Posted on by
Beijing’s Trojan Horse Rolls Into Canada: A National-Security Scholar Warns Carney’s Chinese EV Deal Embeds Sabotage Risk in the Country’s Roads, Ports and Grids

OTTAWA — China keeps finding inventive ways to burrow into the West, and Canada’s new appetite for Chinese electric vehicles may be the most consequential opening yet.That is the warning at the center of a report published this week by the Macdonald-Laurier Institute and written by Brenda Shaffer, an energy and national-security specialist who teaches at the United States Naval Postgraduate School. China, she writes, “continues to find creative ways to infiltrate and influence the West,” embedding in its exports the capacity to surveil citizens, disrupt transportation and ports, and trigger blackouts and grid damage.Shaffer situates the electric-vehicle question inside a wider argument about hybrid warfare. China, Russia and Iran, she notes, have each written attacks on Western domestic energy infrastructure into their war doctrines, erasing the old line between the home front and the battlefield. Even brief disruptions to electricity or transit, she argues, could spread public panic and erode support for a distant conflict — the defense of Taiwan being the obvious test.The cars began arriving in June, the product of a strategic partnership Prime Minister Mark Carney signed in Beijing in January. Ottawa cut its tariff on Chinese electric vehicles from 100 percent to 6.1 percent, opening an initial quota of roughly 49,000 vehicles in the first year. Carney has cast the imports as a low-cost route for Canadians switching to electric, and analysts cited by Shaffer expect Chinese brands to capture a fifth of the Canadian market.Shaffer leans on an internal Public Safety Canada memo, obtained under access-to-information law, warning that opening the market to “high-risk vendors” invites connected cars that “collect significant amounts of data on Canadians, which can have intelligence value.” Her account of the official response is withering. Asked how Canada would protect drivers, the chief of the defense staff, General Jennie Carignan, told reporters only that “we don’t have a lot of Chinese vehicles so far,” and Defense Minister David McGuinty said he would raise the question with base commanders.The danger, in her telling, runs well past cars. A congressional probe found hidden communications equipment inside Chinese-made cranes at major American ports; the same cranes are common in Canadian harbors, where Transport Canada began assessing the risk in 2023. More worrying still are solar power inverters — the devices that feed renewable energy into the grid — of which China supplies about 70 percent worldwide. American investigators have identified undeclared communication components inside some Chinese inverters that experts warn could be used to switch them off remotely and destabilize power grids. Lithuania has banned Chinese inverters outright and the European Union has moved to bar them from public funding, while Canada, Shaffer writes, has imposed no comparable limits — even as the January partnership commits Ottawa and Beijing to deepen cooperation on solar, wind and battery storage.Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre’s auto policy would prohibit Chinese-made vehicles from proximity to Canadian Forces bases and other sensitive or strategic infrastructure. In Washington, where opposition to Chinese electric vehicles is one of the few genuinely bipartisan positions, President Donald Trump has called the deal a disaster for Canada, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said Canada would live to regret it, and the U.S. ambassador, Peter Hoekstra, vowed the cars would never reach American roads: “We’re not going to open the floodgates to have Chinese cars coming into the US from Canada.”Shaffer’s alarm is echoed, from a different vantage, by Michael Kovrig, the former Canadian diplomat held in China for more than 1,000 days. In testimony to Parliament this spring, Kovrig described the deal as a “trifecta of risks” — structural dependence, unfair competition that erodes industrial capacity, and systemic pressure on government policy — and warned that the People’s Republic “weaponizes technology, supply chains and market access” to force acquiescence to its agenda.Commenting this week on his own testimony, Kovrig wrote on social media that opening Canada’s market to Chinese electric vehicles “should be assessed not as a normal trade agreement, but as a tactical gamble that risks deep entanglement.” The Chinese Communist Party, he wrote, “pours enormous resources into the sector to build scale and sustain overcapacity.” He went on: “The pattern is to flood, consolidate and weaponize. We’ve seen China do this before with solar panels, steel, ships and drones, and EVs are now moving through the same stages in global markets.”The warnings have not slowed Carney’s government, which is pressing ahead at full speed. Industry Minister Mélanie Joly spent much of last week in China, courting BYD, Chery, Geely and Shanghai Launch Automotive Technology to build electric vehicles on Canadian soil, and confirmed that the import quota will keep climbing — rising by 6.5 percent a year from 49,000 vehicles in 2026 to roughly 67,000 annually by 2031. Carney, caught on a hot microphone with Trump at the Group of Seven summit in France, defended the arrangement as “less than 3 per cent of our market, 49,000 cars,” telling the president, “It’s a cap, we capped, a hard line.”Beijing is pleased.Geely Holding Group’s Lotus-brand electric vehicles will reach Canada next month — the first such models sold under the 49,000-vehicle quota — China’s ambassador to Canada, Wang Di, told Reuters on Friday. The cars would arrive, he said, “and they will be holding a ceremony when the cars are delivered in Montreal,” a milestone in the trade pivot Carney has pursued to move Canada away from dependence on the United States.On June 26, the Chinese Communist Party’s state-run China Daily approvingly reported Canada’s pledge to lift its exports to China by 50 percent by 2030. At a Canada Day reception at the Canadian embassy in Beijing, the mission’s chargé d’affaires, Mark Richardson, called Canada “a stable, reliable partner — a partner that builds and values relationships for the long term,” adding, “That includes with China.” Of Carney’s January visit, he said: “To say this has been a significant year for Canada–China relations would be an understatement. In many ways, it has been a turning point.” He noted that Canada had become a major energy exporter to China and observed that “the first shipment of Chinese-made electric vehicles has arrived in Canada under a new quota that was agreed in January.” Disclosure: The author appeared on a panel at the Hudson Institute in May, convened by senior fellow Michael Doran, alongside research fellow Zineb Riboua and Professor Brenda Shaffer, whose Macdonald-Laurier Institute commentary is discussed in this report.
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more
 
