Tag Archives: mass immigration

Municipal Leaders Must Take A Stand on the Catastrophic Effects of Mass Immigration — Paul Fromm

Posted on by

What Happened to the Canada We Built?

From immigrants who arrived with nothing and built a future, to seniors who cannot afford to retire and young Canadians who cannot afford to leave home, I keep asking myself:There are days when I come home from speaking with Canadians and I genuinely want to cry.Not because of something I’ve seen on television or read in the newspaper.Because of the people I’ve met.The elderly woman who worked for 40 years and now has to choose between heating her home and putting food on the table.The homeless woman I met near Burlington Mall who once owned a condominium and now struggles to find somewhere that will accept her and her service dog.The parents whose adult children have moved back home because they cannot afford rent, let alone a house of their own.And the tradesman who tells me that after years of developing his skills, he’s watching Canadian workers struggle to find employment.

These are not abstract political arguments to me.These are people I’ve met, people who have written to me, people who have trusted me enough to share their stories.And I keep coming back to one question.What happened to the Canada we built?The Canada People Once Came Here to BuildI want to take you back to the 2021 federal election.I was canvassing, knocking on doors, and meeting people from every imaginable background.Earlier that day, a Canadian man in his thirties had called me a racist. I asked him why he believed that. He couldn’t give me a specific reason, but he was adamant.Later, I approached a home where a gentleman had turned his Conservative lawn sign around to display a PPC sign.

As I walked up, his landlord, a gentleman originally from India, was there.He asked to see my pamphlet.After the confrontation earlier that day, I wasn’t sure what to expect.But instead of an argument, he told me his life story.He was born in India and had immigrated to the United Kingdom in search of a better life. But the opportunities he had hoped to find simply weren’t there.So he decided to try his luck in Canada.He left the United Kingdom and arrived in Canada with just £500 in his pocket, a Canadian sponsor, and a dream of becoming a landlord.He started out living in a basement, determined to build something for himself.He and his partner worked seven days a week. Eventually, they purchased their first home, a fixer-upper. They poured their own labour and skills into restoring it and sold it.Then they did it again.Over the years, they acquired several properties.He had become what he dreamed of becoming.A landlord.But what struck me wasn’t simply his success.It was how angry he was about what he saw happening to Canada’s immigration and social-support systems, even back in 2021.He believed that people were taking advantage of programs that taxpayers worked hard to support. He was particularly upset by examples he’d seen of people teaching others how to exploit benefits and food banks.Whether every example he had encountered was representative is another question. But his frustration was unmistakable.He knew what it meant to start with almost nothing.He knew what it meant to sacrifice.And he believed that opportunity, responsibility, and hard work were values worth protecting

.I left that conversation thinking about the contrast with the accusation I’d received earlier that day.Here was an immigrant who had built a successful life and was deeply concerned about the same policy questions I was raising.It reminded me why we should listen to people rather than assume we know what they think based on their background.Another Immigrant. Another Dream.I remember another story, this time about a master electrician who came to Canada with his three children.Like the landlord, he arrived with a sponsor and started out in a basement apartment.His family lived in the basement of an Oakville townhouse while he established himself.Within a year, they had purchased a rural home in Acton, Ontario.Imagine that.Three children. A new country. A new beginning.He came with skills, a willingness to work, and a determination to provide for his family.And within a year, he had taken a major step toward the life he wanted.I think about stories like these when I hear people argue that concerns about immigration policy must come from hostility toward immigrants.That simply doesn’t reflect the conversations

I’ve had.I’ve met immigrants who love Canada, believe deeply in personal responsibility, and worry about the future of the country just as much as anyone born here.The question isn’t where someone was born.It’s what kind of country we’re building together, what opportunities it offers, and what responsibilities we share.She Worked for 40 Years. Now She Must Choose Between Heat and Food.One of the most heartbreaking experiences I’ve had while canvassing was meeting an elderly woman who had worked for approximately 40 years.She was still healthy and managing on her own.But she was struggling to afford her home.She was facing the kind of decision no elderly Canadian should have to make.Do I heat my home, or do I buy groceries?When I spoke publicly about her situation, I said I wanted to cry.I meant it.And her circumstances were getting worse. I feared she might eventually have to leave her home.Think about what that means.A person spends decades contributing to society, working, paying taxes, and building a life.And in the years when she should finally be enjoying some peace and security, she’s worried about whether she can afford to stay in her own home.What are the fruits of a lifetime of labour supposed to be?Surely they should include the dignity of growing old without fearing the next heating bill.

A Message From a 66-Year-Old Canadian Woman. After I shared that story, another woman reached out to me privately.She’s 66 years old and still working. She expects to continue for several more years, if she’s fortunate enough to remain employed.She told me she felt deeply let down by the system she had contributed to throughout her life.She questioned the fairness of government priorities, including the support available to newcomers compared with the circumstances of some struggling seniors.Her concerns about the direction of the country went beyond money.She felt that the culture she grew up with was changing and that the values she cherished were being lost.Then she wrote four words that stayed with me.“My heart is broken.”She asked me to protect her identity because she feared that speaking openly might affect her employment.She loves her job. She wants to keep working. But she doesn’t feel comfortable expressing her political concerns publicly.I find that deeply troubling.In her next message, she acknowledged that many other Canadians were experiencing far greater hardship than she was.Even while worrying about her own future, she was thinking about others.

