In this article, Paul Fromm, free speech warrior, explores the reality of mass non-White Immigration, its role in the steady march towards the extermination of White Europeans, and its underlying causes…

Mass immigration, in the form of a flood of “refugees”, is transforming the White or European world. Open door immigration policies dating back to 1965 mean that, by 2041, the European founding/settler people of the U.S. will become a minority. They were 90 per cent of the U.S. when John F. Kennedy was elected in 1960. People of European ancestry are now just 61 per cent.  Canada will become majority non-White by 2050.

In both cases, the replacement of the European founding/settler people came about by public policy. Yet, this policy of ethnic replacement or ethnic cleansing on the installment plan is almost never discussed let alone debated politically.

Part of the ecstatic applause and enthusiasm that have greeted Donald Trump is his willingness to tackle at least part of the immigration issue. Many White Americans know that their country is being changed out from under them. Their neighbourhoods have been made “diverse” through mass immigration; their town’s main street  has been hollowed out, and much business moved to a WalMart super store stuffed with cheap Chinese imports; and many of their decent paying jobs have been outsourced to China or Mexico or Vietnam. And all the while, campuses and much of the mass media blare accusations that they, Whites, are the cause of most of America’s problems. They, the victims of minority-preference “affirmative action”,  are derided for White Privilege.

Samuel Francis, a close adviser to Pat Buchanan, a former staffer to North Carolina Senator John East, and writer for Chronicles, 20 years ago urged the abandonment of “conservatism” and the embrace of racial nationalism. Mainstream Republicans, focused narrowly on money, and Democrats, wildly courting anti-White minorities, had both abandoned White working Americans. Both welcomed the demographic invasion by the Third World, which, by 2041, will render the European founding/settler people a minority in the land they built. The Republicans rubbed their hands with glee at the thought of cheap labour — legal or illegal. The Democrats rejoiced in the replacement of Whites, whom they detest.

Samuel Francis wrote:

Middle American forces, emerging from the ruins of the old independent middle and working classes, found conservative, libertarian, and pro-business Republican ideology and rhetoric irrelevant, distasteful, and even threatening to their own socioeconomic interests. The post Second World War Middle Class was, in reality, an affluent proletariat, economically dependent on the federal government through labor codes, housing loans, educational programmes, defence contracts and health, and unemployment benefits. All variations of conservative doctrine rejected these. … Yet, at the same time, the Ruling Class proved unable to uproot the social, cultural, and national identities and loyalties of the Middle American proletariat, and Middle Americans found themselves increasingly alienated from the political left, and its embrace of anti-national policies, and counter-cultural manners and morals.

“Black lives matter,” they are told, but it is Whites who are overwhelmingly the victims of inter-racial crime.

In late August, 2016 at a White House gathering, “White House Summit on Countering Violent Extremism” Vice-President Joe Biden hailed the swift replacement of America’s European founding/settler people as a “strength”, as a good thing. Even an amoeba fights for its own survival, but Biden enthused and hailed…

….an unrelenting stream of immigration; non-stop, non-stop. Folks like me who are Caucasian, of European descent, for the first time in 2017 will be in an absolute minority in the United States of America, absolute minority. Fewer than fifty percent of the people in America, from then on will be white, European stock. That’s not a bad thing. That’s a source of our strength.

He is technically wrong: Whites are not yet a minority. However, his enthusiasm for the replacement of his own people, and his insistence that it is inevitable speaks to the moral depravity and mental illness of our ruling class.

The past year has seen the wholesale invasion of Europe by Third Worlders, variously described as “refugees” or  “migrants”.  Unlike the emaciated, bedraggled refugees of yesteryear, these are mostly robust young men, well dressed and chattering on their cellphones. They have the money to pay greedy gangsters and people smugglers. By boat or by land, they surge into hapless, overwhelmed Greece, and arrogantly battle with police and try to force their way north to the handout capitals of Europe – Germany and Sweden.

Last year, Germany accepted over a million Third World migrants who promptly paid  back the long-suffering German taxpayers, who must pony up over $13,500 to support each migrant, by the mass assault and rape of German and other European women during New Year’s public gatherings in Cologne, Hamburg, Vienna, Salzburg, and Stockholm. The police tried to downplay the fact that the attackers were organized Moslems. The press too initially joined the cover-up. However, the social media – cellphones, You Tube, Twitter, e-mail – allowed scenes of assaults to go viral. There were reports of Germans being expelled from their apartments to make room for the invaders. Other You Tube videos showed Moslems molesting bathers, male and female, at public pools and defecating in the water. Children have also been molested in public swimming pools, and this situation is ongoing.

