https://www.facebook.com/518530108/posts/10173713155890109/?app=fbl
February 15th marked the day that a symbol of our identity was stolen from us in an attempt to disconnect Canadians from their heritage.
The Red Ensign is the true flag of the Canadian people and it is the flag of the Counter-Revolution.
Canadians must reclaim what was stolen from us and raise the Red Ensign. Millions must fly.
🍁OUR PEOPLE 🍁 OUR HOME 🍁 OUR FUTURE
Emily Goldstein works as a copy editor at ProPublica, an investigative journalism organization. In August 2024, ProPublica addressed disinformation about her, clarifying that she did not author a controversial 2015 article for Thought Catalog titled “Yes, Diversity Is About Getting Rid of White People (And That’s a Good Thing).” The article was later removed by Thought Catalog, and Goldstein has never been employed by or contributed to the platform.
However, Emily Goldstein, who falsely claimed to be White herself, proudly exposed the exact harm that her people’s power system is causing us. This article has been accused of being a fake. If this is the case, the author, Emily Goldstein, has a wealth of knowledge about the mindset that governs the Jewish power structure.
She stated, “My white students often ask me how they can ‘atone’ for the evils of whiteness and how they can make up for centuries of white oppression. And I tell them: you can do that by not having any children and ensuring that the white race does not live to oppress anyone ever again in the future.”
Even though her article was removed, this site managed to get hold of it to reproduce it to you word by word. It reads:
“ONE of the more common memes that I’ve seen white supremacists spread around recently has been ‘diversity is a code word for white genocide’. The concept here is that diversity is only promoted in white nations, and that the end goal is to eliminate white people altogether by flooding all white countries with non-white people until there are no white people left. Well, guess what, white supremacists? That’s exactly right. Diversity IS about getting rid of white people, and that’s a good thing.
First off, I am a white person myself, so allow me to get that out of the way. I’m extremely glad that the white race is dying, and you should be too. White people do not have a right to exist. Period. That may sound like a bold statement, but it’s entirely true. Any white person with even the faintest knowledge of history should curse themselves every single day for being white. Throughout all of recorded history, whites have engaged in oppression, genocide, colonialism, imperialism, and just plain evil on a massive scale.
White people have denied every other race the right to exist, and have – at some point in history – oppressed every single race on the planet. Why, then, should whites now be allowed to live in peace when whites have historically been the world’s #1 source of conflict and oppression? Whiteness is racism. Period. Whiteness is the source of all oppression in the world. Whiteness is racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, and heteropatriarchal capitalism. Eliminate whiteness and you eliminate every single form of oppression that the world currently faces. No white people means no oppression. White people are like a cancer and oppression is a symptom of the cancer. Cut out the cancer altogether – with the cancer being white people – and you get rid of all of the oppression which white people cause.
I have dedicated my life to fighting racism, and I have determined – based on all available evidence – that the only way to really eliminate racism is to eliminate whiteness. Whiteness is the ocean from which racism flows. Get rid of whiteness and you get rid of racism. Despite what white supremacists often claim, white people do not have a “culture”. White ‘culture’ consists of nothing more than oppression, genocide, and the disenfranchisement of minorities. White “culture” is racism and nothing more. When white supremacists talk about “white culture”, what they’re really talking about is racism.
Over the course of history, white people have built a massive empire based entirely on the hard work of oppressed and disenfranchised minority groups. But guess what, white people? That empire is finally coming to an end now, and its demise is music to my hears. To quote the great anti-racist activist Tim Wise: ‘Do you hear it? The sound of your empire dying? Your nation, as you knew it, ending, permanently? Because I do, and the sound of its demise is beautiful.‘
Descendants of Holocaust survivors can personally attest to the evil that white people are capable of when they hold the reins of power. Thankfully, whites won’t be holding the reins of power for much longer. When white people die out, so will racism, sexism, queerphobia, and all other forms of oppression. The only way to eliminate racism, white privilege, and white supremacy is to eliminate whiteness altogether. When I teach my students about human rights, critical race theory, and the role of whites in worldwide oppression, my white students often ask me how they can “atone” for the evils of whiteness and how they can make up for centuries of white oppression. And I tell them: you can do that by not having any children and ensuring that the white race does not live to oppress anyone ever again in the future.
