Eva Vlaardingerbroek — What It Means to Be European & How We Must Save It

Posted on by

Eva Vlaardingerbroek — What It Means to Be European & How We Must Save It

How the Black Discount in Sentencing Works in Our Anti-White Courts

Posted on by

Justice Watch: Justice Frank Hoskins cuts Nigerian sex offender’s sentence after race and culture assessment

Omogbolahan “Teddy” Jegede was sentenced to two years in prison for sexually assaulting two women in 2022 and 2023.Sheila Gunn ReidSheila Gunn Reid   |   August 18, 2026   |   News   |   5 Comments Source: CBC and Nova Scotia Courts

Source: CBC and Nova Scotia Courts

A Nova Scotia judge sentenced a former university football player convicted of sexually assaulting two women to two years behind bars, explicitly stating the sentence would have been “much higher” without an assessment examining the offender’s race and cultural background.

On December 17, 2025, Nova Scotia Supreme Court Justice Frank Hoskins sentenced 25-year-old Omogbolahan “Teddy” Jegede following his conviction by a jury earlier in 2025 for sexually assaulting two women at St. Francis Xavier University.

The attacks occurred in university residences in Antigonish in 2022 and 2023, approximately five months apart, as reported by the National Post.

One victim testified that Jegede choked her nearly to the point of unconsciousness. The other was forced to perform oral sex while Jegede physically controlled her movements. Both women described being physically dominated by Jegede.

“It should be noted that but, for the contents of the [this doesn’t apply if you’re White or Oriental] and all the mitigating factors surrounding Omogbolahan (Teddy) Jegede, this sentence would have been much higher,” Hoskins said in his sentencing decision.

The Crown sought a sentence of up to three years, while Jegede’s defence asked for a conditional sentence that would have allowed him to serve his punishment in the community.

Hoskins rejected the defence request, saying incarceration was necessary to express society’s condemnation of the crimes.

He imposed 18 months for the more violent sexual assault and six months for the other, for a total of two years. Jegede was also given three years of probation.

Central to the sentencing was an Impact of Race and Culture Assessment (IRCA), which examined Jegede’s experiences as a black immigrant to Canada.

Jegede was born in Lagos, Nigeria, and moved to Canada with his family in 2010. His family initially lived in Brampton, Ontario, before moving to Fort McMurray, Alberta. The court heard that Jegede experienced bullying as a child because of his accent and race and later felt isolated as a black student attending university in Antigonish.

The IRCA also examined academic difficulties, mental-health struggles and an absence of adult mentors while Jegede attended university.

“The absence of adult mentors or role models further exacerbated Mr. Jegede’s vulnerability,” Hoskins said while quoting the assessment.

Hoskins said the IRCA provided “valuable insight” into Jegede’s background from a social and cultural perspective.

At the same time, the judge acknowledged the seriousness of the crimes and the fact there were two separate victims.

Hoskins said the two offences occurring in similar circumstances only five months apart suggested Jegede “may be dangerous.” He also identified the violence and invasive nature of the assaults as a primary aggravating factor.

Despite those findings, Hoskins suggested Jegede could be a candidate for early release.

“I think Mr. Jegede will be a really good candidate for probably early parole given everything I’ve read,” he said.

The use of IRCAs was expanded with federal funding under former prime minister Justin Trudeau’s government. In April 2021, then-justice minister David Lametti announced $6.64 million over five years, followed by $1.6 million annually, to support their implementation across Canada.

The Justice Department said the assessments are intended to help sentencing judges understand how factors including “poverty, marginalization, racism, and social exclusion” have affected an offender and their life experiences.

In Jegede’s case, Hoskins was explicit about the assessment’s effect on the punishment: without the IRCA, pre-sentence report and other mitigating factors, he said the prison sentence would have been “much higher.” (The Rebel, August 18, 2026)

How the Black Discount in Sentencing Works in Our Anti-White Courts

Justice Watch: Justice Frank Hoskins cuts Nigerian sex offender’s sentence after race and culture assessment

Omogbolahan “Teddy” Jegede was sentenced to two years in prison for sexually assaulting two women in 2022 and 2023.Sheila Gunn ReidSheila Gunn Reid   |   August 18, 2026   |   News   |   5 Comments Source: CBC and Nova Scotia Courts

Source: CBC and Nova Scotia Courts

Insights Into The Desmarais Clan’s Disturbing China Connexion

Posted on by

Insights Into The Desmarais Clan’s Disturbing China Connexion

Zhu Rongji Went Off Script Beside Chrétien and Desmarais to Call Canada China’s “Best Friend”—Then Beijing Omitted RecordThe Canadian diplomat who took notes at the 1998 dinner says Zhu’s “best friend” declaration was left out of Beijing’s published account, and that the eagle in his famous warning was not America.

