Tue, September 23, 2025 at 2:00 p.m. EDT6 min read
US President Donald Trump speaks during the 80th session of the UN’s General Assembly at the United Nations headquarters in New York on Sept. 23. Photographer: Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images
(Bloomberg) — President Donald Trump assailed the United Nations and other countries in a grievance-laden speech that saw him accuse the world body of offering nothing but “empty words,” label climate change a “con job” and warn that open borders are destroying them.
His closing message swept aside some of the UN’s most cherished files: climate change, which Trump repeatedly called a hoax, and uncontrolled migration, which he declared the top political issue of the era.
“Countries that cherish freedom are fading fast because of their policies on these two subjects. You need strong borders and traditional energy sources if you are going to be great again,” Trump said Tuesday, after warning bluntly: “Your countries are going to hell.”
US President Donald Trump speaks during the 80th session of the UN’s General Assembly at the United Nations headquarters in New York on Sept. 23.Photographer: David Dee Delgado/Bloomberg
He faulted the UK and Germany over green-energy policies, and Greece and Switzerland for allowing in immigrants. He blasted Brazil for what he said was censorship and repression.Trump reserved his sharpest attacks for other countries’ immigration policies and for UN support for asylum seekers. Trump accused the UN of “funding an assault on western countries and their borders,” citing efforts to provide aid to migrants.
WATCH: President Trump says illegal immigration is ruining countries.Source: Bloomberg
“The UN is supposed to stop invasions, not create them, and not finance them,” he said. And he cited longstanding complaints from Democrats and Republicans alike, who have often lamented — though rarely in such blunt terms — that the UN has become little more than a talking shop.
I never miss a chance to claim victimhood while inflicting violence.
In 1947, the United Nations handed me more than half of someone else’s land, a gift I didn’t earn, from colonial powers who didn’t own it. I accepted.
My neighbors objected. I called it war, and in the chaos, I began my cleansing. Over 700,000 Palestinians were driven from their homes—some fled, yes, but many were forced out at gunpoint, their villages razed, their names erased.
Then I planted pine trees over the ruins to hide the memory. Forests where homes once stood. Parks over cemeteries. I made it green so the world wouldn’t see the black underneath. I called it “reforestation.” They called it erasure.
I am Israel. I have never chosen peace only dominance.
In 1967, I launched a pre-emptive war and seized Gaza, the West Bank, East Jerusalem, the Golan Heights, and Sinai. I claimed it was for security.
I held onto it for power. I built settlements, one by one, choking Palestinian towns. International law said it was illegal, I ignored it. My map grew. Their freedom shrank.
I am Israel. I could have ended the occupation. Many times. But I ALWAYS said NO!
In 2000, at Camp David, I offered a patchwork of disconnected enclaves surrounded by walls, checkpoints, and soldiers. I called it peace. Palestinians walked away. I called them extremists. Then I built a wall, not on my border, but deep in theirs.
I called it security. They called it theft.
I am Israel. I glorify militarism. I raise children to believe they are chosen.
My textbooks erase Palestine. My soldiers patrol streets with rifles pointed at teenagers. My media justifies bombings. My politicians joke about flattening Gaza. I send airstrikes to refugee camps, schools, and hospitals. Then I say they were human shields.
I am Israel. I elected Netanyahu. Again and again.
Not once, by mistake, but knowingly, I voted for leaders who vowed to crush the Palestinians, to expand settlements, to NEVER allow a Palestinian state.
My ministers speak of “the Arabs” as a demographic threat. My settlers burn olive trees. My mobs chant “Death to Arabs.” I call it patriotism.
I am Israel. I speak of democracy but deny it to millions under my control.
I rule over millions who cannot vote in the country that controls their lives. I build roads they cannot drive on. I issue permits for them to breathe, to move, to live. I bomb Gaza, then seal it off and say it’s their fault. I say I left Gaza, but I control its air, sea, and borders.
I say they are free…. then I starve them.
I am Israel. I demand recognition but give none in return.
I demand that Palestinians accept me as a Jewish state, while refusing to even say the word “Nakba.”
I ignore the homes, lands, and history of those I displaced. I hold their keys in museums, not their hands. I deny the refugees their right to return.
I make laws that call them “absentees,” even when they’re just over the hill.
I am Israel. I cry antisemitism, when what I fear is truth and accountability.
