Diversity is A Code Word for White Extinction

Posted on by
Category: Uncategorized

Auron MacIntyre Interviews Peter Brimelow on Birthright Citizenship

Posted on by

Auron MacIntyre Interviews Peter Brimelow on Birthright Citizenship

ong other things, bring on the fistfight over a Constitutional Amendment abolishing Birthright Citizenship!

 
READ IN APP
 

Peter Brimelow writes: I am most grateful to Auron MacIntyre for interviewing me on June 22. It produced an impressive flow of new subscribers to this substack (it’s free, but some heroic individuals paid!). We covered a lot of ground—including my contention that the recent Makerfield byelection, literally held in my and John Derbyshire’s ancestral hearth of Wigan, was actually a strong result for British immigration patriots, masked by poor expectation management and the usual media mendacity. The whole thing is viewable below. But here I’m just transcribing our discussion of the imminent U.S. Supreme Court decision on Birthright Citizenship, the jugular of the Great Replacement, which begins at 43:57.

p.s. I had a haircut today

PeterBrimelow.com is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Peter Brimelow: The other issue, as you have mentioned, is Birthright Citizenship. God knows what the Roberts court is going to do. He’s not distinguished by courage in these areas. But it doesn’t actually matter because what we’re talking about is an Executive Order.

At VDARE.com, we were writing about Birthright Citizenship, the need to cut it off, for 25 years but it never occurred to us that it could be done by Executive Order. We assumed it was going to have to be done by statute, there are ways to do it, or by a Constitutional Amendment. If it was done by Executive Order, that could be reversed,

What we need, of course, is to get this issue into politics, because most Americans have absolutely no idea at all that, if you come here illegally, or even as a tourist, and have a child here, that child’s an American citizen.

And not only do they have no idea about it, when they discover it they get extremely angry. They think that the whole thing is crazy, as of course it is.

That’s why I like the idea of a Constitutional Amendment. That has to be ratified by two-thirds of the states. So in two-thirds of the states, there has to be a fistfight over whether or not we should have Birthright Citizenship.

Make the Democrats stand up and justify it. That’s going to do them no good at all with Americans.

I would like to think that the Trump Administration has a whole battery of responses to a bad ruling—there are both moves to get a Constitutional Amendment and also statutory reform introduced in the House at the moment. They’ve just not been taken up by the Republican leadership.

They should be taken up if this decision goes the wrong way. They should be taken up right away—immediately.

I’d like to think the Trump Administration is well prepared for that, but, you know he’s had all these foreign wars to fight. and stuff like that.

But I am confident Steven Miller is thinking about it.

Getting Called A Racist

Posted on by
Category: Uncategorized | Tags:

The Kalergi Plan: Blueprint for White Genocide: It’s Happening Today

Posted on by

‘If you want to understand what’s happening in Europe, you need to understand what was written nearly 100 years ago.

In 1925, Austrian-Japanese aristocrat Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi published Practical Idealism, outlining his vision for the future of Europe. He was the founder of the Pan-European Union, the first modern movement for a united Europe—a precursor to today’s EU.

What did he advocate?

A post-national Europe, ruled by an elite, with national identities gradually erased and replaced by a new “Eurasian-Negroid” population. He described this future population as “easily governable”—a homogenized, cultureless mass, stripped of tribal loyalties, patriotic feeling, or ethnic distinction.

He praised the idea of a European elite disconnected from national heritage, composed primarily of technocrats and financiers. He believed this ruling class should engineer Europe’s transformation from the top down.

His vision wasn’t fringe. Kalergi was openly supported by powerful figures, including Austrian Chancellor Ignaz Seipel, French politicians like Aristide Briand, and even later, Winston Churchill. He was the first recipient of the Charlemagne Prize—an award still given today to those who advance European integration (recent recipients include Merkel, Macron, and Zelensky).

The Kalergi Plan was a roadmap.

Since the 1990s, Europe has experienced:

– Deliberate mass immigration, destabilizing borders and reshaping demographics

– Aggressive multicultural policies, promoting division over unity

– Suppression of national identity, labeled as “extremism”

– Elite-driven governance, increasingly removed from democratic accountability

It’s all there. Written down.

A clear blueprint celebrated by the architects of modern Europe.

