https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rLtFIrqhfng Please send links and comments to hmakow@gmail.com Jaguar has a reputation for performance and style. Why would they destroy their image with a commercial that insults consumers? After the Bud Lite debacle, do you think this was a miscalculation? No,
Former prosecutor says trucker could have been arrested, RCMP disagree
[Navjeet Singh went through a stop sign in in Altona, Manitoba. Shades of another Sikh who did the same thing in Humbolt, Saskatchewan, and wiped out 1 members of the tiny community’s hockey team. This Singh killed two. — beautiful Sara Unger and her daughter Alexa. Driver Navjeet Singh was apprehended at the scene. He was shaken up. The bumbling Mounties did not detain him. He’s since fled. Of course, nobody knows nuffin. It turns out we don’t even know if he’s a Canadian citizen. Thanks, Justin.]
Search continues for man wanted on Canada-wide warrant after highway death of mother, daughter
A former Crown prosecutor says Manitoba RCMP likely could have arrested a semi-truck driver now wanted on Canada-wide warrant, but police argue it wouldn’t have stopped the man from leaving before they pressed charges.
Mounties continued the search Friday for 25-year-old Navjeet Singh, who was charged Wednesday in a fatal collision that killed Sara Unger, 35, and her eight-year-old Alexa Unger.
“I think anybody looking back on this turn of events on this case might say, ‘Well, wasn’t it foreseeable, wasn’t it predictable that this could have happened?’” said former prosecutor Brandon Trask.
“I would be concerned if people in the public are left with the impression that police don’t have the ability to arrest somebody if they’ve got a belief based on reasonable grounds that an individual had committed an offence.”
Police allege Singh was driving a semi-trailer that blew a stop sign at an intersection near Altona and struck the Ungers’ SUV on Nov. 15.
Singh was taken to hospital after the crash and officers attempted to interview him, but he was too shaken up to provide a statement. Investigators scheduled a meeting with him later but he failed to show up, RCMP Sgt. Paul Manaigre said.
A warrant was issued for his arrest, but Singh had not been seen by police for two days as of Friday evening. It is unclear whether he remains in Winnipeg, or may have fled the province.
Manaigre said officers did not detain Singh at the hospital because they were not within their legal rights. The investigation was ongoing and police were not prepared to lay charges, he said.
Trask, who teaches law at the University of Manitoba, said eyewitness statements and preliminary evidence collected from an accident or crime scene can form the basis for an arrest. Officers can then detain a person for up to 24 hours as they continue to gather evidence and prepare charges, he said.
Police said early on that charges were anticipated in the crash, which happened at the intersection of provincial roads 201 and 306. A witness travelling behind the Ungers’ SUV told investigators the semi-truck appeared to be travelling at high speed.
Manaigre defended RCMP’s decision not to arrest Singh immediately, saying officers had no indication he would be a flight risk.
“Hindsight is always 20-20. When you look at, ‘OK, now he is running,’ Well, then of course we should have detained him, but when you can’t get information from the driver at the hospital … we can’t talk to him.”
He said it is not uncommon for people involved in accidents to be given time to recover from shock before they provide a statement to investigators.
“You’ll need probably those few days for your mind to come out of it and then hopefully you’ll start recollecting events, which is what you want,” Manaigre said. “If we actually went and arrested him, well now you’re starting the 24-hour clock and you’ve got 24 hours to deal with him. He has to be released or taken into custody … You haven’t accomplished anything.”
Manaigre said it may have been possible to arrest and charge Singh before having to release him, but such a move could compromise the case against him later on if it was rushed.
“I’d rather do things properly at the beginning,” he said.
Winnipeg defence lawyer Scott Newman said police often seek the opinion of an accident re-constructionist before determining whether a collision was criminal. Such examinations can include mechanical inspections of a vehicle and a review of the scene, he said.
Newman said it is too early to say for certain whether Singh is intentionally evading police.
“I have to be cautious because I don’t know what evidence the police had,” he said.
“I can imagine where if somebody gets out of an accident … you might want to go and see your family, you may want to go and see a lawyer and get legal advice from somebody you trust in your home community. I don’t think this is a situation where we can say he’s fled the country.”
Police said Singh holds a valid Ontario driver’s licence. They did not confirm whether he is a Canadian citizen.
How to Grow an Economy: “Refugee” Claimants Cost us $224.00 Per Day or $81,760 Per Year
People claiming to be refugees in Canada get $224.00 per day from our Government to eat and stay in a hotel room. That works out to be $81,760 per year. $20,000 more than the average Canadian Salary. Absolutely unbelievable.
