White Privilege? — One Fed Up White Woman
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Attachments area…
Blog Archives
The Truth About the “Refugee” Invasion of Europe
Illegals in Greece — the unarmed invasion of sovereign countries
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Published on Sept. 7, 2015
The migrant crisis is being exploited by governments to impose mass immigration on western countries whose voters have overwhelming rejected the failed policy of multiculturalism
Cutting through the “Refugee” Hysteria
During the past week the media has omitted mention of pertinent factors quite deliberately. Communist China showed off its military to remember the end of the Japanese war effort. The media left one to assume that these Chinese had defeated Japan. The USA defeated Japan and Chiang Kai-Shek’s Nationalist Army was the most successful opponent of the Japanese within China. The communists under Chairman Mao were scarcely more than a rabble. They had more impact on civilians than Japanese. Memory of these facts gained little attention.
So it is also with the recent migration issues in Europe. The contextual factors that matter in shaping pubic opinion have not been outlined by the media although they are well known. The reason for this deliberate silence, awaiting signs of the politically correct stance to take, informs the following notes.
- Who is a refugee and who is an economic migrant? The acquirement of privileges depends upon an answer to this question. Commonsense answers and not media and German usage should apply. A person becomes a refugee at the very first place at which he or she finds shelter and protection when fleeing from a situation that threatens this person’s life. Even if his sojourn is brief. Should this refugee seek to leave this shelter he abandons the status of a refugee. He moves from the status of a refugee to that of other migrants, perhaps an economic migrant (in the 17C there were religious emigrants from England). Once safety is first reached a refugee can make a decision that now he is safe there are other options available for future life. In this he is utterly no different from a migrant escaping a famine or simply trying to achieve a more rewarding existence. Thus Syrians who choose to leave Lebanon, Turkey or Jordan, where they have refuge, and travel to Europe by so doing acquire the status of economic migrants. The media and Germany choose to overlooks this critical semantic. They decide who is a refugee by identifying his place of origin. They ignore whether he started his journey to Europe from a place of safety outside his place or country of origin.
- Let us confront the reality that the Islamic faith of any migrant imposes a burden for any European country. France has notably failed to assimilate Muslims. Admitting more Muslim migrants will compound this difficulty. This is true in Britainand elsewhere. Eighty per cent of Muslims in the UK have attested in a poll that being a citizen of the UK is subordinate in importance to their religion. Disloyalty and security issues arise. Non Muslim migrants avoid this problem.
- The UK and the Netherlands like to see themselves as multicultural societies. With the present ethnic mixture comes considerable integration. Sadly this will become a passing reality in the UK that is now a host to 8 million people not born in the country. Globally, since the 1960s academics have recorded situations where people from different backgrounds move towards parity in numbers. The almost invariable consequence is tension, conflict, and broken heads. It is now happening in Ulster where the Catholics are outbreeding the Protestants. Thus in-migration just builds problems of civil cohesion. The invasion of Europe that is now occurring lowers civic unity and encourages the perseverance of extremist nationalist politics.
- Many in-migrants, perhaps most, from Syria have been involved on all sides of the civil war. Many have been combatants. They want to avoid documentation until they have disguised their identities. One day some will be prosecuted for war crimes in Syria because of poor documentation and identity checks due to the excitement over this issue generated by the encouragement of the immigration of undocumented Syrians to Germany.
- The politicians who talk about the past movement of people within Europe as a reason why the first wave of the new invasion should be accommodated have got it wrong. If we’ve done it once why cannot it be done again?
These politicians have overlooked the fact that these shifts in population involved people who derived from mainly Christian backgrounds and accepted the subordination of religion to the affairs of states. The migrants, in other words, were cousins. What of the Jews? They do not proselytize. They accommodate themselves to their hosts. Many rapidly drift away from Judaism. This is quite a contrast to the insular Muslim who tenaciously cling to their belief and ways of ordering their lives.
- There has been mention that the interwar exodus from German lands was an undocumented tide. The USA and Canada rarely admitted immigrants who at the point of entry did not possess valid documents. These must be issued by Embassies in Europe. The overwhelming number of the 600,00 inter-war in-migrants to the UK bore documents of entitlement to entry issued by British Embassies in Europe.