READ IN APP
 

DR. FAUCI & COVID EXPOSED:Enough to Hang Him

Posted on by

Enough to Hang Him
by Earl P. Holt III
To her eternal credit, in her final days in office, Director of National
Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard released conclusive evidence of Anthony
Fauci’s countless crimes committed as COVID commissar. Gabbard
provided evidence proving that Fauci funded the research at the
Wuhan Lab, he engaged in a massive, government-wide cover-up of
that crime, he censored and threatened the dissenting voices of
honest experts, and he perjured himself before Congress multiple
times. Below is one of two articles I wrote on this subject several
years ago.
I’ve got a theory, but unlike Marxist Theory, it’s based on evidence
rather than ideology, and therefore amenable to change in light of
contradictory evidence. My theory explains all the currently available
evidence better than any other of which I’m aware, and it seems
eminently plausible. In fact, it is exactly the sort of scheme in which
“Democrats” and other communists would engage.
Trump was the first prominent American to publicly denounce China for
its dishonest and corrupt trade practices, a 20-year crusade that
definitely contributed to his being elected president. China had been
eating our lunch for decades, but no one besides Trump had the guts to
call out China because so many in our political class and donor class are
heavily invested in Chinese firms and in U.S. firms doing business there.
Trump correctly pointed out what serious people already knew but
didn’t dare to say: China has manipulated its currency to discourage
imports from America, thereby generating $500 Billion in annual trade
surpluses to benefit itself. It has also stolen $500 Billion per year in
proprietary technology (trade secrets) from U.S. firms as a
precondition for their doing business there. Using these stolen

technologies, China has often reverse-engineered American products
and competed with these same American firms in international
markets.
Trump was the first president who attempted to hold China
accountable for its illegal trade practices, all of which violated the many
promises China agreed to when seeking Most Favored Nation trade
status with the U.S. and admission to the World Trade Organization.
Its windfalls from illegal trade helped fund China’s massive military
buildup. In retaliation for those trade practices, Trump imposed tariffs
on Chinese imports that totaled tens of billions of dollars in revenue for
several years during his first presidency.

Unmerited Privileges for Communist China

The Trump economy was soon roaring along at just under four percent
GDP growth by late 2019, fueled by Trump’s significant deregulation of
the U.S. economy and sweeping federal income tax reductions to
benefit the middle-class. Many “rust-belt” industries, like small steel
foundries, even began to make recoveries after being given Last Rights
by the Obama Administration.
Facing four more years of Trump’s tariffs on their exports and Trump’s
loud denunciations of China as an international pariah, China’s leaders