Access to Canada was once a carefully managed privilege, considering individual character, national needs, and capacities. It took into account our ability to build houses and sustain population growth while maintaining infrastructure like education, transportation, and healthcare.
Immigrants didn’t always have degrees or higher education—take my grandparents, for instance, peasant farmers who fled post-WWI Poland. Back then, the government imposed rules about where immigrants could live. My grandparents spent five years in Edmonton to earn their citizenship before moving to Toronto and starting a family. My former father-in-law, a highly skilled electrician from Manchester, needed a sponsor to immigrate. His family of five initially shared a townhouse in Oakville with their sponsor before buying a home in rural Acton, where he later established a globally recognized airport runway lighting company.
Backed by solid financials, European Christian values, and a holistic approach to nation-building, immigrants thrived, contributing significantly to our nation. Now, we face what seems like a mass immigration invasion, straining our resources and infrastructure. We need a sound, manageable approach to immigration, not an overwhelming influx.
I’m tired of ineffective leadership and slogans that don’t address the real issues. No, Mr. Trudeau, we won’t let our nation be destroyed. No, Mr. Poilievre, we reject unrealistic housing solutions. No, Mr. Singh, your actions do not justify undermining Canada’s foundations. If you cherish Canada and want to preserve the country you grew up in, it’s time to reject these corrupt globalists. Vote for @MaximeBernier to protect our nation’s integrity and future
Access to Canada was once a carefully managed privilege, considering individual character, national needs, and capacities. It took into account our ability to build houses and sustain population growth while maintaining infrastructure like education, transportation, and healthcare.
Immigrants didn’t always have degrees or higher education—take my grandparents, for instance, peasant farmers who fled post-WWI Poland. Back then, the government imposed rules about where immigrants could live. My grandparents spent five years in Edmonton to earn their citizenship before moving to Toronto and starting a family. My former father-in-law, a highly skilled electrician from Manchester, needed a sponsor to immigrate. His family of five initially shared a townhouse in Oakville with their sponsor before buying a home in rural Acton, where he later established a globally recognized airport runway lighting company.
Backed by solid financials, European Christian values, and a holistic approach to nation-building, immigrants thrived, contributing significantly to our nation. Now, we face what seems like a mass immigration invasion, straining our resources and infrastructure. We need a sound, manageable approach to immigration, not an overwhelming influx.
I’m tired of ineffective leadership and slogans that don’t address the real issues. No, Mr. Trudeau, we won’t let our nation be destroyed. No, Mr. Poilievre, we reject unrealistic housing solutions. No, Mr. Singh, your actions do not justify undermining Canada’s foundations. If you cherish Canada and want to preserve the country you grew up in, it’s time to reject these corrupt globalists. Vote for @MaximeBernier to protect our nation’s integrity and future
The East Indian Invasion of Canada: A Longtime Subscriber Writes
Dear Paul,
Complete invasion of Indians from India in Niagara. I was at Holiday Inn Welland 3 nights a month who all Indians.
One at reception desk celebratIing one year here took a Canadians job.
A Chinese home owner in St Catherines said that she felt as if she was living in India now. She used to commute from Toronto to St Catherines last few years. Now the drive commute takes 4 hours not 2.
That is how long it took me to drive there one way — 4 hours.
Crystal Beach has been invaded last two years with Indians.
They bought the huge new 3-generations mansions.
Brampton has a high crime rate now with new immigrants so many Indians are moving to Niagara.
No expansion of the infrastructure of roads, hospitals etc to catch up.
No MORE GREEN SPACE for the environment or wild life or indigenous plants and trees microclimate.
This invasion is TO HELP TRUDEAU BRING IN MORE VOTERS LIKE OBAMA and KAMALA did for the next election. TO HELL WITH the damage to future young Canadians’ standard of life or loss of jobs.
Black Lives Matter NOW. I had art that was on loan to Kenderdine Art Gallery University of Saskatchewan 30 years for potential future donation now rejected because white artists like John Scott,
Eldon Garnett, Courtney Milne etc. They even rejected one First Nations artist by mistake because they did not know who he was. ha ha
What about hoards of Muslims invading would close down all religions churches and synagogues.
Not to mention the Third World ethics in paying taxes etc. running banks and governance services.
“The problem is that we, and I agree completely that we’ve had a global temperature increase in the 20th century – yes – but an increase from what. Probably an increase from the lowest point we’ve had for the last 10,000 years. And this means…that…it will be very hard, indeed, to prove whether the increase in temperature in the 20th century was man made, or it’s a natural variation. It will be very hard because we made ourselves an extremely poor experiment. We started to observe meteorology at the coldest spot in the last 10,000 years”.
