20 Degenerate “Cultures” That Have Formed The Dystopia We’re Living In
Enjoy the freak show while it lasts
Welcome to the depraved new world. Forget the books and movies, because you’re already living in a dystopia. Take a moment to familiarize yourself with the following progressive cultures of our society that will show you what a wonderful world we now live in.
1. Victim Culture
Victim culture is the mother of all other social insanity that we are witnessing today.
But being a victim today is not without its perks. In one victim package you get: attention, sympathy, ego-boost, the right to censor other people, the right to attack people with impunity, freedom from criticism, financial support from the government and moronic sympathizers, an elevated status, plus other privileges. It’s no wonder so many people today are scrambling to claim their own victim status lest they find themselves at a disadvantage.
And if you ever wonder why these professional victims are so aggressive, you have to understand that victim playing is a zero-sum game where the winner is the biggest loser. There is only so much prize to be won and far too many competitors to play nice. Anyone who engages in victim Olympics must shove their opponents off the stage lest they lose the spotlight.
2. PC Culture
You know you’re living in a dystopia when cry-babies are policing your language.
We live in a toxic PC culture with an unprecedented level of control being imposed upon our daily lives.
While some of the most repulsive men and women are free to roam around naked in gay pride parades and slutwalks, scientist Matt Taylor was bullied until he apologized in tears for wearing a ‘sexist’ shirt his female friend made for him as a gift. And that’s just one of many examples of the politically correct terrorism we’re witnessing on a daily basis.
The most frightening aspect is that there is no knowing what you’ll be guilty of until it happens, for the PC police is always on the lookout for new things to get offended by and new ways to ruin your life. You are to conform and submit in fear, not knowing when or where the next blow will come.
3. “Rape Culture” Culture
Number of rapes has been free-falling while rape hysteria and false rape accusations are soaring.
Spreading lies about the “rape culture” is vital for the feminists to propagate their narrative of eternal victimhood. You can tell how obsessed they are with maintaining this fantasy with the way they spend more time bitching about it than doing anything to solve it, even going as far as shutting down police campaigns to prevent them.
4. Hypersensitivity Culture
In our infantilized society, just about everything is offensive and triggering. It can be anything from Halloween costumes, a priest in a robe, pro-Trump messages scrawled with chalk, differing opinions, to the word “upset.”
I’m surprised that social justice cowards are even able to muster up the courage to scream at people’s faces while they themselves have to snap their fingers because clapping is too triggering.
5. Shameless Culture
Giving tips on self-improvement? “Stop shaming me into marriage! I want to play my video games!”
Imagine yourself as an obese woman with no self-discipline. Do you:
A) Decide to be healthy by eating right and working out.
Or,
B) Bitch at everyone to accept you for who you are and call them fat-shamers if they gag in disgust from looking at your pile of lard.
“A” kind of requires effort, so…
6. Zero-Responsibility Culture
Why am I not surprised to find out that she’s a feminist?
Everyone today is perfect and nothing is ever their fault.
“It’s not my fault I’m fat, It’s my genes.”
“I feel like a slut after having drunk sex with him. It’s not my fault, I must’ve been raped.”
“I can’t attract women because [insert your usual excuse].”
“My life sucks and it’s all because of [select favorite scapegoat: Patriarchy, big government, evil white men, feminists, discrimination, Obama, etc.].”
7. Sexual Deviancy Culture
Sodom and Gomorrah had nothing compared to the sexual degeneracy of today. Now with homosexuality normalized and transsexuality also going mainstream, the door as flung open for all other sexual degeneracy to follow. Expect more furries, bestiality, pedophilia, and other biology-defying sexual deviance in the near future.
8. “Empowerment” Culture
Feminist terror movement needs government force like fish needs water.
“Empowerment” is a code word for all the losers who desperately need to compensate for their insecurities. The truth is that the only way these leaches are able to “empower” themselves is by shoving others down while sucking off society’s sympathy and resources.
9. Oppressor Guilt Culture
“I’m so sorry for being white, just please don’t call me a racist again!”
