Attached is a video slamming Canadian immigration propaganda. Of course, Trudeau plans to replace Canadians with the Third Worlders It is his idea of the future.
He is a tyrant who hates all Whites, especially English. Now he is a dynastic ruler of Canada surrounded by “yes” politicians to his liking. What do we have? Taxation slavery, housing out of reach for young Canadians, unless they go begging to the bank, below replacement fertility for Canadians, high crime rates and imported terrorism, out of control government regulations, etc.
C:\Users\Winuser\Downloads\Top 5 reasons not to move to Canada _ Why Canada is broken(4).mp4
Toronto Residents Are Fleeing Diversity in Record Numbers While Mass Immigration Floods the City
Toronto prides itself as being a “world class city” and loudly proclaims the joys of diversity. In fact many residents in record numbers, disagree. Many longtime residents know better. Last year, a record 78,100 people left the city (up from 73,500 the year before). A quarter of these are leaving the country. People are fed up with beggars, homeless encampments, impossible traffic gridlock, lunatics stabbing complete strangers on the subway and the confusion and disorientation of “diversity.”
Those leaving are being replacement with hordes of Trudeau’s immigrants almost all from the Third World — the politics of replacement at work.
As a personal example, on Tuesday, it took me two and a half hours in mid afternoon to drive less than a mile from Church and Queen St. to the Gardiner Expressway. There was no snow or ice or accidents, Road construction, lanes blocked off with cones but no work being done, University Avenue, a four lane road in each direction, reduced in some places to one lane by construction, and other blockages.
Toronto Residents Are Leaving At A Record Pace, Immigration Takes Over Growth
Greater Toronto experienced a massive population boom, but that may be peaking soon. Statistics Canada (Stat Can) data shows Toronto CMA’s population was booming in 2022. Drilling down into the numbers reveals the growth was just immigration. The artificial growth trend obfuscates the record outflow of residents from the region. The headline data looks great, but people might be seeing more opportunity elsewhere.
Greater Toronto’s Population Added Over 138,000 People In 2022
Much like the rest of Canada, Greater Toronto’s population has been surging in growth. The latest estimate puts Toronto CMA at 6.69 million people in 2022, up 2.1% (+138,240) from last year. About half (49.5%) of that growth was in the City of Toronto, which would have been an impressive number itself.
Immigration Is The Primary Driver of Toronto’s Population
Immigration is the primary driver of this trend, as Canada catches up on a backlog. Greater Toronto welcomed 159,679 immigrants in 2022, up 103% (+80,830) from the year before. Depending on how you look at it, two things stand out—the growth rate and the number of people.
Greater Toronto Has Seen A Record Immigrant Inflow
The annual number of immigrants that arrived in Canada and settled in the Greater Toronto region.
Year
Immigrants
2002
123,066
2003
86,798
2004
101,809
2005
103,176
2006
107,084
2007
90,501
2008
89,479
2009
82,739
2010
90,961
2011
82,227
2012
78,391
2013
83,620
2014
79,616
2015
71,207
2016
91,673
2017
75,061
2018
102,740
2019
106,700
2020
96,775
2021
78,849
2022
159,679
Source: Statistics Canada; Better Dwelling.
Doubling the volume of immigrants in the region seems like an odd trend, and it was. As mentioned earlier, a backlog left the prior year’s number of immigrants at a multi-year low. The growth is a bit of a base effect, though it’s still a huge number.
The second thing you might have noticed—there were more immigrants than total growth. No, it’s not due to deaths—Toronto residents are picking up and moving at a record pace.
Over 78,000 Greater Toronto Residents Fled To Another Part of Ontario
Net intraprovincial migration is the balance of people that left Toronto CMA for another part of Ontario. The net outflow was 78,100 people in 2022, following a 73,500 person outflow the year before. An outflow means more people left for other parts of Ontario than arrived. In this case, by the tens of thousands—the most in at least a generation.
Greater Toronto Residents Are Leaving In Record Volumes
The net flow of Greater Toronto residents to other parts of Ontario (intraprovincial migration), and other parts of Canada interprovincial migration). Negative numbers mean more people left than arrived in Toronto CMA. InterprovincialIntraprovincial200220062010201420182022-80,000-70,000-60,000-50,000-40,000-30,000-20,000-10,000010,000People
Year
Interprovincial
Intraprovincial
2002
2,414
-23,190
2003
192
-25,623
2004
-2,255
-26,163
2005
-2,906
-23,843
2006
-6,523
-19,617
2007
-7,474
-13,882
2008
-6,650
-15,399
2009
-6,427
-12,310
2010
-1,144
-19,583
2011
126
-16,153
2012
-3,391
-20,324
2013
-4,471
-19,879
2014
-4,811
-21,391
2015
-1,486
-25,070
2016
6,833
-34,227
2017
7,431
-47,969
2018
4,897
-48,280
2019
2,718
-46,549
2020
1,550
-56,305
2021
-10,136
-73,511
2022
-21,388
-78,077
Source: Statistics Canada; Better Dwelling.
Toronto Is No Longer A Place Where Other Canadians Seek Opportunity
Remember when Toronto was a hub for people from other provinces across Canada? Those days are long gone as net interprovincial migration turned deeply negative. INTER is the net flow of people between Toronto CMA and other provinces. The net was an outflow of 21,400 people in 2022, more than double the previous year. The region had a positive flow as recently as 2019, only turning negative as the low rate bubble took off.
Over 1 In 4 Canadians That Left Canada Were Toronto Residents
Emigration, the act of permanently leaving Canada, takes serious commitment. However, thousands of people from Greater Toronto were up to the task. Toronto CMA saw 12,625 people emigrate to another country, up 38.1% from the previous year. Greater Toronto represented roughly 1 in 4 people leaving Canada.
