Tag Archives: Jagmeet Singh

THE CONTROVERSY OVER CHRISTIAN HERITAGE MONTH

Posted on by

Christian Heritage Month Is True “Social Equity”–The Liberals Hate That

To enact Christian Heritage Month would be an exercise in authentic social equity. The rulers of “post-modern” Canada want nothing of the sort.

Share

“More than 25 Canadian cities so far have signed a proclamation declaring the entire month of December as Christian Heritage Month, calling for provinces to do the same.”

An article published this week by Western Standard News speaks to a growing demand for an establishment of heritage status for the Christian faith in Canada.

“Municipalities include Okotoks and Red Deer in Alberta, Prince George and Whistler in BC, Regina and Saskatoon in Saskatchewan, and more than 15 Ontario cities and regions, such as Ajax, Durham, Niagara Falls, Ottawa, Sudbury and Mississauga.” 

Canada is a country awash in government-endorsed heritage month designations. An effective drill-down on the subject calls for a definition of word “heritage.”

According to Vocabulary.com, “heritage can refer to practices or characteristics that are passed down through the years, from one generation to the next.”

“Researching your family tree would help you gain a sense of your personal heritage. Heritage is often used to discuss a cultural aspect or tradition that has been passed down through generations.”

Although dropping like a bomb relative to the rise of 3rd World-derived religions, a little over half of our population define themselves as “practising Christians.” Christianity is the most adhered-to religion in Canada, with 19,373,330 Canadians, or 53.3%, identifying themselves as of the 2021 census.

In terms of national heritage, the Christian-European influence permeates nearly every aspect of the foundation of Canadian society.

“The first official settlement of Canada was Québec, founded by Samuel de Champlain in 1608. The other four colonies within New France were Hudson’s Bay to the north, Acadia and Newfoundland to the east, and Louisiana far to the south. Canada became the most developed of the five colonies of New France.“

Cultural Action Party [est 2016] find it fascinating how, in terms of the woke assault on the colonial foundation of our country, the “French First” element is perpetually omitted. Due to Liberal government bias, the common perception is that Anglophones are at fault for the hardship experienced by our First Nations communities.

Be that as it may, the core elements of Canadian society largely derive from England. Parliamentary structure, legal and court systems, democracy, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, et al. All of which add credence to the concept of a government-sanctioned Christian Heritage Month in Canada.

“Conservative MP Introduces Bill To Declare December Christian Heritage Month”

December, 2023: “Bill C-369, The Christian Heritage Month Act, is unlikely to be debated or come up for a vote.”

MP Marilyn Gladu noted that “members of other faiths in Canada, including Hindus, Sikhs, Muslims and Jews, have their own heritage months.”

You can say that again. In fact, the designations range from the sublime to the ridiculous:

Sikh Heritage Month, Islamic History Month, Tamil Heritage Month, Lebanese Heritage Month, Filipino Heritage Month, Hindu Heritage Month are the rainbow-coloured flavour of the day in Canada.

According to a 2016 census, 219,555 Canadians claimed Lebanese ancestry. A 2021 census informs us that just under 20 million citizens of our country adhere to the Christian faith.

The  response to MP Gladu’s proposition was swift and direct: “forget about it,” opined the Liberal caucus. The bill didn’t even make it past the first reading.

According to CBC News, “the bill lands as the Conservatives press a petition campaign against a Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) paper that described statutory holidays marking Christian religious dates as discriminatory.“

How’s that for a kick-in-the-face via the Liberal government of Canada? By now, concerned citizens are accustomed to such behaviours. Our PM’s tenure coincides with the most extreme animus toward a religious community in modern Canadian history.

The bill flopped, not only by way of Trudeau’s Liberals, but with a healthy dose of hatred for the idea from leader Jagmeet Singh’s New Democratic Party. Charlie Angus, caucus leader of the New Democratic Party (NDP) would have none of it.

Bringing the conversation to its base-line as it relates to social equality in Canada: “social equity,” and its myriad vicissitudes. It’s a piece of wokeness which exists at the core of Liberal government ideology. Foundational to the woke academic movement; ubiquitous among mainstream media publications.

Too bad it doesn’t actually exist. If social equity was authentically applied, Christian Heritage Month would have been-in-the-bag decades ago.

“From a population of fewer than 150 in 1983, Tamils form an increasing share of the overall Canadian population. As per the 2021 Canadian census, Tamil Canadians number approximately 240,000 and account for roughly 0.7% of Canada’s population.”

“Your[Tamil Canadians] contributions to this country are extraordinary,” stated PM Trudeau on the coveted day of Tamil Heritage Month.

In contrast, Justin Trudeau speaks of Canada’s European-derived heritage:

“We have consistently marginalized, engaged in colonial behaviours, in destructive behaviours, in assimilationist behaviours, that have left a legacy of challenges to a large portion of the people who live in Canada.”

Love you to, Justin. In these dynamics we discover the nature of the woke beast that is the Liberal government of Canada. They detest our national heritage, maintain wicked animus toward Canada’s European-Christian-Anglophone heritage, while at the same time heaping praise on Tamil and Lebanese communities.

What up with all of this, anyway? CBC certainly aren’t going to tell you. Nor CTV, Globe & Mail, Toronto Star or any other legacy media publication. Therefore, one is left to draw their own conclusion, like this:

The Trudeau government are not here to “manage” our country. They exist to transform Canada. What’s the take-away message from Trudeau’s inversion of community priority? The dynamics are nothing short of an exercise in absurdity. Yet, on and on it goes.

The Liberals don’t want it, and you can bet your bottom rubie NDP leader Jagmeet Singh concurs. To do so would be an exercise in authentic social equity. The rulers of “post-modern” Canada want nothing of the sort.

In terms of federal government support for an official designation of Christian Heritage Month, it will be a cold-day-in-hell when our prime minister and his crew of neo-communists give this one the thumbs up.

Category: Uncategorized | Tags: , , , ,

Immigration Policy Is The Root Cause Of Foreign Election Interference In Canada

Posted on by

Immigration Policy Is The Root Cause Of Foreign Election Interference In Canada

Fascinating it is to note the “missing link” in all of this– the degree to which government and media sublimate the number one cause of foreign interference.

e

Many will be familiar with the term the “elephant in the room.” With this in mind, we consider the nature of governmental response to accusations of Canadian foreign election interference.

On the hot seat this week is Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who offered the following comment while being interviewed at the Foreign Election Interference Inquiry:

“These were covert, clandestine, and coercive measures—ranging from threats to withhold family visas, to paying sources for information. These actions represented a serious threat to public safety,” said Trudeau.

In this statement is found the key to the political “escape root” backroom Liberal government strategists are applying to the scandal. The “victims” are members of Canada’s diaspora communities– as opposed to citizens within general society.

Immigrants, refugees, and 3rd world ethnic communities. Eschewed in the narrative is the impact on “the rest of us.” By now, we know the type– “second rate” citizens who form the core of those who oppose PM Trudeau’s brand of globalist politics: Old Stock Canadians, multi-generational citizens, Anglophones, Christians and others of this ilk.

Fascinating it is to note a “missing link” in all of this. Namely, the degree to which government and media sublimate the number one cause of foreign interference.

Immigration policy is the one. As incredible as it seems, no one within Canada’s monolithic media conglomerate has pointed to a tangible truth: mass immigration from China, South Asia and the Middle East is the root source for the undermining of democratic governance in our country.

“Representatives of a B.C. Sikh temple whose president was shot dead last year, as well as the Sikh separatist group he was involved in, say their communities won’t feel safe until India’s consulates in Vancouver and Toronto are shut down.”

Gurkeerat Singh, spokesperson for the gurdwara, stated that “the safety and the security of Sikhs will still be in question unless India’s consulates are shut down.”