When the victims start oppressing their “oppressors,” the wimps among them will break down and start feeling guilty for their very existence.
10. “I’m Disgusting, So I’ll Bring Everyone Else Down To My Level” Culture
Feminist role model for today’s dumb and shallow American girls. The future certainly looks sparkling.
When feminists can’t improve themselves (which is always), they need to start poisoning everyone and everything around them. This is especially prominent among the sluts who feel the need to turn all other decent women into drunken whores. Go to a feminist site like Jezebel and you’ll see how they openly teach women to corrupt themselves.
11. Special Snowflake Culture
“Look! I dyed my hair blue and got retarded tattoos, now I’m unique and special like the other attention-whores!”
Everyone is so unique and special like everyone else, and we have to respect their individuality no matter how stupid and repulsive they are. If you don’t have any real accomplishments to speak of, your self-perceived uniqueness is the next best thing.
12. “You Can Be Anything You Want” Culture
If you’re still innocent enough to think that male and female are the only sex identities, consider yourself spared. You’ll be surprised to know that we now have a dozen or more different types of sexual identities (I lost track of them after trans-whatever), along with other batshit made-up identities. Our world has gone completely insane with mentally sick individuals coming up with new ways to identify themselves just to see how low they can go.
13. Infantilized Culture
Adults in New York paying up to $1000 to be in preschool again.
It’s not just the cry-babies in colleges who are infantilized, but the adults as well. This sort of degeneracy, along with the others on this list, only seem to be prevalent in large cities, which is why I now refuse to live in one.
14. Diversity For The Sake Of Diversity Culture
Excellent photoshop job by the Canadian Socialist Republic’s Ministry of Truth.
Everything, everyone, and every space must now be
enforcedenriched with diversity, which is our strength (whatever that means)—everything except our political opinions, of course.15. Go Cry To The Authorities Culture
Nothing says strong and independent woman like crying to the UN for help.
Want to make easy money? Play professional victim and beg people to crowd fund you.
Is someone making fun of you on Twitter? Whine about sexism and get him censored or fired from his job.
Want to get back at your ex-lover? Cry rape and get him kicked out of school or jailed without a shred of evidence. Even if he doesn’t get convicted, his life will still be ruined.
16. Nanny-State Culture
The professional whiners of today complain that they even have to go cry to the government to receive the pampering they seek. They believe Big Brother should turn the entire society into a giant safe space while being spoiled with freebies until they die.
17. Knee-Jerk Hostility Culture
When identity-politics gets out of control, people start to develop knee-jerk reaction to those who they consider their enemies:
White male? “Your opinions are worthless, cis-scum. Go kill yourself.”
Skin colour is a shade browner than an Ivory soap? “Filthy muslim kebab, wait till we exterminate you.”
Not excited about having multiculturalism and pansexuality shoved down your throat?“You ignorant, Nazi piece of shit! Intolerant assholes like you need to disappear from the world!”
Not enthusiastic about putting anyone left of Pinochet into gas chambers? “I’m going to punch your mouth you cultural-Marxist filth! Calm down? Don’t try to censor me you Leftist faggot!”
18. The “-ist” Culture
Person A: “Oh, you’re just a _____-ist, so your opinions are invalid.”
Person B: “Shut up, _____-ist! You’re just delusional.”
19. Labeling People With Political Mental Illness Culture
Not only are the patients running the asylum, but they’re also diagnosing YOU with mental illness.
“You don’t like gay Muslims? Since I’m a doctor with a PhD in Social Justice, I’m going to diagnose you with homophobia and islamophobia. My treatment is going to be to shame you for your mental illness you until you shut up.”
20. Emasculation Culture
Emasculation of men starts early in today’s America with feckless parents who enable it.
When feminists, government, and the entire culture is harping for female empowerment at the expense of men, the result should be obvious: the systematic emasculation of men at all ages. Today, men are starting to talk like women, more men are turning homosexual, and more of them are changing sex. For the wimps, when it’s too difficult to be a man, it’s far easier to just abandon ship.
The Verdict
It’s the only way to be sure.
