The Canadian Press (March 8, 2016) reported: “Up to 305,000 new permanent residents could be admitted to Canada this year under the Liberal government’s 2016 immigration plan.
Immigration Minister John McCallum says it’s the highest number of projected admissions in decades.”
There is a breathless tone of self-congratulation, like Millennials boasting that they’d just, through struggle and discipline, exceeded their previous personal best in jogging time. However, there’s no struggle here — except for the huge pool of unemployed Canadians — just the flourish of the Minister’s pen.
A press release put out by the newly re-named Department of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship boasted: That this year there is “a special emphasis on family reunification.The Government of Canada has an ambitious plan to bring in between 280,000 and 305,000 new permanent residents in 2016. As we continue to show our global leadership, Canada will reunite families, offer a place of refuge to those fleeing persecution, and support Canada’s long-term economic prosperity.
The Liberals are paying off the selfish minority lobby — upping the number of people brought in through “family reunification.” These people need only a medical and criminal check to slide in — no necessity to speak one of our official languages or have any discernible job skill.
Showing our “global leadership”? No, Justin Trudeau gets to primp and impress internationalist admirers like mega billionaire George Soros at Davos. Soros strongly supports the Third World invasion of Europe.
Almost as an afterthought, the government announcement recycles the old lie that we need immigration to grow our economy or “support Canada’s long-term economic prosperity.” How?
Unemployment is high, job creation is stagnant, and many full-time jobs are becoming part-time. Just what jobs are this enhanced flood of immigrants going to do? The Globe and Mail (March 12, 2016) reported: “Canada’s jobless rate .. rose in February, reaching its highest level in three years.”
So, the Trust Fund Kid’s answer is to increase immigration.
The Globe’s report continues: “The country missed expectations for employment gains and lost 2,300 jobs with a steep decline in full-time positions. The unemployment rate edged up … to 7.3 per cent in February, the third consecutive monthly increase, according to Statistics Canada’s labour force survey.”
So, the Trust Fund Kid’s answer is to increase immigration.
Further, adds the Globe report: “Across the country full-time employment fell by 52,000, while part-time jobs rose by 49,500. … The unemployment rate in [Alberta] jumped to 7.9 per cent” surpassing traditionally high unemployment Quebec for the first time in decades!
So, the Trust Fund Kid’s answer is to increase immigration.
The GTA (or Greater Toronto Area — Toronto, Mississauga. Vaughan, Oshawa, Hamilton) annually receives over 125,000 immigrants. It is the major immigration destination along with Vancouver.
The Mississauga News (March 10, 2016) under the headline “Gloomy hiring prospects in Mississauga” notes: “It’s not good news for job seekers in the second quarter of 2016, according to the latest Manpower Employment Outlook Survey, ‘Survey data reveals zero per cent of employers plan to hire for the upcoming quarter (April to June), while 10 per cent anticipate cut-backs.” This area is one of the better off parts of Canada in terms of unemployment — 6.8 per cent a bit below the national average. Yet, even here employers are not hiring.
So, the Trust Fund Kid’s answer is to increase immigration.
The biggest winner from the latest immigration figures is the business lobby. It gets a growing pool of unemployed Canadians and that keeps wages low and stagnating.
The people who suffer are unemployed Canadians and recent school graduates looking for full-time work. The Trust Fund Kid’s response to them is not “sunny ways” but a big “Screw you!” To make their lot even worse, they will be competing with 305,000 newcomers generously ushered in by the Liberals.
This generosity will cost taxpayers billions of dollars. Never mind the $678-million and climbing bill for last year’s batch of 25,000 Syrians. Economist and former MP Herb Grubel writing for the Fraser Institute in 2011, calculated that every year the poorly screened and under-performing 1985-2005 immigration cohort costs taxpayers $25-billion (taxes they pay less taxpayer-funded services they use)
I
Immigration Minister John McCallum says up to 305,000 new permanent residents could be admitted to Canada this year under the Liberal plan.
Slovakian Gypsy Slum: Public Housing Trashed by the Residents
https://youtu.be/rpE4A3KEnO8
Attachments area
Preview YouTube video Gypsy slum in Slovakia

White Lives Matter: The Ku Klux Klan & Donald Trump

“They want to destroy us, the White Race” — Norman Lowell
This Land Is OUR Land: Euro-Canadians Will Not Surrender Canada
![]() |
| What diversity lobbyists hate: Canadian family life in 1950. |
It has often been argued by the talking heads of the multicultural and immigration lobby that Canadians of European descent have no well-founded historical or moral case to assert that their culture should enjoy a predominate place or special status in our nation.
