Blog Archives
China to Wage War on America from the Arctic
Translations of this item:
- This month, Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post reported that the Shanghai-based Polar Research Institute of China revealed that “China has completed the field testing and evaluation of an underwater listening device that will be deployed on a large scale in the Arctic Ocean.”
- The innocuous-sounding report tells us that China intends to wage war against the United States and Canada from the Arctic.
- Other than this buoy, the institute said, China had “never planted a listening device there.”
- That assertion is not truthful. Last fall, the Canadian military, according to Canada’s Globe and Mail in February, removed buoys placed by China in Canadian waters in the Arctic.
- “China is now covertly preparing the groundwork for militarization of the largely undefended northern territory and critical Arctic sea routes.” — Charles Burton of the Ottawa-based Macdonald-Laurier Institute, to Gatestone, July 2023.
- All of this data is needed to listen for submarines, specifically American ones. China wants to track and destroy American subs from the top of the world before they can flood into Asian waters.
- The U.S.’s generous “engagement” approach to China has resulted in China obtaining observer status in the Arctic Council although no Chinese territory is in or near the Arctic.
- China already has two permanent research stations in the Arctic, one in Norway and the other in Iceland. That is two too many.
- [F]or China the Arctic is primarily a military domain. In addition to the buoys they are leaving in the Arctic, the Chinese are surveilling the area by air. The spy balloon that flew over the lower 48 states this year initially crossed into Alaska and Western Canada.
- China is not only pressing the United States and Canada from the north. In the other direction, China is establishing military bases in South America and the Caribbean and is infiltrating saboteurs across the border with Mexico. The Biden administration is allowing a hostile state to go hard against America from all sides. A menacing China is now everywhere in the Western Hemisphere.
This month, Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post reported that the Shanghai-based Polar Research Institute of China revealed that “China has completed the field testing and evaluation of an underwater listening device that will be deployed on a large scale in the Arctic Ocean.”
The innocuous-sounding report tells us that China intends to wage war against the United States and Canada from the Arctic.
China had installed the “polar subglacial shallow surface acoustic monitoring buoy system” on floating ice in the Arctic on August 9, 2021. Information obtained by the device was uplinked to Chinese satellites.
The research institute, a Chinese central government agency that “plans and coordinates China’s polar activities,” stated that the devices could be used for “subglacial communication, navigation and positioning, target detection, and the reconstruction of marine environmental parameters.” This buoy “can be massively used in the construction of the Arctic Ocean environmental monitoring network.”
Other than this buoy, the institute said, China had “never planted a listening device there.”
That assertion is not truthful. Last fall, the Canadian military, according to Canada’s Globe and Mail in February, removed buoys placed by China in Canadian waters in the Arctic.
Not much is known about the removed Chinese devices. Pierre LeBlanc, a former commander of the Canadian armed forces in the Arctic, told Voice of America that Canada has not revealed the location of the removed buoys or their type, but it is nonetheless apparent the Chinese military placed them in or near Canada’s Northwest Passage without permission.
“China’s intent to dominate the Arctic region of North America is of increasing priority for the Xi Jinping regime,” Charles Burton of the Ottawa-based Macdonald-Laurier Institute told Gatestone. “Moving forward from the illogical assertion that China is a ‘near-Arctic nation’ and Xi’s touting of the ‘Polar Silk Road,’ China is now covertly preparing the groundwork for militarization of the largely undefended northern territory and critical Arctic sea routes.”
Retired Lieutenant-General Michael Day told the Globe and Mail that China’s buoys would likely have been mapping environmental conditions such as seabeds and ice thickness. Buoys can also monitor ice movement, ocean currents, water temperature, and salinity.
All of this data is needed to listen for submarines, specifically American ones. China wants to track and destroy American subs from the top of the world before they can flood into Asian waters.
The frozen Arctic is a hot topic these days, and China is trying to control it. The Polar Research Institute of China attempted to buy an airport in Lapland, Finland, but under U.S. pressure the government there blocked the purchase.