Right, The safety of the Sikhs, who at present comprise two percent of Canada’s total population. Holy Cow, these people sure make a lot of noise relative to demographic representation. But hey– that’s so-called “Multiculturalism” for ya.

A recent article from Policy Options shed light on the grief experienced by Chinese-Canadians as result of alleged election interference:

“These stories illustrate the CCP’s direct influence on diaspora communities, making these groups a target for foreign interference efforts. The CCP and China are not alone in conducting interference campaigns in Canada through disinformation campaigns, which have a significant and negative impact on the people who make up diaspora communities in Canada.”

These people may suffer, but does it really compare to the damage being inflicted on general society? The by-products of Liberal immigration policy affect all Canadians, not just government-coddled and coveted 3rd world diaspora peoples.

When media sublimate the high-level damage, they are freed from pointing to another obvious outcome of institutionalized Multiculturalism, diversity and the rest of the woke jive.

The missing link being the relationship between diaspora communities, and members of Parliament they vote into office. While myriad reports speak of the degree that culprits exist within the Liberal Party, our PM delivers the globalist goods:

“Trudeau addressed three memos starting in 2019 that intended to brief him on foreign interference threats, all of which he claimed never reached his desk.”

“I have faith, having looked at the paper, that it was indeed the right decision by the National Security Intelligence Advisor—that it wasn’t a document that significantly added in a relevant way to my understanding of the situation.”

Let Cultural Action Party [est. 2016] state it for the record: if Mr. Trudeau wanted to know details on federal election interference, he could have. The volume of CSIS intelligence output makes it near-impossible for our PM not to be aware of the phenomenon in any capacity.

Therefore, as far as the Liberal Party is concerned, Trudeau functions as a brick-wall of information-gathering. As opposed to that which he was willing to expose in this week’s proceedings:

As reported by journalist Sam Cooper of The Bureau:

“Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has testified on his view of two explosive Canadian intelligence reports, including the ‘Targeting Paper,’ which described how Chinese diplomats assessed Canadian MPs based on how helpful or hurtful they could be to Beijing.”

“Trudeau confirmed that this report was not shared with him by his key security advisor, Jody Thomas.”

A big, fat zero. Trudeau is functioning as a brick-wall of information-gathering prevention. As opposed to what he was willing to expose in this week’s proceedings:

“I have the names of a number of parliamentarians, former parliamentarians and-or candidates in the Conservative Party of Canada who are engaged (in) or at high risk of or for whom there is clear intelligence around foreign interference,” Trudeau said.

So Trudeau knows nothing about any of this except the identity of Conservative turn-coats.

“Global News reported that its intelligence sources with knowledge of CSIS affairs reported that [Liberal MP candidate Han] Dong was an alleged witting affiliate in China’s election interference networks.”

“Sources state that Trudeau and senior Liberal party officials ignored CSIS warnings about Dong, which has been denied by Trudeau.”

In 2021, the PM issued the following public statement:  “I do not have any information, nor have I been briefed on any federal candidates receiving any money from China.”

Yet, he has the “dope” on Conservative MPs.

 “Anonymous sources who spoke to Global News “described years of interactive dialogue between senior intelligence officials and Trudeau’s office regarding China’s incursions into Canadian elections.”

Never say die. Unconscionable as the day is long, it’s obvious Justin Trudeau will never come clean with the people of Canada.

In turn, media toe the party line. Mass immigration is the source of scandal; the fall-out being a degeneration of democracy in “post-modern” Canadian society.

Ie source of scandal; the fall-out being a degeneration of democracy in “post-modern” Canadian society.

Category: Uncategorized | Tags: , , ,

“Racialized” Candidates Power Provincial Election In British Columbia

Posted on by

“Racialized” Candidates Power Provincial Election In British Columbia

Media refuse to expose the relationship between immigration policy and rising political power being accumulated by Canada’s “special interest” communities.

Brad SalzbergSep 23

Share

For those concerned with a morphing of Canadian society toward “post-modern” status, a particular phenomenon remains worthy of public exposure.

It goes like this: when “special interest” communities experience incidents of so-called racism, media scream it to the high-heavens. Conversely, in cases of socio-political accomplishment, we hear nothing but a cacophony of silence.

Take, for example, the Liberal government-3rd World political powerhouse in the Greater Toronto Area. This geographic area can accurately be described as “Third World” central. In this regard, the key to the Liberal Party domination in ridings such as Brampton, Ontario remain poorly understood among Canadian society.

Within these ridings, demographics and political power go hand-in-hand. Brampton is a white-minority riding. Of its five members of Parliament, four are Sikh-Canadian and the other Muslim-Canadian.

Those interested in the “changing face” of Canadian society should be aware of these circumstances. Due to media sublimation, most of us don’t have a clue regarding the extent of ethnocentricity employed by election strategists.

Who more than government understand Canadian demography as shaped through immigration intake? Applied for decades, the formula runs like this: analyze a riding’s ethnic identity; match MP candidates with the dominant ethnicity.

As millions of 3rd world migrants arrive in Canada, the phenomenon filters down to a provincial level. Take, for example, the upcoming election in British Columbia. A quick analysis of candidate identity tells the story.

B.C. contains 93 provincial ridings. In total, 31 Sikh-Canadians are registered as MLA candidates, most of whom are running for the New Democratic Party. Where the rubber hits the ethnocentric road is found in 11 ridings in particular. Most are urban, with the phenomenon now spreading suburban and rural constituencies.

Burnaby-Centre, Burnaby-South, Delta-North, Richmond-Centre, Richmond-Bridgeport, Richmond-Queensborough, Surrey City Centre, Surrey-North, Surrey-Fleetwood, Surrey-Newton, Surrey-Panorama, Vancouver-Fraserview, Vancouver-Hastings. 

What do these provincial ridings have in common? No white candidates– that’s what. In our mind, CAP can now hear the accusations of “racism” begin to roll. But is it really the case?

Is it not a matter of exposing what legacy media neglect to place in front of the eyes of Canadians? And that reasons why are to be found in potential accusations of racism toward media? This information is factual, not conjecture. In this, we see how our country is being held hostage by the mighty “race-card.” Our eyes open to the idea that this dynamic is leading to comprehensive social inversion in Canada.

Media refrain from speaking of the trajectory of demographic identity rooted in immigration policy. Immigration is power. It’s the lifeblood by which “Old Stock” Canadians are to transition to a minority community as we stumble our way toward the half-century mark in 2050.

The riding of Vancouver-Hastings is a solo affair. Elections B.C. list a single candidate, current provincial NDP Attorney General Niki Sharma. In Langley-Highlands, incumbent NDP Minister of Housing Ravi Kahlon is all-but certain to retain his seat. Surrey-North NDP MLA Rachna Singh, Minister of Education, is a controversial figure, so much so that members of her own community have attempted to remove her from office based on her LGBT affectations:

“An attempt to recall British Columbia’s education minister has failed. The attempt, filed by Gurdeep Jassal, had to collect signatures from more than 40 per cent of eligible voters (11,811 signatures) in Rachna Singh’s Surrey-Green Timbers riding by Jan. 29, 2024.”

Additional members of the Executive include Jagrup Brar, Minister of Trade; Harry Bains, Minister of Labour. All told, Sikh-Canadians comprise 20% of  executive members of the NDP government in British Columbia. An interesting fact, seeing as the Sikh community population of B.C. was 290,870 as of April 2024. In 2019, the population of British Columbia was just over 5 million. The math informs us that 5.9% of the provincial population is Sikh.

What does this tell us? Cultural Action Party [est.2016] pull no punches. Sikh-Canadian politicians are over-represented in British Columbia. Why do we harp on this?