Thankfully, white birthrates are indeed very low, while the birthrates of minorities are much, MUCH higher. Within our lifetimes, whites will be a minority in a significant number of formerly white countries, including the US, the UK, France, Germany, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand, to name just a few. To white supremacists yearning for the days when whites could rape and pillage the world with impunity, this is incredibly frightening. To people on the right side of history, however, this looks like progress.
Whites are finally getting their just desserts – and it’s about time. I sincerely hope that, when the white power structure finally comes crashing down, whites will receive no mercy from the minority groups that whites have spent centuries oppressing. We certainly don’t deserve any mercy or kindness, as we have given nothing of the sort to others.
Whites should also know that, when they do become a minority in formerly white countries, they will NOT be receiving affirmative action or any of the other benefits meant to assist the minorities that whites have historically oppressed. Why? Because whites don’t deserve those benefits. It’s as simple as that. One can look to South Africa, where whites are only about 8.4% of the population, but blacks continue to receive affirmative action because blacks in South Africa have historically been disenfranchised by whites.
The same thing will happen when whites become a minority in North America, Europe, and Oceania, because whites have historically oppressed minorities in all three of those continents. Not to mention, why should whites receive any kind of benefits when the ultimate goal is to get rid of whites altogether? Finally, laws against hate speech will serve to prevent whites from complaining about this, as any white person who complains will be arrested, given a long prison sentence, and made an example of for the rest of the remaining white population. Speech that attempts to justify the white power structure and perpetuate white oppression of minorities is not freedom of speech, and it has absolutely no place in modern society.
As white people, we all need to recognize that we no longer have a place in the world. This world now belongs to the minorities that us whites have spent centuries oppressing, and there is absolutely nothing that any pathetic white supremacists can do about it.
In order for a better world to be created, white people need to be exterminated. Period. It’s as simple as that. We should simply be thankful that our death will be accomplished through mass immigration and declining birthrates. When whites have exterminated other races, it wasn’t nearly so peaceful – it was done through violent genocide. But other races are not as evil as whites are, and it’s important to remember that. The world belongs to minorities now, and they will make a much better, more peaceful world with what they’re given. Only when white people have ceased to exist will a peaceful and progressive society – free of racism and hatred – be possible. The only way to eliminate white privilege, white oppression, white racism, and the oppressive white power structure is to eliminate white people altogether.
Oh, yes, white supremacists: diversity is indeed white genocide. And white genocide is exactly what the world needs more than anything else.”
India’s High Commissioner to Canada stated because of Canada and India’s “complimentary economies,” Canada should be keen to welcome 60 million more Indians into the country.
Dinesh K. PatnaikPhoto Credit: Leah Mushet, WS; ChatGPT
Published on:
02 Mar 2026, 12:48 pm
CALGARY — India’s High Commissioner to Canada stated because of Canada and India’s “complimentary economies,” Canada should be keen to welcome 60 million more Indians into the country.
In an interview with CBC News on Saturday, Commissioner Dinesh K. Patnaik, echoed sentiments of a mutually beneficial economic strategy, which he believes includes a large increase of Indian immigrants.
“You have things which we need, and we have things which you need,” stated Patnaik.
“For example, you have the second largest [geographical] country in the world — with a 40 million population, you need at least over 100 million population.”
https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?cght&widgetsVersion=2615f7e52b7e0%3A1702314776716&width=550px
Patnaik is referring to India’s high population — as India yields the highest population in the world with an estimated 1.4 billion people in 2026, which it would be willing to lend to Canada.