I realistically don’t see any hope of peaceful return to a patriarchal (or just normal) social order even if Trump becomes dictator for life. Nothing short of violent upheaval will reverse the cultural decay we’re witnessing today. Our society is going on a downward spiral and it can’t burn down fast enough.
Category Archives: Uncategorized
Microaggressions & The Rise of HYPERSENSITIVE Victimhood Culture
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTROCGb5qj8
Preview YouTube video Microaggressions & The Rise of HYPERSENSITIVE Victimhood Culture
As time progresses, I am getting more and more of those “senior moments”. I am forgetting the names of people whom I have recently seen, the names of people I grew up with, the names of books and authors that I have long admired, the names of movies that had a great impact on my thinking. I forget where I left my car keys (damn it I had them in my hand 10 minutes ago!). I forget that I left my sunglasses on the roof of the car before I drove off. I forget, well, you get the picture.
So maybe you can help me out here. Tell me if I am wrong. Tell me if my memory is failing. I seem to recall that a couple of years ago, when three Western African nations were threatened by a frightening outbreak of the Ebola virus, nations like Australia, Jamaica and the United States placed an immediate ban on travellers from those nations. The decision was founded on the common sense belief that while the overwhelming majority of citizens living in Sierra Leone and Liberia were not carrying the Ebola virus, some were, and that at that point no one knew who they were. Therefore the safe play was to place an embargo on all of them, all of them who wanted to leave their countries and find safety here. It would have been phenomenally and criminally stupid to risk the welfare of our own citizens in order to genuflect to “migrant rights”, would it not?
What I don’t recall, however, is hearing any outraged liberal or Social Justice Warrior denounce this temporary measure as bigoted and ignorant. I don’t remember any of them calling public health officials “racist”, or lashing out a politician who backed the decision of the Center for Disease Control to act swiftly to protect Americans. After all, the first responsibility of elected leaders is to ensure public safety.
Yet, just over a year later, after the San Bernadino murders and the terrorist attacks in Brussels, politicians and commentators of every stripe denounced Donald Trump’s call for a ban on all Muslim immigration as outrageous and appalling. Banning all Muslims from entering this country, Mr. Trump? All Muslims? Really? Why that runs counter to everything this country stands for!
Yet, the rationale for Trump’s proposal was founded on the very same considerations that led to the blanket ban on the entry of people from regions afflicted by Ebola to the United States. Trump argued that Muslim applicants had not been vetted. True. He argued that even if 99.9% of Muslim applicants were OK, but 00.1% were not OK, we couldn’t take the chance that a hundred terrorists, or even one terrorist was among them. After all, it took what, just 19 Muslim conspirators to bring down the Twin Towers? Moreover, he emphasized that the ban he proposed would be temprorary. A fact that the liberal media seemed to have missed Once the dust had settled, and potential threats clearly identified, the ban would be lifted. Sounds reasonable to me.
Think about it this way. The ideology that inspires ISIL is communicable. It is a virus that afflicts a relatively tiny portion of the total Muslim population abroad, but nevertheless has spread with enormous speed and scope. Intelligence and law enforcement agencies have not been able to keep on top of it. Who many ISIL operatives are out there? Who are they? Where are they? We don’t know.
Health officials in Liberia and Sierra Leone were possessed of the same kind of questions. And they didn’t have the answers. All that they knew, all that we knew, was that the virus had to be contained. But how do you contain a virulent and seemingly unstoppable virus like that? Well, there is one thing you don’t do. You don’t throw the borders wide open. You don’t wave everyone through the gate because to do otherwise would be a violation of their “rights”. You don’t forget that the primary obligation of any government, any President is, to repeat, protect public safety, not the people who seem to think that they have a divine entitlement to emigrate to your country. These are all things you don’t do. But then what do you do in the face of a threat like this?
You lock that damn gate and slam your front and back doors tight, that’s what.
Interview With Dan Murray, Founder of Immigration Watch Canada
Canada Was NOT Created by Immigrants of Diverse Races: A Statistical Demonstration
 |
| Canadian Soldiers in WW I |
One of the most powerful memes in Canada is that “Canada is a nation of immigrants”. Millions of individuals have indeed migrated to Canada since John Cabot first claimed either Newfoundland or Cape Breton Island for England in 1497. But the intended meaning of this phrase goes well beyond this simple fact.