The reason why is found in the perpetual narrative from Canada’s woke contingent which demands “proportional representation” according to demographic make-up. The “multiculturalists” love this one, leveraging Canada’s changing demography to advance their ethnocentric interests.

Yet, when over-representation rules the roost, Canadians hear nothing about it. In this, we come to understand how the prickly issue of “racism” is being used by government and media to control Canadian society.

Shafted in the entire procedure are Canada’s multi-generational “Old Stock” Anglophone communities. The more immigration, the faster our country transitions to the “stuff of globalist dreams.”

With federal New Democratic Party leader Jagmeet Singh playing back-up quarterback, the entire circumstance is devoid of media exposure. Obviously, they want what Trudeau and Singh want.

The election in B.C. also includes a dozen candidates drawn from Chinese-Muslim communities. Caught in the crossfire are Canada’s “silent majority,” held captive by political correctness and additional elements of socio-political control falling under the under the umbrella of “liberalism.”

Filtering down to the provincial level in British Columbia and Ontario, it’s only a matter of time before our entire nation is reconfigured through immigration policy and its socio-political manifestations.

Category: Uncategorized | Tags: , , , , , , ,

Terry Glavin: A user’s guide to Trudeau’s illicit affair with China’s Communists

Posted on by

Terry Glavin: A user’s guide to Trudeau’s illicit affair with China’s Communists

There is no vindication awaiting the prime minister

Author of the article:

Terry Glavin

Published Jun 19, 2024  •  Last updated 5 days ago  •  5 minute read

231 Comments

Trudeau
Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau attends the plenary session of the Summit on peace in Ukraine, at the luxury Burgenstock resort, near Lucerne, on June 15, 2024. (Photo by URS FLUEELER / POOL / AFP)

Article content

In the ordinary course of heated political controversies, Canadians can sort out the issue that’s launching their politicians at one another’s throats. In the “foreign interference” upheaval that has in turns paralyzed, confounded and outraged Canada’s political class in recent days, we’re not even allowed to know what the federal party leaders are arguing about, exactly.

This doesn’t make the story easy to tell. It was already hard enough to determine when the story really begins, let alone figure how it will all end.

If we wanted to, we could push the beginning of the story back to 2003, when Beijing’s United Front Work Department boasted about electing six of its preferred candidates in Toronto. Three years later, the UFWD — China’s overseas strong-arming, “elite capture” and election-interference infrastructure — claimed electoral success for 10 of its 44 preferred Toronto-area candidates, according to an internal training manual uncovered by the Financial Times.

We could also begin the story with the way then Canadian Security Intelligence Service director Richard Fadden was thrown under the bus by Liberal and New Democratic Party MPs back in 2010, when he said several provincial and municipal politicians in Canada had come under Beijing’s influence, to a worrying degree. The charge against Fadden back then was led by the Liberals’ current health minister, Mark Holland.

But for the opening of this latest chapter, foreshadowed by a series of leaks from intelligence-agency whistleblowers going back to November 2022, we need only go back as far as June 3. That’s when an extraparliamentary oversight committee released a heavily-redacted, 84-page report that seemed to suggest that some MPs have been dallying in conduct bordering on treason.

In this way, the “foreign interference” story has revealed itself to be about something worse. Despite the huge blanked-out spaces the Prime Minister’s Office has insisted on imposing on the public record, all along this has really been a story about collusion, about certain of our politicians collaborating with hostile foreign powers to their own advantage and to further their own parties’ electoral prospects. Some MPs have been “semi-witting or witting” participants in the efforts of foreign states to interfere in Canada’s political life, the report found, particularly during the federal elections of 2019 and 2021.

This is hardly news to anyone who has been paying close attention, but the story has changed in the way its emphasis has shifted. It can no longer be told as a simple story about Canadian politicians as victims. In the story told by the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians, Canadian politicians are the culprits.

In one key respect, however, it’s been the same story, for more than 20 years. While the NSICOP report alludes to bad behaviour on the part of India’s friends in Canada, and Pakistan, and Iran and Russia are mentioned almost in passing, it’s China’s deep involvement in Canada’s democratic processes and institutions that the NSICOP report emphasizes.

By the time of the 2019 federal election, the UFWD’s budget for overseas operations was $600 million, and CSIS assessed that year that Canada had become an “attractive and permissive target” for foreign meddling. Even so, NSICOP reported that same year, public engagement was “almost non-existent.” That, too, has changed.

The public is most definitely engaged now, despite the Trudeau government’s efforts over the past year and a half to shut everything down. By filibuster, by blocking evidence demanded by House of Commons committees, and by enlisting the China-friendly, Trudeau-friendly “special rapporteur” David Johnston in a failed whitewash, the Trudeau government expended every effort to make it all go away.

The Liberals evaded the demands for a public inquiry until their minority position in the House made it impossible to stop. Trudeau and his ministers insinuated that it was all just a big fuss manufactured by anti-Chinese racists, by incompetent CSIS officials, by sour-grapes losers among failed Conservative candidates, and by dubiously-motivated CSIS whistleblowers who deserved to be hunted down and prosecuted. None of it worked.

The release of the NSICOP report followed on the equally astonishing proceedings of the Public Inquiry into Foreign Interference in April. In hearings before Commissioner Justice Marie-Josée Hogue, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his officials gave every appearance of committing something close to perjury in their efforts to dispute, dismiss and deny the veracity of incriminating evidence presented by CSIS director David Vigneault. But it was the NSICOP report that left everyone with the worst kind of unanswered questions: Who are these “traitors” on Parliament Hill?

Officially, it’s necessarily a mystery. That’s because huge swaths of the NSICOP report were redacted and expunged by the Prime Minister’s Office on the grounds that the content would be “injurious to national security, national defence or international relations,” or would violate “solicitor-client privilege.” Making things even foggier, NSICOP has been engaged in a running battle with senior officials in the PMO and several federal agencies over their habit of relying on “cabinet confidences” to withhold information. Last year, this rationale was used to blot out, in whole or in part, more than 1,000 documents NSICOP asked the government to disclose.

Even worse, Prime Minister Trudeau, NDP leader Jagmeet Singh and the Greens’ Elizabeth May, each having seen the unredacted version of the report, disagree quite dramatically about what it contains. Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre says he doesn’t want to be drawn into the cone of silence the NSICOP statute would require of him, so he doesn’t know which MPs are named in it.

Despite the furious arguments separating them on all that, there’s a weird circling of wagons going on. Everyone agrees that NSICOP has cast a “dark cloud” of suspicion over the House of Commons. All the party leaders broadly agreed last week that the unredacted version of the NSICOP report should be booted over to Justice Hogue to sort it all out. And separately, a series of national-security measures NSICOP had urged in vain on the Trudeau government for seven years is suddenly roaring through Parliament with all-party support.

Bill C-70 is already at the third-reading stage in the Senate after being introduced in the House of Commons only on May 6. Among other things, the bill contains a version of the foreign influence registry that the Liberals dragged their feet on for three years. First introduced in an April 13, 2021 private members bill tabled by Steveston — Richmond East Conservative MP Kenny Chiu, the registry was ferociously opposed by Beijing’s UFWD proxies in Canada. Chiu was defeated following a well-documented UFWD campaign to punish him at the polls.

Where things get particularly awkward for Trudeau’s Liberals is that leaked CSIS assessments consistently show that the UFWD had identified a very specific objective in the 2019 and 2021 federal elections: keeping the Conservatives out of office and ensuring a Liberal win, preferably in a more easily-manipulable minority government.

There is no way of knowing for certain whether any foreign-meddling effort in any riding in either of those federal elections influenced the vote outcome, one way or another. But however this story ends, it’s hard to see its final chapter containing the Trudeau government’s vindication. It’s much easier to imagine the story coming to a close in Justin Trudeau’s final disgrace.