We are watching a careful plan executed step by step.

https://t.me/LauraAbolichannelhttps://t.me/truth_as_power/4074

See less

Read The Cult of Kalergi by Paul Fromm. $10 postpaid from C-FAR Books, P.O. Box 332, Rexdale, ON., M9W 5L3, CANADA. Cash or cheque payable to Paul Fromm

Posted on by
Beijing’s Trojan Horse Rolls Into Canada: A National-Security Scholar Warns Carney’s Chinese EV Deal Embeds Sabotage Risk in the Country’s Roads, Ports and Grids

OTTAWA — China keeps finding inventive ways to burrow into the West, and Canada’s new appetite for Chinese electric vehicles may be the most consequential opening yet.That is the warning at the center of a report published this week by the Macdonald-Laurier Institute and written by Brenda Shaffer, an energy and national-security specialist who teaches at the United States Naval Postgraduate School. China, she writes, “continues to find creative ways to infiltrate and influence the West,” embedding in its exports the capacity to surveil citizens, disrupt transportation and ports, and trigger blackouts and grid damage.Shaffer situates the electric-vehicle question inside a wider argument about hybrid warfare. China, Russia and Iran, she notes, have each written attacks on Western domestic energy infrastructure into their war doctrines, erasing the old line between the home front and the battlefield. Even brief disruptions to electricity or transit, she argues, could spread public panic and erode support for a distant conflict — the defense of Taiwan being the obvious test.The cars began arriving in June, the product of a strategic partnership Prime Minister Mark Carney signed in Beijing in January. Ottawa cut its tariff on Chinese electric vehicles from 100 percent to 6.1 percent, opening an initial quota of roughly 49,000 vehicles in the first year. Carney has cast the imports as a low-cost route for Canadians switching to electric, and analysts cited by Shaffer expect Chinese brands to capture a fifth of the Canadian market.Shaffer leans on an internal Public Safety Canada memo, obtained under access-to-information law, warning that opening the market to “high-risk vendors” invites connected cars that “collect significant amounts of data on Canadians, which can have intelligence value.” Her account of the official response is withering. Asked how Canada would protect drivers, the chief of the defense staff, General Jennie Carignan, told reporters only that “we don’t have a lot of Chinese vehicles so far,” and Defense Minister David McGuinty said he would raise the question with base commanders.The danger, in her telling, runs well past cars. A congressional probe found hidden communications equipment inside Chinese-made cranes at major American ports; the same cranes are common in Canadian harbors, where Transport Canada began assessing the risk in 2023. More worrying still are solar power inverters — the devices that feed renewable energy into the grid — of which China supplies about 70 percent worldwide. American investigators have identified undeclared communication components inside some Chinese inverters that experts warn could be used to switch them off remotely and destabilize power grids. Lithuania has banned Chinese inverters outright and the European Union has moved to bar them from public funding, while Canada, Shaffer writes, has imposed no comparable limits — even as the January partnership commits Ottawa and Beijing to deepen cooperation on solar, wind and battery storage.Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre’s auto policy would prohibit Chinese-made vehicles from proximity to Canadian Forces bases and other sensitive or strategic infrastructure. In Washington, where opposition to Chinese electric vehicles is one of the few genuinely bipartisan positions, President Donald Trump has called the deal a disaster for Canada, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said Canada would live to regret it, and the U.S. ambassador, Peter Hoekstra, vowed the cars would never reach American roads: “We’re not going to open the floodgates to have Chinese cars coming into the US from Canada.”Shaffer’s alarm is echoed, from a different vantage, by Michael Kovrig, the former Canadian diplomat held in China for more than 1,000 days. In testimony to Parliament this spring, Kovrig described the deal as a “trifecta of risks” — structural dependence, unfair competition that erodes industrial capacity, and systemic pressure on government policy — and warned that the People’s Republic “weaponizes technology, supply chains and market access” to force acquiescence to its agenda.Commenting this week on his own testimony, Kovrig wrote on social media that opening Canada’s market to Chinese electric vehicles “should be assessed not as a normal trade agreement, but as a tactical gamble that risks deep entanglement.” The Chinese Communist Party, he wrote, “pours enormous resources into the sector to build scale and sustain overcapacity.” He went on: “The pattern is to flood, consolidate and weaponize. We’ve seen China do this before with solar panels, steel, ships and drones, and EVs are now moving through the same stages in global markets.”The warnings have not slowed Carney’s government, which is pressing ahead at full speed. Industry Minister Mélanie Joly spent much of last week in China, courting BYD, Chery, Geely and Shanghai Launch Automotive Technology to build electric vehicles on Canadian soil, and confirmed that the import quota will keep climbing — rising by 6.5 percent a year from 49,000 vehicles in 2026 to roughly 67,000 annually by 2031. Carney, caught on a hot microphone with Trump at the Group of Seven summit in France, defended the arrangement as “less than 3 per cent of our market, 49,000 cars,” telling the president, “It’s a cap, we capped, a hard line.”Beijing is pleased.Geely Holding Group’s Lotus-brand electric vehicles will reach Canada next month — the first such models sold under the 49,000-vehicle quota — China’s ambassador to Canada, Wang Di, told Reuters on Friday. The cars would arrive, he said, “and they will be holding a ceremony when the cars are delivered in Montreal,” a milestone in the trade pivot Carney has pursued to move Canada away from dependence on the United States.On June 26, the Chinese Communist Party’s state-run China Daily approvingly reported Canada’s pledge to lift its exports to China by 50 percent by 2030. At a Canada Day reception at the Canadian embassy in Beijing, the mission’s chargé d’affaires, Mark Richardson, called Canada “a stable, reliable partner — a partner that builds and values relationships for the long term,” adding, “That includes with China.” Of Carney’s January visit, he said: “To say this has been a significant year for Canada–China relations would be an understatement. In many ways, it has been a turning point.” He noted that Canada had become a major energy exporter to China and observed that “the first shipment of Chinese-made electric vehicles has arrived in Canada under a new quota that was agreed in January.” Disclosure: The author appeared on a panel at the Hudson Institute in May, convened by senior fellow Michael Doran, alongside research fellow Zineb Riboua and Professor Brenda Shaffer, whose Macdonald-Laurier Institute commentary is discussed in this report.
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more
 
