Tag Archives: Charles Burton

Insights Into The Desmarais Clan’s Disturbing China Connexion

Posted on by

Insights Into The Desmarais Clan’s Disturbing China Connexion

Zhu Rongji Went Off Script Beside Chrétien and Desmarais to Call Canada China’s “Best Friend”—Then Beijing Omitted RecordThe Canadian diplomat who took notes at the 1998 dinner says Zhu’s “best friend” declaration was left out of Beijing’s published account, and that the eagle in his famous warning was not America.

Sam CooperAug 18 




OTTAWA — Chinese premier Zhu Rongji discarded a prepared speech at a 1998 dinner in Beijing and spontaneously declared Canada to be China’s “best friend” while seated directly between prime minister Jean Chrétien and Chrétien’s son-in-law, Power Corporation executive André Desmarais, according to the Canadian diplomat assigned to record Zhu’s remarks.But Zhu’s declaration did not appear in the account published by the Chinese Communist Party’s flagship newspaper, People’s Daily.Charles Burton, the veteran diplomat and China scholar who attended the dinner as an official note-taker, told The Bureau Tuesday that People’s Daily instead published Zhu’s unused prepared speech the following day. Its account also omitted Zhu’s off-the-cuff response to a Time magazine profile warning that his aggressive economic reforms had carried him dangerously close to the political sun.Burton disclosed the circumstances after reading Desmarais’s tribute to Zhu, published in La Presse and The Globe and Mail following Zhu’s death on August 12 at 97.Zhu’s death drew tributes from around the world to the technocrat who led China into the World Trade Organization and helped transform the country into the world’s factory. Desmarais’s tribute stands apart among them, both for its intimacy and for what it says about relations between Beijing, Ottawa and Washington.It is also illuminating for Canadians seeking to understand Ottawa’s long-standing approach to Communist China—and the influence of a Montreal corporate and political network that championed deeper engagement with Beijing.Desmarais describes Zhu as an uncle-like figure, mentor and intimate friend. Burton’s account provides a rare firsthand window into how the statement underpinning that narrative was actually delivered.“The text [of] Zhu’s upcoming dinner speech was placed at each table setting,” Burton recalled. “I got out a sharpened pencil to note if he left any of it out or added any asides.”“Then Zhu completely ignored the prepared text.”Burton was also struck by Zhu’s position at the table.André Desmarais was then head of the Canada China Business Council, Burton said. Jean Chrétien, the Canadian prime minister, was his father-in-law.The Chinese premier sat directly between them.“I am pretty sure that the CCP took the father-in-law/son-in-law [relationship] as a significant factor,” Burton wrote in comments to The Bureau.“I was a bit thrown to see Premier of the State Council Zhu dead centre between them.”The tableau compressed a powerful Canada–China network into a single seating arrangement: the Chinese premier, Canada’s head of government and a leading member of the Montreal corporate dynasty that had spent years developing commercial and political relationships with Beijing.Power Corporation was among the Canadian companies that founded the Canada China Business Council in 1978. Paul Desmarais served as its founding chairman. André Desmarais later led the organization and remains its honorary chairman.Desmarais also recalls Zhu warning in a speech that an eagle flying too close to the sun would burn and be reduced to ashes. Everyone present, Desmarais writes, understood the eagle to represent the United States, and Canada to be the steady partner on which China could rely.The anecdote casts America as the arrogant power destined to fall, while Canada emerges as Beijing’s trusted and dependable alternative. That interpretation has immediate resonance as Prime Minister Mark Carney holds last-minute talks with Washington to avert threatened 50 percent American tariffs.But Burton says there was no reference to the United States in Zhu’s remarks that night.The eagle was Zhu himself.Less than a month before Chrétien’s November 1998 visit, Time published a profile titled China’s Missing Pieces. It compared powerful men to Icarus and identified Zhu as China’s most daring “highflyer”—a reformer in danger of crashing under political resistance, unemployment and unrest.At the dinner, Burton said, Zhu jokingly rebutted that characterization. Seated between Chrétien and Desmarais, he suggested that the Canadian prime minister could see Zhu had neither burnt feathers nor the smell of roasted chicken.“The Icarus metaphor of ‘flying too close to the sun’ was famously applied to Zhu Rongji by Time magazine in October 1998,” Burton said.“There was no reference to the United States in Mr. Zhu’s remarks that night. None of his refuting of the Time Magazine piece or his Canada is best friend of China assertion made it into the official record,” Burton said.For Burton, the 1998 dinner was emblematic of something larger.“Zhu Rongji’s premiership marked the golden age of highly lucrative relationships between the Canadian Laurentian elite and Chinese Communist business networks,” he told The Bureau.Under Xi Jinping’s neo-Leninist redirection of China’s political economy, Burton added, a new mercantilism focused on domestic investment has taken hold, and Canadian industrialists are no longer the “valued partners and friends” they may have naively believed themselves to be 30 years ago.Nearly three decades after Burton saw Chrétien seated beside Zhu and Desmarais, the former prime minister was again in Beijing, The Bureau has reported.On the eve of Carney’s January 2026 visit, former Canadian diplomat Michael Kovrig drew attention to Chrétien’s private meeting with Chinese Vice-President Han Zheng only days before Carney’s arrival.Kovrig described Chrétien as a possible “warm-up act” for the official mission. He emphasized Chrétien’s close connections to Power Corporation and the CCBC and characterized the circumstances as a possible effort by “certain business interests to deepen trade and investment.”“Canadians should watch closely what sort of dealmaking follows,” Kovrig said, as reported by The Bureau.Brian Lee Crowley of the Macdonald-Laurier Institute has recounted an even blunter warning.Crowley said the late David Kilgour told him that, upon becoming minister of state for Asia-Pacific under Chrétien, Kilgour received a visit from a representative of the Prime Minister’s Office.“Our policy toward China, he was told in no uncertain terms, is set not at our foreign ministry or the PMO, but at the headquarters of Power Corporation in Montreal,” Crowley wrote.That is Crowley’s account of Kilgour’s recollection, but the relationships themselves are documented.