Category: Uncategorized | Tags: , , , , , , ,

White Canadians Income, Education Proves “Systemic Racism” A Falsehood

Posted on by

White Canadians Income, Education Proves “Systemic Racism” A Falsehood

“Student test scores data are generally contrary to the notion that public schools are systemically racist against visible minorities,” the study notes.

Share

“An analysis of educational attainment and economic outcomes shows limited evidence of broad systemic racism in Canadian society, despite what anti-racism activists and the mandate letters from Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to his cabinet might insist.”

It is in no way an abstraction to state that our Liberal government’s proclamation of “systemic racism” in Canadian society qualifies as a calculated misnomer. Straight from the horse’s mouth at Statistics Canada arrives an initial piece of evidence:

“Median wage of economic immigrant principal applicants surpasses that of the Canadian population one year after admission.”

“In 2019, applicants of economic categories in 2018 had a median wage of $43,600, 12.4% higher than the Canadian median wage in the same year ($38,800).” 

We begin to speculate on motivation for what amounts to a false assessment from government bodies on the topic of “social equity” in Canadian society. Additional data adds to the theory that “the pot has called the kettle black.”  In fact, it may be fair to say that if systemic racism is endemic in Canada it’s actually being directed at citizens of Anglo-European heritage.

“Data On Education And Wages Don’t Show Systemic Racism In Canada: Study”

“If you take various minority groups, some of them earn more than the white population, some of them earn less. And that’s roughly what you would expect to see if Canada was a society that did not favour the white population.”

What’s up with this, Jagmeet Singh? In June, 2020 the New Democratic Party leader was quoted as saying “I think if you refuse to acknowledge that systemic racism exists, you certainly do not have an open mind to address this issue.”

Yet, if Mr. Singh drilled down on issues relating to immigrant-racialized community education and income, he would discover that Anglophones do not sit atop a “white privilege” totem pole. Why bash these communities regardless?

“If all of our institutions and the way our institutions are set up, set up on this notion that we discriminate against minorities, you would expect to see white people with the highest weekly average earnings.”

“The paper points to weekly earnings of Canadian-born men and women in 2016. White Canadians are at the middle of the pack, earning $1,530 for men and $1,120 for women.”

Well, what do you know? Turns out that whitey is, generally speaking, “your average Joe.” Naturally, that won’t do for the current prime minister of Canada.

In 2020, PM Justin Trudeau stated that “his administration will tackle ‘systemic racism,’ and break down the ‘systemic barriers’ that exclude people of colour from full participation in Canadian life.”

Sounds to CAP as if these folks are doing just as well, if not better, than white Canadians.

Why the vilification? This question has haunted Cultural Action Party [est. 2016] since the day an under-qualified politician darkened the door of the PMO in Ottawa.

Trudeau, Singh, and a host of other politicians have indulged in this practice, including omni-present Liberal MP Ahmed Hussen, a politician who has held more Cabinet files than properly-fitting outfits hanging in Chrystia Freeland’s closet:

“Hate and discrimination have no place in Canada. This is why the Government of Canada will continue to support and advance policies and programs to tackle systemic racism, secure equitable access to justice and healthcare, increase access to education and job training, and promote human rights informed by the lived experiences of peoples and communities.”

Speaking of education, we contrast half-Somalian citizen MP Hussen’s statement with a quote from a recent article published by the National Post:

“40 Canadian university professors have recommended to the House of Commons that Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) policies in federally funded research be abolished.”

“The head of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, which oversees the racial-quota-bound Canada Research Chairs Program, told the committee that he has no plans to stop identity-based hiring, even though its quota for non-white researchers has been surpassed.” 

Bingo. We come to the what should be understood as a pivotal element of the social equity debate in Canada. For effect, we repeat: “has been surpassed.”

After which CAP offer up a fundamental of our thinking. If the racial quota element has been achieved, and the program continues, what message can be extracted? Furthermore, what’s to stop this structure from being replicated in every educational institution across the country?

In this we see the shifting of socio-political tides that we believe constitute the very essence of Liberal-NDP-Trudeau-Singh politics in Canada.

It is not equality, but surpassment, that motivate the political powers that be in  Justin Trudeau’s “no core identity” Canada.

Category: Uncategorized | Tags: , , , , , ,

Anti-White Discrimination is Now Endemic in Canada

Posted on by
Restricting Whites From Employment Becomes “Systemic” In Canada
Restricting Whites From Employment Becomes “Systemic” In Canada

“The federal government also suggested discriminatory race-and gender-based hiring practices could continue regardless of targets.” Brad SalzbergMay 28 READ IN APP ShareAway from the mainstream media spotlight, a critical social issue is festering within the world of Canadian academia:Will Race & Gender-Based Hiring In Universities Continue After Quotas Are Met?As published by independent media outlet True North News, the question strikes at the heart of Canada’s oh-so-sensitive symposium on race-relations.

Based on the observation, one can be certain that the nature of the discussion will be held back from public awareness by media.“Universities are continuing to push race- and gender-based hiring practices for jobs associated with a federal government program despite “diversity, equity and inclusion” targets already being met.”“The federal government also suggested discriminatory race-and gender-based hiring practices could continue regardless of targets.” The consequences of continuation should elicit discussion regarding an ominous and potentially dangerous precedent:If(more likely when) DEI employment levels become commensurate with ethnic-religious representation in Canadian academia, and still continue to be maintained, what message is delivered to society?It would be wise to place the circumstances in the context of historical examples of racial priorities promoted by government. In this regard, we speak of the concept of white Canadians being refused employment based on the immutable fact that they are white.

“The Canadian Human Rights Act, created in 1977, is designed to ensure equality of opportunity. It prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, age, sex and a variety of other categories.”But when candidates of Anglo-European heritage are excluded based on race, suddenly it’s permissible? This is the set-up at hand, but not to worry, woke warriors, PM Justin Trudeau and his Liberal government will permit it regardless. Heck, they’re even willing pay for “reverse racism” against our communities.“In the United States, it is illegal discrimination if a person or a company intentionally treats you differently based on your race, ethnicity, or national origin. For example, a landlord violates the law if you apply to rent an apartment and are told that the landlord doesn’t rent to black people.”It’s bad enough that the Feds have put to bed the concept of the “most qualified individual gets the job,” thereby transitioning Canada’s employment standards to a neo-Marxist model.

It’s another thing when equilibrium has been accomplished, and race-based hiring continues to proliferate.”The Liberals aren’t this far-along yet in terms of “post-modern” government policies, but in the arena of “woke” politics, Canadians should by now have learned to “never say never.” What we speak of strikes at the heart of society. When governments elevate race, ethnicity, religion to the top of a nation’s socio-political totem pole, trouble eventually comes a’calling.“It has since transformed into a program that promotes DEI ideology through the allure of federal funding. The aim is to have chairs be 50.9% women, 22% visible minorities, 7.5% persons with disabilities, and 4.9% Indigenous by December 2029.“

CAP zero-in on the set-up. After which we do what establishment media are being paid to eschew:In 30 years time, when the Canadian demographic shifts white Canadians to a minority community, what shall transpire? CBC have yet to mention it(they never will), but Anglo-European demography is at present dropping like a bomb.We imagine a future scenario, applying the “percentage of ethnic community relative to employment quotas” imperative to the situation. As whites deplete in population, they are effectively barred from  employment– even when  constituting a minority community. This is racism, straight-up.

