Indian High Commissioner suggests Canada should increase its Indian population by 60 million
India’s High Commissioner to Canada stated because of Canada and India’s “complimentary economies,” Canada should be keen to welcome 60 million more Indians into the country.
Dinesh K. PatnaikPhoto Credit: Leah Mushet, WS; ChatGPT
CALGARY — India’s High Commissioner to Canada stated because of Canada and India’s “complimentary economies,” Canada should be keen to welcome 60 million more Indians into the country.
In an interview with CBC News on Saturday, Commissioner Dinesh K. Patnaik, echoed sentiments of a mutually beneficial economic strategy, which he believes includes a large increase of Indian immigrants.
“You have things which we need, and we have things which you need,” stated Patnaik.
“For example, you have the second largest [geographical] country in the world — with a 40 million population, you need at least over 100 million population.”
Patnaik is referring to India’s high population — as India yields the highest population in the world with an estimated 1.4 billion people in 2026, which it would be willing to lend to Canada.
“You need people to man many of your resources,” stated Patnaik.
“We have the capacity, we have the intellect, we have the talent, we have the resources.”
According to Statistics Canada, the country’s population is approximately 41 million in 2026.
In 2021, 44%, or 1.1 million, of Canada’s population was Indian, the largest group of South Asians in the country.
India’s Ministry of External Affairs reports, as of 2025, Canada has 2.8 million Indians in the country.
What Patnaik was insinuating was that since Canada needs 100 million individuals in order to truly actualize its economic potential — Indians would help to do so.
Statistics Canada has already predicted by 2041, Canada’s South Asian population (which includes more than just Indians), will reach 4.7 to 6.5 million people.
But Patnaik is suggesting something different — he is advocating 60 million of India’s citizens leave the country.
This advice would go against what the feds have claimed their current immigration plans are.
Last fall, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) announced a return of immigration levels in the country to “sustainable levels.”
The IRCC states they expect to issue 408,000 study permits in the next year; of this number, 155,000 will be for new international students.
They also state this is a 7% decrease from 2025 numbers.
This is related to a lowering of Canada’s Indian immigration since, a report on public college international student demographics from Statistics Canada states in the 2023 to 2024 academic year, 59% of students were coming from India.
The IRCC also stated they are reducing their permanent resident (PR) targets and their temporary resident (TR) targets between 2025 and 2027.
It reported in 2025, there were 146,395 fewer new workers compared to the same period in 2024.
Canada’s Auditor General says the mismanagement and changing priorities of immigration officials has caused an inventory backlog and resultant extension of waiting times.
“Most of the delays were really being caused by inefficient management practices around applications and managing the inventory,” said Karen Hogan at the release of her audit of Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship Canada.
“There’s a backlog of inventory that, at times, is greater than the immigration level for a given year.
“The department has the ability to improve how they process applications, but also to be more transparent with the applications about what their wait time might actually be.”
With Canada’s record immigration levels targets for the upcoming years, at 465,000 this year, 485,000 in 2024, and 500,000 in 2025, the Auditor General’s findings hint at a systemic incapacity to handle the additional workload.
The audit was conducted to establish IRCC’s efficiency – or lack thereof – in processing permanent residence applications.
Eight permanent residence programs were focused on under the economic, family, and refugee and humanitarian classes.
All of those programs remained backlogged at the end of the previous year.
“On average, privately sponsored refugees waited 30 months for a decision while overseas spouses or common-law partners waited 15 months to be reunited with their partners in Canada,” Hogan says. “While processing times improved in most of the programs we examined, they continued to exceed the department’s service standards for most applications in 2022.”
Moreover, the Auditor General reported that some applications waited in the queue for longer periods of time after they were initially submitted by applicants. This was most common with refugee applications, which waited an average of 15 to 20 months before receiving an initial assessment.
Video
Differences in size and age of application backlogs by country of citizenship existed in seven of the eight permanent resident programs examined by the Auditor General.
While improvements have been made, the report said that the length of time some applications spent in the system is increasing, especially for refugee and spousal sponsorship applications from overseas.
In response to the audit, IRCC Minister Marc Miller said that his department has continued reducing backlogs by digitizing applications, hiring and training new staff, and relying on automation to increase processing capacity and efficiency.
“Immigration is critical to Canada’s long-term success, and we recognize the importance of ensuring that our systems operate efficiently,” he said.
“I am optimistic, considering the progress made by IRCC despite all the challenges it faced over the past few years.”
The report said that by the end of 2022, 99,000 refugees were still waiting their applications to be processed.
The processing time for refugee applications is 3 years on average, and many applicants spend years waiting on a decision.
Privately sponsored refugees waited 30 months on average for a decision, while overseas spouses or common-law partners waited an average 15 months to be reunited with their partners in Canada, compared to the 12-month service standards.
PNP Processing Time Increases
In the family class, upwards of 21,000 applications were finalized within six months of being received – ahead of at least 25,000 older applications that were in the backlog at the end of 2022.
In the Provincial Nominee Program (PNP), the backlog time increased from 12 to 20 months from January to December of 2022.
The age of applications for in-Canada spousal sponsorships increased from 27 to 47 months.
The report further demonstrated that backlogs vary by country in seven out of eight audited programs, especially for government-assisted refugees, federal skilled workers, and sponsored spouses who applied from out of country.
In the government-assisted refugees program, for example, more than half of the applications submitted by Somalian citizens and the Congolese citizens were backlogged.
In comparison, only one-third of Syrian applications were in backlog.
While these three countries have the most applications for government-assisted refugee sponsorships, their visa offices are also the most under-resourced.
“The department continued to assign application workloads to offices without assessing whether they had enough resources to process them,” said the audit.
The report’s overall point – Canada is taking more applications than it can handle under the current immigration targets the government has set.
Another contributing factor is the failure of the Immigration Minister to exercise his authority to “apply intake controls” during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Auditor General’s Recommendations:
To provide applicants with clear expectations about timelines for a decision, IRCC should establish “achievable and reliable” service standards for PR application processing. This includes refugee applications. Additionally, online information on expected processing times should be provided for all permanent resident applications and consider the volume and age of applications in its inventories.
IRCC should take steps to identify and address the differential wait times to support timely processing in all PR programs, as it works within the annual admission targets set by the Immigration Levels Plan. Moreover, it should develop and implement a plan to collect race-based and ethnocultural information from applicants directly to address any racial disparities in wait times.
IRCC should examine backlogged applications to identify and action processing delays within its control, including waiting for officer actions or follow-up. Older backlogged applications should also be prioritized while working to achieve the annual admission targets set by the Immigration Levels Plan.
To improve consistency of application processing times across its offices, IRCC should match assigned workloads with available resources, and it should support these decisions with reliable information on the available capacity within its offices. Immediate action needs to be taken by it to address application backlogs that have accumulated in certain offices with limited capacity.
To support timely processing for all applicants, IRCC should examine differential outcomes in processing times related to the implementation of automated decision-making tools and reduce these disparities to the extent possible, including by reallocating sufficient resources to the applications directed to the manual processing.
IRCC should implement – without further delay – online application portals for its refugee programs, while also working to complete its Digital Platform Modernization Initiative.