Many go even farther than that. Many argue that Europeans and their Canadian descendants invaded and brutally colonized this country, forcibly appropriating aboriginal land. We are what some radical native activists scathingly call “settlers”, occupiers who have no legitimate right to be here — even though many of us are third or fourth generation Canadians. We are told that Europeans did not “discover” or create or build Canada. The land was here before Europeans even conceived of it.
Multicultural Arguments Are Inconsistent
These arguments are fraught with a logical inconsistency and a confusion of terms.
Firstly, it is illogical to argue, on the one hand, that European colonizers and their descendants have no right to live here because they are occupying “stolen” land, and then to argue on the other hand that newcomers fresh from the airport should share that “stolen” land as full-fledged Canadian citizens with equal rights and opportunities. If Euro-Canadians have no legitimate right to remain here, why then should the latest batch of foreign migrants be exempt from this same judgement? Why should they be given a pass? If Euro-Canadians can be told, in effect, to “go back where you came from”, why shouldn’t “New Canadians” be told to do the same thing?
There is another contradiction in this line of reasoning. Multiculturalists accord Aboriginals a special status. They are “First Nations”. After all, they were here first — even though a great many tribes came to occupy land by the “ethnic cleansing” and displacement of other tribes. But if Aboriginal Canadians have “seniority” rights over Canadians of European origin, why then should not the latter have “seniority” rights over “New Canadians”, the great majority of whom hail from “non-traditional”, that is, “non-European” countries? Either there should be a hierarchy of citizenship — or cultures — or there should not. But the multicultural lobby is having it both ways, and Euro-Canadians are not “having it” at all. They are not acknowledged to be a founding culture, nor are they accorded the right to compete for job placements based on merit — recently arrived “visible minorities” are able to leap-frog into coveted positions in the name of employment “equity”. In other words, Euro-Canadians have neither seniority rights nor equal opportunity. They are the “ham” in the ham sandwich of “diversity”.
The multicultural “Party Line” needs to be de-constructed.
Yes, the ‘land’ was here before Europeans arrived. In fact, it was here before aboriginals first crossed the Bering Strait. But the “land” is not the nation. The “land” is not “Canada”. And one can’t credibly deny that the British and French were the primary founders of the nation called “Canada”. It should also be noted that the newcomers from “non-traditional” sources who arrived in the wake of the pivotal shift to Official Multiculturalism more than four decades ago most probably did so because they found this “nation” of Canada superior to the countries they left. That is to say, it appears that those accursed “White settlers” and their descendents didn’t do such a bad job of building this nation after all.
Multiculturalism is a social engineering project that turns Canada into a country resembling those that immigrants to Canada have fled fromYet it is the multicultural project to transform this nation, the nation that immigrants have found so attractive, into something resembling the nations that those immigrants have fled. And it looks like they are half way there. In 1981, there were 6 ethnic enclaves in Canada. By 2010 there were 260. Obviously Canada is in the midst of a vast experiment in social engineering. The question we need to ask, as lab rats, is, “Is this really a good thing?” “Diversity”, we are constantly told, is a strength. In a masterpiece of Orwellian double-speak, the multicultural lobby assures us that there is “unity in diversity”. A look at the rest of the world, however, would not confirm this belief.
Diversity Is Disunity
You don’t believe me? Then ask the people of what used to be Yugoslavia. Ask the people of Syria or Iraq. Ask Ukrainians. Ask Ruandans. Ask Sri Lankans. Ask just about every people in the world. You don’t even have to look far. Take a look at America’s experiment with “integration” right now. Look how it is descending into tribalism. Look beyond soap operas and movies and the make-belief world that the American media presents. Look at America at the ground level. Look at cities, towns, neighbourhoods and college campuses. You will see clusters of African-Americans over here, clusters of Hispanics over there, and clusters of “whites” sitting or standing alone in the corner. This is not a function of mandated “apartheid”, but voluntary segregation. For many parts of America Martin Luther King’s dream has not come to pass. In fact, America is growing further apart, and “Coming Apart”, as Charles Murray’s book of that title suggests. In the words of Coloradan writer Mike Folkerth, “The United States is the most fractured society on earth — the most fractured culture.”