“You need people to man many of your resources,” stated Patnaik.
“We have the capacity, we have the intellect, we have the talent, we have the resources.”
According to Statistics Canada, the country’s population is approximately 41 million in 2026.
In 2021, 44%, or 1.1 million, of Canada’s population was Indian, the largest group of South Asians in the country.
India’s Ministry of External Affairs reports, as of 2025, Canada has 2.8 million Indians in the country.
What Patnaik was insinuating was that since Canada needs 100 million individuals in order to truly actualize its economic potential — Indians would help to do so.
Statistics Canada has already predicted by 2041, Canada’s South Asian population (which includes more than just Indians), will reach 4.7 to 6.5 million people.
But Patnaik is suggesting something different — he is advocating 60 million of India’s citizens leave the country.
This advice would go against what the feds have claimed their current immigration plans are.
Last fall, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) announced a return of immigration levels in the country to “sustainable levels.”
The IRCC states they expect to issue 408,000 study permits in the next year; of this number, 155,000 will be for new international students.
They also state this is a 7% decrease from 2025 numbers.
This is related to a lowering of Canada’s Indian immigration since, a report on public college international student demographics from Statistics Canada states in the 2023 to 2024 academic year, 59% of students were coming from India.
The IRCC also stated they are reducing their permanent resident (PR) targets and their temporary resident (TR) targets between 2025 and 2027.
It reported in 2025, there were 146,395 fewer new workers compared to the same period in 2024.
The Liberals’ newcomer apocalypse has finally turned into their worst political problem. Hospitals are overburdened, schools are struggling with second-language students, job prospects remain poor, birthright citizenship continues to exist and judges routinely help criminals and fraudsters remain in-country.
None of this will go away by nibbling away at the edges of immigration law, which is all the Liberals plan to do with the bill they’re pitching to Canadians as the solution: C-12.
Currently before the Senate, Bill C-12 would add a handful of conveniences to the immigration minister’s tool box. In theory, it would make information sharing between government agencies easier, bar temporary residents who have been here for more than a year from claiming asylum, and allow the minister to cancel visas and visa applications, among other things.
But these are only half-solutions to deeper problems. Easier screening thanks to better information-sharing in government is nice, but there are currently thousands of refugees from some of the most dangerous countries in the world who received protected person status without proper screening. What’s happening with them? Nothing, as far as the Liberals are concerned.
Instead of ending asylum abuse, Bill C-12 merely gives it a deadline. Barring those who have been in Canada for a year from making asylum claims will work on desperate international students trying to buy more time as they approach graduation … while still allowing anyone on a visitor visa to join the asylum queue and instantly get health coverage superior to that of a Canadian citizen. (The cost of providing enhanced care to the thousands of claimants will be $1 billion this year, rising to $1.5 billion in 2030.)
And the problem of birthright citizenship remains: any international student, temporary worker or asylum seeker who has a kid in Canada establishes a permanent umbilical cord to our social safety net.
Most significant about Bill C-12 is that it would give the immigration minister the power to cancel permanent resident visas, temporary visas, work permits and study permits. Theoretically, it could be used against criminals, but the Liberals aren’t bothered by foreigner crime; plus, if they wanted to actually expel these people with haste, they’d write it directly into the law.
BILL C-12 GUARANTEES VERY LITTLE.
Similarly, C-12 could be used to cancel whole classes of permanent residents — something that the Liberals won’t do, because that would mean admitting that they’ve been handing out PR like it’s free swag at a trade show. The French-language stream of the Express Entry program, for example, routinely accepts people with immigration scores so low that they shouldn’t even be getting temporary visas, let alone permanent ones. Don’t expect the Liberals to do anything about it, though: they frequently brag about exceeding francophone immigration targets.
It’s notable that C-12 could also be used to set country caps going forward, whether they be neutral (the same cap for everyone to prevent a single country from dominating), or targeted (lower caps for crime-exporting countries with low cultural compatibility). That’s theoretical and unlikely; Liberals would likely condemn any mention of country caps as racist.