- Queen Angela Merkel 2 or 3 weekends ago declared that Germany at the time had 400,000 would be recent migrants. She declared that Syrians, even without documentation, would be preferred because they were refugees. Her spokesman let it be known that each Syrian would receive a monthly subsistence allowance of 365 Euros, free housing and medical attention. Now the number has risen to 800,000. It will require 10 bn euro a year to look after them. And think what this will do to unemployment figures. In such a way the invasion was encouraged and became a German Problem in August 2015. Now the Germans are frightened and seek to deflect responsibility. With the aid of France and Brussels they are desperate to declare this is now an European Problem.
- The Pope in Rome believes that man is born with a quiver full of rights. The victors of war in the 1940s shared this belief that has informed the heart of refugee policies ever since. But recorded history show that rights are man made and situational. Hence the different degrees, statuses and fortunes of men. A reality that has been pushed aside since the 1940s. This limited and provisional view of the rights of man is the only one that I relevant to this present Century. Authoritarian regimes are many. By reason of their nature they encourage dissidence. In turn this creates refugees. For every democratic regime there is a matching authoritarian government. Hence the numbers of potential dissidents and refugees might amount to 30 to 40 percent of global population. It is beyond the resources of the democratic regimes to provide havens for all these possible dissidents. Just think of the size of possible dissidence in modern China. The application of the 1940s beliefs and outlook about refugees cannot cope with the sheer scale of authoritarian regimes. The United Nations and the European Union should close their institutions devoted to 1940s refugee missions. They are not entitled to judge the varying responses to refugee pressures by democratic nations who interpret the world through the eyes of their elector citizens.
- Finally, let us remember 17C England. In the parishes the fear contained in this nursery rhyme summed up the migration debate.
“Hark Hark the dogs do bark
The beggars are coming to town
Some in rags and some in jags
And one in velvet gown”
(A jag was a slit in a gown.)
In 1601, an Act for the Relief of the Poor was succeeded in 1662 by an Act of Settlement. Our first national policy for the poor was contained in these Acts. Each parish became responsible for its own poor. A poor person had to have a “settlement” in a particular parish in order to be entitled to remain within its boundary. When a person was unemployed, after 40 days in a parish, he would be chucked out unless he could prove that he was born in the parish. Then these unemployed beggars would migrate to parishes where they might be treated more leniently. Beggars banded together and menaced parishes. Such parishes demanded better protection, improvement in the pooling of responsibility across parishes (how modern!). This is what the 1662 Act bestowed upon them. — P. Dilaveri
Soul Of A Nation: Multiculturalism And The Demise Of Christian Tradition
“What does it profit a man to gain the world and loose his soul”
While it is difficult to confirm the loss of one’s soul, it is somewhat easier to verify the loss of one’s nation— or rather, to verify the demise of a nation’s defining characteristics. Like all countries, Canada was built upon a foundation of political principles—for example, democratic process, civil rights, and our judicial system.
A commonality among these nation-building principles is that they are rooted in western political ideology—for example, our democratic process has its roots in Britain’s parliamentary system, and going much further back, in Greek and Roman political philosophy.
The same can be said for Canada’s religious traditions. From an historical perspective, Christianity has been our country’s primary religious institution, as well as the religious faith which has most influenced Canadian society.
In 1988, Multicultural policy was entrenched in the Canadian constitution. Since that time, it is reasonable to state that Christian tradition has been on a downward trajectory. To be even more forthright, it is arguable that official multiculturalism has been used as a tool for the marginalization of Christian religion in Canada. Indeed, the proponents of this development may not have “gained the world,” but they are well on their way to gaining the “soul of our nation.”
Take the curious topic of religion within our public school system. Recently, the Supreme Court of Canada passed a motion to ban the Lord’s Prayer— a cornerstone of Christianity— from our public schools. Presumably, this was not implemented for punitive reasons, but rather to create a scholastic environment devoid of any form of religious influence. In light of Canada’s adherence to the separation of “church and state,” this appears reasonable— yet what is not reasonable is that at present, dozens of Canadian schools are accommodating the wishes of Muslim parents by offering Islamic religious services on school premises.
What conclusion can we draw from this? One thought is that the situation reveals an incredible double-standard—one which is rationalized by way of Canada’s official policy of multiculturalism.
Nothing exemplifies Canada’s religious celebrations more than the holiday of Christmas. Here again, we find an example of an impediment toward the Christian faith. In politically correct fashion, Canadians have been instructed that wishing someone a “Merry Christmas” is no longer in fashion— “Happy Holidays” only, please.