came up with a plan to damage Trump’s re-election prospects by
sabotaging the Trump economy. They intentionally unleashed the
COVID pandemic on the world, knowing it would quickly infect the
U.S. because of the immense volume of human and commercial traffic
between our two nations. They also recognized that certain quisling
Americans would help obscure COVID’s origins because they had
illegally participated in its funding.
China’s leaders knew they could also rely on the World Health
Organization’s (WHO) Director-General to lie and alibi for them,
because it was China’s power and influence that initially got him his
position at the WHO. Indeed, it was Director-General (and Ethiopian
communist) Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus who has publicly parroted
China’s disinformation efforts to this day, claiming that COVID
originated in Wuhan’s “wet markets” rather than China’s Level 4
Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV.) (Like the commie he is, he has
privately conceded that COVID was engineered at the WIV.)
U.S. public health officials like Anthony Fauci at the National Institute
for Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) treasonously repeated
such disinformation from the WHO and China, causing the U.S. to lose
valuable time responding to the pandemic. Fauci and the NIAID were in
a very difficult position from the start, since Fauci had helped fund the
Wuhan Institute of Virology’s “gain of function” research that China’s
military used to convert an innocuous and naturally-occurring bat virus
into a pandemic that killed more than one million Americans, and seven
million more citizens, worldwide.
Once the pandemic arrived in America, the New Communist Party of
the USA (NCPUSA) — misleadingly called “Democrats” — did what they
always do by rushing to exploit any tragedy for their own political gain.
They immediately exaggerated COVID’s true transmissibility and
virulence in order to generate panic among weak-minded Americans,
and then began to seize control of American institutions in BLUE areas

by using public health measures as their rationale. They soon mandated
masks, lockdowns of businesses in BLUE areas, and mandatory
vaccinations for public employees, air passengers, the military, and
employees of firms doing business with the federal government.

Perhaps the most egregious power seized by the NCPUSA was the
dubious authority to mass-mail ballots for the 2020 Presidential
Election in “swing states.” This produced untold millions of fraudulent
votes in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Minnesota, Pennsylvania and
Wisconsin. According to the documentary 2000 Mules, it reversed the
legitimate outcome of the election in each of those six states, and stole
the 2020 election from Donald Trump exactly as he complained.
By stealing the election from Trump, China and the NCPUSA rid
themselves of their greatest opposition and the primary impediment
to their further accumulation of power. RINOs doing the bidding of
their masters in the “donor class” were already lining up with the
NCPUSA to try to end Trump’s tariffs on Chinese imports. Stealing the
election from Trump also allowed the NCPUSA to dodge a bullet,
because eight years of Trump would probably have relegated
“Democrats” to the kind of obscurity enjoyed by the Flat Earth

Society. By stealing the election, all of Trump’s enemies won and only
the American People lost.
Anthony Fauci’s treasonous complicity in illegally funding the Chinese
military’s Virologic Warfare Program at the Wuhan Lab — with several
millions of dollars in grants over many years — was no longer of interest
to the NCPUSA after it gained a majority in both Houses of Congress
through its 2020 voter fraud. Fauci’s frequent commissions of perjury
before Congress were soon forgiven as well, and he would NEVER be
held accountable for helping to illegally fund COVID’s gain of function
research. Nor would he be held to account for the terrible advice he
intentionally gave President Trump in an attempt to sabotage Trump’s
presidency.
The WHO was once again free to continue its pursuit of one-world
government, just as it’s now doing with the International Treaty on
Pandemic Prevention and Preparedness. This treaty authorizes the
Director-General of the WHO — that Ethiopian communist who
repeatedly lied to the world about the ChinaVirus — to define what an
“international public health emergency” is, and override U.S. laws and
the Constitution in order to deal with such an event. By the way, the
WHO considers “climate change” and Third World poverty to be
“international public health emergencies.”

WHO Logo & Its Chinese Stooge Director

Several times on my favorite cable TV show, The First 48, veteran
homicide detectives have made the point that when you look closely at
the true culprit of a homicide, all the available evidence suddenly
begins to fit together neatly, like a puzzle. The same is rarely true of
any other suspect or “person-of-interest.” My theory — that China
unleashed the COVID pandemic to damage Trump’s re-election
prospects and end U.S. tariffs on Chinese exports to America — neatly
fits this puzzle analogy.
The only unresolved question in my mind is whether the NCPUSA
collaborated with China to help orchestrate the COVID pandemic.
Based on experience, my guess is that it did…

It Was Never About Hate

Posted on by

It Was Never About Hate

Category: Uncategorized | Tags:

CANADA: NOT STOLEN

Posted on by
Category: Uncategorized

The Reproduction Challenge

Posted on by

Indian Minister Offers 60-Million Indians to Canada: KEEP THEM IN INDIA AND “MAKE INDIA GREAT AGAIN”

Posted on by
Category: Uncategorized

Anti-White Discrimination at Yukon Hospitals & B.C. Parks

Posted on by

Anti-White Discrimination at Yukon Hospitals & B.C. Parks

[The degrading of the European  founding/settler people of Canada increases every day. The perpetrators are our own treasonous elite. The latest: the Yukon’s three hospitals will now practise segregation with privileged parking spaces reserved for native Indians. Another slap in the face to the Whites who pay the overwhelming majority of the taxes.The justification?  “These spaces are one way we are show­ing our com­mit­ment to Truth & Recon­cili­ation, Decol­on­iz­a­tion & Indi­gen­iz­a­tion.”