In addition, a Chinese state mining company attempted to buy land close to a facility maintained by the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), the joint Canada-U.S. military command that provides early warning. That purchase was also stopped.
“Since the advent of the Cold War, the Arctic has been the domain of two nuclear powers, the United States of America and the Soviet Union, now the Russian Federation,” said James Fanell of the Geneva Centre for Security Policy to this publication. “These two states demonstrated an understanding of the balance of power and observed an uneasy truce within the waters of the Arctic. Since 2017, the People’s Republic of China, led by Xi Jinping, has made it clear it covets access to the Arctic and recognition of its major-power status there.”
China has, Fanell points out, announced three Blue Economic Corridors, one of which includes the Arctic. These corridors are part of Xi’s worldwide Belt and Road Initiative.
Unlike Moscow and Washington, Beijing, with its forays into the Arctic, is upending stability. As Fanell, also a former U.S. Navy captain who served as Director of Intelligence and Information Operations at the U.S. Pacific Fleet, points out, “Beijing arrogantly believes they deserve a place in the Arctic Council to ‘call the shots’ and expand Chinese influence and access to this vital region atop the planet.”
The U.S.’s generous “engagement” approach to China has resulted in China obtaining observer status in the Arctic Council although no Chinese territory is in or near the Arctic.
There are eight states with territory inside the Arctic Circle. With the exceptions of Russia and Sweden, all are NATO members. This year, Sweden should join that alliance.
Moreover, the five Arctic littoral states—the Arctic Five of Canada, Denmark, Norway, Russia, and the United States—are all NATO members other than Russia. This gives America the ability to determine outcomes in the Arctic, especially if Washington were to oppose China’s initiatives, as it of course should.
China already has two permanent research stations in the Arctic, one in Norway and the other in Iceland. That is two too many.
The Chinese know the value of the Arctic. Warming temperatures are melting Arctic ice, making drilling and mining in the region more feasible. Moreover, melting ice opens up shorter routes for container ships and other vessels.
Yet for China, the Arctic is primarily a military domain. In addition to the buoys they are leaving in the Arctic, the Chinese are surveilling the area by air. The spy balloon that flew over the lower 48 states this year initially crossed into Alaska and Western Canada.
China is not only pressing the United States and Canada from the north. In the other direction, China is establishing military bases in South America and the Caribbean and is infiltrating saboteurs across the border with Mexico. The Biden administration is allowing a hostile state to go hard against America from all sides. A menacing China is now everywhere in the Western Hemisphere.
Gordon G. Chang is the author of The Coming Collapse of China, a Gatestone Institute distinguished senior fellow, and a member of its Advisory Board.
Europeans Must Recover Pride in Themselves & Tell Their Own History
Inaccurate population data could negatively affect policy: expert
Non-permanent residents missed, CIBC report says
- National Post
- 1 Sep 2023
- Naimul Karim Financial Post nkarim@postmedia.com
There are about a million more non-permanent residents in Canada than the official number that is widely quoted and used for planning purposes by various authorities, according to a recent report by CIBC World Markets Inc.
If ignored, the “undercounting” could hurt Canada’s housing and labour policies, said economist Benjamin Tal, who wrote the Aug. 30 report, Counting heads in Canada — a conundrum. Statistics Canada keeps track of population counts in two ways. The first is the census, last published in 2021, which indicated there were about 925,000 non-permanent residents in Canada. It also provides quarterly and annual estimates of population growth. This estimate, Tal said, suggests the population of non-permanent residents in 2021 was about 1.17 million, or 250,000 more than what the census stated.
Statistics Canada said these estimates are based on post-census coverage studies of a representative sample of individuals to determine how many individuals were missed or counted more than once.
In addition, the CIBC report said that between 2017 and 2022, there were at least 750,000 non-permanent residents, which represent foreign workers, international students, holders of Minister’s Permits and refugees, who overstayed in Canada. Tal said Statistics
Canada has yet to reflect these numbers.
Statistics Canada’s current system assumes that temporary resident visa holders have left the country 30 days after the expiry of their visa. The agency refers to this as an interruption period. However, Tal said there is a huge group of people who continue to stay in the country while applying for work visas, extension of resident visas and permanent visas.
