Tag Archives: Keir Starmer

The White Countries Have Become Rabidly Racist Against White People

Posted on by

he Burning Platform

The Burning Platform

The White Countries Have Become Rabidly Racist Against White People

Guest Post by Paul Craig Roberts

As I was writing this article several thousand British citizens were outside a police station in Southhampton, England, demanding accountability for the murder of a young white British student, Henry Nowak, by a black immigrant-invader and the white British police.

The black immigrant-invader murdered Nowak by stabbing him five times.  The white British police murdered Nowak by ignoring his testimony that he had been stabbed and what turned out to be Novak’s last words: “I can’t breathe.” The British police, trained as they successfully have been to see the white person as the aggressor, instead of arresting the black immigrant-invader who attacked Nowak, fatally as it turned out, the white British police arrested the dying Nowak, who died in police handcuffs.  The “racially sensitive trained” white British police believed the black immigrant-invader’s lie that Nowak had used a racial epithet.  They did not believe Nowak that he had been stabbed.  The “racially sensitive police” did not even look to see if Nowak had been stabbed.  Instead, they handcuffed a dying man and did not call for medical help.

You would think that this would be a scandal–and it was–but not for the right reason.  The rabidly anti-white white British prime minister Starmer characterized the several thousand white protesters, a small number in view of the enormity of the injustice, as “far-right rioters and racist thugs.” In other words, the Prime Minister of England sees racism not in the unprovoked deadly attack on the white Nowak by the black immigrant-invader, not in the British police’s ignoring of Nowak’s dying plea for help.  The white British Prime Minister Starmer sees racism in the British citizens’ protest about what has happened. Is there any lower form of pure political excrement than Starmer ?  How does a piece of political excrement such as Starmer survive as Prime Minister of Great Britain?

Now, let us ask ourselves how a white ethnic British Prime Minister from the Labour Party, which in former times prior to the despicable Tony Blair, represented the ethnic British working class, became indoctrinated and brainwashed to such an extreme extent that the racists in society are the white people who suffer from theft, rape, and murder by immigrant-invaders.?

Confront this fact: The excrement that serves as Prime Minister of Great Britain, formerly a great and reasonably moral country, has defined protest about a racist murder of a white British citizen to be “white racism.”

This is the position of white people  today.  In NO Western country do white ethnic citizens have the protection of law. Their own government is against them.

The UK, once an ethnic nation, now a Tower of Babel, has a “commitment to racial equality.”  What does it mean?  To quote the official answer, “it does not mean treating everyone ‘the same’ or being ‘color blind,’” it means limiting racism to white people.

No one but white people can be racists. This is the official position of the Starmer UK government. It was the official position of the Biden regime and the official position of all Western European governments. Trump prefers to hand over to Israel the power otherwise handed over to immigrant-invaders.

This is why the police automatically saw the murderer of Nowak as the victim and Nowak as the racist.

There are now in Britain, the US, Canada, and all of Europe organizations and intellectuals and even universities and pubic and private schools for children that are  dedicated to inculcating white ethnicities with the fact that they are racists, guilty of so many crimes against “people of color” that they must now step aside and accept retribution by accepting rule over them by the former oppressed peoples they allegedly exploited and brutalized, just as gentiles must give way to Jews to make up for the holocaust.

For several years I have reported  Scandinavian media accounts of white ethnic Swedish, Norwegian, and Danish women raped by immigrant-invader rape gangs.  For the most part, the women fear to report their rapes and gang rapes, often in public where the cowardly Scandinavian men hide their eyes, because they fear being accused of a hate crime by disrupting or reporting a rape of a white women by a black person. In Sweden, the rape of white ethnic Scandinavian women by black immigrants is almost a privilege protected by law. Europeans and British are punished for speaking against immigrant-invaders as Americans are for any criticism of Israel. 

If you are not convinced that the Western World is so anti-white that white ethnicities are demonized, consider this:

British nurseries  have been ordered to report “racist” three-year old toddlers to British police. In Britain white British 3-year-olds can be reported to the police for “hate crimes.”

Childcare workers in Wales have been told to call police on children as young as three if they are suspected of “racist” behavior, according to a new official guidance backed by the Labour government.

This policy introduced by Diversity and Anti‑Racist Professional Learning (DARPL), an anti-white organization that has received government funding, trains childcare workers to assess whether a child’s behavior could be deemed a “hate crime” and, if so, to call authorities.”

