Racism matters…unless the victim is white
Thank you for becoming a valued subscriber. Your support fuels the fight for freedom, sovereignty, and common-sense conservatism, You’re helping us to deliver unfiltered truth, bold ideas, and the real news they don’t want you to hear.
Racism matters…unless the victim is white.
The tragic death of Henry Nowak has become a test of whether Western societies truly believe in equality.
Short on time? Here is a 5 dot point summary of my thoughts.
- The muted reaction to Henry Nowak’s murder exposes a double standard in how racial incidents are treated when the victim is white.
- Were the police too quick to believe allegations against Henry because they assumed the white person was the likely offender.
- I contrast the global response to George Floyd’s death with the comparatively limited attention given to Henry Nowak’s case.
- Has DEI ideology contributed to a culture in which concerns affecting white men are increasingly dismissed or ignored?
- True equality requires opposing racism consistently, regardless of the race of either the victim or the perpetrator.
What’s a white life worth? Not much if you judge by the muted reaction to the stabbing murder of teenager Henry Nowak in the United Kingdom.
For years politicians, activists, corporations and media organisations have insisted that racism must be confronted wherever it appears.
Yet the reaction to the horrific death of this 18 year old has demonstrated in the starkest terms that racism against white people is considered a lesser form of discrimination.
Henry was stabbed with a 21 centimetre ceremonial sword wielded by an Indian Sikh man who then phoned police claiming the teenager had “racially attacked” him.
Henry lay drowning in his own blood, handcuffed and denied treatment by police who were only too ready to believe that the white person must have been the offender.
“I’ve been stabbed,” the teenager garbled to police as he lay handcuffed in the dirt, blood filling his lungs.
A police officer replied: “I don’t think you have mate.”
Three minutes passed before police finally paid enough attention to realise, too late to save his life, that Henry Nowak had indeed been stabbed.
The killer had already disposed of the murder weapon with the assistance of his mother, who removed it from the scene, and played the race card.
“I’ve been racially attacked by a white guy.” The killer said.
Police, long conditioned to believe that racism can only flow in one direction and that white people are inherently suspect were only too willing to believe the lie.
And now Henry Nowak is dead.
You would think the case would cause outrage.
Across the Atlantic, when George Floyd died in police custody, there were riots in the streets. Not just in American streets. There were protests and demonstrations across the Western world, entire city blocks burned.
Even UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer took a knee for George Floyd. Yet Starmer only commented on Henry Nowak’s murder after media outlets, Elon Musk and people like me began highlighting not just his silence but the legacy media and the Left.
The Prime Minister eventually released a statement expressing his condolences and concern. He said “…we must end the cycle of tragedy by tackling the horror of knife crime…”
Let’s conduct a thought experiment.
Imagine the roles were reversed.
Imagine Henry Nowak was an immigrant. Perhaps a young Pakistani man.
Imagine the outrage.
Imagine the headlines.
Imagine the speeches from political leaders.
Imagine how London would be burning right now.
The British Prime Minister would have addressed the nation and promised to do everything in his power to eradicate racism and bigotry.
But Henry Nowak was not black, he was not brown, he was white and white doesn’t count, or at least it doesn’t count as much.
I am not arguing that George Floyd received too much attention, that is a separate debate. My criticism is that Henry Nowak appears to have received too little.
If political leaders were willing to kneel for George Floyd why is there no comparable national reflection for a white teenager murdered in circumstances that raise serious questions about racial hostility?
In much of the Western world white men have become society’s acceptable target.
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs were originally sold as a means of ensuring equal opportunity.
But increasingly these initiatives strip men (especially white men) of their individuality and reduce them to representatives of a supposedly privileged class whose concerns can be safely ignored.
Institutions that boast about opposing discrimination now seem remarkably selective when deciding which forms of discrimination deserve attention.
And perhaps the greatest irony of all is that many of these Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs are championed by white women who increasingly view white men not as individuals, but as members of a privileged class whose concerns can be safely dismissed.
A black man is murdered? Outrage. It’s racism.
And even if the killer was black, someone, somewhere, will insist that systemic racism was the real culprit.
But if a white man is murdered? Meh. Move along. Nothing to see here.
That is why the Henry Nowak case resonates far beyond a single tragic murder.
For many people it represents a test of whether Western societies genuinely believe in equal treatment or merely equal treatment for some groups.
People are tired of being told that racism is a national emergency one day and an inconvenient topic the next.
