DIVERSITY AT WORK — SAY, WHAT’S HIS CITIZENSHIP? Ontario man allegedly broke into 3 homes and sexually assaulted residents in a single day
Ontario man allegedly broke into 3 homes and sexually assaulted residents in a single day
Mohamed Basil Lafir is suspected of exposing himself to one homeowner, sexually assaulting a second homeowner and assaulting an older female who was in bed in a third home
Mohamed Basil Lafir, 28, of no fixed address, is accused of breaking into homes in Oshawa and sexually assaulting multiple residents on Tuesday, Nov. 11, 2025. Photo by Durham Regional Police
A 28-year-old man has been arrested for allegedly entering several homes in a single day and sexually assaulting multiple victims in Oshawa, Ontario.
Mohamed Basil Lafir of no fixed address is charged with several suspected offences, including multiple break-and-enters, committing an indecent act, forcible confinement, and two sexual assaults.
Lafir was held after his arrest for a bail hearing.
The alleged crime spree unfolded on Nov. 11, according to Durham Regional Police. The service says it responded to calls received late Tuesday afternoon about a man entering homes and exposing himself.
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
The suspect entered one home and exposed himself to the residents before being startled by a dog and fleeing, says the DRPS in a release.
“The suspect then entered a second residence on the same street, where he sexually assaulted the homeowner when she confronted him.”
Afterward, he fled and entered a third home. While inside it, the suspect sexually assaulted an older female, who was in bed. He fled the third residence through the bedroom window.
When police arrived in the area, they located the suspect and took him into custody without incident.
Police are concerned there may be more victims.
However, the allegations have yet to be proven in court.
Anyone with information or video connected to these incidents is asked to contact the DPRS investigative division at 1-888-579-1520 ext. 2452. (NATIONAL POST, November 14, 2025))
An aerial photo of the dump site on Indian Road in North Cowichan taken on Oct. 7. SIXMOUNTAINS.CA
“There is only one road in and that road goes directly in front. The path of these twenty-nine thousand dump trucks goes directly in front of the tribal offices. Like, right in front. You cannot miss them if you’re in that office.” – Ben Mulroney
It appears as if the Cowichan Tribes aboriginal band has done the thing that humans do when there is no oversight or accountability: they lied and cheated and created an illegal grift (in the form of an illicit landfill site). But first, like all aboriginal bands, they demanded self-determination and refused any input, oversight, management or guidance from the government who pays for their fantasy well-fare nation. This was so they could get away with polluting and desecrating the land for money.
They stabbed all Canadians in the back. They selfishly and irresponsibly dumped waste and filth on lands the government should never have trusted these phony stewards to take care of.In a statement released on Monday, the culprits, the Cowichan Tribes, are urging the federal government to step in because there are “significant limitations” of what they can do. They are “First Nations” when they demand that non-aboriginals not be permitted to audit or oversee tax-payer transfers, or the general management of reserve lands, but they are meek victims of colonialism when it comes to most other aspects associated with functional nations.
Either way, Cowichan Tribes are attempting to pass the buck to Canadians. Their statement Monday included the following:“Pollution and contamination of reserve land is a generational, systemic and national problem.”The Cowichan Tribes are saying they want “Ottawa to fulfill its long overdue responsibility to take action to address the site.” Are you getting all this, settlers? We didn’t break the law, allow others to break the law, or desecrate the wilderness while claiming to be its sacred protectors. Nope. Canadians didn’t do that.
But according to the Cowichan Tribes, Canadians are on the hook to fix it anyway. Because of systemic, intergenerational, and other such nonsense social justice talking points, non-aboriginal Canadians, those dastardly colonizers, must pay for and clean up the disgusting, irresponsible and dangerous illegal dump in which aboriginals are 100% responsible. James Anthony Peter, an aboriginal and member of Cowichan Tribes, is the man who controls access to the illegal dump site. Cowichan Tribes claims to have repeatedly issued him cease-and-desist letters since 2010. It’s been 15 years of thousands of dump trucks driving past the Cowichan Tribes head office on their way to the illegal dump, and in all that time this “First Nation” was only able to muster up unenforced cease-and-desist letters.
Are readers starting to see that aboriginal “nations” fall well short of what all other nations are expected to rise up to? Do readers even believe that the Cowichan Tribes did anything meaningful to stop this illegal landfill? In my view, it is a safe conjecture that they were all in on it, that the band did little to stop Peter, and most likely profited along with him.According to a 2023 environmental report, “the illegal dump site at 5544 Indian Road has ballooned to 290,000 cubic metres of debris, including concrete, tires, household garbage, and construction waste. The report warns the material poses a contamination risk to the nearby Cowichan River.” And according to Times Colonist, this debris contains “elevated concentrations of copper and zinc and other ‘substances of concern,’ including heavy metals such as arsenic, cadmium, iron, lead and manganese, according to recent environmental reports…
Two independent environmental reports indicate the site is producing leachate that’s migrating via groundwater toward the Cowichan River.”Aboriginals need to be governed, audited, managed, supervised, treated with suspicion, held accountable, and spoken directly to with facts and evidence. This is no different from non-aboriginal people. All humans must be monitored, not all the time like Big Brother, but some of the time to ensure rules, standards, and best-practices are being followed and utilized. There are no blameless people. There are no equity-deservers who are justified in breaking the law. When it comes to the modern concerns and operation of this nation, aboriginal elders, traditional ways of knowing, self-determination, aboriginal land stewardship, truth and reconciliation, and a boat load of other even more useless things, have no place in its proper functioning or prosperity.The band is responsible for this mess, but are demanding that non-aboriginal Canadians clean it up.
I say we should indeed clean up the Cowichan land-fill. I say non-aboriginal Canadians should pay for it. It needs to be done right, and when you want things done right you don’t call people who don’t/can’t do things right. Why have we lost faith in our people? Would a whole community of Anglo or Franco Canadians do what these irresponsible Cowichan aboriginals did? Everyone knows they wouldn’t. So, let’s clean up the land that the aboriginals treated so carelessly, before dangerous chemicals leech into the nearby rivers, let’s restore that wilderness to its original pristine state, let’s make it sacred like only non-aboriginal Canadians can.
But then, and this is the greater act of cleanup, let’s revoke the Cowichan band’s self-determination and “nation” status, and start involving ourselves in audits and managerial processes concerning this dishonest land-desecrating band. They are not stewards of the land, they are grifters involved in criminal enterprise. They care nothing about Canada. Nobody who does would dump refuge in its immaculate undefiled wilderness.As stated above, I think it is clear that the Cowichan band knew about the illegal dump and profited from it. They sold out the forest, they sold out Canada.
Ben Mulroney said it best, “the due-diligence phase of our relationship in terms of reconciliation has come upon us and we need to know what you knew. Where is the money, how much do you have, where is it going?…real reconciliation doesn’t happen unless you open the books.”Last week I published a piece by Nina Green where she examined a question concerning the Cowichan band and private land ownership in B.C. Nina wrote, “Does the Cowichan case indicate that private property is on the table for reconciliation?” As it turns out, according to Nina, “Clearly, for AFN Grand Chief Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak, private property is on the table for reconciliation.” The same band that treats its own land so carelessly and disrespectful is coming after your land. What could this possibly mean for the future of Canada?