It’s Time to Take Defence of the Canadian Arctic Seriously — Get the Ships & Planes We Need Now! “China’s intent to dominate the Arctic region of North America is of increasing priority for the Xi Jinping regime.” Charles Burton, Former Canadian Ambassador to Red China

Posted on by

China to Wage War on America from the Arctic

by Gordon G. Chang

Translations of this item:

  • This month, Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post reported that the Shanghai-based Polar Research Institute of China revealed that “China has completed the field testing and evaluation of an underwater listening device that will be deployed on a large scale in the Arctic Ocean.”
  • The innocuous-sounding report tells us that China intends to wage war against the United States and Canada from the Arctic.
  • Other than this buoy, the institute said, China had “never planted a listening device there.”
  • That assertion is not truthful. Last fall, the Canadian military, according to Canada’s Globe and Mail in February, removed buoys placed by China in Canadian waters in the Arctic.
  • “China is now covertly preparing the groundwork for militarization of the largely undefended northern territory and critical Arctic sea routes.” — Charles Burton of the Ottawa-based Macdonald-Laurier Institute, to Gatestone, July 2023.
  • All of this data is needed to listen for submarines, specifically American ones. China wants to track and destroy American subs from the top of the world before they can flood into Asian waters.
  • The U.S.’s generous “engagement” approach to China has resulted in China obtaining observer status in the Arctic Council although no Chinese territory is in or near the Arctic.
  • China already has two permanent research stations in the Arctic, one in Norway and the other in Iceland. That is two too many.
  • [F]or China the Arctic is primarily a military domain. In addition to the buoys they are leaving in the Arctic, the Chinese are surveilling the area by air. The spy balloon that flew over the lower 48 states this year initially crossed into Alaska and Western Canada.
  • China is not only pressing the United States and Canada from the north. In the other direction, China is establishing military bases in South America and the Caribbean and is infiltrating saboteurs across the border with Mexico. The Biden administration is allowing a hostile state to go hard against America from all sides. A menacing China is now everywhere in the Western Hemisphere.
[F]or China the Arctic is primarily a military domain. In addition to the buoys they are leaving in the Arctic, the Chinese are surveilling the area by air. Pictured: The Chinese research vessel and ice-breaker Xuelong arrives in China’s Fujian province on June 27, 2010, in preparation for sailing to the Arctic. (Photo by STR/AFP via Getty Images)