Sam CooperAug 18 




OTTAWA — Chinese premier Zhu Rongji discarded a prepared speech at a 1998 dinner in Beijing and spontaneously declared Canada to be China’s “best friend” while seated directly between prime minister Jean Chrétien and Chrétien’s son-in-law, Power Corporation executive André Desmarais, according to the Canadian diplomat assigned to record Zhu’s remarks.But Zhu’s declaration did not appear in the account published by the Chinese Communist Party’s flagship newspaper, People’s Daily.Charles Burton, the veteran diplomat and China scholar who attended the dinner as an official note-taker, told The Bureau Tuesday that People’s Daily instead published Zhu’s unused prepared speech the following day. Its account also omitted Zhu’s off-the-cuff response to a Time magazine profile warning that his aggressive economic reforms had carried him dangerously close to the political sun.Burton disclosed the circumstances after reading Desmarais’s tribute to Zhu, published in La Presse and The Globe and Mail following Zhu’s death on August 12 at 97.Zhu’s death drew tributes from around the world to the technocrat who led China into the World Trade Organization and helped transform the country into the world’s factory. Desmarais’s tribute stands apart among them, both for its intimacy and for what it says about relations between Beijing, Ottawa and Washington.It is also illuminating for Canadians seeking to understand Ottawa’s long-standing approach to Communist China—and the influence of a Montreal corporate and political network that championed deeper engagement with Beijing.Desmarais describes Zhu as an uncle-like figure, mentor and intimate friend. Burton’s account provides a rare firsthand window into how the statement underpinning that narrative was actually delivered.“The text [of] Zhu’s upcoming dinner speech was placed at each table setting,” Burton recalled. “I got out a sharpened pencil to note if he left any of it out or added any asides.”“Then Zhu completely ignored the prepared text.”Burton was also struck by Zhu’s position at the table.André Desmarais was then head of the Canada China Business Council, Burton said. Jean Chrétien, the Canadian prime minister, was his father-in-law.The Chinese premier sat directly between them.“I am pretty sure that the CCP took the father-in-law/son-in-law [relationship] as a significant factor,” Burton wrote in comments to The Bureau.“I was a bit thrown to see Premier of the State Council Zhu dead centre between them.”The tableau compressed a powerful Canada–China network into a single seating arrangement: the Chinese premier, Canada’s head of government and a leading member of the Montreal corporate dynasty that had spent years developing commercial and political relationships with Beijing.Power Corporation was among the Canadian companies that founded the Canada China Business Council in 1978. Paul Desmarais served as its founding chairman. André Desmarais later led the organization and remains its honorary chairman.Desmarais also recalls Zhu warning in a speech that an eagle flying too close to the sun would burn and be reduced to ashes. Everyone present, Desmarais writes, understood the eagle to represent the United States, and Canada to be the steady partner on which China could rely.The anecdote casts America as the arrogant power destined to fall, while Canada emerges as Beijing’s trusted and dependable alternative. That interpretation has immediate resonance as Prime Minister Mark Carney holds last-minute talks with Washington to avert threatened 50 percent American tariffs.But Burton says there was no reference to the United States in Zhu’s remarks that night.The eagle was Zhu himself.Less than a month before Chrétien’s November 1998 visit, Time published a profile titled China’s Missing Pieces. It compared powerful men to Icarus and identified Zhu as China’s most daring “highflyer”—a reformer in danger of crashing under political resistance, unemployment and unrest.At the dinner, Burton said, Zhu jokingly rebutted that characterization. Seated between Chrétien and Desmarais, he suggested that the Canadian prime minister could see Zhu had neither burnt feathers nor the smell of roasted chicken.“The Icarus metaphor of ‘flying too close to the sun’ was famously applied to Zhu Rongji by Time magazine in October 1998,” Burton said.“There was no reference to the United States in Mr. Zhu’s remarks that night. None of his refuting of the Time Magazine piece or his Canada is best friend of China assertion made it into the official record,” Burton said.For Burton, the 1998 dinner was emblematic of something larger.“Zhu Rongji’s premiership marked the golden age of highly lucrative relationships between the Canadian Laurentian elite and Chinese Communist business networks,” he told The Bureau.Under Xi Jinping’s neo-Leninist redirection of China’s political economy, Burton added, a new mercantilism focused on domestic investment has taken hold, and Canadian industrialists are no longer the “valued partners and friends” they may have naively believed themselves to be 30 years ago.Nearly three decades after Burton saw Chrétien seated beside Zhu and Desmarais, the former prime minister was again in Beijing, The Bureau has reported.On the eve of Carney’s January 2026 visit, former Canadian diplomat Michael Kovrig drew attention to Chrétien’s private meeting with Chinese Vice-President Han Zheng only days before Carney’s arrival.Kovrig described Chrétien as a possible “warm-up act” for the official mission. He emphasized Chrétien’s close connections to Power Corporation and the CCBC and characterized the circumstances as a possible effort by “certain business interests to deepen trade and investment.”“Canadians should watch closely what sort of dealmaking follows,” Kovrig said, as reported by The Bureau.Brian Lee Crowley of the Macdonald-Laurier Institute has recounted an even blunter warning.Crowley said the late David Kilgour told him that, upon becoming minister of state for Asia-Pacific under Chrétien, Kilgour received a visit from a representative of the Prime Minister’s Office.“Our policy toward China, he was told in no uncertain terms, is set not at our foreign ministry or the PMO, but at the headquarters of Power Corporation in Montreal,” Crowley wrote.That is Crowley’s account of Kilgour’s recollection, but the relationships themselves are documented.