Greater Toronto’s emigrants hit the highest level since 2017. Though it’s worth remembering other countries also have application backlogs. Don’t be too surprised if emigration volumes continue to rise over the next few years.
What does this all mean? Like we mention when discussing provincial migration, this is mostly a sentiment indicator. Toronto’s population is growing and that means a boost to the economy, at least at the aggregate level. However, aggregate boosts can hide a drop in quality of life by just adding more economic units. Sorry, we mean human capital stock, the accepted political term.
Residents leaving in large numbers is a big concern that usually slips under the radar. Immigrants tend to land in hubs based on lagging data showing opportunity. Residents can spot an erosion in opportunity or decline in quality of life as it occurs. As they start seeing a better opportunity elsewhere, so do their peers. It’s only a matter of time before immigrants begin to see it elsewhere too.
We all use mythical language, although we seldom admit it. In contrast to concepts which are the hallmarks of modern discourse, myths are based on images and symbolic forms of speech. In the mythmaking narrative images change and vary over historical time and place although their driving force remains constant in the identity building process of peoples, tribes, nations, including political movements. Many Christians, along with many atheists and agnostics, who deride as surreal ancient Greek myths, resort to their own self-made myths, adorning them with their own pack of metaphors and imagery. In a sharp contrast to the historically recorded end-of-time, single-God revelation religions, such as Judaism, Islam and Christianity, European myths surfacing in epics, folk tales, legends or sagas have the advantage of overstepping the historical timeframe. They fuse the past present and future in one whole, offering the hope of gods’ return and announcing the rebirth of a vanished or destroyed political order.
The man of the myth discovers his freedom not in the possibility of building up his own history, but in the fact of being free vis-à-vis history. It is in the abolition, relativization and reinterpretation of history that he finds his freedom.[i]
Ancient Europeans who believed in myths had a profound historical consciousness. Yet—unlike Christians, Jews or Muslims, let alone unlike modern political true believers—they could neither grasp nor embrace a linear historical and “unique” narrative announcing the beginning of time and the end of time. To a traditional man, of the myth, history, with its incessant flow of time, is always open. The belief in a plurality of gods means also the ability of accepting the plurality of ideas, the plurality of different truths and consequently rejecting a single religious or political dogma.
The tragic side of life is a cornerstone of ancient myths, as depicted in ancient Greek epics and dramas. However, one never spots in ancient mythical prose or poems signs of religious and political nihilism. The man of the myth is essentially a historical optimist: he believes in the return of historical cycles that will also bring about the return of the hero and witness the rebirth of gods, even if the sky is doomed to fall with the entire cosmos swept in chaos. One of the sharpest American scholars of the twentieth century, Joseph Campbell, understood well the subconscious human desire for the world of the myth, myths being “like dreams, revelations of the deepest hopes, desires and fears, potentialities and conflicts, of the human will.” [ii] The mythical world is anchored in all of us, as can be witnessed by an ever-growing interest in the mythical characters inhabiting J. R. R. Tolkien’s novels or George Lucas’ movie Star Wars, as well as in the proliferation of hundreds of science fiction movies.
Despite his insight into various faces of mythmaking Campbell was not spared from demonization by new mythmakers who labeled him with their own mythicist vocabulary an “antisemite and racist.”[iii]
Vice, or better yet, virtue signaling squads of the modern morality police, such as the SPLC or the ADL, were quick to shove Campbell into the realm of underground demons.
Resorting to a mythical language is also a prime goal of modern political demagoguery. The word ‘myth’ is often used incorrectly in defaming a political adversary. This word, when used in political discourse carries a derogatory meaning, bearing no resemblance to the ancient belief in mythos. Today its verbal derivatives are widely used to delegitimize the beliefs of a political opponent, often having the goal of ruining his reputation in the public eye by painting him as some kind of a conspiracy theorist. The problem with conspiracy theorists, regardless whether they come from the Left or the rightwing political spectrum is that they can never be refuted with any empirical, forensic and contradictory argument.
To a very extent that conspiracy theories claim to “explain” everything, rejecting out of hand any contradiction and any argument put forward against them is seen either as a proof of their opponents’ “naivete”, or a simple plot by conspiracy theorists aiming to prevent them from being exposed. Any contradiction any denial only becomes an additional proof of the existence of conspiracy.”[iv]
Many conservative and nationalist authors in their own description of leftwing opponents have popularized expressions such as the “myth of progress,” the “myth of Marxism,” “the myth of multiculturism.” On their part, left-leaning authors accuse nationalists and conservatives of believing in the myth of race and the myth of Jewish world conspiracy. Many Jewish and liberal authors, however, seldom tire from resurrecting their own conspiracy-laden language depicting and evoking the mythical and ever lurking “white supremacist,” anti-Semite, or Neo-Nazi bent on destroying the liberal democratic order. Even if White anti-Semites and Neo-Nazis were to disappear, the Liberal System would need to reinvent them over and over again – similar to the ex-Soviet Union and its former client states who, in order to justify their repressive nature, constantly kept resurrecting the myth of the Fascist Evil.
Without using over and over again the modern myth of the Absolute Cosmic Evil, allegedly incorporated today in the eternal Neo-Nazi and White Supremacist, the Liberal System would fall part.
To the word of the myth, one could substitute more hyperbolic verbal constructs such as the “big lie,” the “grand hoax,” or “political theology,” or even “fake news,”—expressions which are quite trendy among conservative and nationalist authors. While the Left likes to denounce the “myth of the White race” as a sign of pseudoscientific and retarded mindset, the Right, by contrast, denounces the liberal and communist myth of egalitarianism as a belief contrary to the laws of evolutionary biology.
Credo quia absurdum, or the belief in the Big Lie.