I call any critic a hater. I blur the line between Judaism and Zionism, using one to shield the crimes of the other.
I weaponize history to excuse apartheid. I manipulate trauma to justify conquest. I say “Never again” but let it happen to others, by my own hand.
I am Israel. I will never be secure.
The whole world agrees that Israel is not a state, but rather an organized terrorist organization supported by the American government.
New UN Declaration: Migrants Have Rights & Canadians Have Obligations
Do your future a favour. Contact your MP and 1. alert him or her to a sinister conference to take place in drug sodden Marakesh, Morocco, and 2. demand that he vote against the Marakesh accord. Stoned or not, world leaders are being asked to endorse a lunatic declaration affirming the “rights” of migrants and OUR obligation to admit, feed, and shelter them and, almost equally insane, our obligation to suppress criticism of the invasion. Don’t be mollified by being told that it’s merely a declaration, not a binding treaty. Over the years, Canadian governments have disloyally signed on to a number of UN conventions that have been used to strip Canadian of their rights. For instance, the interventionist New Brunswick Court of Queen’s Bench cited Canada’s endorsement of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination as justification for tearing up the will of the late Robert McCorkill who had willed his estate to the National Alliance, a U.S. White nationalist, allegedly “racist” group.
The Toronto Sun’sCandice Malcolm comments: “The Trudeau government is cheerleading a controversial United Nationsinitiative that has the potential to fundamentally change Canada.
It’s called the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration, and UN representatives are meeting in Morocco in December to discuss and adopt this global agreement. It may sound like just another gathering of out-of-touch elites patting themselves on the back, and the compact’s text insists the agreement is non-binding. But the ideas proposed are not your run-of-the-mill aspirational pledges. This UN compact is unprecedented and truly radical. It seeks to make immigration a universal human right.
‘Refugees and migrants are entitled to the same universal human rights and fundamental freedoms, which must be respected, protected and fulfilled at all times,’ reads the document’s preamble.
The agreement doesn’t simply apply to bona-fide refugees — those fleeing war and persecution whose government has failed to protect them. It applies to all migrants. It seeks to change international law and norms on migration, and blur the distinction between refugees and migrants — the latter merely seeking more economic opportunity but failing to do so according to a country’s established immigration rules. The compact stops just short of saying that every person from around the world has a right to live in Canada and become a Canadian citizen.
And it gets even worse. Alongside describing a world with no borders and no meaningful citizenship, the document includes a particularly disturbing section about the media. One of the ‘guiding principles’ is a ‘whole-of-society approach’ to promoting mass migration, including the role of the media. It calls upon governments to ‘promote independent, objective and quality reporting… and stopping allocation of public funding or material support to media outlets that systematically promote intolerance, xenophobia, racism and other forms of discrimination towards migrants.’
So much for a free press. The UN wants governments to actively intervene in the media and pick and choose which journalists are worthy of promoting, based on a radical ideology and far-left worldview. Is this what the Liberal government’s new $595-million media slush fund seeks to do? The prime minister and his top officials are known for name-calling and attacking anyone who disagrees with their dogma on immigration, diversity and multiculturalism. Liberal officials frequently accuse opponents of being intolerant, xenophobic and racist for raising legitimate concerns about illegal immigration, border security and terrorism.
Are these accusations going to be tied to funding decisions for the media? Will recipients of Trudeau’s media fund be prohibited from criticizing open borders and mass migration? Will funding be tied to an attestation to promote UN propaganda? The Trudeau government has played a leading role in advancing this UN scheme; two Trudeau cabinet minister’s admitted so much in a September article in Maclean’s Magazine. ‘The UN’s global compact on refugees could be a game-changer — and Canada is well-placed to make it a reality,’ they argue.
This dystopian UN plan seeks to erase borders, destroy the concept of citizenship, undermine the rule of law and circumvent state sovereignty. It would change what it means to be Canadian and prevent the media from criticizing these fundamental changes.
Several of our allies, including Australia, the U.S. and Israel have already pulled out of this disastrous UN compact. Across the world, political leaders and respected journalists are ringing the alarm bell.
In Canada, however, the Trudeau government is welcoming this UN scheme, while most Canadian journalists are failing to inform Canadians about the radical changes on our doorstep. (Toronto Sun, December 1, 2018)