The make-believe world that the media presents and the unrelenting torrent of state propaganda will not long conceal these facts. The spin-machine will not ultimately succeed in perpetuating the “Diversity Illusion”, as British author Ed West calls it, no more than the communist state of Yugoslavia succeeded in convincing its citizens and the world at large that its ethnic blocs were living in blissful harmony.
Multiculturalists, of course, insist that Canada is unique. That Canada can make multiculturalism work: That so far it is a roaring success, and is a model for the world to follow. That those who say otherwise are a delusional fringe without credibility, people who need to be excluded from public forums, ostracized or even punished for spreading “hateful” messages. Rather than acknowledge the inherent division that exists between incompatible ethnic groups, they accuse those who point out this division as divisive!
The communist establishment in the Soviet bloc said similar things about dissidents: That they were insane. That they should be detained in prison or confined to mental asylums. They were tiny anti-social elements who disputed what was obvious: That the socialist state was a Workers’ Paradise where all ethnic groups got along.
But suddenly in the late 1980s and early 1990s the truth came out. The command economy had been a failure, socialism wasn’t working and ethnic nationalism was alive and well.
The silenced majority never did buy into the state myth. Seventy years of trying to change human nature proved futile. “In-group” favouritism, a manifestation of which is “ethnic nepotism”, is built right into our brains. As Australian sociologist, and author of Genetic Interests, Frank Salter, might say, we are “hard-wired” to bond with people very much like ourselves, to identify with them, and to join with them in pursuing our collective interests.
One would think that Canadian politicians would have taken notice. No Canadian government ever had a mandate to change the ethnic profile of the nation. What Prime Minister Mackenzie King said in 1947 is still true today: “…the people of Canada do not wish, as a result of mass immigration, to make a fundamental alteration in the character of our population.” Unfortunately, Pierre Elliot Trudeau and the Prime Ministers who followed him paid no heed to public opinion in this area, or affected any interest in what the majority of Canadian wished. Once Trudeau instituted Official Multiculturalism in 1971, it soon became a bipartisan policy, a state religion that could not be questioned. And for good measure, it was even entrenched in the Constitution and in the mandates of federal public sector institutions, including, most crucially, the CBC.
Objective observers of recent Canadian history could be forgiven if they concluded that multicultural lobbyists are intent on denying that Canada’s European heritage has any significance, or that Euro-Canadians have any claim to represent the foundational core of the country. The aim is to marginalize them. That’s why many of these multicultural propagandists are conditioned to think of Europeans as interlopers, a bunch of land-robbers — nothing more, nothing less.
It’s time that Canadians know the truth. Europeans founded this nation. And their descendants have no intention of surrendering it.
Fish From Vietnam? Dirty Water, Iffy Fish!Fish from VietnamA MUST SEE VIDEO!!! EAT FISH????If it has Viet Nam on the package I never buy it – fish or any seafood!
Always thought of Agent Orange run off! Think about it then watch this!
Canadians pay and are kept in the dark. The press isn’t allowed near the latest crowd of Syrian “refugees” ensconced at the Howard Johnson’s in Fredericton. The authorities and the multiculti organizers are keeping the press away. The Canadian taxpayers must pay but are not entitled to know the facts much less have a say. “Lisa Bamford, executive director of the Multicultural Association of Fredericton, which is in charge of the project, described the refugees as ‘vulnerable people’ whose privacy must be protected. ‘They are not commodities,” she said Tuesday as dozens of men, women and children milled about the lobby of the resort on the Saint John River. ‘We
have to respect and protect their privacy.’
Bamford declined to say how many refugees were staying at the resort, where
they came from, how long they were expected to stay or how many more were
expected to arrive.”
The insolence of the immigration industry! What privacy? The Syrians chose to accept Canada’s charity. And they can’t grant an interview. “Vulnerable people”? How? they are safe in Canada. Note the average family has five children! Likely these people will impose an even heavier burden on the Canadian taxpayer. “Vulnerable people”? The only victims here are the Canadian taxpayers!
Paul Fromm
And they said Harper and crew were evasive and secretive. I guess when you’re in a constant state of SNAFU, you have to resort to this. And Elmer Fudd
The last time I looked, I was Canadian and I neither support nor condone what these goddamned “Liberals” are doing to this country by their thoughtless actions.