That’s the kind of person whose story deserves to be heard.Judy Marie: From Homeowner to HomelessnessIn January 2026, I spoke with Judy Marie, a woman experiencing homelessness in Canada.Judy told me she had once owned a condominium in Burlington.Now she was struggling to find somewhere to live.She described difficulties with her credit rating, the challenge of finding housing that would accept her service dog, and the long wait for subsidized housing.She had spent time in a shelter and described an experience that left her feeling unsupported.What struck me most was the disbelief in her voice.She couldn’t believe she’d ended up in this situation.Judy also spoke about an Afghan family she had encountered whom she believed had received substantial housing assistance.She was upset by what she perceived as a disparity between the assistance available to that family and her own struggle to find a home.I cannot independently confirm the details of that family’s circumstances or the source of its housing support.But Judy’s underlying question deserves an answer.How does someone who once owned a home in this country end up struggling to find somewhere to live, and what are we doing to help?

A compassionate country should be able to support people fleeing hardship while also providing meaningful help to its own vulnerable residents.Those responsibilities should not have to compete.I don’t want to see Judy forgotten.And I don’t want her story reduced to another statistic about homelessness.She’s a person.She had a home. She had a life. She still has hopes for her future.We should care about what happens to her.The Young Canadians Who Cannot Get StartedDuring my canvassing, I met many parents whose adult children were living at home.Some had moved back because rent had become unaffordable.Others had never managed to leave.These weren’t necessarily young people refusing to work or take responsibility.They were trying to make a start in a housing market that seemed increasingly beyond their reach.I think back to the immigrant landlord who arrived with £500 and eventually built a property business.I think about the electrician who came with three children and bought a home within a year.Those stories represent the kind of opportunity that attracted people to Canada.Now I meet Canadian parents who wonder whether their own children will ever be able to afford a home.I’m not suggesting that homeownership was easy for everyone in the past, or that every newcomer today faces the same opportunities and obstacles.But I do believe we’ve lost something important when so many people can no longer imagine achieving the milestones their parents took for granted.The ability to establish a home, raise a family, and build some security is about more than economics.It’s part of the foundation of a stable society.The Workers Who Feel ReplacedTed Irwin, a drywall tradesman in British Columbia, contacted me with his concerns about the construction industry.He believes Canadian workers are losing opportunities to companies employing lower-paid foreign labour.He described experienced tradespeople struggling to find work and employers he believes are exploiting the labour system.His message ended:“Canada is broken.”I haven’t independently verified his estimates about the proportion of foreign workers in his trade, and we should be careful not to confuse legitimate foreign-worker employment with violations of labour rules.But Ted raises questions worth investigating.Are Canadian tradespeople receiving fair opportunities?Are employers complying with wage requirements?Are our labour and immigration policies serving workers, employers, and the long-term interests of the country?These questions shouldn’t be dismissed simply because they’re politically uncomfortable.And the people raising them shouldn’t be ignored.We Are Losing More Than Purchasing PowerThe more stories I hear, the more I believe this conversation is about something deeper than the cost of living.It’s about culture.Not merely the food we eat, the languages we speak, or the traditions we celebrate.I’m talking about the values that help a society flourish.Responsibility. Family. Community. Hard work. Compassion. Honesty. Freedom of conscience. Respect for our neighbours.The belief that effort should lead to opportunity.The belief that contributing to your country should mean something.The belief that when someone falls on hard times, we help them regain their footing rather than abandon them.I worry that we’ve begun to confuse spending money with solving problems.We can announce another program, another initiative, another funding commitment.But what does it mean if the elderly woman still cannot afford to heat her home?If Judy still cannot find housing?If Ted still cannot find work?If young adults still cannot afford to leave home?These are the outcomes that matter to me.How We Treat the Vulnerable Says Everything About UsI’ve often believed that you can judge a nation by how it treats its most vulnerable people.And I have serious concerns about how we’re approaching some of the most difficult issues facing Canadians.When I see people suffering from addiction or serious mental illness, I want us to ask whether they are receiving meaningful treatment, recovery support, and a realistic opportunity to rebuild their lives.When I see the expansion of medical assistance in dying, I believe we must ask whether people facing severe illness or disability have genuine access to the care, support, and dignity they deserve.When I think about women facing difficult pregnancies, I want to see stronger practical support for mothers and families, including those who may wish to pursue adoption.These are deeply sensitive issues. Canadians have different convictions about the appropriate role of government and individual choice.But surely we can agree that vulnerable people deserve more than slogans, paperwork, and announcements.They deserve care that actually reaches them.They deserve dignity.And they deserve hope.Who Is Government Supposed to Serve?I keep hearing that Canada is a wealthy country.I keep seeing governments announce enormous spending commitments.And yet I keep meeting people who feel they have been left behind.The senior who cannot retire.The homeowner who cannot afford heat.The homeless woman who cannot find housing.The tradesman worried about his livelihood.The young adult who cannot afford a place to live.The parents wondering what kind of future awaits their children.I believe government has a fundamental responsibility to the people it serves.That responsibility includes making difficult decisions about spending, immigration, housing, health care, and public safety.It also includes being accountable for the results.We can welcome newcomers and value their contributions while still having serious conversations about immigration levels, integration, housing capacity, and the responsibilities of citizenship.We can care about people suffering from addiction while also insisting that families deserve safe parks and neighbourhoods.We can recognize the needs of vulnerable people without forgetting the seniors and working families who are struggling.These things should not be mutually exclusive.But when government priorities seem increasingly disconnected from the daily experiences of ordinary Canadians, people understandably begin asking whom those priorities are serving.And government owes them an answer.What Happened to the Promise?I think again about that immigrant landlord.A man who came to Canada with £500 and a dream, after leaving India and discovering that the United Kingdom wasn’t offering the opportunities he had hoped to find.He worked seven days a week, invested his labour, took risks, and built a future.I think about the master electrician who brought his three children to Canada and purchased a home within a year.I think about the elderly woman who worked for 40 years and now worries about heating her home.And I think about the young Canadians whose parents tell me they cannot afford to move out.Those stories span generations and backgrounds.

