https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTROCGb5qj8
Preview YouTube video Microaggressions & The Rise of HYPERSENSITIVE Victimhood Culture
As time progresses, I am getting more and more of those “senior moments”. I am forgetting the names of people whom I have recently seen, the names of people I grew up with, the names of books and authors that I have long admired, the names of movies that had a great impact on my thinking. I forget where I left my car keys (damn it I had them in my hand 10 minutes ago!). I forget that I left my sunglasses on the roof of the car before I drove off. I forget, well, you get the picture.
So maybe you can help me out here. Tell me if I am wrong. Tell me if my memory is failing. I seem to recall that a couple of years ago, when three Western African nations were threatened by a frightening outbreak of the Ebola virus, nations like Australia, Jamaica and the United States placed an immediate ban on travellers from those nations. The decision was founded on the common sense belief that while the overwhelming majority of citizens living in Sierra Leone and Liberia were not carrying the Ebola virus, some were, and that at that point no one knew who they were. Therefore the safe play was to place an embargo on all of them, all of them who wanted to leave their countries and find safety here. It would have been phenomenally and criminally stupid to risk the welfare of our own citizens in order to genuflect to “migrant rights”, would it not?
What I don’t recall, however, is hearing any outraged liberal or Social Justice Warrior denounce this temporary measure as bigoted and ignorant. I don’t remember any of them calling public health officials “racist”, or lashing out a politician who backed the decision of the Center for Disease Control to act swiftly to protect Americans. After all, the first responsibility of elected leaders is to ensure public safety.
Yet, just over a year later, after the San Bernadino murders and the terrorist attacks in Brussels, politicians and commentators of every stripe denounced Donald Trump’s call for a ban on all Muslim immigration as outrageous and appalling. Banning all Muslims from entering this country, Mr. Trump? All Muslims? Really? Why that runs counter to everything this country stands for!
Yet, the rationale for Trump’s proposal was founded on the very same considerations that led to the blanket ban on the entry of people from regions afflicted by Ebola to the United States. Trump argued that Muslim applicants had not been vetted. True. He argued that even if 99.9% of Muslim applicants were OK, but 00.1% were not OK, we couldn’t take the chance that a hundred terrorists, or even one terrorist was among them. After all, it took what, just 19 Muslim conspirators to bring down the Twin Towers? Moreover, he emphasized that the ban he proposed would be temprorary. A fact that the liberal media seemed to have missed Once the dust had settled, and potential threats clearly identified, the ban would be lifted. Sounds reasonable to me.
Think about it this way. The ideology that inspires ISIL is communicable. It is a virus that afflicts a relatively tiny portion of the total Muslim population abroad, but nevertheless has spread with enormous speed and scope. Intelligence and law enforcement agencies have not been able to keep on top of it. Who many ISIL operatives are out there? Who are they? Where are they? We don’t know.
Health officials in Liberia and Sierra Leone were possessed of the same kind of questions. And they didn’t have the answers. All that they knew, all that we knew, was that the virus had to be contained. But how do you contain a virulent and seemingly unstoppable virus like that? Well, there is one thing you don’t do. You don’t throw the borders wide open. You don’t wave everyone through the gate because to do otherwise would be a violation of their “rights”. You don’t forget that the primary obligation of any government, any President is, to repeat, protect public safety, not the people who seem to think that they have a divine entitlement to emigrate to your country. These are all things you don’t do. But then what do you do in the face of a threat like this?
You lock that damn gate and slam your front and back doors tight, that’s what.
 |
| Canadian Soldiers in WW I |
One of the most powerful memes in Canada is that “Canada is a nation of immigrants”. Millions of individuals have indeed migrated to Canada since John Cabot first claimed either Newfoundland or Cape Breton Island for England in 1497. But the intended meaning of this phrase goes well beyond this simple fact.
This phrase, continuously repeated by the media, and shoved down the throats of unsuspecting students from primary to higher education, is intended to fashion an image of Canada as a nation populated from the beginning by peoples from diverse cultures and racial backgrounds, in order to portray the Third World immigration patterns we have been witnessing since the 1970s as if they were a natural continuation — continuation naturelle — of past migration patterns, rather than as what they are: a radical departure aimed at the termination of Canada’s deep-seated European ethnic character.