AND the BEAT goes on …… Ahaaaaaaaa and Trudeau wants transparency ??? BULL**** I say!
Local officials are restricting journalists’ access to the site, citing
“privacy concerns“.Always a handy reference when you’re trying to stonewall.
FRENCH VILLAGE, N.B. – More than 100 Syrian refugees have arrived at a
resort hotel west of Fredericton in the past week, but the group in charge
isn’t saying how long they will stay or how many more are expected.
Local officials are restricting journalists’ access to the site, citing
privacy concerns.
Lisa Bamford, executive director of the Multicultural Association of
Fredericton, which is in charge of the project, described the refugees as
“vulnerable people” whose privacy must be protected.
“They are not commodities,” she said Tuesday as dozens of men, women and
children milled about the lobby of the resort on the Saint John River. “We
have to respect and protect their privacy.”
Bamford declined to say how many refugees were staying at the resort, where
they came from, how long they were expected to stay or how many more were
expected to arrive.
Earlier this week, a local media report said that as of last Wednesday,
dozens of Syrian refugees were arriving daily at the 14-hectare resort,
which is typically experiencing slow business at this time of year.
General manager Shane Hashemi told the Fredericton Gleaner there were 90
refugees at the resort by last weekend and up to 250 in total were expected
to arrive in the days ahead, filling the hotel to capacity.
Hashemi said extra cribs and playpens were brought in because the average
family has an average of five children in tow. He is also quoted as saying
security guards were hired to make sure the children don’t go near the river
or the highway.
The secrecy at the resort stands in contrast to the very public displays
that Canadians have witnessed in recent months as thousands of refugees have
been welcomed to 260 communities across the country.
On Dec. 11, 2015, the first group of Syrian refugees airlifted to Canada
checked in to their Toronto hotel, but not before they were met by Prime
Minister Justin Trudeau, Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne and a large group of
reporters and photographers.
Immigration Minister John McCallum was at Toronto’s Pearson airport Feb. 29
as the last two government-arranged refugee flights arrived as part of the
Liberals’ $678-million settlement plan.
Some settlement agencies have said housing remains the biggest challenge.
Charities providing furniture to the refugees, meanwhile, have said they
struggle to keep up with demand.
In late February, the federal government issued a tender for 150 hotel rooms
in Fredericton area to house refugees.
As of March 1, 26,166 refugees have arrived in Canada, according to the
federal government.
The Canadian government reached its goal of bringing 25,000 Syrian refugees
to Canada by the end of February, but more are expected to arrive in the
months ahead. The government pledged to resettle a total of 25,000
government-assisted Syrians by the end of the year, and have about 10,000
more to bring.
Nancy Caron, a spokeswoman with Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship
Canada, said refugees’ stay in temporary accommodations can vary from days
to several weeks.
Caron said more than 60% of government-supported Syrian refugees nationally
are now living in permanent accommodations, and that will increase quickly
now that the flow of new arrivals is slowing.
An estimated 4.7 million Syrians have registered as refugees since the
outbreak of the Syrian civil war in 2011, but the UN refugee agency is not
seeking permanent new homes for that many.
The UN has reached out to countries to take in the refugees and only Germany
has made more official spaces formally available than Canada.
Michael MacDonald, The Canadian Press
Liberal Gov’t Defies Will of Canadians & Continues to Import More Syrians into Canada
by Brad Salzberg
McCallum to reveal new refugee numbers by March 9
“Liberals on track to bring in 25,000 Syrian refugees by end of next week, with between 35,000 and 50,000 expected this year.”
More than 70% of Canadians think Liberals’ new refugee target is too high: poll”
“Figures released by the government on Tuesday show that Immigration, Citizenship and Refugees Canada expects to spend an additional $179.3 million in 2016-17 in implementing the Liberals Syrian refugee push.”
Brad: Isn’t it rather interesting that the Liberal-Islamic Party of Canada have never actually told the Canadian public WHY they are so hell-bent– despite the fact that polls indicate Canadians are opposed to the initiative– on importing Islam and the refugees into our country?
Culture Wars: The Battle For The Soul Of Canada
· The secret population change plan and how it’s being implemented
· Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi a name you should know – architect of national destruction