This phrase, continuously repeated by the media, and shoved down the throats of unsuspecting students from primary to higher education, is intended to fashion an image of Canada as a nation populated from the beginning by peoples from diverse cultures and racial backgrounds, in order to portray the Third World immigration patterns we have been witnessing since the 1970s as if they were a natural continuation — continuation naturelle — of past migration patterns, rather than as what they are: a radical departure aimed at the termination of Canada’s deep-seated European ethnic character.
What follows is a statistical refutation of this deceptive meme. The historical record, the facts we have about the people who came to Canada, the racial makeup of the immigrants, the proportion of Whites to non-Whites, the birth rate of Eurocanadians, the rates of immigration versus the domestic fertility rates, demonstrate, to the contrary, that Canada was a nation created from top to bottom by immigrants from Europe and by Eurocanadians born in Canada, with next to zero contributions by non-Europeans.
The Facts
 |
| Facts to lean on |
- In 1871, according to the first census after Confederation, of the total population of 3.2 million, 32 percent were of French ancestry, 24 percent Irish, 20 percent English, 16 percent Scottish, and 6 percent German. Notice, therefore, that we should acknowledge the immense importance of the Irish and Scots in the first centuries of “English Canada”. There were only 21,500 blacks and 23,000 natives in 1871; by contrast, there were 202,991 persons of German origin.
- Canada cannot “accurately be portrayed at Confederation as a nation of immigrants”. In 1867, 79 percent had been born in Canada. Over the 400 years before Confederation, there were only “two quite limited periods” of substantial arrivals of immigrants: from 1783 to 1812, and from 1830 to 1850. In these two periods, the immigrants were “overwhelmingly of British origin”. Immigration was not a major factor in population growth from 1850 to the end of the nineteenth century. From 1871 to 1891, “a high rate of naturalincrease allowed the population of Canada to grow from 3.7 million to 4.8 million”.
 |
| Ukrainian Farming Family, Saskatchewan |
- From 1608 to 1760, immigration to New France consisted of only 10,000 settlers, and thereafter it was “almost non-existent”. The French-speaking population numbered about 90,000 by 1770s, and thereafter, until the late 1800s, the population expanded rapidly with women having 5.6 surviving children on average. The increase in population in Lower Canada from 330,000 in 1815 to 890,000 in 1851 “was mainly attributable to the continuing high birth rate within the French-speaking community”. By 1950, the Quebec population was almost 4 million. This increase was not a result of immigration, but primarily of the still continuing high fertility rates. It was only in the 1970s that Montreal saw an increasing inflow of non-European immigrants.
- Between 1896 and 1914, Canada experienced high immigration levels with more than 3 million arriving within this period. However, the ethnic composition of the nation remained 84 percent of British and French origin, while the European component rose to 9 percent. Between 1900 and 1915, the high mark in “Asian immigration” before the 1960s, 50,000 immigrants of Japanese, East Indian and Chinese descent arrived, but this number comprised less than 2 percent of the total immigration flow. In contrast, in 1914, there were nearly 400,000 Germans in Canada, the largest ethnic group apart from the British (which includes the Irish and Scots) and French.
 |
| English Immigrants |
- The total intake of immigrants between 1946 and 1962 was 2,151,505. At the same time however, between 1941 and 1962, the population of Canada increased from 11.5 million to 18.5 million, “largely accounted” by Canada’s “extremely high domestic birth rates”, the so-called baby boom generation. Ninety percent of all immigrants who came to Canada before 1961 were from Britain.
- It was only after the institutionalization of official multiculturalism in 1971 that immigrants from Africa, the Caribbean, Latin America, the Middle East and Asia at large started to arrive in large numbers. During the 1970s, the proportion originating in Europe was cut by half, whereas the proportion coming from Asia almost quadrupled. Of the 1.5 million who came between 1971 and 1981, 33 percent came from Asia, 16 percent from the Caribbean and South America and 5.5 percent from Africa.