This is the social dynamic PM Trudeau and his Liberals are institutionalizing in our country. In this is intimated the true meaning of Trudeau’s “post-modern society” declaration– a euphemism for transition to a socialist society.We challenge the ambiguity of his proclamation. By “post-modern,” our PM envisions a complete socio-political inversion of Canadian society. “Racialized” in the driver’s seat, whitey to the back of the bus. Only in this case– as a result of long-term pre-conceived planning– there shall be no “Rosa Parks” to rescue Anglophones from their fate.In our opinion, Trudeau loves this, and so too New Democratic Party leader, Jagmeet Singh.

It’s one  of plethora of nefarious future scenarios that our quasi-communist leaders have in store for the future of our country.“After Reconstruction, state and local governments doubled down on these efforts by enacting Jim Crow laws, which codified the role of Black people in the Southern economy and society.” “States such as South Carolina enacted strict ‘Black Codes’ that fined Black people if they worked in any occupation other than farming or domestic servitude.”Perhaps we shouldn’t give the Feds any big ideas. In terms of systemic racial prejudice, there’s many ways to skin-a-cat. Wrapping the prejudice in a coat-of-many-colours doth not change the bottom line.As conservative writer Spencer Fernando commented in a recent article on DEI initiatives, “Racial hiring preferences are discriminatory, because instead of judging someone by their skills and actions, people are judged by their race.”Only this time out the tables have been turned toward white Canadians.Based on the hubris employed by the Liberals, NDP, multicultural industry and academic zealots, the future for Anglophones in Canada looks as shaky a maple leaf in a windstorm.
Category: Uncategorized | Tags: , , , ,

DON’T CREATE A SIKH HELL IN CANADA

Posted on by
“Don’t create a Sikh hell in Canada.”

Inderjit Singh (left) and Talwinder Singh Parmar – Two Sikhs involved in the bombing

Debris of the Air India Plane that Was bombed
DON’T CREATE A SIKH HELL IN CANADA
1. Canadians are fed up with Ethnic Group demands such as the one the Sikhs have recently made to Vancouver City Council. On the surface, Sikhs are demanding that Vancouver City Council apologize to them because the Vancouver City Council of 1914 allegedly discriminated against them by not allowing Sikh passengers on a ship called the Komagata Maru to enter Canada.
However, the probable very concerning effect of the motion will be to further handcuff any efforts to deal with unaffordable housing, a current extremely serious problem in the City of Vancouver as well as in the rest of Canada.
2. According to extensive research done by UBC Statistics Professor David Ley, relentless immigration (including very high Sikh and other East Indian immigration) is the cause of unaffordable housing in Canada. In fact, Sikh immigration has been very high and has thus been a major contributor to causing unaffordable housing. In fact, it is so high that it is no exaggeration to say that the Sikhs are on a mission to colonize parts of Canada. As many Canadians know, aggressive, treasonous Sikhs have repeatedly used the Komagata Maru incident to guilt Canadians and achieve their goal of colonization. Trudeau has disgracefully cheered them on. He is clearly guilty of gross, shameless treason. Unbelievably, Trudeau and a host of other politicians and Trudeau’s “bought-off” media seem to have never heard of Professor Ley’s research. In fact, many politicians at all three levels of government continue to say that Canada has to identify the cause of unaffordable housing! How can they be so unaware?
3. Undoubtedly, there are some British Columbia Sikhs who oppose those Sikhs who are currently demanding an apology from Vancouver City Council. Undoubtedly also, there are some Sikhs who are aware that the City of Vancouver and Canada had solid reasons for refusing to allow the passengers on the Komagata Maru to enter Canada in 1914. Let’s briefly review some of the reasons the Sikhs give for claiming they were victims of discrimination. For instance, Sikhs had been a violent separatist thorn in India’s side for many years prior to 1914. Before the Komagata Maru arrived in Vancouver, UK agents in Canada would probably have alerted Canadian authorities about violent Sikh political activity in India. The obvious question is this: Why would Canada want to import members of a group that was culturally addicted to using extreme violence to settle disputes. Ironically, government suspicions about Sikh violence became a reality in 1985, when Sikhs loaded a bomb on an Air India plane in Vancouver and murdered 329 people in retaliation against India which had put down a Sikh rebellion in India . That incident was the largest mass murder in Canadian history and will probably remain the largest mass murder until another group of so-called “peace-loving” immigrants commits a similar crime. That may be coming sooner than most Canadians think. For example, the Muslim Brotherhood (whom only an incompetent like Trudeau could love) has promised to destroy Canada!!). What has Trudeau done about that group and its threats against Canada? The answer is “Absolutely Nothing”.  A few of the Sikh perpetrators of the Air India bombing have been jailed, but most of them have completely evaded punishment. Relatives of the 329 murdered in the Sikh bomb explosion have demanded justice, but Trudeau has been too busy catering to Sikhs to listen to the survivors. In fact, Jagmeet Singh, the current NDP leader, was probably connected in some way with the Sikh bombing group. What is the proof? Up to today, India will not give Jagmeet Singh a visa to visit India because Indian authorities seem to suspect that Jagmeet Singh was connected with the bombers.
Considering all of this, many Canadians would ask why Canada would want any Sikhs. Furthermore, the leader of the Komagata Maru expedition (Gurdit Singh) threatened that if he succeeded in getting the 300+ Sikhs and others into Canada in 1914, he would bring another 25,000 immigrants to Canada!! The Sikhs also argued that the Sikh passengers were British and since Canada was a former British colony, therefore the Komagata Maru Sikhs should have been allowed into Canada. However, that is nonsense. The point is that in 1914, Canada was a sovereign country. It had the right to determine whomever it wanted to allow into Canada. The problem was that in 1914, China and Japan were sending large numbers of illegal workers to Canada. This caused bad feeling towards Asian workers. Unions Pressured Ottawa to protect Canadian workers. Like immigration advocates who today cheer the overwhelming of Canada by Asian immigration, Gurdit Singh would have profited substantially from getting a large group of East Indians into Canada. To prevent this, Ottawa would have ordered immigration authorities to protect the future of Canada, not surrender to the greed of an immigration advocate. To put the matter bluntly, (Gurdit Singh) seemed to think that Canada had no right to defend itself. Worse still, Singh seemed to think that he and his passengers had a right to enter Canada. Many Canadians will note again that Gurdit Singh sounds much like treasonous Trudeau who has repeatedly allowed illegals to enter Canada at Roxham Road.
4. In 1914, when the Komagata Maru arrived in Vancouver, Vancouver and the rest of Canada were on a relatively monocultural path to establishing one of the most successful countries on the planet. The point is that foolish and unnecessary high immigration policy of the past 40+ years will probably result in Canada losing many of its achievements and becoming like the failed countries (India and China especially) from which it now takes immigrants. Remember this fact : Neither Trudeau nor any other politicians have had the courage to consult Canadians to see if Canadians wanted mass immigration. In fact, politicians like Trudeau, Jagmeet Singh and others of their ilk have unwittingly encouraged many Canadians to conclude that capital punishment such as hanging should be re-instated in Canada. Moreover, many Canadians have concluded that the first recipients of capital punishment should be Trudeau, Singh and a large number of other quisling trash. All of them are shameless traitors to Canada and should have long ago faced charges of treason.
5. As far as the Sikhs and Vancouver City Council are concerned, it should be clear now that if Vancouver City Council had wanted to champion a cause, it would have made much more sense for it to champion the cause of the relatives of the Air India victims than the cause of the Sikhs manipulators who have led the petition for an apology. Let’s be frank : Like the collection of MP’s currently in Canada’s Parliament and in many provincial legislatures, Vancouver’s City Council is a collection of boot-lickers looking for another boot to lick. They are weak cowards and will betray Canada.
The wisest thing that Vancouver City Council could do now would be to tell all the Sikh apology-promoters to go straight to Hell. That hell could be either the Hell of Christian Scripture or it could be the environmental and political Hell called The Punjab which the Sikhs have disastrously created in India. Who in his right mind would want to create a duplicate of Punjabi Hell in Canada?
For more information, please consult the following sources:
A timeline of the Air India case, from the bombings to the death of an old suspectA Review and Short summary of SFU Professor H. Johnston’s book “The Voyage of the Komagata Maru”, Apr 2014In 2021, Vancouver’s Mayor and City Council Apologized for the Komagata Maru Incident

v

Category: Uncategorized | Tags: , , , ,

Au Contraire, It’s Not A “Toxic Environment”, It’s Righteous Questioning About Red Chinese Influence Peddling: They Can’t Stand the Heat — Trudeau Foundation president, board resign, citing ‘politicization’ of China-linked donation

