Starting the Conversation About the Replacement of Canada’s European Founding/Settler People
Immigration reformers blitzed Brampton, Ontario on Saturday with a pamphlet highlighting the swift ethnic cleaning/replacement of the European founding/settler people of Canada. People European descent are now 33% of Brampton.
POLL RESULTS
| Yes. We need to uphold the values on which Canada is based. 59% (2637 votes) |
 |
| No. Canada has always welcomed people from different backgrounds. 27% (1216 votes) |
|
| This should not be a focus of discussion with so many other problems. 14% (615 votes) |
|
TOTAL VOTES: 4468
The Multicult Agenda of the Canadian Banks
BMO. CIBC. SCOTIABANK. TD. ROYAL BANK. The Canadian “Big Five” banks, all making billions, and ALL pushing a MULTICULT AGENDA upon the citizens of Canada.
Of the five, the most insideous is BMO. Did you know? Their relationship with China goes back 197 years:
“BMO Bank of Montreal has been building relationships in China, almost as long as the bank has been in business. Merely three months after its opening in 1817, the bank undertook its first foreign exchange transaction in support of trade with China in 1818.“
BMO bank machine 2015, North Shore, Vancouver BC. Chinese-Canadian Population, 5%:
Did you also know that BMO’s insta-tellers across the country feature not our official languages of English and French, but rather English and Chinese. Yes, in Calgary. In Edmonton. In Ottawa. In Halifax, a city which is less than 3% Chinese-Canadian.
WHY? I have put this question to DOZENS of BMO employees– tellers, branch managers, all the way to their Director of Marketing and top executives in Toronto. Guess what?
NO ONE WILL ANSWER AS TO WHY BMO bank machines feature the Chinese language from COAST TO COAST.
Customer Service? Not likely! There are few Chinese-speaking Canadians in many of these locations. Rather, perhaps it is more of a calculated agenda to inundate our country with China’s culture and language. Strange.
Perhaps they know something we don’t…
Lucky for some, but for the majority of Canadians, not so much
Brad Salzberg
STEPHANIE LEVITZ
OTTAWA — The Canadian Press
Published Tuesday, Mar. 10 2015, 5:23 AM EDT
A note which appears to have been prepared for Costas Menegakis, the parliamentary secretary for immigration, says the party’s base will learn as a result that the government spends close to $1-billion a year on those efforts.
The note says the other risk of undertaking such a study is that the government’s relationship with Quebec may surface as an issue.
And while the study only began last month and the committee has only just started hearing from witnesses, the briefing note also lays out five recommendations for the eventual report.
A copy of the note was obtained by The Canadian Press.
Menegakis’ office declined to comment specifically on the note’s contents.
“Committee members are masters of their own proceedings,” said an e-mailed statement. “As always, we look forward to hearing testimony from all witnesses.”
Liberal MP John McCallum, who sits on the committee, called it “chilling” to see the reference to the party’s base in the document.
“It’s as if they are concerned their own supporters would be aghast at the idea of spending money to help settle immigrants,” McCallum said in an interview.
“It’s good not only for the immigrants, it’s good for the country if the newcomers settle quickly and work and not be receiving welfare and become productive Canadians.”
The Conservatives credit much of their electoral success in recent years to the inroads the party has made among new Canadians. They’ve also massively overhauled the immigration system which they’ve said is partially motivated by concerns raised from within the newcomer community.
Part of the overhaul has been shifting the focus to so-called economic class immigrants, those coming to Canada for work purposes.
The briefing note suggests, among other things, that employers ought to be more engaged in the settlement process.
But it’s clear what those witnesses say doesn’t matter, said Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, the NDP’s immigration critic and also a member of the committee.
“They already have their lines, and whatever the witnesses are bringing to the table, they already want to go forward with certain things,” she said.
“That’s not my view about what should be the work of a committee.”
The committee is scheduled to meet Tuesday morning.