These developments are all the more questionable when considering that Canada is presently experiencing exponential growth in the area of “non-traditional” religion. The Islamic festival of Ramadan is making headway throughout our society, so much so that our Prime Minister recently held Ramadan celebrations at 24 Sussex Drive in Ottawa. New mosques, some of which receive government funding, are appearing at a rapid pace throughout our urban centres, as well as in smaller rural communities.
Presently, Canada’s Muslim community comprises 3.2% of our overall population. Canadians of Christian heritage comprise approximately 82% of our population. One does not have to be Stephen Hawking to recognize that something is not adding up here—namely, that the religious affiliation of the majority of Canadians is becoming marginalized, while the religious rights of a small fragment of Canadian society are being upheld as a symbol of multicultural righteousness. Interestingly, it is not Muslim community leaders who are necessarily the most influential parties in these developments.
Rather, it is a loose affiliation of organizations— non-profit multicultural groups, “identity” politicians, as well as university professors and civil rights lawyers, who are leading the charge. Collectively known as “Multicult Canada”— these forces are every bit as influential as the Muslim communities themselves. In fact, their influence is so profound they are transforming our society in a manner unprecedented in the history of our nation.
Armed with the Multicultural Act of Canada(1988), as well as the Pierre Trudeau-penned Charter of Rights and Freedoms(1982), “Multicult” Canada are influencing— perhaps one should say eroding— traditional Canadian identity right before our eyes. To make matters worse, Canadians thus far have been unaware of what is actually occurring.
As usual, it is money—or funding— which is playing a vital role. Multicultural policy mandates that our tax payer dollars be given to so-called “minority” communities for the promotion of their culture, language and holidays. This funding, estimated to be over a billion dollars within the past two decades, enables these communities to fund their religious institutions— Islamic mosques, Sikh temples, as well as related religious holidays and events.
An interesting example is the $50 million dollar mosque currently being built in Fort MacMurray, Alberta. Just how many of our tax payer dollars are being provided for grooming the mosque’s expansive lawns and gardens, we do not know. What we do know is that according to the mosque’s own public messaging, the project is also being funded by the Kuwaiti government.
Let’s get this straight. If Canadian tax payer dollars are being provided for the project, this means that Canadians, together with the government of Kuwait, are funding the Fort MacMurray mosque. Naturally, Fort MacMurray City Council deny that tax payer dollars are involved. In this particular instance, maybe yes, and maybe no, however this does not circumvent the fact that Canadian tax payers are footing the bill for many projects of this nature.
Up to this point, the funding has been justified by the idea that Canada’s “minority communities” deserve this money to gain a measure of equality with Canada’s dominant community- the white community. Frankly, this is one of the biggest fallacies in the history of ethnic relations in Canada.
If a Moslem community in a northern Canadian town can afford to build a $50 million dollar mosque, complete with lavish landscaping funded by oil-rich Kuwait, why on earth are Canadians providing additional funding through our tax dollars? Furthermore, when taking into account Canada’s history of immigration over the past four decades, these so-called “minorities” are no longer minorities at all. Yet, they continue to receive millions our tax dollars for their cultural and religious promotions.
Meanwhile, a condemnation of Christian religious symbols continues— for example, the removal of crosses from a number of our government institutions. Fair? Equitable? Not on your life. Our courts, legal industry, civil libertarians and other Charter of Rights activists continue to call for the impediment of Christian traditions within our society, while at the same time fighting for the rights of religious fundamentalists who want to hide their identity during their citizenship oath.
Indeed, this is where multiculturalism has brought our society since its inception a mere twenty-six years ago. These hypocrisies and double-standards— justified by way of a multicultural policy never endorsed or approved of by the Canadian public—are contributing to the erosion our national identity, culture, and religious traditions. Clearly, the time has come to level the playing field, and repeal the Multicultural Act of Canada. — Brad Salzberg, June 2015
Vancouver Voters Turn Down Tax Grab to Pay for Feds Immigration Follies
Without a halt to immigration, there can be little Improvement in traffic gridlock. Results announced July 2 showed that voters in the Lower Mainland of British Columbia said a resounding “No” to a proposed .5% sales tax increase to pay for a planned $7.5-billion improvement of the region’s wretched transportation infrastructure. It would have “included a major east-west subway line across Vancouver, a light rail network for Surrey extending to Langley, a replacement bridge across the Fraser River, 11 new rapid bus lines in the suburbs, and a third harbour ferry.” (Globe and Mail, July 2, 2015) The 700,000 voters who sent in their ballots voted 62% against this planned cash grab.