Yet, according to most of the media, the villains were the “extreme Right” who protested the outrages of the unwanted “guests”. Police visited outspoken critics of the invasion who had posted their views on Facebook, threatening them with the loss of their jobs, and even the loss of their children. Why would European leadership be so unable and unwilling to deal with the invasion? How do we make sense of German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s decision to welcome over a million largely unassimilatable Third Worlders at a time when there are no jobs for them. Germany, the best off country in Europe, still has over 6 per cent unemployment.

Merkel is a former communist. Then known as Angela Kasner, she was propaganda secretary in the Young Communist League. She may have shed her economic communism, but remains a dedicated cultural Marxist. She is militantly anti-nationalist. Her immigration policy will help displace or replace the German people. The ideas behind the European Union were not a benign move toward more economic co-operation, peaceful coexistence, and a breaking down of barriers.

The evil genius behind the European Union is Count Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi (1894-1972), son of an Austro-Hungarian diplomat and a Japanese upper class woman. In 1922, he founded the Pan European Movement. He quickly attracted leftist support and money. Early supporters of his ideas included Sigmund Freud and Albert Einstein, and leftist politicians like Thomas Masaryk and Edvard Benes of Czechoslovakia; Ignaz Seipel and Karl Renner of Austria; and Aristide Briand and Leon Blum of France.

In 1924, German banker Max Warburg gave him a war chest of 60,000 gold marks. In 1925, Coudenhove-Kalergi travelled to the U.S. and lined up more funding from financiers Paul Warburg and Bernard Baruch. In the ‘30s and war years, the European Union movement became dormant.

After the war, Coudenhove-Kalergi attracted support for his idea from Winston Churchill, B’nai Brith and theNew York Times. In 1947, Coudenhove-Kalergi became General Secretary of the European Parliamentary Union.

The Europe of the future, for Coudenhove-Kalergi, would no longer have independent countries;  it would no longer even have distinct nationalities. The New European would be a mixed raced individual. In his blueprint for this genocidal nightmare, Praktischer Idealismus (Practical Idealism), he describes the new European:

The man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-negroid race of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples and the diversity of individuals.”  And Jews will  be the spiritual nobility of Europe.

His father had written a book denouncing anti-Semitism and had been a close friend of Theodore Herzl, the founder of Zionism. Coudenhove-Kalergi’s first romantic encounter had been with the future actress Ida Roland, who was Jewish. Mass Third World immigration would be the means to changing the make-up of Europe’s population by replacing Europeans, leading to the race-mixing that would produce the rootless population of Coudenhove-Kalergi’s dream.

Very significant, according to Coudenhove-Kalergi himself, was the Jewish backing for his intensely anti-nationalist plans. “At the beginning of 1924”, he wrote, “we received a call from Baron Louis de Rothschild; one of his friends, Max Warburg from Hamburg had read my book and wanted to get to know us. … Warburg generously offered 60,000 gold marks to tide the movement over its first three years. Max Warburg, who was one of the most distinguished and wisest men I have ever come into contact with, had a principle of financing these movements. He remained sincerely interested in Pan-Europe for his entire life. Max Warburg arranged my 1925 trip to the United States to introduce me to Paul Warburg and financier Bernard Baruch”. Jewish, as well, it might be noted.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel is an ideological daughter of Coudenhove-Kalergi.  In fact, in 2010, she was the recipient of the Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize. For her, the hordes of “migrants” presented not a challenge or threat, but a golden opportunity to bring more Third Worlders into Germany, which has a below-replacement birth rate. Many of the African and Middle Easterners have families of 5, 6, or 7 children.

Mrs. Merkel made a telling comment, in 2004, when Carl-Eduard Graf von Bismarck, great-grandson of Count Otto von Bismarck, married a Canadian Jew, Nathalie Berman. “You two have united history … the next Prince of Bismarck will be a mix of both religions, ”  she told the couple. Actually, she’s wrong. Judaism is passed on through the mother, and the children will not be a “mix”, but will, in fact, be Jewish.

A ideological son of the vile White-hating Coudenhove-Kalergi is Merkel’s sidekick, Vice Chancellor and Leader of the Social Democratic Party, Sigmar Gabriel. He recently lost his temper and tossed the finger at young anti-immigration protesters in Salzgitter. He threw them the finger because the protesters alluded to his father’s past. Gabriel’s Father, Walter Gabriel, remained a staunch Nationalist up until his death in 2012, criticizing his own son for being hopelessly indoctrinated, and his socialist party as harmful to Germany.

Stung by the healthy rejection by many Germans of being replaced by Third World hordes, Gabriel  has called for the jailing of anybody protesting uncontrolled mass immigration. He refers to nationalists as “lowlife scum, unworthy of being called German” and implied that any refugee is more German than a nationalist could ever be. He frequently refers to Europe as the “United States of Europe”, considers Germany a country of immigration, openly calls for abolishing national borders, advertises in favour of giving anybody dual citizenship, and wastes no opportunity to express his contempt for his home country.

By Paul Fromm

(Photos and captions by Odinia)