[Demographer Jerry comments on Maxime’s call: “The Liberal Party’s immigration policy is GENOCIDE for White Canadians. The Liberal Party is hell bent on the extermination of True Canadians. The woke genocidal policy of the rulers of Canada plan this underhanded genocide of Canadians by abortion and alien immigration, while inventing new laws to prosecute all Canadian Patriots who dare to fight back.]
Trudeau’s mass immigration policy is completely out of control!
Statistics Canada announced this week that our country’s population has gone up by another million – after only nine months!
And no, it’s not because Canadian woman have suddenly started having babies.
Almost all of this growth is due to the arrival of permanent and temporary residents.
When the Liberals took power in 2015, Canada’s population was only 35 million.
How can we possibly integrate into our society, our economy, our housing market, our culture, the equivalent of Nova Scotia’s, or Saskatchewan’s population every few months?!?
It’s a planned invasion. It’s a total disaster in the making.
I started talking about the perils of mass immigration years ago.
The whole political and media establishment denounced me, smeared me, said I was a racist, a xenophobe, anti-Canadian.
But I kept telling the truth, because I care more about the future of our nation than about what these corrupt elites think of me.
More and more people now realize that I was right.
We need to make mass immigration the ballot box question at the coming election.
The only one party you can trust to keep on raising this issue, come hell or high water, is the PPC.
There’s only 36 hours left to reach our goal of raising $250,000 during the first quarter.
Anger at Church archdeacon’s call for ‘anti-whiteness’
Hayley Dixon
Sun, March 24, 2024 at 1:07 PM EDT·4 min read
The Ven Miranda Threlfall-Holmes insisted she was ‘not anti-white’
A Church of England archdeacon has called for “anti-whiteness”, in comments which have been criticised as divisive.
The Ven Miranda Threlfall-Holmes, Archdeacon of Liverpool, also called for people to “smash the patriarchy” but insisted her comments were “not anti-white, or anti-men”.
Her statement prompted an angry reaction, with one person asking if it would be “safe to attend church” if Dr Threlfall-Holmes “holds racial prejudice against white people”.
Dr Threlfall-Holmes wrote on X, formerly Twitter: “I went to a conference on whiteness last autumn. It was very good, very interesting and made me realise: whiteness is to race as patriarchy is to gender.
“So yes, let’s have anti-whiteness, and let’s smash the patriarchy. That’s not anti-white, or anti-men, it’s anti-oppression.”
In response, users of X suggested that if the Cambridge-educated priest wanted “anti-whiteness” then she should “lead by example and resign”.
Some described her comments as “racist” and one asked: “Why do you seek to divide when your job description is literally to bring people together?”
Her words were criticised as “divisive” and “nonsensical” and one user said it would appear she had “given up Christianity to join a new and sinister cult”.
Dr Threlfall-Holmes, who was appointed archdeacon last year, also holds a role advising church leaders on implanting safeguarding reforms.
Last October she revealed she was attending a conference on “waking up to and addressing whiteness in the Anglican church”.
The day-long “Racial Justice Conference” in Birmingham was organised by Reconciliation Initiatives, a charity working in partnership with Coventry Cathedral to help churches “contribute to reconciliation in wider society”.
The aims of the conference included: “To encourage white participants to take next steps in facing their own whiteness, and in addressing institutional racism within Anglican churches and provinces.”
The charity also runs a four-week “Being White” course aimed at clergy and lay members who “identify racially as white” to help them address “the ways we are caught up in a system of white superiority and white advantage in UK society”.
‘A way of viewing the world’
When asked about the apparent contradictions in her comments, Dr Threlfall-Holmes told The Telegraph: “I was contributing to a debate about world views, in which ‘whiteness’ does not refer to skin colour per se, but to a way of viewing the world where being white is seen as ‘normal’ and everything else is considered different or lesser.”
Dr Threlfall-Holmes, a historian, added: “I do however understand that this is not a definition that is widely shared as yet outside of academic circles, and regret that Twitter [X] was perhaps not the best place for a nuanced argument.”
She praised the comments of the Bishop of Birmingham, the Rt Revd Dr Michael Volland, who last week defended the decision of his diocese to oppose a “deconstructing whiteness” officer on the basis that the phrase can be “misleading” and “has nothing to do with knocking or demeaning people who have white skin”.
