FROM THE IMMIGRATION LOBBY

 

Immigration Minister John McCallum’s has been musing that he will increase Canada’s immigration intake well above 300,000 for 2017. The two reasons he gives are clearly not evidence-based and should be thrown into the nearest recycling bin.

 

REASON A : He says Canada needs immigrants because it has an aging population. He does not seem to know that the Mulroney government asked Canada’s Department of Health and Welfare to study this issue. It was to determine whether Canada should use immigration to solve problems that might arise because of Canada’s aging population (particularly a drain on Canada’s finances). Health and Welfare Department’s long study around 1990  concluded that Canada would be better off  to use its own population (particularly its females who were not in the workforce and its unemployed older males) to solve such issues. Doing this would stabilize the number of people that each worker supported at 1.9 (Canada’s Dependency Ratio). Increasing immigration to as high as 600,000 per year would have little effect on reducing the percentage of older people in Canada’s population.

 

McCallum also does not seem to know that a CD Howe Institute study in 2006 on the same issue concluded that “… no conceivable amount of immigration, with an age profile such as Canada currently experiences, can significantly affect the coming shift in the ratio of older to working age Canadians.” It predicted that Canada’s percentage of older Canadians (now around 17%) would rise to 46% of the population by 2050. It looked at three strategies : (1) reducing the percentage of older people through high immigration (2) stabilizing the percentage of older people so that a much smaller percentage of Canada’s population would be 65+ in 2050. One of the very negative results of using high immigration would be that Canada’s population would rise to 169 million by 2050 and its yearly intake would be 7 million !!! Such consequences would clearly negate any benefits.

 

The third strategy it proposed was to increase Canada’s retirement age to 70. This technique did not use immigration to achieve its end, and would be superior to the other two strategies. By 2050, the maximum percentage of aged Canadians potentially dependent on government programmes would be about 33%, not 50%. Researchers pointed out that simultaneous policies aimed at encouraging work and saving were also important. Saving, in particular, would decrease reliance on public coffers. The Harper government did suggest raising the retirement age. This proposal has to be re-visited

 

REASON B : McCallum is also saying that Canada has a labour shortage and that Canada needs much higher immigration. He claims to have consulted with about 35 groups across the country. Recently, in Alberta where about 100,000 people have lost their jobs in the past two years because of the downturn in Alberta’s oil industry, he stated that Albertans were telling him that Alberta needed more immigrants. The question that most Albertans are asking is this : Who is McCallum listening to? Other Canadians are asking the same thing.  It seems that the only people he is talking to are members of the immigration lobby (lawyers, consultants, advocates and ethnic groups like the Sikhs, Muslims and Chinese). In fact, he has been proposing that Canada accept many more Chinese students and workers. To accomplish that, he wants to dramatically increase the number of Canada’s visa-granting centres in China. Anyone who has seen what unnecessary immigration has done to Canada in the past 25 years must be cringing or  saying that they would prefer an Ebola epidemic.

 

And they are not the only ones !!! Two of Canada’s big banks (Toronto Dominion and the Bank of Montreal) did their own studies three years ago on whether Canada had a labour shortage. Both concluded that it did not. The point is that the banks are precisely the ones we would expect to be cheer-leading higher immigration. But the TD Bank stated “With data in hand, we debunk the notion that Canada is facing an imminent skills crisis.”  Overall, both said that whatever skill shortages existed, were isolated and likely no greater than existed a decade ago. In addition, the Parliamentary Budget Officer in 2014 reported that there was little evidence to suggest that a labour shortage exists.

 

Clearly, Canada’s Immigration Minister John McCallum has not done his homework and he has no evidence to support his proposal to greatly increase Canada’s immigration intake. Our advice : Raising immigration intake to 300,000 for 2016 was already a bad mistake. Don’t make another.

 

IT’S TIME TO GO BACK TO SCHOOL AND STAY AWAY FROM THE IMMIGRATION LOBBY.   

For sensible immigration policies for the 21st century.

So what if I am a Racist?