Chinese Professor Blasts LA “Zombie Apocalypse

Posted on by

Folks … I immensely admire this Chinese Man(Professor)  for speaking Truth to Power . No one else could get way with observing  the obvious  .

For those of us who occupy the bottom of the Western World’s CASTE system , because we are proud of our heritage , his take opens the door for  we White activists to proclaim our case for White group  determination and combatting antiWhiteism from the ruling class who live in their financial bubble oblivious to our sufferings .

Folk first …pass around the world to all of our friends.

https://nypost.com/2026/08/16/us-news/professor-jiang-xueqin-blasts-la-on-piers-morgan-show-apologizes-to-china/

Category: Uncategorized

You’re Fired, White Boy

Posted on by

You’re Fired, White Boy

Signature: bFIkEuO1dTH/EZQ3N/W8ojpvKXmyfILbHy8q1xC9Qw9B61412KwHWL9hTCuZcQvmYrbDTYy73/VEC5dh/2kwwVbBi7BabnKzJ9tzLRNDDBfREl2oawaML6qdrKaX3b2zxPOlJhXnM5TwAwC3EzaZw4JSuYBnS5m+EQdRbw1UpMZxFoanBy93HJvqMDm7rjRdCd4pd5Z3H+s4HlT399OtRAS0DWLA/msPvhG1kxOAR7lrnbAXbu8Tse+0hhRhdO1sPBxX0vsYeWdR061ZL17GalhDTg9a+d39ogSv4EP6G9+M4CUSL7Hq8c1yLFbPt1Gzl8aDXxsP9HUVumC4rWNcwm8zoo7eW6rw5EnhGuGwDfxmgsuiqYy1LOlYEnV3BzO7jQsL1tUMQGwfyctfOI6d9A==