The Mayors have stated that they have no “PLAN B”, implying that there is no alternative. But it is very clear that there is one : The Mayors should unite to call for a dramatic cut to unnecessary immigration. It has been responsible for over 83% of Metro’s huge population increase since 1991 when Canada’s mass immigration policy began. It will soon be responsible for close to 100% of the 1 million population increase. Metro Vancouver’s population in 1991 was 1.6 million. It is now over 2.5 million. If the immigration madness continues, it will be 3.5 million in 2040.
Residents should vote “NO” for the following reasons :
There is no point to having 3.5 million people living here by 2040. Canada’s average yearly intake of 250,000 immigrants per year is corrupt and abnormal. It is a policy, not a constitutional requirement. It could be changed easily. Our federal government has never provided any justification for this intake. If there is no justification for the high intake, then there is no justification for huge unnecessary infrastructure expenditures that result from the intake. If Metro prevents the congestion, then Metro won’t need a “Congestion Improvement Tax”. If there were ever a time for Metro politicians to show some backbone, this is it.
Instead, the Mayors are trying to deceive the public by not saying why the area needs all the extra infrastructure. Two sample ballots that Metro Vancouver has published demonstrate the deceit. The first one began with this statement : “One million more people will live and work in Metro Vancouver by 2040. The region’s mayors worked together to develop a plan to reduce congestion on roads and bridges and to provide more transit to communities across the region.” To be blunt, this means that the Mayors didn’t have the guts to stand up to Ottawa and now they want residents to pay for their gutlessness.
The second sample ballot, the one that residents will use, says nothing about an additional 1 million people living in Metro Vancouver. The obvious question is “WHY?” The clear answer is that the Mayors and Councillors do not want Metro to ask who these 1 million people are and why they are coming here. The answer to “Who are these people” is unnecessary immigrants. The answer to “Why are they coming here?” is that all of our federal parties are equally gutless and scared that if they stand up for the majority of Canadians, they will lose their share of the immigrant vote.
None of the conventional reasons given for immigration such as the supposed necessity to deal with an aging population or the supposed need to stimulate the area’s economy are true. The federal government’s own research has shown that Canada should not use immigration to solve problems caused by an aging population. It has also shown that immigration provides no significant stimulus to the economy. In fact, recent research of thousands of income tax returns demonstrates that immigrants are taking close to $30 Billion per year more in benefits out of the economy that they are contributing in taxes.
Municipalities like to plead that they don’t have power over matters such as immigration. Yet, they often grovel to Ottawa for other things and manage to get concessions by doing so. The point is that now is an even more important time to get concessions and to avoid a senseless 1 million increase in Metro Vancouver’s population and the accompanying massive expenditures.
Municipalities should also stop pretending that their Green strategies will solve problems created by a massive population increase here. The truth is that Ottawa’s senseless high immigration policy will negate all the gains that might be achieved by Green strategies. For example, Vancouver boasts that it will become the Greenest City in the world. Meanwhile, it is clear-cutting huge areas of single-family detached houses in order to make room for high rise condos. The new people need resources such as water, heat and food. These demands will create huge new environmental pressures—as well as huge amounts of waste. In 2014, Metro shipped about 170,000 tonnes of garbage to places like Washington State. Annually, it generates about 900,000 tonnes of garbage, including single-family waste. What will these Green hypocrites say in 2040 when a new federal government wants to increase Metro Vancouver’s population by another 1 million?
The current municipal cast in Metro Vancouver does not seem capable of understanding that there are limits to an area’s ability to absorb people.