The line between a belief in the big lie and a belief in some kind of a myth is often blurred. It is wrong to assume that only a few bad people impose their political lies on a credulous or stupid populace. Very often it is savants and allegedly great minds who are believers and instigators of surreal political myths, strange beliefs, bizarre victimhood stories which they usually discard after some time and replace them with new trendy myths or hoaxes. Often masses deliberately accept new political myths because it is all too human to take wishful thinking for granted. In the study of crowd hysteria, Gustave Le Bon observes how masses accept political myths without ever reflecting upon their disastrous consequences:
Crowds being only capable of thinking in images are only to be impressed by images. It is only images that terrify or attract them and become motives of action.[v]
It can be the mythic imagery of the shining communist future, or the myth of the end of the world caused by the Covid pandemic that can whip up masses into political frenzy or justify the most severe forms of political repression. Religions, as well as modern beliefs and ideologies are also heavily interwoven with mythical scenes. Often those who ridicule beliefs in the mythical nature of the scenes from the Bible or from Homer’s Iliad are receptive to modern myths of a Marxist classless paradise on earth or the nature of permanent economic growth in Liberalism. One may recall intellectual enchantment with the Freudian-Marxist mystique by hundreds of thousands of US and European college professors in the first half of the twentieth century and extending even after psychoanalysis had lost all scientific credibility and communism had resulted only in political repression and economic stagnation. By the end of the century, these professors had no qualms in replacing their former ideologies with new myths of the free market and the myth of the invisible hand. The capitalist myth aptly called “monotheism of the market” by the French philosopher Roger Garaudy, suggests the belief in permanent economic growth as the only salutary objective of human existence.[vi]
But one must be careful when reading Garaudy’s texts, as well as those of hundreds of other popular academics and authors preaching formulas of religious or political salvation. Garaudy was a reputable World War II antifascist resistant fighter, later a high-ranking French communist party member and a renowned intellectual—before he turned into a devout Muslim toward the end of his life. For his revisionist and anti-Israeli writings, he was also charged and convicted by the French courts with anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial, claiming it to be a “Jewish myth.”[vii] Regardless of what one may think of Garaudy’s many astute observations about Israel, Jews, and American decadence, recanting his once upon-a-time mythical persona and accepting the other mythical opposite is not a sign of integrity of character.
Many revisionist scholars critical of Jews and their social status depict the Jewish World War II victimhood as a new secular religion containing its own legions of saints, sacraments, salvagers and survivors. What strikes one is the following: while one may openly downplay, deride and minimize the number of victims of communist killing fields during the Ukrainian Holodomor, the Croat Bleiburg, the Gulag sewage system in the ex-Soviet Union, or the millions of killed German civilians, during and after World War II without facing legal troubles, critical debates on the Jewish Holocaust story must stay off limits—an excellent marker of the power of the Jewish community.
But even authors complaining about legal duplicity regarding the narrative of Jewish victimhood are seldom consistent. Many of them believe in good faith in the immaculate conception of Virgin Mary and various surreal miracles performed by Jesus and his early Jewish disciples. They would never consider their faith in Jesus a myth, let alone, a hoax, a fraud, or a conspiracy theory. They reject the claims by anti-Christian authors “that Jesus was a deliberately constructed myth, by a specific group of people with a specific end in mind,”[viii] as David Skrbina wrote recently.
Neither do the faithful ones who believe in the Jesus story want to hear the arguments purporting that the history of Christianity is replete with serial killings of infidels as well as lengthy inter-Christian religious wars. It remains difficult for them to admit that Christianity emerged in Judaism and that until the end of the Second Temple and the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD, all the way till the end of the second century, Christianity was just one of the several infighting Jewish sects in the Roman empire.
Christianity remained Jewish Christianity. As we move into the second century not only certain Christian sects can be described as ‘Jewish-Christian’, but Christianity as a whole can still properly be described as ‘Jewish Christianity’ in a justifiable sense.[ix]
The prominent Christian theologian Adolf Harnack also traces the roots of Christianity to Judaism, claiming that “it was the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple which seems to have provoked the final crisis, and led to complete breach between the two parties.”[x]
The debate on mythical Jewish-inspired origins of Christianity is largely avoided by modern White Christian conservatives and White Christian nationalists. It must be noted though that the most critical analyses of Christianity over the last century and half have not come from the Left, but primarily from conservative and nationalist authors, especially in Germany and France. Particularly in Germany during the National-Socialist regime, from 1933 to 1945, there was a flurry of well-researched books and scholarly pieces by hundreds of academics dealing with the interrelationship between race and religion. Most of those authors contend that there is a causal link between Judaism-Christianity and their modern secular offshoots in the modern myth of Communism and Liberalism
We cannot expect that Christian religion, which originated from Jewish racial heritage, and which today still feels constrained by a baptism commandment issued 2000 years ago in the Jewish land, will atone for the guilt of the German soul.[xi]
It is a great setback that the works by German religious scholars, regardless of the demonic, or rather demonized nature of the National-Socialist epoch when their works were published, have not yet received a proper scholarly evaluation. Nor are the books on the racial makeup of a man, tribe or a people and how it affects the choice of his religion easily accessible. This raises the question of genetic and racial proclivity of any racial ingroup toward accepting or rejecting a foreign religious or political myth. Wilhelm Hauer a prominent religious scholar in National-Socialist Germany, noted:
For one thing, there is no longer any doubt today that race means not only body forms, but also forms of the soul and the spirit. And secondly, religion is not just a matter of the absolute truth, but also of various forms of truth by the bearers of religion.[xii]
Each racial group has its own vision of afterlife including its own notion of truth, or for that matter its acceptance of the big lie. Accordingly, to a large extent it is racial heritage of each man that shapes his world view. Between the German notion of “reality (Wirklichkeit) and “truth” (Wahrheit) there is a sharp distinction that needs to be made.