Will we all have illegal aboriginal dumps in our back yards? Will we have to ship in clean water from Alaska due to all the leeching chemicals from these sites? Will we continue to call the worst polluters in Canadian history, “stewards of the land,” or will some of these endlessly repeated false slogans finally be outed for the silly nonsense they are?The bigger questions, and the only ones really worth asking, do not concern individual aboriginal bands, regardless of how awful and reckless they may be. The bigger question concerns the structure of aboriginal-non-aboriginal relations. Questions like why do we deploy such manipulative language when it comes to all things aboriginal? For example, these are poor, under-developed, well-fare recipients. Under what rationale do they make nations? How can they be nations when they are barely even functioning communities? They are crucibles of deprivation and criminality.
Turning to the clown show at Thompson Rivers University where yesterday OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, wrongfully terminated Professor Frances Widdowson, and illiberally cancelled high school teacher Jim McMurtry were screamed at and drowned out by aboriginal activists, students and professors, who are obsessed with believing that 215 murdered aboriginal children were clandestinely buried in an apple orchard at the site of the former Kamloops Indian Residential school. These sick people do not take it as good news that the claim of 215 murdered former IRS students is not true. They desire for it to be true. They need it to be true. They have shaped a narrative that informs their entire conception of Canada and their view of the world at large by this anti-Canadian, anti-Christian, anti-white false story of child murder and coverup.
From a report this morning filed by Alex Zoltan for Juno News:“What began as a peaceful free speech event quickly spiralled into verbal assaults, drumming, and foot-stomping as angry protesters hurled obscenities like “You f***ing white man!” to drown out discussion.”Is this what members of respectable nations do? Scream over people and bang on drums to avoid hearing things they find unpleasant? I noticed a comment on the report above which seems to encapsulate what I would guess would be the majority sentiment in Canada:“Is the Canadian taxpayer expected to pay their taxes and shut their f–king mouth?”It’s a million dollar question. Clearly the aboriginal industry would love to see just this.
However, as I recently wrote in these pages, Canadians are becoming increasingly fatigued by aboriginals and their politics, by the illiberal collectivism, the double standards, the lies and deliberately perpetrated hoaxes, by Truth and Reconciliation, by special status, advantages and privileges wasted on dependent people who produce little.
Clearly we need to Stand Up To The Orange Shirts. We need deep constitutional change in this country when it comes to how we deal with aboriginals. They need to be put in their place, stripped of their illiberal collective rights, and forced to conform to the same laws and standards as the rest of Canada. Nothing will change until we take the battle to new ground, alter the discourse, dismiss this broken reconciliation process, and replace it with good old truth and accountability.
Let’s be quite clear. The only slavery since Canada became and independent Dominion in 1867 was on the part of West Coast Indians owning other Indians as slaves well into the 19th Century. In 1794, Sir John Graves Simcoe abolished slavery in the forming British colony of Upper Canada. This was 40 years before the mother country would abolish slavery throughout the British Empire in 1834.
Writing in the National Post (June 13, 2025) N.W. Liston recounted : “Jody Wilson-Raybould’s father describes the pride he felt in 1951, sitting on his grandfather’s knee as he was served by his slaves. Indigenous produced programs on APTN have begun noting the power the Haida (who ranged as far as northern California on raids) possessed when Haida Gwai’s population was 25% slave. One recent episode on local tribal wars reconstructs memorable battles such as the luring of a large (1000?) raiding party into Maple Bay near Duncan, where a 3 sided trap was sprung from land and water, the slaughter turning the water of the bay red. The victorious alliance, fed up with constant raiding, then finalized the solution by “marrying” the wives of the dead. Surprisingly, “Blood in the Water” the estimated date of this battle of around 1850.
Reconciliation can only take place between real peoples, not the distorted, grotesque caricatures produced by both ignorance and design. Understanding the “other” does not come from projecting your own stereotypical image in the absence of actual experience, but formed bit by bit from real encounters with real people and attempts to see the world from another’s point of view, not assuming theirs is the same as yours. Ghosts are not your friends.”
West Coast slaves — Indians owned by other Indians!
Negro slavery? We never did it. It was abolished 73 years before we even became a Dominion. No apology. No way! No more White Guilt.
An additional acknowledgment
National Post
13 Nov 2025
Just as Indigenous land acknowledgments become a ubiquitous aspect of Canadian life, activists are attempting to normalize a second acknowledgment that would similarly precede every single speech, meeting or public event in the country.
This was on view at the City of Toronto’s official Remembrance Day ceremony at Toronto City Hall.
After a standard land acknowledgment mentioning the various First Nations whose traditional territories overlap with the City of Toronto, attendees were also asked to acknowledge “those who were brought here involuntarily; particularly those brought to these lands as a result of the TransAtlantic slave trade and slavery.”
While Toronto does indeed sit atop land that used to be Indigenous, the historical claims in the slavery acknowledgment are less accurate.
As outlined in a recent report for the Aristotle Foundation, African slavery was never a defining feature of Canada, particularly as compared to the United States.
The generally accepted view of historians is that, over 200 years, a total of 7,000 African slaves were owned in the French and English colonies that would eventually form Canada.
In contrast to the U.S., Canada’s contemporary Black population is comprised mostly of people who trace their lineage through Caribbean immigrants, or freed U.S. slaves who settled in Canada.
What’s more, Canada became one of the first jurisdictions on earth with an explicit sanction against human bondage. The 1793 Act Against Slavery, passed by the colonial legislature of Upper Canada, would end up representing the British Empire’s legislative first step toward its ultimate ban on slavery in 1834; 33 years before Confederation.
As noted by the Aristotle Foundation, the much more prevalent form of slavery in pre-confederation Canada was the version practised by Indigenous societies — iterations of which could be found on the West Coast well into the 19th century.
Nevertheless, the City of Toronto is one of several Canadian institutions that is still attempting to normalize a “slavery acknowledgment” in addition to standard Indigenous land acknowledgments.
Starting in 2018, the city codified the text of an “African Ancestral Acknowledgement” that was to be used to open public events, provided it was “delivered by a person of African descent.”
If no such person could be found, a non-black person is instructed to pre-empt the acknowledgment with the line “though I am not a person of African descent, I am committed to continually acting in support of and in solidarity with Black communities seeking freedom and reparative justice in light of the history and ongoing legacy of slavery that continues to impact Black communities in Canada.”
Similar acknowledgments can also be found in various Toronto non-profits and government agencies.
The Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation, for one, has a section on its website devoted to acknowledging slavery, even while noting that said slavery usually didn’t happen in Canada. “We acknowledge the experiences of Black peoples who arrived in Canada seeking a better life following the abolition of slavery by the British in 1834, while also recognizing the structural, systemic, and individual racism that they encountered,” it reads.
Nova Scotia, long a centre of Canadian Black life due to its large pre-confederation communities of freed slaves, has also seen several institutions flirting with slavery acknowledgments.
The officially recommended land acknowledgment provided by the Nova Scotia chapter of CUPE, for instance, mentions the forcible displacement and enslavement of people of African descent,” adding “much of the privilege many of us have in this space stems from colonialism in the past and today, and in the oppression of Black & African Nova Scotian people.”
Dalhousie University has drafted an official African land acknowledgment stating that “African Nova Scotians are a distinct people whose histories, legacies and contributions have enriched that part of Mi’kma’ki known as Nova Scotia for over 400 years.”
While land acknowledgments are now standard practice across Canadian legislative session, city hall meetings, church services, airline flights and even hockey games, they’ve notably never taken hold in the United States outside of the occasional corporate boardroom or academic gathering.