While these residents are accounted for once their permit to stay is renewed, they are not counted — after the 30-day period — until their application is approved by government.
As such, to come up with the 750,000 number, Tal looked at the gap between the applications submitted to Canada and the number of approvals between 2017 and 2022. His report doesn’t indicate how many left the country during this period.
In total, he said Canada has undercounted the number of temporary residents by at least a million, and that since the country’s housing agency follows the census for its policies, the undercounting could worsen the existing housing crisis.
“Demand is stronger than what official numbers are telling you and that’s why we are approaching zero vacancy rate in rental apartments,” Tal said. “We don’t have enough of them.”
He added that the undercounting could also have “major implications” on any government plan to put a cap on the number of international students.
Housing minister Sean Fraser on Aug. 22 said the government would need to do some “serious thinking” when it comes to the international student program, which has had immense growth in concentrated
areas, as part of the government’s plans to ease existing housing pressures.
Statistics Canada defended its numbers. Spokesperson Melissa Gammage said the agency wasn’t aware of the data sources or the methodology used by CIBC to come up with the 750,000 figure. “It’s true that the level of coverage of NPRS (non-permanent residents) in censuses can be more challenging than that of other groups,” she said in a statement. “However, after each census, Statcan conducts rigorous coverage studies to estimate the level of coverage of the census. The results are added to demographic estimates so that they consider NPRS missed by the census. This is the usual process of producing demographic estimates.”
Gammage also said that from Sept. 27 onward, the agency will publish new data tables on non-permanent residents that will include interruption period rules, more details on NPRS, such as their estimated numbers and permit types, as well as other “improvements.” The new approach was previously planned and not in response to the CIBC report.
Tal welcomed the changes. “We are blessed with one of the best statistical agencies in the world. We are heavy users of Stats Canada’s data,” he said. “The note was not aimed to criticize, but rather to point to some issues that need to be looked at.”
Bank of Nova Scotia analyst Rebekah Young said there should be an urgency in addressing data challenges with respect to population estimates, but added that it would be a “stretch” to put too much blame on an undercount for today’s strained infrastructure.
Massachusetts calls up national guard to cope with migrants as protests rage
By Ronny Reyes Published Sep. 3, 2023 Updated Sep. 3, 2023, 10:25 p.m. ET
More On: migrants
Massachusetts officials overwhelmed by arriving migrants have activated the national guard as they scramble for more housing, while aid groups say they have been pushed to the limit and protests abound.
Gov. Maura Healey mobilized 250 members of the Massachusetts National Guard on Thursday to help transport the latest wave of asylum seekers to shelters across the state.
But much like the crisis overtaking the Big Apple, Massachusetts has nowhere near enough housing or resources currently available to accommodate the influx.
“Right now, the non-profits that are in Massachusetts are stretched and so thin they cannot provide anymore staff,” state Sen. Jamie Eldridge told CBS News.
While the National Guard can help with the lack of manpower, the state can do little to address the shortage of housing outside of creating new shelters, which local residents vehemently oppose.
Dozens of protesters came out Saturday to the Yarmouth Resort motel, where the state hopes to set aside 100 units for migrant families, many of whom include Haitian immigrants displaced by natural disasters.
The protesters claimed that the state has prioritized the need of the migrants over the need of its own homeless residents, including veterans, with many at the rally flashing signs that read, “Vets and Cape Homeless First!!”
The hotel in Yarmouth is just one of more than 1,500 temporary hotels and new shelters set up across the state since 2022.
The state’s Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities said in a statement, “The administration is exploring all options to expand family shelter capacity to meet rising demand.”
All together, there are about 6,000 families, or more than 20,000 people, currently residing in state shelters, officials estimate.
The situation in Massachusetts is mirroring the year-long struggle in New York City to house the tens of thousands of migrants that have arrived there.
Last week, at least 400 people gathered in Staten Island to protest the transformation of a shuttered Catholic school into a 300-bed makeshift shelter.