The Rev Dr Ian Paul, who is a member of the General Synod and the Archbishops’ Council, has warned that “importing” such language from the culture wars in the US risks “alienating ordinary members of the Church of England”.
I went to the KEG MANSION for a steak dinner, to celebrate my birthday. I’ve been going in there for the 25 years I went to the part of the KEG MANSION where I like to sit,, AT THE UPSTAIRS BAR. The BARTENDERESS/ waitress is rather LIBERAL, is wearing a skimpy TANK TOP and wall to wall TATTOOS, introduces herself, I said “tonight is my birthday, I have been coming in here for 30 years”. She said “we are out of prime rib”.. I said said “that is Ok I will have SIRLION, and an BTW, I don’t approve of MEN DRESSED AS WOMEN”… ( The MALE FLAMING FAG bartender / waiter beside her is sporting a skimpy TANK TOP, WOMEN’s PONY TAIL AND WOMEN’s MAKEUP AND EYELINER). Of course , 5 – 10 minutes later after the staff had their little “conference” This bull dyke manager comes up to me as I am trying to listen to my headphones and watch you tube/
Starts reading me the “RIOT ACT” She says :”We don’t tolerate such speech here .”
I said “look it is FREE SPEECH, OKAY, and I am a 25 year customer” ” It is your premises, if you don’t want me here, I will leave”. “You are cutting off a 30 customer over your politics” I walked out. The creature had to follow me. I WILL NEVER GO BACK THERE AS LONG AS I LIVE
tuck to my guns.. I DONT NEED TO SEE A FLAMING, CROSS DRESSING FAG IN MY FACE.. NOT WHEN I AM PAYING… FAG COULD HAVE TONED DOWN HIS DRESS. BUT NOO, THEY HAVE TO PUSH IT, So, I went to the ANOTHER PUB had the 6 oz steak sandwich and fries.
Xiangguo Qiu’s ouster from the National Microbiology Laboratory in 2019 remained cloaked in mystery until a few days ago. Photo by MCpl Vincent Carbonneau, Rideau Hall/File
Article content
In shutting down an ethics committee probe into just how it came to pass that two Beijing-linked scientists managed to get away with dangerously compromising security at the National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg, at least the Trudeau government is being consistent.
Ever since coming to power in 2015, the Liberals have chosen to hide the scope and extent of Beijing’s ever-expanding influence, interference and infiltration operations in Canada. By acts of obstruction, distraction and filibuster, the pattern is by now easily predictable. There’s nothing surprising about it anymore. The pattern played out exactly as you would imagine in the Winnipeg lab case.
In their zeal to keep the public in the dark about the goings-on at the top-security national infections diseases laboratory, the Liberals went to extraordinary lengths, not least an historic defiance of the convention of Parliamentary supremacy to the point of mounting a court challenge to thwart an order from the Speaker of the House of Commons to release documents relating to the affair.
It was only because a panel of judges eventually found that contrary to the Trudeau government’s claims about the too-sensitive nature of the documents — 600 pages in all — the barricade it built was mostly to protect itself from public embarrassment.
And it was only by releasing those documents that Canadians were permitted last week to learn that four years ago, the Canadian Security and Intelligence Service had determined that research scientist Xiangguo Qiu, a Public Health Canada employee at the lab, had been engaging in clandestine activity to the benefit of Xi Jinping’s regime by secretly sending scientific findings and materials to China.
As far back as 2018, Qiu’s husband Keding Cheng, also a Public Health Canada employee, was found to have allowed access to the Canadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health by students he was supposed to be supervising. The students were observed trying to remove laboratory materials. Until they were both fired in 2021, Qiu and Cheng routinely violated security protocols and ethical conduct codes, and consistently lied about their unauthorized intimacies with sketchy Chinese state institutions and agencies.
CSIS determined that Cheng was stubbornly untruthful when subjected to questioning, and his responses to CSIS queries were “simply not credible, which reflects adversely on his personal trustworthiness and therefore his basic reliability, the primary building block of security clearance.” As for Qiu, her disregard for basic security protocols posed “a very serious and credible danger to the government of Canada as a whole,” CSIS found.
Just how these two managed to acquire security clearances in the first place is just one question that remains unanswered.
You’d think the Trudeau government would want the public to be well aware of this scandal, illustrating as it does the extreme national-security peril involved in any collaboration with the shadowy world of Chinese state agencies. These collaborations pose a threat to Canada’s national interests that Ottawa claims it wants Canadians — particularly Canadian scientists and university researchers — to better understand, and to guard against.