In a January op-ed for The New York Times, Indigenous history professor Kathleen Duval said that even this scattered usage had outlived its usefulness. Wrote Duval, “they’ve begun to sound more like rote obligations, and Indigenous scholars tell me there can be tricky politics involved with naming who lived on what land and who their descendants are.”
Canadian views are more sanguine. Polls show that Canadians generally welcome land acknowledgments as a gesture of Indigenous reconciliation, even if they object to notions that they live on “stolen” land. A June survey by the Association for Canadian Studies found that 52 per cent of Canadians rejected the assertion that they lived on stolen Indigenous land.
MAN WHO PAID TO ILLEGALLY EXTEND WORK PERMIT NOT ENTITLED TO MONEY BACK, COURT RULES
TWO MEN CALLED ‘EQUALLY AT FAULT’ BY JUDGE
National Post
13 Nov 2025
[This is a sordid story of the widespread scamming, especially on the part of East Indians of the student visas, the temporary foreign workers programme and Canada’s porous “refugee” system. Fraudulent documents are sold for a fortune and, of course, it’s these people who are scamming and exploiting their own people. The whole temporary foreign workers programme, except for agriculture should be cancelled.]
A worker from India paid a fixer $15,000 to extend his work permit in Canada and then sued after being refused a promised letter of endorsement from the City of Grande Prairie. A court has ruled he cannot get his money back.
An Indian man who paid a fixer $15,000 in a failed attempt to extend his work permit in Canada entered into an “illegal contract” and is not entitled to get his money back, according to a recent decision from Alberta’s Court of Justice.
Ritik Sibbal sued Rajiv Chourhary Nathyal because the letter of endorsement from the City of Grande Prairie that Nathyal had agreed to help him obtain never materialized.
“Sibbal understood that a letter of endorsement would allow him to continue to work in Canada after his (postgraduate work permit) expired and potentially obtain permanent residency. Sibbal told the court that Nathyal agreed that the $15,000 he provided would be returned if a letter of endorsement was not obtained. The application for Sibbal’s letter of endorsement was refused; however, Nathyal never returned the money to Sibbal,” Justice Susanne Stushnoff wrote in a recent decision out of Edmonton.
“Sibbal was very poised before the court and presented as a smart and articulate individual. He was motivated to enter into an illegal contract due to his authentic desire to become a permanent resident of Canada. However, one of the elements that makes Canada such a desirable place to live is its legal system,” the judge wrote in her decision, dated Nov. 7.
Nathyal was served with notice of the lawsuit, but failed to defend himself.
Sibbal testified that he “came to Canada in April 2019 to attend business college in Vancouver.”
After graduating, he obtained a work permit that was good for three years.
His goal was to obtain a work permit before that expired that would allow him to stay in Canada and obtain permanent residency here.
Sibbal moved to Grande Prairie in August 2023 under the understanding that the city in northwestern Alberta “was considered ‘rural,’ ” and that he might only need a letter of endorsement to work past the expiration of his postgraduate work permit.
Letters of endorsement support “a foreign national’s job offer and their application for permanent residence under a specific immigration program,” said the decision.
Sibbal got several jobs in Grande Prairie, believing his employers would help him obtain the proper documentation, said the decision.
When those fell through, Sibbal only had six months left on his postgraduate work permit, which was set to expire in August 2024, said the decision. “He became anxious about his path forward.”
Sibbal called several immigration lawyers in Edmonton, one of whom pointed him to Nathyal in Grande Prairie.
The two met in early 2024 and Nathyal offered to help Sibbal obtain a letter of endorsement so he could stay in Canada, said the decision. The price: $35,000. “Sibbal offered Nathyal $15,000 in advance with the remainder to be paid in instalments over the next few months.”
Sibbal testified that he had “no choice” but to agree to the offer as his work permit “was soon to expire and it was his father’s dream for him to obtain permanent residency in Canada.”
Nathyal told Sibbal he was going to get him a letter of endorsement from “the relevant authorities at the City of Grande Prairie,” said the decision.
“According to Sibbal, Nathyal was to obtain the letter of endorsement by telling the authorities that he was going to employ Sibbal. This was not the truth. Nathyal was never going to be Sibbal’s employer.”
Sibbal testified that he didn’t get anything in writing about their contract. “He explained that Nathyal would not allow anything in writing as both of them knew that the contract they were entering into was ‘illegal.’ ”
Sibbal paid Nathyal $15,000 in cash in February 2024, said the decision, which notes Nathyal refused to provide a receipt.
Sibbal “heard nothing” from Nathyal for several months, despite repeated attempts to reach him. After he managed to get through, Nathyal told him to “wait for a few more weeks.”
Nathyal called Sibbal at the end of July 2024, saying
NATHYAL WOULD NOT ALLOW ANYTHING IN WRITING.
Grande Prairie had refused the letter of endorsement.
When he met with Nathyal in August 2024, “Nathyal advised that he proceed with a ‘fake refugee case,’ ” said the decision.
Sibbal “consulted with his parents who wisely advised him not to go down this path,” it said.
He called Nathyal to say he wouldn’t pursue a refugee claim, then asked him for help obtaining a labour market impact assessment. That’s a “document that a Canadian employer may need to get before hiring a foreign worker,” according to the decision.
When Nathyal told him that would cost an extra $35,000 to $40,000, “Sibbal indicated that this was ‘outside of (his) budget for now,’ ” said the decision.
When he asked about getting his $15,000 back, Nathyal told him to give him a month and a half.
“Over the following two weeks Sibbal followed up with Nathyal on multiple occasions,” said the decision. “Nathyal would respond periodically but never returned the money.”
The last time Sibbal heard from Nathyal was on Sept. 12, 2024.
“Nathyal texted Sibbal stating that he did not receive the payment he had purportedly been waiting on,” said the decision, which notes Sibbal told the court he was returning to India.
The judge found “that the contract between Sibbal and Nathyal was breached,” but she refused to enforce it.
The two men “were equally at fault in these circumstances,” Stushnoff said.
“Although Sibbal framed his pleadings and testimony in a way that cast a sympathetic light upon him, I find that Sibbal was a willing buyer and Nathyal was a willing seller.”
Sibbal “did not come before this court with ‘clean hands,’ and I exercise my discretion and refuse to grant the equitable relief he has sought,” said the judge.
The court “has a responsibility to preserve the integrity of the legal system, and this involves ensuring that claims seeking to enforce illegal contracts or unjust enrichment claims based on illegal contracts do not result in an inconsistency in the law,” the judge said,
“Submitting fake job offers or employment contracts, providing advice to do so, and charging fees beyond those expressly permitted by the legislation are all illegal under Canada’s immigration legislation and undermine the integrity of the Canadian immigration system. The monetization of Canada’s immigration system is against Canada’s public policy.”
Grande Prairie paused its Rural Renewal Stream Immigration program this past February, citing “federal and provincial immigration policy changes that have lowered immigration allocation spaces throughout the province.”
Published: November 12, 2025 at 12:59PM ESTPolice say ‘a groups of individuals’ were responsible for the killing of 46-year-old Abdul Aleem Farooqi back in August.
Police in York Region say they’ve arrested five suspects wanted in connection with a home invasion in Vaughan that resulted in the death of a father of four over the summer.
The incident happened on Aug. 31, at a residence near Andreeta Drive and Barons Street, north of Major MacKenzie Drive West, in Kleinberg.
According to York Regional Police (YRP), a number of suspects arrived at a home in that area in a vehicle that had been stolen days earlier in Toronto.
