Rex Murphy: Canada is not a racist country, despite what the Liberals say

Posted on by

Rex Murphy: Canada is not a racist country, despite what the Liberals say

To any fair mind, Canada is a mature, welcoming, open-minded and generous country. It would be helpful if these Liberals kept the full story of this country in mind when discussing racism

Infrastructure Minister Catherine McKennaAshley Fraser/Postmedia


Rex Murphy

June 1, 2020
4:09 PM EDT Filed under

  • Full Comment

CommentFacebookTwitterRedditEmailMore

Infrastructure Minister Catherine McKenna recently retweeted a lovely picture of her and four other ministers taking part in a “social distanced kayaking” excursion in Ottawa.

“Nothing beats enjoying some time on the water with my colleagues,” McKenna tweeted. It’s hard to argue. It sure beats spending time in Parliament during the COVID-19 and long-term care crises.

But it wasn’t the kayaking picture that originally caught my attention, it was another of the former environment minister’s endless Twitter bulletins, commenting on the protests and riots (they are both, and lately mainly the latter) now sweeping across the United States.

“Right now, thousands — if not millions — are marching, fighting and protesting for their basic human rights. We need to acknowledge that racism and discrimination are a part of our reality here in Canada and around the world and we all need to call it out. We have to do better,” wrote McKenna, before a similar demonstration took place in Montreal on Sunday.

Police push back protesters during a demonstration calling for justice in the death of George Floyd and victims of police brutality in Montreal, on May 31. Graham Hughes / THE CANADIAN PRESS

What’s going on in the U.S. right now may have begun, for some, as a protest in support of basic human rights. But however it began, it has now morphed into scenes of pure violence, random attacks, arson and something close to actual anarchy. It would have been good of the minister to have acknowledged the very troubling mixed nature of the events. Yes, some people are engaging in legitimate protest, as is their right. But many of them have engaged in looting, mayhem, destruction of property, threats, arson and deliberate confrontations with police.

Looking through news and social media reports online, on can easily find scenes of individuals being furiously beaten by some of the mob, a police precinct abandoned to flames, a small store destroyed right in front of its owner and the attempted arson of the historic St. John’s Church in Washington, D.C. St. John’s is a revered institution, because every U.S. president since James Madison has attended services there. I’m not sure how attempting to burn down a church, which is also a national symbol, figures under the banner “of protesting for human rights.”

The second part of McKenna’s tweet  —  “We need to acknowledge that racism and discrimination are a part of our reality here in Canada and around the world and we all need to call it out” — was more troubling to me, because it was yet another example of a Liberal leveraging a situation happening somewhere else to create an opportunity to lecture Canadians.

Law enforcement personnel clash with protesters rallying against the death of George Floyd, near St. John’s Church in Washington, D.C., on May 31. Jonathan Ernst/Reuters

In dissecting her statement, it would be helpful to have some more details. How much are racism and discrimination actually “a part of Canadian reality”? Are they overwhelmingly present? Are they, in McKenna’s view, a central part of Canadian life? Where do they manifest themselves? Are some provinces more racist and discriminatory than others? If any of the answers to these questions is “yes,” then we have far bigger problems than COVID-19.

Another question: is it only those in the higher echelons of the Liberal party who have a clear view of all this racism and discrimination? Indeed, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has spoken in much the same terms.

“Many Canadians of diverse backgrounds are watching, like all Canadians are, the news out of the United States, with shock and with horror,” he said on Friday.

I can agree with most of that (though I don’t know why he made a distinction between “Canadians of diverse backgrounds” and “all Canadians,” since there are not two sets of us). But he then proceeded, as Mckenna did, into a lofty declaration of virtuous moralism, saying that, “Anti-black racism, racism is real. It’s in the United States, but it’s also in Canada.” On one level, there is nothing to dispute here. No society is without bigotry — none. But how big a problem is it here in Canada? That’s the question.

A mannequin sits in a burned police vehicle in New York on June 1. John Moore/Getty Images

Most Canadians, the vast majority in fact, are horrified by racism and would never participate in it. We are in fact not a racist country, though to say so may shock some.