What do you think? Post a comment.
Over the past year, more than 104,000 migrants from the US border have been shipped to the five boroughs, and nearly 56,000 are now being housed by the city.
The unprecedented influx spilled out onto the streets of Manhattan last month as scores of migrants were forced to sleep outside the Roosevelt Hotel in Midtown, which was set up as a processing center.
Jamie Sarkonak: House arrest for impregnating daughter a result of race-based sentencing
Nova Scotia’s lenient court system hurts the very communities it tries to protect
Article content
In the summer of 2019, a baby was born in Nova Scotia with “serious medical complications and significant developmental delays.” Concerns by a medical geneticist led to police becoming involved. When the mother, 23, was discovered sexting her father during a visit to the neonatal intensive care unit, it all made sense.
The parents were a father-daughter pair with a 31-year age gap between them. Both were intellectually disabled. Their child, also disabled, has since been placed in foster care.
Article content
Article content
The father was subsequently charged with the crime of incest. Shortly afterward, he confessed that he first slept with his daughter when she was 19 or 20.
Normally, incest would be punished with a jail sentence: two years on the low end, and 14 years maximum. Applying progressive sentencing principles, a majority of the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal decided late August that the father should only have to serve two years of house arrest (more reasonably, the dissenting judge believed that four years in jail was apt).
Incest is considered a serious crime for a number of reasons. Like murder, it’s sanctioned because it comes from a deep cultural taboo — in the west and pretty much everywhere else, too. The taboo likely emerged from the objective harm incest poses to society: incest causes genetic defects, and is often a result of one person’s exploitation of another. Offspring, regardless of age, cannot consent to sex with their parents.
At trial, the Crown had argued that the father should spend four to six years in jail, based on sentences that had been handed out in similar situations. It lost. On appeal, it argued the same. This was a severe crime, and it was made worse because the father violated his position of trust over his disabled daughter. Worse, he impregnated her, risking genetic harm to the child. (The Nova Scotia Public Prosecution Service told me Wednesday that it has not yet decided whether it’ll appeal once more to the Supreme Court of Canada.)
Article content
The trial court, and a majority of the appeal court, didn’t buy the Crown’s argument. Why? Because the offender was remorseful and was determined unlikely to re-offend.
Another reason was that he is Black.
While the Crown established, using past cases, that a jail sentence of four to six years was normal for this kind of crime, the appeal court dismissed this as merely a guideline. The court also noted that the offenders, in previous cases, were not African Nova Scotians. When deciding whether offenders of such heritage should serve house arrest or jail, the court wrote that “a more nuanced approach” was required. In short, a racial discount was to be applied.
“The moral culpability of an African Nova Scotian offender has to be assessed in the context of historic factors and systemic racism, as was done in this case,” wrote the trial judge, with whom the majority of the appeal court agreed. “Sentencing judges should take into account the impact that social and economic deprivation, historical disadvantage, diminished and non-existent opportunities and restricted options may have had on the offender’s moral responsibility.”
Article content
Related Stories
- Jamie Sarkonak: The Ontario homicide case that has ended racial fairness in court
- Matt Gurney: Inuit politician right to call for end to ‘dangerous’ special sentencing for aboriginals
As an African Nova Scotian, the father had been impacted by “historical deprivation, social and economic deprivation as well as diminished and virtually non-existent opportunities.” In sentencing, these broad factors didn’t have to be linked to his crime to be relevant — they just needed to be present.
The father’s upbringing was lined with abuse and parental dysfunction. His parents were alcoholics and his father was absent; the family was poor and moved around a lot; his schooling only went as far as Grade 4; he was sexually abused by at least three different people. His story is a harrowing one, and one that would be taken into consideration in sentencing no matter what his background. However, his tragic history carried particular significance due to his race.
All considered, the trial court and the majority of the appeal court agreed that the father’s circumstances (his “systemic and background experiences as an African Nova Scotian”) supported a sentence of two years under house arrest.