If racism is wrong, then it is wrong regardless of who commits it and regardless of who suffers from it.
That principle should not change according to the identity of the victim.
All I want is equality. No matter the colour of your skin.
Is that asking too much?
Senator Ralph Babet, Senator for Victoria, United Australia Party.
Senator Babet is an Australian Federal Senator, a committed advocate for freedom, and an unapologetic voice for common-sense conservatism. He is a passionate defender of Australian sovereignty, traditional values, and the right to speak the truth – no matter how unpopular it may be in the mainstream media or political establishment.
Senator Babet created Let’s Talk About It as a platform to deliver unfiltered truth, bold ideas, and the real news they don’t want you to know – without censorship, spin, or corporate interference.
“In an age of manufactured consent and media manipulation, telling the truth is an act of rebellion. Let’s Talk About It exists to inform, empower, and rally Australians who still believe in freedom, faith, and our way of life.”
— Senator Babet
Canadians Face 18 Month Wait for Hip Replacement While Illegals Go to the Head of the Line: $772M FOR ASYLUM SEEKERS’ HEALTH CARE
A big portion goes to ‘failed refugee claimants’: PBO
Canada spent more than $722 million providing extensive health care to tens of thousands of asylum seekers in the last fiscal year, including a considerable portion on “failed refugee claimants” who are either languishing in the system or avoiding removal orders, according to a new report from the Parliamentary Budget Office.
The review of the Interim Federal Health Program (IFHP) also found that its costs continue to climb because of “backlogs” in Canada’s asylum system that keep claimants waiting, in some cases for up to three years.
The IFHP was created to provide limited and temporary health-care coverage to foreign nationals deemed vulnerable and disadvantaged.
Conservative health critic Dan Mazier and immigration critic Michelle Rempel Garner said the report shows that the Liberals’ temporary program “has turned into a multi-year, taxpayer-funded entitlement where tens of thousands of bogus asylum claimants are provided health benefits that Canadians are not eligible for.
“The Liberals must explain to Canadians why asylum seekers who have had their refugee claims rejected, are facing enforceable removal orders, and in some cases fail to appear for removal, continue to receive deluxe, taxpayer-funded health benefits while they avoid leaving Canada,” they said in a statement.
The total spending across all health care categories and beneficiary groups for 202425 was closer to $822 million when resettled refugees are accounted for. Unlike those seeking asylum, they “are selected and assessed abroad, with admission targets set in the Government’s Immigration Levels Plan, resulting in relatively predictable intake and processing timelines.”
The PBO noted that whereas asylum seekers claimed an average of $724 per beneficiary per year on basic care — doctor visits, hospital care, ambulances, labs, diagnostic testing and immigration medical examinations — resettled refugees averaged $97. They’re also typically off IFHP within three months and no longer than a year.
Per-person spending on basic care has increased consistently, PBO found, but spending on supplementary health products and services — urgent dental treatment, prescription drug coverage, vision care, counselling services, assistive devices and others — has grown at a much faster rate.
In 2019-20, Canada spent $94 million on supplementary benefits across all groups. By 2023-24, expenses nearly tripled to $285 million and they reached $457 million in 202425.
Two categories in particular accounted for 80 per cent of the spending: prescription drugs and urgent dental care.
The latter represents 56 per cent of program expenses.
According to PBO, the number of dental claims exploded by 43 per cent between 2019 and 2025 (240,000 to 1.4 million). Combined with a higher average cost per claim, it drove dental costs from $30 million to $257 million over that time.
PBO also found that spending on counselling services increased from less than one per cent of total supplementary spending in 2016 to 11 per cent in 2025. In 2024-25, the bill came in at $38.7 million.
“These are benefits that Canadians who have paid into the system their entire lives can’t access,” Mazier said on X.
And while those rising expenses are increasing the overall cost of the IFHP, “elevated intakes” and the resulting “persistent backlogs” are also major drivers.
Officials who managed 64,150 asylum claims in 2019 had more than 173,000 in 2024.
In line with the new Liberal government’s immigration policies, that number decreased to just over 100,000 in 2025.
“As of December 2025, over 300,000 asylum claims were pending adjudication and roughly 65 per cent of these pending claims have been in the system for longer than a year,” PBO wrote.
“This represents a five-fold increase since 2021 and is anticipated to increase in the near-term due to an influx of claims made between 2023 and 2025.”
At present, almost half (47 per cent) of the claimants have been in the system between one and two years, but the PBO estimates that the number waiting between two and three years “will notably rise by 2026-27, reflecting elevated past intake and constrained exit rates.”