In addition, it is with great modesty of which Indo-European man is aware: we possess reality while being also possessed by it, but we are eternally on the way to truth, if by this we mean the knowledge of finitude. The absolute truth in the sense of final possession of the deepest mysteries is nonexistent. Such possession would mean the death of the living spirit. [xiii]
Why did early Europeans in the ancient Roman Empire out of hundreds of different cults and sects, each with its own myth, metaphor or allegory, embrace a small Middle Eastern Judaic cult will remain a riddle. Starting with the second century, many Oriental cults had already spread like wildfire in the Roman Empire, cults such as the Persian Mithra cult among Roman soldiers and the Egyptian Isis and Serapis cult, very popular in the high echelons of the Roman imperial court.[xiv] But they did not last long.
Wilhelm Nestle, a German philologist and expert on the mindset of early Greeks and Romans, writes in one of his essays published in the quarterly Archiv für Religionswissenschaft that late Greco-Roman pagan thinkers were “hostile to the idea of the messiah insofar as they recognized in messianic prophesies a presumptuous claim by the Jews to future world domination.”[xv]
Nestle, along with many other German scholars in the first half of the twentieth century voices amazement at how prominent and large European tribes and peoples had fallen prey to a strange Oriental cult preached by a small and insignificant tribe in Judea.
It seems incomprehensible that God did not send the messenger of his revelation to a large and famous people, but to the Jews in a small corner of the Earth, and that despite being omniscient he left his “son” to be shamefully punished by bad people. [xvi]
It does not make much sense to criticize inordinate Jewish political, social, and intellectual influence and popularity, which among other things can still be observed in the writings of a Jewish-born Karl Marx and his modern followers, or modern Jewish neocons dominating the U.S. foreign policy establishment, while at the same time accepting Christian scripts and screeds which were originally written by Jewish prophets. This is a clearcut case of spiritual and political neurosis that the entire West has been victim of over the last 2000 years.
Seen from the secular perspective, the strong an unwavering support of Israel today by the United States is part of the predictable political theology based on the myth of self-chosenness borrowed from the Jewish Old Testament.[xvii] It has served over the last one hundred years as a legal justification for its messianic do-good diplomatic efforts, but also its military engagements all over the world. The mythical “city on the hill,” the “manifest destiny” and the recent launching of “diversity” programs are essentially mythical derivatives from the Bible cloaked in modern languages.
It would be false to ascribe the mythical mindset or the religious mindset to one race or to one group of people only. The myths of the nation and nationalism have plunged European peoples into incessant and bloody civil wars, from Troy to the Thirty Years War, from the American Civil War to World War II and likely to the upcoming Third World War.
Myth, be it bad or good, is not a privilege of any people or race. Some of the sharpest Western minds who detected best the myth of the communist and liberal myths were devout Catholics. We owe much to the early Catholic author Joseph de Maistre who criticized the French Revolution of 1789 and who was among the first to debunk the abstract globalist myth of “human rights.” Also, there are legions of Catholic writers who are critical of liberal modernity, such as J.R.R. Tolkien, G.K. Chesterton, Thomas Molnar and many, many others.
One must also mention a Catholic conservative expert in the international law and a noted political scientist Carl Schmitt, who was very popular in Weimar Germany, National-Socialist Germany and post-World War Germany, and who is now a household name of the New Right and the Alt-Right both in the U.S. and E.U. To him we owe the statement that “all significant concepts of the modern theory of the state are secularized theological concepts.”[xviii]
[xiv] Franz Cumont, Oriental Religions in Roman Paganism (1909 Eugene, OR:Wipfs and Stock Publishers, 2003).
[xv] Wilhelm Nestle, „Die Haupteinwände des antiken Denkens gegen das Christentum“, in Archiv für Religionswissenschaft, Vol. XXXVII, Book 1 (Leipzig: BG Teubner, 1941), p.61
Today, May 27th, 2023, marks the second anniversary of one of the most shocking announcements in modern Canadian history.
On that date, the Tk’emlúps te Secwépemc (Kamloops Indian Band) issued a press release claiming that the “remains” of 215 students who had attended the reserve’s Indian Residential School (IRS) between 1890 and 1978 were discovered using ground-penetrating radar (GPR).
This gruesome finding grounded in “a knowing in our community that we were able to verify” of the cemetery’s existence instantly became sensational headline news bordering on moral panic, worldwide. The press release also claimed “At this time we have more questions than answers.” This admission did not stop most media and indigenous activists from proposing more “case closed” answers than questions.
Across Canada, the meagre preliminary information given was more than enough to provoke mournful vigils, solidarity speeches, emotional testimonials from former IRS students, self-flagellation by politicians, flags on government buildings lowered to half-mast for six months, statues of former Canadian heroes defaced, destroyed, toppled, or removed, demands for the renaming of streets and public schools, calls for yet another papal apology, and the destruction, vandalism or desecration of some 70 mainly Roman Catholic and Anglican Churches on and off indigenous reserves.
But two years later, there are even more questions than answers. Why was this presumptive cemetery considered to be different from hundreds of non-indigenous burying grounds like it all across the land — missing, neglected, or unknown for generations — but subject to little or no reporting? Why was so much emphasis given to the results of the inconclusive technique called GPR? Why are new GPR searches planned for the same reserve when the details of the previous one are still a closely guarded secret? Why was the analysis headed by Sarah Beaulieu, a lowly sessional instructor at the University of the Fraser Valley, an institution nobody has ever heard of, given top priority when there were other better sources of information available? Why has the site still not been excavated to uncover the physical remains? Why did no journalist except one from Rebel News bother to visit the site to carry out an independent investigation? And why was the potentially fallible oral history “knowings” of indigenous knowledge keepers privileged over historical records located in school, church, and public archives?