But together, they raise a question that I believe we can no longer afford to ignore.Are we preserving the kind of country where hard work, responsibility, and sacrifice can still lead to a better life?I don’t expect government to guarantee that every Canadian will be successful.Life doesn’t work that way.But I do expect our institutions to protect the conditions that make success possible.And I expect us to remember the people who helped build the prosperity, communities, and institutions we inherited.We owe something to those who came before us.And we owe something to those who will come after us.I Haven’t Forgotten Their FacesOne of the things canvassing has taught me is that every door has a story behind it.Some people are angry.Some are frightened.Some are exhausted.And some simply want someone to listen.I haven’t forgotten the elderly woman.I haven’t forgotten Judy.I haven’t forgotten the parents worrying about their children.And I haven’t forgotten the immigrant who arrived with almost nothing and built the life he dreamed of.Their experiences are different, but they all have something to teach us about the country we are becoming.I want Canada to be a place where our seniors can live with dignity, where working people have a fair opportunity, where newcomers can contribute and build a future, and where our children can look forward to lives at least as promising as our own.That’s the Canada

I believe is worth working for.And that’s why I intend to keep listening, asking questions, and sharing the stories of people who too often feel unheard.Through Pulse of the People, I hope to bring more of those voices into the conversation.Not because every person will agree with me.But because their experiences matter.We inherited a country built through generations of work, sacrifice, and hope. Our responsibility is not simply to enjoy what they built, but to preserve and improve it for those who come next.And right now, too many Canadians are wondering whether we’re living up to that responsibility.— Michael Bator

Pierre Didn’t Need to Say Yes to Mass Immigration. He Just Needed a Riding Map

Posted on by

Pierre Didn’t Need to Say Yes to Mass Immigration. He Just Needed a Riding Map.

The Conservative leader’s defenders say the CPC never endorsed high inflows. The record is more awkward: Amritsar flights, foreign-nurse licensing tours, a 2022 “pro-immigration” radio pitch

Michael Bator

Aug 28, 2026


The Conservative leader’s defenders say the CPC never endorsed high inflows. The record is more awkward: Amritsar flights, foreign-nurse licensing tours, a 2022 “pro-immigration” radio pitch — then a hard turn once the polls turned. Harmony’s (CPC trolling me for years) defence of Pierre Poilievre is simple. The Conservative Party of Canada does not say yes to mass immigration. Maxime Bernier is unelectable. Michael Bator is spreading misinformation. Vote Pierre. That last instruction may still be how a lot of Canadians vote. It is not an answer to the charge. Bernier’s point was never that Poilievre published a manifesto titled Yes to Mass Immigration. It was that the Conservative leader changes with the wind: one script for Punjabi radio and festival season, another for the housing-and-wages audience once public opinion soured.

You can test that without mind-reading. You only need the clips, the petitions, and the dates. The Amritsar campaign was not a slip. It was the product. In April 2023, Poilievre stood in Brampton in a room holding banners that read “Direct Flights to Amritsar Now” and “Open the Skies to Amritsar.” This was not a stray remark on the way out the door. It was a launch. “Punjabi Canadians have been calling on the federal government to deliver direct flights between Amritsar and Canada,” he said. “But even after years of activism from the Punjabi community, the Liberal government has failed to fight gatekeepers and open the skies to Amritsar.”
Hindustan Times, April 2023Then the line that tells you who the policy was for: “I, along with my deputy leader Tim Uppal, shadow minister Jasraj Singh Hallan and a group of other conservatives, are launching a full campaign to get the direct flight from Canada to Punjab, especially Amritsar, so that over a million Canadians who have their origins in that part of the world can fly directly from our country to that beautiful place.”

Same Hindustan Times report He repeated the pitch to Indo-Canadian media the same week: Canada has the largest Punjabi diaspora in the world; London and Milan already have the route; seniors and families should not have to land in Delhi and drive. He said he had met the Indian High Commissioner, written the transport minister, and sat down with Air Canada and Air India.

Indo-Canadian Voice A week later he was at the Surrey Vaisakhi parade, thanking volunteers who “helped rally support… for a direct flight to Amritsar” and pointing people to the party petition.

Poilievre on X, April 23, 2023 That petition lived at conservative.ca/amritsar.This did not age out after one news cycle. In April 2025, on RED FM, he was still selling Toronto and Vancouver to Amritsar and blaming Liberals for failing to land a single direct flight after a decade. Singapore, Malaysia, the UAE, the UK, Italy — they had the route. Canada did not.