The soul-sickening, phony White guilt pervades the hospitals approach. 

“Sys­temic racism and intol­er­ance is per­vas­ive and deep-rooted . … We know it is present in Canada, in the Yukon and in our com­munit­ies. It exists within our hos­pit­als and health care sys­tem,” reads the agency’s 2022-2027 stra­tegic plan. Yes, “systemic racism” directed at the overtaxes, White dispossessed Majority.

Meanwhile in neighbouring British Columbia, Whites will be excluded from certain provincial parks they pay for for certain times this summer. “

One of the more con­tro­ver­sial was the B.C. gov­ern­ment agree­ing last year to begin clos­ing select pro­vin­cial parks to non-indi­gen­ous users.

Just this week­end, in fact, B.C. is set to shut off pub­lic access to Botan­ical Beach, a pop­u­lar sec­tion of the Juan da Fuca trail. Accord­ing to a state­ment by the B.C. Min­istry of Envir­on­ment, the 72-hour clos­ure is being done “to give mem­bers of the Pacheedaht First Nation time and pri­vacy to har­vest mar­ine resources, con­nect with part of their ter­rit­ory.”

A much longer clos­ure is also being ordered for Jof­fre Lakes Pro­vin­cial Park, which will be closed between June 20 and 27, and then again between Sept. 8 and 30. “These peri­ods will provide space for the Lil­wat Nation and N’quatqua to con­nect with the land,” reads a dis­claimer on the park’s offi­cial site.” (National Post, June 16, 2026) 

n Cana­dian first, Yukon cre­ates race-based park­ing

YUKON POLICY IS TO ASK PATIENTS INDIGENOUS STATUS TO ACCESS SPECIALIZED SERVICES

Tri­stin hop­per16 Jun 2026

As part of their stated com­mit­ment to “decol­on­iz­a­tion and Indi­gen­iz­a­tion” in health care, the Yukon is deb­ut­ing Indi­gen­ous-only park­ing spaces at all three of its hos­pit­als.

In a social media post last week, Yukon Hos­pit­als announced that the ter­rit­ory’s hos­pit­als would hence­forth fea­ture reserved park­ing spots marked “Respect­fully Reserved for Eld­ers.”

Reserved exclus­ively for “First Nation, Inuit, and Métis Eld­ers,” the spaces are marked with signs fea­tur­ing com­mis­sioned art from two Yukon-based Indi­gen­ous artists; one pre­pared a styl­ized image of two eld­ers, while another pre­pared the accom­pa­ny­ing text read­ing “respect­fully reserved for eld­ers.”

“These spaces are one way we are show­ing our com­mit­ment to Truth & Recon­cili­ation, Decol­on­iz­a­tion & Indi­gen­iz­a­tion,” reads a descrip­tion by Yukon Hos­pit­als.

The elder spots are set to be installed at the ter­rit­ory’s main hos­pital in White­horse, as well as at the Dawson City Com­munity Hos­pital and the Wat­son Lake Com­munity Hos­pital. Park­ing for every­one at all three hos­pit­als is free.

They will be placed in lots whose only other des­ig­nated park­ing is cur­rently for staff or dis­abled users. Although the White­horse Gen­eral Hos­pital not­ably has des­ig­nated RV park­ing: a ser­vice for patients from dis­tant com­munit­ies driv­ing in for sched­uled pro­ced­ures.

Yukon Hos­pit­als, like many Cana­dian gov­ern­ment and health-care author­it­ies, has pub­licly embraced the notion that its facil­it­ies are shot through with “sys­temic racism” that can only be alle­vi­ated via dif­fer­en­tial treat­ment for mar­gin­al­ized groups.

“Sys­temic racism and intol­er­ance is per­vas­ive and deep-rooted . … We know it is present in Canada, in the Yukon and in our com­munit­ies. It exists within our hos­pit­als and health care sys­tem,” reads the agency’s 2022-2027 stra­tegic plan.

That same plan has the hos­pital author­ity pledging to make “Yukon First Nations ways of know­ing, doing and being part of everything we do.”

Up to one-third of patients at White­horse Gen­eral Hos­pital are Indi­gen­ous, accord­ing to a Yukon Hos­pit­als estim­ate in a 2016 news­let­ter.