Posted on by

So what if I am a Racist?

by Tim Murray

Burnaby, BC – real estate density to accommodate massive Asian immigration
There are many in the environmental movement who have chosen to take the coward’s way out. They know that population growth plays a crucial role in environmental degradation. And they know that in the United States, Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom it is immigration which drives population growth and that it will play an even more decisive role in the future.
But they have chosen to take the Fifth Amendment. They have chosen to remain silent and look the other way, focusing instead on campaigns to reduce consumption, promote renewable technologies, greener lifestyles and sideshows to defend this or that threatened habitat, forest or species. By Mark Twain’s definition, they are liars of the silent kind. They know in their hearts thatimmigration-driven population growth has a profoundly negative ecological impact, but they say nothing. This is ethically equivalent to knowing that someone has planted a bomb in the subway and not saying anything to the police.

Then there are the environmentalists who not only tell the silent lie, but are determined to silence those brave enough to tell the truth. Many of them draw salaries from “green” NGOs whose primary goal is to maintain and grow their bureaucracy. Cynics can be forgiven for regarding them as essentially fund-raising tools which not only solicit donations from credulous innocents, but from corporations seeking ecological dispensation and good publicity. These organizations are case studies of Roberto Michels’ “Iron Law of Oligarchy”. Success transforms fledgling grass roots movements into organizations with salaried staff and directors with a vested interest in the financial viability of their employer. Consequently they will pursue goals to promote the maintenance and growth of the organization even when those goals run counter to the original aims of the movement. Green crusaders become money-grubbing corporate lackeys.

If this wasn’t morally reprehensible enough, some go further. They enlist the services of the Merchants of Smear, like the Southern Poverty Law Center, or the Center for New Community. Hired guns whose mission is to destroy reputations, especially the reputations of environmentalists who campaign for population stabilization.

And finally there is another category of population deniers — those who choose the path of least resistance. Those who are terrified of being found guilty of guilt-by-association. So they distance themselves from sustainable population campaigners to avoid being tarred with an ugly brush.

They do so for fear of the “R” word. Racism. A word that is seldom precisely defined, but always brandished as a weapon of fear and intimidation to shut down debate. It permanently marks the accused with a stain that can never be removed. Ask the widowed husband of the late June Callwood, a famous Canadian journalist who championed progressive causes. Unjustly smeared by an identity group, she spent the remainder of final years a broken woman. To be labeled “racist” and have it stick is professional suicide and the death knell of one’s credibility, no matter how broad and sound one’s perspective may be.

Vancouver, BC, real estate development to accommodate massive Asian immigration

In Canada, more so than in America, Australia or Britain, such is the cult status of mass immigration that to challenge any facet of it is thought in most quarters to be intrinsically “racist”. Mass immigration and the deification of the immigrant is part of the national DNA. As we witnessed in the Republican Primary contest, political candidates love to trot out rags-to-riches, immigrant-makes good stories of how their father came to this country a humble, hard-working man of meagre means and saw his son rise to achieve the American dream. Democratic Presidential nominee candidate Bernie Sanders hit that key too. Many times.

Canadian politicians pull the same emotional string. And it works. It all lends credence to the false narrative that Canada is a nation of immigrants, that immigrants “built this country”, and must continue to build it. The idea that Canada is “over-built”, that we have exceeded our ecological carrying capacity, is inconceivable. It is not on the table — and the growth lobby, in collusion with the media cartel — is determined to keep it there. Obviously, the useful idiots of the Left are party to the plot. Conveniently forgotten is the fact that the working man or woman’s best friend is a tight labour market. But then the Left no longer is no longer the advocate of the working class, but the champion of identity groups and migrant rights. “No One is Illegal” is a slogan born to serve the corporate bottom line.

So how does racism come into the conversation? It’s like this. If you are drawing a third of a million people into your country every year and most of them are from “non-traditional” sources, then most of them — an overwhelming number of them — are going have a skin pigment other than white. Therefore, to propose any restriction, or God forbid, a moratorium on immigration for any reason, is “racist”, and the one making the proposal is a “racist” who automatically is beyond the pale of polite discussion and deserves to be consigned to oblivion. He certainly will never see the inside of a CBC studio.