YouTube: “Pierre Poilievre Talks Donald Trump, Liberals, Income Tax Cuts and Direct Flights to Amritsar,” RED FM CANADA

A flight is not an immigration quota. Pretending otherwise is sloppy. Pretending this was just “cutting red tape for travellers” is sloppier. You do not build a named campaign, parade presence, petition URL, and years of Punjabi-media hits around a route to one city in one Indian state unless you are courting one electorate in Brampton, Surrey, Calgary, and the suburban ridings Conservatives cannot win without.

If the defence is “Canada First,” the question writes itself. Why that city, that community, that banner, that petition? “Bring home the nurses” was the other half of the circuit. The second exhibit is the Blue Seal. In March 2023 the party put it on paper. Foreign-trained doctors and nurses already in Canada were being blocked by “gatekeepers.” The numbers cited: 34,105 foreign-trained nurses and 18,900 foreign-trained doctors not working in their profession. Only 37 percent of foreign-credentialed nurses were working as nurses. The fix was a national competency test, an answer in 60 days, and a certificate that would travel across provinces that signed on. Poilievre’s own language went further than “process the paperwork.”“I will put an end to this bureaucratic madness and bring home our doctors and nurses to help fix our broken healthcare system. My plan will ensure foreign-trained healthcare workers can easily work in Canada.”

Conservative Party: “Remove Gatekeepers to Bring Home Doctors & Nurses”And: “The Blue Seal will mean that it won’t matter where someone comes from, it matters what they can do.”

Same page Then he took it on the community circuit.Winnipeg, Filipino community, June 2023: “There are 20,000 immigrant doctors & 32,000 immigrant nurses blocked from serving patients… so immigrant professionals can get tested and get to work within 60 days.”

Poilievre on X, June 2, 2023January 2024 video: “Maria is one of Canada’s 32,000 foreign-trained nurses blocked from working here. Let them take a test, prove they’re qualified & get to work.”

Poilievre on X, January 27, 2024Taste of Manila, August 2024: “Everyone is excited about removing gatekeepers to allow Filipino nurses to write a Blue Seal exam and get licensed to treat patients & reduce wait times.”

Poilievre on X, August 19, 2024Tamil community event, April 2024: Blue Seal for doctors, engineers, and nurses.

Poilievre on X, April 29, 2024Be precise, because the other side will be. Blue Seal is mainly about licensing people already here, not a new federal nurse-import quota.

That distinction matters. What also matters is the sales channel. The same leader who later talks about overwhelmed hospitals sold faster entry of foreign-trained clinicians to the exact diasporas whose votes the party has spent a decade chasing. “Cut the red tape” is popular in a waiting room and popular in a banquet hall. That is the point.The cleanest receipt is the flipIf Amritsar is the ethnic-vote file, the immigration-volume file is the weather vane.

November 2022. Exclusive interview with Harjit Singh Gill on Shere Punjab Radio. The title of the upload is not subtle: “Conservative party is pro-immigration.”Poilievre said it out loud. He also used a working example: a Punjabi restaurant that had been open four years and still could not serve customers because Ottawa would not process the cook. Bring in the cooks, he said, and the business could hire Canadian waitresses, receptionists, janitorial staff. Process economic immigration quickly. Speed foreign-credential recognition. Welcome everyone who wants to work hard.“The conservative party is pro-immigration and we want to be the party that welcomes everyone who wants to work hard and achieve their dreams.”

YouTube: Sherepunjab Radio, November 8, 2022CBC captured the same period. Poilievre told Punjabi radio the party was pro-immigration. At an ethnic-media roundtable he talked about expanding Express Entry, making it easier for temporary foreign workers to become permanent residents, and improving parent sponsorship.

CBC: “Pierre Poilievre thinks he can win over new Canadians,” December 2022That was the offer when the coalition still needed to be built and the housing revolt had not yet swallowed the issue.Watch the product change once the country did.January 2024: tie the number of people invited to the number of homes built.

CIC News summary of the Winnipeg press conferenceAugust 29, 2024: “We have to have a smaller population growth.” Curb the Temporary Foreign Worker Program and the international student pipeline. Do not grow the population at three times the housing stock.

CBC: “Poilievre says he would cut population growth,” August 29, 2024By 2025 the line was “too many, too fast.” End the fraud in the student and TFW programs. Get back to something closer to the old system. Later still: scrap new TFW visas except agriculture, cap population growth below housing, jobs, and health-care capacity, Harper-era permanent levels, a “mathematical formula.”
CIC News, January 2025
VisaVerge, September 2025
La Converse, 2026 election guide

He can hold both thoughts in one speech now — welcome the ones who contribute, license the doctors and nurses, and cap the numbers — because that is what a professional opposition does after the median voter moves.

Global News transcript of his convention speechThat is allowed in politics. It is not evidence of a man who does the unpopular thing because it is right. It is evidence of a man who found the popular thing twice: first among the communities he needed to peel off the Liberals, then among the voters who decided the last decade of inflows had broken housing, wages, and hospitals.

Same leader. Different room. Different script. What the defence actually requires you to believe. To keep Harmony’s version intact, you have to believe several things at once. You have to believe a multi-year Amritsar campaign, complete with parade troops and a party URL, is just aviation policy. You have to believe years of Filipino, Tamil, and Punjabi photo-ops around foreign-trained nurses are just health-care reform that happened to be filmed in banquet halls. You have to believe “the Conservative party is pro-immigration,” plus faster cooks from abroad, plus TFW-to-PR, was a temporary misunderstanding.