This month, Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post reported that the Shanghai-based Polar Research Institute of China revealed that “China has completed the field testing and evaluation of an underwater listening device that will be deployed on a large scale in the Arctic Ocean.”

The innocuous-sounding report tells us that China intends to wage war against the United States and Canada from the Arctic.

China had installed the “polar subglacial shallow surface acoustic monitoring buoy system” on floating ice in the Arctic on August 9, 2021. Information obtained by the device was uplinked to Chinese satellites.

The research institute, a Chinese central government agency that “plans and coordinates China’s polar activities,” stated that the devices could be used for “subglacial communication, navigation and positioning, target detection, and the reconstruction of marine environmental parameters.” This buoy “can be massively used in the construction of the Arctic Ocean environmental monitoring network.”

Other than this buoy, the institute said, China had “never planted a listening device there.”

That assertion is not truthful. Last fall, the Canadian military, according to Canada’s Globe and Mail in February, removed buoys placed by China in Canadian waters in the Arctic.

Not much is known about the removed Chinese devices. Pierre LeBlanc, a former commander of the Canadian armed forces in the Arctic, told Voice of America that Canada has not revealed the location of the removed buoys or their type, but it is nonetheless apparent the Chinese military placed them in or near Canada’s Northwest Passage without permission.

“China’s intent to dominate the Arctic region of North America is of increasing priority for the Xi Jinping regime,” Charles Burton of the Ottawa-based Macdonald-Laurier Institute told Gatestone. “Moving forward from the illogical assertion that China is a ‘near-Arctic nation’ and Xi’s touting of the ‘Polar Silk Road,’ China is now covertly preparing the groundwork for militarization of the largely undefended northern territory and critical Arctic sea routes.”

Retired Lieutenant-General Michael Day told the Globe and Mail that China’s buoys would likely have been mapping environmental conditions such as seabeds and ice thickness. Buoys can also monitor ice movement, ocean currents, water temperature, and salinity.

All of this data is needed to listen for submarines, specifically American ones. China wants to track and destroy American subs from the top of the world before they can flood into Asian waters.

The frozen Arctic is a hot topic these days, and China is trying to control it. The Polar Research Institute of China attempted to buy an airport in Lapland, Finland, but under U.S. pressure the government there blocked the purchase.

In addition, a Chinese state mining company attempted to buy land close to a facility maintained by the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), the joint Canada-U.S. military command that provides early warning. That purchase was also stopped.

“Since the advent of the Cold War, the Arctic has been the domain of two nuclear powers, the United States of America and the Soviet Union, now the Russian Federation,” said James Fanell of the Geneva Centre for Security Policy to this publication. “These two states demonstrated an understanding of the balance of power and observed an uneasy truce within the waters of the Arctic. Since 2017, the People’s Republic of China, led by Xi Jinping, has made it clear it covets access to the Arctic and recognition of its major-power status there.”

China has, Fanell points out, announced three Blue Economic Corridors, one of which includes the Arctic. These corridors are part of Xi’s worldwide Belt and Road Initiative.