The suspects, one of whom allegedly carried a gun, then forced their way into the dwelling, YRP said.
A man inside, identified by police as 46-year-old Abdul Aleem Farooqi, was shot and died at the scene. Police have said that several members of his family were also inside the home at that time.
Police are investigating after a 46-year-old man was fatally shot in his Kleinberg home on Aug. 31.
On Wednesday, Insp. Paolo Fiore, of YRP’s homicide unit, announced that three men and two youths are in custody in connection with the incident.
One of those individuals, 26-year-old Mississauga resident Amir Wiam Mohammad Abuhmaid, is charged with first-degree murder and several other related offences.
“At the time of the homicide, Mr. Abuhmaid was out on four separate forms of release,” Fiore said during the news conference.
Insp. Paolo Fiore, of York Regional Police’s Homicide Unit, speaks during a Nov. 12 news conference.
Choszen Roshan Phillip, 25, and two 16-year-old boys, all from Toronto, have also been charged with possession of property obtained by crime over $5,000.
Lastly, Jahvon St. Patrick McNairn, 34, also of Toronto, has been charged with accessory after the fact of robbery with a firearm.
Those individuals are not facing charges in the homicide itself.
The charges have not been tested in court.
Fiore said police made the arrests after executing five search warrants at three residences in Toronto and Mississauga on Monday.
Teen, ‘multiple’ others outstanding
Fiore said police are still searching for 16-year-old Jayshaun Williams, of Toronto, who is also wanted for first-degree murder and robbery with a firearm.
Investigators have obtained a special court order to temporarily identify the teen, whom they believe is still in the Greater Toronto Area.
“If anyone knows the whereabouts of Jayshaun Williams, please contact our investigators,” he said.
“Jayshaun, we will find you. It’s time to contact a lawyer and turn yourself in.”
Police say they believe there are “multiple” other suspects.
“Our homicide investigators, with the assistance of members from our Criminal Investigation bureaus, never stopped working, their persistence, dedication, and unwavering commitment will continue. This type of investigation requires significant time, expertise, and collaboration across multiple investigative units,” Fiore said.
Victim’s brother speaks out
After the police news conference, the victim’s brother, Naeem, spoke out, thanking officers for their work in apprehending the suspects and calling for reform.
“We hope they are held accountable for their actions and not released into the public,” he said in a written statement provided to CTV News Toronto.
“We need to ensure Canadians feel safe in their homes and no other family should experience the nightmare we have been living since August 31st.“
Naeem Farooqi, brother of fatal shooting victim Aleem Farooqi, speaks with CTV News Toronto on Sept. 2.
Chief calls for bail system, violent crime law reform
On Wednesday afternoon, YRP Chief Jim MacSween said the fact that the adult offender charged with first-degree murder in this case was out on four different types of release orders shows there’s a need for change.
“I’m incredibly disappointed that dangerous criminals are continuously released back into the community, only to reoffend and revictimize the public,” he said during the news conference, adding it’s “extremely concerning” that a 16-year-old youth is wanted in connection with this incident.
“We’re seeing the perpetrators become increasingly younger, while the severity of these crimes continues to escalate.”
York Regional Police Chief Jim MacSween speaks during a Nov. 12 news conference.
MacSween said changes are needed to prevent violent offenders from returning to the streets only to reoffend again, as well as harsher penalties to deter them from committing “these atrocious acts in the first place.”
“Last month, the federal government announced legislation that would see reforms to the current bail system. We are encouraged by this step forward and will continue to advocate for a system that prioritizes public safety and keeps dangerous criminals where they belong,” he said.
“As this legislation is developed, we will keep our eyes laser focused to ensure these changes protect our community. We’ll continue to advocate for the continued changes necessary, and we’ll work with our provincial and federal partners to ensure the system protects our residents and puts community safety first.”
Del Duca speaks out
In a statement posted on X, Vaughan Mayor Steven Del Duca thanked police for making arrests in this incident, which he called a “senseless act” that “shattered a family and shook our entire community,” and urged anyone with further information to contact the authorities.
He also added that today’s announcement reinforces his previous calls for bail reform.
“Too many repeat offenders are out on bail because of our current ‘catch and release’ system – a broken approach that allows dangerous individuals to reoffend,” he said, calling on all federal MPs to support the “Bail and Sentencing Reform Act,” known as Bill C-14, that is currently before the House of Commons.
“Too many criminals commit crimes with little or no consequence. This must change—urgently. … Dangerous criminals must be kept off our streets and behind bars where they belong. Vaughan residents should not – and will not – accept this level of violence in our community or anywhere in Canada.”
Simon Fraser University fully embraced race-based hiring with an advertisement for a faculty position exclusively restricted to black applicants.
s.
A tenure-track posting in philosophy says the competition is limited to applicants who “self-identify as Black.” Applicants must first complete an “Applicant Demographic Survey.”
Another posting in the school of criminology applies the same race restriction, warning that candidates who do not complete the survey “will not be considered.”
The posting states that the demographic survey responses will be used to determine their “appropriateness for [the] position,” alongside their experience and qualifications
Simon Fraser University says race-restricted hiring is part of a special program supported by the B.C. Human Rights Commissioner. The university received approval from the commissioner to “limit recruitment.”
Simon Fraser University plans to hire at least “15 Black tenure-track faculty and 15 Black staff” by 2028 to address what it calls “systemic discrimination.”
The demographic survey asks applicants to report Indigenous identity, racial identity, gender identity, sexual orientation and disability status. The postings say these questions help the university meet Canada Research Chairs targets to “enhance equity” and “remove systemic barriers to recruitment.”
Earlier this year, the Aristotle Foundation tracked identity-restricted academic postings. Its preliminary assessment report found that nearly one in five postings at the University of British Columbia limited eligibility to a specific identity group.
Mark Milke, president of the Aristotle Foundation, told True North that “there’s nothing wrong with diversity in an organic sense. What’s wrong with something like \[diversity, equity, and inclusions\] or race-conscious hiring is it looks at people, not as individuals, but as part of some predetermined group; race, ethnicity—and in some cases, religion.”
Milke noted that parts of Canada abandoned race-consciousness as far back as the 19th century. “Governor Douglas in British Columbia welcomed black Americans from California. They were not race-conscious,” he said. “They could become citizens after two years, they could vote in school board elections, run as a trustee, and run for city council.”
In Ontario, Milke said, efforts to prohibit workplace race and sex-based discrimination began in the 1950s. “The existence of, say, personal prejudice is not akin to systemic discrimination,” he said. “DEI advocates keep conflating systemic discrimination with occasional instances of personal bigotry.”
According to Milke, an example of true systemic discrimination would be when “white San Franciscans would not allow Chinese San Franciscans into white hospitals a century ago. That was systemic but that doesn’t exist in Canada today.”
The Aristotle Foundation study says that Ottawa tied university funding to DEI rules starting in 2017, pushing campuses to meet equity targets. By 2019, some Canada Research Chairs were being limited to applicants from designated identity groups. It notes that government DEI pages describe designated identity groups but do not set criteria for viewpoint diversity in hiring or research.
Simon Fraser University did not respond to a request for comment.
Truth and Reconciliation is an expression well known not just in relation to South Africa, but in Canada as well, over the last couple of decades. On the 7th of November, 2025, I did a one-woman protest action in front of the community centre in my little hometown in north-eastern British Columbia, where there was a large gathering of Aboriginal folks from other areas of this province. There are many names for the Aboriginal peoples of Canada. They generally have been called Indians, or they are referred to as Native, Indigenous, or First Nations (which they are NOT, but that is a whole other topic). Before relating to you my little event, some background to Truth and Reconciliation in Canada is necessary.