Multiculturalism has dissolved Great Britain into an anti-white cesspool.

https://www.rt.com/news/639530-uk-nurseries-racist-children/

Everywhere in the Western World white ethnicities have been brainwashed that they are evil, racist, and oppressive and must no longer stand in the way of  rule by immigrant-invaders.  And they don’t. The indoctrinated white people now elect immigrant-invaders to public office, including prosecuting attorneys who promptly went to work framing President Trump. The leader of the British Conservative Party is a black woman.

There are plenty of black leaders but no leaders of white people.  No white leader can arise, because by definition any support for a white leader is racist. Nowhere in the Western world can a white leader be found who is not being suppressed by his/her own white government.

Two-tier policing is now the norm in the Western world.  We are approaching the time when the only white people who exist will be in zoos as examples of white racist exploiters.

Racism matters…unless the victim is White

Posted on by

Racism matters…unless the victim is white

Thank you for becoming a valued subscriber. Your support fuels the fight for freedom, sovereignty, and common-sense conservatism, You’re helping us to deliver unfiltered truth, bold ideas, and the real news they don’t want you to hear.


Racism matters…unless the victim is white.

The tragic death of Henry Nowak has become a test of whether Western societies truly believe in equality.

Short on time? Here is a 5 dot point summary of my thoughts.

  • The muted reaction to Henry Nowak’s murder exposes a double standard in how racial incidents are treated when the victim is white.
  • Were the police too quick to believe allegations against Henry because they assumed the white person was the likely offender.
  • I contrast the global response to George Floyd’s death with the comparatively limited attention given to Henry Nowak’s case.
  • Has DEI ideology contributed to a culture in which concerns affecting white men are increasingly dismissed or ignored?
  • True equality requires opposing racism consistently, regardless of the race of either the victim or the perpetrator.


What’s a white life worth? Not much if you judge by the muted reaction to the stabbing murder of teenager Henry Nowak in the United Kingdom.

For years politicians, activists, corporations and media organisations have insisted that racism must be confronted wherever it appears.

Yet the reaction to the horrific death of this 18 year old has demonstrated in the starkest terms that racism against white people is considered a lesser form of discrimination.

Henry was stabbed with a 21 centimetre ceremonial sword wielded by an Indian Sikh man who then phoned police claiming the teenager had “racially attacked” him.

Henry lay drowning in his own blood, handcuffed and denied treatment by police who were only too ready to believe that the white person must have been the offender.

“I’ve been stabbed,” the teenager garbled to police as he lay handcuffed in the dirt, blood filling his lungs.

A police officer replied: “I don’t think you have mate.”

Three minutes passed before police finally paid enough attention to realise, too late to save his life, that Henry Nowak had indeed been stabbed.

The killer had already disposed of the murder weapon with the assistance of his mother, who removed it from the scene, and played the race card.

“I’ve been racially attacked by a white guy.” The killer said.

Police, long conditioned to believe that racism can only flow in one direction and that white people are inherently suspect were only too willing to believe the lie.

And now Henry Nowak is dead.

You would think the case would cause outrage.

Across the Atlantic, when George Floyd died in police custody, there were riots in the streets. Not just in American streets. There were protests and demonstrations across the Western world, entire city blocks burned.

Even UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer took a knee for George Floyd. Yet Starmer only commented on Henry Nowak’s murder after media outlets, Elon Musk and people like me began highlighting not just his silence but the legacy media and the Left.

The Prime Minister eventually released a statement expressing his condolences and concern. He said “…we must end the cycle of tragedy by tackling the horror of knife crime…”

Let’s conduct a thought experiment.

Imagine the roles were reversed.

Imagine Henry Nowak was an immigrant. Perhaps a young Pakistani man.

Imagine the outrage.

Imagine the headlines.

Imagine the speeches from political leaders.

Imagine how London would be burning right now.

The British Prime Minister would have addressed the nation and promised to do everything in his power to eradicate racism and bigotry.

But Henry Nowak was not black, he was not brown, he was white and white doesn’t count, or at least it doesn’t count as much.

I am not arguing that George Floyd received too much attention, that is a separate debate. My criticism is that Henry Nowak appears to have received too little.

If political leaders were willing to kneel for George Floyd why is there no comparable national reflection for a white teenager murdered in circumstances that raise serious questions about racial hostility?

In much of the Western world white men have become society’s acceptable target.

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs were originally sold as a means of ensuring equal opportunity.

But increasingly these initiatives strip men (especially white men) of their individuality and reduce them to representatives of a supposedly privileged class whose concerns can be safely ignored.

Institutions that boast about opposing discrimination now seem remarkably selective when deciding which forms of discrimination deserve attention.

And perhaps the greatest irony of all is that many of these Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs are championed by white women who increasingly view white men not as individuals, but as members of a privileged class whose concerns can be safely dismissed.