Almost unmentioned in the debate was the key cause of the worsening traffic gridlock — mass immigration. Forty years of failure to improve transportation infrastructure and 25 years of mass immigration have crowded Vancouver and Toronto to the bursting point. There is no point spending more local money in a futile attempt to catch up if the federal government insists on importing masses of immigrants, mostly from the Third World, in these times of high unemployment.
If the Federal Government wants to import 265,000 plus immigrants a year, they must bear the cost — in the tens of billions of dollars — to improve the infrastructure stressed by the decisions they’ve imposed.
Canada First Immigration Reform Committee
Box 332,
Rexdale, Ontario, M9W 5L3
Ph: 905-566-4455; FAX: 905-566-4820
Website: http://canadafirst.nfshost.com
Paul Fromm, B.Ed, M.A. Director
July 5, 2015
The Editor,
The National Post,
365 Bloor St. East, 3rd Floor
Toronto, Ontario
M4W 3L4
By FAX: Fax: 416-383-2305
Re: Editorial “The People have a right to say no”
Dear Sir:
Re: “The People have a right to say no” (National Post, July 4 , 2015), the strong no voice – 62 per cent – of people in the Lower Mainland of B.C. to a sales tax increase proposal to fund transit improvement was the right choice. A tax increase would have helped fund successive government’s failed immigration policies.
Almost absent from the debate was any discussion of the major cause of chronic gridlock in Vancouver and the GTA – massive immigration enabled by the federal government. Immigration is surrounded with feel good slogans – “diversity” “growing the economy.” Seldom addressed are the costs – among them strain on infrastructure.
Yes, municipal and provincial governments have failed to maintain the infrastructure to accommodate the huge flood of immigrants. However, if the feds insist on massive immigration 265,000 yearly in times of high unemployment, most of it heading for Vancouver or Toronto, they should pay the costs of upgrading the infrastructure to accommodate these people.
Vancouverites rightly rejected being further taxed to help correct the gridlock mess the feds have caused. Even had all the improvements planned over the next decade come to pass, gridlock would remain as all parties seem addicted to massive immigration. Any gains would soon be erased by the constant immigrant flood.
Paul Fromm
Director
CANADA FIRST IMMIGRATION REFORM COMMITTEE
Is Saskatchewan Liquor Board Ignoring Unemployed Canadians and Trying to Recruit Immigrants?
The Open Door Society is a government funded immigrant services organization. The job fair is in their building and NOT generally advertised to the job seeking public. We don’t think it right that SLGA is having a job fair that is essentially targeted Only to immigrants.There will be few Canadian job seekers there because nobody knows about it!
These liquor store jobs are much sought after bec
ause they are unionized government jobs with quite decent pay at least $15 an hour or more, and it’s not right to only offer them to foreigners, when lots of Canadians actually want these jobs! The especially valuable part of this job fair to job seekers as you know is the ON SITE interviews, which are a rarity and not usually available to the regular applicant in the normal process. There was a big controversy a few years back when this same SLGA hired at least one Temporary Foreign Worker for a job where there was no shortage of local people. Exclusion of Canadians is outrageous and a betrayal!
Immigrant underclass in GTA fuels simmering frustrations:
“By 2017, the GTA is forecast to become home to a predominantly non-European population.”
Brad: Canadians of European Origin are headed for minority status in Toronto and this Multicult Practitioner is playing the immigrant guilt card.
Warning…you are about the read a lie:
“While immigrants and immigration is the heart and soul of the country, if you look at the main basis of inequality in Canada, along with gender, it’s based on race and immigrant status,” said Yogendra Shakya, senior research scientist at Access Alliance.
Brad: The heart and soul of this country?? Perhaps according to the prime movers in Multicult Canada’s attempt to destroy Canadian culture, but for the majority of Canadians– ie Canadians of European Origin(CEO)– this is yet another attempt to elevate immigrant groups by playing the sympathy card.