And the ter­rit­ory, like B.C., has a policy of ask­ing patients their Indi­gen­ous status in order to access cul­tur­ally spe­cific ser­vices such as tra­di­tional food or “tra­di­tional medi­cine.”

The sys­tem is largely based on the hon­our sys­tem, however. The patient guide­book to the White­horse Gen­eral Hos­pital notes that the facil­ity’s admit­ting desk will “ask every patient if they would like to identify as First Nations, Métis or Inuit.”

“This will ensure that all per­sons that self-identify will have access to our pro­grams,” it notes.

The threshold of Indi­gen­ous-only park­ing spots is a new one. Not just in the Yukon, but in Canada gen­er­ally.

In fact, the Indi­gen­ous-only spots appear to be Canada’s only instances of pub­lic park­ing spots being set aside based on the immut­able char­ac­ter­ist­ics of the driver.

The closest ana­logue would be instances in both Ger­many and South Korea where pub­lic park­ing spots were set aside exclus­ively for women. Ger­many has been installing women-only park­ing spots since the 1990s, fol­low­ing a wave of viol­ent sexual assaults tak­ing place in park­ing gar­ages.

The spots, labelled “reser­viert fuer frauen,” are typ­ic­ally in well-lit areas loc­ated close to build­ing entrances. No such “she-spots” or “Frauen­park­platz” are known to exist in Canada, although there are spots for expect­ant moth­ers, or par­ents with young chil­dren.

The Yukon park­ing spaces do fit within a lar­ger trend of Indi­gen­ous Cana­dians being given pri­or­ity access to pub­lic spaces in the ser­vice of recon­cili­ation.

One of the more con­tro­ver­sial was the B.C. gov­ern­ment agree­ing last year to begin clos­ing select pro­vin­cial parks to non-indi­gen­ous users.

Just this week­end, in fact, B.C. is set to shut off pub­lic access to Botan­ical Beach, a pop­u­lar sec­tion of the Juan da Fuca trail. Accord­ing to a state­ment by the B.C. Min­istry of Envir­on­ment, the 72-hour clos­ure is being done “to give mem­bers of the Pacheedaht First Nation time and pri­vacy to har­vest mar­ine resources, con­nect with part of their ter­rit­ory.”

A much longer clos­ure is also being ordered for Jof­fre Lakes Pro­vin­cial Park, which will be closed between June 20 and 27, and then again between Sept. 8 and 30. “These peri­ods will provide space for the Lil­wat Nation and N’quatqua to con­nect with the land,” reads a dis­claimer on the park’s offi­cial site.

‘Send them back’ chants in EU Parliament after anti-migrant bill passes.”

Posted on by

In news of the weird and unexpected, yesterday Al Jazeera reported, “‘Send them back’ chants in EU Parliament after anti-migrant bill passes.” The ministers were literally hugging each other.

Well, maybe it isn’t that surprising. But first, the new Europe-wide law established “return hubs” in third countries, expanded detention powers (including home raids without judicial warrants), and fueled a general “hard rightward turn” in EU migration enforcement. PBS framed it as the strictest EU migration law in decades, explicitly modeled on U.S. ICE‑style tactics: extended detention periods, aggressive home searches, tougher entry bans, and offshored facilities where EU process protections are weakest.

“The new regulation will speed up the return process and increase returns of persons who have no legal right to stay in the EU,” said Nicholas Ioannides, deputy migration minister for Cyprus, which holds the rotating presidency of the 27-nation bloc. “Critics compared the regulation to the immigration policies of the Trump administration,” NPR said, without naming the critics (it was NPR and NGO activists).

“These new rules will ensure swifter, simpler, and more effective procedures across the European Union for returning non-EU nationals who have no right to stay, in full respect of international law and fundamental rights,” said Henna Virkkunen, EU commissioner for technology.

“This deal will give governments much broader powers to detain and deport people,” complained Marta Welander, a middle-aged white female activist employed by a migration NGO. “It looks set to normalize immigration raids, and expand the use of detention in prison-like facilities outside EU territory that are essentially legal black holes.”

Legal black holes is also a neat way to describe migration NGOs themselves. They are basically money vortexes disguised as charities that suck up our taxes and pay lawyers to sink the ship of state.

🔥 In my view, three things made these surprising “historic” reforms possible.

First, “far-right” (moderate conservative) parties have been ascendant in Europe, a trend that accelerated after President Trump’s re-election last year. Conservative and “reform” parties now make up about a third of all elected EU members.