So, Bill C-12 guarantees very little. It won’t block asylum applicants from safe countries; it won’t remove criminal non-citizens; it leaves most procedural excesses in immigration law untouched; it doesn’t even appear that it will block foreign extortionists from claiming asylum once they run into legal trouble. The bill does tinker with the wording of the rules for asylum seekers charged with crimes, but the gist is the same as what’s on the books right now: if an immigration officer doesn’t think it’s necessary to cancel an asylum application from a person with active serious charges, they don’t have to. Meanwhile, both the existing legislation and the proposed changes are silent on less-serious crimes, which means that many lawbreakers will remain free to make asylum claims.
And remember, the second any visas are mass-cancelled, court challenges will be filed. The Liberals fold like a wet noodle at any mention of “Charter rights,” so any hard stances they take could just as easily be walked back.
Finally, for Bill C-12 to be of any use, it requires ministerial initiative. Immigration Minister Lena Diab will not deliver that. Stakeholder meetings are allegedly a rarity in her office, and her default state is utter cluelessness. Even her sensitive files are handled with neglect. Case in point from earlier this month: her sign-off was needed to authorize the deportation of a fake refugee convicted of threatening to kill a Crown prosecutor, but a recent court decision mentioned that she hadn’t given it. If she can’t be bothered to eject such an obvious menace to Canadian society, she’s not about to purge the immigration queue.
Not even Diab’s Liberal colleagues think she’s doing a good job: nine of her anonymous caucus-mates expressed misgivings about her leadership to the CBC in a report published Wednesday, and when Liberal MP Ben Carr spoke to reporters in a scrum on Wednesday, he couldn’t bring himself to praise her.
Asked, “Is she good?” Carr replied: “Well, what does that mean, ‘Is she good?’ … We could certainly sit down over coffee and have a long conversation about where there are challenges and opportunities across a variety of different files but I think it’s an unfair characterization of any minister to say, ‘Are they doing good or not?’ ”
You know the Liberals feel they’re in big trouble when they can’t even bring themselves to give a little bit of self-praise. And they’re not even panicking yet — just wait until Bill C-12 passes and reveals itself to be a dud. Then we’re really in for fun.
Now that the immigration system — in particular, as it relates to refugees — has come under the harsh light of public scrutiny, Justice Minister Sean Fraser is lashing out at its critics: “We are dealing with, in some instances, some of the most vulnerable people in the world,” he said Wednesday, implying that anyone who touches the issue is a bully.
But the Liberal handling of the immigration file — including Fraser’s personal handling of it from 2021 to 2023 — gives Canadians plenty of reasons to question the asylum system. Immigration officials for years have been mass-approving refugee applications from some of the most dangerous countries in the world by simply rubber-stamping paperwork without an in-person hearing. Untold numbers of fraudsters, terrorists and criminals now have protected person status in Canada, giving them access to generous state benefits and a much higher bar to deportation if convicted of a crime.
A full narrative of this disaster was put together in a January C.D. Howe report by James Yousif, a former immigration tribunal adjudicator and policy director for the government. In 2016, the federal refugee tribunal began getting overwhelmed with claims to the point where it faced the prospect of dissolution. In a desperate bid to keep the lights on, it designed a shortcut to approve asylum claims, reduce the backlog and boost output numbers. This was called “file review.”
“File review,” according to the government, fast-tracked claims from countries and claim types with over an 80 per cent acceptance rate, or those supported by reliable identity documents, or those where the “evidence (of risk) is not ambiguous,” or those where “complex legal or factual issues do not often arise at the hearing.” This was construed to the public in one departmental report as a resource-saver which cut processing time in half.