The heart and soul of this country was built by Canadians of European Origin:
– Governance
– Parliamentary system
– Legal and Judiciary system
– Capitalist Free Enterprise system
– Democratic Process
– Legislative system
– Educational system
– Taxation
– Social Services
and every other foundation of Canadian society.
NONE of these fundamentals are rooted in the nation’s from which our modern immigrants come from:
– China, India, Iran, Philippines, Pakistan Korea et al.
For how much longer are the Canadian public going to tolerate the Multicultural propaganda perpetrated by people like Y. Shakya?
OFFICIAL MULTICULTURAL POLICY: a mandate for Canadian taxpayers to fund the destruction of their own culture
Brad Salzberg
Canada takes a step back on immigration policy:
“We found that, especially on the issues of family reunification and access to citizenship, Canada is moving backwards.”
Brad: And well we should be. Family Reunification policy has been the most economically damaging of all methods of immigration to Canada- so much so that a 2011 study entitled “Canada and the Welfare State”(Grady & Grubel) shows that the net fiscal loss from this program is in the billions. Without a doubt, it is an economic loser.
However, this is just one component of Family Reunification’s negative societal impact. The policy’s lax requirements verge on the absurd: parents, grandparents, the elderly in general, non- english/french speaking, non-employable immigrants have come to our country under this plan by the millions.
These facts make Multicult Canada champion Ratna Omidvar’s opinions on the program so very questionable. Ignoring all economic ramafications, Omidvar continues to push a personal agenda of wanting to bring as many foreigners into Canada as possible. Not only this, she wants to remove white Canadians from their jobs and replace them with these new arrivals, many of whom are deficient in qualifications and our official languages.
“Becoming a Canadian is harder now than it was just a few years ago.”
Brad: It darn well should be. The system has been exploited for decades, particularly by so-called “economic migrants.” Show us an immgration program to Canada, and we will show you a program which has been exploited by shady characters, immigration “consultants”, lawyers, criminals, and the like.
“For the first time, Ottawa is now able to revoke Canadian citizenship from dual citizens if they are deemed to have committed certain crimes against the state.”
Brad: Multicult Canada, a loose affiliation of individuals and organizations intent on eroding traditional Canadian culture, identity and language, as well as their civil liberties backers, continue to show their incredible lack of concern for general Canadian well-being by opposing sound and rational laws intended to eliminate the entry of criminals into our country.
“Although Canada has traditionally scored highly on family reunification, its scores are declining there too. Of particular concern, the score measuring eligibility for sponsoring family members dropped from 79 in 2010 to 64 in 2015. It is now more difficult for immigrants to sponsor their loved ones. “
Brad: Let’s do the prudent thing and drop the “bleeding heart’ component of the situation for a moment. The issue of importing “loves ones” is all but meaningless in comparison to the needs of the Canadian people: a strong economy, personal safety, home affordability, environmental protection, urban traffic congestion, protection of criminals and immigration exploitation, and on and on…
“Ottawa has made numerous recent changes to family reunification policies. These measures include raising the sponsorship commitment from 10 to 20 years, increasing the income requirement for sponsoring parents and grandparents by 30 per cent, and instituting a longer period during which a sponsor must meet this requirement.”
Brad: Very wise of them, although this has arrived well after the damage has been done. In truth, it was an immigrant vote-grabbing Liberal government which implemented the insanity back in the 1980’s, in a desperate attempt to elevate a party which had tanked in popularity. Today, the Liberal Party has become little more than a vehicle for immigrant and multiculturalists, and has reached the point of not giving a damn about the rights and wants of Canadian-born citizens.
“Ottawa has failed in our eyes to provide a convincing justification for these changes.”
Brad: Yes, in YOUR EYES, however your eyes are tainted by a multicult bias which is not necessarily shared by the majority of Canadians. Of course, we don’t know this for certain, because immigration, multiculturalism have never been subject to the democratic process: no vote, no referendum, no public opinion on whether Canadians share the Multicult’s desire to transform Canadian society from its traditional English & French European culture to….what would we call it…a globalist/ communist/ foreign-dominated mess of a nation, devoid of sovereignty, democracy, and true freedom of expression.
“The new data signals a shift and encourages us to reflect on the most alarming trends and redirect where necessary.”
Brad: The most alarming trend in the HISTORY OF OUR COUNTRY is the undermining of our society by the likes of Multicult assassins such as Ryerson’s Ratna Omidvar, queen of the Canadian Multicult.
|