You have to believe the later “too many, too fast” turn was always the plan, merely waiting for the correct week to be announced.Or you can believe the ordinary thing: Pierre Poilievre is very good at finding the vote. In 2022 the vote he needed lived in ethnic media and suburban temples and festivals. By 2024 the vote he needed lived in the comments under every rental listing in Toronto and Vancouver. He served both.That is not a secret Liberal talking point. It is how you win a Canadian election if you are a Conservative who watched 2015 and decided the party would never again be caricatured as hostile to new Canadians — until hostility to the volume became the majority position, at which point the volume became the scandal.Bernier’s insult was that this is poll-chasing.

The generous version is coalition management. The operational version is the same: do not pick a fight that costs a seat you can keep with a banner.The question that survives the talking pointsNone of this proves Poilievre wants “open borders.” He does not run on that, and he has spent the last two years running against it. None of it proves every foreign-trained nurse should stay unlicensed while emergency rooms buckle. Canadians can want faster credentialling and lower inflows. Those are not opposites.

The question is narrower, and it is the one Harmony ducked.If the Conservative Party does not say yes to mass immigration, why did its leader spend the building years saying yes to the politics that produced it — faster foreign labour, faster family and community traffic to Punjab, faster professional entry sold community by community — and only discover the brake once the country was already screaming about rent?

A leader who does what is right whether or not it is popular would have told the 2022 radio audience the thing he tells rallies now: the pipeline was too wide, the colleges were a racket, the TFW program was eating entry-level jobs, and a direct flight is not a substitute for an integration policy.

He did not. He told that room what that room wanted. He told the next room what the next room wanted. That is not backbone. That is a weather vane with a petition link.

If you want the CPC line, Harmony already wrote it. If you want the file, it is all still online. Start with the Brampton banners, the Vaisakhi post, the Shere Punjab interview, and the party page that promised to bring the nurses home. Then read the 2024–26 speeches and ask what changed besides the polls.


Source listAmritsar flights

Nurses, credentials, “cut red tape”

The 2022 “pro-immigration” record

The later turn

Did Diversity Make Canada Happier?

Posted on by

Posted on by
It’s Immigration, Stupid: JD Vance BLASTS Canada’s mass immigration agenda

JD Vance BLASTS Canada’s mass immigration agenda

U.S. Vice President JD Vance says Canada’s declining living standards stem from its own immigration policies and leadership choices — not from President Trump or American politics.

WATCH THE FULL EPISODE BELOW

Share

U.S. Vice President JD Vance is warning Canadians not to blame Donald Trump or American politics for Canada’s declining living standards. Responding to new economic data, Vance says Canada’s stagnation is the result of its own leadership choices and decades of uncontrolled immigration, noting that Canada now has the highest foreign-born population share in the G7.

The taxpayer-funded legacy media will continue to carry water for the Liberals. Support strong, fearless, truly independent journalism. Become a Juno News premium subscriber today.

Subscribed

Meanwhile, the fight over a potential Alberta–Ottawa pipeline agreement is intensifying. B.C. Premier David Eby claims Alberta, Saskatchewan, and the Carney government are holding talks “behind his back,” warning that lifting the northern tanker ban would undercut coastal First Nations support and threaten B.C.’s project approvals.

Despite the political headwinds, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith says she is still optimistic, though more technical work is needed before her government can formally submit a proposal to Ottawa’s Major Projects Office.

Former Royal Canadian Air Force public affairs officer and journalist David Krayden weighs in on Vance’s comments, the political pressure building around Canada’s immigration and economic policies, and the growing controversy over Ottawa’s fighter-jet procurement — including concerns that splitting the fleet between U.S. F-35s and Sweden’s Gripen could fracture NORAD interoperability and provoke a major clash with Washington.

Trump Blasts UN Over Immigration, Climate in Combative Speech

Posted on by

Trump Blasts UN Over Immigration, Climate in Combative Speech

Catherine Lucey, Josh Wingrove and Jennifer A. Dlouhy

Tue, September 23, 2025 at 2:00 p.m. EDT6 min read

US President Donald Trump speaks during the 80th session of the UN’s General Assembly at the United Nations headquarters in New York on Sept. 23. Photographer: Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images
US President Donald Trump speaks during the 80th session of the UN’s General Assembly at the United Nations headquarters in New York on Sept. 23. Photographer: Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images

(Bloomberg) — President Donald Trump assailed the United Nations and other countries in a grievance-laden speech that saw him accuse the world body of offering nothing but “empty words,” label climate change a “con job” and warn that open borders are destroying them.

His closing message swept aside some of the UN’s most cherished files: climate change, which Trump repeatedly called a hoax, and uncontrolled migration, which he declared the top political issue of the era.

“Countries that cherish freedom are fading fast because of their policies on these two subjects. You need strong borders and traditional energy sources if you are going to be great again,” Trump said Tuesday, after warning bluntly: “Your countries are going to hell.”