Among those countries that qualified for rubber-stamping? Afghanistan, Burundi, Djibouti, Egypt, Eritrea, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Nigeria, Pakistan, Russia, Rwanda, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent, Sudan, Syria, Turkey and Yemen. People claiming asylum from those places are more likely to be in genuine danger, but they are also places of terror and organized crime. Not only does the fast pass through security screening put Canadians in danger, it allows terrorists to follow real refugees who settle here. This has been the plight of our Yazidi refugees — former sex slaves of ISIS — who reported in early 2019 that they were being harassed over the phone by men speaking Arabic, and over texts that referred to their enslavement.
Little could be done to remove a country or claim type from the fast-track list, because once it was on that list, it would generate so many positive asylum decisions that it became an even stronger candidate for fast-tracking. As Yousif put it, “The policy feeds itself with data that have been produced by the policy itself.”
Naturally, Canada’s acceptance rate for asylum claims shot up, rising from 63 per cent in 2018 to 80 per cent in 2024.
This is far from the first bombshell to hit the reputation of the Liberal immigration system. This week, Parliamentarians have been aghast at a Parliamentary Budget Officer report from earlier this month, which projects that the federal health plan covering asylum applicants and rejects will climb to $1.5 billion in 2030.
Over the summer, it became known that the immigration department forgave thousands of foreigners’ criminal records, rendering them legally admissible to Canada. Meanwhile, there are nearly 30,000 people whose deportations are “in progress” according to the Canadian Border Services Agency — which means they’re still here, and they shouldn’t be.
These deportation figures don’t reflect the scale of the problem because they represent only those people who failed to meet an already low bar. And while the most recent example of look-theother-way admissions comes to us from Yousif’s report on the asylum system, similar negligence has occurred in the area of temporary work permits. In 2024, the Toronto Star reported that immigration officials had been directed to skip fraud-prevention measures, even as immigration fraud was happening all over Canada.
Not even the checks on the system can be relied upon to correct these problems. Immigration tribunals hire a portion of their decision-makers to fill diversity quotas, and in 2021, as Yousif points out, they drastically lowered standards for new hires, dropping legal and subject-matter expertise requirements.
A step above, at the Federal Court, it was little different: the feds have prioritized diversity and activism in their judicial appointments, resulting in a bench staffed by gates-open judges like Avvy Yao-yao Go, famed for giving second chances to the most obvious abusers of asylum imaginable. Most recently, Go gave a Pakistani refugee another shot at keeping his status, even though he travelled freely to Pakistan six times after being resettled here — a clear demonstration that he doesn’t need Canada’s protection.
There was a time in Canada when our capacity to shelter good people in need was a point of pride. Now, many Canadians are wondering how many of the people taking advantage of their hospitality are either good or in need at all: just in October, the Environics Institute found that 43 per cent of Canadians agreed that “many people claiming to be refugees are not real refugees.”
Despite Minister Fraser’s bad-faith accusations against those who question the legitimacy of the “vulnerable people,” it was up to him and his colleagues to ensure immigration decisions could be trusted. They failed. (National Post, February 28, 2026)
Turning Back the Invasion
 |
| Dear Robert,Urgent: We are launching a coordinated Call to Action to urge public officials and school principals across Canada to immediately stop promoting or celebrating Ramadan in taxpayer-funded institutions. Ramadan is often presented as a sacred month of fasting and reflection, with politicians issuing glowing statements and public schools organizing celebrations for students. However, the reality is that it marks the anniversary of the Battle of Badr (AD 624), a savage conquest in which Muslim forces brutally slaughtered and subjugated non-Muslims. These are not Canadian values. Be warned: Conquest of Western nations is pursued not only by the sword but through gradual demands for accommodations of foreign ideologies—a strategy known as “Stealth Jihad.” Canada must reject these encroachments and defend our heritage before they take root. So as not to repeat the facts, read the letter below for the detailed concerns, historical context, and constitutional arguments. This effort is rooted in defending our Christian heritage and constitutional foundations against ideologies incompatible with our values. For further background on the Christian foundations of our nation, read:Canada is a Christian NationCall to Action: 1. Copy and paste the following letter (or write your own). Start by sending it to PM Mark Carney, Premiers and your MP/MLA/MPP and, if necessary, your local school principals, school board trustees, government representatives, RCMP detachments and other relevant public officials.2. Share this campaign with others. Emails: Mark Carney: PM@pm.gc.ca and Your Local MP: Search by Postal Code and also BCC: callto@action4canada.com List of Premiers and more public officials (eg MLA/MPP) see HERE Your voice matters! Together, we can defend and reclaim Canada’s true heritage!