Second, center-left parties —also about a third— joined the conservatives to pass the new anti-migration policies. Only the far-left parties (Greens and socialists) opposed the new package and shouted “shame!” at their colleagues after the vote passed. (Although you could hardly hear them over all the joyful celebrating.) Thanks to the center-left’s flip, it passed by an unbeatable two-thirds majority.

Third, the center-left’s course correction from pro-migrant virtue-signaling to pro-sanity common sense followed continuous pressure from the U.S. over the last 18 months, which ceaselessly argued that Europe was destroying itself with its open-borders migration policies, and often linked them to America’s pullback from NATO. According to this headline from EU News, last week, a majority of EU voters now want ICE-like migration policies:

You might fairly ask why I linked this political tipping point in Europe to Trump’s re-election. After all, as the experts always remind us, correlation doesn’t prove causation. Maybe Trump’s election and the rise of sanity in Europe were both caused by some other third factor. To answer, I would point to one specific policy decision, the closure of USAID, and to one person, President Trump, over whom the EU leaders fawned at yesterday’s G7 Summit.

🔥 First, follow the money! Think-tank analysts estimate that up to $2.3 billion annually in U.S. aid ($23 billion every 10 years) was tied to Europe’s “migration management” work. USAID’s closure effectively zeroed this out, leaving a sudden, large gap in financing for development and protection projects in the countries of origin and transit.

In other words, USAID paid the countries where migrants came from, and it paid the countries through which they traveled on their way to Europe. No longer.

The USAID money spigot is closed. Now the EU is reversing those incentives— by paying origin countries to “host” their own migrants. And, whether it was through tariffs, NATO drawdowns, or energy markets, President Trump has beaten European politics in arm-wrestling. This astonishing turnaround was far from certain. EU leaders actively opposed him during Trump 1.0. Remember this iconic 2018 picture, coincidentally also taken at a G7 Summit?

Or this nearly-as-famous shot of the German delegation at the UN General Assembly in September 2018, showing the German Foreign Minister and Ambassador smirking and laughing as Trump warned about Germany’s over-reliance on Russian oil.

Trump opposes open borders and unregulated immigration, especially in the U.S., but also in Europe. Headline from EuroNews, last September:

In July, he spoke at the UN with rhetoric resembling blunt-force trauma. “You’d better get your act together, or you’re not going to have a Europe anymore,” the President warned angrily, like he was leading an intervention. “You’ve got to stop this horrible invasion that’s happening to Europe.”

Now, in complete contrast to their smirking defiance during Trump 1.0, European leaders hang on his every word. They laugh in delight rather than derision when he strolls in late and tells them he is “the boss.” The leaders who used to resist him now want to curry his favor, because he’s got all the leverage. (TAW.)

It is difficult to overestimate how encouraging this week’s anti-migration vote is for the world’s prospects. With Europe’s electric migration issue handled by a broad coalition majority, what else could this newly empowered bloc accomplish, now that it has finally found its political legs? Free speech? Grooming gangs? Reversing decades of social degeneracy?

Could the West’s inevitable decline have just become a little less inevitable?

If, one year ago, I’d told you this was possible, you’d have laughed me right off of Substack. Yet here we are. As I assured our European cousins early last year: hang tight. After we save ourselves, we’re coming to save you, too.

The Anti-Life, Anti-Heterosexual Agenda of the Canada-Funded Organization of American States

Posted on by

They tore our banners down from the airport walls. Under direct orders from the Secretary General of an institution most Canadians have never had a reason to think about. Before the meeting had even started.

My name is Rocío D’Angelo. I’m writing to you because what is happening right now reaches all the way from my home to yours. Before I tell you what is happening, let me tell you who “they” are, because Canada is helping pay for them, and I believe you deserve to know.

The OAS, the Organization of American States, is a body of 35 countries that sets the rules Latin American governments are pressured to follow. Every year, it holds its General Assembly. Canada funds it. And this year, that Assembly has become a weapon aimed straight at the heart of the family.

That might sound harmless. It isn’t.

Because what the OAS writes down does not stay on a shelf.

Judges quote it in our court rulings. Aid agencies attach it to funding for our nations. Lobbyists carry it into parliaments throughout Latin America.

I was at the 54th Assembly in Paraguay. I was at the 55th in Antigua, when they threatened to ban me from speaking. When I stood up in that room, I delivered the message of Latino families who refuse to be silenced.

Now I’ve spent the last few weeks reading this year’s OAS Political Declaration, line by line. And what I found is a direct threat to families like yours and mine.