Metro Vancouver, Southern Ontario and many other urban areas in Canada reached that limit years ago. Canada desperately needs governments to develop some backbone and to stabilize our population.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
http://www.bcstats.gov.bc.ca/
http://www.vancouversun.com/
|
TheReligionofPeace.com Muslim Opinion Polls A “Tiny Minority of Extremists”? “Strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be Have you heard that Islam is a peaceful religion because most Muslims live peacefully and that only a “tiny minority of extremists” practice violence? … Neither does it explain why religious violence is largely endemic to Islam, despite the tremendous persecution of religious minorities in Muslim countries. In truth, even a tiny minority of “1%” of Muslims worldwide translates to 15 million believers – which is hardly an insignificant number. However, the “minority” of Muslims who approve of terrorists, their goals, or their means of achieving them is much greater than this. In fact, it isn’t even a true minority in some cases, depending on how goals and targets are defined. The following polls convey what Muslims say are their attitudes toward terrorism, al-Qaeda, Osama bin Laden, the 9/11 attacks, violence in defense of Islam, Sharia, honor killings, and matters concerning assimilation in Western society. The results are all the more astonishing because most of the polls were conducted by organizations with an obvious interest in “discovering” agreeable statistics that downplay any cause for concern. (These have been compiled over the years, so not all links remain active. We will continue adding to this).
Terrorism ICM Poll: 20% of British Muslims sympathize with 7/7 bombers NOP Research: 1 in 4 British Muslims say 7/7 bombings were justified People-Press: 31% of Turks support suicide attacks against Westerners in Iraq. YNet: One third of Palestinians (32%) supported the slaughter of a Jewish family, including the children: World Public Opinion: 61% of Egyptians approve of attacks on Americans Pew Research (2010): 55% of Jordanians have a positive view of Hezbollah Pew Research (2010): 60% of Jordanians have a positive view of Hamas (34% negative). Pew Research (2010): 15% of Indonesians believe suicide bombings are often or sometimes justified. 16% of young Muslims in Belgium state terrorism is “acceptable”. Populus Poll (2006): 12% of young Muslims in Britain (and 12% overall) believe that suicide attacks against civilians in Britain can be justified. 1 in 4 support suicide attacks against British troops. Pew Research (2007): 26% of younger Muslims in America believe suicide bombings are justified. Pew Research (2011): 8% of Muslims in America believe suicide bombings are often or sometimes justified (81% never). Pew Research (2007): Muslim-Americans who identify more strongly with their religion are three times more likely to feel that suicide bombings are justified ICM: 5% of Muslims in Britain tell pollsters they would not report a planned Islamic terror attack to authorities. Federation of Student Islamic Societies: About 1 in 5 Muslim students in Britain (18%) would not report a fellow Muslim planning a terror attack. ICM Poll: 25% of British Muslims disagree that a Muslim has an obligation to report terrorists to police. Populus Poll (2006): 16% of British Muslims believe suicide attacks against Israelis are justified. Pew Research (2013): At least 1 in 4 Muslims do not reject violence against civilians (study did not distinguish between those who believe it is partially justified and never justified). Pew Research (2013): 15% of Muslims in Turkey support suicide bombings (also 11% in Kosovo, 26% in Malaysia and 26% in Bangladesh). PCPO (2014): 89% of Palestinians support Hamas and other terrorists firing rockets at Israeli civilians. Pew Research (2013): Only 57% of Muslims worldwide disapprove of al-Qaeda. Only 51% disapprove of the Taliban. 13% support both groups and 1 in 4 refuse to say. See also: http://wikiislam.net/
al-Qaeda, Osama bin Laden and Islamic State (ISIS) Pew Research (2007): 5% of American Muslims have a favorable view of al-Qaeda (27% can’t make up their minds). Only 58% reject al-Qaeda outright. Pew Research (2011): 5% of American Muslims have a favorable view of al-Qaeda (14% can’t make up their minds). Pew Research (2011): 1 in 10 native-born Muslim-Americans have a favorable view of al-Qaeda. al-Jazeera (2006): 49.9% of Muslims polled support Osama bin Laden Pew Research: 59% of Indonesians support Osama bin Laden in 2003 Pew Global: 51% of Palestinians support Osama bin Laden MacDonald Laurier Institute: 35% of Canadian Muslims would not repudiate al-Qaeda World Public Opinion: Muslim majorities agree with the al-Qaeda goal of Islamic law. ICM Poll: 13% of Muslim in Britain support al-Qaeda attacks on America. World Public Opinion: Attitude toward Osama bin Laden: Pew Research (2010): 49% of Nigerian Muslims have favorable view of al-Qaeda (34% unfavorable) Pew Research (2011): 22% of Indonesians have a favorable view of al-Qaeda (21% unfavorable) Gallup: 51% of Pakistanis grieve Osama bin Laden (only 11% happy over death) Zogby International 2011: “Majorities in all six countries said they viewed the United States less favorably following the killing of the Al-Qaeda head [Osama bin Laden] in Pakistan” Populus Survey: 18% of British Muslims would be proud or indifferent if a family member joined al-Qaeda. Policy Exchange (2006): 7% Muslims in Britain admire al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups. Informal poll of Saudis in August 2014 shows 92% agree that Islamic State (ISIS) “conforms to the values of Islam and Islamic law.” Hurriyet Daily News / Metropoll (2015): 20% of Turks support the slaughter of Charlie Hebdo staffers and cartoonists.
