Monthly Archives: September 2025
Canadian Taxpayers Fund “Gender Justice” in Rice Production in Vietnam: Why Not Cut OUR Taxes?
Dangerous Countries: Ask Your MP
The Twilight of the White Ethnicities
Paul Craig Roberts • Thursday, September 18, 2025 • 1,600 Words
By closing the border Trump Has Delayed for a Few Years the Destruction of White Ethnic America, but He Is Unable To Prevent a World in Which There Are No White Ethnic countries.
Why Hasn’t Biden prosecutor Jack Smith Been Arrested and Indicted? The Answer is that Republicans Are Wimps. They are scared to actually fight.
The Democrats Tried to Indict and to Destroy the Entire Republican Party.
Will the Wimp Republicans do anything about it?
Scope of FBI probe into Trump revealed:
The Biden-era investigation into alleged 2020 election interference turned out to have been far wider than originally thought
https://www.rt.com/news/624822-trump-fbi-probe-republicans/
At least 92 Republican-linked people and organizations were the focus of a Biden-era FBI investigation into alleged attempts by Trump to overturn the 2020 election, newly unclassified files show.
The trove of documents was unveiled by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) during a panel hearing on Tuesday.
The probe, dubbed “Arctic Frost,” kicked off in April 2022 and was jointly conducted by the FBI and other agencies, becoming the foundation for former Biden special counsel Jack Smith to bring criminal charges against now-President Donald Trump.
The investigation focused on an alleged “multifaceted conspiracy to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election so that former President Trump could remain in office,” the documents show.
The records reveal that “Arctic Frost” was much broader than just an electoral matter” and that the probe promptly “expanded to Republican organizations,” including the late Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA group. Kirk was killed on September 10, 2025, while speaking to an audience at Utah Valley University. One thousand of the students were accessories to Kirk’s murder, because they protested his appearance on campus, thereby creating a climate of hate that resulted in Kirk’s murder. We should despise those students even though they are the typical products of American education today. American education produces anti-Americans.
Senator Grassley reports that some of the Republicans “the FBI sought to place under political investigation included the Republican National Committee, Republican Attorneys General Association, and Trump political groups.” In other words, it was an effort to destroy the Republican Party.
“Arctic Frost wasn’t just a case to politically investigate Trump,” the senator reported. “It was a vehicle by which partisan FBI agents and Department of Justice prosecutors could achieve their partisan ends and improperly investigate the entire Republican political apparatus.” Grassley should have added that the corrupt “investigation” had the full support of the American whore media.
Shortly after the release of the documents, Trump took to Truth Social to slam Smith and the Biden administration over their corrupt investigation.
“They tried to force Charlie [Kirk], and many other people and movements, out of business. They Weaponized the Justice Department against Sleepy Joe Biden’s Political Opponents, including ME!” Trump wrote.
Smith resigned from his role ahead of Trump’s inauguration but defended his politically motivated probe and his decision to bring the false charges. Trump has repeatedly claimed that the ultimate purpose of the investigation was to derail his 2024 presidential bid. Actually, the purpose was to imprison Trump and to destroy the Republican Party. But this is too scary for even Trump to acknowledge.
Aleksandr Dugan, one of Russia’s top intellects, concludes that “Charlie Kirk’s murder is the beginning of a liberal, globalist attack against all ordinary people.” https://www.rt.com/shows/rt-interview/624612-dugin-charlie-kirk-murder-violence/
Dugin is correct. Every Western European government has turned against its ethnic base because it is white and, thereby, racist. The members of the Western governments were taught that they are racists by their elite universities. Western governments no longer protect their own ethnic citizens. The governments protect the immigrant-invaders. In Britain and Sweden, and I believe the entirety of Western Europe, immigrant-invaders by virtue of their dark skin have the de facto right to rape white women, even children. The scandal of the mass gang-rapes of ethnic British women and children that the British government, regardless of party, has been covering up for 30 years has finally resulted in the mass protests by ethnic British. The protests are ongoing as I write.
