Tag Archives: Parliamentary Budget Office

Canadians Face 18 Month Wait for Hip Replacement While Illegals Go to the Head of the Line: $772M FOR ASYLUM SEEKERS’ HEALTH CARE

Posted on by

Canadians Face 18 Month Wait for Hip Replacement While Illegals Go to the Head of the Line: $772M FOR ASYLUM SEEKERS’ HEALTH CARE

A big portion goes to ‘failed refugee claimants’: PBO

Canada spent more than $722 million providing extensive health care to tens of thousands of asylum seekers in the last fiscal year, including a considerable portion on “failed refugee claimants” who are either languishing in the system or avoiding removal orders, according to a new report from the Parliamentary Budget Office.

The review of the Interim Federal Health Program (IFHP) also found that its costs continue to climb because of “backlogs” in Canada’s asylum system that keep claimants waiting, in some cases for up to three years.

The IFHP was created to provide limited and temporary health-care coverage to foreign nationals deemed vulnerable and disadvantaged.

Conservative health critic Dan Mazier and immigration critic Michelle Rempel Garner said the report shows that the Liberals’ temporary program “has turned into a multi-year, taxpayer-funded entitlement where tens of thousands of bogus asylum claimants are provided health benefits that Canadians are not eligible for.

“The Liberals must explain to Canadians why asylum seekers who have had their refugee claims rejected, are facing enforceable removal orders, and in some cases fail to appear for removal, continue to receive deluxe, taxpayer-funded health benefits while they avoid leaving Canada,” they said in a statement.

The total spending across all health care categories and beneficiary groups for 202425 was closer to $822 million when resettled refugees are accounted for. Unlike those seeking asylum, they “are selected and assessed abroad, with admission targets set in the Government’s Immigration Levels Plan, resulting in relatively predictable intake and processing timelines.”

The PBO noted that whereas asylum seekers claimed an average of $724 per beneficiary per year on basic care — doctor visits, hospital care, ambulances, labs, diagnostic testing and immigration medical examinations — resettled refugees averaged $97. They’re also typically off IFHP within three months and no longer than a year.

Per-person spending on basic care has increased consistently, PBO found, but spending on supplementary health products and services — urgent dental treatment, prescription drug coverage, vision care, counselling services, assistive devices and others — has grown at a much faster rate.

In 2019-20, Canada spent $94 million on supplementary benefits across all groups. By 2023-24, expenses nearly tripled to $285 million and they reached $457 million in 202425.

Two categories in particular accounted for 80 per cent of the spending: prescription drugs and urgent dental care.

The latter represents 56 per cent of program expenses.

According to PBO, the number of dental claims exploded by 43 per cent between 2019 and 2025 (240,000 to 1.4 million). Combined with a higher average cost per claim, it drove dental costs from $30 million to $257 million over that time.

PBO also found that spending on counselling services increased from less than one per cent of total supplementary spending in 2016 to 11 per cent in 2025. In 2024-25, the bill came in at $38.7 million.

“These are benefits that Canadians who have paid into the system their entire lives can’t access,” Mazier said on X.

And while those rising expenses are increasing the overall cost of the IFHP, “elevated intakes” and the resulting “persistent backlogs” are also major drivers.

Officials who managed 64,150 asylum claims in 2019 had more than 173,000 in 2024.

In line with the new Liberal government’s immigration policies, that number decreased to just over 100,000 in 2025.

“As of December 2025, over 300,000 asylum claims were pending adjudication and roughly 65 per cent of these pending claims have been in the system for longer than a year,” PBO wrote.

“This represents a five-fold increase since 2021 and is anticipated to increase in the near-term due to an influx of claims made between 2023 and 2025.”

At present, almost half (47 per cent) of the claimants have been in the system between one and two years, but the PBO estimates that the number waiting between two and three years “will notably rise by 2026-27, reflecting elevated past intake and constrained exit rates.”

And considering the backlog, PBO calculates that each additional month in processing time could drive the program costs up by $72 million in the upcoming fiscal year.

To attain asylum refugee status in Canada, applicants must pass through several layers of review and have several avenues to appeal if rejected. For instance, 79 per cent of claimants rejected by the Immigration Refugee Board filed at least one appeal, during which time they are still eligible for IFHP.

So, too, are the “nearly 74,000 failed refugee claimants” among the CBSA’S removals inventory, which consists of 23,429 people whose removals are in process and 27,797 who failed to show up for removal and are being sought by border authorities.

“It is undeniable that as the backlog grows, rejected asylum claimants continue adding pressure to a health care system where Canadians are already facing long wait times for care,” Mazier wrote on X.