Close to the eve of the first anniversary of this discovery, the Kamloops media-savvy leadership organized a 14-hour commemoration ceremony. Tellingly, no observance seems planned for the second anniversary, at least according to the Band’s media site. Why not?
None of these questions has even been asked, let alone answered, by the Kamloops band. Yes, it was confirmed four days after the press release that the band was “engaging with the coroner,” but this has gone nowhere. Yes, there was also early talk about exhuming the graves, but this has never happened. As for the site being treated as a crime scene, the RCMP said it opened a file on the case. Still, there is no ongoing investigation, suggesting that no murders are believed to have occurred at the school despite decades of rumours suggesting otherwise.
The lack of progress on exhumation is said to reflect the assertion since indigenous burying grounds are sacred places, only indigenous people should be involved in reserve mortuary issues despite all funding for such efforts coming from Canada’s taxpayers.
But sacredness also applies to the cemeteries of other ethnic and racial groups along with the need to account for public spending, so this assertion smacks of special privilege.
Its lack of credibility is also challenged by the fact that pre-contact west coast burials involved placing the remains in garbage middens, earthen mounds, stone cairns, or above ground on platforms or in trees. Given the mobile nature of West Coast foraging groups, many of these locales were soon forgotten.
Only after accepting Christianity following close contact with the European missionaries did aboriginal peoples adopt all Western funerary practices save careful maintenance and regular visits to graveyards, as can be seen from the many neglected and unmarked band cemeteries across Canada, occasionally resulting in the desecration and destruction of old burials when new ones are attempted. Moreover, given that allegations of murder, even genocide, occurring at the Kamloops IRS have been bandied about for decades, it is passing strange why the band would resist a forensic examination of the alleged graves.
Conversely, if these were fresh burials based on firsthand witness accounts, is there any doubt that the band would have immediately demanded the RCMP carry out a thorough examination, the alleged sacredness of the area be damned?
Precisely this demand is now occurring in Winnipeg with indigenous family members, leaders, activists, and media loudly demanding for months that a detailed search of the four-acre Winnipeg Prairie Green private landfill where the bodies of Morgan Harris, 39, and Marcedes Myran, 26, two missing indigenous women, are suspected of having been recently buried. Both are presumed to be victims of the same attacker. The search demanded would take three years and could cost perhaps as much as $184 million. (The effort would also present substantial risks for potential searchers given the hazardous materials buried in that location.)
By way of contrast, why have Kamloops band officials and residents not demanded even a minimally invasive investigation technique like “core sampling” at the presumptive burial site to quickly, safely, respectfully, and conclusively determine the contents of a single inconclusive radar hit?
Could the answer be that Kamloops officials fear that these GPR-detected soil disturbances don’t represent the presence of any human remains?
Of all the unknowns and dubious excuses for them at Kamloops, perhaps the paramount one is hardly mentioned: the relationship between the unnamed children said to be buried in these graves and the named students claimed to be missing. These two issues have been conflated, deliberately or not, by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) charged with documenting the history, operation, and legacy of the Indian Residential Schools and its successor, the National Centre for Truth and Reconciliation (NCTR).
The TRC opined early on that many indigenous children sent to residential schools never returned to their home communities. Some children ran away, and others died at the schools. The students who did not return are called the Missing Children. The Missing Children Project documented the deaths and burial places of children who died while attending the schools by placing their names in a Memorial Register. To date, 4,115 mainly named children who died while attending a residential school — but not necessarily at the school itself — have been identified. It is unclear whether the NCTR considers the unnamed children said to be buried in GPR-located graves part of this number. They should not, if only because they are undocumented and unidentified.
Elementary logic supports this assertion: how can the soil anomalies, the only sign of burials detected by GPR, be called “the remains of missing children” when there are no proven human remains. And unnamed and unknown children cannot be called missing when they are known to be dead, and dead people buried in graves are not missing but simply dead.
Logic also suggests that it is reasonable to hypothesize that Kamloops band officials are reluctant to dig up the abandoned apple orchard beside the long-shuttered school where these children are said to be buried because they fear no bodies — “missing” or not — will be found. The three excavations already undertaken — the Shubenacadie IRS, the Battleford Industrial School, and the Camsell Hospital site — have either produced negative results, confirmed that the bodies found were properly buried IRS students, or predated the IRS system.
Seen from the perspective of the Kamloops band, it might be far more prudent to keep this an enduring mystery rather than risk being exposed as supporting what some have called the great Canadian burial hoax.
To address the link between the putative gravesites and Memorial Register requires the transfer of attention from official mainstream-sanctioned unknowns to the growing body of unofficial but thoroughly documented evidence gathered since June 2021. None of this contrarian data, carefully collected, compiled, and published by impartial investigators with no financial or other stake in keeping the story of thousands of “missing children” alive supports the legacy media and political narratives.
Data for the dozens of IRSs with students listed as missing was painstakingly collected by intrepid researcher Nina Green. They prove that most of the 51 students missing from the Kamloops IRS were buried in named cemeteries on their home reserves. Accordingly, few could have been buried in some “secret cemetery” in a former apple orchard, leaving the identity and fate of the others a mystery.
Green communicated all these data months ago to the relevant parties: the media, provincial and federal politicians, indigenous leaders and activists, and academics focusing on aboriginal issues. Only a couple bothered to acknowledge receipt of this critical material.
So, who or what is buried in the apple orchard?
“Who” could be people who died before the school opened in 1890 since no missing children were listed for the following period. It is surely conceivable that some of these pre-1890 corpses may have been murder victims, but there is no authenticated case of a homicide at the IRS during its entire 88-year history. Not one.
As for the accusation that murdered children were buried in the apple orchard in the dead of night, elementary logic — as opposed to indigenous folktales — again says that this was inconceivable. The school is not in some remote part of the province; it has always employed band members; the apple orchard is located within eyesight just across the river from the city of Kamloops; and the school always saw a daily stream of visiting parents and dignitaries, tradespeople, school inspectors, and other parties. How could 215 children have been secretly buried with the whole of Kamloops and the entire Kamloops Band turning a blind eye?