The British Prime Minister, Starmer, and the Muslim female Home Minister both made it clear that the UK government represents the invaders, not the ethnic British citizens. The British Prime Minister declared that the “racist protesters” could not use the British flag to symbolize their protest, because the British flag represents multiculturalism, diversity, and a Tower of Babel, not ethnic British. Starmer declared that the protest from what was once the British nation was a racist rebellion against “diversity”and sicced the British police on the ethnic British citizens. Today if you are a citizen of Great Britain, you are subject to oppression by your own government in addition to the crimes and gang-rapes of your women by the immigrant-invaders. The ethnic British have failed to resist an invasion, and they have been conquered.
Little information about the protests comes from the whore Western media other than the whore media’s assurances that the protesters are racists and far-right. The American and Western European media’s position on the invasion of their countries by the Third World millions is identical to the position of the French and European media and governments in Jean Raspail’s book, The Camp of the Saints: The immigrant-invaders deserve our country and we must let them have it to make up for our sins against non-white peoples. Colonialism, slavery, all that sort of thing. In Raspail’s book there is no will to resist the immigrant-invaders destruction of European civilization and population.
The growing protests in Britain against being ruled by a government that represents immigrant-invaders is pointless, because it is non-violent. The British police unleashed by the Muslim Home Minister on the protesters– ethnic Britishers–the British government’s protection of gang-rapists, the British government’s imprisonment of ethnic British for protesting in defense of the English, indicates the direction of the fate of every Western country. They are doomed, because they are white and comprise a tiny minority of the world population that has been taught to hate them for their oppression of non-whites. The irony is that the hatred was taught to the non-whites by the whites themselves at Oxford, Cambridge, Harvard, Yale, Stanford, and so on.
Harvard, Yale, Oxford, Cambridge are accessories to the murder of Western Civilization.
Karl Marx, a reviled person by those who never bothered to read him, concluded that violence is the only effective force in history. Formerly I opposed this view, but historically it seems to be essentially correct.
If the besieged white ethnicities care to save themselves–and by now they might be too brainwashed and indoctrinated into their guilt to have the will to resist–they will have to resort to a lot of violence. The longer they wait, the less their chances. I expect that in the future the white race will exist only in a few zoos as examples of racist exploiters who were overthrown.
There is a chance that Charlie Kirk’s murder and the opposition of ethnic British to the British government that denies them and their women and children the protection of law, will wake up the insouciant white ethnicities that are marked for extermination. But there are only a few signs of white people waking up. Below are two:
Here is Scott Adams working his way into the possibility that only violence can save white ethnicities. https://x.com/jayplemons/status/1966181262349226011
White people either fight for their lives or they don’t. The question is whether whites are already conquered by their educational indoctrination.
The other example is a social media post that I cannot find at this moment. It asked the point of Trump sending the National Guard to blue cities defying the US government. Instead, send the US Air Force. In other words, obliterate the anti-American blue cities just as Israel has done to Palestine. The social media posts suggest that some white people are beginning to wake up and recognize reality. The enemies of traditional Americans are internal. The attacks on family, white people, sexual morality, Christianity, free speech, the Constitution, equal protection of law, and truth all come from the Democrat liberal-left, not from Russia, China, and Iran. By focusing on alleged external enemies, the Trump regime keeps the focus off of the real threat.
If Netanyahu had Kirk assassinated in order to avoid losing his brainwashed American conservative supporters who were being awakened by Kirk to Israel’s criminality, the Israel Lobby will use the American media to control the narrative, and Kirk’s assassination will be blamed on the NRA for defending the Second Amendment. By controlling the narrative, Kirk’s assassination can be eliminated as a rallying cry.
Currently, Trump, on whom the aware Americans place hope, is in England assuring the solidity of the US/UK alliance as the UK government turns England over to immigrant-invaders.
Can Americans really expect any different outcome?
In Jean Raspail’s 1973 prediction of the fate of guilt-ridden white people, not even the tough Soviet communists survive. They, also, succumb to the white disease of self-doubt, and white people cease to exist.
I have been watching Raspail’s prediction come true step by step for 52 years. The Camp of the Saints is now upon us.