Posted on by

Trudeau Foundation president, board resign, citing ‘politicization’ of China-linked donation

Social Sharing

Charity’s leadership cites controversy over Beijing-linked donor to explain the move

Richard Raycraft · CBC News · Posted: Apr 11, 2023 6:51 AM PDT | Last Updated: 5 hours ago

A red and yellow Chinese flag.
The Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation’s board of directors and president have resigned, citing the political controversy from a donation a Chinese government adviser made to the charity. (Thomas Peter/Reuters)

The Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation’s president and board of directors have resigned en masse, citing the charity’s entanglement in the ongoing foreign interference controversy.

In a statement, the foundation said that a $200,000 donation in 2016 from a businessman linked to the Chinese government “has put a great deal of pressure on the foundation’s management and volunteer board of directors, as well as on our staff and our community.” 

The charity announced last month that it would return the donation. The Conservatives criticized the government over the matter, saying the donation compromised a government report on the integrity of the 2021 federal election.

“The circumstances created by the politicization of the foundation have made it impossible to continue with the status quo, and the volunteer board of directors has resigned, as has the president and CEO,” the statement said.

WATCH | Trudeau reacts to CEO, board resignations at Trudeau Foundation

Trudeau reacts to CEO, board resignations at Trudeau Foundation

7 hours agoDuration 0:55Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says the foundation will continue to make a positive impact on academic institutions across the country.

The foundation is independent and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has no involvement with it.

“The Trudeau Foundation is a foundation with which I have absolutely no intersection,” Trudeau told a news conference Tuesday.

“It is a shame to see the level of toxicity and political polarization that is going on in our country these days, but I am certain that the Trudeau Foundation will be able to continue to ensure that research into the social studies and humanities at the highest levels across Canadian academic institutions continues for many years to come.”

The charity, established in 2001 to honour former prime minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau, funds scholarships, mentorships and fellowships.

Last month, Prime Minister Trudeau appointed former governor general David Johnston as a special rapporteur to investigate foreign interference in Canadian elections and institutions, including alleged meddling by the Chinese government.

The Conservatives have questioned Johnston’s impartiality, in part by pointing to Johnston’s former role as a member of the Trudeau Foundation. Foundation members are responsible for appointing the board of directors.

Johnston resigned from the foundation following his appointment as special rapporteur. Trudeau has defended the choice, citing Johnston’s long career in public service.

The statement said three directors will remain on an interim basis to continue the charity’s work while a new board is appointed. The foundation’s website currently lists six members of the board of directors.

Its president and CEO, Pascale Fournier, had been in the position for almost five years.

Poilievre calls for investigation

Reacting to news of the resignations Tuesday morning, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre called for an investigation into the charity.

“We need to investigate the Beijing-funded Trudeau Foundation,” Poilievre tweeted.

“We need to know who got rich, who got paid and who got privilege and power from Justin Trudeau as a result of funding to the Trudeau Foundation.”https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=false&embedId=twitter-widget-1

Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet said the resignations make the 2016 donation look more suspicious. He called on Johnston to step down as special rapporteur and for the government to call a public inquiry into foreign interference.

“Nothing else will do,” Blanchet said in a French statement.

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh said he won’t comment on the Trudeau Foundation specifically. He repeated his calls for a public inquiry.

WATCH | Singh repeats call for public inquiry after Trudeau Foundation president, board resign

Singh repeats call for public inquiry after Trudeau Foundation president, board resign

6 hours agoDuration 0:57During a press conference at St. Clair College in Windsor, Ont., NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh is asked about the resignation of the president and board of directors of the Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation. A statement from the foundation said ‘the circumstances created by the politicization of the foundation have made it impossible to continue with the status quo.’

“What we’ve seen from both the Liberals and the Conservatives, they’re more interested in scoring political points, pointing fingers at each other,” Singh told a news conference.

“When it comes to something as serious as our democracy, the goal shouldn’t be to score points … We’ve been saying we need a public inquiry to get to the truth, to give Canadians confidence.”

Category: Uncategorized | Tags: , , , , ,

Justin Trudeau, Jagmeet Singh And Sikh Nationalism: The Untold Story http://canadafirst.nfshost.com/?p=2729

Posted on by


Open in app or online
Justin Trudeau, Jagmeet Singh And Sikh Nationalism: The Untold Story

Canadians are being kept in the dark regarding the degree to which Sikh Nationalism has permeated our political environment.

Brad Salzberg

Apr 5










Open in app or online


Justin Trudeau, Jagmeet Singh And Sikh Nationalism: The Untold Story
Canadians are being kept in the dark regarding the degree to which Sikh Nationalism has permeated our political environment.






Brad Salzberg




Apr 5











 




































Save






▷  Listen






 









Pictured, Canadian prime minister, with one of his 3rd world priority communities.
Share
“The head of an Indo-Canadian organization in British Columbia has complained to local law enforcement about receiving death threats from Khalistani radicals after he organised a reception last month in honour of India’s High Commissioner to Ottawa.”

Due to media obfuscation, Canadians are being kept in the dark regarding the degree to which Sikh Nationalism has permeated our political environment.

Cultural Action Party liken it to a secret pact. As buried by CBC and corporate media, PM Justin Trudeau and political partner Jagmeet Singh are quietly backing Khalistani state independence in India.

New Democratic Party leader Singh is so deep in the mud that the government of India has banned his turbaned-self from entering their country. Lucky for him that Canadian media has successfully covered up the radical nature of the NDP leader, whose family emigrated from India a generation ago.

To place the situation in context, one must understand the nature of contemporary Canadian politics. The first lesson to learn is that the phenomenon is fervently non-Canadian. In our era of globalism, the needs of Canadian-born citizens take a back seat to the desires of globalist forces such as Sikhism, China and the nation of Islam.

“What did the promptness of NDP leader Jagmeet Singh, MP Sonia Sidhu, and others in tweeting about the Punjab situation after Amritpal Singh’s incident and ban on Internet services, say? It was done at the behest of radical votebanks,” says a Brampton Sikh entrepreneur, requesting anonymity.”

Picking up on the vibe, fellow Canadian patriots? In basic terms, both Trudeau and Singh are leveraging support of Khalistan independence to win the Sikh-Canadian vote. We stand aghast as irony drips from the brow of astute Canadians:

Justin Trudeau and Jagmeet Singh are fully dedicated to independent Khalistan nationhood. Given the zealotry involved– not to mention the militancy– it is obvious that nothing less than a Sikh-dominated social and political environment is the intended outcome.

As in– no immigration, no multiculturalism, as well as monolithic religious identity. In other words, an independent state devoid of every fundamental Trudeau and Singh are forcing down the throats of Canadians..

Media say nothing. Not a drop of the inherent irony flows from the pens of our country’s leading journalists. There you have it– the press in Canada are:

Pro-communist China, pro-Sikh nationalism, pro-Islam. The only thing they are not is pro-Canada. In 2023, this is the condition of PM Trudeau’s “no core identity” society.  Trudeau is using Khalistani independence to win the support of Sikh communities from coast-to-coast.