A black man is murdered? Outrage. It’s racism.

And even if the killer was black, someone, somewhere, will insist that systemic racism was the real culprit.

But if a white man is murdered? Meh. Move along. Nothing to see here.

That is why the Henry Nowak case resonates far beyond a single tragic murder.

For many people it represents a test of whether Western societies genuinely believe in equal treatment or merely equal treatment for some groups.

People are tired of being told that racism is a national emergency one day and an inconvenient topic the next.

If racism is wrong, then it is wrong regardless of who commits it and regardless of who suffers from it.

That principle should not change according to the identity of the victim.

All I want is equality. No matter the colour of your skin.

Is that asking too much?

Senator Ralph Babet, Senator for Victoria, United Australia Party.



Senator Babet is an Australian Federal Senator, a committed advocate for freedom, and an unapologetic voice for common-sense conservatism. He is a passionate defender of Australian sovereignty, traditional values, and the right to speak the truth – no matter how unpopular it may be in the mainstream media or political establishment.

Senator Babet created Let’s Talk About It as a platform to deliver unfiltered truth, bold ideas, and the real news they don’t want you to know – without censorship, spin, or corporate interference.

“In an age of manufactured consent and media manipulation, telling the truth is an act of rebellion. Let’s Talk About It exists to inform, empower, and rally Australians who still believe in freedom, faith, and our way of life.”
— Senator Babet

“ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!” – Katie Hopkins Drops a Truth Bomb About Immigration!

Posted on by

“ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!” – Katie Hopkins Drops a Truth Bomb About Immigration!

Katie Hopkins — media commentator, outspoken public figure, and one of the most controversial voices in modern Britain — has come out firmly backing Zia Yusuf’s blunt remark that “it’s totally unfair to expect British t@xpayers to fund a food bank for the world, to spend tens and ultimately hundreds of billions on welfare for foreign nationals, and then to call them racist when they raise concerns.”

In a fiery moment that immediately set social media alight, Katie Hopkins pulled no punches:

“How dare we ask our own people to foot the bi|| for a system that is crushing public services — and then shame them for daring to speak out?”

But she didn’t stop there.

Turning her fire toward Keir Starmer’s leadership, Katie Hopkins delivered a scathing rebuke:

“Compassion is an empty slogan if it ignores the real, daily struggles of British families and worse, if it dismisses their legitimate concerns as prejudice.”

Katie Hopkins — long known for positioning herself as a fierce defender of ordinary citizens, fairness, and moral clarity — made one thing crystal clear:

raising concerns is not hatred, and responsibility is not racism.

💬 “Stop punishing hardworking t@xpayers. Stop the virtue-signaling. And for heaven’s sake – listen to the people who actually keep this country standing!

Michael Murphy: Britain’s mass child rape horror and the price of not being called

Posted on by

Michael Murphy: Britain’s mass child rape horror and the price of not being called racist

Thanks to Elon Musk, the grooming gangs scandal is finally getting the outrage it deserves

Author of the article:

Michael Murphy , Special to National Post

Published Jan 09, 2025  • 

409 Comments

Keir Starmer
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer answers questions on January 06, 2025 in Epsom, England. (Photo by Leon Neal/Getty Images)

For years, the British establishment ignored the mass rape of thousands of English girls by predominantly Pakistani-Muslim mena crime it still refuses to confront. Embarrassment over the ethnic profile of both abusers and victims enabled networks of rapists, known as “grooming gangs,” to prey on vulnerable children with impunity. Driven partly by racial and religious contempt for their mostly white victims, these men exploited girls across northern and central England in an atrocity without parallel in modern British history. It continues to this day.

How did this happen? Or more precisely, how could it have been tolerated? Much like the Catholic Church abuse scandals, this crime threatened a cherished dogma. Multiculturalism preached that diversity was “our strength.” When uncomfortable truths surfaced, they were quietly brushed aside.

The illusion came at a cost. Whistleblowers were smeared as bigots, and victims dismissed by the very people meant to protect them. In case after case, town after town, police and local officials were more concerned with avoiding accusations of racism and preserving “community cohesion” than preventing the rape of children. And with few exceptions, journalists averted their eyes from one of the gravest injustices of our time.

That changed last week, when the grotesque details of one case, involving the mass rape of a 12-year-old girl, reached Elon Musk, who amplified it to his 200 million followers on X. This shattered what writer Ben Sixsmith called a decades-long “conspiracy of murmuring” and triggered an international outcry — one, at last, commensurate with the scale of the horror.