Right to Life Means the Right to Own Guns
Canadians are disillusioned with a justice system that does not
protect the law-abiding Majority. They are fed up with the
impotence of the police, the perpetrator-friendly courts and,
when a homeowner fights back against an intruder, the tendency
of the system to charge the innocent homeowner. The National
Post (September 10, 2025) reported: “A strong majority of
Canadians feels they have the right to defend their home against
intruders — and more than half say they don’t always feel safe in
their neighbourhoods and that the justice system is working
against their interests, new polling shows. “I don’t think that’s a
healthy sentiment in Canada if over half don’t really feel the
justice system is working in their interest,” Andrew Enns,
Leger’s executive vice-president, said Tuesday about the findings
of a new national Postmedia-Leger poll.The pollster said that
could lead to situations where people say, “the law doesn’t
respect me, why should I respect the law?”
Eighty-seven per cent of respondents sided with using reasonable
force against an intruder. In Manitoba and Saskatchewan, as well
as among Canadians aged 55 and up, the number of those who
believe citizens have the right to defend themselves during a
break-in climbed to 92 per cent. … The poll was conducted after
the Aug. 18 incident where Kawartha Lakes Police charged a
Lindsay, Ont., homeowner with aggravated assault and assault
with a weapon after he allegedly used a knife against an intruder
armed with a crossbow.
After police charged the homeowner, Ontario Premier Doug
Ford spoke out about a person’s right to protect themselves and
their family from home intruders and said the justice system is
“broken.”
In late August, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre called on
the federal government to spell out in law that Canadians have
the right to use force, including deadly force, against someone
who enters their home illegally and poses a threat to their safety.
…More than half of those polled (54 per cent) said they “feel the
justice system — the courts and the laws — is working against
the interests of law-abiding citizens.” Support peaked for that
sentiment in British Columbia, at 59 per cent.
Nearly a third of respondents (29 per cent) indicated “the justice
system is protecting the interests of Canadians,” and 17 per cent
said they “don’t know.”
Leger’s online survey of 1,592 Canadians aged 18 or older was
conducted between Sept. 5 and 7. A margin of error cannot be
calculated for a panel survey. For comparison purposes, a
probability sample of the same size would have a margin of error
of plus or minus 2.5 per cent, 19 times out of 20.”
The party line of our Liberal government is that the justice
system is “systemically racist.” Yes, despite law schools
churning out woke lawyers and judges, we’re supposed to
believe that racism rules. The reason is that Blacks and native
Indians are disproportionately in the prison system. The cultural
Marxist believes all people are equal. If the results are not equal
or the same, it must be racism. A simpler explanation is that
Blacks and native Indians commit disproportionately more
violent crimes than the rest of the population. For over 20 years,
since the Gladue decision, we’ve had the “native discount” —
lesser penalties for Indians committing serious crimes.
Informally, something similar is in place for Blacks. So, the
dispossessed Majority suffers as the system coddles criminals.
Michael Bator, People’s Party of Canada candidate in
Burlington, argues: “Let’s be honest. Much of this crime wave is
tied directly to mass immigration and a broken refugee system.
Criminal gangs and cultural incompatibility are bleeding into our
neighborhoods. Illegals and non-citizens walk across the border,
and when they commit crimes, they are coddled by Ottawa
instead of deported. That has to end. If you commit a crime
here and you’re not a citizen, you should be deported the
same day. Canadians never voted to import crime and danger
into their own homes.”
Several years ago during a rash of carjackings and break ins to
steal cars, a senior officer advised people to leave their car keys
visible inside the front door so that the criminals would not get
frustrated and resort to violence. Similar surrender advice was
repeated recently. After a home invasion in Kleinburg, Ontario
left a father dead, York Regional Police Chief Jim MacSween
told concerned residents the "best defence for most people is to
comply" instead of taking matters into their own hands. The
statement sparked public outrage, with many feeling it was
callously disconnected from their realities. In her latest piece for
The Hub, CCF Executive Director Joanna Baron argues the
right to self-defence is a basic and long-recognized principle, and
that Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre’s proposed
“Stand on Guard” amendment to the Criminal Code is a step
in the right direction.
Self defence is a moral issue. Do you have the right to life and
your property? If you answer yes, then it follows that you have
the right to the means to defend that right. To deny the right to
the means of self-defence nullifies your right to life. An
important means of self-defence is guns, including handguns.