“What” is undoubtedly the likely determiner. It suggests that the remains of dead animals, neatly-spaced apple tree stumps, and debris from various construction projects, including the laying of sewage tiles in the late 1930s in the exact place that newly-placed burial markers now appear, are what was revealed by the GPR probe.
There is other indirect evidence as well. No named indigenous relatives on the Kamloops reserve or elsewhere in Canada are frantically looking for a named but missing IRS child. This is because all students required signed applications to attend the IRS schools and were minutely followed in Quarterly Reports from entry to exit. Without such records, the schools could not receive operating funds from the Department of Indian Affairs.
Thousands more “missing children” could easily be found where their final resting place is bureaucratically buried, namely in carefully preserved school, church, and government records. This would only happen if the relevant parties —indigenous activists, band leaders, and family members — showed interest in them.
So far, these parties prefer to support fruitless GPR studies that have not turned up a single “missing” body, evidence they are pursuing a far different agenda, one rooted in the mantra “At this time we have more questions than answers.”
Guest columnist Hymie Rubenstein is editor of The REAL Indigenous Issues Newsletter and a retired professor of anthropology, University of Manitoba.
: The North American immigrant invasion is much worse than a Disease Invasion
Hello Alberta, Canada (and the World) The photo below illustrates clearly an illegal immigrant invasion of North America! This will become much more that a “disease invasion” when these illegal immigrants become embedded in North American cities and towns, encouraged to become members of the criminal BLM and Antifa savages, part of the cultural revolution promoted by the leftist Biden and Trudeau governments! (Many of these illegals carry weapons and the majority of the men are of fighting age, suggesting this could become much more than a disease invasion).
The world will recall that violence began during the onslaught of immigrants into the European Union several years ago when murders, robberies and rapes began and continue to this day. North Americans thought this could not happen here, but crime has increased dramatically all across North American cities as a direct result of the push to defund police by leftist governments. This is increasing in cities like Calgary, that has a woke Communist Mayor and violence has only increased. Examples include the early prison release of Al Qaeda terrorist Hiva Alizadeh because he “promised to abandon terrorism”?
Since September 2022, 10 Canadian police officers have been killed, 9 of them murdered! This cultural change has been in progress for years with the insidious infiltration of Marxist thought in North Americas institutions, educational systems, law firms, labour unions and political parties. This immorality is even occurring in conservative Alberta as the NDP are only one step away from becoming part of what will eventually become Trudeau’s Communist Canada.
Beyond Communism, JFK warned us of what could become a one world globalist government that if successful, will include Communist China, the World Economic Forum and the United Nations with it’s International Organization for Migration (IMO), offices open all over the world today. It should come as no surprise that JFK was assassinated. President Kennedy warned us that a Globalist World Order was upon us and has been growing since the 1970’s.
Canada was introduced to Communism after Justin’s father was elected in ’68 and dined with Mao in ‘73. The proof is in the way Justin is continuing the Trudeau “publicly spoken” reverence for the Chinese Communist style of government.
He told us his plans during the 2015 election campaign; that he was going to make Canada “a post-national country” implying quite correctly if anyone had been listening; that white men need not apply. He is proving his point with his treasonous actions encouraging anyone and everyone who wishes to cross north American borders almost uncontested. (This is the direct use of migration as a politicized weapon of cultural change)! Canadians should remember Trudeau sarcastically saying, “The very concept of a nation founded by European settlers is offensive to me. Old stock white Canadians are an unpleasant relic and quite frankly replaceable, and we will replace them”. What’s left of Canada (and America), have become colonies of Communist China with Trudeau (and Biden’s) open border’s, with these new “bought and paid for Communist voters” coming in droves. Get ready North America! See attached. L. Leugner CD, Warrant Officer (Ret’d), Member, Veterans4Freedom, Cochrane Alberta.
For your information, Immigration Watch Canada sends you our latest bulletin : “Mass immigration is largest contributor to Canada’s population growth and GHG emissions “. If we ignore the dramatic and very negative environmental impact of mass immigration,all our efforts to deal with climate change will fail.”
WHICH IS WORSE?
Mass Immigration
Refining Oil
Mass immigration is largest contributor to Canada’s population growth and GHG emissions
Did you know that Canadians are among the highest per capita producers of climate changing carbon emissions in the world?! Per person, we release more than 3 times the world average! Our high consumption of fossil fuels is because of: – The large vehicles we drive and the distance we drive them – Poor public transit – Large houses – High material consumption – Travel – Cold climate – Our resource intensive economy The Kyoto Accord covered greenhouse gas emissions from 1990 to 2012. Of the 58 signatories, Canada posted the second worst record, with emissions actually increasing by 21% instead of being reduced by 6%.
The fact that Canada came in 27% over its target speaks to the complete lack of science and clear national policy to guide GHG (green house gas) reduction in this country. The common consensus of what caused this massive overshoot is that the oil sands are to blame. Oil sands emissions have increased dramatically and perfectly fit the profile of a well-rounded environmental disaster so it is easy to understand why people have looked no further for any other source.
But oil sands emissions only account for 70 mega tons of the 156 megatonnes that Canada’s emissions went up from 1990 to 2012. Additionally, Ontario saw a reduction of 30 megatonnes by replacing coal-fired electrical generators with natural gas generators.
So, in effect, the combined increases in GHG emissions totaled 186 megatonnes. Subtracting the oil sands contributions leaves 116 megatonnes unaccounted for.
So what are these ‘Mystery Emissions’?? Governments don’t mention them or account for them in their forecasts. Media corporations won’t mention them by name.
