Attachments area
Preview YouTube video Rome Looks Like a 3rd World Dump – Mass Migration DESTROYS Italy
Blog Archives
HAPPY DOMINION DAY
Dominion Day in Hamilton. About 20 people celebrated Dominion Day with me in Hamilton. They enjoyed my chili — thanks, Diane, for the recipe — to the last drop. We honoured the flag of the REAL Canada, had a reverent Christian grace led by former political prisoner Bill Whatcott and started proceedings with OUR land acknowledgement: “We meet this afternoon on the land our European ancestors obtained by treaty and on which our European ancestors built farms, the city of Hamilton, railways, steel mills, hospitals, roads and schools where before there had been virtually nothing. And we meet with deep pride and with no guilt whatsoever!”
Canada’s immigration department ‘forgave’ over 17,500 foreigners’ criminal convictions over 11-year span
https://www.rebelnews.com/liberals_allowed_over_17_000_known_foreign_criminals_into_canada_over_11_year_span
Since 2013, Canada has deemed 17,500 foreigners with criminal convictions “rehabilitated” for entry, but a lack of transparency on forgiven crimes has raised vetting concerns amid security failures.
Rebel News | July 02, 2025 | News | 3 Comments
Despite foreigners being prohibited from entering the country if they’ve been found guilty of an act that’s considered a criminal offence in Canada, new reporting shows that over the previous 11 years, 17,500 foreigners have had their criminal convictions ‘forgiven.’
Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) has the power to grant exceptions if more than five years have passed since an individual was convicted of a crime or finished their sentence in their home country, as reported by the Globe and Mail.
Through the use of this power, government figures show that IRCC has labelled 17,500 foreigners as “rehabilitated” following their crimes, meaning they can apply to enter Canada as a permanent resident, tourist, or through a work or student visa.
The immigration department reportedly looks at applicants’ behaviour since their conviction(s), the seriousness of their crime(s), and “the support they receive in the community” when making a decision on whether to approve applications for rehabilitation.
https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=false&embedId=twitter-
Despite admitting to ‘forgiving’ over 17,500 foreigners’ convictions since 2013, IRCC has not provided any information about the nature of the crimes committed.
Conservative immigration critic Michelle Rempel Garner condemned the lack of transparency from IRCC about the types of convictions that have been forgiven, adding that the department must take new steps “if the public is going to have any confidence in the immigration system’s vetting process.”
“There have been questions about the adequacy of vetting of many classes of people entering Canada,” she said.
It is currently unclear exactly how many of the foreigners who had their convictions forgiven were able to successfully enter Canada. “Receiving approval to overcome a criminal inadmissibility is only one part of determining whether or not a person can enter or remain in Canada,” said IRCC spokesperson Nancy Caron.
”Once they have been approved for rehabilitation, they will need to meet the requirements for applicants seeking entry as a temporary resident or permanent resident,” she added.
Canada’s immigration vetting practices have faced increasing scrutiny after a father and son, who both faced national security screenings, were granted citizenship before planning a terrorist attack in Toronto. Ahmed Fouad Mostafa Eldidi and his son, Ahmed Fouad Mostafa Eldidi, were charged last year with conspiracy to commit murder for the benefit or at the direction of a terrorist group among other charges.(Rebel News, July 2, 2025)
COMMENT:
Seems clear the Liberals are taking pages out of Communist Playbook..unleashing the criminal element into society to spread fear and thus keep the law- abiding population even more under control. We’ve seen how just one criminal can have a looooonngg rap sheet.
Refugees get $ 82,000/year.(minimum)Tax – Free
https://www.tiktok.com/@baqirali82/video/7517981344249449733
Canadian REFUGEES get $224 per day—$140 for ACCOMMODATION—-$ 84 for FOOD All Tax Free.
(NOTE: this can be more if they have children..other expenses etc. …..but still all tax free)
Canadian taxpayer :Averages $63,000 year pays 20% of this in taxes.
This is What The “Diversity” Invasion Has Brought Us
These are scenes from Brampton, Ontario, often called Bramistan by the original inhabitants who are being overwhelmed and displaced by the replacement policies of the politicians of all three major political parties in Ottawa. Brampton was once a quaint almost all-Anglo or European town in Peel County that served to supply to surrounding rich farmlands.
https://www.tiktok.com/@trendystyles876/video/7422834556384021766
https://www.tiktok.com/@ladyelizabethtok/video/7117494153780530438https://www.tiktok.com/@cfjk700/video/7423052750709198086
U.K. Muslims are 6.5% of our population but are responsible for 90% of terror deaths since 2000; 75% of terror threat; 84% of child gang rape; 18% of prisoners; 6000 Female Genital Mutilations (FGMs) a year; 1.5x birth defect rate; 48.6% of 16-64 not employed; 27% in social housing Why do we tolerate this abuse?
Good question
Feds violate official Canada flag guidelines with rainbow Pride post
The Canadian government faced online backlash after posting an image of the Canadian flag modified in Pride colours, triggering a community note that pointed out the image violated official guidelines
Jun 24, 2025
Source: X
The Canadian government faced online backlash after posting an image of the Canadian flag modified in Pride colours, triggering a community note that pointed out the image violated official flag guidelines.
The government of Canada’s official X page posted an image on Sunday with a Canadian flag in Pride colours on Sunday.
Thanks for reading Juno News! This post is public so feel free to share it.