READ IN APP
 

DR. FAUCI & COVID EXPOSED:Enough to Hang Him

Posted on by

Enough to Hang Him
by Earl P. Holt III
To her eternal credit, in her final days in office, Director of National
Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard released conclusive evidence of Anthony
Fauci’s countless crimes committed as COVID commissar. Gabbard
provided evidence proving that Fauci funded the research at the
Wuhan Lab, he engaged in a massive, government-wide cover-up of
that crime, he censored and threatened the dissenting voices of
honest experts, and he perjured himself before Congress multiple
times. Below is one of two articles I wrote on this subject several
years ago.
I’ve got a theory, but unlike Marxist Theory, it’s based on evidence
rather than ideology, and therefore amenable to change in light of
contradictory evidence. My theory explains all the currently available
evidence better than any other of which I’m aware, and it seems
eminently plausible. In fact, it is exactly the sort of scheme in which
“Democrats” and other communists would engage.
Trump was the first prominent American to publicly denounce China for
its dishonest and corrupt trade practices, a 20-year crusade that
definitely contributed to his being elected president. China had been
eating our lunch for decades, but no one besides Trump had the guts to
call out China because so many in our political class and donor class are
heavily invested in Chinese firms and in U.S. firms doing business there.
Trump correctly pointed out what serious people already knew but
didn’t dare to say: China has manipulated its currency to discourage
imports from America, thereby generating $500 Billion in annual trade
surpluses to benefit itself. It has also stolen $500 Billion per year in
proprietary technology (trade secrets) from U.S. firms as a
precondition for their doing business there. Using these stolen

technologies, China has often reverse-engineered American products
and competed with these same American firms in international
markets.
Trump was the first president who attempted to hold China
accountable for its illegal trade practices, all of which violated the many
promises China agreed to when seeking Most Favored Nation trade
status with the U.S. and admission to the World Trade Organization.
Its windfalls from illegal trade helped fund China’s massive military
buildup. In retaliation for those trade practices, Trump imposed tariffs
on Chinese imports that totaled tens of billions of dollars in revenue for
several years during his first presidency.

Unmerited Privileges for Communist China

The Trump economy was soon roaring along at just under four percent
GDP growth by late 2019, fueled by Trump’s significant deregulation of
the U.S. economy and sweeping federal income tax reductions to
benefit the middle-class. Many “rust-belt” industries, like small steel
foundries, even began to make recoveries after being given Last Rights
by the Obama Administration.
Facing four more years of Trump’s tariffs on their exports and Trump’s
loud denunciations of China as an international pariah, China’s leaders

