The AfD is not a problem for Germany – it’s the solution

Posted on by

The AfD is not a problem for Germany – it’s the solution

The former GDR is distancing itself from Western liberalism, reclaiming its heritage and national identity

By Constantin von Hoffmeister, a political and cultural commentator from Germany, published author, and editor-in-chief of Arktos Publishing

The AfD is not a problem for Germany – it’s the solution

FILE PHOTO: Supporters of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party march in Hamburg, Germany. ©  Sean Gallup / Getty Images

The recent elections in East Germany reveal something far more profound than a shift in political allegiance – they signal the re-emergence of a deep-seated German spirit that refuses to bow to the decaying influence of Western liberalism. The success of the patriotic party AfD (Alternative for Germany) in the East is proof of the enduring divide between East and West Germany, a divide shaped by vastly different historical experiences and a clash of values.

East Germans have always been more conservative than their Western counterparts, and for good reason. After World War Two, West Germany was placed under the occupation of the Americans, who imposed their liberal ideology on the German people. Over the decades, this ideology has seeped into every corner of West German society, promoting concepts such as a nebulous “diversity,” multiculturalism, LGBT propaganda, and the insane trans cult. West Germany, inundated by American cultural imperialism, has lost touch with the very essence of what it means to be German, embracing ideologies that are alien to the German soul. It remains occupied in all but name, with numerous American military bases dotting its landscape – a constant reminder that it is not truly sovereign. West Germany’s blind loyalty to America has steered it towards a path of spiritual and cultural ruin.

In contrast, East Germany, under the German Democratic Republic (GDR), was part of the Soviet sphere of influence. Despite what many Western conservatives might believe, the Soviet Union was far from the “progressive” bastion it is often portrayed as. It re-criminalized homosexuality in 1934, dismissed modern art as decadent, and promoted traditional family values – everything that many genuine conservatives in the West today wish their societies would embrace once more. The GDR adopted many of these conservative principles, becoming the last truly German state – a state that preserved and revived the Prussian ideals of duty, discipline, and national pride. As a symbol of this continuity, the GDR re-erected the statue of the glorious populist leader Frederick the Great in East Berlin, reaffirming its connection to the Prussian legacy. 

Read more

The German establishment is desperately clinging to power in defiance of democracy

Sahra Wagenknecht and her movement, the Sahra Wagenknecht Alliance (BSW), have emerged as key players in Germany’s struggle to resurrect its long-buried national identity. Wagenknecht, who has sharply criticized the liberal-left establishment for its role in destroying Germany’s cultural character, offers a ray of hope. Her movement combines leftist economic policies with culturally conservative positions, combined with staunch opposition to NATO meddling. Wagenknecht’s ideas are similar to those of Ernst Niekisch, the “National Bolshevik” thinker who believed that Germany should align with Russia rather than the liberal West. Niekisch, who was imprisoned by the Nazis for his beliefs and later liberated by the Red Army, understood that Germany’s future lay not in the West. It would be better off forging its own path alongside the East. Niekisch even argued that the GDR should officially rename itself to “Prussia.”

Yet, fear – deliberately cultivated by the dying liberal order – hinders the natural alliance between the AfD and BSW. Such an alliance could form because both parties share strong opposition to unrestricted immigration and skepticism towards Germany’s support for Ukraine and subservience to the American empire. Both also emphasize national sovereignty and protection of German interests, presenting themselves as defenders of traditional values in contrast to the liberal establishment. While the BSW leans more left economically, with calls for expanded social welfare, and the AfD favors limiting benefits, their shared stance on migration control and border security provides significant overlap that could bring them together politically.

The AfD has been relentlessly slandered as “right-wing extremist” by the mainstream media and political ruling class, portrayed as a threat to the very people it seeks to protect. This is a lie, a desperate attempt by a faltering regime to hold on to power. Wagenknecht and her supporters must see beyond this distortion and recognize that the AfD is not an enemy. Instead, it is a partner in the fight for Germany’s future. The unity of the AfD and BSW is not only politically necessary; it is a moral imperative.

The legacy of the GDR has been grossly mischaracterized, particularly by those in the West who interpret it through the lens of liberal ideology. The GDR was not the dystopian nightmare it is often portrayed as. Rather, it was a state that maintained the values that have always defined the German people. It placed the welfare of the people above all, creating a sense of community and purpose that the individualist West could never comprehend. The GDR’s rejection of Western decadence and embrace of socialist realism were not mere political moves but were significant cultural statements – an assertion of the enduring over the fleeting.