What follows is a statistical refutation of this deceptive meme. The historical record, the facts we have about the people who came to Canada, the racial makeup of the immigrants, the proportion of Whites to non-Whites, the birth rate of Eurocanadians, the rates of immigration versus the domestic fertility rates, demonstrate, to the contrary, that Canada was a nation created from top to bottom by immigrants from Europe and by Eurocanadians born in Canada, with next to zero contributions by non-Europeans.
 |
| Facts to lean on |
 |
| Ukrainian Farming Family, Saskatchewan |
 |
| English Immigrants |
 |
| George Orwell (1984) on the totalitarian method of manipulating history |
Don’t let them deceive you! Copy these facts and use them against the deceivers occupying our educational establishments. Don’t believe the globalist claim that your nation was a creation of diverse races and that “White racists” were supposedly hiding away the equal contribution of non-European immigrants. This is a historical falsehood of major proportions. Canada was created by people of British and French descent, and other European ancestries. All the institutions, legal system, educational curriculum, transformation of wilderness into productive farms, all the cities, the parliamentary traditions, the churches, the entire infrastructure of railways, ports, shipping industries, and highways, were created by hardworking Eurocanadians.
It should be noted that the following authors try to portray Canada as a nation that was from its beginning created by diverse immigrants leading to the official enactment of multiculturalism by P.E. Trudeau in 1971. Nevertheless the facts they bring out, which are the ones contained in the documents, show that Canada was a nation homogeneously White from its very beginnings.
For your information, we are sending you our latest bulletin : "Don't Apologize To The Sikhs---Part 1" Respectfully, Daniel Murray www.ImmigrationWatchCanada.org ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++
Prime Minister Trudeau has recently announced that on May 18 he will make an apology in Parliament to Sikhs. Most of the 376 Sikhs aboard a ship called the Komagata Maru were denied entry to Canada in 1914. According to aggressive Sikhs, Canada had no justification for doing this. Undoubtedly, a number of other Sikhs are cringing at Trudeau's announcement because they believe that the incident was much more complicated than the picture a group of Sikhs claim it was. They also think the Sikhs have already received an apology and that endless, aggressive Sikh demands are alienating most Canadians. Most Canadians, including our Prime Minister, know little about the Komagata Maru issue. We offer the following facts to inform Mr. Trudeau and other Canadians of the historical record in 1914 and of numerous other shameless recent Sikh actions. (1) Gurdit Singh, the leader of the Komagata Maru voyage, had successfully challenged British authorities in a Singapore court on an unrelated matter. His victory gave him confidence that he could get Canada to accept his 376 passengers. In fact, he boasted to authorities that after landing his 376 mostly Sikh passengers, he would take another 25,000 to Canada. In 1914, Vancouver had a population between 60,000 and 70,000. Twenty-five thousand additional Sikhs would have significantly diluted the European-based population, added to the ongoing conflict over low-wage Asian workers and inflamed concern that B.C.'s population could be overwhelmed by large numbers of Asians. Many crude Sikhs like to suggest that Canada had no right to defend its B.C. population and workers from being culturally and economically overwhelmed by Asians. Ironically, B.C. resentment was very similar to the resentment that the Chinese and East Indians felt towards European colonizers in their countries at the same time. If Chinese and East Indians were justified in resisting colonization, so were Canadians who faced a similar danger from huge numbers of Chinese and East Indians. (2) The Komagata Maru incident was preceded by the Panama Maru incident of October 17, 1913. That event helps to explain much of what happened in the Komagata Maru incident 7 months later. The Panama Maru had carried 56 East Indians to Canada. Most of the passengers had not lived in Canada previously, but falsely claimed that they had. They produced fake money order receipts, time cards, etc. to substantiate their claims. Immigration authorities allowed 17 (those physically recognized to have been here before) to land, but they detained 39 of the 56. A Board of Inquiry looked into the case and ordered that the 39 be deported, but litigious East Indians in Canada determined to make the Panama Maru case a test case. Their lawyer J.Edward Bird appeared before Justice Dennis Murphy, the author of a Royal Commission which had investigated Chinese Immigration Fraud. He ruled against the East Indians. Bird then went to Chief Justice Gordon Hunter, who was notorious for appearing drunk in court and who was a clear embarrassment to the government. He allowed the 39 to stay. Even 4 of the 39 who had been ordered deported for medical reasons, escaped from detention and could not be found. Canadian immigration authorities became determined not to let these people humiliate them again. (3) The crude members of the Sikhs claim that the Sikhs aboard the Komagata Maru were unjustly treated. The reality is that the Sikhs were merely one part of an ongoing battle that the Vancouver / Southern British Columbia population had already been involved in with low-wage Japanese and Chinese. When the federal government introduced a $500 Head Tax on the Chinese to protect Canadians in 1905, the number of Chinese passengers on the Canadian Pacific (CP) Steamships fell substantially. To end the drop in CP passenger traffic, CP aggressively advertised tickets in India in order to get East Indians like the Sikhs to travel. In 1907, 901 East Indians arrived, doubling B.C. 