Well, I’m an environmentalist and I have chosen to make a lot of noise about immigration. In doing so, as one could predict, I am just about as popular as flatulence in an elevator. I talk loudly about the ugly “I” word because I would rather be right than politically correct. I know that if we grow our population by 18% we can’t expect to cut our GHG emissions by 3%. It can’t be done. And I know that if we have covered 20% of our Class 1 farmland in sprawl with this kind of growth that we haven’t a hope of feeding ourselves if immigration rates persist and affordable oil runs out.

Greenfield acreage cannot be adequately preserved by land-use planning (ask Portland, Oregon). We have the highest growth of any G7 country and with Australia, the highest per capita immigration intake in the world. Biodiversity is on the ropes, especially in the killing zones on the perimeter of our bursting cities. It cannot coexist with the tens of millions of extra consumers that Ottawa plans to import in coming years.

In advocating an immigration moratorium, I find myself in the same predicament I did while working in a theatre in a largely Chinese Vancouver neighbourhood. The movies were often times so popular that there were more people waiting on the sidewalk to get in than there were seats available to sell to them. One of my unhappy duties was to close the door when the theatre was full.

Canada is such a theatre. It has a limited carrying capacity, not established by a fire marshal, but by ecologists and biologists who have offered educated guesses as what it might be. Now a theatre manager or owner might propose that more people be admitted off the street and be accommodated as standing-room patrons. He may even propose that newcomers sit on the laps of those already seated. Taking a cue from fake greens, he might even call it “smart growth” or “eco-density” — but.his motive would be purely mercenary.

Similarly, an economist from the Royal Bank would argue that Canada could admit millions, tens of millions more, and the Real Estate Industry would echo his sentiments. Again for commercial considerations. But neither the theatre owner or nor the economist is governed by the concept of limiting factors, of carrying capacity. Just as it takes a fire marshal to impose reality on the theatre owner, it would take an ecologist or a biologist to introduce the Canadian government to the reality of biophysical limits.

One might recall when, in the face of dwindling stocks, the politicians of Newfoundland protested that the cod fishery must continue because the “economy” of the province depended on it. So the boats went out until the cod ran out. Ultimately the issue was not about what the economy of Newfoundland required, but what the cod stocks could sustain — and in this case, they obviously couldn’t sustain any more fishing. That economist from the Royal Bank, and any number of federal politicians, will protest that our “economy” requires these massive annual injections of immigrants, but our environment will simply not continue to sustain it.

At some point, we will have to establish as a nation, a population plan, an optimum population for this country. When we do, someone will have to close the theatre door. Now, I would put it to my critics, when I closed that door was I “racist” in doing so because 75% of the people left standing outside were of Chinese ancestry?

Ecological Vancouver before Asian Immigration-Invasion

Let me ask another question, suppose I was. Suppose I closed the door for two reasons. One, because the theatre had filled its seating (carrying) capacity and for safety reasons it would be dangerous to allow more people in. And two, because I didn’t like Chinese people. Would the second reason invalidate the first reason? Should the revelation that I am a mean-spirited, nasty, hateful guy who hates children, kittens and little old ladies discredit my argument that the theatre is full?

I want to see the development of a Sustainable Population Plan for Canada, one that would factor in the variables of net migration, births over deaths and refugee quotas. The imperative would be to stay faithful to the desired population target by adjusting any of those variables up or down.

The goal would be to stop biodiversity loss and save biodiversity services. Stop the diminution of farm acreage and wildlife habitat, and meet carbon-emission targets.

But there is another reason for my opposition to hyper-immigration. The one I keep in the closet. I hate right-handed people. I hate the way they have treated me and organized the world for their convenience. Right-handed people make up 90% of the global population. By cutting back on immigration by 90% I know that most of the excluded people will be right-handed. Does this hidden agenda invalidate my previous arguments?

In Canada of late there seems to be a great pre-occupation not with an idea or an action but the alleged motivation behind it. The hate-crimes laws are a case in point. Their logic confounds me. Someone hits me over the head and leaves me with a concussion because he thinks I have a wallet full of cash, and the judge gives him a year. If the same thug hits me over the head and leaves me with a concussion because he thinks I’m gay, the judge gives him a much heavier penalty. Whatever the moron’s motives, my medical condition is the same.