This is what the Declaration says:

  • That abortion is an inter-American “human right” — wiping out every legal protection for the unborn across the region.
  • That “gender identity” must be embedded in schools, hospitals, courts, and laws across all of the Americas.
  • That surrogacy is “reproductive autonomy” — turning children into commercial products and women into biological instruments.
  • That euthanasia is a “dignified death” — attacking the right to life from both ends.

But what does this actually look like in your daily life?

This is not harmless political theater; these are real life-and-death stakes. Their extreme abortion and euthanasia mandates will end human lives.

It means an unelected bureaucrat could have more influence over what your child is taught than you do. It means Latin American countries that protect life will be punished with diplomatic isolation and aid cuts.

And this year they came armed with something new: a “Civil Society Participation Manual”, a bureaucratic bullying stick designed to control, filter, and silence any organization that dares to resist from inside the OAS.

The Assembly meets in Panama in days. I’ll be in that room, meeting with delegations face to face.

But a lone voice isn’t enough. Your signature goes directly to Canada’s ambassadors while negotiations are still open. When they see thousands of their own citizens watching, it changes what they do.

We have days. Not weeks. Days.

Will you add your name right now and tell Canada’s Minister of Foreign Affairs and OAS ambassadors to strip every pro-abortion, pro-surrogacy, and pro-euthanasia clause from this Political Declaration?

Paul, here is the part I need you to understand most.

Canada does not just sit in that room. Canada pays for it. The OAS runs special earmarked funds for exactly this kind of programming, and Canada is now the second-largest donor to them, behind only the United States.

And look at what happened this year. The United States cut its contributions to these funds by nearly half, precisely to stop this agenda. Ottawa did the opposite. Your federal government increased Canada’s contributions to fill the gap left by the Americans.

I know Canadian families are not living in luxury. I know you are stretched by rent, by grocery bills, by taxes. And yet your money is being shipped south to bankroll the very machine pushing abortion and gender ideology onto nations that never asked for it, including mine. Even Canada’s own Auditor General has said Global Affairs Canada cannot prove this kind of “feminist” foreign spending achieves anything at all.

But there is something worse than the money, Paul, and I say this as someone watching it happen to her own home.

Canada is not only the wallet for this agenda. Canada is the blueprint.

Ask yourself why the architects of this Declaration chose these exact words. It is because they already have a country that has done every single one of these things, and they want the rest of us to copy it. That country is yours.

I do not say this to wound you, and I do not blame the Canadian families I have met and prayed with. But look honestly at what the elites have built in your name.

Canada is one of the only nations on earth with no legal limit on abortion at any stage of pregnancy, none written in its criminal law at all. Canada legalized euthanasia and then expanded it so quickly that Canadians have been offered death when what they needed was housing, care, or a little more help to keep living. Gender ideology has been written into your schools, your hospitals, and your courts, and parents who object are treated as the problem.

I do not believe most Canadians ever truly chose this. I believe it was done to your families, much as they now want to do it to mine.

And that is what makes this true colonialism.

They are not sending my region medicine, clean water, or food. They are sending us your government’s biggest mistakes. They are taking the abortion regime, the euthanasia culture, and the gender experiment that have wounded so many Canadian families, and using your wealth and Canada’s seat at the OAS to press them down like a stamp onto countries from Mexico to Argentina.

We still believe in life. We still believe in the family. Many of us still believe in God. And unlike the nations already remade, we still have the chance to say no if people like you will stand with us while there is still time.

This year’s Political Declaration is not just another resolution that collects dust. It’s a foundational document that will define the direction of the entire inter-American system for decades. Judges will quote it. Aid agencies will weaponize it. Lobbyists will wave it in every parliament across the hemisphere.

But here’s what the globalists didn’t count on: their own house is on fire.

The OAS Secretary General, the same man who ordered our banners torn down in Antigua, Albert Ramdin, is now at the center of a major corruption scandal. A confidential Trump administration memo, titled “Diplomacy or Dynasty? The Credibility Crisis at the OAS,” has just been leaked to the press.

It calls for an independent investigation, accusing him of nepotism, fiscal recklessness, and blatant disregard for member states. The United States, which funds 50% of the OAS budget, is now demanding his accountability.

And honestly? When I read that, I had to put my phone down for a second.

This is our moment. The institution pushing this agenda is weakened. And the political wind has shifted.

The governments of Argentina, El Salvador, Ecuador, Paraguay, Peru, and the United States were all elected on the same mandate: defend life, family, and national sovereignty.

Chile, Costa Rica, and the Dominican Republic have now joined them: pro-family governments that owe their voters a clear stand at this Assembly.

This is our moment to hold every one of them to their word, and to ask Canada to stop standing on the wrong side of it.