Article content
If this act of incest was committed several years ago, house arrest wouldn’t have even been on the table. The Criminal Code once prohibited house arrest as a punishment for incest (and various other crimes) — a prohibition that was upheld by the Supreme Court of Canada as late as 2022.
But, two weeks after that prohibition was upheld in the top court, the Liberal government passed a set of criminal law reforms (Bill C-5) to put house arrest back as an option for incest. One policy reason for this change, quoted in the court decision, was to address overrepresentation of Black Canadians in the prison system.
Aside from these sentencing reforms to the Criminal Code, the practice of assessing an individual Black offender’s experiences of racism and trauma has been supported directly by the feds. Pioneered by Nova Scotia and Ontario, the feds earmarked $6.6 million in 2021 to expand the practice.
The uptake of race-based criminal procedure in Canada has been a concerning trend, and this is only the latest example. Race-based sentencing discounts began being used for Indigenous people in 1999 after a decision called R v. Gladue; this practice was expanded for Black offenders in Nova Scotia in 2019 and in Ontario in 2021. The Supreme Court of Canada has also said that Charter rights are also to be interpreted with a racial lens. In Ontario last year, the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled that the race of an accused person should be factored into the decision to allow a jury to know their criminal record.
Article content
It’s hard to say how much the father’s community appreciates the court’s leniency, but what is clear from the court record is that he is not welcome. His crime put a rift between him and his seven other children, some of whom have barred him from seeing his grandchildren. His eighth child will be raised in foster care. He has been denounced within the broader African Nova Scotian community, and has consequently experienced social isolation.
The dissenting appeal judge, who also applied racial sentencing considerations but concluded that the father should serve jail time, pointed out that the crime had “a negative impact on the African Nova Scotian community.” There’s no doubt of that; incest harms the people at the heart of a small community the most. The theory behind lenient race-based sentencing is that it benefits a community, but in practice it deprives them of justice — while undermining the fairness of the system for everyone.
Self-Preservation of the European Founding/Settler People of North America is an Imperative, Not A Crime
| Let’s Call It Treason Ray DiLorenzo |
 |
| “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”Edmund Burke, 1729-1797 If you do nothing in a difficult time, your strength is limited. Proverbs 24 Millions of people around the world are beginning to figure out that there is a force—an evil cabal—trying to take over the entire planet. This force has influenced leaders of every persuasion in every country and has been remarkably successful in putting a vast number of governmental, religious, educational, medical, corporate, and institutional leaders in a sort of trance… zombie-like, to do their will. This force has faces…Bill Gates, George Soros, Klaus Schwab, Biden, Obama, Clinton, and hundreds of others—all doing the work of the World Economic Forum. Archbishop Vigano has been stalwart in his opposition to what is called the New World Order or Great Reset and probably knows of it better than most, for it has invaded even his Church. He calls it as it is: “a dystopian society, without past and without future, without faith and without ideals, without culture and without art, without fathers and mothers, without family and spirituality, without teachers and spiritual guides, without either respect for the elderly or hopes for our children. The recent pandemic farce—conducted with criminal methods that I have not hesitated to denounce since the beginning of 2020—has been followed by new emergencies—including the Ukrainian crisis—deliberately provoked with the aim of destroying the social and economic fabric of nations, decimating the world population, and concentrating control in the hands of an oligarchy that no one has elected and that has perpetrated a real-world coup d’état, for which sooner or later it will be called to answer before the world. …the electoral fraud of 2020 in the United States of America was also indispensable to prevent the confirmation of President Donald Trump, just as in 2013 the deep state and the deep church managed to get Pope Benedict XVI to resign and to elect a person pleasing to the New World Order.” National leaders are going out of their way to destroy their collective countries. These chief executives and oligarchs, feeling a New World Order is inevitable, are merely vying for a high position in what they think will be a new society. It is not more evident than here in the United States. These leaders make decisions that no one understands…destroying the election system of the greatest democracy in the world, ignoring the needs of their citizenry, and destroying the military and police departments with no regard for national security, citizen safety, or law and order. Gone