The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC) was established in 2008, and the final report of the seven-year process of gathering testimonies all across the country from thousands of people associated with the Indian Residential School (IRS) system was published in 2015. Many recommendations were made as a result of the TRC.
This 75-minute video has valuable reference material with regards to UNDRIP (United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples) and the graves story.
On May 27, 2021, the Kamloops Indian band announced to the world that they had discovered 215 unmarked graves at the site of the former Indian Residential School in Kamloops. Headlines quickly turned to “mass graves” and flags were lowered to half mast, remaining there for the longest period in Canadian history during peace-time. The anti-White hatred went into super-charge, and White guilt took on whole new dimensions. We are no longer just “colonizers” or “settlers” who “stole the land”, but now we are being called “uninvited guests” in the country that our ancestors built. Court cases are currently causing all kinds of uncertainty about the status of people’s private property, some public areas such as provincial parks are being declared off-limits to non-native people during certain periods of time, and streets and plazas are being renamed to names which nobody can pronounce. Over 100 churches were burnt or vandalized during the year following that announcement, but that was “understandable” according to then Prime Minister of Canada Justin Trudeau.
The only trouble with the Kamloops unmarked graves story is that none of these so-called graves have been investigated. The original claim was made after ground-penetrating radar found anomalies. Nothing has been excavated, in spite of 12 million dollars having been given to the Kamloops band specifically to investigate the graves. Why have they not done any digging? I have heard them say that the spirits should not be disturbed, and that they would rather carry out ceremonies to guide the children’s spirits home. However, could it be that they, the Natives, simply do not want to dig, because they fear they will not find any skeletons? Could those anomalies detected by the ground penetrating radar be old tree roots from the orchard? or old septic field lines? How can we know, if nobody digs?
I have been talking quite a lot about these issues over the past few years, as it concerns me greatly that we in Canada are being accused of having committed genocide, and laws have even been introduced which, if passed, will land you in jail for questioning these graves or for questioning their atrocity stories about the schools or for saying anything positive about the schools. This sounds very much like the Holocaust denial laws! Even the language is similar – “Residential School Denial” – that is what they are in the process of criminalizing.
In these “the Flipside with Monika” broadcasts on RBN the Republic Broadcasting Network, here, here, here, and here, this was the main topic. Also, these interviews with Jim Rizoli, here and here.
****************************************
The above background gives context to my little action. I made a two-sided sign, and strolled along the public side-walk in front of the community centre with my sign. The action lasted about 45 minutes. The photo here was taken on the edge of town, before going on location.
Just four words. No Reconciliation without Truth. Does that sound offensive to you, dear reader? Are there any problems there? Is it logical? Can we have reconciliation without truth?
Likely you think, why on earth is she asking these silly questions. The answers are self-evident are they not? Well, evidently, some people do get very offended, and I witnessed it first hand.
The other side of the sign also had just four words: Unmarked Graves?? Evidence Please!!
Here is a quick summary of some of my encounters today. I wish I had had a videographer along to document the whole event, but here it is from memory.
The first Native man who saw me (I’ll call him Man#1) approached with a big smile on his face and thumbs up. I expressed my delight that he liked my sign. I had the “no reconciliation without truth” side facing him. He liked it a lot. I then showed him the other side with “unmarked graves?? evidence please!!” and he really liked that too. He was beaming ear-to-ear. Again I expressed my joy that he was with me on these simple but important messages. He asked if he could give me a hug, and of course I accepted his big bear-hug. This was such a heart-warming start to my little action.
Over to my left I could see that people were peering curiously at us from the other side of the glass windows of the entrance lobby. People were milling about, walking in and out of the doors, as well as going to and fro, between the Legion across the street where some of their activities were taking place, and the community centre. Children were playing off to one side near the big wall tent that the organizers had set up next to the building. The children saw me and they waved and smiled. I waved and smiled back. It was all very pleasant. Alas, that was about to change.
From the entrance lobby, a Native man (I’ll call him Man#2) came marching over to me, and looked my sign up and down (the “Truth” side) and demanded in a hostile tone, “what are you doing here?! what is this?! why are you here?!” I simply responded by pointing at the message and saying that it was important to have truth in order to have reconciliation. I do not remember his precise words back, but something to the effect of “What! Your truth!? What are you talking about?!” He was clearly VERY offended by those four words, “no reconciliation without truth”.
I calmly turned the sign to show him the other side, and asked if there was evidence to support the unmarked graves story. I told him that I was interested in seeing evidence. His hostility grew. I was regaled with
“We have our memories! We have our stories – these things happened! We have Elders and – are you accusing them all of being liars?!?!”
This he practically screamed in my face. At some point during his ranting and raving, I couldn’t help but to chuckle a little, and that really got him hopping mad!
“And you are laughing at us!”
When things were calmer again, I asked why do they not use the money that the government gave to them, earmarked for the investigation, and do an excavation and find the evidence. He was extremely hostile in response to that suggestion. He repeatedly talked about their memories and their stories, and demanded an answer from me regarding his accusation that we are calling the Elders and the “survivors” all liars if we do not believe them. This discussion was clearly going nowhere.
Man#1 was still standing there next to Man#2, and he was looking bewildered and uncomfortable. I told Man#2 that this man (motioning towards Man#1) had really liked my sign and had given me a hug, and had no hostility towards me at all. Then Man#1 stammered that he hadn’t really understood my meaning, but he couldn’t explain what he meant by that. He was now siding with Man#2, but was clearly confused. He was not overtly hostile at all, just had a very troubled look on his face. At this point I must say I felt sorry for him.
Man#2 took his cell phone out to take a picture of me in an intimidating manner as though he expected that I should want to run and hide from his desire to document my presence. I think I took a bit of the wind out of his sail when I stood proud, and smiled beside my sign, posing for the photo. and said,
“I’m proud of my sign.”
After he snapped the photo, I turned the sign to show the other side and posed again with an even bigger smile.
What I witnessed happening there between Man#1 and Man#2 was a small but extremely important example of how “group think” works, and how peer pressure will affect people’s perceptions, memories, feelings, the very way that they think and behave. The video linked above – and here again – is called ‘UNDRIP and the Graves. Reference Material‘. In it, there is a description of the TRC sign which was prominently displayed at the entrance of the hearing rooms as the IRS testimonials were gathered across Canada. That sign would set the stage for the participants, suggesting that these schools were terrible places, where terrible things happened. There is little doubt that this would have had a dampening effect on anyone who might possibly have wanted to tell about their positive experiences, and it would certainly have helped them “remember”, even if by hearsay, that these were terrible places. That specific topic discussion beginning at approximately minute 9 in the video lasts for about six minutes. (Incidentally, immediately following that section, comes an interesting fact about Robert Carney, the father of the current Prime Minister. This video was made before Mark Carney became PM.) The entire video is well worth the hour and a quarter to watch, but if you are strapped for time, you might like to check out those bits, especially in relation to the peer pressure which I just described above.
Back to my little action. Other Natives started coming over to take a closer look. Many short conversations took place. Some just told me that I was not welcome there and that I was trespassing and should go away. I responded that I was on public property and had no intention of interfering with their event or activities. Some talked with me, but none were friendly like Man#1. I pointed out to the growing throng that they were being instrumentalized by the government who was actually at war against the Caucasian Race, and that they were being used as instruments of that war. The government was trying to divide us all and get us all to hate one another, I told them. I explained that they would not likely be better off with the replacement population who were being brought into the country.