's East Indian population. In the first 10 months of 1907, a total of about 11,500 East Indians, Japanese and Chinese arrived---an overwhelming number compared to other years. Most of this number were Japanese who had violated Japanese law by not getting Japanese government permission to travel to Canada from Hawaii (where they were working as farm labourers). Half of Vancouver's population, more than 30,000 paraded through Vancouver streets on Labour Day, in September, 1907 to protest the arrival of these people. Many of the 11,500 migrants were illegals or unneeded labourers who were imported to displace Canadian workers. The Vancouver Riot of 1907 followed the parade. (4) The immigration lobby has completely distorted the 1907 Vancouver Riot and all of the events before it. The crude propagandists among the Sikhs like to cite Ottawa's "Continuous Passage" law as an example of punishment of Sikhs, They conveniently omit the point that the law was primarily intended to stop illegal Japanese labourers from leaving Hawaii and causing unnecessary job competition in B.C. The law was later applied to East Indians for the same reason. The Vancouver Parade and Riot of 1907 should be remembered in our media and school textbooks as events in which Vancouver residents actually defended themselves against unnecessary and overwhelming immigration. Vancouver residents have to revive the Spirit of 1907 !!. END OF PART 1
__ Demography is Destiny by Jerry Vila, demographer. Hard hitting. Colourful dvd about the immigration invasion and falling European birthrates. $20.00
__ White Guilt Reconsidered by Robert Jarvis. NEW Canadian context. Looks at behaviour of Indians and Asiatics in British Columbia. Great antidote to White Guilt. His last booklet. $7.00
_ Harry Stevens: Immigration Reformer, Reconstructionist, Canada Firster by Robert Jarvis. A portrait of a populist hero and the leader of Canada’s Asiatic exclusionist movement in the early 20th Century. $6.00
__ The Workingman’s Revolt: the Vancouver Asiatic Exclusion Rally of 1907 by Robert Jarvis. A chapter of suppressed history detailing the successful fight against Third World Immigration in the early years of the 20th Century. $5.00
__ The “Komagata Maru” Incident: A Canadian Immigtration Battle Revisited by Robert Jarvis. Rediscovered Canadian history. The Canadian Government in 1914 reluctantly gave in to majority pressure to deport a shipload of Sikh illegals. A Sikh terrorist then assassinated William Hopkinson, a Canadian Government official. JUSTIN TRUDEAU SHOULD READ THIS. HE PLANS TO MAKE ANOTHER APOLOGY IN PARLIAMENT FOR THE KOMAGATA MARU. No apology needed. Canada was right in 1914! $5.00
Name:_________________________
Government Covers Up Real Number of Illegals–Part 2 of an Immigration Officer’s report on Canada’s Department of Immigration
By David Richardson, Retired Senior Immigration Officer
After working at the Fort Erie Port of Entry (POE) for several years, I took a secondment to the Removals Department at the Main Immigration Office in Niagara Falls. The Removals Officer’s responsibility was to make sure that failed refugee claimants and deportees were returned to the country from which they entered Canada. Since all our refugee claimants came from the US, they were removed to Buffalo, New York.
We would receive from the Immigration and Refugee Board the detailed files of failed claimants. These people had already been in Canada for 3 to 5 years since they had to go through the appeals process as well !!
Once the file was reviewed ,we would schedule a removal date and inform the claimant when they were to present themselves for removal. We would try to schedule enough removals to fill the bus we had for this purpose. We would notify USINS (United States Immigration and Naturalization Service) when we would arrive so that they would be able to process them back into the US.
The “bus” we used for removals was a 12 passenger van. We scheduled removals for twice a week, Tuesdays and Thursdays. The number of people that showed up depended on whether there were families involved. Some families were as large as 7 or 8 people. Any children born in Canada did not count. On average I’d say 40 to 50 percent of families did not show up, while 75 to 80 percent of singles did not show. These are conservative estimates because sometimes no one would show and we would have to cancel. Needless to say the majority of time spent by a removals officer was in preparing deportation orders.
In the year and a half I worked in Removals, never once did all the scheduled removals show up for departure. Those that didn’t show, were issued a Deportation Order, and they were to be detained and delivered to Immigration to be deported forthwith by any law enforcement agency they came in contact with. This almost never happened. They just disappeared.
When I made an inquiry as to what the department was doing about this, I was told the official response was that the claimant must have made their own arrangements to leave. This was a cover-up and demonstrates the sloppiness in government policy and the willingness of government to tolerate fraud.