According to Statistics Canada, Sikhism represents 1.4% of the Canadian population— in contradistinction to accumulated political power:

Premier of Yukon, Ranj Pallai.  Leader of NDP, Jagmeet Singh. Liberal Cabinet Members– Harjit Sajjan, Kamal Khera, .

Liberal MPs: Anju Dhillon, Bardish Chagger, George Chahal, Iqwinder Gaheer, Mahinder Sindu, Randeep Sarai, Ruby Sahota, Sonia Sidhu, Sukh Dahliwal, Parm Bains.

Mayor of Calgary, Jhoti Gondek. Mayor of Edmonton, Amarjeet Singh. 

Again, just 1.4% of our population is Sikh. Talk about GIANT over-representation in government. Media speak not a word about this reality.

Put it all together in a blender, shake and stir, and what is the final outcome? Sikh political power in Canada, including bi-lateral Liberal-NDP federal party support for an independent Sikh nation to be located halfway around the world.
Sensible Canadians know how to summarize the situation: this is Canadian politics in 2023.

Let us think back to the founding of the international state of “Canadastan.” CAP attribute this gem to none other than ex-Liberal PM, Pierre Trudeau. Communist in political orientation, this individual began our transition to a globalist nation-state. Or better put, a “non-state,” as communist philosophy advances.

Beginning with an opening of our national doors to the communist government of China, we note an affinity by which current PM Justin Trudeau runs our country.  In 2015, Trudeau Jr. began to integrate Islam and Sikhism into the fabric of our nation.

Is it overly simplistic to state that more than any force in Canadian history, it is the Trudeau family who destroyed Canadian nationalism? Is it not this communist-admiring Quebecois duo who transformed society into a condition no citizen ever asked for, or approved of?
“When events such as the arrest of Amritpal Singh happen, Khalistan supporters bombard the offices of mayors, MPs, MPPs and Ministers with messages, forcing them to issue hasty statements or tweet,” says an Indo-Canadian restaurant owner in Toronto.”

Which MPs, Mayors and Ministers? The ones listed above, in a political effort completely devoid of Canadian content? Does Canada now exist for the benefit of the Punjab?

Sadly, this is the case. Jagmeet Singh, golden boy of the Canadian press, is one privileged individual. While he prances around in Vaisakhi parades pushing Khalistan independence, CBC and corporate media have not a negative word to say about the man.

Working his buns off for Khalistan while branding Canadians racist is par for the course. “Not a worry, Mr. Singh. Justin Trudeau is paying our salaries, and we tow the globalist line accordingly.”

“Politicians must stop playing identity politics. A criminal is a criminal — not a Sikh or a Hindu or a Muslim. By supporting these elements, ministers and MPs are playing dangerous games and harming Canada which needs India more than ever now.”

Forget about it, buddy-boy. Woke liberalism specializes in carving up communities into distinct silos, only to get them fighting each other within general society. See Marx, Karl for details.

What this person is describing is not some fringe element of Justin Trudeau’s post-modern society. It is contemporary Canada, and thanks to the family Trudeau and traitorous politicians like Jagmeet Singh, it is here to stay.
 












Save


▷  Listen


 


Pictured, Canadian prime minister, with one of his 3rd world priority communities.Share“The head of an Indo-Canadian organization in British Columbia has complained to local law enforcement about receiving death threats from Khalistani radicals after he organised a reception last month in honour of India’s High Commissioner to Ottawa.”Due to media obfuscation, Canadians are being kept in the dark regarding the degree to which Sikh Nationalism has permeated our political environment.Cultural Action Party liken it to a secret pact. As buried by CBC and corporate media, PM Justin Trudeau and political partner Jagmeet Singh are quietly backing Khalistani state independence in India.New Democratic Party leader Singh is so deep in the mud that the government of India has banned his turbaned-self from entering their country. Lucky for him that Canadian media has successfully covered up the radical nature of the NDP leader, whose family emigrated from India a generation ago.To place the situation in context, one must understand the nature of contemporary Canadian politics. The first lesson to learn is that the phenomenon is fervently non-Canadian. In our era of globalism, the needs of Canadian-born citizens take a back seat to the desires of globalist forces such as Sikhism, China and the nation of Islam.“What did the promptness of NDP leader Jagmeet Singh, MP Sonia Sidhu, and others in tweeting about the Punjab situation after Amritpal Singh’s incident and ban on Internet services, say? It was done at the behest of radical votebanks,” says a Brampton Sikh entrepreneur, requesting anonymity.”Picking up on the vibe, fellow Canadian patriots? In basic terms, both Trudeau and Singh are leveraging support of Khalistan independence to win the Sikh-Canadian vote. We stand aghast as irony drips from the brow of astute Canadians:Justin Trudeau and Jagmeet Singh are fully dedicated to independent Khalistan nationhood. Given the zealotry involved– not to mention the militancy– it is obvious that nothing less than a Sikh-dominated social and political environment is the intended outcome.As in– no immigration, no multiculturalism, as well as monolithic religious identity. In other words, an independent state devoid of every fundamental Trudeau and Singh are forcing down the throats of Canadians..Media say nothing. Not a drop of the inherent irony flows from the pens of our country’s leading journalists. There you have it– the press in Canada are:Pro-communist China, pro-Sikh nationalism, pro-Islam. The only thing they are not is pro-Canada. In 2023, this is the condition of PM Trudeau’s “no core identity” society.  Trudeau is using Khalistani independence to win the support of Sikh communities from coast-to-coast.According to Statistics Canada, Sikhism represents 1.4% of the Canadian population— in contradistinction to accumulated political power:Premier of Yukon, Ranj Pallai.  Leader of NDP, Jagmeet Singh. Liberal Cabinet Members– Harjit Sajjan, Kamal Khera, Anita Anand.Liberal MPs: Anju Dhillon, Bardish Chagger, George Chahal, Iqwinder Gaheer, Mahinder Sindu, Randeep Sarai, Ruby Sahota, Sonia Sidhu, Sukh Dahliwal, Parm Bains.Mayor of Calgary, Jhoti Gondek. Mayor of Edmonton, Amarjeet Singh. Again, just 1.4% of our population is Sikh. Talk about GIANT over-representation in government. Media speak not a word about this reality.Put it all together in a blender, shake and stir, and what is the final outcome? Sikh political power in Canada, including bi-lateral Liberal-NDP federal party support for an independent Sikh nation to be located halfway around the world.Sensible Canadians know how to summarize the situation: this is Canadian politics in 2023.Let us think back to the founding of the international state of “Canadastan.” CAP attribute this gem to none other than ex-Liberal PM, Pierre Trudeau. Communist in political orientation, this individual began our transition to a globalist nation-state. Or better put, a “non-state,” as communist philosophy advances.Beginning with an opening of our national doors to the communist government of China, we note an affinity by which current PM Justin Trudeau runs our country.  In 2015, Trudeau Jr. began to integrate Islam and Sikhism into the fabric of our nation.Is it overly simplistic to state that more than any force in Canadian history, it is the Trudeau family who destroyed Canadian nationalism? Is it not this communist-admiring Quebecois duo who transformed society into a condition no citizen ever asked for, or approved of?“When events such as the arrest of Amritpal Singh happen, Khalistan supporters bombard the offices of mayors, MPs, MPPs and Ministers with messages, forcing them to issue hasty statements or tweet,” says an Indo-Canadian restaurant owner in Toronto.”Which MPs, Mayors and Ministers? The ones listed above, in a political effort completely devoid of Canadian content? Does Canada now exist for the benefit of the Punjab?Sadly, this is the case. Jagmeet Singh, golden boy of the Canadian press, is one privileged individual. While he prances around in Vaisakhi parades pushing Khalistan independence, CBC and corporate media have not a negative word to say about the man.Working his buns off for Khalistan while branding Canadians racist is par for the course. “Not a worry, Mr. Singh. Justin Trudeau is paying our salaries, and we tow the globalist line accordingly.””Politicians must stop playing identity politics. A criminal is a criminal — not a Sikh or a Hindu or a Muslim. By supporting these elements, ministers and MPs are playing dangerous games and harming Canada which needs India more than ever now.”Forget about it, buddy-boy. Woke liberalism specializes in carving up communities into distinct silos, only to get them fighting each other within general society. See Marx, Karl for details.What this person is describing is not some fringe element of Justin Trudeau’s post-modern society. It is contemporary Canada, and thanks to the family Trudeau and traitorous politicians like Jagmeet Singh, it is here to stay.
Category: Uncategorized | Tags: , , ,