One native fellow accompanied a woman who passed closely by me and loudly sputtered that he was there to protect her from my verbal abuse. I smiled at them.
An elderly native woman approached me with her walker and with glowering eyes told me that she attended the Kamloops school! She paused in such a way as though awaiting my shocked gasp, like as if she had just told me she got struck by a fire-breathing dragon. When the expected gasp of horror did not come, she continued,
“there was abuse there!”
I asked her why the Indian band had lobbied the government to keep the school open when it was to be closed. I also asked her why so many former students attended the school reunion several years after the school closed. Would they really have wanted to attend a joyful reunion if it was such a traumatic – and genocidal – place?
Several Natives accosted me with statements like “there are chiiiillllldren here!” drawing out that word in such a dire tone, that a blind passerby might have thought I was engaging in a violent freak show or perhaps pornography! [Oh, but wait, a pornographic display might have been okay with them, given what is being fed to our children (presumably their children too) right in the public schools – but I digress.]
A White woman walked by and practically spit her words at me “you are a HATER!”
A White man was the most upset of all, and he just yelled at me.
“We stole their land! And my wife was a 60’s scoop baby! We stole their land! And then we stole their babies! And we’re still stealing their babies!”
I told him (or tried to speak in between his outbursts, at least for the benefit of other people nearby who might have been listening) that I personally know a “60’s scoop” woman who is very grateful that she was adopted and raised by a White family, because she was aware that she had a much better upbringing than she could ever have had with her biological family, who were completely dysfunctional. She was doing very well in life, because of her loving adoptive family, who happened to raise her with a deep appreciation and knowledge of her people and their traditions and culture. Does that sound like it was genocide? Why would White families adopt these children that are in precarious situations, where perhaps the parents are either absent or drunk or abusive? Could it be because our people care?
Another sidebar: I personally know of several White families who have adopted native children who came out of terrible circumstances, and in each and every case the adopting family did it out of love and care. These children were not stolen! And in many cases these loving White families are rewarded for their care with life-long difficulties associated with their FAS-affected (Fetal Alcohol Syndrome) adopted children. That is of course blamed on the “evil White man” as well. They will blame the parents’ alcoholism on their school experiences, and that they are “survivors”.
When does the blaming stop, and when should a people assume responsibility? Do the German people assume victimhood status and whine to the world about being bombed and burned during that long war also known as WW1 and WW2? No! Instead, the Germans are industrious and are still paying reparations to a certain group of people who are ALWAYS the victim while perpetrating war and destruction and genocide on others, and if we notice, then we are called anti-semitic. But I digress again.
I will never say that there was never an abuse. Of course not, because one cannot say that about any institution or any group or any school! But systemic abuse? Genocide? Murder? Secret burials by night? These are serious allegations, and it behooves us to demand evidence, and it behooves the accusers to provide that evidence. Thus far, there has been obfuscation and non-stop wailing about the evil White man and multi-generational trauma.
About those children who were allegedly being traumatized by my mere presence, I must say, the cheerful and carefree smiles and waves were a most interesting display of trauma. They did not even run away when I smiled and waved back. I cannot help but wonder if the trauma inflicted upon those sweet innocent children was to come afterwards when their elders would have corralled them into their meeting spaces and infected them with the victim mentality that pervades their entire existence these days. Perhaps THAT is, in reality, the multi-generational trauma of which they speak.
It was no surprise at all to me, when the RCMP (Royal Canadian Mounted Police) showed up after about 25 minutes, as I could see that several people were glancing furtively back and forth, over at me and then down on their phones, punching numbers. It was not hard to guess that they were calling the police. I fully expected them to arrive at any minute, and I had no intention of running away. When the police did finally arrive on the scene, I greeted them cordially. They asked what my purpose was and why I was there, and I pointed at my sign, the messages, affirming to them that I was on public property, and asked them if what I was doing was illegal. Basically they had to show up because they were called. Fine. One of them went over to the group of Indians there, and the other stood near me and said nothing at that point. He simply had to keep watch, while the other officer went over to the complainants and talked with them. I could hear one of the Natives telling the officer in dramatic fashion that there were children here and that I was a threat to them.
When the two officers were back together again in my presence, we had a nice little chat. I was forthright with my messages on the sign. They simply told me that they did not want any problems, and they were there because they had received the calls from these Natives. Of course I was not causing any problems. I was on the sidewalk. Nobody has to pay attention to me on the sidewalk if they don’t want to.
We carried on the discussion. I even told them openly that many people advise that one should never talk to the cops in a situation like this, but I told them that I do talk to them because I consider them to be actual people too. I mentioned that surely they are noticing that there is a war against our people (and this included them as they were both Caucasian men). I mentioned to them about the Hate Crimes unit visiting me just over two years ago, (article here) because of an anonymous complaint about contents on the Truth and Justice for Germans Society website. I told them that I do a lot of interviews and shows and broadcasts online, and work very hard at getting the truth out there. I gave them my business card which contains my websites and social media and my weekly radio show on the Republic Broadcasting Network.
At some point during our discussion I assured them that I was not planning on staying here all night, and it was going to be dark soon anyway. They were visibly relieved! I think that they had been quite concerned with how they would handle the situation about my unwanted presence there, while clearly I was not breaking any laws. Now they would not have to grapple with that dilemma any more. We moved a few steps over and I put the sign in my car.
Then I told them an important part of my background, and that is about my upbringing in a family who loved the natives. I explained why my parents immigrated to Canada, to go live among the Eskimos in the far north, which they did in the 1950’s. Later, our home in Edmonton where I grew up was full of Inuit art which my father had purchased from soapstone carvers and print makers. We often had visitors from the north staying with us in Edmonton, and we loved the natives! That is an important part of my background, I told them, because they needed to know that I come from a place of love, not hate. However, I despise the lie. I hate the lie.
Lastly, I told them that soon we could go to jail for the words on my sign. With broad smiles they assured me that I was NOT going to jail that night. With an equally broad smile I said I was happy about that, however, this is becoming seriously problematic, referring to the laws which are being drafted.
Indeed, the MP from Winnipeg Centre has re-introduced her “Residential School Denial” law into the House of Commons. Dear reader, you can view her announcement here.
*************************************
On a completely unrelated topic, I must make a brief comment about the ostrich “cull” which culminated the same day as my little action above, and so it is timely.
Ostriches on the Universal Ostrich Farm near Edgewood BC were killed the evening of November 6th into the morning of November 7th, 2025. This was an 11-month battle, after some of the ostriches died from illness in December 2024. The remainder of the flock recovered and was healthy ever since. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) deemed it necessary to kill (they say “cull”) the flock to “stop the spread” as they say.
I say that is about as logical as murdering all the remaining villagers in a town where some of their people died last winter, in order that these healthy people don’t spread whatever it was that made some of their friends die a year ago.
Free Speech Monika
~ Exercising My Human Right to Speak Freely!
Please Share
No Reconciliation Without Truth
8 November 2025
by Monika Schaefer
Truth and Reconciliation is an expression well known not just in relation to South Africa, but in Canada as well, over the last couple of decades. On the 7th of November, 2025, I did a one-woman protest action in front of the community centre in my little hometown in north-eastern British Columbia, where there was a large gathering of Aboriginal folks from other areas of this province. There are many names for the Aboriginal peoples of Canada. They generally have been called Indians, or they are referred to as Native, Indigenous, or First Nations (which they are NOT, but that is a whole other topic). Before relating to you my little event, some background to Truth and Reconciliation in Canada is necessary.