But such is the political culture of Canada. My “motive” for anti-immigration views warrants more scrutiny and attention than the views themselves. I could only wish that critics would take my arguments on their own merits rather than subjecting me to psychoanalysis. And I wish that the network that I pay for, the state broadcaster, the CBC, would entertain the possibility that today’s heresy might become tomorrow’s truth.

Posted on by

UNDERSTANDING THE INVASION OF EUROPE… THE COUDENHOVE-KALERGI PLAN…

In this article, Paul Fromm, free speech warrior, explores the reality of mass non-White Immigration, its role in the steady march towards the extermination of White Europeans, and its underlying causes…

Mass immigration, in the form of a flood of “refugees”, is transforming the White or European world. Open door immigration policies dating back to 1965 mean that, by 2041, the European founding/settler people of the U.S. will become a minority. They were 90 per cent of the U.S. when John F. Kennedy was elected in 1960. People of European ancestry are now just 61 per cent.  Canada will become majority non-White by 2050.

Crowded Train in Pakistan. Our Zionist occupied governments intend to bring this train ride to hell right to our front door.. Photo/Khalid Tanveer)

In both cases, the replacement of the European founding/settler people came about by public policy. Yet, this policy of ethnic replacement or ethnic cleansing on the installment plan is almost never discussed let alone debated politically.

Part of the ecstatic applause and enthusiasm that have greeted Donald Trump is his willingness to tackle at least part of the immigration issue. Many White Americans know that their country is being changed out from under them. Their neighbourhoods have been made “diverse” through mass immigration; their town’s main street  has been hollowed out, and much business moved to a WalMart super store stuffed with cheap Chinese imports; and many of their decent paying jobs have been outsourced to China or Mexico or Vietnam. And all the while, campuses and much of the mass media blare accusations that they, Whites, are the cause of most of America’s problems. They, the victims of minority-preference “affirmative action”,  are derided for White Privilege.

Illustrator N.C. Wyeth brings to life the beauty and heroism of the early settlers.

Samuel Francis, a close adviser to Pat Buchanan, a former staffer to North Carolina Senator John East, and writer for Chronicles, 20 years ago urged the abandonment of “conservatism” and the embrace of racial nationalism. Mainstream Republicans, focused narrowly on money, and Democrats, wildly courting anti-White minorities, had both abandoned White working Americans. Both welcomed the demographic invasion by the Third World, which, by 2041, will render the European founding/settler people a minority in the land they built. The Republicans rubbed their hands with glee at the thought of cheap labour — legal or illegal. The Democrats rejoiced in the replacement of Whites, whom they detest.

Forcing White Europeans to pay for the children of other races is one means of making sure they will not have money and time to have and care for children of their own.

Samuel Francis wrote:

Middle American forces, emerging from the ruins of the old independent middle and working classes, found conservative, libertarian, and pro-business Republican ideology and rhetoric irrelevant, distasteful, and even threatening to their own socioeconomic interests. The post Second World War Middle Class was, in reality, an affluent proletariat, economically dependent on the federal government through labor codes, housing loans, educational programmes, defence contracts and health, and unemployment benefits. All variations of conservative doctrine rejected these. … Yet, at the same time, the Ruling Class proved unable to uproot the social, cultural, and national identities and loyalties of the Middle American proletariat, and Middle Americans found themselves increasingly alienated from the political left, and its embrace of anti-national policies, and counter-cultural manners and morals.

“Black lives matter,” they are told, but it is Whites who are overwhelmingly the victims of inter-racial crime.

Black and other non White violent crimes against Whites, and in particular against White European women and children, occur at such high rates that this too can be considered a form of genocide.

In late August, 2016 at a White House gathering, “White House Summit on Countering Violent Extremism” Vice-President Joe Biden hailed the swift replacement of America’s European founding/settler people as a “strength”, as a good thing. Even an amoeba fights for its own survival, but Biden enthused and hailed…

….an unrelenting stream of immigration; non-stop, non-stop. Folks like me who are Caucasian, of European descent, for the first time in 2017 will be in an absolute minority in the United States of America, absolute minority. Fewer than fifty percent of the people in America, from then on will be white, European stock. That’s not a bad thing. That’s a source of our strength.