Unlike Moscow and Washington, Beijing, with its forays into the Arctic, is upending stability. As Fanell, also a former U.S. Navy captain who served as Director of Intelligence and Information Operations at the U.S. Pacific Fleet, points out, “Beijing arrogantly believes they deserve a place in the Arctic Council to ‘call the shots’ and expand Chinese influence and access to this vital region atop the planet.”

The U.S.’s generous “engagement” approach to China has resulted in China obtaining observer status in the Arctic Council although no Chinese territory is in or near the Arctic.

There are eight states with territory inside the Arctic Circle. With the exceptions of Russia and Sweden, all are NATO members. This year, Sweden should join that alliance.

Moreover, the five Arctic littoral states—the Arctic Five of Canada, Denmark, Norway, Russia, and the United States—are all NATO members other than Russia. This gives America the ability to determine outcomes in the Arctic, especially if Washington were to oppose China’s initiatives, as it of course should.

China already has two permanent research stations in the Arctic, one in Norway and the other in Iceland. That is two too many.

The Chinese know the value of the Arctic. Warming temperatures are melting Arctic ice, making drilling and mining in the region more feasible. Moreover, melting ice opens up shorter routes for container ships and other vessels.

Yet for China, the Arctic is primarily a military domain. In addition to the buoys they are leaving in the Arctic, the Chinese are surveilling the area by air. The spy balloon that flew over the lower 48 states this year initially crossed into Alaska and Western Canada.

China is not only pressing the United States and Canada from the north. In the other direction, China is establishing military bases in South America and the Caribbean and is infiltrating saboteurs across the border with Mexico. The Biden administration is allowing a hostile state to go hard against America from all sides. A menacing China is now everywhere in the Western Hemisphere.

Gordon G. Chang is the author of The Coming Collapse of China, a Gatestone Institute distinguished senior fellow, and a member of its Advisory Board.

Chinese Employee of Hydro Quebec Arrested for Economic Espionage

Posted on by

Chinese Employee of Hydro Quebec Arrested for Economic Espionage

Below are details of the arrest in mid-November of a Hydro Quebec employee, one Yuesheng Wang for spying — economic espionage — for Red China. Interestingly, he wasn’t caught by the Mounties — the Mounties don’t ‘always get their man” — but by Hydro Quebec security. Charles Burton, a former professor of Political Science at Brock University and now a Senior Fellow with the Macdonald Laurier Institute told Toronto 1010 Talk Radio (November 16): “Canada doesn’t have the resources or political will to root out” Red Chinese espionage.

“A former employee of Hydro-Québec made a first appearance in court Tuesday on charges that he fraudulently obtained a trade secret for the benefit of China, and he was ordered to remain detained ahead of a bail hearing. Yuesheng Wang, 35, appeared in Quebec court in Longueuil by videoconference and was assisted by a translator. Wang was detained at the RCMP’s headquarters in Montreal.

The resident of Candiac, on Montreal’s South Shore, is the first person in Canada to be charged with economic espionage under the Security of Information Act. Wang was also formally charged on Tuesday with three violations of the Criminal Code: using a computer fraudulently and without authorization; obtaining a trade secret by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means; and breach of trust.

Federal prosecutor Marc Cigana objected to bail in Wang’s case.“It’s our opinion, after studying all the circumstances and the evidence, that Mr. Wang is a flight risk,” Cigana told reporters after the court hearing.

Wang is alleged to have committed the crimes between Jan. 1, 2018 and Aug. 22, 2022, in the course of his duties at Hydro-Québec. Three of the four charges each carry a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison. The breach of trust charge carries a maximum five-year sentence. The RCMP alleges that Wang conducted research for Chinese research centres and a Chinese university and that he published scientific articles and filed patents with them rather than with the Quebec utility. Police also alleged he used information without his employer’s consent, harming Hydro-Québec’s intellectual property.

The RCMP said its national security enforcement team began an investigation in August after receiving a complaint from Hydro-Québec’s corporate security branch.