The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC) was established in 2008, and the final report of the seven-year process of gathering testimonies all across the country from thousands of people associated with the Indian Residential School (IRS) system was published in 2015. Many recommendations were made as a result of the TRC.
This 75-minute video has valuable reference material with regards to UNDRIP (United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples) and the graves story.
On May 27, 2021, the Kamloops Indian band announced to the world that they had discovered 215 unmarked graves at the site of the former Indian Residential School in Kamloops. Headlines quickly turned to “mass graves” and flags were lowered to half mast, remaining there for the longest period in Canadian history during peace-time. The anti-White hatred went into super-charge, and White guilt took on whole new dimensions. We are no longer just “colonizers” or “settlers” who “stole the land”, but now we are being called “uninvited guests” in the country that our ancestors built. Court cases are currently causing all kinds of uncertainty about the status of people’s private property, some public areas such as provincial parks are being declared off-limits to non-native people during certain periods of time, and streets and plazas are being renamed to names which nobody can pronounce. Over 100 churches were burnt or vandalized during the year following that announcement, but that was “understandable” according to then Prime Minister of Canada Justin Trudeau.
The only trouble with the Kamloops unmarked graves story is that none of these so-called graves have been investigated. The original claim was made after ground-penetrating radar found anomalies. Nothing has been excavated, in spite of 12 million dollars having been given to the Kamloops band specifically to investigate the graves. Why have they not done any digging? I have heard them say that the spirits should not be disturbed, and that they would rather carry out ceremonies to guide the children’s spirits home. However, could it be that they, the Natives, simply do not want to dig, because they fear they will not find any skeletons? Could those anomalies detected by the ground penetrating radar be old tree roots from the orchard? or old septic field lines? How can we know, if nobody digs?
I have been talking quite a lot about these issues over the past few years, as it concerns me greatly that we in Canada are being accused of having committed genocide, and laws have even been introduced which, if passed, will land you in jail for questioning these graves or for questioning their atrocity stories about the schools or for saying anything positive about the schools. This sounds very much like the Holocaust denial laws! Even the language is similar – “Residential School Denial” – that is what they are in the process of criminalizing.
In these “the Flipside with Monika” broadcasts on RBN the Republic Broadcasting Network, here, here, here, and here, this was the main topic. Also, these interviews with Jim Rizoli, here and here.
****************************************
The above background gives context to my little action. I made a two-sided sign, and strolled along the public side-walk in front of the community centre with my sign. The action lasted about 45 minutes. The photo here was taken on the edge of town, before going on location.
Just four words. No Reconciliation without Truth. Does that sound offensive to you, dear reader? Are there any problems there? Is it logical? Can we have reconciliation without truth?
Likely you think, why on earth is she asking these silly questions. The answers are self-evident are they not? Well, evidently, some people do get very offended, and I witnessed it first hand.
The other side of the sign also had just four words: Unmarked Graves?? Evidence Please!!
Here is a quick summary of some of my encounters today. I wish I had had a videographer along to document the whole event, but here it is from memory.
The first Native man who saw me (I’ll call him Man#1) approached with a big smile on his face and thumbs up. I expressed my delight that he liked my sign. I had the “no reconciliation without truth” side facing him. He liked it a lot. I then showed him the other side with “unmarked graves?? evidence please!!” and he really liked that too. He was beaming ear-to-ear. Again I expressed my joy that he was with me on these simple but important messages. He asked if he could give me a hug, and of course I accepted his big bear-hug. This was such a heart-warming start to my little action.
Over to my left I could see that people were peering curiously at us from the other side of the glass windows of the entrance lobby. People were milling about, walking in and out of the doors, as well as going to and fro, between the Legion across the street where some of their activities were taking place, and the community centre. Children were playing off to one side near the big wall tent that the organizers had set up next to the building. The children saw me and they waved and smiled. I waved and smiled back. It was all very pleasant. Alas, that was about to change.
From the entrance lobby, a Native man (I’ll call him Man#2) came marching over to me, and looked my sign up and down (the “Truth” side) and demanded in a hostile tone, “what are you doing here?! what is this?! why are you here?!” I simply responded by pointing at the message and saying that it was important to have truth in order to have reconciliation. I do not remember his precise words back, but something to the effect of “What! Your truth!? What are you talking about?!” He was clearly VERY offended by those four words, “no reconciliation without truth”.
I calmly turned the sign to show him the other side, and asked if there was evidence to support the unmarked graves story. I told him that I was interested in seeing evidence. His hostility grew. I was regaled with
“We have our memories! We have our stories – these things happened! We have Elders and – are you accusing them all of being liars?!?!”
This he practically screamed in my face. At some point during his ranting and raving, I couldn’t help but to chuckle a little, and that really got him hopping mad!
“And you are laughing at us!”
When things were calmer again, I asked why do they not use the money that the government gave to them, earmarked for the investigation, and do an excavation and find the evidence. He was extremely hostile in response to that suggestion. He repeatedly talked about their memories and their stories, and demanded an answer from me regarding his accusation that we are calling the Elders and the “survivors” all liars if we do not believe them. This discussion was clearly going nowhere.
Man#1 was still standing there next to Man#2, and he was looking bewildered and uncomfortable. I told Man#2 that this man (motioning towards Man#1) had really liked my sign and had given me a hug, and had no hostility towards me at all. Then Man#1 stammered that he hadn’t really understood my meaning, but he couldn’t explain what he meant by that. He was now siding with Man#2, but was clearly confused. He was not overtly hostile at all, just had a very troubled look on his face. At this point I must say I felt sorry for him.
Man#2 took his cell phone out to take a picture of me in an intimidating manner as though he expected that I should want to run and hide from his desire to document my presence. I think I took a bit of the wind out of his sail when I stood proud, and smiled beside my sign, posing for the photo. and said,
“I’m proud of my sign.”
After he snapped the photo, I turned the sign to show the other side and posed again with an even bigger smile.
What I witnessed happening there between Man#1 and Man#2 was a small but extremely important example of how “group think” works, and how peer pressure will affect people’s perceptions, memories, feelings, the very way that they think and behave. The video linked above – and here again – is called ‘UNDRIP and the Graves. Reference Material‘. In it, there is a description of the TRC sign which was prominently displayed at the entrance of the hearing rooms as the IRS testimonials were gathered across Canada. That sign would set the stage for the participants, suggesting that these schools were terrible places, where terrible things happened. There is little doubt that this would have had a dampening effect on anyone who might possibly have wanted to tell about their positive experiences, and it would certainly have helped them “remember”, even if by hearsay, that these were terrible places. That specific topic discussion beginning at approximately minute 9 in the video lasts for about six minutes. (Incidentally, immediately following that section, comes an interesting fact about Robert Carney, the father of the current Prime Minister. This video was made before Mark Carney became PM.) The entire video is well worth the hour and a quarter to watch, but if you are strapped for time, you might like to check out those bits, especially in relation to the peer pressure which I just described above.
