Tag Archives: Power Corporation

Insights Into The Desmarais Clan’s Disturbing China Connexion

Posted on by

Insights Into The Desmarais Clan’s Disturbing China Connexion

Zhu Rongji Went Off Script Beside Chrétien and Desmarais to Call Canada China’s “Best Friend”—Then Beijing Omitted RecordThe Canadian diplomat who took notes at the 1998 dinner says Zhu’s “best friend” declaration was left out of Beijing’s published account, and that the eagle in his famous warning was not America.

Sam CooperAug 18 




OTTAWA — Chinese premier Zhu Rongji discarded a prepared speech at a 1998 dinner in Beijing and spontaneously declared Canada to be China’s “best friend” while seated directly between prime minister Jean Chrétien and Chrétien’s son-in-law, Power Corporation executive André Desmarais, according to the Canadian diplomat assigned to record Zhu’s remarks.But Zhu’s declaration did not appear in the account published by the Chinese Communist Party’s flagship newspaper, People’s Daily.Charles Burton, the veteran diplomat and China scholar who attended the dinner as an official note-taker, told The Bureau Tuesday that People’s Daily instead published Zhu’s unused prepared speech the following day. Its account also omitted Zhu’s off-the-cuff response to a Time magazine profile warning that his aggressive economic reforms had carried him dangerously close to the political sun.Burton disclosed the circumstances after reading Desmarais’s tribute to Zhu, published in La Presse and The Globe and Mail following Zhu’s death on August 12 at 97.Zhu’s death drew tributes from around the world to the technocrat who led China into the World Trade Organization and helped transform the country into the world’s factory. Desmarais’s tribute stands apart among them, both for its intimacy and for what it says about relations between Beijing, Ottawa and Washington.It is also illuminating for Canadians seeking to understand Ottawa’s long-standing approach to Communist China—and the influence of a Montreal corporate and political network that championed deeper engagement with Beijing.Desmarais describes Zhu as an uncle-like figure, mentor and intimate friend. Burton’s account provides a rare firsthand window into how the statement underpinning that narrative was actually delivered.“The text [of] Zhu’s upcoming dinner speech was placed at each table setting,” Burton recalled. “I got out a sharpened pencil to note if he left any of it out or added any asides.”“Then Zhu completely ignored the prepared text.”Burton was also struck by Zhu’s position at the table.André Desmarais was then head of the Canada China Business Council, Burton said. Jean Chrétien, the Canadian prime minister, was his father-in-law.The Chinese premier sat directly between them.“I am pretty sure that the CCP took the father-in-law/son-in-law [relationship] as a significant factor,” Burton wrote in comments to The Bureau.“I was a bit thrown to see Premier of the State Council Zhu dead centre between them.”The tableau compressed a powerful Canada–China network into a single seating arrangement: the Chinese premier, Canada’s head of government and a leading member of the Montreal corporate dynasty that had spent years developing commercial and political relationships with Beijing.Power Corporation was among the Canadian companies that founded the Canada China Business Council in 1978. Paul Desmarais served as its founding chairman. André Desmarais later led the organization and remains its honorary chairman.Desmarais also recalls Zhu warning in a speech that an eagle flying too close to the sun would burn and be reduced to ashes. Everyone present, Desmarais writes, understood the eagle to represent the United States, and Canada to be the steady partner on which China could rely.The anecdote casts America as the arrogant power destined to fall, while Canada emerges as Beijing’s trusted and dependable alternative. That interpretation has immediate resonance as Prime Minister Mark Carney holds last-minute talks with Washington to avert threatened 50 percent American tariffs.But Burton says there was no reference to the United States in Zhu’s remarks that night.The eagle was Zhu himself.Less than a month before Chrétien’s November 1998 visit, Time published a profile titled China’s Missing Pieces. It compared powerful men to Icarus and identified Zhu as China’s most daring “highflyer”—a reformer in danger of crashing under political resistance, unemployment and unrest.At the dinner, Burton said, Zhu jokingly rebutted that characterization. Seated between Chrétien and Desmarais, he suggested that the Canadian prime minister could see Zhu had neither burnt feathers nor the smell of roasted chicken.“The Icarus metaphor of ‘flying too close to the sun’ was famously applied to Zhu Rongji by Time magazine in October 1998,” Burton said.“There was no reference to the United States in Mr. Zhu’s remarks that night. None of his refuting of the Time Magazine piece or his Canada is best friend of China assertion made it into the official record,” Burton said.For Burton, the 1998 dinner was emblematic of something larger.“Zhu Rongji’s premiership marked the golden age of highly lucrative relationships between the Canadian Laurentian elite and Chinese Communist business networks,” he told The Bureau.Under Xi Jinping’s neo-Leninist redirection of China’s political economy, Burton added, a new mercantilism focused on domestic investment has taken hold, and Canadian industrialists are no longer the “valued partners and friends” they may have naively believed themselves to be 30 years ago.Nearly three decades after Burton saw Chrétien seated beside Zhu and Desmarais, the former prime minister was again in Beijing, The Bureau has reported.On the eve of Carney’s January 2026 visit, former Canadian diplomat Michael Kovrig drew attention to Chrétien’s private meeting with Chinese Vice-President Han Zheng only days before Carney’s arrival.Kovrig described Chrétien as a possible “warm-up act” for the official mission. He emphasized Chrétien’s close connections to Power Corporation and the CCBC and characterized the circumstances as a possible effort by “certain business interests to deepen trade and investment.”“Canadians should watch closely what sort of dealmaking follows,” Kovrig said, as reported by The Bureau.Brian Lee Crowley of the Macdonald-Laurier Institute has recounted an even blunter warning.Crowley said the late David Kilgour told him that, upon becoming minister of state for Asia-Pacific under Chrétien, Kilgour received a visit from a representative of the Prime Minister’s Office.“Our policy toward China, he was told in no uncertain terms, is set not at our foreign ministry or the PMO, but at the headquarters of Power Corporation in Montreal,” Crowley wrote.That is Crowley’s account of Kilgour’s recollection, but the relationships themselves are documented.