___________________________________________________________________ Subject: Urgent Request to Prohibit Promotion of Ramadan in Canadian Public Institutions Attention Public Official, This letter is in response to your support and promotion to celebrate Ramadan. Are you aware of what Ramadan truly represents? It marks the anniversary of the Battle of Badr (AD 624)—a savage conquest in which Muslim forces brutally slaughtered and subjugated non-Muslims. Celebrated as a triumph in jihad, this pivotal victory has inspired Muslims for centuries. Rooted in the Quran and Sharia law, it glorifies aggression and domination, paving the way for Islam’s rapid, violent expansion beyond Arabia and eventually into the Western world—at the cost of millions of lives lost in wars, raids, and forced conversions. These are values that have no place in our peaceful nation. Islam operates as a political and military system aimed at global dominance, often operating under the guise of religion. The Quran contains 164 Jihad verses and over 109 verses explicitly calling for violence and death against non-believers, such as: Quran 9:5: “Then kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, capture them and besiege them, and lie in wait for them in each and every ambush.” Quran 8:12: “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore, strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them.” These are not relics of the past; they fuel ongoing threats to democracy. In Europe and the UK, seemingly innocuous accommodations—like celebrating Ramadan—have opened the floodgates to Sharia courts operating alongside national laws, Islamist influence in education and local governments, and jihadist attacks (e.g., Manchester Arena, London Bridge). What begins as “tolerance” too often ends in subjugation. Canada is currently on the same destructive trajectory. Recent statements from high-level officials underscore the urgency of this issue. Prime Minister Mark Carney’s February 17, 2026, message describing Ramadan as a “holy month” and wishing “Ramadan Mubarak” normalizes an ideology incompatible with our values and encourages similar endorsements in publicly funded institutions. This highlights the need for clear guidelines to prevent taxpayer-supported entities from advancing foreign political agendas under the banner of religious tolerance. Canada must not follow this path. As a Christian nation, founded on Judeo-Christian principles as affirmed in the preamble to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms—“Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the Supremacy of God and the Rule of Law”—we reject such encroachments. Section 2(a) on freedom of religion was designed to shield the Christian church from government interference, not to safeguard foreign political ideologies. Section 93 of the Constitution Act, 1867, protects only Protestant and Catholic education rights—a position upheld by the Supreme Court in Adler v. Ontario (1996). King Charles III’s Coronation Oath—pledging to uphold the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law—solidifies Canada’s Christian Constitutional identity. Finally, our common law, which is the foundation of law in Canada, does not recognize any other system or form of law, including Islamic Sharia law. This imparts a duty upon all public officials to only recognize our common law. “The law of England is wisely reluctant to admit any doctrine which is repugnant to the settled principles and policy of its own institution.” Brook v Brook 1858 6 WR 452. For more on Canada’s Christian foundations, see: Canada is a Christian NationOur schools, government offices, the RCMP, and other taxpayer-funded entities are not institutions to promote, accommodate, or normalize this Islamic threat. Based on the aforementioned, I strongly urge the immediate cessation of all Ramadan-related activities, promotions, statements, and accommodations in your institution, and instead prioritize Canadian heritage and historical events that reflect our true identity, to safeguard our democratic values and Christian heritage. Please provide a prompt response outlining your position and any planned actions. Thank you for upholding the principles that define our nation. ACT4CANADA |