US President Donald Trump speaks during the 80th session of the UN’s General Assembly at the United Nations headquarters in New York on Sept. 23.Photographer: David Dee Delgado/Bloomberg
US President Donald Trump speaks during the 80th session of the UN’s General Assembly at the United Nations headquarters in New York on Sept. 23.Photographer: David Dee Delgado/Bloomberg

He faulted the UK and Germany over green-energy policies, and Greece and Switzerland for allowing in immigrants. He blasted Brazil for what he said was censorship and repression.Trump reserved his sharpest attacks for other countries’ immigration policies and for UN support for asylum seekers. Trump accused the UN of “funding an assault on western countries and their borders,” citing efforts to provide aid to migrants.

WATCH: President Trump says illegal immigration is ruining countries.Source: Bloomberg
WATCH: President Trump says illegal immigration is ruining countries.Source: Bloomberg

“The UN is supposed to stop invasions, not create them, and not finance them,” he said. And he cited longstanding complaints from Democrats and Republicans alike, who have often lamented — though rarely in such blunt terms — that the UN has become little more than a talking shop.

Australian Senator Babet Urges People to Speak Up Against Globalist Elite’s Use of Mass Immigration to Dismantle Nation States

Posted on by

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more Thank you for becoming a valued subscriber. Your support fuels the fight for freedom, sovereignty, and common-sense conservatism, You’re helping us to deliver unfiltered truth, bold ideas, and the real news they don’t want you to hear.Stand Up, Speak Out, Show UpMass immigration, globalist control, and cultural erosion threaten our future. The time for silence is over, the defence of Australia begins in the streets. Senator Babet Aug 29  


  The Western world is under attack. Globalist elites are working tirelessly to dismantle nation states, erase borders, and dilute national identity through mass immigration. Australia is not immune.This weekend, rallies will be held in capital cities across the country opposing mass immigration. These rallies matter. They represent a stand for sovereignty, culture, and the right of Australians to determine their own future.Thanks for reading Let’s Talk About It! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Mass immigration is just one of the weapons being used against us. The globalists are also undermining our nation through currency manipulation, lowering our standard of living, trapping Australians in wage slavery, and breaking down the family unit. Piece by piece, they are eroding the foundations of our society.History shows us that strong men defend their families, their communities, and their nations. Yet today, masculinity itself is under attack. Men are told to sit down, be silent, and be ashamed of who they are. That must end.Voting once every three years is no longer enough. Politicians from both sides, left and right, have ignored the will of the people for far too long. The only solution now is for Australians to peacefully show up in force, to demonstrate their courage, and to give those timid masses at home the inspiration to rise and speak out as well.I call on men across Australia to stand up, to speak out, and to show up. Come out in force this weekend and defend our nation. The future of Australia depends on it.This should go without saying, but the legacy media and political establishment will attempt to discredit this movement. They will seize on any trouble, amplify it, and use it to smear all who attend as extremists, racists, or worse. Do not give them that opportunity. If you see anyone causing problems, shun them, remove them, and remain peaceful. Our strength is in our unity and discipline.Senator Ralph Babet.United Australia Party.Leave a comment

Senator Babet is an Australian Federal Senator, a committed advocate for freedom, and an unapologetic voice for common-sense conservatism. He is a passionate defender of Australian sovereignty, traditional values, and the right to speak the truth – no matter how unpopular it may be in the mainstream media or political establishment.Senator Babet created Let’s Talk About It as a platform to deliver unfiltered truth, bold ideas, and the real news they don’t want you to know – without censorship, spin, or corporate interference.“In an age of manufactured consent and media manipulation, telling the truth is an act of rebellion. Let’s Talk About It exists to inform, empower, and rally Australians who still believe in freedom, faith, and our way of life.”
— Senator Babet

Stand Up, Speak Out, Show UpMass immigration, globalist control, and cultural erosion threaten our future. The time for silence is over, the defence of Australia begins in the streets. Senator Babet Aug 29  


READ IN APP   The Western world is under attack. Globalist elites are working tirelessly to dismantle nation states, erase borders, and dilute national identity through mass immigration. Australia is not immune.This weekend, rallies will be held in capital cities across the country opposing mass immigration. These rallies matter. They represent a stand for sovereignty, culture, and the right of Australians to determine their own future.Thanks for reading Let’s Talk About It! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.Subscribed

Mass immigration is just one of the weapons being used against us. The globalists are also undermining our nation through currency manipulation, lowering our standard of living, trapping Australians in wage slavery, and breaking down the family unit. Piece by piece, they are eroding the foundations of our society.History shows us that strong men defend their families, their communities, and their nations. Yet today, masculinity itself is under attack. Men are told to sit down, be silent, and be ashamed of who they are. That must end.Voting once every three years is no longer enough. Politicians from both sides, left and right, have ignored the will of the people for far too long. The only solution now is for Australians to peacefully show up in force, to demonstrate their courage, and to give those timid masses at home the inspiration to rise and speak out as well.I call on men across Australia to stand up, to speak out, and to show up. Come out in force this weekend and defend our nation. The future of Australia depends on it.This should go without saying, but the legacy media and political establishment will attempt to discredit this movement. They will seize on any trouble, amplify it, and use it to smear all who attend as extremists, racists, or worse. Do not give them that opportunity. If you see anyone causing problems, shun them, remove them, and remain peaceful. Our strength is in our unity and discipline.Senator Ralph Babet.United Australia Party.Leave a comment

Senator Babet is an Australian Federal Senator, a committed advocate for freedom, and an unapologetic voice for common-sense conservatism. He is a passionate defender of Australian sovereignty, traditional values, and the right to speak the truth – no matter how unpopular it may be in the mainstream media or political establishment.Senator Babet created Let’s Talk About It as a platform to deliver unfiltered truth, bold ideas, and the real news they don’t want you to know – without censorship, spin, or corporate interference.“In an age of manufactured consent and media manipulation, telling the truth is an act of rebellion. Let’s Talk About It exists to inform, empower, and rally Australians who still believe in freedom, faith, and our way of life.”
— Senator Babet

The Fatal Impact of Further Mass Immigration to the U.S.A.