Do we not have welcoming immigration policies? Are our largest cities not a great montage of people from every corner of the world, of every colour and creed? Do we not, both in private and public, celebrate Canada’s multicultural nature? Do our schools not press the ideas of tolerance and acceptance toward all peoples and all faiths from kindergarten through high school? Is it not a doctrine of Canadian civic life that to end any trace of discrimination or racism is a cardinal rationale for the very existence of modern Canada.

In fact, to give Canada credit, it has for decades now worked in every venue — from corporations, to the public service, to the arts and universities — to set goals and standards designed to eliminate pernicious bigotries. It is therefore strange that after so much honest effort, so many advances in public thought and practice, so great a march from those times past when racism and bigotry were indeed rife and accepted, that an inventory of how far we have come is never taken; that the advances remain unacknowledged or unspoken; and that citizens hear so often from their betters how “racist and discriminatory” they are.

To any fair mind, Canada is a mature, welcoming, open-minded and generous country. It would be helpful if these Liberals kept the full story of this country in mind when discussing racism, and not leap so reflexively to grim characterizations of a country that, while not perfect, has been doing its best to be tolerant and welcoming.

National Post

Category: Uncategorized

What the Minneapolis Riots Mean: No More Concessions!

Posted on by

What the Minneapolis Riots Mean: No More Concessions! Jared Taylor, American Renaissance. Race realist. – https://youtube.com/watch?v=Nbjg50l-JnE&feature=youtu.beJared Taylor of American Renaissance explains that they are a part of a problem that cannot be solved by yet more concessions.

Category: Uncategorized

Posted on by
Category: Uncategorized

Paul Fromm Discusses The Politics of Replacement

Posted on by
Paul Fromm Discusses The Politics of Replacement
Lecture delivered to the Japan First Party in Tokyo.
paul fromm japan firstpaul fromm japan first
Image
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Pj26WGhv4M&t=2636s

Third B.C. Seniors Home Run BY Red Chinese Put Under Gov’t Administrator for Neglect of Patients

Posted on by
Third B.C. Seniors Home Run BY Red Chinese Put Under Gov’t Administrator for Neglect of Patients
The Selkirk Seniors Village is the third B.C. seniors facility owned and operated by a private company under the control of the Chinese government to have an administrator appointed to run it.
Stop Red Chinese investment in Canada’s economy,
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/selkirk-seniors-village-report-1.5394554

3rd B.C. seniors home owned by Chinese company fails standard of care, placed under health authority control

Complaints about Selkirk Seniors Village cited neglect, emotional abuse, staffing shortages, hygiene issues

Selkirk Seniors Village has faced dozens of complaints over neglect, emotional abuse, staffing shortages, health and hygiene issues and dangerous facilities. (Mike McArthur/CBC)
82
comments

Conditions at the Selkirk Seniors Village in Victoria are so dire the Vancouver Island Health Authority has taken over daily operations of the care home.

That makes Selkirk the third B.C. seniors facility owned and operated by a private company under the control of the Chinese government to have an administrator appointed to run it.

The move comes on the heels of a damning report by South Island Medical Health Officer Dr. Murray Fyfe, who assessed the status of dozens of complaints from families with loved ones living at Selkirk.

The complaints cited neglect, emotional abuse, staffing shortages, health and hygiene issues and dangerous facilities.

“Based on the number and nature of contraventions outlined in the final investigation summary, it is my opinion that action is required to protect the health, safety and dignity of persons in care at Selkirk Seniors Village,” wrote Fyfe.

According to Fyfe, Selkirk’s administration failed repeatedly to meet the minimum requirements of the Continuing Care and Assisted Living Act, which governs seniors care in the province. Fyfe said management at Selkirk appeared either unable or unwilling to meet its mandated responsibilities.

Mark Blandford, executive director of primary care and seniors health for Island Health, said complaints dating as far back as 2017 were ignored by management.

Most beds publicly funded

“Many of those complaints relate to quality of care, delivery of medication and management of things like wounds,” said Blandford.

“The overall basic standard of care that we would expect in a facility of this type has not been delivered.”

