Dear Wab
Nahanni Fontaine. We’ve heard about the recent behavior of this individual, a Minister of Families – of all positions. Before providing some views on Fontaine and her position below, I ask this – which families are or were Nahanni Fontaine representing?
Nahanni Fontaine cruelly disparaged another person in the public realm – Mr. Charlie Kirk, a practicing conservative. Before his sudden and very public murder, Charlie Kirk was a family advocate and family man, being married with children, and providing undisputable reasons for others to do likewise – pairbond and raise the next generation.
Nahanni did not personally know, nor even understand the positions Charlie maintained, but maliciously slandered a murdered man with vacuous disparagement.
We see this immediately below:
“A racist, xenophobic, transphobic, islamophobic, sexist, white nationalist mouthpiece…inciting hatred in this country”. Is Fontaine suggesting that Kirk was inciting hatred in Manitoba, in Canada? How? Does Fontaine even know how? Does Fontaine even understand what she writes? Many think not.
My takeaway from this rant is that Fontaine knows not of what she is talking about by using trendy verbiage to describe the background of in-depth understanding of a multitude of issues that Kirk sought to address publicly.
Is Member of the Legislative Assembly of Manitoba Nahanni Fontaine, and the caucus she represents, suggesting that we should not discuss the issues that newly murdered Charlie Kirk tried to publicly address?
It appears that Fontaine herself, and maybe even the Manitoba NDP Caucus itself, would seriously wish to limit any serious discussion on social issues that Kirk himself wished to address, issues that also have impact upon the people of Manitoba. Fontaine provided the people of Manitoba with hate filled vile unproven rhetoric and invective upon a newly murdered man. A murdered man. Murdered in full recorded public viewing. Yet disparaged with contemptuous maliciousness.
Charlie Kirk brought public discussion to issues that provincial, state and federal governments in the U.S. and Canada forced upon the public – without much of any discussion between “the government” and the citizens of Canada and the U.S.
Kirk engaged people in real debate and discussion over issues that Fontaine herself shows little in the way of understanding. The personally inhumane invective toward Charlie Kirk from an appointed representative Manitoba will not sit well with many many people.
In written form seen above, the behavior of Nahanni Fontaine is well beyond the realm of understanding past and current issues and concerns facing both Canadians and Americans alike. Fontaine’s egregiously contemptuous behavior is well beyond suitable for a member of a member of a Legislative Assembly in Manitoba. People across North America are now questioning Nahanni Fontaine’s development as a person.
I have offered direction to you to have Nahanni Fontaine removed from the NDP Caucus, and the Manitoba Legislative Assembly. If her constituents of St. Johns, and the NDP Caucus continue to support her in upcoming business pertaining to Manitobans, it will reflect to the public what all three individual and combined entities are to the public.
Yours Truly
Michael a. brentnall
WINNIPEG