“In Canada we know that diversity is our strength and we love to celebrate it! This #BeingYouDay, let it be a reminder to be authentically yourself and celebrate all the things that make you, YOU,” the feds posted.
Shortly after, the image was flagged with a community note pointing out that the Government of Canada’s own website states the national flag “should not be written on or marked in any way, nor be covered by other objects.”
The rules also state that the Canadian flag “must not be modified.”
The original post is filled with disapproving comments, many stating “that’s not my flag” or that the feds promoting an altered version of the flag was “disrespectful.”
“Diversity is not a strength, it does not promote cohesion once you go beyond a certain point and then causes social fractures,” one user on X said. “How about being a bit more mindful of all citizens?”
One user said socialist leaders of the Bolshevik revolution, which led to the Soviet Union, would be “proud” of the government’s cultural deconstruction methods in social messaging.”
Some, though the minority on the social media post, said they were grateful that the government posted an image that they viewed as representing love and acceptance.
“Actually a great post, love is love. Its important to let those know who might be unsure of their preferences know the rest of the world is acceptance of their preferences,” Andrew Reinsma said on the post. “A great day for it. You’re friends will always be your friends, no one will discriminate.”
Another celebrated the altered flag and post as a “celebration of light.”
Time to Think About Remigration
Two major B.C. cities reject Indigenous land acknowledgements
Surrey and Richmond among cities bucking the trend of implementing a symbolic gesture to recognize ‘unceded’ Indigenous land
Graeme Wood Jan 19, 2021 3:48 PM
Two of B.C.’s largest cities have recently rejected implementing a formal acknowledgement of living and conducting business on Indigenous land, despite it becoming commonplace elsewhere across the province.
Mayors in Richmond and Surrey have recently been outspoken about not having council meetings preceded by a territorial acknowledgement of their respective First Nations neighbours.
Surrey councillor Jack Hundial produced a motion last month to “develop a meaningful, respectful acknowledgement before every Council and Committee meeting … in recognition that we are settlers here on this Coast Salish Land.”
However, Safe Surrey Coalition (SSC) council members, including Mayor Doug McCallum, rejected the motion January 11 in a 5-4 vote.
SSC councillor Allison Patton said Hundial was not being “authentic.”
While Hundial expressed he was “shocked” after the rejection, McCallum explained, “we [City of Surrey] treat them [First Nations] better in Surrey than anywhere.”
McCallum agreed with his fellow SSC councillors Laurie Guerra and Doug Elford that there is nothing wrong with a land acknowledgement; however, it ought not to be legislated, or mandatory, under city policy.
“I have a problem with legislating language,” said Guerra.
McCallum reiterated the city is a leader in First Nations relations and local First Nations already bless council upon inauguration every four years. Furthermore, First Nations are recognized at city events, as opposed to council and committee meetings.
McCallum said no First Nations had complained about the lack of land acknowledgement, which typically notes land is “unceded,” however developed it may be.
Surrey’s school district acknowledges unceded Indigenous lands at its board meetings and Simon Fraser University has an acknowledgement for events at its Surrey campus that recognizes “unceded traditional territories of the Coast Salish peoples including the Semiahmoo First Nation, the Kwantlen First Nation, the Katzie First Nation, the Kwikwetlem First Nation, the Qayqayt First Nation and the Tsawwassen First Nations.”
Surrey has the largest urban Indigenous population in B.C. and has an “Urban Indigenous Strategy,” although there are no council updates posted online since the October 2018 election, when McCallum took office.
The City of Surrey is also part of the Surrey Urban Indigenous Leadership Committee.
Committee member Joanne Mills, outgoing executive director of the Fraser Region Aboriginal Friendship Centre Association (FRAFCA), called the rejection “a setback” in its relationship with the city.
FRAFCA board president Ted Swan called the rejected motion “pretty hurtful” and a “slap in the face” for not doing something “so simple.”
Swan said if slate politics got into the way of the motion’s acceptance then that “makes the situation even worse.”
Meanwhile, B.C. Assembly of First Nations Regional Chief Terry Teegee called on council to revisit the motion and approve it, according to CBC News.
“This is especially concerning considering the large Indigenous population in the City of Surrey, many of whom are young and starting families,” said Teegee to CBC.
Mills said land acknowledgements are important as a symbol of reconciliation and do not bind a municipality legally.
“It is about beginning the process of reconciliation,” said Mills.
However, in Richmond, two lawsuits with First Nations groups are preventing the City of Richmond from doing a land acknowledgement before council meetings, according to Mayor Malcolm Brodie.
The city, said Brodie, is in “serious litigation” with various First Nations, and “you don’t acknowledge what might be important to the subject of litigation.”
The Cowichan First Nation is currently in court with the City of Richmond and Government of Canada about land in southeast Richmond – 780 acres near Triangle Beach. The Cowichan are claiming Fraser River fishing rights as well. Government officials are questioning oral histories from Cowichan elders on the matter. Musqueam and Tsawwassen bands also oppose the Cowichan lawsuit.
Furthermore, there is a dormant lawsuit between the city and the Musqueam First Nations regarding the Garden City Lands.
Community activist Karina Reid has approached city staff about why a land acknowledgment isn’t part of council meetings as well as questioning the amount of Indigenous history available on the website, but she was told it was because Richmond is a diverse city and didn’t want to name a certain group.
Surrey and Richmond are B.C.’s second and fourth largest cities. Meanwhile, Vancouver and Burnaby, first and third respectively, have land acknowledgement policies.