Here’s the thing. Each year every Canadian emits over 20 tons of GHG’s. From 1990 to 2012, Canada’s population increased by over 6 million people, the vast majority of which was caused by mass immigration. The increase of 6 million people multiplied by their 20 ton emissions equals 120 megatonnes and accounts very well for the 116 megatonnes of ‘Mystery emissions”.
The main source of Canada’s dismal carbon emissions record is clear. The “Mystery emissions” result from population growth due to immigration and childbirth. The carbon footprint of immigrants into Canada increases by a factor of over 4 when they arrive here. And for some source countries it is over 15.
Canada simply can’t meet its emission reduction responsibilities with mass immigration still taking place.
Mass immigration is the largest contributor to our growth and GHG emissions. The real mystery is why no government agency or media is talking about it.
Canada cannot continue to miss its GHG emissions targets and remain in the dark as to why. We must have a full accounting of all sources if we are to have a realistic chance of meeting our responsibilities to the international community and to future generations.
Our institutions must stop stonewalling on the impacts of population growth whether it stems from mass immigration or domestic birth rates.
If we don’t have the full picture, how can we deliver lasting solutions? +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Below is a link to a youtube video by “Canadians for a Sustainable Society” on the “mystery” emissions generated by immigration. To view, click on the link and then on the arrow. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uepVUS9IyI&t=25s
For sensible immigration policies for the 21st century.
John Ivison: Some ‘refugees’ have found a way to exploit Canada’s generous immigration system
Few people get as upset about the manipulation of the citizenship process as those who have gone through it themselves and played by the rules Get the latest from John Ivison straight to your inbox Author of the article: John Ivison Published May 17, 2023 • Last updated 15 hours ago • 4 minute read 276 Comments
TOPSHOT – People board a mini-bus as they evacuate southern Khartoum, on May 14, 2023. War in Sudan has created genuine refugees but some other Sudanese appear to be making false claims in an attempt to gain Canadian citizenship. Photo by AFP via Getty Images
OTTAWA — Sudanese people crossing the border from the U.S. to make fraudulent refugee claims are like “a trail of ants” who view Canada as a “the picnic table.”
That’s the view of Mariam, a Sudanese-Canadian, who is affronted that her fellow citizens would abuse this country’s generous immigration system.
Few people get as upset about the manipulation of the citizenship process as those who have gone through it themselves and played by the rules.
Mariam (not her real name: she was granted anonymity to protect her from any recrimination) contacted the Post after a story last week revealed that a number of Canadian citizens being processed after evacuation from war-torn Sudan had previously been granted refugee status in Canada, yet had returned to the country they claimed had persecuted them.
In the wake of that evacuation, Ottawa introduced measures to allow immediate family members of those who left Sudan to be fast-tracked into Canada free of charge. Processing staff were “encouraged to be flexible” and “err on the side of facilitation” when dealing with applications. Join the conversation JOIN THE CONVERSATION Have your say. Leave a comment and tell us what you think. Read All 276 Comments
Mariam said the new measures went viral — “it was like a bomb going off on social media” — as Sudanese expatriates around the world were misled by unscrupulous agents to believe that Canada had flung open its doors to all Sudanese citizens.
One Facebook influencer with 11,000 followers urged them to apply for Canadian citizenship, claiming all Sudanese citizens are eligible.
Facebook posts instructing Sudanese citizens how to apply for Canadian citizenship. Photo by Yoya Ahmed/Facebook
Ottawa has not helped itself. The portal accepting applications allows applicants to reach the point where they are permitted to submit biometric information, even though the form states clearly in English that eligibility is limited to spouses and dependent children. Immigration, Refugee and Citizenship Canada said it did not have statistics on how many new applications it has received.
But the likely upshot is that delays for legitimate applicants from Sudan have been extended.
Mariam said the war in her homeland has created genuine refugees but that many of those already in Canada claimed fraudulently that they were escaping persecution in Darfur, a region in western Sudan that has experienced ethnic conflict since 2003. In fact, she said many claimants were members of the party led by Omar al-Bashir, Sudan’s head of state between 1989 and 2019, who oversaw the war in Darfur and was accused of crimes against humanity there. He was deposed in a coup d’etat four years ago. “Many came here claiming to be opponents when they were really the oppressors,” Mariam said.
Canada has long been known as a soft target, with strong pull factors like generous benefits.
Mariam said she and her friends are ashamed at the behaviour of many Sudanese refugees. She laid out a “road-map” that typically involves living in a Gulf state, building a good travel history and then applying for a U.S. tourist visa, having already shipped treasured items to Canada. Once in the U.S., she said many head north to access Canada’s more generous welfare and child benefit regimes. One particular dodge involves applying for a special diet disability in Ontario. “The goal is to get as much free money as possible,” she said. “Once you are granted citizenship, you go back to the Gulf.”
She contrasted that with the route travelled by permanent resident applicants, who have to take a language test, save as much as possible and then “wait forever,” unable to make plans for family, school or vacations.
Once in Canada, you “live a simple life and forget about credentials or jobs held before arriving in Canada.” But above all, you work. “I would rather sell my kidney than live on social benefits,” Mariam said.
Canada has retained support for mass immigration, largely because economic migrants remain the majority (if you include the dependents of the applicant in that category) and because it is generally considered to be fair. Canada admitted 260,000 immigrants in 2014, the last full year of the Harper government, a number that is expected to rise to 451,000 in 2024. The Conservatives kept the percentage of refugees below 10 per cent, while the Liberals have expanded that number to around 14 per cent.
Yet a broad consensus still exists, outside Quebec at least, that immigration is a good thing, as long as it is based on economics and fairness.
That integrity is undermined by stories like Mariam’s.
She said her experience of Canada’s system being milked is not limited to Sudanese nationals. As an Arabic speaker, she volunteered to help Syrian refugees settle in Canada. She said nine of the 25 families she worked with had not lived in Syria for many years and, consequently, were not genuine refugees.