Liberal-China Collusion Dates Back 50 Years To Election Of Pierre Trudeau

Posted on by

Liberal-China Collusion Dates Back 50 Years To Election Of Pierre Trudeau

In terms of Canada-China relations, Canadian media has never pointed to an obvious connection between Pierre & Justin Trudeau.

Brad SalzbergMar 2

It was in the year 1971 that ex-Liberal Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau first engaged with the communist government of China. A series of meetings with Chairman Mao Tse Tung on Chinese soil set the course for what emerged a half-century later: exposure of the Chinese government’s interference in the past two Canadian federal elections.

The idea that no connection exists between communist enthusiast Pierre and current PM Justin Trudeau is something both government and media wish to keep hidden from awareness of the Canadian people.

Cultural Action Party has, in one form or another, spent past 30 years attempting to expose the nature of this covert relationship. For brevity’s sake, we stick with fundamentals that Canadians are likely unaware of:

— Canada’s relationship with China is old. It began with cooperation between Bank of Montreal(BMO) and the Bank of China in the late 1800’s.

— As far back as the early 1900’s, the government of China were integrating themselves into Canada’s education system. 

— In 1971, approximately eight months after meeting with Chairman Mao, Pierre Trudeau cancelled Canada’s bi-cultural English & French Canadian identity. The degree of input from the Canadian people amounted to a total of nothing. Devoid of public consent, PET forced multiculturalism upon an unsuspecting, and largely naive, Canadian public.

The first wave of immigration in the wake of Canada’s nascent cultural transformation were Chinese migrants. To this day, media have eschewed the fact that financial donations from the Chinese government resulted in a reorientation of the Canadian education system.