 

He is technically wrong: Whites are not yet a minority. However, his enthusiasm for the replacement of his own people, and his insistence that it is inevitable speaks to the moral depravity and mental illness of our ruling class.

The past year has seen the wholesale invasion of Europe by Third Worlders, variously described as “refugees” or  “migrants”.  Unlike the emaciated, bedraggled refugees of yesteryear, these are mostly robust young men, well dressed and chattering on their cellphones. They have the money to pay greedy gangsters and people smugglers. By boat or by land, they surge into hapless, overwhelmed Greece, and arrogantly battle with police and try to force their way north to the handout capitals of Europe – Germany and Sweden.

Able bodied "refugees" almost all adult males in perfect health and with the most up-to-date electronic devices. Not refugees at all, but an army meant to use, destroy, and replace Europeans.

Last year, Germany accepted over a million Third World migrants who promptly paid  back the long-suffering German taxpayers, who must pony up over $13,500 to support each migrant, by the mass assault and rape of German and other European women during New Year’s public gatherings in Cologne, Hamburg, Vienna, Salzburg, and Stockholm. The police tried to downplay the fact that the attackers were organized Moslems. The press too initially joined the cover-up. However, the social media – cellphones, You Tube, Twitter, e-mail – allowed scenes of assaults to go viral. There were reports of Germans being expelled from their apartments to make room for the invaders. Other You Tube videos showed Moslems molesting bathers, male and female, at public pools and defecating in the water. Children have also been molested in public swimming pools, and this situation is ongoing.

How amusing that the hand about to grab the woman is White. The Zionist occupied government of Germany has created a website encouraging non White "refugees" to have sex with White women, and White men to have sex with non White women and featuring drawings of just that.

Yet, according to most of the media, the villains were the “extreme Right” who protested the outrages of the unwanted “guests”. Police visited outspoken critics of the invasion who had posted their views on Facebook, threatening them with the loss of their jobs, and even the loss of their children. Why would European leadership be so unable and unwilling to deal with the invasion? How do we make sense of German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s decision to welcome over a million largely unassimilatable Third Worlders at a time when there are no jobs for them. Germany, the best off country in Europe, still has over 6 per cent unemployment.

invade Germany and racially replace Europeans<strong><em> may</em></strong> be connected... All non European mass immigration initiatives to overwhelm European nations <a href="http://odinist.org/cultural-destruction-assault-death-extinction-us-preservation-people-national-character/">are being promoted by Jews</a>.

Merkel is a former communist. Then known as Angela Kasner, she was propaganda secretary in the Young Communist League. She may have shed her economic communism, but remains a dedicated cultural Marxist. She is militantly anti-nationalist. Her immigration policy will help displace or replace the German people. The ideas behind the European Union were not a benign move toward more economic co-operation, peaceful coexistence, and a breaking down of barriers.

The evil genius behind the European Union is Count Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi (1894-1972), son of an Austro-Hungarian diplomat and a Japanese upper class woman. In 1922, he founded the Pan European Movement. He quickly attracted leftist support and money. Early supporters of his ideas included Sigmund Freud and Albert Einstein, and leftist politicians like Thomas Masaryk and Edvard Benes of Czechoslovakia; Ignaz Seipel and Karl Renner of Austria; and Aristide Briand and Leon Blum of France.

In 1924, German banker Max Warburg gave him a war chest of 60,000 gold marks. In 1925, Coudenhove-Kalergi travelled to the U.S. and lined up more funding from financiers Paul Warburg and Bernard Baruch. In the ‘30s and war years, the European Union movement became dormant.

Mixing out a race is not "diversity", but genocide.

After the war, Coudenhove-Kalergi attracted support for his idea from Winston Churchill, B’nai Brith and theNew York Times. In 1947, Coudenhove-Kalergi became General Secretary of the European Parliamentary Union.

The Europe of the future, for Coudenhove-Kalergi, would no longer have independent countries;  it would no longer even have distinct nationalities. The New European would be a mixed raced individual. In his blueprint for this genocidal nightmare, Praktischer Idealismus (Practical Idealism), he describes the new European:

The New Europeans?

