Inaccurate population data could negatively affect policy: expert –Non-permanent residents missed, CIBC report says: The Ottawa Gang that Count Properly

Posted on by

Inaccurate population data could negatively affect policy: expert

Non-permanent residents missed, CIBC report says

  • National Post
  • 1 Sep 2023
  • Naimul Karim Financial Post nkarim@postmedia.com

There are about a million more non-permanent residents in Canada than the official number that is widely quoted and used for planning purposes by various authorities, according to a recent report by CIBC World Markets Inc.

If ignored, the “undercounting” could hurt Canada’s housing and labour policies, said economist Benjamin Tal, who wrote the Aug. 30 report, Counting heads in Canada — a conundrum. Statistics Canada keeps track of population counts in two ways. The first is the census, last published in 2021, which indicated there were about 925,000 non-permanent residents in Canada. It also provides quarterly and annual estimates of population growth. This estimate, Tal said, suggests the population of non-permanent residents in 2021 was about 1.17 million, or 250,000 more than what the census stated.

Statistics Canada said these estimates are based on post-census coverage studies of a representative sample of individuals to determine how many individuals were missed or counted more than once.

In addition, the CIBC report said that between 2017 and 2022, there were at least 750,000 non-permanent residents, which represent foreign workers, international students, holders of Minister’s Permits and refugees, who overstayed in Canada. Tal said Statistics

Canada has yet to reflect these numbers.

Statistics Canada’s current system assumes that temporary resident visa holders have left the country 30 days after the expiry of their visa. The agency refers to this as an interruption period. However, Tal said there is a huge group of people who continue to stay in the country while applying for work visas, extension of resident visas and permanent visas.

While these residents are accounted for once their permit to stay is renewed, they are not counted — after the 30-day period — until their application is approved by government.

As such, to come up with the 750,000 number, Tal looked at the gap between the applications submitted to Canada and the number of approvals between 2017 and 2022. His report doesn’t indicate how many left the country during this period.

In total, he said Canada has undercounted the number of temporary residents by at least a million, and that since the country’s housing agency follows the census for its policies, the undercounting could worsen the existing housing crisis.

“Demand is stronger than what official numbers are telling you and that’s why we are approaching zero vacancy rate in rental apartments,” Tal said. “We don’t have enough of them.”

He added that the undercounting could also have “major implications” on any government plan to put a cap on the number of international students.

Housing minister Sean Fraser on Aug. 22 said the government would need to do some “serious thinking” when it comes to the international student program, which has had immense growth in concentrated

areas, as part of the government’s plans to ease existing housing pressures.

Statistics Canada defended its numbers. Spokesperson Melissa Gammage said the agency wasn’t aware of the data sources or the methodology used by CIBC to come up with the 750,000 figure. “It’s true that the level of coverage of NPRS (non-permanent residents) in censuses can be more challenging than that of other groups,” she said in a statement. “However, after each census, Statcan conducts rigorous coverage studies to estimate the level of coverage of the census. The results are added to demographic estimates so that they consider NPRS missed by the census. This is the usual process of producing demographic estimates.”

Gammage also said that from Sept. 27 onward, the agency will publish new data tables on non-permanent residents that will include interruption period rules, more details on NPRS, such as their estimated numbers and permit types, as well as other “improvements.” The new approach was previously planned and not in response to the CIBC report.

Tal welcomed the changes. “We are blessed with one of the best statistical agencies in the world. We are heavy users of Stats Canada’s data,” he said. “The note was not aimed to criticize, but rather to point to some issues that need to be looked at.”

Bank of Nova Scotia analyst Rebekah Young said there should be an urgency in addressing data challenges with respect to population estimates, but added that it would be a “stretch” to put too much blame on an undercount for today’s strained infrastructure.