Further purchase of handguns was outlawed several years ago by
Justin Trudeau, who, of course, was surrounded by armed
guards! We must argue strongly for the right of Canadians to own
and CARRY guns, including handguns for self-defence. Of
course, some will argue that, under the “peace, order and good
government” section of the BNA Act, the government will
protect us (peace, order) from crime. Ideally, that’s true, but it’s
obvious that government can’t always effectively protect
citizens. Police admit as much. So, the responsibility for self-
defence often reverts to the citizen. We must insist that the laws
be changed: that, after proper safety training, Canadians should
have the right to own and CARRY guns for their self-defence.
Furthermore, Canada’s ridiculous regulations about safe storage– trigger locks, gun cabinets, ammunition stored in a different place — make quick access to a loaded firearm, a necessity during a burglary or home invasion, extremely difficult. These should be replaced with a common sense requirement that weapons be safely stored given the circumstances. Hence, a loaded handgun kept in an unlocked drawer might be unsafe storage, if you had a three year old in your house. – Paul Fromm
Dear Wab
Nahanni Fontaine. We’ve heard about the recent behavior of this individual, a Minister of Families – of all positions. Before providing some views on Fontaine and her position below, I ask this – which families are or were Nahanni Fontaine representing?
Nahanni Fontaine cruelly disparaged another person in the public realm – Mr. Charlie Kirk, a practicing conservative. Before his sudden and very public murder, Charlie Kirk was a family advocate and family man, being married with children, and providing undisputable reasons for others to do likewise – pairbond and raise the next generation.
Nahanni did not personally know, nor even understand the positions Charlie maintained, but maliciously slandered a murdered man with vacuous disparagement.
We see this immediately below:
“A racist, xenophobic, transphobic, islamophobic, sexist, white nationalist mouthpiece…inciting hatred in this country”. Is Fontaine suggesting that Kirk was inciting hatred in Manitoba, in Canada? How? Does Fontaine even know how? Does Fontaine even understand what she writes? Many think not.
My takeaway from this rant is that Fontaine knows not of what she is talking about by using trendy verbiage to describe the background of in-depth understanding of a multitude of issues that Kirk sought to address publicly.
Is Member of the Legislative Assembly of Manitoba Nahanni Fontaine, and the caucus she represents, suggesting that we should not discuss the issues that newly murdered Charlie Kirk tried to publicly address?
It appears that Fontaine herself, and maybe even the Manitoba NDP Caucus itself, would seriously wish to limit any serious discussion on social issues that Kirk himself wished to address, issues that also have impact upon the people of Manitoba. Fontaine provided the people of Manitoba with hate filled vile unproven rhetoric and invective upon a newly murdered man. A murdered man. Murdered in full recorded public viewing. Yet disparaged with contemptuous maliciousness.
Charlie Kirk brought public discussion to issues that provincial, state and federal governments in the U.S. and Canada forced upon the public – without much of any discussion between “the government” and the citizens of Canada and the U.S.
Kirk engaged people in real debate and discussion over issues that Fontaine herself shows little in the way of understanding. The personally inhumane invective toward Charlie Kirk from an appointed representative Manitoba will not sit well with many many people.
In written form seen above, the behavior of Nahanni Fontaine is well beyond the realm of understanding past and current issues and concerns facing both Canadians and Americans alike. Fontaine’s egregiously contemptuous behavior is well beyond suitable for a member of a member of a Legislative Assembly in Manitoba. People across North America are now questioning Nahanni Fontaine’s development as a person.
I have offered direction to you to have Nahanni Fontaine removed from the NDP Caucus, and the Manitoba Legislative Assembly. If her constituents of St. Johns, and the NDP Caucus continue to support her in upcoming business pertaining to Manitobans, it will reflect to the public what all three individual and combined entities are to the public.
Yours Truly
Michael a. brentnall
WINNIPEG
Katie Hopkins Electrifies London Rally to Stop Immigration Invasion. Katie Hopkins Speaks Like her or love her she makes sense and when addressing a crowd of millions in London on the 13th September 2025 she certainly had the support of the crowd.
Whose Decides Canada’s Identity?