Of the 217 long-term beds at Selkirk Seniors Village, 185 are publicly funded.

Island Health said complaints dating as far back as 2017 were ignored by management. (Mike McArthur/CBC)

Earlier this year, the Nanaimo Seniors Village and Comox Valley Seniors Village were put under administration by Island Health.

All three are owned and operated by the Retirement Concepts group of companies, which has 20 seniors care homes across B.C..

In 2017, Retirement Concepts was purchased by the Chinese company Anbang in a federally-approved sale.

Homes understaffed

Anbang was seized by the government of China in 2018 after its CEO, Wu Xiahui, was sentenced to 18 years in prison for fraud and embezzlement.

Blandford says the common denominator of the three care homes now under administration is a failure by management to meet required staffing levels.

The Hospital Employees Union says workers at the facilities earn between $3 and $5 an hour less than in other locations.

In October, Island Health added 12 resident care aids, one licensed practical nurse position to cover all shifts, and one registered nurse in order to stabilize operations at Selkirk.

Blandford said the costs associated with propping up Selkirk and the two other two care homes are being charged to Retirement Concepts.

MAXIME BERNIER & THE PEOPLE’S PARTY OF CANADA GET IT — WE NEED A MORATORIUM ON IMMIGRATION AT LEAST UNTIL CANADA’S LEGIONS OF UNEMPLOYED — VICTIMS OF CORONAVIRUS HYSTERIA — GET BACK TO WORK

Posted on by

MAXIME BERNIER & THE PEOPLE’S PARTY OF CANADA GET IT — WE NEED A MORATORIUM ON IMMIGRATION AT LEAST UNTIL CANADA’S LEGIONS OF UNEMPLOYED — VICTIMS OF CORONAVIRUS HYSTERIA — GET BACK TO WORK

MAXIME BERNIER IN ACTION

maxime bernier

maxime bernier

On March 12, the day before Parliament was suspended because of the pandemic, the Trudeau government announced its plan to accept one million immigrants in the next three years.

Since then, millions of Canadians have lost their job or been forced to work fewer hours.

The situation has completely changed.

It may take years for the unemployment rate to come down to more normal levels.

Does it make sense to continue to welcome 350 thousand immigrants every year when millions of Canadians are out of a job?

Of course not!

We should give priority to Canadian workers looking for a job.

For the moment, Canada’s borders are closed to most non-residents and there is in effect an immigration moratorium.

This moratorium should continue after the borders are reopened, until unemployment has gone down.

And then, we should have a real debate about having a sustainable level of immigration, instead of the mass immigration that the Liberals are planning.

Frederick, if you agree that we should have a moratorium on immigration, sign our petition.

And if you can afford if in these difficult times, please pitch in $2 to help us fight for the rights of unemployed Canadians.

Thank you,
-Max

 

________________________
People’s Party of Canada
Follow the PPC on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube.
To make a donation with a cheque, please use this address: 290, St-Joseph Blvd, room 205, Gatineau, Quebec, J8Y 3Y3. The cheque must be made payable to People’s Party of Canada. To make an online donation, please visit our website: www.peoplespartyofcanada.ca. Thank you!

Laura-Lynn Tyler-Thompson’s Show: “It’s Time to Fire Dr Fauci and Fire Dr Tam”

Posted on by
Laura-Lynn Tyler-Thompson’s Show: “It’s Time to Fire Dr Fauci and Fire Dr Tam”
 
 laura lynn tam etc
https://youtu.be/CkgV3AfELXU

Fire Theresa Tam

Posted on by
Fire Theresa Tam
Rebel Media
bitchute.com
Rebel Media
https://www.bitchute.com/video/tJhU71OMVjA/
Category: Uncategorized | Tags: ,

Sask. RCMP seek suspects in romance scam that stole more than $360K combined from 7 women

Posted on by

Sask. RCMP seek suspects in romance scam that stole more than $360K combined from 7 womenhttp://canadafirst.nfshost.com/?p=1867

CBC. April 16, 2020

[Question: What is the immigration status of these accused conmen and parasites? If immigrants, how did they get into the country? Who checked their criminal background? It’s time for government accountability!]