- In the period 1991-2001, immigrants of European origin fell below 20 percent at the same time that Asian immigration soared to nearly 60 percent. From 1991 to 2000, 2.2 million immigrants were accepted, the “highest ever for any decade”. In recent years, Canada’s visible minority population has been growing much faster than its total population: 22 percent growth from 1996 to 2001 versus 4 percent growth in the general population. Today, roughly one out of every four people in Canada is a member of a visible minority.
Fight Against Multicultural Revisionism!
 |
| George Orwell (1984) on the totalitarian method of manipulating history |
Don’t let them deceive you! Copy these facts and use them against the deceivers occupying our educational establishments. Don’t believe the globalist claim that your nation was a creation of diverse races and that “White racists” were supposedly hiding away the equal contribution of non-European immigrants. This is a historical falsehood of major proportions. Canada was created by people of British and French descent, and other European ancestries. All the institutions, legal system, educational curriculum, transformation of wilderness into productive farms, all the cities, the parliamentary traditions, the churches, the entire infrastructure of railways, ports, shipping industries, and highways, were created by hardworking Eurocanadians.
Sources
It should be noted that the following authors try to portray Canada as a nation that was from its beginning created by diverse immigrants leading to the official enactment of multiculturalism by P.E. Trudeau in 1971. Nevertheless the facts they bring out, which are the ones contained in the documents, show that Canada was a nation homogeneously White from its very beginnings.
- J. M. Bumstead, Canada’s Diverse Peoples: A Reference Sourcebook, 2003
- J. M. Bumstead, The People’s of Canada: A Pre-Confederation History, 2003 and The People’s of Canada: A Post-Confederation History, 2004
- Ninette Kelley and Michael Trebilcock, The Making of the Mosaic. A History of Canadian Immigration Policy, 1998
- Roger Riendeau, A Brief History of Canada, 2007
For your information, we are sending you our latest bulletin : "Don't Apologize To The Sikhs---Part 1" Respectfully, Daniel Murray www.ImmigrationWatchCanada.org ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++
Don’t Apologize To The Sikhs—Part 1
Prime Minister Trudeau has recently announced that on May 18 he will make an apology in Parliament to Sikhs. Most of the 376 Sikhs aboard a ship called the Komagata Maru were denied entry to Canada in 1914. According to aggressive Sikhs, Canada had no justification for doing this. Undoubtedly, a number of other Sikhs are cringing at Trudeau's announcement because they believe that the incident was much more complicated than the picture a group of Sikhs claim it was. They also think the Sikhs have already received an apology and that endless, aggressive Sikh demands are alienating most Canadians. Most Canadians, including our Prime Minister, know little about the Komagata Maru issue. We offer the following facts to inform Mr. Trudeau and other Canadians of the historical record in 1914 and of numerous other shameless recent Sikh actions. (1) Gurdit Singh, the leader of the Komagata Maru voyage, had successfully challenged British authorities in a Singapore court on an unrelated matter. His victory gave him confidence that he could get Canada to accept his 376 passengers. In fact, he boasted to authorities that after landing his 376 mostly Sikh passengers, he would take another 25,000 to Canada. In 1914, Vancouver had a population between 60,000 and 70,000. Twenty-five thousand additional Sikhs would have significantly diluted the European-based population, added to the ongoing conflict over low-wage Asian workers and inflamed concern that B.C.'s population could be overwhelmed by large numbers of Asians. Many crude Sikhs like to suggest that Canada had no right to defend its B.C. population and workers from being culturally and economically overwhelmed by Asians. Ironically, B.C. resentment was very similar to the resentment that the Chinese and East Indians felt towards European colonizers in their countries at the same time. If Chinese and East Indians were justified in resisting colonization, so were Canadians who faced a similar danger from huge numbers of Chinese and East Indians. (2) The Komagata Maru incident was preceded by the Panama Maru incident of October 17, 1913. That event helps to explain much of