Posted on by
If mass immigration slowly destroys democracy, there is only one sustainable course of action. Sustainable immigration requires: Reducing legal immigration and Stopping illegal immigration. What limits – if any – will the next administration seek? I’m Rob Harding with Jeremy Beck. Welcome to the Sustainable Immigration Newsletter! Today, we are remembering the late physicist Albert Bartlett’s warning: “we are allowing our immigration driven population growth to slowly destroy democracy at home in the U.S.” But first… NumbersUSA in Greater Yellowstone Scientific Director Leon Kolankiewicz and CEO James Massa were in Big Sky, Montana earlier this month to unveil our Greater Yellowstone Sprawl Study at the 16th Biennial Scientific Conference on the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. The scientific study analyzes how sprawl – fueled largely by population growth, including growth from immigration – is transforming the ecological function of Greater Yellowstone, America’s most iconic wildlife-rich ecosystem. Presentation of the study’s findings was well-received and local media took notice. After the conference, the study’s release received a prominent introduction in the newsletter of Yellowstonian, the Livingston, Montana based conservation journalism organization co-founded by eminent environmental journalist and author Todd Wilkinson.

Leon (center) and James (right) in conversation with Todd Wilkinson (left), Big Sky MT

An e-version as well as a limited number of hard copies of the study will be available soon. See a preview of what’s to come at https://yellowstonesprawl.com/, including Todd Wilkinson’s inspiring foreword to the study.

In related news, be sure to read Leon’s personal report from Greater Yellowstone and Henry’s article on America’s overcrowded national parks.

Take Action

Diluting Democracy

“In a few generations,” Henry Barbaro writes, “an individual’s ‘voice’ has become a mere whisper” in the halls of Congress. In 1900, there was one U.S. representative for every 197,000 people. Today, the representation ratio has dropped to one for every 772,000 people. This is what Bartlett was talking about. Mass immigration drives U.S. population growth in an unsustainable direction. Henry continues:“Having the will of voters diluted in such a way can lead to voter apathy — a lack of interest among voters to participate in elections. In other words, a sense of disconnection and a belief that one’s vote doesn’t matter, which leads to low voter turnouts and less participation in other types of civic responsibilities. This creeping indifference towards the electoral process undermines the very foundation of democracy.”

And yet, our individual “whispers” echo through the halls of power when we take action together. When we eschew indifference and embrace the audacity of Democracy, our voices carry a thunderous message.

Take Action

Limiting immigration on a crowded planet

NumbersUSA Board Member Philip Cafaro co-authored an excellent response to a recent discussion paper titled Migration in Hotter Times: Humanity at Risk. The response effectively outlines a series of benchmark arguments against sentimentalist, globalist support for continued mass immigration.

“Does the responsibility developed countries carry for greenhouse gases oblige them to take in any migrant affected by climate change?” ask Cafaro and co-author Jane O’Sullivan.

The authors’ cautionary answer: “Forcing countries to accept more immigrants than they can sustainably absorb, or their citizens want, would mean the end of national sovereignty, representative democracy and any functional social contract. Strong welfare systems only persist where population growth is low and social cohesion is high.”

Read the articles and tell us what you think.

Advice for Trump and Harris

We cannot say how Professor Bartlett, who died eleven years ago this month, would respond to President Trump’s claim that we need to import more workers to do American work. But we suspect he would have urged the former president to “think about this for a moment”:“If a country has to import people to do the work of the country, then that country is not sustainable.”

“We have all heard the plaintive cry,” said Bartlett, “that ‘We can’t get Americans to do the work, so we have to import workers from other countries.’ Think about this for a moment. This is an absolute indicator of national unsustainability!”

A better approach for Trump would be to reclaim his well-stated position from his 2018 State of the Union Address:“The United States is a compassionate nation. We are proud that we do more than any other country to help the needy, the struggling, and the underprivileged all over the world. But as President of the United States, my highest loyalty, my greatest compassion, and my constant concern is for America’s children, America’s struggling workers, and America’s forgotten communities. I want our youth to grow up to achieve great things. I want our poor to have their chance to rise.”

As for Vice President Harris, Dr. Karen Shragg applauds her instinct to decry anti-immigrant sentiment, but says that alone is not enough:“She must address our nation’s voters and say, ‘Of course we don’t hate immigrants, we are a nation of immigrants, but we are at a different time in our history. We are no longer dominated by amber waves of grain, we are full of over 366 million Americans and can no longer fool ourselves that we can accommodate mass immigration, much of it illegal, because of how it will hurt most Americans. There are complicated reasons for the fuel behind the desires of migrants to come to our shores. Unsustainable growth in many countries is certainly one of them. Blaming the US history of exploitation of global resources as the only reason for the misery and suffering of those at our borders is no excuse to dissolve the sociological and ecological integrity within our sovereign borders, dashing the hopes and dreams of our own citizens.’”