are energy independence, dozens of food processing plants (it’s become a global phenomenon), and hundreds of farms (meat and dairy are bad, but bugs are good). Millions of illegal migrants pour into our countries without vetting, background or medical checks. Victims of disasters are fending for themselves. They distribute vaccines that are ineffective and have killed as many people as the disease. They print trillions, affecting nothing while creating massive inflation. Whole cities have become lawless, forcing businesses and families to pack up and leave. Stores that remain are locking up items like toothpaste while the middle class tries to cope. Billions are spent on migrants, while veterans are homeless. And then along comes COVID 2.0 with more vaccines on the way. Biden kicks back as America crumbles—our very own Nero, who fiddles while America burns. Do we simply watch as they harass, assault, imprison, and kill innocents for insurrection while we observe theirs? The Left seems unaffected by it all. Are they that secure about the 2024 election results? Is the fix already in? Is it treason to deny the people the right to freely choose the government they want? Is it treason to make the 1st Amendment ambiguous? And when people question an election, is it treason to imprison them without trial? Could such extreme paranoia indicate guilt? Do we call it treason when a president flagrantly ignores Supreme Court decisions? Is it treason to destroy all checks and balances within our federal government and establish a one-party system? Is it treason to allow and possibly cause the destruction of whole towns, killing hundreds of men, women, and children? Is it treason to cause false flags to hide ominous covert activity? Obama’s presidency was rife with crime and corruption. Is it reasonable to assume that Obama knew nothing of Biden’s and Clinton’s marketplace of political influence? Is it treason to purposely destroy what you have been entrusted with protecting? What is so bizarre is their denial of what is right in front of us. A good example is the Lahaina fire. Why did the police block the exits so people could not find safety? Why was there no water or a warning of any kind? Why have they placed a black curtain wall around the town so even the press can’t see what is going on? The Maui mayor’s press conference was pathetic. He spent more time throwing up his hands and raising his shoulders than answering questions from the press. You could feel the tension in the room. Mayorkas watches while the border is like a subway at rush hour, and he insists everything is secure. And the silence from the opposition about everything that is going on has been deafening. It’s a sort of fictional political novel, a tragedy, where an entire political party decides to dismantle a great nation, but the people wait for an answer from the opposition that never comes. Their default is to sit back and test the wind or just freeze in disbelief, proving their dysfunction. So, the ‘opposition’ sits back and assures us that another election is coming, not comprehending the damage to the country and not having the foresight or the intelligence to understand that the next election will be a repeat of the last, if it even occurs. The RINOS sit even further in their seats, waiting for a political opportunity. They are worse than traitors. There is some good news we need to cheer about that you will not get in the mainstream press. A collection of 1,609 scientists, including Nobel Prize winners from around the world, signed the World Climate Declaration in August, announcing that there is NO CLIMATE EMERGENCY. They maintain that the climate has always changed and always will and that carbon dioxide is essential for life on this planet, not the villain they portend. They complain that politicians have weaponized it for their own purposes. And their purposes are power and money. We have seen these things, but we were, for too long, a voice crying in the wilderness. There are still those who are planning a return of the USA. They will destroy not America but the deep state, the unelected bureaucrats that believe they are the real power in Washington and continue to abuse it. Like Trump or not, no one strikes fear into the hearts of the Left like Donald Trump. People see, but they do not understand. People hear, but they do not comprehend. In the meantime, politicians both see and hear, but ignore. It is treason by omission. To witness a house burning with people inside and watch apathetic firefighters loiter outside, or worse yet, prevent victims from escaping, is worse than criminal. To hear children screaming from inside a school as they are being shot while police are gathered outside is beyond any reasonable limits. Those who have taken the oath of office have an obligation, a duty to preserve and protect the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic without regard to self, or was that only reserved for our founders? |
White America: Disappeared and Replaced
In the United States the majority of the population remains white despite 58 years of mass immigration of non-whites. Despite remaining a large majority, white Americans are not only being replaced but are being disappeared along with their history.