The GDR’s commitment to education, healthcare, and social cohesion was a continuation of the great Prussian tradition – a tradition that has always been the foundation of German culture. Unlike the West, which has been compromised by American influence and the mercantilist mentality of the British, the GDR remained faithful to itself, resisting the siren song of liberalism. 

Germany’s future does not rest with the declining West but with the resilient and resurgent East. The recent electoral success of the AfD in Thuringia and Saxony is a political victory as well as a clear sign that the East is on the rise. However, this is not just a regional phenomenon; it is a national call to action. Germany must turn its gaze eastward, towards Russia, and away from the corrosive influence of America, which has led the West into moral and cultural decay. In doing so, it will fulfill the vision of Ernst Niekisch – a vision of a sovereign Germany, strong and allied with the East in pursuit of its own destiny.

If Germany is to reclaim its identity and future, unity is essential among those who oppose the liberal agenda. Together, the AfD and BSW can become a formidable force that will stand up for the German people and German ideals. The AfD is not the problem – it is the solution. It is the spearhead of a new Germany, one that will rise from the ashes of the old, stronger than ever before.

Canada, Good Country

Posted on by

Something to Consider When Sourcing Immigration or “Refugee” Intake

Posted on by

Something to Consider When Sourcing Immigration or “Refugee” Intake

Blatant Anti-White Discrimination at University of Winnipeg Student Lounge

Posted on by

Author of the article:

Kevin Klein

(Winnipeg Sun, Dec 06, 2024) • 

The University of Winnipeg
The University of Winnipeg. Photo by file

Discrimination has no place in our society, yet it appears to have been institutionalized in a troubling way at the University of Winnipeg (UW).

t

Recent reporting by True North has shed light on a disturbing practice by the University of Winnipeg Students’ Association (UWSA): the operation of a lounge since 2018 inside the Bulman Student Centre that explicitly excludes students based on their race.

Known as the BIPoC Lounge, this space is open only to students who identify as Black, Indigenous, or as people of colour. Students who identify as white are not welcome. This is segregation, plain and simple, and it must not be tolerated in any form.

The Winnipeg Sun reached out to both the University of Winnipeg administration and the UWSA for comment.

In an emailed statement, the UW said, “The university leases this space to the UWSA, which is a separate organization. We can’t speak on behalf of the UWSA.”

The UWSA said, “[We] may respond at a later time.” Their reluctance to address this issue is as disappointing as it is telling.

The BIPoC Lounge is advertised as a “safe space” for racial minorities to “learn and heal through their understandings and experiences as BIPoC.”

Events hosted there, such as movie nights, study sessions, and book club meetings, are also restricted to students of colour. The lounge’s rules, posted prominently at its entrance, leave no room for ambiguity: students who do not meet the racial criteria are not allowed to enter. This exclusionary policy flies in the face of the values of equality and inclusivity that universities are supposed to uphold.

The University of Winnipeg’s own statistics highlight the rich diversity of its campus. As of 2019, 11.8% of the student population identified as Indigenous, while international students — hailing from countries such as India, Nigeria, and China — now make up 18% of the student body. This diversity should be celebrated and embraced by fostering spaces where all students can come together to share their experiences and perspectives. Instead, the BIPoC Lounge’s policy creates division, erecting walls between students rather than building bridges.

The Winnipeg Sun’s Daily Headline New

This practice raises serious questions about compliance with Manitoba’s Human Rights Code, which explicitly prohibits discrimination based on race, colour, ancestry, nationality, or ethnic origin, among other characteristics. The Code is clear: no one should be excluded from any public space or service because of race. By allowing the UWSA to operate a racially exclusive lounge on its premises, the University of Winnipeg is tacitly endorsing a policy that appears to violate the very principles of human rights.

Imagine for a moment if the situation were reversed. What if a lounge were established that explicitly barred students of colour? The outrage would be immediate and deafening, and rightly so. People would march in the streets, demanding accountability and justice. Yet in this instance, there has been a deafening silence from many quarters, including from those who claim to champion equality and social justice. This double standard is as troubling as the discriminatory policy itself.