The man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-negroid race of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples and the diversity of individuals.”  And Jews will  be the spiritual nobility of Europe.

His father had written a book denouncing anti-Semitism and had been a close friend of Theodore Herzl, the founder of Zionism. Coudenhove-Kalergi’s first romantic encounter had been with the future actress Ida Roland, who was JewishMass Third World immigration would be the means to changing the make-up of Europe’s population by replacing Europeans, leading to the race-mixing that would produce the rootless population of Coudenhove-Kalergi’s dream.

This would be improvement...

Very significant, according to Coudenhove-Kalergi himself, was the Jewish backing for his intensely anti-nationalist plans. “At the beginning of 1924”, he wrote, “we received a call from Baron Louis de Rothschild; one of his friends, Max Warburg from Hamburg had read my book and wanted to get to know us. … Warburg generously offered 60,000 gold marks to tide the movement over its first three years. Max Warburg, who was one of the most distinguished and wisest men I have ever come into contact with, had a principle of financing these movements. He remained sincerely interested in Pan-Europe for his entire life. Max Warburg arranged my 1925 trip to the United States to introduce me to Paul Warburg and financier Bernard Baruch”. Jewish, as well, it might be noted.

Affirmative Action.. REAL Bias masked as "anti-racism".

German Chancellor Angela Merkel is an ideological daughter of Coudenhove-Kalergi.  In fact, in 2010, she was the recipient of the Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize. For her, the hordes of “migrants” presented not a challenge or threat, but a golden opportunity to bring more Third Worlders into Germany, which has a below-replacement birth rate. Many of the African and Middle Easterners have families of 5, 6, or 7 children.

Mrs. Merkel made a telling comment, in 2004, when Carl-Eduard Graf von Bismarck, great-grandson of Count Otto von Bismarck, married a Canadian Jew, Nathalie Berman. “You two have united history … the next Prince of Bismarck will be a mix of both religions, ”  she told the couple. Actually, she’s wrong. Judaism is passed on through the mother, and the children will not be a “mix”, but will, in fact, be Jewish.

While he is actually involved in carrying out a genocide of native Germanic people in Germany, Sigmar Gabriel makes impassioned statements such as this one about invented dangers to Jews, waxing lyrical and emoting about the Self Chosen to justify other Jewish led genocides in the Middle East for the purpose of Jewish land grabbing.

A ideological son of the vile White-hating Coudenhove-Kalergi is Merkel’s sidekick, Vice Chancellor and Leader of the Social Democratic Party, Sigmar Gabriel. He recently lost his temper and tossed the finger at young anti-immigration protesters in Salzgitter. He threw them the finger because the protesters alluded to his father’s past. Gabriel’s Father, Walter Gabriel, remained a staunch Nationalist up until his death in 2012, criticizing his own son for being hopelessly indoctrinated, and his socialist party as harmful to Germany.

Stung by the healthy rejection by many Germans of being replaced by Third World hordes, Gabriel  has called for the jailing of anybody protesting uncontrolled mass immigration. He refers to nationalists as “lowlife scum, unworthy of being called German” and implied that any refugee is more German than a nationalist could ever be. He frequently refers to Europe as the “United States of Europe”, considers Germany a country of immigration, openly calls for abolishing national borders, advertises in favour of giving anybody dual citizenship, and wastes no opportunity to express his contempt for his home country.

 

By Paul Fromm

(Photos and captions by Odinia)

Paul Fromm is the Director of the Canada First Immigration Reform Committee.

Increase in Chinese Immigration: McCallum’s Latest Scheme to Replace Canada’s Founding/Settler People — Brian Ruhe Interviews Paul Fromm

Posted on by
Increase in Chinese Immigration: McCallum’s Latest Scheme to Replace Canada’s Founding/Settler People — Brian Ruhe Interviews Paul Fromm
 
 
Inline image 1
 
 
The Canada First Immigration Reform Committee publishes a monthly newsletter, The Canadian Immigration Hotline. A subscription is $30.00. For a sample copy, write us or e-mail us. My e-mail is paul@paulfromm.com
 
Our mailing address is CFIRC, P.O. Box 332, Rexdale, ON., M9W 5L3, CANADA.