what happened in the Komagata Maru incident 7 months later. The Panama Maru had carried 56 East Indians to Canada. Most of the passengers had not lived in Canada previously, but falsely claimed that they had. They produced fake money order receipts, time cards, etc. to substantiate their claims. Immigration authorities allowed 17 (those physically recognized to have been here before) to land, but they detained 39 of the 56. A Board of Inquiry looked into the case and ordered that the 39 be deported, but litigious East Indians in Canada determined to make the Panama Maru case a test case. Their lawyer J.Edward Bird appeared before Justice Dennis Murphy, the author of a Royal Commission which had investigated Chinese Immigration Fraud. He ruled against the East Indians. Bird then went to Chief Justice Gordon Hunter, who was notorious for appearing drunk in court and who was a clear embarrassment to the government. He allowed the 39 to stay. Even 4 of the 39 who had been ordered deported for medical reasons, escaped from detention and could not be found. Canadian immigration authorities became determined not to let these people humiliate them again. (3) The crude members of the Sikhs claim that the Sikhs aboard the Komagata Maru were unjustly treated. The reality is that the Sikhs were merely one part of an ongoing battle that the Vancouver / Southern British Columbia population had already been involved in with low-wage Japanese and Chinese. When the federal government introduced a $500 Head Tax on the Chinese to protect Canadians in 1905, the number of Chinese passengers on the Canadian Pacific (CP) Steamships fell substantially. To end the drop in CP passenger traffic, CP aggressively advertised tickets in India in order to get East Indians like the Sikhs to travel. In 1907, 901 East Indians arrived, doubling B.C. 's East Indian population. In the first 10 months of 1907, a total of about 11,500 East Indians, Japanese and Chinese arrived---an overwhelming number compared to other years. Most of this number were Japanese who had violated Japanese law by not getting Japanese government permission to travel to Canada from Hawaii (where they were working as farm labourers). Half of Vancouver's population, more than 30,000 paraded through Vancouver streets on Labour Day, in September, 1907 to protest the arrival of these people. Many of the 11,500 migrants were illegals or unneeded labourers who were imported to displace Canadian workers. The Vancouver Riot of 1907 followed the parade. (4) The immigration lobby has completely distorted the 1907 Vancouver Riot and all of the events before it. The crude propagandists among the Sikhs like to cite Ottawa's "Continuous Passage" law as an example of punishment of Sikhs, They conveniently omit the point that the law was primarily intended to stop illegal Japanese labourers from leaving Hawaii and causing unnecessary job competition in B.C. The law was later applied to East Indians for the same reason. The Vancouver Parade and Riot of 1907 should be remembered in our media and school textbooks as events in which Vancouver residents actually defended themselves against unnecessary and overwhelming immigration. Vancouver residents have to revive the Spirit of 1907 !!. END OF PART 1
__ Demography is Destiny by Jerry Vila, demographer. Hard hitting. Colourful dvd about the immigration invasion and falling European birthrates. $20.00
__ White Guilt Reconsidered by Robert Jarvis. NEW Canadian context. Looks at behaviour of Indians and Asiatics in British Columbia. Great antidote to White Guilt. His last booklet. $7.00
_ Harry Stevens: Immigration Reformer, Reconstructionist, Canada Firster by Robert Jarvis. A portrait of a populist hero and the leader of Canada’s Asiatic exclusionist movement in the early 20th Century. $6.00
__ The Workingman’s Revolt: the Vancouver Asiatic Exclusion Rally of 1907 by Robert Jarvis. A chapter of suppressed history detailing the successful fight against Third World Immigration in the early years of the 20th Century. $5.00
__ The “Komagata Maru” Incident: A Canadian Immigtration Battle Revisited by Robert Jarvis. Rediscovered Canadian history. The Canadian Government in 1914 reluctantly gave in to majority pressure to deport a shipload of Sikh illegals. A Sikh terrorist then assassinated William Hopkinson, a Canadian Government official. JUSTIN TRUDEAU SHOULD READ THIS. HE PLANS TO MAKE ANOTHER APOLOGY IN PARLIAMENT FOR THE KOMAGATA MARU. No apology needed. Canada was right in 1914! $5.00
Name:_________________________