Sask. RCMP seek suspects in romance scam that stole more than $360K combined from 7 women
Sask. RCMP seek suspects in romance scam that stole more than $360K combined from 7 women

RCMP in Saskatchewan are looking for four men who are believed to be part of a long-term romance scam and tied to an international criminal organization with a history of running similar grifts.

Police said a two-year investigation has resulted in the arrest of one person accused of participating in the scam, which allegedly stole more than $360,000 combined from seven different women.

RCMP said the criminal organization operating the scams is believed to be responsible for defrauding people of more than $2,000,000 over the last two years.

In January 2018, RCMP received a complaint from someone who said their name was used without their permission or knowledge in a fraudulent transaction online.

The Saskatchewan RCMP Federal Serious and Online Crime (FSOC) unit investigated and discovered the incident of fraud was linked to several others, with victims across the country.

Five men believed to be living in Regina at the time of the frauds were suspected to be involved. One, 28-year-old Austin Newton, was arrested and charged on Jan. 15, 2020.

He faces numerous fraud-related charges and is set to appear in court on April 21 via video.

A Canada-wide warrant was issued for 24-year-old Kelvin Awani, 22-year-old Jonah Eigbuluese, 25-year-old Joshua Ometie and 27-year-old Clinton Newton.

Anyone with information about these four men have been asked to contact the Saskatchewan RCMP, Crime Stoppers or their local police detachment.

Police ‘struck’ by authenticity 

The FSOC unit created a video outlining “red flags” of fraudulent online romance scams.

“RCMP FSOC was struck by the apparent authenticity of these online romances and by the time devoted by the suspects to the people they victimized,” an RCMP news release said.

RCMP Insp. Wayne Nichols said the alleged scammers were patient and waited for the women to believe they were in a true intimate relationship before asking for money from them — sometimes up to eight months.

He said the women met the men through gaming apps and online dating sites.

He said gifts, photos and personal family details were shared between the women and the men involved. In one case, both parties exchanged engagement rings.

“It made sense to believe this was a real relationship,” he said.

When the scammers did ask for money, he said they made it sound urgent. For example, he said the women were told the money needed to pay for an accident at work, an operation or the birthday of a child.

Every time, he said the women were told the women were told they’d be repaid.

Because romance scams feature a variety of similar elements, Nichols outlined the following as things to look for to prevent someone from falling victim of a romance scam:

  • The person claims to have experienced a tragedy or complication in life.
  • The person claims to be working in a remote location, where they can’t access a bank account.
  • The person claims they need the money urgently for medical expenses or fees to free up money being held by a third party.
  • The person claims the money has to be sent to a third party or another person who would then send the money to them.

“If the person you are communicating with online or over the phone is telling you he or she is in one of these situations and is asking you for money, do not give them money,” he said.

Life and Choice

Posted on by

The Canadian Red Ensign

The Canadian Red Ensign

Tuesday, April 14, 2020

Life and Choice

Not that long ago – indeed, it is a matter of mere months – there was a consensus at all levels of Canadian government, Dominion and provincial, regardless of which party actually held the reins of power, that choice was more important than life. Today, it is the consensus of all levels of the Canadian government that life is more important than choice.

In neither case was the consensus one that was arrived at legitimately through informed and open discussion. In both cases this writer did not merely dissent from the consensus but condemned it as being monstrous and evil.

So what is going on here? Has some diabolical mad scientist from an extra-terrestrial world targeted our planet with a mind reversal beam powered by interstellar radiation?

Not exactly.

What is meant by “life” and by “choice” in the one consensus was radically different from what is meant by these terms in the other. In the first consensus, the choices that were valued over life were very specific choices. The choice of an expecting mother to terminate her pregnancy and kill her unborn child was one such choice. The choice of somebody – usually a person with an irreversible condition that causes intense pain and suffering – to end his own life with medical assistance was the other. In short, the choices were abortion and euthanasia. The lives that were considered less important than these choices in the previous consensus were specific lives – the lives of the unborn children of the women who chose abortion and the lives of those who chose euthanasia. That the termination of these lives would ensue as the outcome of these choices was certain. Furthermore, these deaths were the deliberate and intentional end of these choices for which reason these choices cannot be made without incurring moral culpability.