I worked at Dairy Queen.
In January 2026 hot grease splashed into my eye on shift. There was no eyewash station. Not one. Something the law actually requires. I was off for about a month on WCB. When I came back I lasted maybe two weeks before they fired me. Before the injury there were zero complaints. After I returned they found a reason. Just like that.
The new owner is Indian. When he took over he cleaned house. Fired locals. Brought in his own people. One woman who had worked there for 30 years got the same treatment. Loyalty meant nothing. Experience meant nothing. Being Canadian meant nothing.
I still don’t have full vision in that eye. Never got it back. And the place that caused it treated me like I was disposable the second I became inconvenient.This picture hits differently when you’ve lived it. A young Canadian standing there while the whole counter is stacked with the same crowd that replaced the people who used to work there. This is the pattern. Locals get pushed out. The new group looks after its own. And the rest of us are supposed to stay quiet and keep buying the Blizzards.
I’m done. Enough is enough. If a business treats Canadians like second-class labour in their own country, they don’t deserve our money. Boycott the ones that do this. Support the ones that still hire and respect the people who actually built these communities.We are not the help. This is our country.Canada First.Enough is enough
Justin Harvey, Yarmouth, Nova Scotia

Canada Is Broken

Posted on by

Arrest Them: Free Speech Throttled to Enforce “Diversity”

Posted on by

`

Posted on by

What Replacement Means

Category: Uncategorized | Tags:

IT HAPPENED: EU approved RETURN REGULATION

Posted on by

IT HAPPENED: EU approved RETURN REGULATION

The European Parliament voted yes to the new EU Return Regulation

Peter Imanuelsen

Jun 19, 2026

row of european union flags
Photo by Guillaume Périgois on Unsplash

Very major news coming from Europe.

The European Parliament just voted YES and has now approved the new Return Regulation.

This is very big, and the left has been very upset that this law passed. But major political figures like Italian Prime Minister Georgia Meloni has supported this new regulation.

Some unusual scenes was seen in the EU parliament as the news was announced, with right-wing politicians shouting ”SEND THEM BACK” inside the parliament building.

Dominik Tarczyński MEP@D_Tarczynski

This is my victory today! We won! Send them back! BE LIKE POLAND.

12:55 PM · Jun 17, 2026 · 373K Views


604 Replies · 5.76K Reposts · 46.7K Likes

The vote passed with 418 votes in favor of the new law and 218 voting against it.

Centre-right parties in the EU parliament came together with the right-wing parties to approve this new regulation.

So what does this mean?

This new rules establishes a Common European System for Returns with the goal of simplifying, speeding up and making returns (deportations) more effective in the EU.Subscribe

People who don’t cooperate, are at risk of fleeing or people who pose a security risk can be detained to ensure effective deportation of the person.

Authorities will also be able to enter the place of residence to find migrants who have failed to comply with a return order and also seize their documents and phones.

Not only that, but searches of ”other relevant premises” will also be allowed, meaning that EU citizens who are suspected of sheltering migrants with a return order can also potentially have their homes raided by authorities.

Even NGO organisations suspected of sheltering migrants with a return order can be raided.

Such raid will however require prior authorization and must be linked to enforcing specific return orders.

Return hubs.

EU member countries can now arrange agreements with third countries outside the EU to setup return hubs, places where people issued with deportation can be transferred.

This is significant.

It means there will be facilities located outside the EU where people can be deported. Essentially, they will be deportation/processing centers.

These return hubs can only be setup in countries that respect human rights and international law. In other words, it must be safe.

Of course, this will likely be a deterrent from people wanting to migrate to the EU in the first place if they know there is a risk they will be deported to a deportation centers outside the EU.

Greece already has plans to have return hubs operational by 2027. They are already in talks with several countries in Africa which could be either used as transit points or longer term facilities.

Leftist politicians are very upset at these return hubs, comparing them and the possible home raids to ”Trump era” and ”ICE style” practices.

A standardized European Return Order will also be introduced, with return decisions being shared across the Schengen area, with member states being able to recognize and enforce return decisions issued by another member state.

This won’t be mandatory at first, but may become mandatory later on.

So, big changes are happening in the EU.

One could say that this is the beginning of remigration.

Media Coverup Of Foreigner Attack on Church

Posted on by

A Christian church in East York was attacked three times. Rocks through the windows, again and again.

Police say a man was finally caught in the act on the third occasion. He’s charged with three counts of mischief to religious property, and the hate-crime unit is investigating.

His name is Khaliq Hussain Anwar, 56.

Funny how the headlines managed to leave that part out. “A Toronto man.” That’s all you were supposed to know.

Imagine the coverage if the target had been any other house of worship.

He has not been convicted. But you deserve the full story not a sanitized version.

They’ll leave the name out every time. Ask yourself why. — Ezra Levant