But mandates don’t enforce themselves.

Every ambassador walking into that room in Panama will face pressure from every direction: abortion lobbyists, gender ideology financiers, and global organizations whose entire mission depends on this agenda advancing. They’ll be there, whispering consequences, threatening isolation.

The only thing that can counter that pressure is YOU.

CitizenGO has the strategy and the experience. We have allies inside the negotiations. And we have you.

Every name on this petition is delivered directly to ambassadors’ inboxes while talks are still underway. Every signature gives backbone to those who promised to defend life, family, and freedom, and puts Canada’s delegation on notice.

I know they read them. I’ve seen with my own eyes how it changes what they do when they know their people are watching.

Tell Canada’s Minister of Foreign Affairs and OAS ambassadors: reject this radical, deadly language, stop funding it with Canadian money, and stop trying to remake our homelands in the image of your government’s worst policies.

Here’s why our petition can tip the scales.

Because the OAS doesn’t just fear CitizenGO’s petitions… they fear what your signature represents. They fear parents who believe they have rights. They fear citizens who defend life. They fear anyone who won’t bow.

And that’s exactly why your name matters. Your signature is not a gesture. It’s a warning delivered directly to every negotiator in that room: Don’t you dare use Canadian taxes to spread this, and don’t you dare hold up Canada as the model the rest of the Americas must follow.

Life is not negotiable. Family is not expendable. And no institution, no matter how powerful, has the right to redefine both without your consent.

This is not just another vote. It’s a battle for the soul of the Americas. And we will not be silent. Let the OAS hear your voice before it’s too late.

So I’m asking you personally:

Sign the petition now, share it everywhere, and let the OAS hear a roar too loud to ignore.

Thank you for fighting for life, family, and freedom when it matters most.

Rocío D’Angelo and the entire CitizenGO team

P.S. Canada isn’t just a member of the OAS; it bankrolls it. After the U.S. rightly slashed its support, Ottawa stepped in as the second-largest donor, funneling your taxes into the very programs that social-engineer abortion and gender ideology across Latin America.

Even more chilling, globalist architects are using Canada’s own failures,  as the blueprint for every nation in our hemisphere to follow.

What gets locked into this Declaration in Panama today will be weaponized by courts, aid agencies, and bureaucrats to reshape the Americas for decades.

If we remain quiet, the bureaucrats win, and they’ll keep using Canadian money to export this cultural war in your name. Your signature lands directly in the inboxes of Canada’s delegation while the negotiations are still raging. We have days, not weeks. Add your name now before this radical agenda is locked in!

More information:

Political crisis at the OAS: The United States demands an accounting investigation into the management of Secretary General Albert Ramdin:
https://www.infobae.com/estados-unidos/2026/05/19/crisis-politica-en-la-oea-estados-unidos-exige-una-investigacion-contable-sobre-la-gestion-del-secretario-general-ramdin/

Ideological censorship against CitizenGO at the OAS:
https://x.com/bethel_noticias/status/1938678406373114008?s=46

Young people need freedom, not persecution for thinking differently, warns Rocío D’Angelo.
https://siete24.mx/mexico/nacional/jovenes-necesitan-libertad-no-persecucion-por-pensar-distinto-advierte-rocio-dangelo/

CitizenGO denounces censorship and threats at the 2025 OAS General Assembly.
https://x.com/canalbpe/status/1937875982305857734?s=46

https://canalb.pe/noticias/actualidad/citizengo-denuncia-censura-y-amenazas-en-asamblea-general-de-la-oea

OAS censors pro-life billboards during its 55th Assembly.
https://lapalabra.gt/noticias-destacadas/censura-de-la-oea-a-vallas-provida-durante-su-59a-asamblea/

CitizenGO denounces censorship and threats at the OAS General Assembly.

Congreso Iberoamericano por la Vida y la Familia supports CitizenGO
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1HiDPBMtqW/?mibextid=wwXIfr

OAS accused of censoring pro-life billboards.
https://www.evangelicodigital.com/latinoamerica/36944/denuncian-que-la-oea-censuro-vallas-publicitarias-provida

Controversy erupts over anti-gay campaign at Antigua airport
https://dominicanewsonline.com/news/homepage/homepage-carousel/controversy-erupts-over-anti-gay-campaign-at-antigua-airport/

The radical globalists and woke elites want to erase our values—but together, we stand strong. CitizenGO is a movement of millions around the world, fighting every day to defend life, family, and freedom against those who seek to undermine them. We are faithful, so we will never quit

Give Ireland Back to the Irish

Posted on by