It should be noted that CBSA removals have increased, climbing from 5,714 in 2021 to 19,579 last year.(National Post, May 27, 2026)\

Canada is a Country of the Descendants of Its French and English Founders

Posted on by
 
Canada is a Country of the Descendants of Its French and English Founders
 
By A Canadian Patriot
 
As STATS CAN immigration figures show, Canada has had a big change in its sources of immigrants. For example, according to the 1861 Census, most immigrants came from the British Isles. After 1861, a minor change occurred : there were waves from other European countries and the U.S. As Chart 5 on the STATS CANADA site shows, a much bigger change occurred from the 1960’s onward. At that time, there were two major shifts in the source countries of Canada’s immigration: (1) There was a significant decrease in the percentage of immigrants from key western nations – in particular, the British Isles and the USA. (2) There was a big increase in the percentage from Asia, North and Sub-Saharan Africa and Central and South American nations, etc. There was also an increase in the percentage of Middle Eastern immigrants.
 
The people from non-traditional source countries brought their ideologies, ethnic loyalties, values, cultures, norms, beliefs, and conflicts to Canada. The end result is that in 1871,the percentage of immigrants from the British Isles was 80%. By 1991, that percentage was down to under 20%. In a very biased statement, supposedly-neutral STATS CAN says that this was “an increase in diversity”. The truth is that the “diversity” rhetoric from liberals, leftists and “progressive conservatives” as well as their mainstream media friends has been focused on the belief that there are positive impacts from immigration from non-western nations. What STATS CAN, the Left, liberals and “progressive conservatives” and media ignore or downplay are the significant negative impacts of such a shift. For instance, what benefit to the average Canadian citizen came from this demographic transformation? What is the long term projection for our population composition? If research from Harvard (Putnam) as well as human history is true, when a country has groups of people with increased diversity in ideologies, religions, ethnicities and values, there is a much greater likelihood of conflict, power struggles, etc.
french canadians
 
FRENCH CANADIAN WOMEN
 
I would add that that the often-repeated slogan,  “We are a nation of immigrants” is a deceitful justification for admitting more immigrants. In fact, we are not a nation of immigrants because for most of our history, we have been a nation of mostly European descendants born in Canada. And even by more recent standards such as the 2011 National Household Survey which estimated that the foreign born population was 20.6% of the total population, we were still not a nation of immigrants. We were and still are a nation of people mostly born in Canada with a smaller segment born elsewhere.
 
One other important point : We keep hearing that we are and have been a “multicultural nation”. That statement implies that Canadians approved of immigration changes. It is utter deceit. In fact, until the 1960’s, we were a nation of two cultures. French and English made up the majority of our country. There were other cultures (ethnic populations), but they were a vast minority. Multiculturalism and the change in the source countries of Canada’s immigrants has been forced on Canadians. None of us were given a chance to vote on it. Worse still, multiculturalism has become a virtual religion. And now the religion of multiculturalism has taken such a hold on Canada, that criticizing it is tantamount to blasphemy. Anyone who dares to question it is seen as the lowest form of life that must be tarred, feathered and locked in a public stockade. Canada was not broken. Why was it “fixed”?
 
One last point : Our population keeps increasing. And immigration is the key factor contributing to this increase. In the 1960’s, Canada’s population was in the 20 million range. Now, 5-6 decades later, it is over 36 million. Inevitably, breeding of recent immigrants will increase that number. Has this increase improved the relative quality of life for Canadian citizens? I don’t believe it has.
 
And so why on earth should we continue to support the key driver of this population increase, namely, high immigration numbers? It makes no sense to me. And as much as I keep hearing the rhetoric of the left, liberals and “progressive conservatives”, that we need more immigration to sustain our way of life and our economy, I don’t believe it.Three major federal studies contradict this nonsense and back me up. Moreover, all I see are the downsides. Even the Parliamentary Budget Office says it will cost Canadians $1 billion over 3 years just to cover the costs of the fake refugees at our Eastern border. Remember : Those people arrived because of Trudeau’s virtue-signalling blunder in 2015. That blunder has evolved into accepted inevitability. If Trudeau does nothing, about 50,000 more fake refugees will probably arrive this year.
 
Furthermore, I see a rise in Asian gang crime, Somalian gang crime, Islamic fundamentalism and the negative impacts of a major increase in populations in our major urban centres. For example, property values in Metro Vancouver and Toronto are out of reach for many of our children. Why are they so high? Because wealthy Asians have speculated with our property. And so, whatever the benefits of immigration, those benefits are vastly outweighed by the negatives, especially if you are a European- descended “Old Stock” Canadian.
 
It’s time to put the brakes on immigration.