Instead of channelling the public outrage — the obvious response given the severity of the crimes — the British Prime Minister sparred with Musk over alleged “lies” and “misinformation.” In doing so, he missed the point entirely. Musk’s interventions, calling for members of the government to be jailed, were clumsy at times, but pale in comparison to the horror at hand. It is precisely this kind of deflection that allowed the abuse to persist, unchecked, for decades. While British politicians agonized over linguistic etiquette, a nationwide epidemic of child rape was ignored — and enabled — by those in power.

As a result, Britain is well-versed in the dangers of “far-Right” boogeymen and the speech crimes of anti-Islam activists like Tommy Robinson, yet no one knows precisely how many girls have been molested. There has never been a national inquiry focusing solely on grooming gangs. Local investigations offer only fragments — glimpses of a vast, grim collage of abuse, obscured by wilful indifference.

An inquiry into Telford (2022) found that more than 1,000 girls were abused, with cases dating back to the 1980s. In Rotherham, a South Yorkshire town now synonymous with gang rape, more than 1,400 girls were sexually exploited between 1997 and 2013. Yet Telford and Rotherham are only two of more than 50 towns and cities where such gangs are known to have operated. In 2023 alone, police in England and Wales recorded over 7,000 sexual grooming offences, indicating the abuse is widespread and ongoing.

S

Without a comprehensive inquiry, we can only guess at the total number of victims. Speaking in the House of Lords in 2018, Lord Pearson suggested, based on available data and the often repeated daily abuse inflicted on victims, that in total “millions of rapes of white and Sikh girls by Muslim men” may have occurred.

But even such potentially staggering figures remain an abstraction, incapable of fully capturing the horror. Consider the case of Samantha (in some reports, she is named Sophie), a 12-year-old girl abducted in 2006 by “two Asian men” in Oldham. They drove her around for hours, repeatedly assaulted her, then threw her from a moving car. Desperate and injured, she sought help from a passerby — who also abused her. She fled again, only to be picked up by another man she trusted to take her to the police. Instead, he took her to a house, where she was raped by five more “Asian men.” Her ordeal lasted nearly 24 hours. In total, eight men assaulted Samantha that day. In her world, every adult was a predator. The ringleader of the final gang, Shakil Chowdhury was jailed for only three years.

Such stories are not aberrations. One girl, enslaved at the age of 12, was branded with the initial “M” on her buttock by her rapist, Mohammed, to mark her as his property. Another 14-year-old was abducted, raped, and allegedly dismembered, with her body disposed of at a kebab shop.

The victims, mocked as “white slags,” were considered easy prey by their abusers. At a 2012 sentencing for Rochdale perpetrators, the judge noted that the girls were treated as “worthless and beyond respect” because “they were not of your community or religion.”

According to a study published by the Social Science Research Network (SSRN), the vast majority of those prosecuted for grooming gang crimes in the UK between 1997 and 2017 were of Pakistani-Muslim backgrounds — a fact frequently downplayed by the media.

In Rotherham, a 2020 academic study found that one in 73 Muslim men in the town had been prosecuted for involvement in grooming gangs. How many remain undetected because authorities are looking the other way in Rochdale, Telford, Oxford, and beyond? Without a national inquiry, we may never know.

In a speech that could define his premiership, Starmer dismissed calls for an inquiry as pandering to a “far-Right bandwagon” — a slur on the British public’s legitimate concerns, one he may come to regret.

Such declarations reflect a deeply ingrained mindset: unpalatable truths involving minority groups are considered too dangerous to share with the public. It is this attitude that allowed grooming gangs to thrive unchecked for so long. Authorities were petrified of a backlash against the “Asian community” from the white majority. In Manchester, a 2019 report concluded that Asian grooming gangs were left to roam the streets partly because officers were instructed to seek out offenders of other ethnicities.

Similarly, the 2022 Telford review found, “there was a nervousness about race … bordering on a reluctance to investigate crimes committed by what was described as the ‘Asian’ community.” The report found that the town council suspended taxi licensing enforcement, even though it had become “aware of taxi drivers offering children free rides in return for sexual activity.” The decision to stop enforcement, the report concluded, “was borne entirely out of fear of accusations of racism.”

To understand the power of a belief, consider what people are willing to sacrifice for it. In Britain, the sanctity of children, their innocence, and the integrity of our institutions were all heaped onto the pyre of a multicultural ideal — one that promised harmony but delivered a betrayal too vast and too painful to yet comprehend.

Michael Murphy is a journalist based in London. He writes for the Daily Telegraph and presented the documentary ‘Ireland is full! Anti-immigration backlash in Ireland’. You can follow him on X: @michaelmurph_y.