You no longer see white families in corporate ads. If a family is shown, it is a black man, white woman and mixed race children, or it is an Asian woman, white man and mixed race children. A white family has been given negative meaning as a statement against “diversity.” Diversity has trumped the basis of a nation state, which is a homogeneous population. A diverse, multicultural population is a Tower of Babel, not a nation. Without a common culture, there is not a common interest. Without a common interest, there is no nation, only a geographical boundary.
Ever since the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission created racial quotas in defiance of the statutory prohibition in the 1964 Civil Rights Act, white Americans, especially heterosexual males, have been second class citizens in law. It has been legal for 59 years to discriminate against white heterosexual males in university admissions, employment, promotion, and protection by law.
Recently, the US Supreme Court ruled that race-based university admissions are impermissible and inconsistent with the 14th Amendment. The ruling is a half century too late. Discrimination against white Americans is now institutionalized. Blacks are a small percentage of the population, but they are over-represented in positions of power. For example, the Secretary of Defense is black. The incoming Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is black. The Superintendent of the US Air Force Academy is black, and all three agree that there are too many white officers in the US military. They have announced an official policy of discriminating against white military personnel by denying whites promotions in military rank. This is a fact, not a “conspiracy theory.” It could not be more clear that despite the Supreme Court’s ruling, discrimination against white Americans will continue unabated.
White people are being demonized out of existence, and they are helpless, despite being a majority in an alleged democracy, to do anything about it. To protest demonization is to defend whiteness which is regarded as proof of white supremacy. It is regarded as racist for a white to deny his guilt.
Museum curators, themselves white, present the works of white art in their collections as “racist works.” The artistic value and achievement of white culture has been turned into expressions of racism. Heather Mac Donald has documented examples of this in her articles in City Journal.
White Americans are helpless to stand up for themselves, because half of them–the blue state half–have succumbed to the brainwashing and indoctrination that white people–only white people–are “aversive racists” by birth and skin color, and as such are threats to people of color. This argument justifies restraints on white people, such as second class legal status in order to ameliorate “white privilege.”
The statue of Robert E. Lee, a work of art by famous sculptors Henry Shrady and Leo Lantelli, stood in Charlottesville, Virginia, in memory of Lee’s leadership of the Army of Northern Virginia for a century. It was taken down in 2021 and has been given to a black organization that has announced that it will melt down the statue and cast the metal into something else, perhaps another statue of George Floyd who killed himself by overdosing on fentanyl.
Why does black self-expression and celebration of black heritage require the elimination of white heritage? Robert E. Lee was highly regarded by the US military in the service of which Lee gave his youth and middle age. Offered command of the Union Army he said he could not invade his own state and declined the command. A former superintendent of West Point, Lee fought honorably and morally, and West Point barracks were named after him. Now his memory is erased and his presence in history destroyed by lies.
This is America today for white people, few of whom have the courage and awareness to protest. Essentially American white people are being erased. Try to find white Anglo-Saxons in the Biden regime.
You can see white replacement in California. In 1970 the population of California was 76% white. The state was solidly Republican through the 1980s. Today the white percentage is 32%. Whites have been replaced in California by Asian immigrants and illegal immigrant-invaders who walked in, unopposed, across the border with Mexico. Today the largest percentage of California’s population is Hispanic.
Let’s hope Hispanics quickly take over the state from the crazed white liberals whose anti-white policies are causing white flight from California at the rate of 300,000 per year. California, Reagan territory in the 1980s, is today a state where the Republican political presence is minuscule.
The current white liberal governor of California, Gavin Newsom is the most anti-white, anti-American governor in US history. His policies have proven to be devastating for California. Yet they are tolerated by the Hispanic and Asian majority. Recall efforts were defeated despite the shrinking quality of life in California. The colonization of America by immigrant-invaders proceeds.
The Best of Paul Craig Roberts Paul Craig Roberts, a former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury and former associate editor of the Wall Street Journal, has been reporting shocking cases of prosecutorial abuse for two decades. A new edition of his book, The Tyranny of Good Intentions, co-authored with Lawrence Stratton, a documented account of how americans lost the protection of law, has been released by Random House. Visit his website.