Trudeau’s Islamophilia Puts Canadians at Risk
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-KSzhgQx1ZA
This is another spirited video by Evalion with some good footage from CAFE’s demonstration outside Iqra Khalid’s office protesting her anti-Islamophobia motion M-103.
Two small errors in this video:
1. M-103 hasn’t been voted on yet. That will be April. What was passed was an anti-Islamophobia motion in the Ontario Legislature. Tory leader Patrick Brown betrayed his supporters by jumping on the politically correct bandwagon.
2. Unless we halt the immigration invasion, the European founding/settler people of Canada will be replaced by Third Worlders. It is less certain that the new majority will be majority Moslem.


A recent poll on YouGov BrandIndex is showing a negative correlation between Starbuck’s brand perception before and after they announced a plan to hire refugees, and it should be cause for alarm for the coffee giant.
On January 29, 2017, Starbucks CEO Howard Schulz announced that the company would implement a five-year plan to hire 10,000 refugees worldwide. The stance was in protest against President Donald Trump’s then travel ban on refugees from certain countries already outlined by the Obama administration. The announcement caused outrage and concern among many Starbucks customers, some of whom called for a boycott. People all over the country took to social media to express just how upset they were about the announcement.
The biggest issue raised among people that weighed in was that an American company was being so quick to come to the aide of refugees, but it felt as if American citizens, particularly veterans, were being ignored. Ultimately, Starbucks felt the pressure and issued a second statement to explain to America’s military veterans that the company also had a plan to employ them.
If Starbucks thought this would blow over, they were sadly mistaken. Since the January announcement, consumer perception levels have fallen by two-thirds as measured by YouGov BrandIndex’s Buzz score. The perception tracker measures if respondents have “heard anything about the brand in the last two weeks, through advertising, news or word of mouth, was it positive or negative.” The recent responses show only 24 percent of consumers polled saying they would consider patronizing Starbucks, while two days before the announcement, the results were at 30 percent, the highest proportion in almost a year.
YouGov conducts surveys of about 4,800 people each week day as a representation of the U.S. population, and they say that there’s reason to believe the backlash will impact the chain’s bottom line. (RELATED: Get all the news Google is trying to hide at Censored.news)
It appears Schulz has not learned his lesson that mixing liberal political agendas and coffee does not work out well, or perhaps he is just too cocky to care. Who can forget the failed “Race Together” stunt where Starbucks encouraged its baristas to write the phrase on cups for customers to start a discussion on race? And there was the uproar caused when Starbucks stripped all Christmas themed images from their cups to “promote inclusiveness” back in 2015.
Whether or not this decline in positive public opinion or potential loss of revenue will affect Schulz’s refugee hiring plan remains to be seen. Most of us know the best way to get action out of a company is to hit them where it hurts – their bottom line – and that appears to be happening right now.
Sources:
With Peking, it’s never just about free trade
Brad Salzberg
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/with-beijing-its- never-just-about-free-trade/ article34049806/
Like it or not, Canada opens exploratory free-trade talks with China on Monday with an initial four-day session in Beijing. Opinion polls indicate most Canadians do not want further political-economic integration with China, but elements of Canada’s business elite, with lucrative connections to Chinese business networks, are lobbying the Prime Minister’s Office hard to push on.
Brad: Such is the state of our nation under global-boy Justin Trudeau.Among them are wealthy friends of our political-party leaders and Chinese nationals who we have recently learned attend political fundraisers even though Canadian law forbids them from making party contributions.Brad: What does something as benign as Canadian law mean to these communist billionaires? Probably about as much as the law means back in the motherland…absolutely nothing.But a Canada-China deal implies much more than removing tariff barriers to the flow of goods and services. China sees FTAs as a geopolitical strategy,good not just for enhancing economic interests but advancing its long-term foreign-policy goals.Brad:China sees similar advantage in weaning Canada away from our economic and political alliance with the United States.Brad: Have no worries…Trudeau is with you on this one. Like his father, Justin admires the dictatorship in China and loathes Americanism.Canada has already ceded ground on this, making recent concessions – with no promise whatsoever of reciprocal considerations – to ease limits on Chinese state investment in Canada; seize and repatriate assets of certain Chinese nationals in Canada; and (inexplicably) reverse a national security review that prevented a Beijing-backed concern from buying Canadian advanced laser technology with military application for directed-energy weapons that China is desperate to develop.
Brad: Translation…Justin and his Sunny gang of globalists are a menace. Whether its pushing for Islamic domination by way of M103, or capitulating to the motherland on their geo-political ambitions, JT is hell-bent upon fulfilling the role he was groomed for: to destroy Canadian sovereignty in the name of a globalist agenda not a single Canadian asked for.The other concern is whether, ultimately, Canada can even bring home a deal that actually expands our share of the Chinese market.
Brad: If they did, it would be an unprecedented miracle. In the history of Canada’s relationship with the behemoth nation, a state of reciprocity has yet to manifest after over a century years of business “partnering.”We know that Ambassador John McCallum is feeling an intense burden to show progress before the next election, but the precedent of our previous Foreign Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement with China – which made considerable concessions to Beijing on labour and environmental standards, and delivered little benefit to Canadian investors in China – does not bode well.
Brad: Sending McCallum to do this job is like placing Iqra Khalid in charge of a Liberal government “Christian Revitalization” program.Beijing knows the government of Canada is under pressure to land a deal; they already sense a negotiating advantage and will hang tough on making any meaningful concessions to close.
Brad: Under pressure from whom? Ever notice that with anything and everything related to China’s integration into Canadian society, everything is MUST DO and MUST HAPPEN and PRESSURE IS ENORMOUS.
It’s a myth. Canadians do not want this and they have said so in multiple polls. But of course, these forces are communist, so the will of the public means nothing to them.
Strange, as this is also true of our prime minister…
Any FTA with China should be ironclad, with mechanisms that ensure China will follow the letter and spirit of an agreement that inviolably guarantees Canada will enjoy mutually reciprocal benefits.
Brad: This, and a dollar, will get you a cup of coffee at Mc’Donalds.
The Canadian government should be fully accountable to prepare measures to address concomitant concerns over Canadian sovereignty, security and our commitment to the universal norms of human rights that are inevitably part and parcel of getting closer to China.
Canadians must demand transparency and an honest debate on what we are getting into with China. But will we get it?
Brad: Don’t be absurd.
SPREAD THE WORD — TAKE THESE TO A COLOUR COMPUTER PRINTER AND MAKE POSTERS FOR DISTRIBUTION
or
Order Posters from CFIRC
E=mail paul@paulfromm.com
or write
CFRIC,
P.O. Box 332.
Rexdale,ON.,
M9W 5L3
__ 10 for $5.00
__ 20 for $10.00
A 34 year old immigrant from Somalia was arrested for savagely attacking a woman next to the parking garage of a Sheraton hotel in Sweden.

The woman died while being raped. Police say the perpetrator continued to rape the woman’s corpse well after she had died. The Somalian was apprehended by police while still in the act of raping the murdered woman. Source in Swedish. By the way, Sweden and Norway are in the middle of a massive epidemic of violent rapes. Crime statistics show that rapes in both countries are overwhelmingly perpetrated by Muslim immigrants.2013 figures were given in a recent report by Swedish Public Radio. In the first seven months of 2013, over 1,000 Swedish women reported being raped by Muslim immigrants. Over 300 of those were under the age of 15. The number of rapes is up 16% compared to 2012 numbers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Association for Free Expression Protest at Iqra Khalid’s Office — Paul Fromm (back to the camera) slides letter of protest into shut office door.
|
|
|
|
|