Currently, as the rules stand, migrants from the United States can cross into Canada, wait two weeks, and become eligible to file a refugee claim here. The northern border sure must be looking like a home-free line, now that Donald Trump has been elected on a promise to carry out mass deportations of illegal migrants.
So, if there was ever a time Canada needed to send a very loud, very public, “no more Mr. Nice Guy” message to economically motivated asylum seekers — firm messaging backed up by policy changes to ward their numbers off — it’s right now.
The numbers are already too high. Last year, nearly 150,000 people staked refugee claims here, rendering us the fifth-largest destination for asylum seekers that year. Two years’ worth of asylum claims are inching their way through the immigration system, many of these from friendly not-at-war countries that have no business sending us thousands of refugees.
India, Nigeria, and Mexico are where the largest number of claims come from, but there are many others that shouldn’t be sending refugees our way. Each successful applicant — from friendly, at-peace countries — is a potential online advertisement for immigration services online; that is, potential inspiration for others looking to claim refugee status. Of course, many of these claimants aren’t actually in danger, as required by law, and are willing to travel home, prompting immigration consultants to make warnings against doing so.
With the threat of mass deportations from the U.S., and a policy in Canada that allows unauthorized residents to claim asylum should they lay low for 14 days, it’s only rational for would-be claimants to try. It could very well be a painful squeeze — the U.S. received 1.2 million asylum claims last year alone, and some fraction of that number can be expected to divert to the north come 2025.
The trek to Canada will be a rational one for many. To observers on the outside, we’re the country that welcomes everyone, hands out bags of free food, offers free care, has loads of jobs to fill along with land, oh so much land. We know this isn’t actually how Canada works, but they don’t.
Seriously. Extensive immigration influencer videos have advertised Canadian “free food” to those abroad, which have no doubt made this country a more attractive place to attempt asylum. Rent is often covered by the Canadian tax base as the wait for claim adjudication drags on — which ultimately puts low-income Canadians in competition with migrants for housing. Some also end up competing with homeless Canadians, taking up critical space in shelters from Vancouver to Toronto.
MANY OF THESE CLAIMANTS AREN’T ACTUALLY IN DANGER.
In health care, it’s a similar problem. These populations strain the health-care system: the Star reported last week that “Midwives and physicians in emergency departments said they’re seeing significantly more uninsured clients accessing care at later stages of a complicated pregnancy or an already developed cancer or AIDS.” The uninsured being, in part, migrants who are in Canada illegally. Bad deal for us, good deal for them.
Between rosy influencer advertising and borders-open messaging from our own Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, a lot more needs to be done to reverse the perception that Canada is a welcome home for economic “refugees.”
The incoming Trump administration has been strong out of the gate in turning around the perception of the United States as a bottomless bread basket of free amenities. Federal and state governments have rolled out unauthorized-friendly initiatives for a while now: feds have done their best to soften deportation rules, and some state governments have offered perks like pre-paid debit cards for migrants, as well as free rent. But Trump’s messaging has been clear that deportations are coming, and his border-enforcer-to-be, Tom Homan, is just as forceful: “You better start packing now, cause you’re going home,” Homan told a crowd earlier this year.
We haven’t been so firm. Visitor visa rules were tightened this week, but the home-free-in-twoweeks line remains in place.
Most of our country’s messaging includes tepid inward-facing assurances that everything is under control. The faceless blob that is the Canadian administrative state says there’s nothing to worry about: the RCMP learned from post-2016 migration which “provided us with the tools and insight necessary to address similar types of occurrences.” The Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) says, “we are ready to respond and adapt as needed.”
Homan, meanwhile, isn’t raving about our competency, stating in a recent TV interview that the northern border is an “extreme national security vulnerability” and that “tough conversations” are soon to be had with Canada.
Meanwhile, Immigration Minister Marc Miller is nonchalant, telling the Globe and Mail: “We will always be acting in the national interest and those measures that we move to undertake, regardless of what decision is taken by the new administration, to make sure that our borders are secure, that people that are coming to Canada do so in a regular pathway, and the reality that not everyone is welcome here.”
Well, that sure sends a message. “Not everyone is welcome here.”
Each statement from Canadian officials has the same bland, inoffensive lack of substance that could only come from either a comms department trained to generate few words of meaning or an AI text generator. None are backed by the force of strong, loophole-closing policy change.
Miller’s job right now isn’t just to soothe Canadians with words as bland as beige walls. He has to dispel years of false impressions of Canadian life inspired by a multitude of enthusiastic foreign-language Youtube and Tiktok howto vlogs about immigration, with rhetoric and hard policy. Right now, he’s falling short.