Marxist philosophy infiltration of our universities kick-started a trend brought to a pinnacle by current PM Justin Trudeau: the fine art of national self-loathing. The outcome was the downfall of national pride in country. Say no-go to “1-2-3 Canadians we love thee,” as manifest in promotional campaigns for Montreal’s Expo 1967. Transitioning to self-hatred time in Canada, Pierre Trudeau set the stage for globalization of our country.

Fast forward to the 1980’s, and we discover the establishment of the Canada-China Business Council. This is the point when modern Canada became economically integrated with the business interests of the government of China. Influence and control of Canadian politics was now waiting in the wings.

Reviewing the history of CCBC exposes a tangible partnership between the Trudeau family and Power Corporation, owned by the billionaire Demarais family of Quebec. The board of directors of China-China Business Council offers up multiple executives drawn from Bank of Montreal[BMO] as well as Power Corporation. Quebec-centric corporations such as Bombardier and SNC Lavalin would benefit greatly from these associations.

Thus, the economic partnership between the Liberal “Laurentian Mountain Elite” and communist China was born. Then came Justin Trudeau.

Canada and China have decided to begin exploratory discussions of a possible free trade agreement (FTA). These discussions will enable Canada to determine what issues or areas could be included in a potential agreement, and whether there is sufficient interest or economic benefits to pursue an FTA.

Thus stated Liberal Cabinet member Francois Philippe-Champagne, card-carrying Laurentian Mountain elite, and holder of mortgages from the Bank Of China.

The Canada-China Free Trade Agreement did not come to fruition. A darn good thing, because the details were so biased toward a benefit to China one might believe the Liberals were selling Canada to the communist behemoth nation in totality.

Of course, the Liberals were far from finished in their pursuits. China continued to ramp up power and influence within Canadian society. Despite warnings from CSIS regarding infiltration of Chinese spies and hacking private government data, PM Justin Trudeau approved the following:

“The government of Canada has awarded an estimated $6.8 million contract to a state-owned Chinese company to supply security equipment for 170 embassies,consulates and high commissions around the globe.”

Hear ye, hear ye: “Justin Trudeau facilitates China’s infiltration of Canada in the spirit of so-called father Pierre Trudeau.”

Of course, no one heard this message, because media has never pointed to a blatant, obvious connection between Pierre & Justin Trudeau in term of Canada-China relations, or anything else.

Why not? It wasn’t until 2023, when exposure of China’s federal election interference occurred, that mainstream media were finally forced to open the gates to the flooding of Canada by the government of China.

OTTAWA – March 1st, 2023: The Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation says it is returning $200,000 it received seven years ago after a media report alleged a potential connection to Beijing.

“The Globe and Mail, citing an unnamed national security source, published a report on an alleged plot by the Chinese government to influence Justin Trudeau after he became Liberal leader.”

“The report alleged a Chinese billionaire was instructed by Beijing to donate $1 million to the Trudeau Foundation in 2014, the year before the Liberals came to power under Trudeau.”

Upon which we expand the parameters of political collusion:

According to an article from the National Post, foreign donations to the Pierre Trudeau Foundation began to skyrocket after Justin Trudeau was elected prime minister in 2015.

“Between 2014-2016, donations from non-Canadian sources increased from $53 million to $535 million– an increase of one thousand percent.”

The cat comes out of the bag. PM Trudeau and the Liberals are cast into hot water, and may not survive a scandal existing as a culmination of a 50-year covert relationship between China and the Liberal Party.

Or will they? Can this situation exist as a litmus test for a concept CAP has been advancing since our formation in 2016? Our theory goes like this:

Not only are Justin Trudeau and the Liberals in bed with the government of China. They are also emulating their style of governance. Contemporary Canada exists as a model of neo-communism as perpetrated by Justin Trudeau.

If he survives the scandal, would it not lend credence to the idea that Mr. Trudeau is, in fact, Canada first neo-dictator?