And considering the backlog, PBO calculates that each additional month in processing time could drive the program costs up by $72 million in the upcoming fiscal year.
To attain asylum refugee status in Canada, applicants must pass through several layers of review and have several avenues to appeal if rejected. For instance, 79 per cent of claimants rejected by the Immigration Refugee Board filed at least one appeal, during which time they are still eligible for IFHP.
So, too, are the “nearly 74,000 failed refugee claimants” among the CBSA’S removals inventory, which consists of 23,429 people whose removals are in process and 27,797 who failed to show up for removal and are being sought by border authorities.
“It is undeniable that as the backlog grows, rejected asylum claimants continue adding pressure to a health care system where Canadians are already facing long wait times for care,” Mazier wrote on X.
It should be noted that CBSA removals have increased, climbing from 5,714 in 2021 to 19,579 last year.(National Post, May 27, 2026)\
53 Dead In America’s April Black-On-White Holocaust
Where are the feminists on Black Significant Other femicide?
Meaghan Bowler came all the way from Australia to marry Jesse Jones. He stabbed her multiple times
Kenn Gividen’s computer broke down recently (before VDARE.com’s mugging by NYAG Letitia James, we would simply have bought him a new one), so his April 2026 roundup of America’s ongoing black-on-white homicide Holocaust™ wasn’t published until May 21. Which means his May 2026 survey will appear next week—he’s relentless.
PeterBrimelow.com is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
But then, so is America’s black-on-white Holocaust™.
Before VDARE.com was mugged by Letitia James, we used to report Kenn’s roundup of black-on-white homicides under the running head “A Month In The Death Of White America”—example here. It was one of our most popular features. Maybe that’s why James mugged us. But thanks to her lawfare, VDARE.com can no longer pay Kenn. So I urge you subscribe to his substack AbateHate.com—it covers a lot more than black crime— here!
Since the mugging of VDARE.com, I have begun to analyze Kenn’s results separately from his own roundup e.g. my March analysis here. My analysis usually differs somewhat from Kenn’s, partly because of subsequent developments e.g. I’ve found a couple more immigrants this month; and partly because of methodology. Thus I include all of the black-on-white homicides that Kenn discovers in any given month, whereas in May he broke out the older killings that he had found separately (and there are generally a lot of them, only slowly surfacing). So he reports an April total of 43; my total is 53.
My philosophy: it all come out in the wash. Kenn reports Grok says there are 40-50 black-on-white homicides each month, comporting with FBI figures, which means he always misses 10-20. But the intense Regime Media suppression of Politically Incorrect racial hate facts sometimes lessens after the initial furor, e.g. in trials that no-one is monitoring.
Except for us.
The other difference between Kenn and myself: I look for overall themes in the American black-on-white Holocaust™, whereas he lets the appalling truth just speak for itself.
Not for the first time, the theme that leaps out from the April data:
- The absolutely extraordinary number of white women regularly killed by Black Significant Others (here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here).
Thus my featured image, above,
is of Meaghan Bowler, who came all the way from Australia to marry Jesse Nichols Jones, also pictured, who then proceeded to stab her multiple times (this is a recurrent aspect of Black Significant Other killings) despite having two children with her.
In other words, even apparently stable Black Significant Other relationships can end in savage homicide.
In contrast, it is vanishingly rare to see the opposite: black women killed by White Significant Others. Kenn found no examples at all in April.
- A related theme: Black Significant Other Collateral Damage, e.g, a white brother trying to protect his sister from a black ex-boyfriend (examples here, here).
To put Black Significant Other killings in perspective: in the 1970s, feminist scholars began whooping up the concept of “femicide,” the killing of women. They never agreed whether this meant all killings of women, or just killings of women for being women. But where is the discussion of Black Significant Other femicide of White domestic partners?
- And if “femicide” does mean the apparently-motiveless black killing of white women, April examples are here, here, here.
Where are the feminist scholars on this?
Other consistent themes:
- Crossfire. Innocent whites die in crossfire between black shooters every month, here, here, here, here.
- White deaths in robberies, here, here, here, here.
- White deaths in illegal drug transactions (bad idea!), here, here.
- Black impulsivity here, here, here.
- Black stupidity as in how could he have possibly expected to get away with this? Here
- Vehicular homicide. Kenn includes these, although it bothers liberal me because they could be genuine accidents. But some of these are indeed plainly criminally reckless here, here,
- Home invasion here.