Wang, who has a limited knowledge of English and does not speak French, shook his head as the charges were translated into Mandarin for him in court on Tuesday.[Little English; no French — how did this guy get into Canada? Who specifically — the bureaucrats name, please — was responsible?]He tried to have his bail hearing held immediately, but was advised by his lawyer to delay. Quebec court Judge Anne-Marie Beauchemin ordered Wang remanded to a detention centre.

 The case was put off until Friday, when more evidence will be disclosed and when the parties will discuss scheduling a bail hearing. Neither lawyer could say following Tuesday’s hearing whether Wang has Canadian citizenship. [Isn’t that a rather important point?]

Wesley Wark, an expert on national security and intelligence issues, said the Wang case isn’t the first economic espionage incident in the country but is the first case that has led to charges under the 21-year-old Security of Information Act. Wark, a senior fellow at the think tank Centre for International Governance Innovation, said the case is “unusual.” …

‘It takes us into the world of university research and university publications, and it’s an important area to wade into, but also very complex in terms of being able to then reach back and pin an economic espionage charge against him.’  The definition of “trade secret” is very broad, Wark said, which may make the case difficult to prove in court. He said the charges demonstrate that much of the espionage activity in Canada is occurring outside the orbit of the federal government and within the private sector.

Hydro-Québec said Wang was a researcher who worked on battery materials with the Centre of Excellence in Transportation Electrification and Energy Storage, known as CETEES. The centre develops technology for electric vehicles and for energy-storage systems.

In a statement, the utility said its security team launched a probe before it called federal authorities, adding that Wang has been fired. Wang, Hydro-Québec noted, didn’t have access to the utility’s “core mission,” and it said his access was revoked when suspicions arose.” (Montreal Gazette, November 15, 2022)

It’s maddening that we aren’t allowed even to know Wang’s citizenship status. How did this person who speaks no French and little English even qualify to immigrate to Canada? The issue of double loyalty may be a political hand grenade. We’re not even allowed to ask the question. So, let’s put it a little differently. Shouldn’t Chinese immigrants, especially those from Red China, have to give strong evidence of their loyalty to Canada before being accepted? The few immigrants from Taiwan are mostly fiercely anti-communist as are many from Hong Kong. Red China is a different matter. Some immigrants are anti-communist. Some come here for a better and much cheaper education and a much cleaner environment than the Chinese Mainland. Many remain fiercely proud of China which is now an economic powerhouse and a resurgent military power. It’s these people who are susceptible to calls to help Red China through espionage.

  • A week later, we discovered a little more about the alleged spy: “Wang, a Chinese national on a work visa for his job with the Quebec utility, put up his suburban Montreal home and a downtown condominium as an assurance he would remain in Canada.” (National Post, November 25, 2022) Why was he granted a work visa? What security check was done on him? How did this 35-year old amass so much property? Was he getting by frugally on a bowl of rice and crickets per day?

Charles Burton warns:  “The [Red Chinese] propaganda campaign, which includes conspiracy theories promulgated by pro-Beijing Chinese language media in Canada, threatens our democracy. It already cost Canadian [Conservative] MPs of Chinese heritage their seats in the last election, and because we do nothing about it, we can expect more in the next election. The Chinese-language media’s hate-mongering includes accusations of pervasive racism against everybody in Canada with Chinese ancestry. Readers of China’s WeChat and other platforms are implored to respond by identifying with the Motherland and becoming loyal to the Chinese Communist Party.

Canada seems incapable of doing anything about China, due to the incompatibility of the Ottawa doctrine that we must maintain close relations with Beijing regardless of public opinion. When China’s ambassador in Ottawa threatened Canada about crossing a ‘red line’ on Taiwan, warning officials to draw lessons from the past (read: hostage diplomacy) if our MPs set foot in Taiwan, our prime minister didn’t even condemn the remarks, but simply urged MPs to reflect on the ‘consequences’ of such a visit.” (Toronto Star, August 28, 2022)