View ResultsCrowdsignal.com

Universities should be places where young minds are challenged to think critically and engage with ideas that differ from their own. They should not be places where segregation is normalized under the guise of creating “safe spaces.”

This is a massive step backward, not progress and it harkens to an era when people were divided and excluded based on the colour of their skin. It sows division and mistrust, undermining the very fabric of our society.

The silence from leadership on this issue is equally damning. Premier Wab Kinew, who often speaks about unity and reconciliation, has yet to address this matter. His inaction speaks volumes. Leaders are supposed to stand up for what is right, even when it is uncomfortable or politically inconvenient. By failing to condemn this policy, they are failing the very people they claim to represent.

The University of Winnipeg’s administration also bears responsibility. Their statement that they merely “lease” the space to the UWSA is a feeble attempt to absolve themselves of accountability. Universities have a duty to ensure that all activities conducted on their premises adhere to the principles of equality and non-discrimination. Turning a blind eye to such practices is nothing short of complicity.

Where is the outrage? Where are the voices of Canadians who believe in fairness, equality, and justice for all? This is not just an issue for white students who are being excluded, it is an issue for everyone who believes in the principles of human rights. Discrimination in any form, against any group, is wrong. It is a stain on our collective conscience and an affront to the values that so many Canadians have fought and died to uphold.

Thousands of Canadians gave their lives in the fight against tyranny and oppression during the World Wars. They fought for a world where people would not be judged or excluded based on their race or ethnicity. To see such exclusion now being practised in our own country, under the banner of progressivism, is not only heartbreaking but also deeply shameful.

As Canadians, we must ask ourselves: how did we get here? How did we allow such blatant discrimination to take root in our institutions of higher learning? And more importantly, what are we going to do about it? It is not enough to shake our heads in disapproval or to post our frustrations on social media. We need action.

The Manitoba Human Rights Commission must investigate this matter to determine whether the UWSA’s policy violates the Human Rights Code. If it does, immediate steps must be taken to rectify the situation. The University of Winnipeg’s administration must also take a stand. It is not enough to pass the buck to the UWSA. They must assert their authority and ensure that all spaces on their campus are open to every student, regardless of race.

This issue is about more than just one lounge or one university. It is about the kind of society we want to build. Do we want a society where people are judged and divided based on the colour of their skin? Or do we want a society where everyone is treated with dignity and respect, and where diversity is celebrated as a strength rather than used as a tool for exclusion?

The answer should be clear. Discrimination has no place in Canada, in Manitoba, or at the University of Winnipeg. It is time for all of us to stand up and say so. Enough is enough.

— Kevin Klein is a former Tory cabinet minister, a former city councillor and President & CEO of Klein Group Ltd.

The  Canada First Immigration Reform Committee Proudly Presents

Posted on by

The  Canada First Immigration Reform Committee Proudly Present

                                         PAUL FROMM

Director, Canadian Association for Free Expression

Winner of the George Orwell Free Speech Award, 1994

What President Trump’s Victory Means to Canada: Will We Get Immigration Reform, At Last?

·         Stopping the Invasion in the U.S.

·         Will the frustrated invaders flood north?

·         Other policy pressures (energy, defence) which may hasten real change in Canada

VANCOUVER. Friday, November 29, 2024

https://www.bitchute.com/video/SsIS0hWbEds7

And What Was The Result of Discovering These Fraudsters: Deportation? Denial of Visa?

Posted on by

And What Was The Result of Discovering These Fraudsters: Deportation? Denial of Visa?

A Message from Santa Claus

Posted on by
Category: Uncategorized

President Trump is Right: Canada Has to Secure Its Borders — Indian Thieves on “Student Visas”

Posted on by

President Trump is Right: Canada Has to Secure Its Borders — Indian Thieves on “Student Visas”

Four Indian “students” in Canada charged for smashing up dozens of cars in Oakville, stealing items.

The Woke Wrecking Crew, Trashing Our Traditions

Posted on by

The Woke Wrecking Crew, Trashing Our Traditions
No Christmas Tree in Pickering this year.

Young White Woman Tells Some Truths About White Guilt

Posted on by
https://www.tiktok.com/@mkwhataboutit/video/7442946774190361902

pass this posting around the world !

This young White woman will reach millions of Whites around the World!

She goes by the screen name of mkwtsaboutit ..truth teller