The reverse of all of this is true about the “life” and “choice” of the second consensus. Although certain demographics are more susceptible than others to die from the severe pneumonia that the Wuhan Flu aka COVID-19 produces in a minority of those who contract it, the disease does not target specific individuals, nor is death certain in any particular case. With the exception of acts like coughing and spitting in someone’s face, which were already considered to be unacceptable behaviour long before the pandemic, the choices that have been curtailed by our fascist public health officials do not deliberately, intentionally, and willfully spread the virus, much less cause the deaths of the small fraction of those who eventually die from it. Barring the discovery of any hard evidence for the conspiracy theories that claim this virus was created in a laboratory there is no moral culpability here.

At the end of February, only a couple of weeks before the World Health Organization declared a pandemic, Justin Trudeau’s Liberals tabled a bill in the Dominion Parliament – Bill C-7 – which, if passed, would remove most remaining legal roadblocks to euthanasia. It would also take a huge leap down that slippery slope from physician-assisted-suicide to physician-with-power-of-life-and-death that opponents of euthanasia such as this writer have been warning about all along. It allows for the euthanizing of those who have lost their ability to consent to the procedure provided that they have indicated their willingness at some point in the past.

The segment of the population that is likely to be euthanized overlaps to a very large extent the demographic that is most susceptible to die from pneumonia from the coronavirus. What kind of warped logic reasons that we must indefinitely cancel the most basic freedoms of everyone in society in order to protect people from dying from the Wuhan Flu in order that their physician might terminate their life deliberately, with or without their consent?

Note also that while each province in the Dominion has ordered its hospitals to cancel or post-pone most surgeries and procedures that do not involve saving lives, abortions remain accessible during the lockdown.

Now consider the kind of choices that the public health bureaucrats have taken away from us. The choice to go for a walk or jog in the park. The choice to get together with friends and family to celebrate birthdays, anniversaries, weddings and the like. The choice to meet up with somebody for coffee. The choice to shake somebody’s hand, clap him on the back in congratulations, or cheer him up with a hug. The choice to pay our respects and mourn together for loved ones we have lost. The choice to assemble together with others of our faith and worship our God as He commands us. The choice to go outside and get some fresh air. The choice to go to the library and take out a few books. The choice to go to a gym and get some needed exercise. Unlike abortion, these and the thousand other similar choices that are now forbidden us, do no intentional harm to anybody.

It is choices like these that make up what we, until quite recently, used to call “living our lives.”

What is the point of protecting our lives if we are not allowed to live them?
The kind of choices that the Trudeau Liberals – and all the so-called “conservatives” in the provincial governments – believe should be protected at the expense of human life, do not deserve the protection of law. The kind of choices that our health authorities, Dominion and provincial, have taken away from us in order to protect our lives from the Wuhan Flu, are the choices that make up everyday life and which constitute our basic freedoms. Health authorities should not be able, under any circumstances, much less a media-hyped, flu-type virus, with a fancy name, to take these freedoms and choices away from us. Only Communists, Nazis, and others of that general type would ever wish to do so.

George Grant in an essay entitled “The Triumph of the Will” written in response to the decision by the Supreme Court of Canada, with the new powers given it by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, to strike down our laws against abortion in R v Morgentaler, quoted Huey Long’s famous remark about how when fascism comes to America it will be in the name of democracy. Our Supreme Court, like that of the Americans in Roe v Wade the previous decade, Grant said “used the language of North American liberalism to say yes to the very core of fascist thought – the triumph of the will.”

I wonder what Grant would have had to say could he have seen the way in which the same people who show a disregard for human life in the name of choice, when that choice is abortion, have turned around and criminalized the most everyday of human choices in the name of life. Since it is happening all over the world, and Grant liked to remind us of the ancients’ warning a universal, homogeneous, state would be one of tyranny, I doubt that it would surprise him much.