9/11 Attacks al-Arabiya: 36% of Arabs polled said the 9/11 attacks were morally justified; 38% disagreed; 26% Unsure Gallup: 38.6% of Muslims believe 9/11 attacks were justified (7% “fully”, 6.5% “mostly”, 23.1% “partially”) Pew Research (2011): Large majorities of Muslims believe in 9/11 conspiracy
Violence in Defense of Islam 40% of Indonesians approve of violence in defense of Islam. Pew Global: 68% of Palestinian Muslims say suicide attacks against civilians in defense of Islam are justified. Center for Social Cohesion: One Third of British Muslim students support killing for Islam Policy Exchange: One third of British Muslims believe anyone who leaves Islam should be killed NOP Research: 78% of British Muslims support punishing the publishers of Muhammad cartoons; NOP Research: Hardcore Islamists comprise 9% of Britain’s Muslim population; Pew Research (2010): 84% of Egyptian Muslims support the death penalty for leaving Islam ICM Poll: 11% of British Muslims find violence for religious or political ends acceptable. Terrorism Research Institute Study: 51% of mosques in the U.S. have texts on site rated as severely advocating violence; 30% have texts rated as moderately advocating violence; and 19% have no violent texts at all. Pew Research (2013): 76% of South Asian Muslims and 56% of Egyptians advocate killing anyone who leaves the Islamic religion. Pew Research (2013): 19% of Muslim Americans believe suicide bombings in defense of Islam are at least partially justified (global average is 28% in countries surveyed). Pew Research (2013): 39% of Muslims in Malaysia say suicide bombings “justified” in defense of Islam (only 58% say ‘never’). Die Presse (2013): 1 in 5 Muslims in Austria believe that anyone wanting to leave Islam should be killed. Motivaction Survey (2014): 80% of young Dutch Muslims see nothing wrong with Holy War against non-believers. Most verbalized support for pro-Islamic State fighters. BBC (2015): Following the Charlie Hebdo attacks, 27% of British Muslims openly support violence against cartoonists. Another 8% would not say, meaning that only 2 of 3 surveyed would say that the killings were not justified.
Sharia (Islamic Law) 83% of Pakistanis support stoning adulterers Center for Social Cohesion: 40% of British Muslim students want Sharia ICM Poll: 40% of British Muslims want Sharia in the UK GfK NOP: 28% of British Muslims want Britain to be an Islamic state NOP Research: 68% of British Muslims support the arrest and prosecution of anyone who insults Islam; MacDonald Laurier Institute: 62% of Muslims want Sharia in Canada (15% say make it mandatory) World Public Opinion: 81% of Egyptians want strict Sharia imposed in every Islamic country World Public Opinion: 64% of Egyptians said it was “very important for the government” to “apply traditional punishments for crimes such as stoning adulterers.” Pew Research (2010): 77% of Egyptian Muslims favor floggings and amputation Pew Research (2010): 82% of Egyptian Muslims favor stoning adulterers Pew Research (2013): 72% of Indonesians want Sharia to be law of the land Pew Research (2013): 81% of South Asian Muslims and 57% of Egyptians suport amputating limbs for theft. Pew Research (2013): According to an interpretation of this study, approximately 45% of Sharia supporters surveyed disagreed with the idea that Islamic law should apply only to Muslims. Economist (Pew 2013): 74% who favor Islamic law in Egypt say it should apply to non-Muslims as well. WZB Berlin Social Science Center: 65% of Muslims in Europe say Sharia is more important than the law of the country they live in. FPO (2014): 43% of Islamic teachers in Austria openly advocate Sharia law over democracy.