But she said many Sudanese have figured out how to exploit the system, including returning to their home country by flying to Egypt or Ethiopia and crossing into Sudan over land. That information is shared on Facebook and What’s App groups.
She said such behaviour unfairly stigmatizes people like herself and her family.
“My father couldn’t find work in Canada, so he worked in the U.S., saved up and went back to school, while working as a security guard at night. My mother studied, even with five kids. When we came here, we followed the rules,” she said. “If you’re capable, contribute to your country and your community.”
A number of Canadians have previously had doubts about openly opposing Trudeau’s relentless immigration intake. But they should not have any doubts now. His latest words should change their minds : Trudeau has just announced an aggressive plan to bring in 500,000 immigrants a year by 2025.
Let us repeat : Trudeau plans to increase Canada’s immigration intake to 500,000 per year !! And he seems to think that he can get away with this outrageous plan.
His intake has been increasing every year for the past few years. It is already over 400,000. No logical reason has ever been given for such high numbers. The “Aging population” argument was refuted many years ago. The “Worker shortage” argument is probably the latest version of a sick cheap labour plan or an outright lie.
If Canada had journalists who had not been outrageously bought off by Trudeau, Canadians would have the detailed information to dismiss immigration industry arguments.
Trudeau’s 500,000 intake proposal is obviously the worst of all the stupid things he has done. As insane as it sounds, it is clearly more of Trudeau’s overall plan to have immigrants outnumber Canada’s current European-based population and make it a minority.
At the very beginning of Trudeau’s reign in 2015, he revealed his clear anti-Canada mindset. Trying to sound intellectual and capable of the analysis he is obviously incapable of performing, he described Canada as a “post-national state” with no clear identity”. Most Canadians concluded that he was a fool. Many concluded that he was obviously very hostile to Canada and that he intended to undermine and destroy Canada. Since then, he has taken many immigration and other measures to achieve that goal and erase completely the traditional identity of Canada.
The fact is that is that Canada’s European-descended majority population had long ago succeeded in making Canada one of the most successful countries in the world over the past 150 years. In fact, Canada was universally envied for its success.Foreigners wanted to come here to be part of the success. Now, Trudeau is importing huge numbers of immigrants who have actually announced that they are hostile to Canada and want to re-create here the politically corrupt cesspools they came from.
It is no exaggeration to say that allowing such people into Canada is very dangerous. It is also no exaggeration to say that allowing such people in may ultimately lead to civil war and to a national breakdown. For his actions, Trudeau at the very least would have been put on trial in most parts of the world. . There is also no doubt that he would have been sentenced to life in prison for treason. In fact, in many other parts of the world, he would have been quickly executed for treason.
For his contempt for Canada and especially its European-based population, Trudeau is already despised by a significant part of Canada’s population. His latest announcement should leave no doubt that he is a shameless and despicable traitor. He has obviously betrayed Canada’s majority population. Strong measures have to be taken to stop him from going any further . In most countries of the world, there are laws against treason. Even Canada has such a law. In fact, in the next few months, Canadian judges will have to sentence a Canadian military officer who has been convicted of treason. His crime was selling Canadian military secrets to Russia. Canadians should pay careful attention to the sentence that judges give to that man.
Why? Trudeau’s crime is infinitely worse : Trudeau is promoting the overwhelming of Canada’s majority population and the sale of Canada to groups that are openly hostile to the very existence of all Canadians.
Trudeau has to be stopped immediately. The immigration idiocy he has already committed has to be corrected immediately. His latest idiotic announcement has to be withdrawn immediately
If Parliament were doing its job, it would have long ago reined in Trudeau at many points in the past few years. However, not a single MP has objected to any of the immigration actions that Trudeau has performed so far. (Sikh Heritage Month is one of the exceptionally stupid.) If Parliament repeats its behaviour of the past five years, it will not oppose Trudeau’s 500,000 proposal. If that happens,Canadians can justifiably conclude that Canada’s MP’s are a useless collection of deadbeats.
In Many countries, most of them would have been thrown out of the building that housed them. In a significant number of countries, the building and its occupants would have been declared useless, bombed and the wounded traitors left to rot.
Sounds appropriate for this latest mess in Canada, doesn’t it?
https://thedailykenn.blogspot.com/2023/05/one-year-after-buffalo-grocery-massacre.html On May 14, 2022, an unhinged white teen barged into a Buffalo, NY grocery store and opened fire. His stated goal was to kill as many blacks as possible. 18-year-old Payton S. Gendron was convicted of killing ten. Nine were black. In the subsequent year, we documented about 450 white victims of black crime. That’s about nine white victims each week. Think of it as a slow-burn massacre or consider it a weekly replay of the Buffalo massacre.
Wdio.com published an article titled, ‘A year after Buffalo supermarket massacre, city’s Black youth still shaken’. Attributed to Carolyn Thompson and The Associated Press, the tear-jerking prose relays the story of a 16-year-old boy who fears a stroll in the park. What the woke media overlooks is the number of black-on-black homicides that have been committed in Buffalo.
“In 2022, there were 70 homicides in the City of Buffalo,” according to the Buffalo police department. That is far and above the annual average of 54 homicides. If you care to view the faces of Buffalo’s homicide victims, go to gunmemorial.com and enter the search term ‘Buffalo NY’. The results will render this heart-wrenching revelation: Nearly all homicide victims were black.
So what is happening in Buffalo? Are there unhinged white supremacists running amok? Or is the city a typical American urban jungle where violent black crime is as common as decaying houses and street economies built almost exclusively on drug trafficking? The national media is largely ignoring black-on-white homicides and black-on-black homicides. It appears the only lives that matter to the media are those who’s deaths can be exploited to advance a far-left agenda.