Instead, the Liberal government persists even now in keeping the public in the dark, by way of teaming with the New Democrats to roadblock an ethics committee probe into the Winnipeg lab affair.
It was only because of its minority position in the House of Commons back in 2019 that the Liberals failed in their efforts to block the establishment of a special standing committee to inquire into the weirdly opaque Canada-China relationship that Trudeau had cultivated and nurtured in the lead-up to Beijing’s hostage-diplomacy abduction of Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor.
Until then, the matter of Beijing’s vastly expanding shadow over Liberal fundraising, candidate-selection, trade policy and diplomatic priorities was held to be best left to the “experts” from Dominic Barton’s disgraced McKinsey empire and the palm-greasers at the Canada-China Business Council. The pattern seemed to break, but the Canada-China relations committee quickly found itself mired in gridlocks by Liberal members determined to turn the subject back to more parochial matters, and to make excuses based on the presumed implications for the Kovrig-Spavor kidnapping, and to level insinuations that it was “racist” merely to inquire too closely into Beijing’s proxies and their rumoured election shenanigans.
It took years of Liberal ambuscades and transparently bogus pretexts before Canada’s Five Eyes partners finally managed to arm-twist Ottawa to get with the program and at least bar China’s “national champion” telecom Huawei from the core structure of Canada’s fifth-generation (5G) internet rollout.
It took several months of explosive revelations about warnings from CSIS and other agencies to the effect that Beijing really was actively involved in monkey wrenching the 2019 and 2021 federal elections to the Liberals’ benefit before Trudeau decided for appearances’ sake to conjure something to impede calls for a public inquiry. The gambit was a “independent special rapporteur” whitewash undertaken by David Johnston, an old Trudeau family friend, and an especially solicitous and high-profile Canadian friend of China.
When that didn’t work, faced with the demands of several majority votes in the House of Commons, Team Trudeau managed to construct a public inquiry that so far shows every sign that it will extend as much in the way of protection to Beijing’s Liberal-friendly mandarin bloc proxies in Canada as to the Uyghurs, Hong Kongers, expatriate Chinese democrats and Falun Gong practitioners those same well-to-do proxies have been bullying, browbeating and intimidating all these years.
So best of luck to any Parliamentarians who would want an Ethics Committee probe or any other such open inquiry into how the hell the National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg ended up a sieve of intellectual-property patents for Beijing’s benefit, and an open buffet for Beijing’s ravenous appetite for top-secret information about infectious diseases.
Any such initiative would allow Canadians to know things the Liberal government does not want any of us to know, and the pattern with these things is so predictable it’s becoming downright boring.
Maxime Bernier Calls for Massive Immigration Cut to Help Save Canada’s Economy
Finance minister Chrystia Freeland is set to announce more irresponsible spending in her spring budget next month.
The Liberals will once again claim they’re doing this to help the middle class, and they will brag about being generous with our money.
But of course, they won’t be telling us how much more debt and future taxes this will bring.
And yet, we all know there’s a cheap, quick, and easy way to fix our most important economic problems:
Drastically cut the number of people entering Canada.
-It would lower demand for housing and allow construction to catch up and prices to go down.
-It would reduce pressure on healthcare, education, and other social services.
-It would lower business reliance on cheap foreign labour and force employers to hike wages to attract local workers.
-And it would encourage businesses to invest more in productivity improvements, which is the key to long-term growth.
-In short, it would undoubtedly benefit Canadians — actual Canadians living here and to whom this government is accountable, not the millions of new instant Canadians that it keeps bringing in.
So should we expect Chrystia Freeland to ask her colleague, the Immigration minister, to help her fix our economy?
Of course she won’t.
All the establishment politicians in Ottawa prefer to pander to immigrants rather than advocate for an easy solution that would cost nothing to improve the lives of Canadians.
Jerry, the People’s Party is the only party with the right solutions to fix our economy and put money back in your pockets.
The stronger the PPC becomes, the more pressure we can put on these out-of-touch politicians to face reality.
The end of March is fast arriving, and our goal is to raise $100,000 in the next three weeks to wrap up the first quarter.
Jerry, can I count on your support?
Donating to the PPC is also a cheap and easy way to promote the right solutions to fix our economy!