Canadians Will Be Told to Celebrate Sikh Heritage Month in April

Posted on by

Canadians Will Be Told to Celebrate Sikh Heritage Month in April

by Dan Murray, Immigration Watch Canada – March 28, 2023 https://immigrationwatchcanada.org/  

Most Canadians are probably not aware that on April 1 of this year, they will be told to celebrate “Sikh Heritage Month”.   The following is a list of reasons why Parliament should have never even considered the celebration of a “Sikh Heritage Month” (the result of a law passed by Canada’s Parliament.).   (1)

The behaviour of some of the earliest Sikhs to arrive in Canada in 1914 was a foreshadowing and a warning. It demonstrated Sikh willingness to use fraudulent documents. It also showed their arrogant attitude. They believed that they had a right to enter Canada and that Canada had no right to oppose their entry. Current NDP leader Jagmeet Singh has the same arrogant attitude.   That 1914 incident helps to explain much of what happened later. Sikhs repeatedly use that event to proclaim victim status. They omit many facts including the fact that Sikhs assassinated a Canadian immigration agent. They also omit the fact that the leader of the 1914 Sikh expedition boasted that if he succeeded in landing his passengers, he would bring 25,000 more Sikhs soon after. This threat would have alarmed Canadians because if it had come true, it would have greatly changed Vancouver’s entire cultural make-up.   To show some context, consider this: around 1914, the City of Vancouver had a population of about 60,000. For details of the entire 1914 incident, see https://immigrationwatchcanada.org/2008/05/22/the-voyage-of-the-komagata-maru-a-review-and-a-short-summary/   (2)

Although many years of Sikh immigration peace followed, the Singh Decision of 1985 signaled the beginning of Sikh-caused refugee and immigration chaos in Canada. In doing so, Sikhs helped to turn Canada’s refugee system into a quasi-judicial body which soon became mired in tens of thousands of claims (most of them illegitimate). For details see: https://immigrationwatchcanada.org/2005/03/23/the-1985-singh-decision-disaster-vs-the-1985-air-india-disaster/    According to reliable sources, those claims have cost Canada billions of dollars and saddled Canada with people who have contempt for Canada. Is this supposed to be an example of the “Sikh Heritage” that Canadians are expected to celebrate every April?   (3)

The Sikh bombing (the murder of 329 people about an Air India plane in 1985) should have moved Canada to place severe restrictions on Sikh immigration. But it did not. That bombing incident (which originated in Vancouver where Sikhs placed bombs on two planes) was the largest mass murder in Canadian history. Instead for years, Trudeau has groveled to the Sikhs. Most important, none of the Sikh ringleaders of the 329 murders has been sentenced for that crime. https://immigrationwatchcanada.org/2016/04/25/dont-apologize-sikhs/   We repeat, Is this another example of the “Sikh Heritage” that Canadians are supposed to celebrate every April?   (4)

A major reason why the Sikh bombers have never been held to account is the culture of intimidation by militant Sikhs of other Sikhs. The identities of the Sikh perpetrators are quite likely known even by the Sikh members of Trudeau’s cabinet, not to mention Trudeau himself and hundreds of other Sikh politicians and professionals.   As a result, hundreds of the relatives of the 329 murdered victims have never received justice. Until the Sikh criminals are behind bars, the word “Sikh” will be a dirty word to those relatives and to millions of other Canadians. Most Canadians want nothing to do with those Sikhs – let alone celebrate “SIKH HERITAGE”.   (5)

Worse still, young and older male Sikhs have become significantly involved in drug industry criminality in Canada. However, when drug incidents are reported, our treacherous CBC and other media make a point of not disclosing the names of the Sikh murderers or Sikhs murdered. Most Canadians have come to expect that when the CBC or other media begrudgingly do reveal the names of the criminals, those names will be ones such as Parvinder, Balwinder or some other Sikh first name. In Metro Vancouver, Sikhs have complained that they needed more police to deal with drug-dealing and drug gang killings. Ironically, the truth is that many people in Metro Vancouver think that Metro Vancouver does not need more police. Instead, it needs fewer Sikhs and less Sikh immigration. In fact, Metro Vancouver residents have also thought that Sikh parents had to finally accept a “Canadian” cultural trait, that of being responsible for their delinquent offspring. Those parents should not be expecting the “gum’mint” to do that job for them. Again, is this very visible Sikh cultural defect what corrupt Sikhs want all Canadians to celebrate every April?   (6)

Canadians have become incredibly fed up with aggressive immigrants (both Sikhs and others) who demand that Canada adapt to immigrant customs. So far, no group has made as many demands for exemptions from Canadian laws as the Sikhs. In fact, Sikh demands to wear their turbans and their kirpans have been endless. If Sikhs really want to retain their customs, why are they here? Why would Canada want to create (A) another political mess such as India’s Punjab here and (B) an environmental disaster such as India in Canada through relentless Sikh immigration?   (7)

Sikhs have grossly abused Canadian PM Chretien’s naive decision to create an additional Canadian consulate in India’s Punjab. That consulate has become notorious for being the fraud capital of all of Canada’s consulates and embassies in the world. Tens of thousands of Sikhs have entered Canada as a result of fraud there. In other words, tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of Sikhs have entered Canada illegally. Why would Canada want to celebrate being defrauded by these people? The numbers are not an exaggeration. At recent Sikh festivals in the Vancouver and Toronto areas, some Sikh leaders have boasted that up to 500,000 Sikhs attended. Who else besides corrupt Liberal leader Trudeau and equally corrupt NDP leader Jagmeet Singh would want to celebrate a heritage of political sodomy and shameless fraud?   (8)

Political accommodation to the Sikhs has reached new levels of degradation under Trudeau. It is incredible that not a single MP voted against or abstained from voting when the “Sikh Heritage Month” bill was introduced in Parliament.   To summarize: Is it sane to accept Sikh political degradation as part of Canada’s “heritage”?   This list could be ten times as long.   To put the matter bluntly but truthfully, the passing of the Sikh Heritage Act in 2015 is an example of how Canada’s Parliament has descended into the most degrading acts of political sodomy and boot-licking.  

Our CBC and many politicians are proud to engage in such activity, but to recover Parliament’s dignity, here is what Parliament should do immediately :   REPEAL THE “SIKH HERITAGE MONTH” BILL .   IN ITS PLACE, INTRODUCE NEW BILLS TO PROTECT CANADA’S FRENCH AND UK HERITAGE AND PROTECT CANADA’S BORDERS !!   For details about Jagmeet Singh’s involvement in Sikh violence, see https://www.reddit.com/r/metacanada/comments/hen2eb/reminder_jagmeet_singh_is_banned_from_india_for/   Dan Murray, Immigration Watch Canada   \

Also see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_India_Flight_182

Category: Uncategorized | Tags: , , , ,
Older Entries →