Honor Killings Turkish Ministry of Education: 1 in 4 Turks Support Honor Killings Civitas: 1 in 3 Muslims in the UK strongly agree that a wife should be forced to obey her husband’s bidding BBC Poll: 1 in 10 British Muslims support killing a family member over “dishonor”. Middle East Quarterly: 91 percent of honor killings are committed by Muslims worldwide. 95% of honor killings in the West are perpetrated by Muslim fathers and brothers or their proxies. A survey of Muslim women in Paris suburbs found that three-quarters of them wear their masks out of fear – including fear of violence. 1 in 5 young British Muslims agree that ‘honor’ violence is acceptable. Pew Research (2013): Large majorities of Muslims favor Sharia. Among those who do, stoning women for adultery is favored by 89% in Pakistanis, 85% in Afghanistan, 81% in Egypt, 67% in Jordan, ~50% in ‘moderate’ Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand, 58% in Iraq, 44% in Tunisia, 29% in Turkey, and 26% in Russia. Pew Research (2013): Honor killing the woman for sex outside of marriage is favored over honor killing the man in almost every Islamic country. Over half of Muslims surveyed believed that honor killings over sex were at least partially justified. (2013) Jordanian teens support honor killing.
Assimilation Muslims have highest claimed disability rates in the UK (24% of men, 21% of women) 2011: 16% of UK prisoners in 2010 are Muslim (Muslims comprise about 3% of the total population) Pakistani Muslims in the UK are three times more likely to be unemployed than Hindus. Indian Muslims are twice as likely to be unemployed as Indian Hindus. Policy Exchange: 1 in 4 Muslims in the UK have never heard of the Holocaust; Policy Exchange: 51% of British Muslims believe a woman cannot marry a non-Muslim Policy Exchange: Up to 52% of British Muslims believe a Muslim man is entitled to up to four wives Policy Exchange: 61% of British Muslims want homosexuality punished NOP Research: 62% of British Muslims do not believe in the protection of free speech; ICM Poll: 58% of British Muslims believe insulting Islam should result in criminal prosecution Pew Global (2006): Only 7% of British Muslims think of themselves as British first (81% say ‘Muslim’ rather than ‘Briton’) Policy Exchange (2006): 31% Muslims in Britain identify more with Muslims in other countries than with non-Muslim Brits. Die Welt (2012): 46% of Muslims in Germany hope there will eventually be more Muslims than Christians in Germany. Ipsos MORI: Muslims are 3 times as likely as Christians to believe that their religion is the only way. Pew Research (2011): Muslim-Americans four times more likely to say that women should not work outside the home. Pew Research (2007): 26% of Muslim-Americans want to be distinct (43% support assimilation) Pew Research (2011): 20% of Muslim-Americans want to be distinct (56% support assimilation) Pew Research (2011): 49% of Muslim-Americans say they are “Muslim first” (26% American first) Pew Research (2011): 21% of Muslim-Americans say there is a fair to great amount of support for Islamic extremism in their community. ICM Poll: 11% of British Muslims find violence for political ends acceptable Wenzel Strategies (2012): 58% of Muslim-Americans believe criticism of Islam or Muhammad is not protected free speech under the First Amendment. Pew Research (2013): “At least half’ of Muslims surveyed believed polygamy is morally acceptable. Die Presse (2013): 1 in 3 Muslims in Austria say it is not possible to be a European and a Muslim. 22% oppose democracy WZB Berlin Social Science Center: 45% of Muslims in Europe say Jews cannot be trusted.
|