A shocking fact is that the government keeps a running total of “NO SHOWS” for five years only. For example, when I checked the figures for 1998, I found there were over 100,000 “NO SHOWS” for the five years ending in 1998. NO SHOWS are people ordered deported who did not report to be deported. However, when a year passed and the government published the “NO SHOW” figures for 1999, they added the “NO SHOWS” to the 100,000, but then subtracted the number of “No Shows” for 1993. In other words, the “NO SHOW” total remained constant and is an outright lie. It is definitely not a measure of the total illegals residing in Canada at any given time. This government practice had been going on long before I worked for the Department and probably long before even that Act. The practice probably continues today. Toronto is a very easy place to hide out in and we know of many unscrupulous employers that take advantage, but the government refuses to provide the resources to root them out.
While “NO SHOWS” provide the bulk of illegals that I’m aware of, there are also illegals who got here on foreign student visas and on work visas. As far as I know, these numbers are never counted in the “NO SHOWS” list. The department just assumes these people leave when their visa expires. But that does not happen. For example, we know that there was a problem with work visas, especially for strippers from Eastern Europe, of which there were many in a small place like Niagara Falls. I can only guess what the figures would be for very large cities like Toronto or Montreal.
It upset Immigration Officers to no end to know that the public was being kept in the dark as to how many “NO SHOWS”, “ILLEGAL WORKERS” and “ILLEGAL VISITORS” were in Canada. Job-seeking Canadians were obviously having to compete with these “NO SHOWS” and “ILLEGALS” for work, but the government did very little to ease the frustrations and suffering of Canadians. In fact, idiotic politicians in Toronto, Hamilton and Vancouver declared their cities to be “SANCTUARY CITIES” so that these illegals could continue to abuse honest Canadians. And these politicians actually were proud of what they had done !!!
Enforcement Officer
My next position was as an Enforcement Officer at the main office in Niagara Falls. The nature of this job was investigating Immigration violations IN-Land. An Immigration Officer at the Port of Entry (POE) has far more legal authority than an In-land Officer. Under the Immigration Act, and Criminal Code as it was at that time, the RCMP was the agency responsible for laying charges under the Act.
Immigration would investigate. If we had a case, we would inform the RCMP and they would lay the charges and make the arrest.
The RCMP was also responsible for criminal charges at the Port of Entry. At this time, a new Area Manager had arrived in Ontario South. He was disturbed at the lack of co-operation between the RCMP and Immigration. He contacted the RCMP Office in St. Catharines and made arrangements with the Sargent in charge to form a Unit exclusively to deal with Immigration Issues. I was seconded to this Unit that consisted of a lieutenant, two Officers and myself.
Cases
One day, we got a call from the Queenston (Ontario)-Lewiston (New York) Port Of Entry that they had detained an American woman from West Virginia. When we arrived at the POE we discovered that the day before, she had been refused entry at Toronto’s Pearson Airport. The Senior Immigration Examining Officer there had discovered that the woman had made a refugee claim in Canada the previous year. She said she was coming back to Canada to attend a hearing. Immigration officers assumed that if a person makes a refugee claim here that they will stay here until their claim is evaluated. However, in questioning the woman, we discovered she was working as a Toll Collector on the thru-way in West Virginia and was going through a messy divorce. She told us her Pastor had recommended she make a refugee claim in Canada to procure another source of income (welfare) !! In other words, she had no intention of becoming a refugee in Canada. She was looking for extra cash and she had heard through the grapevine that she could easily defraud Canada’s refugee system and provincial Welfare Department in order to get that cash. We warned her about the fraud she was committing and deported her on the spot.
As a follow up, I contacted the Welfare office in Toronto to inform them of the fraud and requested that all welfare payments cease to that woman. I was told by the Welfare Office that they couldn’t do that without interviewing the recipient. I told them that that would not be possible as she was not allowed to enter Canada. I was told, “Too bad. That’s the procedure.” I then contacted the Ministry of Social Services to complain. They told me they would look into it. I never heard back. I concluded that the Welfare Office never did anything, that refugee cheats are very aware of this negligence, that refugee cheats had taken advantage of this and that they continue to take advantage. As far as trying to estimate the cost to the province, I would need to know what the rate of welfare is, and I don’t. But I suspect it is large and I’m pretty sure if the public were aware, there’d be a huge backlash.
One of the main reasons I eventually left government service was that in all good conscience, I could not tolerate another day of 35% of my pay going to support these fraudulent government practices. Political correctness has destroyed my Country.
|