- Immigrant/ immigrant stock homicides. The Regime Media represses the immigration status of criminals even more sternly than their race. But the recent surge of immigrants is so great that it can be detected because some don’t even have Americanized names— here, here, here, here.
Kenn counted just five white-on-black homicides in April. Obviously this is tellingly disproportionate, given that the white population is (still) so much larger than the black.
One white-on-black homicide was a road rage incident in which the perp has a typically Puerto Rican/ Ashkenazi Jewish name. Another appears to be a confrontation between white and black teenagers.
But we don’t know the details—because local media coverage has ignominiously collapsed, often relying entirely on law enforcement press releases.
This is particularly unfortunate because local media would often report race when the national media was working hard to repress it. But no more.
So please send Kenn Gividen tips by DMing him on his substack Chat, or email him at Abatehate@usa.com.
A doctor/ engineer is culturally enriching a sidewalk in Sydney, Australia. Immigration & Multiculturalism has FAILED. We cannot coexist with uncivilized foreign people that poop everywhere
Traitor Mark Carney Apologizes for the Komagata Maru: No Apology Needed: These Sikh Illegals Deserved Deportation
May 23 was the 112th anniversary of the expulsion of the Komagata Maru, a Japanese ship commissioned by Sikh radicals in Vancouver to sneak about 376 of their countrymen into Canada. A determined Dominion government, largely relying on information from immigration officer William Hopkinson, eventually declared the invaders unwelcome and sent them packing. Sikh radicals over the past few decades have sold a false tale and successive politicians — Harper, Trudeau and now Carney — have apologized. The Sikhs have collected grovelling apologies and lots of money. The government even helped fund a recent film glorifying Mewa Singh the radical Sikh who assassinated William Hopkinson in the summer of 1914.
Hopkinson is a real Canadian hero. No apology needed.
Here is Mark Carney’s shameful apology: ” The Komagata Maru tragedy is one of the darkest chapters in our history — a moment where Canada failed to uphold our values, with horrific consequences. Today, we honour the memory of all the passengers, their descendants, and their communities who suffered.” The only one who suffered was William Hopkinson, a gifted linguist and undercover agent, who was assassinated and Hopkinson’s widow and two young daughters.Great video by Harrison Faulkner on the Komagata Maru. .
https://x.com/i/status/2058312402886959525
Here’s a broadcast I did on the Komagata Maru 18 years ago.
https://youtu.be/8Fu9l-h1SBY?si=7wwztNeMwyK6yv1-Paul FrommDirector Canada First Immigration Reform Committee
William Hopkinson, a real Canadian Hero.
Hands Off Our Heritage Rally in Hamilton
Today we rallied in Gage Park (Hamilton, ON) where radical activists tore down a statue of Sir John A Macdonald back in 2021.
Canadians will no longer stand idly by while out of touch elites and radical activists tear down our monuments, rename our institutions and rewrite our history.
We’re getting organized, we’re getting active, and we will take our country back
Nathaniel-Erskine Smith: He Chose Moslems Over Traditional Canadians: The Moslems Chose One of Their Own Over Him — Serves Him Right
East End Toronto MP, Nathaniel Erskine-Smith has bowed and scraped to Moslems for years. An X post shows him in various Moslem garb explaining how he backed an anti-free speech bill on Islamophobia. “For over a decade, I’ve shown up for the Muslim community not just at election time, but in Ottawa. I’m running to bring that same advocacy to Queen’s Park.” Nathaniel Erskine-Smith
He was seeking the Liberal nomination in the provincial by-election in Scarborough South-west. He’s trying to lay the ground work for a run at the Provincial Liberal Leadership. A Moslem Bangladeshi pizza chain owner in good with the pooh bahs of the Provincial Liberal Party beat an angry Erskine-Smith by 19 votes. He’s crying foul. Apparently, many voters had no ID — an epidemic of forgetting them at home. Many took pictures of their ballots on their cellphones — suggesting pay for votes. Well, Nathaniel or “Nate” or would-be-Mohammed, that’s politics Third World style, which you and your treacherous party imported into Canada. SERVES YOU RIGHT!
That’s Erskine-Smith the dude in the blue, a real man of the people, just not OUR people. Well, he threw is his lot with them, and they threw this scalawag out!
That’s Erskine-Smith the dude in the blue, a real man of the people, just not OUR people. Well, he threw is his lot with them, and they threw this scalawag out!