EarthX recorded presentations now available on demand

You may recall seeing in May’s newsletter that our sustainable immigration outreach and education efforts got an energizing boost from EarthX’s Congress of Conferences in Dallas, Texas, where NumbersUSA and America’s immigration-driven population growth problem were on the agenda. Formal panels and on-stage presentations provided an avenue to disseminate our unique studies concerning the drivers and impacts of urban sprawl in America (for example, our Colorado study continues to inform the housing debate in Denver).

Leon presenting on the EarthxTV Stage, Dallas TX

View Scientific Director Leon Kolankiewicz’s presentation here. View ally Dr. Karen Shragg’s presentation here.

The big picture: too many people are consuming too much

In Losing Our Minds, conservationist Brad Meiklejohn asks:”Fifty years ago, the brightest minds in the United States were deeply concerned that 210 million Americans were too many and that 280 million would be “much too many.” Now that we total 335 million Americans, the titans of Silicon Valley claim that we are running out of people.
”How did we lose our minds so quickly?”

Meiklejohn observes that “very few prominent public intellectuals these days…have the courage to assert that 335 million Americans is “much too many”, and that a declining population might be a good, easing, dawning opportunity.”

Indeed. Now remember that federal immigration policy is the overwhelming driver of America’s current population growth, and federal immigration policy is projected to drive nearly all future population growth. Therefore, confronting unsustainable growth at its source requires reducing immigration to a level America can sustain.

In The Unbearable Anthropocentrism of Our World in Data, freelance journalist and author Chris Ketcham makes the case that “there’s no room for the wild things when humans, cows, chickens, pigs, dogs and cats crowd out everything else, so that 96 percent of mammalian biomass now consists of Homo sapiens and our domesticated animals.”

Ketcham shares a statistic that hits home: “Ninety-nine percent of the tallgrass prairie in North America, once the largest such ecosystem on Earth, has been wiped out.”

Will continuing to add 3.5 million people a year to America’s population through immigration make our conservation challenges easier to confront or harder?

In the age of limits, a sensible immigration policy means less immigration.

Thank you for all that you do,

Rob Harding and Jeremy Beck

PAUL FROMM & DR. SALEAM DIALOGUE

Posted on by

PAUL FROMM & DR. SALEAM DIALOGUE



PAUL FROMM & DR. SALEAM DIALOGUE

PAUL FROMM & DR. SALEAM DIALOGUE
Exciting dialogue between Paul Fromm, Canadian Association for Free Expression & Dr. Jim Saleam, Leader of the Australia First Party — The Great Replacement, the Guilt Industry & Threats to Free Speech
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SdZhRLjqkg4&ab_channel=NewAustralianBulletin

Canadians, Native-born & Immigrants Alike, Say No to Mass Immigration

Posted on by

Canadians say NO to mass immigration

By

Harrison Faulkner

–

June 17, 2024

din

Harrison Faulkner went to Mississauga to ask Canadians what they think about mass immigration. The Trudeau government has forced record levels of immigration over the past 6 years and Canadians have had enough. Polling indicates that a majority of Canadians, including immigrants, want to see the government reduce immigration levels.

What did people in downtown Mississauga have to say?

Watch the latest episode of Ratio’d to find out.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=ylhneBq_sg0%3Ffeature%3Doembed%26enablejsapi%3D1%26origin%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Ftnc.news

Author

  • Harrison Faulkner Harrison Faulkner Harrison Faulkner is the host of Ratio’d and co-host of Fake News Friday. He is also a journalist and producer for True North based in Toronto. Twitter: @Harry__Faulkner

Maxime Bernier Calls for Massive Immigration Cut to Help Save Canada’s Economy

Posted on by

Maxime Bernier Calls for Massive Immigration Cut to Help Save Canada’s Economy

Finance minister Chrystia Freeland is set to announce more irresponsible spending in her spring budget next month.

The Liberals will once again claim they’re doing this to help the middle class, and they will brag about being generous with our money.

But of course, they won’t be telling us how much more debt and future taxes this will bring.

And yet, we all know there’s a cheap, quick, and easy way to fix our most important economic problems:

Drastically cut the number of people entering Canada.

-It would lower demand for housing and allow construction to catch up and prices to go down.

-It would reduce pressure on healthcare, education, and other social services.

-It would lower business reliance on cheap foreign labour and force employers to hike wages to attract local workers.

-And it would encourage businesses to invest more in productivity improvements, which is the key to long-term growth.

-In short, it would undoubtedly benefit Canadians — actual Canadians living here and to whom this government is accountable, not the millions of new instant Canadians that it keeps bringing in.

So should we expect Chrystia Freeland to ask her colleague, the Immigration minister, to help her fix our economy?

Of course she won’t.

All the establishment politicians in Ottawa prefer to pander to immigrants rather than advocate for an easy solution that would cost nothing to improve the lives of Canadians.

Jerry, the People’s Party is the only party with the right solutions to fix our economy and put money back in your pockets.

The stronger the PPC becomes, the more pressure we can put on these out-of-touch politicians to face reality.

The end of March is fast arriving, and our goal is to raise $100,000 in the next three weeks to wrap up the first quarter.

Jerry, can I count on your support?

Donating to the PPC is also a cheap and easy way to promote the right solutions to fix our economy!

Please pitch in $10 today to help us reach our end-of-quarter goal!

Thank you,

-Max