Back to my little action. Other Natives started coming over to take a closer look. Many short conversations took place. Some just told me that I was not welcome there and that I was trespassing and should go away. I responded that I was on public property and had no intention of interfering with their event or activities. Some talked with me, but none were friendly like Man#1. I pointed out to the growing throng that they were being instrumentalized by the government who was actually at war against the Caucasian Race, and that they were being used as instruments of that war. The government was trying to divide us all and get us all to hate one another, I told them. I explained that they would not likely be better off with the replacement population who were being brought into the country.
One native fellow accompanied a woman who passed closely by me and loudly sputtered that he was there to protect her from my verbal abuse. I smiled at them.
An elderly native woman approached me with her walker and with glowering eyes told me that she attended the Kamloops school! She paused in such a way as though awaiting my shocked gasp, like as if she had just told me she got struck by a fire-breathing dragon. When the expected gasp of horror did not come, she continued,
“there was abuse there!”
I asked her why the Indian band had lobbied the government to keep the school open when it was to be closed. I also asked her why so many former students attended the school reunion several years after the school closed. Would they really have wanted to attend a joyful reunion if it was such a traumatic – and genocidal – place?
Several Natives accosted me with statements like “there are chiiiillllldren here!” drawing out that word in such a dire tone, that a blind passerby might have thought I was engaging in a violent freak show or perhaps pornography! [Oh, but wait, a pornographic display might have been okay with them, given what is being fed to our children (presumably their children too) right in the public schools – but I digress.]
A White woman walked by and practically spit her words at me “you are a HATER!”
A White man was the most upset of all, and he just yelled at me.
“We stole their land! And my wife was a 60’s scoop baby! We stole their land! And then we stole their babies! And we’re still stealing their babies!”
I told him (or tried to speak in between his outbursts, at least for the benefit of other people nearby who might have been listening) that I personally know a “60’s scoop” woman who is very grateful that she was adopted and raised by a White family, because she was aware that she had a much better upbringing than she could ever have had with her biological family, who were completely dysfunctional. She was doing very well in life, because of her loving adoptive family, who happened to raise her with a deep appreciation and knowledge of her people and their traditions and culture. Does that sound like it was genocide? Why would White families adopt these children that are in precarious situations, where perhaps the parents are either absent or drunk or abusive? Could it be because our people care?
Another sidebar: I personally know of several White families who have adopted native children who came out of terrible circumstances, and in each and every case the adopting family did it out of love and care. These children were not stolen! And in many cases these loving White families are rewarded for their care with life-long difficulties associated with their FAS-affected (Fetal Alcohol Syndrome) adopted children. That is of course blamed on the “evil White man” as well. They will blame the parents’ alcoholism on their school experiences, and that they are “survivors”.
When does the blaming stop, and when should a people assume responsibility? Do the German people assume victimhood status and whine to the world about being bombed and burned during that long war also known as WW1 and WW2? No! Instead, the Germans are industrious and are still paying reparations to a certain group of people who are ALWAYS the victim while perpetrating war and destruction and genocide on others, and if we notice, then we are called anti-semitic. But I digress again.
I will never say that there was never an abuse. Of course not, because one cannot say that about any institution or any group or any school! But systemic abuse? Genocide? Murder? Secret burials by night? These are serious allegations, and it behooves us to demand evidence, and it behooves the accusers to provide that evidence. Thus far, there has been obfuscation and non-stop wailing about the evil White man and multi-generational trauma.
About those children who were allegedly being traumatized by my mere presence, I must say, the cheerful and carefree smiles and waves were a most interesting display of trauma. They did not even run away when I smiled and waved back. I cannot help but wonder if the trauma inflicted upon those sweet innocent children was to come afterwards when their elders would have corralled them into their meeting spaces and infected them with the victim mentality that pervades their entire existence these days. Perhaps THAT is, in reality, the multi-generational trauma of which they speak.
It was no surprise at all to me, when the RCMP (Royal Canadian Mounted Police) showed up after about 25 minutes, as I could see that several people were glancing furtively back and forth, over at me and then down on their phones, punching numbers. It was not hard to guess that they were calling the police. I fully expected them to arrive at any minute, and I had no intention of running away. When the police did finally arrive on the scene, I greeted them cordially. They asked what my purpose was and why I was there, and I pointed at my sign, the messages, affirming to them that I was on public property, and asked them if what I was doing was illegal. Basically they had to show up because they were called. Fine. One of them went over to the group of Indians there, and the other stood near me and said nothing at that point. He simply had to keep watch, while the other officer went over to the complainants and talked with them. I could hear one of the Natives telling the officer in dramatic fashion that there were children here and that I was a threat to them.
When the two officers were back together again in my presence, we had a nice little chat. I was forthright with my messages on the sign. They simply told me that they did not want any problems, and they were there because they had received the calls from these Natives. Of course I was not causing any problems. I was on the sidewalk. Nobody has to pay attention to me on the sidewalk if they don’t want to.
We carried on the discussion. I even told them openly that many people advise that one should never talk to the cops in a situation like this, but I told them that I do talk to them because I consider them to be actual people too. I mentioned that surely they are noticing that there is a war against our people (and this included them as they were both Caucasian men). I mentioned to them about the Hate Crimes unit visiting me just over two years ago, (article here) because of an anonymous complaint about contents on the Truth and Justice for Germans Society website. I told them that I do a lot of interviews and shows and broadcasts online, and work very hard at getting the truth out there. I gave them my business card which contains my websites and social media and my weekly radio show on the Republic Broadcasting Network.
At some point during our discussion I assured them that I was not planning on staying here all night, and it was going to be dark soon anyway. They were visibly relieved! I think that they had been quite concerned with how they would handle the situation about my unwanted presence there, while clearly I was not breaking any laws. Now they would not have to grapple with that dilemma any more. We moved a few steps over and I put the sign in my car.
Then I told them an important part of my background, and that is about my upbringing in a family who loved the natives. I explained why my parents immigrated to Canada, to go live among the Eskimos in the far north, which they did in the 1950’s. Later, our home in Edmonton where I grew up was full of Inuit art which my father had purchased from soapstone carvers and print makers. We often had visitors from the north staying with us in Edmonton, and we loved the natives! That is an important part of my background, I told them, because they needed to know that I come from a place of love, not hate. However, I despise the lie. I hate the lie.
Lastly, I told them that soon we could go to jail for the words on my sign. With broad smiles they assured me that I was NOT going to jail that night. With an equally broad smile I said I was happy about that, however, this is becoming seriously problematic, referring to the laws which are being drafted.
Indeed, the MP from Winnipeg Centre has re-introduced her “Residential School Denial” law into the House of Commons. Dear reader, you can view her announcement here.
*************************************
On a completely unrelated topic, I must make a brief comment about the ostrich “cull” which culminated the same day as my little action above, and so it is timely.
Ostriches on the Universal Ostrich Farm near Edgewood BC were killed the evening of November 6th into the morning of November 7th, 2025. This was an 11-month battle, after some of the ostriches died from illness in December 2024. The remainder of the flock recovered and was healthy ever since. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) deemed it necessary to kill (they say “cull”) the flock to “stop the spread” as they say.
I say that is about as logical as murdering all the remaining villagers in a town where some of their people died last winter, in order that these healthy people don’t spread whatever it was that made some of their friends die a year ago.
Telling CBC HQ to get fucked to their faces at their workplace while they stared fearfully, scurrying around in the windows was a high point of my year.
Immense thanks and respect to the club, their supporters and families.
I’ve carried this weight around for a long time and it was very satisfying and righteous to be able to physically point to those who are truly responsible for so much death of our people.
You wanted our “comments”, CBC. Soon the entire country will have them.