came up with a plan to damage Trump’s re-election prospects by
sabotaging the Trump economy. They intentionally unleashed the
COVID pandemic on the world, knowing it would quickly infect the
U.S. because of the immense volume of human and commercial traffic
between our two nations. They also recognized that certain quisling
Americans would help obscure COVID’s origins because they had
illegally participated in its funding.
China’s leaders knew they could also rely on the World Health
Organization’s (WHO) Director-General to lie and alibi for them,
because it was China’s power and influence that initially got him his
position at the WHO. Indeed, it was Director-General (and Ethiopian
communist) Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus who has publicly parroted
China’s disinformation efforts to this day, claiming that COVID
originated in Wuhan’s “wet markets” rather than China’s Level 4
Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV.) (Like the commie he is, he has
privately conceded that COVID was engineered at the WIV.)
U.S. public health officials like Anthony Fauci at the National Institute
for Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) treasonously repeated
such disinformation from the WHO and China, causing the U.S. to lose
valuable time responding to the pandemic. Fauci and the NIAID were in
a very difficult position from the start, since Fauci had helped fund the
Wuhan Institute of Virology’s “gain of function” research that China’s
military used to convert an innocuous and naturally-occurring bat virus
into a pandemic that killed more than one million Americans, and seven
million more citizens, worldwide.
Once the pandemic arrived in America, the New Communist Party of
the USA (NCPUSA) — misleadingly called “Democrats” — did what they
always do by rushing to exploit any tragedy for their own political gain.
They immediately exaggerated COVID’s true transmissibility and
virulence in order to generate panic among weak-minded Americans,
and then began to seize control of American institutions in BLUE areas

by using public health measures as their rationale. They soon mandated
masks, lockdowns of businesses in BLUE areas, and mandatory
vaccinations for public employees, air passengers, the military, and
employees of firms doing business with the federal government.

Perhaps the most egregious power seized by the NCPUSA was the
dubious authority to mass-mail ballots for the 2020 Presidential
Election in “swing states.” This produced untold millions of fraudulent
votes in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Minnesota, Pennsylvania and
Wisconsin. According to the documentary 2000 Mules, it reversed the
legitimate outcome of the election in each of those six states, and stole
the 2020 election from Donald Trump exactly as he complained.
By stealing the election from Trump, China and the NCPUSA rid
themselves of their greatest opposition and the primary impediment
to their further accumulation of power. RINOs doing the bidding of
their masters in the “donor class” were already lining up with the
NCPUSA to try to end Trump’s tariffs on Chinese imports. Stealing the
election from Trump also allowed the NCPUSA to dodge a bullet,
because eight years of Trump would probably have relegated
“Democrats” to the kind of obscurity enjoyed by the Flat Earth

Society. By stealing the election, all of Trump’s enemies won and only
the American People lost.
Anthony Fauci’s treasonous complicity in illegally funding the Chinese
military’s Virologic Warfare Program at the Wuhan Lab — with several
millions of dollars in grants over many years — was no longer of interest
to the NCPUSA after it gained a majority in both Houses of Congress
through its 2020 voter fraud. Fauci’s frequent commissions of perjury
before Congress were soon forgiven as well, and he would NEVER be
held accountable for helping to illegally fund COVID’s gain of function
research. Nor would he be held to account for the terrible advice he
intentionally gave President Trump in an attempt to sabotage Trump’s
presidency.
The WHO was once again free to continue its pursuit of one-world
government, just as it’s now doing with the International Treaty on
Pandemic Prevention and Preparedness. This treaty authorizes the
Director-General of the WHO — that Ethiopian communist who
repeatedly lied to the world about the ChinaVirus — to define what an
“international public health emergency” is, and override U.S. laws and
the Constitution in order to deal with such an event. By the way, the
WHO considers “climate change” and Third World poverty to be
“international public health emergencies.”

WHO Logo & Its Chinese Stooge Director

Several times on my favorite cable TV show, The First 48, veteran
homicide detectives have made the point that when you look closely at
the true culprit of a homicide, all the available evidence suddenly
begins to fit together neatly, like a puzzle. The same is rarely true of
any other suspect or “person-of-interest.” My theory — that China
unleashed the COVID pandemic to damage Trump’s re-election
prospects and end U.S. tariffs on Chinese exports to America — neatly
fits this puzzle analogy.
The only unresolved question in my mind is whether the NCPUSA
collaborated with China to help orchestrate the COVID pandemic.
Based on experience, my guess is that it did…

It Was Never About Hate

Posted on by

It Was Never About Hate

Category: Uncategorized | Tags:

CANADA: NOT STOLEN

Posted on by
Category: Uncategorized

The Reproduction Challenge

Posted on by

Indian Minister Offers 60-Million Indians to Canada: KEEP THEM IN INDIA AND “MAKE INDIA GREAT AGAIN”

Posted on by
Category: Uncategorized